Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 503: debated on Thursday 7 January 2010

Written Answers to Questions

Thursday 7 January 2010

Prime Minister

Departmental Conferences

To ask the Prime Minister how many (a) away days and (b) conferences that took place outside his Office's buildings attended by civil servants in his Office there have been since 2005; and what the cost was of each. (307470)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer given by my right hon. Friend the Minister of State for the Cabinet Office on 16 December 2009, Official Report, column 1253W.

Departmental Written Questions

To ask the Prime Minister how many and what percentage of parliamentary questions tabled for written answer by him on a named day in session 2008-09 received a substantive answer on that day. (307534)

My office aims to answer all ordinary written parliamentary questions within five working days, and named day written parliamentary questions on the day named.

In the parliamentary session 2008-09 87 per cent. of named day questions were answered on the day named.

Iraq Committee of Inquiry

To ask the Prime Minister whether it is his policy not to make any substantive comment on Iraq until the Chilcot Inquiry on Iraq has completed its work. (308058)

I will continue to take forward the Government's policy in Iraq. As to the inquiry, it continues to sit and will hear evidence and then make its report.

Members: Surveillance

To ask the Prime Minister with reference to the answer to my right hon. Friend the Member for Haltemprice and Howden (David Davis) of 21 July 2009, Official Report, column 1166W, on Members: surveillance, whether the Wilson Doctrine applies to forms of surveillance and interception which are not subject to authorisation by the Secretary of State's warrant. (308634)

I have nothing further to add to the answer I gave on 21 July 2009, Official Report, column 1166W.

Official Gifts

To ask the Prime Minister (1) what official gifts he and his predecessor have received from the President of Pakistan in each year since 2001; (307738)

(2) what official gifts he and his predecessor have received from the President of Afghanistan in each year since 2001.

The Government have published annual lists of gifts received and given by Ministers in an official capacity valued at more than £140 since 2001. Copies of the lists are available in the Libraries of the House. Information for the current financial year will be published in the usual way.

House of Commons Commission

Disabled People

To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission what steps the House of Commons Commission has taken to apply the principles of Article 29 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 in respect of making reasonable adjustments to enable a disabled person to hold office in the last five years. (307865)

The House provides considerable support for Members with disabilities to help them to carry out their duties. Support and advice are provided by the Department of Resources, the Department of Facilities and the Parliamentary ICT Service. This support includes medical appraisals and help from the Consultant Occupational Health Physician, the provision of a variety of equipment (i.e. specialised IT software and equipment, motorised wheelchairs etc.), accommodation adjustments, and funding for transport needs and additional staff help where necessary. A leaflet is in preparation setting out the help that is available to Members with disabilities after the next general election.

The Commission’s duties under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 are duties owed as an employer rather than duties owed to holders of elected office.

Defence

Afghanistan: Reconstruction

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when he expects the Kajaki dam in Northern Helmand province to be operational. (308633)

I have been asked to reply.

The Kajaki dam is operational and producing around 33 MW of power, benefiting at least 200,000 people.

Armed Forces: Training

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to his statement of 15 December 2009, Official Report, columns 801-04, on the future defence programme, (1) which training exercises will be cancelled; (309240)

(2) what aspects of Army training his Department plans to reduce.

Given our current commitments, we must ensure that our core activity is focused on preparing our soldiers for the Department’s main effort, success on operations in Afghanistan. Combined with the pressures that the Defence budget has faced, this means prioritising our resources to these critical activities, and reductions in some non-operational specific training. Our training, and associated equipment fleets, are being managed to this effect.

We are working through detailed implementation. But no training for current deployments will be cut. An example where we could expect reductions, however, is in the levels of training provided for heavy armour, such as Challenger 2 tanks which have not been deployed in Afghanistan.

Departmental Billing

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many and what proportion of invoices submitted to his Department have been paid within 10 days in each month since October 2008; and if he will make a statement. (307961)

Information currently available for the Department, its agencies and trading funds is provided in the following table:

MOD and agenciesUKHOMet OfficeDSTLDSG

Total

Percentage paid

Total

Percentage paid

Total

Percentage paid

Total

Percentage paid

Total

Percentage paid

November 2008

390,354

72.3

December 2008

415,608

85.0

January 2009

361,494

80.0

1,267

55.5

February 2009

459246

85.0

1,010

82.5

March 2009

466,246

90.7

740

94.7

1,271

86.2

April 2009

472,644

92.8

551

97.6

1,090

81.3

May 2009

445,844

98.4

572

98.1

922

77.5

June 2009

448,697

97.5

574

97.4

610

92.3

July 2009

431,323

97.7

800

98.5

729

93.0

3,592

72.5

August 2009

412,871

98.0

547

97.8

577

95.1

2,284

98.0

September 2009

398,351

98.0

491

94.9

638

95.9

2,234

88.5

6,286

76.4

October 2009

415,740

98.6

600

98.0

647

95.0

3,081

98.8

6,446

88.7

November 2009

420,291

98.4

577

95.0

594

96.8

2,621

98.6

7,047

92.5

Key:

UKHO: United Kingdom Hydrographic Office

DSTL: Defence Science and Technology Laboratory

DSG: Defence Support Group

The Government are committed to improving the payment culture in the UK in order to create a fair and stable business climate. Government Departments and their agencies should aim to pay all invoices not in dispute within 10 days or within the agreed contractual terms if otherwise specified.

The Ministry of Defence fully supports this policy.

Olympics

Olympic Games: Education

To ask the Minister for the Olympics whether she plans to take steps to provide educational materials to schools on the history of the Olympic Games. (308476)

“Get Set” is the official London 2012 education programme for schools, colleges and local authority education providers across the UK. It is managed by The London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games and funded by the Department for Children, Schools and Families.

The “Get Set” programme offers a wide range of opportunities for young people between 3 and 19 to connect with London 2012 and also for education providers across the UK to use “Get Set” materials. There are over 9,000 schools, colleges and other learning institutions registered.

The “Get Set” website:

www.london2012.com/getset

offers learning providers a range of resources such as films, activity ideas and games based around the Paralympic and Olympic values.

It is updated on a regular basis to provide fresh ideas and additional support materials. For example, teachers were provided with material to mark 1,000 days to go to London 2012 and resources will also be released to tie in with the Vancouver Winter Olympic Games beginning in February.

The resources available include information on the history of the Olympic/Paralympic movements which can be used on the web or downloaded as factsheets.

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Animal Welfare Act 2006

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs with reference to the answer of 12 October 2009, Official Report, column 279W, on the Animal Welfare Act 2006, what progress has been made on considering the consultation responses; and when he expects revised drafts to be published. (309329)

[holding answer 6 January 2010]: The codes of practice for the welfare of cats, dogs and horses were laid before Parliament on 8 December. If approved by Parliament, they will come into force on 6 April 2010.

A summary of the responses can be found on the DEFRA website and copies of all the responses have been placed in the House Library.

Animals: Codes of Practice

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs for what reasons the recently published codes of practice for the welfare of dogs and cats did not include guidance on breeding. (308187)

The main purpose of the cat and dog codes is to assist the courts in cases of poor welfare, brought under the Animal Welfare Act, in relation to cats or dogs. Another purpose is to provide owners of cats and dogs with guidance in how to meet the welfare needs of their animals, as required under the Act. Protecting the progeny of animals is not covered in the code.

The breeding of dogs has been considered by the Associate Parliamentary Group on Animal Welfare, which reported in the autumn. The report from Sir Patrick Bateson on dog breeding will be published in January. The recommendations from these two inquiries will need careful consideration and to issue a code of practice on breeding at this juncture might preempt the conclusions we draw from this valuable work.

Campaign for the Farmed Environment

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what discussions he has had with the Country Landowners Association and the National Farmers Union on (a) the Campaign for the Farmed Environment sponsored by these bodies and (b) progress towards the targets set by that campaign for (i) England, (ii) Lancashire and (iii) Cumbria. (308541)

I have met with the leaders of both organisations a number of times over recent months to discuss how best to recapture the environmental benefits of set-aside through the development of the Campaign for the Farmed Environment, as have my ministerial colleagues and our officials. The Memorandum of Understanding which has been signed by all the campaign partners, including DEFRA, CLA and NFU, and the nearly £3 million of funding which the Department has earmarked for the campaign, demonstrates the commitment of all the partners to its success.

The campaign's targets are for England and are not county-specific. It is currently too early to assess the impact of the campaign on the ground, following its official launch on 5 November 2009, but I have just received an interim report from the campaign's industry partners reporting on progress to date with setting up the campaign. DEFRA has also recently sent out a baseline sample survey of farmers' existing voluntary actions, against which future annual surveys will establish the progress of the campaign. Our intention is that the results of the first of these surveys will be published in summer 2010.

Domestic Waste: Waste Disposal

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs which local authorities levy an annual charge for wheeled refuse containers; what charge was set by each such authority in 2009-10; and how much each such authority raised in such charges in the most recent financial year. (309433)

Food: Climate Change

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will take steps in consultation with farmers and supermarkets to undertake research into the effects of climate change on the preservation of foodstuffs grown in an extended growing season. (308885)

The Government have not funded research to look specifically at the impacts of climate change on storage of food products. However, we have funded research to improve storage of products to extend storage time, maintain quality in storage and therefore reduce losses. This has been achieved through improvements in storage technology and crop management.

We have also commissioned research to develop storage technologies that are more sustainable. The knowledge and improved technologies delivered provide greater resilience to climate change because they provide options for adaptation. A non-exhaustive list of relevant research projects is shown in the following table.

Further information on these projects is available from the DEFRA website at:

http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Location=None &Module=FilterSearchNewLook&Completed=Q

Code

Title

Start

End

Cost (£)

FO0308

Development of diffuse browning disorder in relation to physiological and biochemical changes in apple fruit during development and storage

April 2007

March 2009

201,094

LK09105

A novel strategy for reducing wastage in potato storage by improved control of tuber dormancy.

October 2007

March 2008

42,468

LK0985

Defining and managing risks to safety and quality during food and feed grain storage

July 2006

July 2011

648,020

LK0967

Biopesticides for the control of storage insect pests

April 2005

September 2009

393,114

AR0603

Interaction of biology and behaviour of storage insects with environmental conditions in bulk grain

April 2002

March 2006

655,327

AR0604

Safe storage of grain by preventing and controlling the development of mite pests

April 2002

March 2006

614,325

HH2602SFV

Molecular and biochemical characters of post harvest quality in brassicas

January 2002

December 2005

539,903

LK0929

Improving the detection and monitoring of storage beetle pests by development of a multi-species lure

October 2002

September 2005

221,329

HH2603STF

The potential for manipulating the orchard microflora to control storage rot fungi

April 2001

March 2005

208,399

HH2604STF

Storage rots in plums and cherries

September 2001

August 2004

154,852

HH2606STF

Identify the mechanisms of a naturally-occurring, heritable trait for reduced ethylene production in apple fruits

April 2001

March 2004

494,252

LK0919

Control of potato storage diseases by laser treatment

October 2001

September 2004

116,015

HH2118STF

Integrated control of new storage rot problems in apples and pears.

April 1998

March 2001

153,781

HH2120TTF

Expanding the potential of the UK stone fruit industry by the use of modern storage technology

April 1998

March 2001

246,847

HH2114STF

Investigation into improving storage of horticultural produce by control of ethylene metabolism.

October 1997

September 2000

306,013

Hunting Act 2004

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many convictions there have been under the Hunting Act 2004. (308234)

[holding answer 6 January 2010]: The following table shows the number of defendants found guilty at all courts in England and Wales for offences under the Hunting Act 2004 from 2005-07 (latest available).

Data for 2008 is planned for publication on 28 January 2010.

Number of defendants found guilty at all courts for offences under the Hunting Act 20041, England and Wales, 2005-072, 3

Number

2005

2

2006

5

2007

48

1 Came into force on 18 February 2005.

2 The court proceedings statistics relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences, the principal offence is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.

3 Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.

Source:

Justice Statistics Analytical Services: Ministry of Justice. (Ref: 591-09)

Sewers: Private Sector

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs when he expects to implement a new Mandatory Build Standard for the transfer of private sewers and drains to water company ownership; and if he will make a statement. (308077)

There is little point transferring existing private sewers if a new stock of private sewers is allowed to grow over time to replace it. Therefore, provision is contained in the Flood and Water Management Bill, currently before Parliament, for new sewers connecting to the public system to be built to a mandatory standard and then adopted by water and sewerage companies. DEFRA officials are working with stakeholders on the preparation of a mandatory build standard for consultation.

Subject to the successful passage of the Bill, I anticipate that the standards should be published in advance of the transfer of existing private sewers and lateral drains.

Leader of the House

Members: Allowances

To ask the Leader of the House what timetable has been set for the cessation of the communications allowance. (308809)

No claims for expenditure incurred on or after 1 January 2010 will be paid from Communications Expenditure, with the exception of expenditure on advertisements for surgeries, including posters (subject to restrictions set out as follows) and maintenance of equipment funded from Communications Expenditure where there are contractual commitments.

Advertisements for surgeries, where the expenditure is incurred on or after 1 January 2010 and is funded by Communications Expenditure, must not include party colours or logos and slogans, must not include extraneous material, must be proportionate in nature, and may not include advertisements in national media or leaflets or flyers; references to other elected officials must be approved in advance by the Department of Resources.

No materials or resources, other than websites and office equipment, purchased from Communications Expenditure before 1 January 2010 may be used on or after that date unless the Member first returns the full cost of those resources to the House.

Where Communications Expenditure is used to fund an ongoing cost or item which occurs across both the restricted and unrestricted period, only the relevant fraction of the costs can be paid for out of Communications Expenditure, unless the item concerned is (i) one of the items excepted in the first paragraph above or (ii) the Member entered into an unconditional obligation to pay for the item using Communications Expenditure on or before 23 November 2009 and the item is not used on or after 1 January 2010.

The Department of Resources issued detailed guidance on 16 December 2009. Members who have any queries about their own Communications Expenditure during the restricted period should seek advice from the Department.

The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority has today published a draft allowances scheme for consultation under section 5 of the Parliamentary Standards Act 2009.

Cabinet Office

Central Office of Information: Procurement

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office (1) what criteria are used to assess a potential supplier to the Central Office of Information for inclusion on the list of approved suppliers; (307857)

(2) who the members are of the panel which approves suppliers to the Central Office of Information;

(3) what the names are of the approved suppliers to the Central Office of Information.

I have asked the chief executive of the Central Office of Information to reply to the hon. Member.

Letter from Mark Lund, dated 6 January 2010:

As Chief Executive of the Central Office of Information (COI), I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Questions on the COI Suppliers (307857/8/9).

Central Office of Information (COI) has 29 lists of approved suppliers referred to in the Public Contract Regulations 2006 as framework agreements. As a public sector body, COI has to comply with the requirements outlined in the Regulations when setting up framework agreements. The list of framework agreements and the suppliers that sit on each can be found on the COI website at

http://coi.gov.uk/suppliers.php?page=31

The requirements and deliverables expected of suppliers on each framework agreement differs, however suppliers are assessed to ensure that they are capable of providing the services that the framework agreement is set-up to deliver and to ensure that value for money is achieved through quality of the service, their technical ability and price.

The members of the panel that carry out the assessment of suppliers onto each framework agreement differs for each but is typically made up of at least two technical experts and one procurement expert. The final list of suppliers is signed off by the Director of the area and the Commercial Director.

Government Departments: Security

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office how many (a) prosecutions and (b) convictions there have been in respect of technical attacks through the internet on the computer systems of Government departments in each of the last three years. (307943)

I have been asked to reply.

Statistical data held by the Ministry of Justice on the Court Proceedings Database record the number of defendants proceeded against, found guilty and sentenced for criminal offences in England and Wales on a persons basis.

These data do not include information on the circumstances of an offence and it is therefore not possible to separately identify offences under the Computer Misuse Act 1990 that have resulted from unauthorised access to computer systems of Government Departments.

Non-departmental Public Bodies

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office when she expects the report of the latest review of non-departmental Government bodies to be published. (309409)

Cabinet Office produces an annual report on the size and spend of the non-departmental public body sector entitled “Public Bodies”. Cabinet Office aims to publish “Public Bodies 2009” shortly.

Northern Ireland

AccessNI

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many (a) basic, (b) standard and (c) enhanced applications have been processed by AccessNI in each month since April 2008; and what percentage of applications in each category was completed within the performance target time. (309171)

It is not possible to provide information for the period 1 April 2008 to 31 March 2009 in the manner requested. During this period AccessNI processed 115,268 applications. It was unable to meet its service standards between May and December 2008, but did meet them between January and March 2009. Information for the period 1 April to 31 October 2009 is set out in the following table.

1 April to 31 October 2009

Month

Number of basic processed

Percentage within target1

Number of standard processed

Percentage within target

Number of enhanced processed

Percentage within target

April

1,092

86.91

281

97.22

10,687

93.14

May

1,310

97.58

386

99.47

8,181

96.9

June

1,691

97.20

1,014

98.99

11,052

94.28

July

1,611

97.63

966

97.12

10,529

94.63

August

1,340

96.21

460

98.95

8,706

96.3

September

1,822

99.19

1,184

99.41

10,538

96.71

October

1,573

98.73

1,497

98.75

13,434

96.43

Totals

10,439

5,788

73,127

1 Basic target is 90 per cent. in two weeks

2 Standard target is 90 per cent. in three weeks

3 Enhanced target is 90 per cent. in four weeks

Clergy: Misconduct

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what discussions he has had with (a) the Irish government, (b) the Roman Catholic Bishop's Conference of Ireland and Primate of Ireland and (c) the Papal Nuncio on the implications of the report of the Irish Commission of Inquiry into sex abuse and related misconduct by members of the clergy and religious orders for clergy and members of religious orders transferred to dioceses or religious houses in Northern Ireland; and if he will make a statement. (308061)

Northern Ireland Office Ministers have had no discussions on these matters, nor any requests to discuss them, with any of the parties specified.

Departmental Legislation

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what criminal offences have been (a) created and (b) abolished by secondary legislation sponsored by his Department since 1 May 2008. (307796)

I refer the hon. Member to my answer of 7 December 2009, Official Report, column 21W, which considered primary legislation to include both Westminster Acts of Parliament and, for Northern Ireland, Orders in Council which would elsewhere be classified as secondary legislation. For the purposes of the current question I am therefore treating secondary legislation for Northern Ireland to cover statutory instruments excluding orders in Council.

Excluding agencies and non-departmental public bodies, the Northern Ireland Office has made four statutory rules which have made or repealed offences since 1 May 2008.

The Representation of the People (Northern Ireland) Regulations 2008; the Northern Ireland Assembly (Elections) (Amendment) Order 2009; and the European Parliamentary Elections (Northern Ireland) (Amendment) Order 2009 updated Northern Ireland electoral procedures. This brought them in line with changes made to UK electoral law by the Electoral Administration Act 2006 and included offences relating to voting and electoral registration procedures.

The Electoral Administration Act 2006 (Regulation of Loans etc: Northern Ireland) Order 2008 also provides for an offence of disclosing information contained in transaction reports in circumstances other than those set out in the order.

Transport

Cycling

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Transport what estimate he has made of the (a) number and (b) proportion of (i) children and (ii) adults in (A) Stroud district, (B) Gloucestershire and (C) England who cycle regularly. (309140)

Estimates from the National Travel Survey suggest that, across England as a whole, 31 per cent. of children and 10 per cent. of adults regularly cycled (i.e. at least one bicycle trip per week) between 2006 and 2008.

Equivalent statistics for Gloucestershire and the Stroud district are not available and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. However, for urban areas with resident populations of between 25,000 and 50,000 (such as the town of Stroud), the equivalent estimates were 30 per cent. for children and 10 per cent. for adults.

Departmental Official Hospitality

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Transport how much (a) his Department and (b) its agencies spent on (i) alcohol and (ii) entertainment in the last 12 months. (305531)

Generally, the Department for Transport (DFT) operates a no alcohol policy. In exceptional cases, where the Department is holding a special event or staff are attending a venue away from their normal office and working long hours necessitating an evening meal, some limited provision of alcoholic drinks at public expense may be permitted at the discretion of a senior civil servant. Spend incurred in such situations is not centrally recorded and this information could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

However, The Driving Standards Agency, Government Car and Despatch Agency, Highways Agency, Maritime and Coastguard Agency and the Vehicle Certification Agency recorded zero expenditure on alcohol.

Entertainment costs are not recorded as a specific cost category within the Department for Transport's accounting systems. To identify such expenditure would incur disproportionate costs. However, the Government Car and Despatch Agency and Highways Agency have both recorded zero expenditure on entertainment.

Departmental Pay

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Transport on what pay band his Department's chief information officer (CIO) is employed; whether the CIO is employed on a fixed-term or permanent contract; and what the size is of the budget for which the CIO is responsible in the period 2009-10. (307558)

The Department for Transport does not employ a full-time chief information officer. The role is split between the Director General and Director responsible, alongside wider policy responsibilities, for issues including information and knowledge management, data security, information and communication technology and knowledge management, in which they are supported by professional staff in the central Department and its agencies. There is no centrally managed budget for CIO activity. The budget for 2009-10 for the Information Management Directorate for ICT in the central Department was £13.5 million.

Driving Under Influence: Drugs

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Transport what assessment his Department has made of effectiveness of the recent advertisements on the dangers of drug driving. (309537)

The Department for Transport usually assesses the effectiveness of its advertising in three ways:

The effect on individuals’ awareness, motivation and claimed behaviours, which we measure through quantitative and qualitative research.

Progress against indicators such as in the case of our THINK! road safety campaign, the number of people killed or seriously injured.

How effectively it buys media space. Analysis by independent media auditors benchmarks the Government’s performance against private sector advertisers. Collectively, the Government are an efficient purchaser of media.

The THINK! Drug Drive advertising campaign ran from 17 August to 13 September 2009. The Department has not yet received or assessed all of the data listed above. However, research, including pre-campaign and post-campaign tracking surveys and website statistics, provides early indicators that the campaign has performed well against its core objectives including raising awareness of the risks of drug-driving.

East Coast Railway Line

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Transport whether his Department intends to make an assessment of the likely effect on public finances of retaining the East Coast Main Line in the public sector. (309323)

When rail franchises are let, the Department for Transport routinely prepares a “shadow bid” to provide a detailed estimate of the likely costs and revenues of the new franchise. In the case of the next Inter City East Coast franchise, this evaluation will be based on the costs and revenues of the current public sector train operator.

Local Government: Snow and Ice

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Transport what recent discussions he has had with (a) the Local Government Association and (b) local authorities on the contingency plans of local authorities in respect of extreme weather conditions. (309538)

The most recent discussions I have held with the Local Government Association on local authorities’ contingency plans in respect of extreme weather conditions were on 4 January 2010. Department for Transport officials are also in regular contact and discussion with the Local Government Association on these matters.

Lorries: Road Traffic

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Transport how many miles heavy goods vehicles over 3.5 tonnes travelled on dual carriageways in England in the most recent year for which figures are available; and what information his Department holds on the equivalent figures for (a) Scotland, (b) Wales and (c) Northern Ireland. (308560)

[holding answer 6 January 2010]: The estimated miles travelled by heavy goods vehicles on dual carriageways in England, Wales and Scotland in 2008 is shown in the following table.

Road network information for dual carriageways is not available for Northern Ireland.

Heavy goods vehicles

Billion vehicle miles

England

3.5

Scotland

0.4

Wales

0.2

Great Britain

4.1

Northern Ireland

Not available

Source:

National Road Traffic Survey (2008).

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Transport (1) how many miles UK and foreign registered heavy goods vehicles over 3.5 tonnes travelled on (a) motorways and (b) trunk roads in England in the last year for which figures are available; and what information his Department holds on the equivalent figures for (i) Scotland, (ii) Wales and (iii) Northern Ireland; (308561)

(2) how many miles UK and foreign registered heavy goods vehicles over 3.5 tonnes travelled on all roads in England in the last year for which figures are available; and what information his Department holds on the equivalent figures for (a) Scotland, (b) Wales and (c) Northern Ireland.

[holding answer 6 January 2010]: The Department for Transport does not hold figures on traffic or the country of vehicle registration for Northern Ireland, but the estimated miles travelled by UK and foreign registered heavy goods vehicles over 3.5 tonnes on all roads in England, Scotland and Wales is shown in the following table.

HGV traffic on all roads by registration and region, 2008

Billion vehicle miles

Registered heavy goods vehicles

UK

Foreign

Total

England

4.78

0.56

15.3

Scotland

1.68

0.03

1.7

Wales

0.77

0.03

0.8

Sources:

Traffic: National Road Traffic Survey.

Registration: Vehicle Excise Duty Evasion Survey (June 2008).

Due to small sample sizes, the estimates of miles driven in England, Scotland and Wales will be subject to a margin of uncertainty, and the sample size is too small to provide reliable estimates of the miles travelled by road class.

Northern Rail: Rolling Stock

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Transport what recent discussions his Department has had on the future of Northern Rail's Pacer (Class 142) rolling stock. (309498)

The Department for Transport has been in recent discussion with Northern Rail regarding their proposals for delivering additional capacity through the High Level Output Specification (HLOS). These discussions which are currently ongoing have included the totality of their rolling stock fleet including class 142s.

The recently announced electrification programme in the North West will also allow some class 142 Pacer vehicles that operate on these lines to be replaced with electric trains.

In addition, the Department meets with each of the Rolling Stock Leasing Companies (ROSCOs) on a regular basis to discuss their respective portfolio of rolling stock vehicles, which includes class 142 Pacer vehicles.

Railways: Franchises

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Transport what assessment his Department has made of the value for money of operating rail passenger services in the public sector after each passenger franchise expires. (309324)

Under current legislation, the Secretary of State has the ability to step in to secure continuity of train service provision only if a train operator becomes unable to meet the terms of its franchise agreement. However, this can only be a temporary arrangement as there is no provision for train services to be permanently retained in the public sector without a change to legislation.

Therefore the Department for Transport has made no assessment of the value for money of operating rail passenger services in the public sector on a permanent basis after each passenger franchise expires.

Rolling Stock

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Transport how many of the 1,300 extra carriages referred to in the Government's Rail White Paper published in July 2007 are in operation on the network; and on which lines they are operating. (300347)

[holding answer 23 November 2009]: A total of 380 new and additional vehicles are already either in service or are being prepared for service subject to the train operator finalising service plans.

This includes 232 new vehicles currently in operation with the following train operators:

TOC

Class

Type

Number of vehicles

Southern Railway

377

EMU

48

London Midland

350/2

EMU

148

Southern Railway

377

EMU

36

311 further new vehicles have been ordered and manufacturers are currently progressing their construction.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Transport who will decide whether the super express trains manufactured by Hitachi will have provision for (a) an operational safety role for a guard or conductor and (b) a restaurant buffet car. (309325)

The Department for Transport has specified all Super Express Trains to be capable of operating either with a guard or in driver-only operation. This reflects the flexibility of train deployment on different route types, including long distance and commuter. As today, the mode of operation of services on specific routes will be managed by the train operating company.

Super Express Trains will offer suitable equipment to deliver on-train catering, ranging from at-seat trolley to full restaurant buffet car service. The catering provision will vary according to the service being operated and, as today, will be managed by the train operating company.

Communities and Local Government

Council Tax

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what complaints relating to council tax collection the Local Government Ombudsman has adjudicated in the last 36 months. (308258)

Councillors: Codes of Practice

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government with reference to the written ministerial statement of 5 November 2009, Official Report, column 56WS, on judicial declarations (freemasonry), whether he plans to amend the Code of Conduct for Councillors in respect of its declaration requirements. (308800)

While the Model Code of Conduct for councillors contains no specific provision on freemasonry, it does require members to include in their register of interests their membership of any charitable bodies; freemasons consider themselves such a body.

Departmental Advertising

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much his Department has spent on (a) print, (b) online, (c) television and (d) radio advertising in each of the last five years; how much has been spent on advertising in 2009-10 to date; and what percentage of advertising expenditure in each year was managed by the Central Office of Information. (309900)

Information on the Department for Communities and Local Government expenditure on advertising is published every year in its Annual Report. Since 2008-09 this information has been published in a format which allows it to be broken down by the type of media used. However, the information is not available for previous years in this format.

For the financial year 2008-09 I refer the hon. Member to the information provided on the Department's website at:

http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/corporate/pdf/1298507.pdf

For previous years I refer the hon. Member to the appropriate departmental Annual Report, available in the House Library.

The Department will publish a breakdown of advertising expenditure in 2009-10 at the time of its next Annual Report.

The Department does not hold data on the proportion of its advertising expenditure managed by the Central Office of Information.

Departmental Conferences

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much was spent by his Department and its agencies on conferences they organised which were subsequently cancelled in each of the last three years; and what the title was of each such conference. (308822)

The Department does not hold this information centrally and it could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

The Planning Inspectorate does not hold this information centrally and it could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Fire Service College does not hold this information centrally and it could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Queen Elizabeth Conference Centre can confirm that have not had any expenditure on cancelled conferences.

Departmental Pay

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the (a) average and (b) highest non-consolidated performance-related payment was in cash terms for a senior civil servant in his Department in each of the last five years. (308246)

The following table shows the average and highest payments of non-consolidated variable payments awarded by CLG to the senior civil service over the last five financial years.

£

Average amount paid

Highest amount paid

2009-10

7,365

12,500

2008-09

8,396

20,500

2007-08

6,597

16,270

2006-07

6,868

12,500

2005-06

4,954

9,500

Departmental Responsibilities

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what programmes and projects for which his Department is responsible have been cancelled in the last 12 months; and in respect of how many such programmes and projects funding has been reduced. (308424)

The Department’s spending plans for 2009-10 were set out in the main estimates published on 18 June 2009 (HC 514) and the associated explanatory memorandum for the Communities and Local Government Select Committee published at:

http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmcomloc/memo/mainestimate/ucm01.pdf

Changes to those plans were set out in the winter supplementary estimates published on 24 November 2009 (HC 24), with further detail set out in the explanatory memorandum to the Select Committee, copies of which are available in the Library of the House.

Further changes will be published in the forthcoming spring supplementary estimates in February.

Departmental Telephone Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many telephone lines with the prefix (a) 0870, (b) 0845 and (c) 0800 his Department (i) operates and (ii) sponsors; how many calls were received to each number in the last 12 months; and whether alternative numbers charged at the BT local rate are available in each case. (305209)

Communities and Local Government does not operate or sponsor telephone contact lines with the relevant prefixes. The departmental contact number is an 030 number which is reserved for public services and calls to this service are charged at national rate. No revenue is raised through this service.

Energy Performance Certificates

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government with reference to the answer to the hon. Member for Welwyn Hatfield of 18 May 2009, Official Report, column 1193W, on energy performance certificates, if he will place in the Library a copy of the research report commissioned from AECOM. (308740)

The full evaluation of the EPBD is expected to be completed in mid-2010 when copies will be placed in the Library of the House.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what his Department’s most recent estimate is of the effect on the sale price of homes to which energy efficiency improvements have been made of the requirement to produce an energy performance certificate. (309401)

No such estimate has been made.

However, the Department for Communities and Local Government is working with the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors and other stakeholders on a project to explore the extent to which energy performance is reflected in the value of a property and the effect on the market price of homes as a result of the installation of energy efficiency and renewable heat and energy technologies.

Government Office for London: Location

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what progress has been made towards the relocation of the Government office for London; whether an alternative location has been identified; and whether he expects relocation to take place before the lease at Riverwalk House expires in 2011. (309492)

A relocation project is in progress, being run jointly by the Government office for London and the Communities and Local Government Estates Directorate, in line with the Government Estates Transformation Programme.

The project has identified Eland House, currently part of the Communities and Local Government Estate, as the most suitable location. The relocation project has an anticipated completion date of 31 December 2010, well in advance of the expiry of the lease on Riverwalk House.

Home Information Packs

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what recent assessment he has made of the level of compliance of (a) estate agents and (b) home-sellers with requirements relating to home information packs. (308256)

I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave on 8 July 2009, Official Report, columns 902-03W, to the hon. Member for Peterborough (Mr. Jackson).

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government with reference to the answer to the hon. Member for Meriden of 18 May 2009, Official Report, column 1211W, on home information packs, (1) whether rules on misleading omissions apply to property information questionnaires constituting a marketing communication between a home seller and a home buyer; (308603)

(2) whether estate agents are liable for misleading omissions made by a home seller producing a property information questionnaire; and what obligations estate agents have to check the (a) accuracy and (b) truthfulness of property information questionnaires.

Section 155 of the Housing Act 2004 provides that the person responsible for marketing is under a duty to have a Home Information Pack (HIP) in his possession which complies with the Home Information Pack (No. 2) Regulations 2007. Where the person responsible for marketing is an estate agent, Regulation 36 provides that he cannot be held in breach where a document (other than the Index and Sale Statement) fails to comply with the Regulations and the agent believed on reasonable grounds that it did comply.

Estate agents are under a duty under the Home Information Pack (No. 2) Regulations 2007 to ensure that the HIP includes a completed Property Information Questionnaire (PIQ) but are not under a duty to ensure that the answers given by the seller are accurate and truthful. An estate agent could be in breach of the Consumer Protection Regulations (CPRs) if he failed to act on information in the PIQ which he knew to be inaccurate or untruthful, because they are required by the CPRs to act in accordance with honest market practice and good faith.

Local Government and Housing Act 1989

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many individuals were found guilty of breaching section 19(2) of the Local Government and Housing Act 1989 from its commencement to its repeal. (308733)

The Department does not have information about the number of local authority members who have not complied with section 19(2) of the Local Government and Housing Act.

Local Government Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the monetary value is of the area-based grant to be allocated in (a) 2010-11 and (b) 2011-12; and what criteria are used to allocate that grant to local authorities. (307833)

The monetary value of area based grant (ABG) for 2010-11 is £5,028,317,187. The allocation for 2011-12 has yet to be announced. Decisions on future public spending plans will be a matter for the next spending review.

The criteria used to allocate departmental contributions to ABG are decided by the respective Departments, and will reflect factors such as relative need for the services covered by each contribution to the Grant. For example, the distribution of money for schools intervention will take account of the number of maintained schools in the area.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the central Government grant per capita was to each local authority, including police and fire authorities in (a) 2008-09 and (b) 2009-10. (308654)

I have placed in the Library of the House tables showing central Government grant per capita by local authority for 2008-09 and 2009-10. However, it should be noted that figures between the two years are not directly comparable because the 2008-09 figures are based on outturn information whereas those for 2009-10 are based on budget information. It should also be borne in mind that local authorities may not have complete information about all central Government grants at the time they completed the budget returns.

The definition of central Government grant used here is the sum of formula grant (revenue support grant, redistributed non-domestic rates and police grant), Greater London authority grant, specific grants inside Aggregate External Finance (AEF), i.e. revenue grants paid for council’s core services and Area Based Grant (ABG).

Figures exclude grants outside AEF (i.e. where funding is not for authorities’ core services, but is passed to a third party, for example, rent allowances and rebates), capital grants, funding for the local authorities’ housing management responsibilities and those grant programmes (such as European funding) where authorities are simply one of the recipients of funding paid towards an area.

Mid-year 2008 population estimates are used to calculate per capita information. 2009 figures are not yet available. For National Parks mid-year 2007 estimates are used because they are the most recent available.

Local Government Finance: Lancashire

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what funding the Government provided to (a) Lancashire county council and (b) Preston city council in real terms in (i) 1997 and (ii) 2009. (308652)

The following table shows central Government funding provided to Lancashire county council and Preston city council in real terms at 2008-09 prices. Figures between the two years are not directly comparable because those for 1997-98 are based on outturn information whereas those for 2009-10 are based on budget information. In addition, local authorities may not have had complete information about all central Government grants at the time of completing the budget returns.

£ million

1997-98

2009-10

Lancashire

955.4

1,210.0

Preston

16.9

21.9

Source:

Communities and Local Government Revenue Outturn (RO) returns for 1997-98 and 2009-10.

The definition of central Government grant used here is the sum of formula grant (revenue support grant, redistributed non-domestic rates and police grant) and specific grants inside aggregate external finance (AEF), i.e. revenue grants paid for council’s core services. In 2009-10 figures include area-based grant (ABG).

Figures exclude grants outside AEF (i.e. where funding is not for authorities’ core services, but is passed to a third party, for example, rent allowances and rebates), capital grants, funding for the local authorities’ housing management responsibilities and those grant programmes (such as European funding) where authorities are simply one of the recipients of funding paid towards an area.

Local Government: Accountability

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what recent representations he has received on accountability mechanisms for local authority (a) strategic partnerships, (b) safeguarding boards and (c) partnership bodies. (306352)

Chapter 1 of the Strengthening Local Democracy consultation sought views on the extension of scrutiny powers of Local Area Agreement partners and whether these should be made more explicit in relation to the wider delivery of local public services in an area. The consultation also asked whether the structure of local partnerships should be reviewed in order to identify unhelpful overlap and duplication and whether these were particular issues on which such a review should focus. Over 1,400 responses were received to this consultation and I will be publishing the formal response to it in due course.

In addition, on 23 December, I received the formal shortlist of 199 proposals from the Local Government Association in its role as the Selector under the provisions of the Sustainable Communities Act, and a number of these make suggestions about accountability mechanisms for local authorities and other bodies.

Local Government: Contracts

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government whether he has plans to update the publication Guidance on contracting for Services in the light of the Human Rights Act 1998, to take account of recent judgments relating to the scope of that Act. (308266)

The Improvement and Development Agency for local government (IdeA) have commissioned the British Institute of Human Rights to carry out a project looking at the relevance of a human rights approach to local government and service delivery. We will consider the need for any revised guidance in light of the outcome of this project.

Local Government: Elections

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what guidance (a) his Department and (b) the Standards Board for England has issued on whether local authority (i) buildings and (ii) equipment provided for councillors to carry out their representative role may be used for the production of political campaigning literature. (308638)

As made clear in the statutory Code of Recommended Practice on Local Authority Publicity issued by my Department, section 2 of the Local Government Act 1986 provides that council resources should never be used for purely political purposes.

Standards for England have published guidance on the use of local authority resource for political campaigning, both in their guide to the local authority members’ code of conduct and in their ‘Case Review’ for 2007. Both publications are available from Standards for England’s website at:

www.standardsforengland.gov.uk

Local Government: Insurance

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government whether an impact assessment was undertaken in respect of proposals to enable local authorities to set up mutual insurance schemes in the Economic Development, Local Democracy and Construction Bill; and what assessment has been made of the level of compliance of those proposals with competition rules. (309005)

An impact assessment reporting on the impact of providing powers for local authorities to enter into mutual insurance arrangements was published on 13 October 2009. This is accessible at:

www.communities.gov.uk/publications/localgovernment/bestvalueauthorityia

Companies through which authorities are required to operate when exercising the power to form and participate in mutual insurance bodies, as set out in the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009, will be required to comply with competition law.

Local Government: Public Consultation

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the cost to the public purse was of the redress review; and which of its recommendations have been implemented. (308589)

In addition to staff time, the Department for Communities and Local Government spent £113,781 on the redress review.

The Department accepted the recommendation to run a series of pilots for local authorities and partnerships to test and develop the Practitioner’s Toolkit produced by the review when it was presented with the review in June 2009. Nine local authorities are piloting the toolkit, and further information is available on our website at:

http://www.communities.gov.uk/communities/communityempowerment/communitiesincontrol/redressreview/

One of these pilots is looking at how best partners could come together to deliver better services and remedies for people recently made redundant. The pilots also include elements as the sharing of learning at regional events, all of which were also recommendations of the review.

The Government will be making a formal response to the review shortly.

Local Government: Publicity

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what funding his Department has given to the Local Government Information Unit to conduct research in relation to the revised draft Code on Local Authority Publicity. (309002)

The Department has given no funding to the Local Government Information Unit to conduct research in relation to any revised draft of the Code of Recommended Practice on Local Authority Publicity.

Mortgages

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government whether he has made an assessment of the variation between mortgage rates offered to homebuyers who wish to purchase a new-build home and those who wish to buy homes which have previously been owned and occupied. (307829)

Communities and Local Government is working closely with HMT, FSA and all those involved in the sale of new homes to support a sustainable and transparent mortgage market.

According to the CML Regulated Mortgage Survey, the average initial mortgage rate on new build was 4.63 per cent. in October 2009, compared to 4.42 per cent. on other properties.

Non-Domestic Rates

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the average business rate bill was in (a) cash and (b) real terms based on 2009 prices in each year since 1997-98. (307845)

The average non-domestic rates bill (in £s) in England in each year since 1997-98, including the estimated average figures for 2009-10, both in cash and in real terms based on 2009 prices, is shown in the following table.

Average non-domestic rates bill England

£

Cash

Real terms

1997-98

6,796

9,196

1998-99

7,016

9,126

1999-00

6,998

8,959

2000-01

8,264

10,275

2001-02

8,714

10,647

2002-03

9,071

10,919

2003-04

9,137

10,665

2004-05

9,301

10,593

2005-06

9,997

11,035

2006-07

10,275

11,059

2007-08

10,330

10,637

2008-09

11,274

11,142

2009-10 (estimated)

12,145

12,145

The data are taken from National non-domestic rates (NNDR) returns submitted by all billing authorities in England. Figures for 2009-10 are estimates.

Average business rate is calculated by dividing the net rate yield from local authority's lists by the number of hereditaments on the local list as at 31 December of the previous year.

Comparisons between years may not be valid as the rateable values for individual properties, and hence the actual rates bills, vary greatly. In addition, the figures for 1998-99 to 2000-01 are affected by transfers of properties from the central list to local ones; transfers of crown properties to local lists and adjustments made to the multiplier at the time of the 2000 revaluation. Changes in the figures for the years around 2005-06 are also affected by adjustments made to the multiplier at the time of the 2005 revaluation.

Non-Domestic Rates: Valuation

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government with reference to the answer of 12 November 2009, Official Report, column 884W, on non-domestic rates: valuation, if he will place in the Library a table showing the rateable values for (a) all properties, (b) small properties and (c) large properties in each local authority area according to the (i) 2005 Ratings List and (ii) draft 2010 Ratings List. (309530)

Ordnance Survey: Photography

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what aerial photographs are contained in the Ordnance Survey Mastermap Address Layer 2 product; and to what scale such photographs are produced. (308259)

Planning Permission

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what his Department's policy is on the number of statutory notices placed by local authorities in local newspapers; and what guidance his Department has provided to local authorities on whether their job advertisements should be published in local newspapers. (309001)

We have no policy about the number of statutory notices which local authorities may place in local newspapers.

The Code of Recommended Practice on Local Authority Publicity, to which local authorities must have regard in coming to any decision on publicity, including their job advertisements, states that the media chosen for job vacancies should be in keeping with the objective of maintaining the politically independent status of local authority staff.

Rates and Rating

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many (a) small and (b) large properties in each local authority area there are on the (i) 2005 and (ii) 2010 Ratings List. (309531)

I have placed in the Library of the House a table showing the number of small and large hereditaments in England broken down by billing authority on the 2005 and the draft 2010 Rating Lists as at 2 November 2009. A hereditament is classified as small in the 2005 Rating Lists if it has a rateable value of less than £21,500 in London or £15,000 elsewhere. A hereditament is classified as small in the draft 2010 Rating Lists if it has a rateable value of less than £25,500 in London or £18,000 elsewhere. These data are consistent with the statistical release titled: “Non-domestic rateable values: 2010 Local Rating Lists—England and Wales”, published on 18 December 2009. A copy of this statistical release is available at the following:

http://www.voa.gov.uk/publications/statistical_releases/VOA_Statistics_Release_Final.pdf

The number of hereditaments has been rounded to the nearest 10.

Social Rented Housing: Waiting Lists

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many households were on local authority waiting lists for social housing in England in April 2009. (308808)

Figures on the number of households registered on social housing waiting lists were published on 26 November in the Statistical Release, “Local Authority Housing Statistics, England: 2008-09”. This release can be found at:

http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/corporate/statistics/lahousing200809

Tenant Services Authority

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what role the Tenant Services Authority will have in (a) determining policy on rent controls, (b) inspecting local authorities and (c) the Audit Commission’s Comprehensive Area Assessment regime. (309033)

Policy on rent controls is a matter for Government.

Our intention is that the Tenant Services Authority (TSA) should have the role of deciding when an inspection of a local authority’s landlord services is needed, and that the TSA should then commission the Audit Commission to carry out such an inspection. This policy was set out in our consultation document “The Housing and Regeneration Act 2008 (Registration of Local Authorities) Order 2009”, published in August 2009, and confirmed in our response to that consultation, which we published in November 2009.

The TSA will participate with the Comprehensive Area Assessment regime alongside the other participating public service inspectorates.

Tenant Services Authority: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many full-time equivalent staff the Tenant Services Authority employs in its regulation team. (309824)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave him on 30 November 2009, Official Report, column 514W.

Home Department

Asylum

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department with reference to pages 80 and 81 of his Department’s Resource Accounts 2008-09, for what reasons the UK Border Agency made overpayments of £9.6 million in respect of accommodation and direct support to asylum seekers whose eligibility for the support had ceased. (309309)

The reasons for the overpayment of £9.6 million were set out in the notes to the Home Office Resource Accounts.

The notes also set out the actions taken by UK Border Agency to improve controls, these actions have been subject to continual review during the current financial year to ensure they have been effective.

Asylum: Housing

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many asylum seekers were supported in accommodation in each parliamentary constituency in (a) England and (b) Wales on the latest date for which figures are available. (309169)

A table showing asylum seekers supported in accommodation, by UK Government office region and parliamentary constituency, as at the end of September 2009, was made available in the Commons Library on 26 November 2009 as part of the quarterly publications.

Information on immigration and asylum are published annually and quarterly. Annual statistics and the latest statistics for Q3 2009 are available from the Library of the House and from the Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate web-site at:

http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/immigration-asylum-stats.html.

Control Orders

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people who have been but are no longer subject to a control order are resident in the UK. (308402)

[holding answer 6 January 2010]: As of 10 December 2009, the last date covered by the most recent written ministerial statement on control orders, 33 individuals had previously been but were no longer subject to a control order.

The Government are not willing to comment on the residential status of individuals who may or may not be of current interest to the intelligence agencies and the police beyond the information that has already appeared in the public domain in ministerial statements and answers to both Houses, and in open court judgments on control orders.

Counter-terrorism

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the (a) objectives and (b) terms of reference are of the Association of Chief Police Officers' Prevent Channel project for which his Department has provided funding. (308548)

The Channel Project provides a mechanism for ensuring that individuals identified as vulnerable to violent extremism are referred to and assessed by a multi-agency panel. The panel decides on the most appropriate action or intervention required to reduce this vulnerability. It therefore has a key role to play in driving delivery of Objective three of the Prevent Strategy: “Supporting vulnerable individuals who are being targeted and recruited to the cause of violent extremism”.

The Association of Chief Police Officers is responsible for national delivery of Channel, which is currently operating across 12 police forces.

Crime: Computers

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many (a) investigations, (b) prosecutions and (c) convictions were made for offences related to phishing attacks in each of the last three years; (306540)

(2) how many (a) investigations, (b) prosecutions and (c) convictions were made for offences related to spamming in each of the last three years; and if he will make a statement;

(3) how many (a) investigations, (b) prosecutions and (c) convictions there were for offences involving the deceptive installation of adware on to computer systems in each of the last three years.

Information on the number of investigations undertaken by the police is not collected centrally. The Home Office do collect data on the number of offences that are recorded by the police.

Phishing attacks, spamming and deceptive installation of adware are general terms. Specific offences, as defined in law, would be classified under the appropriate section of Computer Misuse Act 1990 dependent upon the circumstances of the individual offences. Such offences would then be recorded under Home Office classification 53B ‘Preserved other fraud and repealed fraud offences (Pre Fraud Act 2006)’. Offences recorded under individual sections of the Computer Misuse Act cannot be separately identified from the other offences recorded within this offence classification.

Prosecutions and convictions data are collected by the Ministry of Justice and are also related to offences as defined by legislation.

Departmental Fines

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what powers (a) his Department and (b) each of its agencies has to impose administrative penalties; what the statutory basis is for each such power; and how much (i) his Department and (ii) each of its agencies has recovered in administrative penalties in each of the last 10 years for which figures are available. (309293)

The Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 has provided a series of new sanctions for employers who employ illegal migrant workers. This includes a system of civil penalties, under which an employer can be fined up to £10,000 per person he/she is found to be employing illegally.

Additionally, Bulgarian and Romanian nationals who work illegally commit a criminal offence and may be served with a fixed penalty fine of £1,000 under criminal law.

Part II of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 enables the Secretary of State to impose a £2,000 fixed charge on any air or sea carrier for each non-European Economic Area passenger they bring to the UK who fails to produce, on request, a valid travel document satisfactorily establishing their identity and nationality and, if required, a valid visa.

The Department can also impose a civil penalty on those responsible for carrying clandestine entrants, concealed in a vehicle. The maximum penalty which can be imposed upon the owner/hirer of such a vehicle is £2,000 per clandestine and upon the driver £2,000 per clandestine, the aggregated maximum per clandestine (applied where more than one person is responsible) is £4,000.

The UK Borders Act 2007 enables the Secretary of State to make regulations requiring foreign nationals who are subject to immigration control apply for an Identity Card for Foreign Nationals. Failure to comply with such a requirement may result in the imposition of a sanction, which may include a civil financial penalty up to a maximum of £1,000.

The value of penalties recovered is set out in the table.

£000

2008-09

8,512

2007-08

6,844

2006-07

5,787

2005-06

5,932

2004-05

5,872

2003-04

6,843

2002-03

5,279

2001-02

6,783

2000-01

8,892

1999-2000

9,370

The police forces in England and Wales have the power to issue fixed penalty notices as a sanction against a specified list of offences, mainly related to public order (Penalty Notices for Disorder) and motoring.

For the Department's agencies, no penalties are levied.

Departmental Information and Communications Technology

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department on what pay band his Department's chief information officer (CIO) is employed; whether the CIO is employed on a fixed-term or permanent contract; and what the size is of the budget for which the CIO is responsible in the period 2009-10. (307563)

The chief information officer of the Home Office is employed in a substantive senior civil service pay band two post. The CIO is responsible for a delegated budget of £5,109,000 for 2009-10.

Departmental Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many officials work in the Office for Security and Counter-Terrorism; how many flights (a) within Great Britain and (b) overseas officials in the Office for Security and Counter-Terrorism took in 2008-09; and at what cost to the public purse. (301938)

As of 31 October, 397 civil servants worked in the Office for Security and Counter Terrorism (OSCT).

We estimate that during 2008-09, the OSCT spent some £22,000 on flights within Great Britain and some £264,000 on flights overseas. We do not keep a central record of the number of flights taken by officials and this cannot be provided without incurring disproportionate cost.

All travel by civil servants is undertaken in accordance with the guidelines set out in the Civil Service Management Code and any other guidance as applicable contained within Managing Public Money and the Treasury handbook on Regularity and Propriety.

Departmental Official Hospitality

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much (a) his Department and (b) its agencies spent on (i) alcohol and (ii) entertainment in the last 12 months. (305536)

The Home Office systems do not separately identify the cost of alcohol from overall entertainment costs, and this could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

However, we do retain records for hospitality provided by both civil servants and Ministers. The spend for 2008-09, the last 12 month period for which there are audited figures, was £50,371.

Home Office expenditure on official hospitality and entertainment conforms to departmental guidance on financial procedures and propriety, which complies with the principles of Managing Public Money and the Treasury handbook on Regularity and Propriety. Hospitality is defined as the provision of food, drink and entertainment of non-civil servants at modest cost where it is beneficial to the interests of the Department.

For the Department’s agencies, the Criminal Records Bureau and the Identity and Passport Service’s spend could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Departmental Pay

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much has been paid in bonuses to civil servants in his Department in each year since 2006. (306436)

Non-consolidated performance payments are an integral element of the staff reward package in the Home Office. They encourage and reward high performance. As non-consolidated payments, they have to be re-earned each year and do not add to future pay bill costs, for example pensions costs.

The Home Office (including the UK Border Agency), as part of its annual pay arrangements, pays non-consolidated performance related payments to up to 35 per cent. of its staff. There are separate arrangements for the Department’s senior staff, which are set by the Prime Minister for the whole senior civil service, following independent advice from the Senior Salaries Review Body.

In the financial years for which data are available the total salary bill for staff in the Home Office and UKB and the proportion of which was paid in non-consolidated performance payments was:

£ million

Total salary bill

Non-consolidated payments

2005-06

752

4.28

2006-07

723

4.45

2007-08

710

4.48

2008-09

791

4.75

It is also possible to give one-off non-consolidated special payments to members of staff in-year to reward exceptional achievements on a project or programme. The total cost of such payments in 2008-09 was £1.16 million the figure for 2007-08 was £2.56 million.

Departmental Publications

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when he expects his Department’s White Paper on policing to be published. (303710)

I refer the hon. Gentleman to my written ministerial statement of 2 December 2009, Official Report, column 127WS. The White Paper “Protecting the Public: Supporting the Police to Succeed” was published on 2 December 2009 at:

http://police.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/police-reform/protecting-the-public2835.pdf?view=Binary

Departmental Training

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many overseas training courses were attended by his Department’s civil servants in the latest period for which figures are available; how many civil servants attended each course; and what the total cost to the public purse was of each course. (305905)

Data are not collected centrally on the number and cost of Home Office staff who have attended overseas training courses, and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Deportation: Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much his Department spent on the removals process between 1 January and 1 December 2009. (309168)

It is not possible to provide this information in the format requested.

There are a range of costs, such as ticketing, escorting and detention costs that might be involved in removal and there are many staff involved in the removal process across the UK Border Agency, including seconded police officers. To disaggregate the funding and other resources in place to support the removals process from the overall budget and resources would incur disproportionate cost.

Entry Clearances: Overseas Students

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to the answer of 25 November 2009, Official Report, column 215W, on the sponsor register, how many institutions (a) have had an application to join the sponsor register refused and (b) have been removed from the register of licensed sponsors under Tier Four of the new immigration rules since 31 March 2009. (308320)

[holding answer 6 January 2010]: There have been 228 institutions that have had an application to join the sponsor register refused between 31 March 2009 and 21 December 2009 under Tier 4.

49 Tier 4 sponsors have been removed from the sponsor register between 31 March 2009 and 21 December 2009.

The figures quoted are not provided under National Statistics protocols and have been derived from local management information and are therefore provisional and subject to change.

Extradition: USA

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether his duty to assess the appropriateness of extraditing persons to the US in relation to health grounds applies (a) at the time of the receipt of the US application, (b) at the time of proceedings in the UK and (c) at the time immediately before the extradition takes place; and if he will make a statement. (308319)

[holding answer 6 January 2010]: In the scheme of the Extradition Act 2003, it falls to the courts to determine whether health factors raise a barrier to a person's extradition. However, the Home Secretary has an implied power to withdraw an extradition order where, exceptionally, a new matter arises subsequent to the completion of all proceedings under the Act but before extradition takes place. The basis for this implied power is section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998, which renders it unlawful for the Home Secretary, as a public authority, to act in a way which is incompatible with a convention right.

Firearms

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people in (a) England, (b) Sussex and (c) Lewes constituency were (i) killed and (ii) wounded by a firearm in each year since 1997. (308563)

[holding answer 6 January 2010]: Available information relates to crimes recorded by the police in which firearms (excluding air weapons) were reported to have been fired or used as a blunt instrument resulting in fatal and other injury. Data for England and the Sussex police force area, from 1997-98 up to and including 2007-08, are given in the following table. Constituency level data are not collected centrally.

Firearm offence statistics for 2008-09 will be published on 21 January2010.

Crimes recorded by the police in which firearms (excluding air weapons) were reported to have been used1 resulting in injury: England total and Sussex police force area, 1997-98 to 2007-08

Injury type

Fatal injury

Serious2 or slight injury

1997-98

England

52

745

Sussex

1

15

1998-993

England

50

807

Sussex

2

13

1999-2000

England

62

1,124

Sussex

16

2000-01

England

71

1,275

Sussex

13

2001-024

England

94

1,761

Sussex

2

40

2002-035

England

78

2,041

Sussex

1

20

2003-04

England

68

2,245

Sussex

1

9

2004-056

England

76

3,704

Sussex

25

2005-06

England

48

3,679

Sussex

23

2006-07

England

56

2,855

Sussex

1

23

2007-08

England

53

3,101

Sussex

17

1 Where firearms have been fired or used as a blunt instrument.

2 A serious injury is the one which necessitated detention in hospital or involved fractures, concussion, severe general shock, penetration by a bullet or multiple shot wounds.

3 There was a change in the counting rules for recorded crime on 1 April 1998.

4 Figures may have been inflated by some police forces implementing the principles of the National Crime Recording Standard before 1 April 2002.

5 The National Crime Recording Standard was introduced on 1 April 2002. Figures for some crime categories may have been inflated by this.

6 More explicit guidelines for the classification of weapons introduced on 1 April 2004 may have increased the recording of firearm offences, particularly those committed by imitation weapons.

Gangmasters Licensing Authority: Public Relations

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what payments the Gangmasters Licensing Authority has made to Cavendish Communications in the last 12 months; for what purpose; and if he will place in the Library a copy of the contract under which such payments have been made. (305152)

I have been asked to reply.

The Gangmasters Licensing Authority has not made any payments to Cavendish Communications in the last 12 months.

Hotels

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many hotel room nights were booked by officials in (a) his Department and (b) its agencies in each year since 2007; and how much (i) his Department and (ii) its agencies spent on fees of third party agents in relation to booking hotel accommodation in each such year. (309318)

The current contract for booking hotel rooms for the Home Office Headquarters, Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) and UKBA commenced in December 2008. Available information from this contract and since 2007 from the contract with the Identity and Passport Service on the number of nights booked by officials is as follows:

Hotel room nights

January 2007 to November 2008

December 2008 to November 2009

(a) Home Office Headquarters

1

12,345

(b) UKBA

1

16,356

(b) CRB

1

5,977

1Information unavailable.

Hotel room nights

2007

2008

20091

(b) IPS

6,159

10,165

9,376

1To 18 December 2009.

For the period from December 2008 to November 2009, the total fee of the third party agents relating to booking hotel accommodation for both the (i) Home Office Headquarters and (ii) CRB and UKBA equates to £144,469.

Information on hotel room nights booked and the hotel booking fee of the third party agents relating to the previous contract for the Home Office Headquarters and the UKBA for the period January 2007 to December 2008 is unavailable and to obtain it would incur disproportionate cost.

For the Identity and Passport Service the third-party agents booking fee is incorporated into the hotel room cost, and a separate figure is unavailable.

Expenditure is incurred in accordance with the principles of Managing Public Money and the Treasury handbook on Regularity and Propriety.

Immigration: Bexley

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what his most recent estimate is of the number of people in the London borough of Bexley who are awaiting a decision on an application for leave to remain in the UK; (302101)

(2) what estimate he has made of the number of people in the London borough of Bexley who made an application for leave to remain in the UK in the last 12 months.

The requested information is not collated and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost through the examination of individual case records.

Members: Correspondence

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when he plans to reply to the letter of 10 November 2009 from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton with regard to Mr. R. Z. Ullah. (307502)

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to the answer of 3 December 2009, Official Report, column 83W, on police, when the chief executive of the National Policing Improvement Agency will send a reply to the hon. Member for Wellingborough. (307812)

[holding answer 6 January 2010]: In the answer of 7 December (pursuant to holding answer of 3 December) I indicated that the matter had been passed to the NPIA for reply in June 2009. The chief executive of the National Policing Improvement Agency, Chief Constable Peter Neyroud, in fact wrote to the hon. Member on 30 June 2009 in response to his original query. I have sent the hon. Gentleman a copy of the letter following this parliamentary question.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when the Minister of State expects to reply to the letters from the right hon. Member for Berwick-upon-Tweed dated 29 June, 17 September and 9 November 2009 concerning spouse sponsorship. (308131)

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) when he plans to reply to the letter of 9 November 2009 from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton with regard to Ms S. Mpofu; (309153)

(2) when he plans to reply to the letter of 9 November 2009 from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton with regard to Mr. H. J. Kaabane;

(3) when he plans to reply to the letter of 9 November 2009 from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton with regard to Mr. A. Mortlock and Miss D. Taylor;

(4) when he plans to reply to the letter of 9 November 2009 from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton with regard to Mrs. K. Mirza;

(5) when he plans to reply to the letter of 11 November 2009 from the right hon. Member for Manchester Gorton with regard to Mr G. Singh;

(6) when he plans to reply to the letter of 11 November 2009 from the right hon. Member for Manchester Gorton with regard to Mr. M. A. Chaudhry.

Police Stations: Statistics

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department for what reasons his Department decided to stop recording the number of police stations operational in the UK in 2007; and if he will make a statement. (309227)

Previously information on the number of police stations opened and closed in England and Wales was collected centrally from police authorities via a yearly survey. The last full survey was for March 2007.

The data that the survey generated were not generally reliable. The management of the police estate and the allocation of resources are matters for police authorities and chief constables to determine.

In the interests of reducing bureaucracy, these data are no longer collected and held centrally.

Police: Complaints

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to the answer of 3 December 2009, Official Report, column 83W, on police, when the Independent Police Complaints Commission requested police forces to start providing information relating to complainant disability; and when the resultant data will be published. (307811)

[holding answer 6 January 2010]: As stated previously, the IPCC is responsible for the collation and publication of complaint statistics for England and Wales and has done so since it was established in 2004.

The IPCC first captured information relating to complainant disability in April 2009. However, the IPCC had concerns about the accuracy and quality of the data and did not include the data in its Complaints Statistics for 2008-09. The IPCC will not publish the data until it is confident of their quality and accuracy and is working with forces to ensure the quality and accuracy of the disability data on complaints statistics recorded by forces.

Police: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much funding his Department plans to provide to each police authority in 2010-11; and what mechanism is used to determine the allocation of funding to police authorities. (304013)

The provisional police funding settlement for 2010-11 was announced on 26 November 2009. Formula grant funding for all police authorities was provisionally set at £8.3 billion. The following table lists the grant allocation for each police authority.

Government funding for police authorities is chiefly allocated using a funding formula that distributes resources on the basis of relative need.

Table of police grant allocations by English and Welsh police authority 2009-10 to 2010-11

Police authority

2009-10 formula allocation 1(£ million)

2010-11 allocation1(£ million)

Change on 2009-10 formula allocation(percentage)

English shire authorities

Avon and Somerset

179.7

186.1

3.5

Bedfordshire

70.8

73.1

3.3

Cambridgeshire

81.0

83.5

3.0

Cheshire

120.5

123.5

2.5

Cleveland

97.7

100.1

2.5

Cumbria

67.2

68.9

2.5

Derbyshire

112.6

116.2

3.1

Devon and Cornwall

186.4

191.1

2.5

Dorset

65.3

66.9

2.5

Durham

91.4

93.7

2.5

Essex

177.9

183.1

2.9

Gloucestershire

59.3

60.8

2.5

Hampshire

207.5

213.0

2.7

Hertfordshire

121.2

124.9

3.0

Humberside

128.4

131.8

2.6

Kent

192.1

197.4

2.7

Lancashire

204.1

209.7

2.7

Leicestershire

118.0

121.4

2.9

Lincolnshire

64.3

66.3

3.2

Norfolk

87.6

89.8

2.5

North Yorkshire

76.7

78.6

2.5

Northamptonshire

75.5

77.5

2.7

Nottinghamshire

141.4

146.0

3.3

Staffordshire

120.6

123.8

2.7

Suffolk

71.0

72.7

2.5

Surrey

101.8

104.4

2.5

Sussex

169.8

174.1

2.5

Thames Valley

238.2

244.7

2.8

Warwickshire

54.1

55.6

2.7

West Mercia

121.8

124.9

2.5

Wiltshire

65.2

66.8

2.5

Shires total

3669.0

3770.0

2.8

English metropolitan authorities

Greater Manchester

458.9

472.5

3.0

Merseyside

267.4

274.3

2.6

Northumbria

249.9

256.2

2.5

South Yorkshire

204.1

209.2

2.5

West Midlands

486.1

504.3

3.8

West Yorkshire

339.2

350.5

3.3

Mets total

2005.7

2067.1

3.1

London authorities

GLA - Police

1978.3

2027.7

2.5

City of London2

21.0

21.8

N/A

English total

7674.0

7886.6

2.8

Welsh authorities

Dyfed-Powys3

54.4

55.8

2.5

Gwent3

82.6

84.7

2.5

North Wales3

80.1

82.1

2.5

South Wales3

181.5

186.4

2.7

Welsh total

398.6

409.0

2.6

Total

8072.6

8295.7

2.7

1 Rounded to the nearest £100,000. Grant as calculated under the Local Government Finance Report (England) and Local Government Finance (No.2—Provisional Settlement Police Authorities) Report (Wales). Table includes the effects of floors and scaling.

2 Figures for the City of London relate to Home Office Grant only as calculated in the Police Grant Report (England and Wales). Revenue support grant is allocated to the Common Council of the City of London as a whole in respect of all its functions. The City is grouped with education authorities for the purposes of grant floors.

3 Welsh figures include Home Office floor funding.

Police: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) police officers and (b) police civilian staff are employed in Gloucester; and what the equivalent figures were in 1997. (308231)

[holding answer 6 January 2010]: Police personnel statistics are not collected by parliamentary constituency. Data for police officers have been collected by Basic Command Unit (BCU) since April 2001 and data for police staff have been collected by BCU since April 2002.

There were 292 police officers in Forest and Gloucester BCU as at 31 March 2002 and 359 police officers as at 31 March 2009.

There were 69 police staff in Forest and Gloucester BCU as at 31 March 2003 and 114 police staff as at 31 March 2009.

Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department with reference to his Department's publication, “Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000: Consolidating Orders and Codes of Practice Summary of Responses”, page 18, if he will place in the Library a copy of the response from (a) the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health, (b) the Chartered Institution of Waste Management, (c) the British Broadcasting Corporation, (d) the Department of Communities and Local Government/Fire Services in England, (e) the National Undercover Working Group Legal Group, (f) the Chief Surveillance Commissioner and (g) Interception of Communications Commissioner. (308651)

The Home Office intends to publish all responses on its website and will do so shortly. Copies of the responses will also be placed in the Library.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department with reference to his Department's publication, Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000: Consolidating Orders and Codes of Practice Summary of Responses, page 16, which of the 41 respondents supported local authority use of the Act for dog fouling, littering or school enrolment checking. (308653)

Seven were from members of the public, three identified themselves as individuals from local authorities and the remaining 31 were responses from local authorities.

Religious Buildings: Registration

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department with reference to the answer of 28 October 2009, Official Report, column 474W, on “Non-domestic Rates: Religious Buildings”, which organisations have had applications to be certified under the Places of Worship Registration Act 1855 rejected by the Registrar General since 1979. (308766)

The Places of Worship Registration Act 1855 (the Act) provides for places of meeting for religious worship, excluding those belonging to the Established Church, to be certified to the Registrar General. A number of tests are applied by the Registrar General when a place of meeting for religious worship is certified to him. This includes the application of the judgment by the Court of Appeal in the Segerdal case in 1970. The main finding in the judgment is that the words ‘place of meeting for religious worship’ in the Act connote a place of which the principal use is for people to come together as a congregation to worship God or do reverence to a deity. A further test is whether the principal use of the building is for worship or for other matters, such as a private home or social club.

Once the Registrar General is satisfied that the place of worship certified to him is capable of recognition, he adds it to the register of such places which, under the Act, he has a duty to maintain.

The duty placed on the Registrar General does not extend to maintaining and retaining records of places or organisations that are not capable of recognition as places of worship under the Act, and the records held in this respect by the Registrar General are incomplete. However, the records that the Registrar General does hold confirm that since 1979, the following organisations have made unsuccessful applications for buildings certified as places of worship to be added to the register:

Miracle Revival Assembly

Calvary Full Gospel Church

Christians not otherwise designated

Roman Catholics

The Methodist Church

Who object to be designated by any distinctive Religious Appellation

Order of Christ Spirit

Christian Spiritualist

Jehovah’s Witnesses

Centre for Christ

Pentecostal Assemblies of God

Baptists

Mount Zion Holiness Assembly

Church of Christ

Christian Fellowship in Huddersfield

Interdenomination

Christians Nazarenes Methodist and Pentecostal

First Church of Christ, Scientist

Wentworth Road Christian Fellowship

Assemblies of God

Llanelli Baptist

Great Conrad Free Church

Calvary Church of God

Church of God

Good News Church Macclesfield

The Spiritualist Sanctuary

German Speaking Evangelical Lutheran Congregation

The Order of Women Freemasons

Muslims

Gur Sangat

Orthodox Christians

Cramlington Spiritualist Church

Frankley Methodist /Anglican Church

Fellowship of Churches of Christ

God’s Church of Peace

Penzance Christian Fellowship

Nailsea Christian Fellowship

Pentwyn Christian Fellowship

Officers and Members of Emmanuel Pentecostal Faith Church of God

Church of Christ of Bethlehem

Weybridge United Reformed Church

Horringer Court Christian Fellowship

Christchurch Abbeydale

Brotherhood Movement

Caribbean House Chaplaincy

Greater World Christian Spiritualist Association

The Independent African Caribbean Church of Christ of Nazareth

The Pentecostal Evangelistic Assembly

Letchworth Lodge of the Theosophical Society in England

The Holiness Church of God Inc.

The Othona Community

Trinity Church of Christ

The New Benedictine Order

The Spiritualists National Union Redwoods

Redditch Christian Fellowship

The British Sailor’s Society

Emmanuel Christian Fellowship

Highfield Free Church

Good News Church

Hammarens Ordens Sallskap—The Order of the Hammer

Apostolic Church of God Seventh Day

Mechanics

Korean Presbyterian Church

Coptic Orthodox Church

United Reformed Church

The Ashford Christian Spiritualist Church

Universal Life Church

Amazing Grace and Friends

Tavistock Community Church

Apostolics

Trinity Church of Christ

Church of England and United Reformed Church

Confucians (Buddhists, Goddess of Mercy)

Apostolic Church International (in UK)

Members of the Correllian Nativist Church International

Buddhists (New Kadampa Tradition)

Cantheist

Freedom Family Church

Redeemed Christian Church of God

C.J’s City

St. Andrews Church of God

Wiccan

Life Sanctuary Church

Kriya Yoga Ashram

Jesus Christ The Great Salvation Fellowship

Mount Sion Apostolic Church of Jesus Christ

Security: Olympic Games 2012

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether there are plans to contract private security firms for the 2012 Olympics. (308811)

The Private Security Industry will play a role in delivering a safe and secure Olympic and Paralympic games. LOCOG, the London Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games, will require an estimated 6,000 people to protect their assets, protect the perimeters of their venues, screen people and vehicles entering the venues and also to work as safety stewards in the venues.

The Olympic and Paralympic Security Directorate (OSD) within the office for security and counter-terrorism (OSCT) of the Home Office is supporting an innovative project called ‘Bridging the Gap’ which aims to train up to 10,000 young adults to Security Industry Authority standards to fill these roles. The OSD is working closely with the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), LOCOG and the ‘Bridging the Gap’ project to ensure that sufficient numbers are trained and that there is a legacy for the young people in terms of job opportunities in the Private Security Industry, and other uniform services after the games. The OSD is also engaging the Private Security Industry to ensure they are aware of the challenge ahead, not just in securing the games, but also in ensuring that levels of service to businesses elsewhere in the UK are maintained.

Terrorism Act 2000

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many students have been (a) stopped, (b) detained and (c) arrested under the Terrorism Act 2000 in the last five years. (301037)

The Home Office does not hold statistics which are recorded in this way. However, the Home Office collates statistics on the number of terrorism arrests and these were included in a Bulletin published for the first time on 13 May 2009 (Statistics on Terrorism Arrests and Outcomes Great Britain 11 September 2001 to 31 March 2008). The first edition of the Bulletin is available at:

http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs09/hosb0409.pdf

The second issue of the Bulletin was published on 26 November 2009 and is available via the link below:

http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs09/hosb1809.pdf

UK Border Agency

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the budget is of the UK Border Agency Abu Dhabi hub for 2009-10. (301241)

Abu Dhabi is the regional operations centre for the Gulf and Pakistan, dealing with visa applications from Iran, Pakistan, Bahrain, Abu Dhabi and Dubai. Abu Dhabi will be the largest UK Border Agency operation overseas by application volume. There are 142 staff.

Abu Dhabi carries out the full range of tasks associated with visa processing, including the administration, pre-assessment and assessment of visa applications, document verification, post-decision work, including appeals, administrative reviews, correspondence and complaints handling, risk and airline liaison, integrity management, and regional management.

Under the finance model agreed with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, upon whose platform the Abu Dhabi hub operates, the budget is not constructed in a way that accounts for particular posts.

The costs passed to the UK Border Agency from the FCO are a combination of variable costs, such as those related to headcount, and fixed charges such as management support and depreciation. The variable costs paid by the UK Border Agency for 2009-10 are around £6.5 million. The fixed element for the Abu Dhabi hub cannot easily be disaggregated from the global total and to do so would incur disproportionate costs.

UK Border Agency: Empty Property

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department with reference to pages 80 and 81 of his Department’s Resource Accounts 2008-09, for what reasons the UK Border Agency made payments of £1.3 million to landlords for empty properties. (309310)

A large estate such as that occupied by the UK Border Agency is likely to have some surplus property at times, especially as it is consolidating the number of properties it has to deliver better value for the taxpayer overall. Where a property is empty the Agency is required to declare the costs associated with that property while UKBA retains the lease. In 2008-09 payments for the empty properties were £1,072 million, comprising rent, rates, and a nominal amount for utilities. This represents 1 per cent. of the cost of running the UKBA estate. Overall the agency has benefited from reduced property, IT and productivity gains from rationalisation that outweigh these costs.

Vehicle Intelligence Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the (a) objectives and (b) scope is of the Association of Chief Police Officers’ Vehicle Intelligence Scheme which receives funding from his Department. (308549)

The purpose of the ACPO Vehicle Crime Intelligence Service (AVCIS) is to retain a strategic overview of issues affecting the UK specifically with regard to vehicle crime and vehicle enabled crime in order to maintain reductions in vehicle crime and vehicle enabled crime in the UK; improve recovery rates of stolen vehicles; and identify emerging threats and trends, developing a range of tactical options which are effective, timely and proportionate.

In order to deliver against its purpose, all the activities of AVCIS are categorised within six aims:

to reduce theft of vehicles;

to reduce theft from vehicles;

to increase recovery of stolen vehicles;

to reduce vehicle fraud;

to deliver bureau functions (including TruckPol); and

to develop AVCIS capability to deliver against its aims.

AVCIS delivers against this remit through close partnership with local police forces and regional intelligence units and national law enforcement agencies such as UKBA, SOCA and HMRC. It also works very closely with partners in the private sector, including insurers, manufacturers, vehicle tracking companies and others.

Vetting

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department on how many checks undertaken by the Criminal Records Bureau a dispute was (a) raised and (b) upheld in each year since 2002, broken down by reason for the dispute. (302193)

The following table details a breakdown of the number of checks undertaken by the Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) which were the subject of a dispute since the launch of the Disclosure service in 2002. Officials at the Bureau have advised me that they have recently performed a data cleansing exercise which has resulted in some changes to the previous figures disclosed. I have been assured that this exercise has now been completed.

2002-032003-042004-052005-062006-072007-082008-092009-10Total

Error type

Raised

Upheld

Raised

Upheld

Raised

Upheld

Raised

Upheld

Raised

Upheld

Raised

Upheld

Raised

Upheld

Raised

Upheld

Raised

Upheld

Department for education and skills and Department of children schools and families

0

0

3

3

5

5

4

3

10

8

23

15

20

12

15

11

80

57

Department of health

1

1

0

0

2

2

3

3

7

5

8

1

4

1

2

2

27

15

Identification error

0

0

2

2

0

0

3

3

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

6

6

Local police force

108

108

321

318

619

602

794

764

804

656

1,787

678

2,378

926

1,302

567

8,113

4619

Other (data cleansing)

569

121

1,189

151

1,280

26

1,456

38

1,467

11

89

1

13

0

11

0

6,074

348

Police national computer (PNC)

408

408

796

792

930

892

1,004

920

1,043

748

3,538

1,297

2,495

810

1,015

332

11,229

6,199

Police national computer identification

588

473

766

621

775

762

667

648

740

683

954

586

1,296

778

647

471

6,433

5,022

System error

0

0

0

0

2

2

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

3

2

Uncategorized

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

8

0

32

0

932

0

972

0

Total

1,674

1,111

3,077

1,887

3,613

2,291

3,931

2,379

4,072

2,112

6,408

2,578

6,238

2,527

3,924

1,383

32,937

16,268

Vetting: Councillors

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether the (a) Independent Safeguarding Authority and (b) Criminal Records Bureau has provided guidance to local authorities on the undertaking of checks in respect of councillors. (308691)

It is the Home Office, working with other Government Departments, rather than the Independent Safeguarding Authority and the Criminal Records, which is responsible for preparing guidance on the operation of the Vetting and Barring Scheme.

The Home Office is working with the Department for Communities and Local Government and policy leads in the Department of Health/Department of Children Schools and Families to produce specific guidance on the requirements introduced by the Vetting and Barring Scheme for elected members and other local authority officials. Information on the Vetting and Barring scheme has been issued that allows individuals and organisations to assess where they fall under the scheme. This is being supplemented by comprehensive generic guidance and sector specific guidance where required. All of the guidance will be in place by July 2010.

Work and Pensions

Departmental Art Works

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how much her Department spent on art works in the last 12 months. (306439)

Works of art displayed in the Department for Work and Pensions are from the Government Art Collection (GAC), which publishes an annual list of acquisitions. The most recent details of acquisitions made by the GAC were published on 5 October 2009 and are available on the GAC website at:

http://www.gac.culture.gov.uk/information/publications.asp

Departmental Assets

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what assets of her Department are planned to be sold in each year from 2009-10 to 2013-14; what the (a) description and (b) book value of each such asset is; what the expected revenue from each such sale is; and if she will make a statement. (300376)

The Government have stated their intention to realise £16 billion in asset disposals over the period 2011-14 and will publish further details of opportunities to commercialise business assets in the coming weeks.

One of this Department’s key investment strategies during the 2004 spending review period was to reduce asset ownership, and contract for key services. The successful implementation of that strategy resulted in a greatly reduced asset base.

The DWP does not own any land or property. Asset transfer has already been completed through a PFI contract known as PRIME, returning exchequer receipts of £250 million in 1998 and £100 million in 2003 when DWP outsourced its estate. This arrangement covers the majority of property occupied by the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (a Crown non-departmental public body). There is currently no intention to sell any of the Commission’s assets during the years in question.

Planned asset sales for the Health and Safety Executive (a Crown Non-departmental public body) are outlined in the following table:

£000

Vechicles1

Land

2009-10

NBV

235

5

Sales

262

1

2010-11

NBV

362

10

Sales

362

10

2011-12

NBV

347

0

Sales

347

0

2012-13

NBV

277

0

Sales

277

0

2013-14

NBV

362

0

Sales

362

0

1 Vehicle sales are mainly related to the Health and Safety Executive’s Private User Scheme which provides vehicles on a three year contract for staff travelling in excess of 5,000 business miles per annum on a shared cost basis.

The DWP disposed of the majority of its vehicle fleet in August 2007. The Department’s IS/IT and telephony requirements were outsourced to EDS (now part of Hewlett Packard) and BT in 2005.

Leasehold improvements to Jobcentre Plus sites are classed as assets but cannot be disposed of independently so the impact on value is negligible, as the assets themselves (the buildings) are not owned by the Department.

Departmental Conferences

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many (a) away days and (b) conferences that took place outside her Department’s building attended by civil servants in her Department there have been since 2005; and what the cost was of each. (307513)

The information requested is not collated centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how much was spent by her Department and its agencies on conferences they organised which were subsequently cancelled in each of the last three years; and what the title was of each such conference. (308837)

The information requested is not available centrally and could be collected only at disproportionate cost.

Departmental Consultants

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many external consultants work for her Department. (303243)

Where DWP contracts for consultancy support it does so primarily by reference to the outcomes or services to be delivered and not by reference to a given number of consultants. Accordingly, the Department does not hold centralised information on the number of consultants being employed on such contracts at any point in time.

Departmental Electronic Equipment

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many plasma screen televisions her Department has purchased since 2001; and what the cost has been of purchasing and installing such screens in each such year. (306068)

The number of plasma screen televisions purchased on behalf of the Department, including related costs, are as set out in the following table:

Number

Cost (£)

2006-07

3

2,264

2007-08

9

4,725

2008-09

5

2,344

2009-10

9

2,770

Information prior to 2006-07 could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

Departmental Information and Communications Technology

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions on what pay band her Department’s Chief Information Officer (CIO) is employed; whether the CIO is employed on a fixed-term or permanent contract; and what the size is of the budget for which the CIO is responsible in the period 2009-10. (307555)

The Department’s chief information officer is employed within the senior civil service pay band 3 on a permanent contract. He is responsible for a budget of £1,191 million in 2009-10.

Departmental Information Officers

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many full-time equivalent press officers (a) are employed by and (b) work for her Department. (303610)

The number of press officers employed by the Department in its national press office and across the English regions, Scotland and Wales for the last accounting year 2008-09 is 38. In addition to their responsibilities to the Department for Work and Pensions, they provide services for Jobcentre Plus and The Pension, Disability and Carers Service.

Departmental Legislation

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what criminal offences have been (a) abolished and (b) created by primary legislation sponsored by her Department since 1 May 2008. (303259)

The information is as follows:

The Pensions Act 2008 created the following offences:

(i) a wilful failure by an employer to comply with the duties to automatically enrol or re-enrol their employees into pension saving, or allow them to opt into pension saving. These enrolment and opt in duties are set out in sections 3(2), 5(2) and 7(3) of the Pensions Act 2008 and the offence is at section 45 of the Act;

(ii) an existing offence of providing false or misleading information (Pensions Act 2004) was amended. It now includes information which must be provided to the Pensions Regulator by employers about action they have taken or intend to take for the purposes of their duties under the Pensions Act enrolment provisions.

The Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008 created the following offences:

Sections 32D and 32K of the Child Support Act 1991 (as inserted by sections 22 and 23 of the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008) create the offences of failure to comply with the requirements of an order made under sections 32A (regular deduction order), 32E (interim lump sum deduction order) and 32F (final lump sum deduction order), these sections also contain a power to designate any regulations made under sections 32C and 32J as falling within the scope of the offence.

Section 36 of the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008 created a regulation making power to impose a duty of failing to notify a change of address on a person liable to make payments of child support maintenance. The power when exercised would set the duty out in the Child Support Information Regulations 2008. The offence is inserted into section 14A of the Child Support Act 1991.

The Welfare Reform Act 2009 created the following offences:

Section 55 of the Welfare Reform Act 2009 substitutes the provision made by section 36 of the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2009 extending the duty and the scope of the offence to include failure to notify any other change of circumstances.

Section 51 of the Welfare Reform Act 2009 inserts section 39CA into the Child Support Act 1991, to require persons against whom an order disqualifying a person from holding a driving licence or travel authorisation is made to surrender the document within a required period (seven days beginning with the start of the period for which the order has effect) and where there is good reason for not surrendering within that period, as soon as reasonably practicable after the end of that period. A person who fails to comply with this requirement commits an offence.

Departmental Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many staff of her Department were in its redeployment pool on 1 (a) January, (b) April, (c) July and (d) October 2009. (306710)

The Department does not have a redeployment pool. Any members of staff who become surplus unavoidably because of organisational or other changes are managed within normal lines of management.

Departmental Official Hospitality

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how much (a) her Department and (b) its agencies spent on (i) alcohol and (ii) entertainment in the last 12 months. (305528)

The information is as follows:

Alcohol

The Department does not currently keep a separate record of expenditure on alcohol for hospitality purposes. Such expenditure is included within the hospitality account. Expenditure on alcohol and entertaining is based on the principles set out in Managing Public Money and the Treasury handbook on Regularity, Propriety and Value for Money. Accordingly, alcohol is provided only as an exception and then only with the specific written authority of a small number of designated Senior Civil Servants.

Entertainment

Departmental expenditure on hospitality to the end of the financial year 2008-09 was £82,362. This is broken down as follows:

£

Jobcentre Plus

6,970

Pensions, Disability and Carers Service

11,509

Corporate

63,883

Total

82,362

The 2008-09 published accounts show expenditure on hospitality as £116,652. This figure includes expenditure incurred by the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (£5,691) and the Health and Safety Executive (£28,599) which are non-Departmental Public Bodies.

Employment Schemes: Young People

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what criteria will be used to determine which of those aged 18 to 24 years old will be covered by (a) the young person’s guarantee and (b) the flexible New Deal; and if she will estimate the number in each such group in 2010-11. (306356)

Beginning from January 2010, all jobseekers aged between 18 and 24 will have access to the Young Person’s Guarantee. As the Chancellor announced in the pre-Budget report, any young person on Jobseeker’s Allowance for six months or more will now be guaranteed an offer of a job, work-focussed training or work experience.

In Flexible New Deal Phase One areas, young people will be offered a place on the Young Person’s Guarantee after six months of unemployment, and will be referred to the Flexible New Deal when they reach 12 months of unemployment.

In Flexible New Deal Phase Two areas, the New Deal for Young People will continue to run until the Flexible New Deal goes live in October 2010. In these areas, young people will also be offered a place on the Young Person’s Guarantee from six months, the only difference being that if they choose to take up training or a work experience place these will be delivered through the New Deal options.

The information on the number of people who will be participating is not available, as we do not project unemployment figures.

Housing Benefit

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what estimate has been made of the expenditure by local authorities on housing benefit administration in (a) 2005-06, (b) 2006-07, (c) 2007-08 and (d) 2008-09. (309532)

The Department does not hold information on local authorities' expenditure on housing benefit administration.

Such information as is available for local authorities in England is a matter for my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; in Scotland it is a matter for the Scottish Parliament; and in Wales it is a matter for the National Assembly for Wales.

Jobseeker's Allowance

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (1) how many and what proportion of jobseeker's allowance claims were not processed (a) within the Jobcentre Plus target time and (b) within the national average time in each (i) Jobcentre Plus district and (ii) region in each of the last 12 months; and if she will make a statement; (302242)

(2) how long on average it took to process a claim for jobseeker's allowance in each (a) region and (b) Jobcentre Plus district in each month since February 2009; how many unprocessed jobseeker's allowance claims there were in (i) total and (ii) each region in each month since February 2009; and if she will make a statement.

The administration of Jobcentre Plus is a matter for the chief executive of Jobcentre Plus, Darra Singh. I have asked him to provide the hon. Member with the information requested.

Letter from Darra Singh:

The Secretary of State has asked me to reply to your questions asking how many and what proportion of jobseeker's allowance (JSA) claims were not processed (a) within the Jobcentre Plus target time and (b) within the national average time in each (i) Jobcentre Plus district and (ii) region in each of the last 12 months; and if she will make a statement and how long on average it took to process a claim for JSA in each (a) region and (b) Jobcentre Plus district in each month since February 2009; how many unprocessed jobseeker's allowance claims there were in (i) total and (ii) each region in each month since February 2009; and if she will make a statement. This is something which falls within the responsibilities delegated to me as Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus.

Information is not available down to District level as JSA claims are processed at our Benefit Delivery Centres. The Management Information supplied will be for each Benefit Delivery Centre and Region.

Jobcentre Plus gathers information on the volume of outstanding claims from its internal benefit processing systems. As claims are received in Benefit Delivery Centres they are recorded on this system. The count of outstanding claims is a snap shot, of which claims have yet to be fully processed to the point a decision is made on entitlement, on the last working day of every month. The data provided may also slightly under estimate the volume of claims outstanding as some cases could be in transit and/or be waiting to be logged onto the system.

Jobcentre Plus has a target for the average actual clearance time taken to process JSA claims. The current target is 11.5 days. This time is calculated across an average of all the claims cleared in any given month looking at the date the customer first contacted Jobcentre Plus or the customers first day of unemployment, whichever is the later. The end date is the date a formal decision is made on the claim and a notification is issued to the customer on entitlement.

Jobcentre Plus does not hold information on what volume or proportion of JSA claims were not processed within the Jobcentre Plus target time (11.5 days) and within the national average time (10.1 days, Year to 31.10.09). However, it does hold information on the volume of claims that were processed within 0-5 days, 0-10 days, 0-16 days, and 0-21 days. Jobcentre Plus's Management Information systems do not hold information on proportions—these would need to be clerically calculated from the information provided.

The information that is available to answer your first question has been placed in the Library.

Information on average clearance times for JSA claims and volumes of outstanding claims for the period from February to April 2009 for each Benefit Delivery Centre and Region has been placed in the Library. Information on average clearance times for JSA claims and volumes of outstanding claims for the period from May to October 2009 was placed in the Library on 27 November 2009 in answer to your question: how many unprocessed JSA claims there were in each (a) region and (b) Jobcentre Plus district in each of the last six months; what the average time taken to process claims in each instance was (PQ 300684).

Local Housing Allowance

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions with reference to the answer to the hon. Member for Meriden of 15 June 2009, Official Report, column 48W, on local housing allowance, what the timetable is for removal of the £15 excess. (309381)

On 7 December 2009 the pre-Budget report announced that the Government had decided not to implement the withdrawal of the £15 excess in April 2010.

The Government are considering all aspects of the local housing allowance alongside its wider strategy for housing benefit reform in its consultation document “Supporting People in to Work: The Next Stage of Housing Benefit Reform”. Our proposals will ensure that housing benefit is better able to help people into work, is fairer, more efficiently delivered and represents good value for money for the taxpayer.

National Insurance

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many applicants for national insurance numbers have been refused national insurance numbers following right-to-work interviews in each quarter since July 2006. (301779)

The available information is in the table:

National insurance number refusals following right to work interviews in each quarter since July 2006

Quarter 1 April-June

Quarter 2 July-September

Quarter 3 October-December

Quarter 4 January-March

Total

2006-07

825

968

1,801

3,594

2007-08

1,936

1,902

1,638

1,643

7,119

2008-09

1,562

2,526

3,106

2,668

9,862

2009-10

2,641

n/a

n/a

n/a

2,641

“—” Indicates no data available as the period was before the introduction of the right to work test.

n/a = Not yet available.

Note:

The right to work test was introduced in July 2006

Source:

Jobcentre Plus Management Information

New Deal Schemes

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the cost to the public purse of the New Deal Gateway to Work programme was in the last 12 months; and how many participants the programme has had in each year since its inception. (303030)

The New Deal Gateway to Work programme is a component of both the New Deal for Young People and the New Deal 25 Plus.

The cost of the New Deal Gateway to Work programme in the 12 months to March 2009 for the 18 to 24-year-old client group was £41.4 million.

For the age 25-plus client group, it is not possible to identify the costs of the New Deal Gateway to Work programme separately from other types of provision undertaken during the gateway period. This is because expenditure on this provision is not recorded separately from other provisions. The total cost of all gateway provision for the 25 plus year old client group was £15.8 million in the 12 months to March 2009.

The following table sets out the number of participants who have started on the Gateway to Work provision for each year since inception.

Starters on the Gateway to Work course—a component of New Deal

Financial year

New Deal for Young People

New Deal 25 Plus

Combined New Deal for Young People and New Deal 25 Plus

2001-02

44,990

3,480

48,470

2002-03

51,730

7,430

59,160

2003-04

50,410

11,730

62,140

2004-05

43,470

12,470

55,940

2005-06

49,710

8,190

57,900

2006-07

60,310

6,900

67,210

2007-08

58,140

13,910

72,050

2008-09

67,800

13,860

81,660

Notes:

1. Figures rounded to the nearest 10.

2. The Gateway to Work course was introduced to New Deal for Young People in July 2000, so the first full year data is for 2001-02.

3. A pilot in a number of Districts for New Deal 25 Plus ended in March 2006, followed by optional use nationally.

Source:

Department for Work and Pensions, Information Directorate

Social Security Benefits

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what guidance her Department gives people whose benefit claims are rejected or withdrawn on grounds of excess capital on what future rundown of capital will be regarded as reasonable. (302542)

If a customer is not entitled to an income-related benefit due to excess capital a decision notice will be issued to the customer that includes reasons for the disallowance and details of their right to a reconsideration of the decision and, where appropriate, to an appeal. Customers are also informed that they will need to reapply if their circumstances change, in order for eligibility to be reassessed. No specific advice is given as to the future rundown of capital in these cases. This is because subsequent decisions on whether deprivations have occurred are a matter of judgement by independent decision makers.

If it is established that the customer has deliberately deprived themselves of capital in order to obtain income- related benefits, the customer will be treated as still possessing that capital when assessing entitlement to benefit. Their claim will be subject to a calculation to determine at what point this notional capital would have been expected to reduce below the capital limit and so enable the customer to make a new claim. The calculation is based on the prevailing benefit rates. The customer will be given details of the calculation in their case, together with the rights of review and, where appropriate, appeal.

Social Security Benefits: Grandparents

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions for which benefits and allowances administered by her Department a retired grandparent is entitled to claim in respect of a grandchild who is being fostered by that grandparent. (306721)

I refer the hon. Member to the written answer given to the hon. Member for Birmingham, Northfield (Richard Burden) on 15 December 2009, Official Report, columns 1009-10W.

Work Capability Assessment

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions pursuant to the oral statement of 15 December 2009, Official Report, columns 818-20, on benefit reform, what changes to the work capability assessment (a) would be desirable and (b) are planned. (308845)

[holding answer 6 January 2010]: We are currently reviewing the work capability assessment with the help of a range of stakeholders and medical professionals. We believe there are some changes that could be made and plan to publish a report detailing these once the review is complete.

Women and Equality

Departmental Cost Effectiveness

To ask the Minister for Women and Equality what efficiency savings projects the Government Equalities Office put in place under the Operational Efficiency Programme; on what date each such project was initiated; how much each such project was expected to contribute to the Office’s savings; how much had been saved through each such project on the latest date for which figures are available; and if she will make a statement. (300943)

The Government Equalities Office is outside the remit of the Operational Efficiency Programme as it employs less than 250 people.

Departmental Domestic Visits

To ask the Minister for Women and Equality on how many occasions she visited (a) Scotland, (b) Wales and (c) Northern Ireland in an official capacity in the last 12 months. (303495)

The Ministers for Women and Equality have made the following visits since November 2008.

(a) Scotland

Visits made

Minister for Women and Equality (Harriet Harman)

3

Deputy Minister for Women and Equality (Maria Eagle)

0

Parliamentary Secretary (Michael Jabez Foster)

1

Solicitor-General and Equality Bill Lead (Vera Baird)

1

(b) Wales

Visits made

Minister for Women and Equality (Harriet Harman)

1

Deputy Minister for Women (Maria Eagle)

1

Parliamentary Secretary (Michael Jabez Foster)

2

Solicitor-General and Equality Bill Lead (Vera Baird)

0

(c) Northern Ireland

None. Equality is a devolved matter for the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Departmental Electronic Equipment

To ask the Minister for Women and Equality how many plasma screen televisions the Government Equalities Office has purchased since its inception; and what the cost has been of purchasing and installing such screens in each such year. (306082)

Justice

Council Tax: Non-payment

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) with reference to the answer to the hon. Member for North West Norfolk of 18 May 2009, Official Report, column 1214W, on council tax: non-payment, how many applications for liability orders were made to each magistrates' court in 2008-09; (308525)

(2) what assessment he has made of the reason for the increase in applications for liability orders.

The table shows the number of applications for council tax and business rate liability orders made within each accounting centre in 2008-09.

The figures have been extracted from the intranet fees accounting system (IFAS). Fee income and volume are captured by accounting centres in IFAS. Some accounting centres comprise of more than one magistrates court. However, some of these accounting centres merge the management information which means it is not possible to supply data at individual court level.

Applications for liability orders attract the same fee charge, and are therefore recorded on the IFAS in the same way. It is not therefore possible to distinguish between applications for liability orders made in relation to council tax and business rates.

The overall number of applications made in 2008-09 as shown (3,121,089) is marginally different from my answer (3,124,406) to the hon. Member for North-West Norfolk (Mr. Bellingham) of 18 May 2009, Official Report, columns 1214-1215W. The latter figure was extracted from the IFAS database at the time the hon. Member for North-West Norfolk tabled his question, but in order to obtain a breakdown by accounting centre, data have been re-extracted from the IFAS. The IFAS is a “live” database, meaning that, inevitably, the normal course of regular system updating means that various additions, deletions, amendments and corrections will have been made to the data it contains relating to applications in 2008-09, giving rise to the marginal difference.

Enforcement action in respect of non-payment of council tax is entirely a matter for local authorities. The Ministry of Justice has made no assessment of the reasons behind the increase in council tax liability orders.

Number of applications for council tax liability orders made by accounting centre in England and Wales, 2008-09

Accounting centre

Number

City of London Magistrates

1,525

Horseferry Road Magistrates

26,826

Bexley Magistrates

7,035

Bromley Magistrates

8,957

Camberwell Green Magistrates

81,412

Croydon Magistrates

20,786

Greenwich Magistrates

29,837

Kingston-upon-Thames Magistrates

6,855

Richmond-upon-Thames Magistrates

9,141

London—West Group Magistrates

82,726

Wimbledon Magistrates

21,182

South Western Magistrates

15,935

London North East Area Magistrates

133,815

Barnet Magistrates

7,160

Hendon Magistrates

16,333

Brent Magistrates

29,010

Enfield Magistrates

19,585

Harrow Magistrates

5,854

Highbury Corner Magistrates

48,092

Haringey Magistrates

16,453

Uxbridge Magistrates

13,569

Bedfordshire Magistrates

47,465

Cambridgeshire Magistrates

27,536

Essex Magistrates—Civil

80,578

Hertfordshire Central Accounting Unit

21,905

Kent Central Finance Unit—East Kent Magistrates— Finance Centre

25,575

Kent Central Finance Unit—North and Central Kent Magistrates

50,728

Norfolk Magistrates

41,269

Suffolk Magistrates Court

37,912

Surrey Magistrates—Central Finance Unit

35,381

Sussex Magistrates

80,870

Central Buckinghamshire Magistrates—Aylesbury

34,828

Oxfordshire Magistrates

27,277

Berkshire Magistrates—Reading

42,763

Bath Magistrates

3,452

Bristol Magistrates

24,733

Taunton Magistrates

7,442

North Somerset Magistrates

12,840

North Avon Magistrates—Yate

9,041

South Somerset Magistrate

9,491

Devon and Cornwall—North Devon Magistrates

3,583

Devon and Cornwall—East Cornwall Magistrates

14,924

Devon and Cornwall—West Cornwall Magistrates

9,428

Devon and Cornwall—Central Devon Magistrates

9,413

Devon and Cornwall—South Devon Magistrates

11,057

Devon and Cornwall—Plymouth District Magistrates

18,183

Dorset Magistrates—Central Finance Office

41,821

Gloucestershire Magistrates—Central Finance Office

27,696

Wiltshire—Swindon Magistrates

25,667

Hampshire and Isle of Wight—North East and North West Hampshire Magistrates

17,059

Hampshire and Isle of Wight—South West Hampshire Magistrates

33,025

Hampshire and Isle of Wight—South and South East Hampshire Magistrates

35,065

Hampshire and Isle of Wight—Isle of Wight (IOW) Magistrates

7,750

Gwent Magistrates

33,176

North Wales Magistrates—Central Finance Office, Denbigh

34,330

South Wales Area 1—Central Finance Unit Unisys

65,349

Dyfed Powys Magistrates

24,629

High Peak

4,304

North East Derbyshire and Dales Magistrates

15,812

Southern Derbyshire Magistrates

33,969

Leicester Magistrates

26,165

Loughborough Magistrates

28,239

Lincolnshire Magistrates

24,162

Northamptonshire Magistrates

32,771

Mansfield (Rosemary St.) Magistrates

9,110

Newark Magistrates

4,431

Nottingham Magistrates

44,782

Worksop Magistrates

7,432

Staffordshire Magistrates

67,958

Walsall Magistrates

17,582

Sandwell Magistrates

10,191

Wolverhampton Magistrates Court

18,932

Dudley and Halesowen Magistrates

17,329

Warwickshire Magistrates

20,059

West Mercia Magistrates

37,309

Birmingham (VLC) Magistrates—(Corporation St.)

77,568

Coventry Magistrates

18,697

Solihull Magistrates

10,472

Sutton Coldfield Magistrates

1,120

Cumbria Magistrates—Central Payments Unit

24,066

Bolton Magistrates

19,831

Bury Magistrates

11,006

Manchester Magistrates

66,085

Oldham Magistrates

18,837

Rochdale Magistrates

20,926

Salford Magistrates

9,870

Stockport Magistrates

22,185

Tameside Magistrates

334

Trafford Magistrates

17,966

Wigan and Leigh Magistrates

20,180

East Lancashire Magistrates—Blackburn

19,838

Fylde Coast Magistrates—Blackpool

24,617

Pennine Magistrates—Burnley

20,514

South West Lancashire Magistrates—Chorley

8,847

Preston and Lancaster Magistrates

16,978

Knowsley Magistrates

11,472

Liverpool Magistrates

62,608

St. Helens Magistrates

9,786

Cheshire Accounting Division1

34,811

Cleveland Magistrates

44,277

Durham Magistrates

41,219

Humber—East Yorkshire Magistrates—Beverley

34,182

Humber—North Lincolnshire Magistrates—Scunthorpe and Grimsby Central Finance Unit

12,564

Humber—North Lincolnshire Magistrates—Scunthorpe and Grimsby Central Finance Unit

9,064

North Yorkshire Magistrates

18,762

Northumbria Magistrates

106,822

South Yorkshire Magistrates

104,221

West Yorkshire Magistrates

145,498

Total England and Wales

3,121,089

1 Was North, South and West pre 1 July 2009

Source:

Intranet Fees Accounting System

Crimes Against Humanity: Jurisdiction

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice whether he has any plans to introduce legislation to restrict the universal jurisdiction of UK courts for crimes against humanity; and if he will make a statement. (309027)

The offence of crimes against humanity is found in the International Criminal Court Act 2001. It covers crimes committed in England and Wales and Northern Ireland by any person and crimes committed outside the UK by UK nationals, persons subject to UK service jurisdiction and UK residents (including persons who subsequently become resident in the UK).

The Government have no plans to restrict this jurisdiction of the UK courts for crimes against humanity.

Debt Collection

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice in what circumstances bailiffs can be used to collect unpaid credit card debts. (308812)

Credit card judgment debts are treated as any other civil judgment debt for the purposes of enforcement, subject to any challenges the debtor makes in respect of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (as amended by Consumer Credit Act 2006). However consumer credit debts remain in the county court for execution and they cannot be transferred up to the High Court for enforcement by a High Court enforcement officer as a normal county court judgment can.

Departmental Billing

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many and what proportion of invoices submitted to his Department have been paid within 10 days in each month since October 2008; and if he will make a statement. (307958)

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is fully committed to achieving compliance with the Prime Minister's target of paying suppliers within 10 days, and is a signatory to the Prompt Payment Code. The MoJ has been collecting prompt payment data since November 2008 and the number and proportion of invoices paid within 10 days is shown in the following table.

Period name

Total MoJ invoices paid in month

MoJ prompt invoices as percentage

Number of invoices paid in 10 days

2008

November

98,917

64

63,307

December

99,565

59

58,743

2009

January

104,870

55

57,679

February

101,035

67

67,693

March

124,418

66

82,116

April

79,783

82

65,422

May

66,807

92

61,462

June

83,154

88

73,541

July

81,379

89

72,427

August

71,723

88

63,116

September

93,244

92

85,784

October

99,820

92

91,834

November

99,248

93

92,301

Departmental Conferences

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice which conferences held overseas have been attended by civil servants based in his Department in the last three years; and what the cost to the public purse was of such attendance at each conference. (305870)

This information is not held centrally and could be provided only by manually collecting the data from each division within the Ministry of Justice at a disproportionate cost. Expenditure on conferences must be incurred in accordance with the principles of the Treasury publications Managing Public Money and Regularity, Propriety and Value for Money.

Departmental Legislation

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what criminal offences have been (a) created and (b) abolished by secondary legislation sponsored by his Department since 1 May 2008. (307797)

The Ministry of Justice has been responsible for 237 statutory instruments since May 2008. The number of offences which these created and abolished can be established only at disproportionate cost since a manual trawl of the legislation would be required.

Driving Offences: Disqualification

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what recent discussions he has had with the Magistrates’ Association on sentencing policy for people convicted of driving whilst disqualified. (308213)

The Chairman of the Road Traffic Committee of the Magistrates’ Association corresponded in 2009 with Ministers on the subject of sentencing for the offence of driving while disqualified.

Drugs: East Sussex

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many (a) trials and (b) convictions there were for drug offences in East Sussex between 2000 and 2009. (308460)

The number of defendants proceeded against at magistrates courts and found guilty at all courts in the Sussex police force area for drug offences, from 2000 to 2007 (latest available) can be viewed in the following table.

Information held centrally cannot be broken down sufficiently to supply data for East Sussex, therefore Sussex police force area data have been provided in lieu.

Data for 2008 are planned for publication on 28 January 2010.

Number of defendants proceeded against at magistrates courts and found guilty at all courts for drug offences, Sussex police force area 2000 to 20071, 2

Proceeded against

Found guilty

2000

1,009

818

2001

1,306

1,081

2002

1,383

1,179

2003

1,164

1,075

2004

974

861

2005

1,162

1,026

2006

1,166

1,013

2007

1,317

1,141

1 The statistics relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences the principal offence is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.

2 Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.

Source:

Justice Statistics Analytical Services—Ministry of Justice.

Insider Trading: Convictions

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many people were convicted for offences related to insider dealing in each year since 2005; and if he will make a statement. (308376)

The number of persons found guilty at all courts in England and Wales for offences under the Criminal Justice Act 1993 and the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 from 2005 to 2007 (latest available) can be viewed in the following table.

Data for 2008 are planned for publication on 28 January 2010.

The number of defendants found guilty at all courts for offences relating to insider dealing, England and Wales 2005 to 20071,2

Offence description

Statute

2005

2006

2007

Insider dealing

Criminal Justice Act 1993, Sec 52

4

2

6

Disclosure, obstruction making false or misleading statements etc

Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, Secs 346, 351, 352, 397 and 398; Sch 4

1

2

3

1 The statistics relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. W hen a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences the principal offence is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.

2 Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.

Source:

Justice Statistics Analytical Services—Ministry of Justice

Iraq Committee of Inquiry

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many (a) documents and (b) other items of information held in electronic format by his Department of each security classification have been submitted to the Iraq Inquiry; and if he will make a statement. (309371)

I refer the hon. Lady to the reply given by my right hon. Friend the Minister of State for the Cabinet Office (Angela E. Smith) on 14 December 2009, Official Report, columns 840-41W. The Ministry of Justice is in the process of providing the Iraq Inquiry with all the documents and electronic information it holds which has been requested to date. This information spans every level of Government security classification.

Jamie Douglas

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice when the Parole Board expects to consider the application for parole of Jamie Douglas. (308229)

Legal Advice and Assistance

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice for what reasons the Legal Services Commission has chosen the period between April and August 2009 to assess the annual run-rate of new matter start allocations for providers of the Advice and Assistance Scheme (Legal Help). (308468)

The Legal Services Commission chose the period April 2009 to August 2009 as this was the most up to date information available from legal aid providers when a review was undertaken in September 2009.

Legal Aid: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) how many responses he received to the consultation paper 18/09 on legal aid funding reforms; (308962)

(2) if he will publish the responses to the consultation paper 18/09 on legal aid funding reforms; and when he plans to announce his decisions on policy changes to be made in the light of the consultation responses.

I refer the hon. Member to my written ministerial statement of 16 December 2009, Official Report, column 141WS, in which my noble Friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Lord Bach) announced the publication of a partial response to the consultation on Legal Aid Funding Reforms.

A total of 435 responses were received. There are no plans to publish the responses to the consultation. A copy of the consultation response and accompanying impact assessment has been placed in the House Library. A response to the proposals in relation to experts fees will be published in the new year. The documents are also available on the consultation section of the Ministry of Justice website at:

www.justice.gsi.gov.uk

Mentally Disturbed Offenders

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many offenders imprisoned under indeterminate sentence for public protection are in secure hospitals; and if he will make a statement. (307866)

Prisoners may be detained in hospital under powers of the Mental Health Act 1983, either if directed to hospital by the court on sentencing or if directed by the Secretary of State during their sentence. They may also be remitted to prison during sentence. On 17 December 2009, Ministry of Justice records showed 113 prisoners in hospital under powers of the 1983 Act, who were also serving indeterminate sentences of imprisonment for public protection.

Prison Accommodation

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many cells in the prison estate are not counted for the purposes of operational capacity; and for what reason each such cell is not counted. (307424)

Directors of offender management must ensure that each cell used for the confinement of prisoners has sufficient heating, lighting and ventilation and is of adequate size for the number or prisoners it is approved for. Each such cell is recorded on a prison’s cell certificate.

Not all accommodation recorded on a prison’s cell certificate is part of its certified normal accommodation and in the vast majority of cases will also not form part of its operational capacity. This is due to a range of operational reasons, which include those cells that are part of segregation units (where prisoners should only be held under a governor’s express authority), cells in in-patient health care centres (which are only suitable for prisoners with relevant health needs) and holding cells in prison receptions (which are not suitable for holding prisoners overnight).

As of 14 December 2009, based on information from central records, about 2,712 places were not included in the certified normal accommodation (or uncrowded capacity) of the prison estate. This equates to an average of 19 cells per prison.

These figures have been drawn from central administrative/recording systems, which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.

Prisoners Release

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice if he will assess the merits of increasing the period of time a person with a terminal illness can be released early from prison on compassionate grounds. (308552)

Early release on compassionate grounds should only be permitted in the most exceptional circumstances and where the risk of reoffending is past. It is right, therefore, to apply stringent criteria. Prisoners with a terminal illness can receive the appropriate care and treatment while in custody and we believe that early release from their sentence should only be considered in the final stages or where they become too ill to remain in prison. The criteria applied in medical circumstances state:

“the prisoner is suffering from a terminal illness and death is likely to occur soon; or the prisoner is bedridden or similarly incapacitated”.

The three-month period is suggested as a guide for the sort of life expectancy that should be taken into consideration when applying the criteria but is just one of a number of factors that are taken into account.

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many (a) offenders and (b) offenders on temporary licence were released from HM Prison Service into the Probation Service, in each year since 2004. (309218)

Adult offenders serving a sentence of 12 months or more and all young offenders under 22 years of age are, upon release, subject to supervision by the probation services.

These figures are published annually in Offender Management Caseload Statistics (OMCS). Copies are in the House of Commons Libraries and on the MOJ website at:

http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/prisonandprobation.htm

The following table shows the number of discharges from determinate sentences from prisons in England and Wales. The figures are the sum of adult prisoners released from sentences of 12 months or more (including indeterminate sentences) and all young offender releases.

Prisoners released

2004

42,000

2005

42,000

2006

40,400

2007

42,700

2008

45,600

Data for 2009 will be available in the OMCS 2009 which will be published in July 2010.

Prisoners released on temporary licence remain the responsibility of the prison during the period of temporary release. However, where prisoners are liable to supervision on their normal release date but are released early under the End of Custody Licence scheme, they are required to meet their probation officer during the ECL licence period and to have regular contact after that in line with their supervision programme.

The number of ECL releases for those prisoners serving sentences of 12 months or more and less than four years for the year 2007 and 2008 was 2,941 and 5,643. Data for 2007 are based on the period from 29 June, when the scheme started, to 31 December.

All figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.

Prisoners: Body Searches

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what his Department's policy is on the strip-searching of females under the age of 18 years in prison. (307867)

In February 2009 the National Offender Management Service introduced new full search arrangements aimed at reducing the frequency of full searches by a more intelligence-led approach for all females detained within prisons in England. The new arrangements do not require the removal of underwear unless there is intelligence or suspicion at any stage that an item is concealed. The arrangements are kept under constant review, and a full assessment completed in August achieved a positive outcome. A further detailed assessment will be conducted early in spring 2010.

Prisoners: Location

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice at what average distance from home (a) young adult prisoners, (b) adult prisoners and (c) children prisoners were held in each year since 1997, broken down by sex. (308071)

Table A shows the average travelling distance from home in miles of remand and sentenced prisoners held in HMPs accommodation by gender. Data prior to 2006 are not available in the format requested.

All prisoners are asked for details of their home address on first reception to prison and on discharge from prison. Approximately 60 per cent. of prisoners (both male and female) are shown to have given a recognised address.

If no address is given, various proxies are used to determine distance from home, including next-of-kin address and committal court address.

Table A

Adult (21+)

Young offender (18 to 20)

Juvenile (15 to 17)

Month

Male

Female

Male

Female

Male

Female

September 2006

49

58

48

57

56

63

September 2007

50

59

49

50

55

71

September 08

50

57

50

53

52

55

May 2009

50

55

49

51

51

55

Table B shows the average distance from home in miles for remand and sentenced young people in .secure children’s homes and secure training centres from 2001 to 2009 by gender. Data prior to 2001 are not available in the format requested.

Home area is taken as a young person’s address at the time of sentence. If no address is recorded, the address of the Youth Offending Team that the young person is attached to is used as a proxy.

Table B

Male

Female

2001

59

75

2002

59

61

2003

56

61

2004

56

69

2005

52

63

2006

48

61

2007

54

68

2008

52

59

2009

47

52

Prisoners: Mothers

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many mother and baby units exist for female prisoners in England and Wales; and what the capacity for female prisoners and their children is of each. (309016)

There are seven mother and baby units (MBUs) in England providing an overall capacity of 75 places. Each unit can normally accommodate one set of twins. However, the number of places available at any one time can fluctuate for operational reasons, and currently stands at 69. The following table lists each prison with an MBU and the current capacity.

Establishment

MBU capacity

Askham Grange

10

Bronzefield

12

Eastwood Park

12

Holloway

13

New Hall

3

Peterborough

12

Styal

7

Total

69

Prisoners: Voting Rights

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) who the respondents were to the second round of consultation on voting rights for prisoners; (308289)

(2) how many respondents to the second round of consultation on voting rights for prisoners were convicted prisoners.

The second stage consultation on the voting rights of convicted prisoners closed on 29 September. A detailed analysis of the replies to the second stage consultation—including a breakdown of respondents—will be available upon publication of the Government's response. There have been over 100 responses to the consultation from a number of different groups including charities, local authorities, members of the public and prisoners, which we are currently considering carefully.

Prisons: Overcrowding

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many prisoners in each prison in England and Wales were held in overcrowded accommodation in the most recent period for which figures are available. (307869)

The average number of prisoners in overcrowded accommodation in each prison for the period April to October 2009 is provided in the following table.

Establishment name

Average number of prisoners held in overcrowded conditions: April to October 2009

Acklington

0

Albany

0

Altcourse

891

Ashfield

0

Ashwell

27

Askham Grange

0

Aylesbury

0

Bedford

293

Belmarsh

372

Birmingham

640

Blantyre House

0

Blundeston

127

Brinsford

35

Bristol

162

Brixton

228

Bronzefield

0

Buckley Hall

67

Bullingdon

423

Bullwood Hall

17

Bure

0

Camp Hill

148

Canterbury

211

Cardiff

530

Castington

2

Channings Wood

32

Chelmsford

233

Coldingley

24

Cookham Wood

0

Dartmoor

46

Deerbolt

0

Doncaster

761

Dorchester

166

Dovegate

95

Dover

0

Downview

0

Drake Hall

0

Durham

708

East Sutton Park

0

Eastwood Park

46

Edmunds Hill

0

Elmley

403

Erlestoke

0

Everthorpe

151

Exeter

409

Featherstone

23

Feltham

0

Ford

0

Forest Bank

666

Foston Hall

0

Frankland

0

Full Sutton

0

Garth

32

Gartree

0

Glen Parva

413

Gloucester

145

Grendon

0

Guys Marsh

86

Haslar

0

Haverigg

25

Hewell

377

High Down

234

Highpoint

43

Hindley

0

Hollesley Bay

0

Holloway

0

Holme House

263

Hull

578

Huntercombe

0

Kennet

321

Kingston

0

Kirkham

0

Kirklevington

0

Lancaster

155

Lancaster Farms

83

Latchmere House

0

Leeds

608

Leicester

305

Lewes

136

Leyhill

0

Lincoln

469

Lindholme

79

Littlehey

123

Liverpool

349

Long Lartin

0

Low Newton

50

Lowdham Grange

89

Maidstone

55

Manchester

651

Moorland

77

Morton Hall

0

Mount

31

New Hall

55

North Sea Camp

2

Northallerton

165

Norwich

193

Nottingham

335

Onley

0

Parc

315

Parkhurst

35

Pentonville

533

Peterborough

216

Portland

0

Preston

638

Ranby

236

Reading

123

Risley

65

Rochester

0

Rye Hill

0

Send

0

Shepton Mallet

47

Shrewsbury

226

Stafford

0

Standford Hill

0

Stocken

69

Stoke Heath

133

Styal

20

Sudbury

0

Swaleside

95

Swansea

323

Swinfen Hall

26

Thorn Cross

0

Usk\Prescoed

241

Verne

62

Wakefield

0

Wandsworth

1,095

Warren Hill

0

Wayland

91

Wealstun

38

Wellingborough

2

Werrington

0

Wetherby

0

Whatton

67

Whitemoor

0

Winchester

420

Wolds

101

Woodhill

353

Wormwood Scrubs

124

Wymott

104

Probation Service: Disabled

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) how many staff of the Probation Service in England and Wales who have been diagnosed with a disability have been dismissed under the sickness attendance procedure since 1 April 2008; (308124)

(2) how many staff of the Probation Service in England and Wales who have been diagnosed with a disability are currently subject to stage (a) 1, (b) 2 and (c) 3 of the formal sickness attendance process.

Information about the reasons for dismissal or about individuals subject to the various stages of the formal sickness attendance process is not collated centrally as this is a local probation area management issue.

It is not possible to obtain the required information without incurring disproportionate costs as it would entail each of the 42 probation boards/trusts to collate and compile the information. This would then have to be submitted to the centre for further collation and presentation.

Radicalism: Crime Prevention

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) how many officials of his Department have responsibility to tackle extremism by developing interventions and programmes for extremist offenders; (308125)

(2) how many units within his Department have responsibility to tackle extremism by developing interventions and programmes for extremist offenders.

There are two units within the National Offender Management Service developing interventions and programmes for extremist offenders who work closely together:

National Offender Management Service (NOMS) Interventions and Substance Misuse Group (ISMG)

This unit, which is funded by the Home Office, is made up of four full-time and one part-time staff and is managed by a senior principal chartered forensic psychologist.

NOMS Chaplaincy HQ

The NOMS Chaplaincy HQ has set up a sub-committee (made up of eight part-time staff, and with oversight from the NOMS ISMG) for designing a faith-based intervention for tackling those offenders who may be vulnerable to extremism.

Reoffenders

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what the most recent figures are for the re-offending rate of people aged (a) under 18, (b) between 18 and 21 and (c) over 21 years old for people who have been released from prison. (308068)

Table 1 contains the one year reoffending rates for offenders aged under 18 who were discharged from custody in the first quarter of each year for which data are available.

Table 1: One year reoffending rates for offenders aged under 18 discharged from custody, 2000, 2002-07

Cohort

Number of offenders

Rate of reoffending

Number of offences per 100 offenders

2000 Q1

912

75.7

482.1

2002 Q1

959

72.9

465.9

2003 Q1

786

73.8

442.5

2004 Q1

815

76.4

414.8

2005 Q1

844

73.1

409.5

2006 Q1

817

77.0

404.0

2007 Q1

778

75.3

359.0

Table 2 contains the one year reoffending rates for adult offenders aged 18 to 21, and 22 and over, who were discharged from custody in the first quarter of each year for which data are available.

Table 2: One year reoffending rates for adults discharged from custody, 2000, 2002-07, by age of offender

Age

Cohort

Number of offenders

Rate of reoffending

Number of offences per 100 offenders

18-21

2000 Q1

3,653

63.9

333.0

2002 Q1

3,369

63.7

349.5

2003 Q1

2,985

61.9

334.9

2004 Q1

2,980

58.8

301.8

2005 Q1

2,682

56.5

266.8

2006 Q1

2,500

53.8

243.0

2007 Q1

2,285

56.2

267.7

22 and over

2000 Q1

12,064

47.6

219.1

2002 Q1

12,196

52.6

271.2

2003 Q1

11,361

51.8

264.4

2004 Q1

12,769

50.3

241.7

2005 Q1

11,897

47.4

219.9

2006 Q1

11,864

44.9

201.1

2007 Q1

10,525

45.3

213.5

Note:

Reoffending data are not available for 2001 due to a problem with archived data on court orders. Since it will not substantially increase the knowledge on the current progress on reoffending, no resources have been allocated to fix this problem.

More information on the reoffending rates is available from the Ministry of Justice website.

Adult reoffending:

http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/reoffendingofadults.htm

Juvenile reoffending:

http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/reoffendingjuveniles.htm

Sentencing: Greater London

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) how many people received a (a) simple caution, (b) conditional caution, (c) cannabis warning and (d) penalty notice for disorder following a court appearance in each London local authority in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement; (309297)

(2) how many young people received a (a) reprimand, (b) final warning and (c) penalty notice for disorder following a court appearance in each London local authority in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement.

Cautions, cannabis warnings, reprimands, warnings, and penalty notices for disorder are out of court disposals issued by the police, authorised persons and the Crown Prosecution Service to deal proportionately with less serious offences which do not merit prosecution at court. Data reported centrally on the number of cautions, cannabis warnings, reprimands, warnings or penalty notices for disorder issued do not identify if an offender has previously appeared in court.

The number of persons receiving a caution, reprimand or warning, or given a penalty notice for disorder, in Greater London, by age group, from 2003 to 2007 (latest available) is given in table 1 as follows. Currently, data on simple or conditional cautions are not published separately although the Crown Prosecution Service is planning to publish conditional cautioning data on a monthly basis from February 2010.

Cautions and court proceedings data are not available at local authority level therefore information is given in the table for Greater London (includes the Metropolitan and the City of London police force areas).

Cautions, penalty notices for disorder, and court proceedings data for 2008 are planned for publication on 28 January 2010.

Since 2004 the police may issue an adult offender with a cannabis warning for simple possession of cannabis (prior to 2006 referred to as a “street warning”), in accordance with guidance issued by the Association of Chief Police Officers for England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Home Office Statisticians advise that an offence can be shown as detected once the police have issued a cannabis warning. The data collected centrally relate to the number of offences of cannabis possession detected by means of a cannabis warning and may not be the same as the number of cannabis warnings issued to offenders. Information on the number of cannabis warnings recorded by the police as method of detection for possession of cannabis offences for the London region from 2004-05 to 2008-09 can be viewed in table 2 as follows.

Table 1: The number of offenders issued with a caution, reprimand, warning and penalty notice for disorder in London2, by age group, 2003 to 20073,4,5

Cautioned

Penalty notice for disorder (PNDs)6

Total cautioned7

Aged 10 to 17 reprimand

Aged 10 to 17 warning

Aged 18 or over cautioned

Total PNDs

Aged 16 and 17

Aged 18 and over

2003

32,297

6,248

3,313

22,736

1

1

1

2004

32,433

6,851

4,128

21,454

12,818

342

12,476

2005

35,959

7,180

3,880

24,899

18,266

888

17,378

2006

44,694

8,577

4,282

31,835

21,172

1,192

19,980

2007

49,706

8,587

4,600

36,519

25,070

1,306

23,764

1 Not applicable.

2 Includes Metropolitan police force area and City of London police force area.

3 From 1 June 2000 the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 came into force nationally and removed the use of cautions for persons under 18 and replaced them with reprimands and warnings.

4 The cautions, reprimand and warning statistics relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When an offender has been cautioned, reprimanded or received a warning for two or more offences at the same time the principal offence is the more serious offence.

5 Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.

6 The Penalty Notice for Disorder Scheme was implemented in all 43 police forces in England and Wales in 2004 under the provisions of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001.

7 Includes Reprimands and Warnings.

Source:

Justice Statistics Analytical Services.

Table 2: The number of cannabis warnings recorded by the police as method of detection for possession of cannabis offences, for the London Region1, 2004-05 to 2008-09

Police force area

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-092

London region

13,665

21,722

30,927

47,415

47,710

1 Comprises City of London Police and Metropolitan Police.

2 Since 26 January 2009, Penalty Notices for Disorder (PNDs) can be given for cannabis possession. Up to the end of March 2009 such PNDs were counted together with cannabis warnings.

Source:

Home Office Statistics.

Victim Support Schemes: Lancashire

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how much Government funding has been allocated to victim support in the Lancashire Constabulary area in each year since 1996. (308583)

Prior to 2001 records of specific allocation of how Victim Support decided to allocate Government funding, broken down into areas is not available. The following table gives the detail of the allocation of Government funding to Lancashire from 2001 to date.

Total Government funding to victim support (£ million)

Funding allocated to Lancashire

1996-97

11.68

n/a

1997-98

12.68

n/a

1998-99

12.68

n/a

1999-2000

17.5

n/a

2000-01

18.6

n/a

2001-02

25.1

724,010

2002-03

29.3

580,325

2003-04

30

685,263

2004-05

30

640,119

2005-06

30

671,248

2006-07

30

667,785

2007-08

35.8

707,646

2008-09

37

794,296

n/a = Not available.

Young Offender Institutions

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many people there are in (a) the Josephine Butler Unit at Downview Young Offender Institution (YOI), (b) the Mary Carpenter Unit at Eastwood Park YOI, (c) the Rivendell Unit at New Hall YOI and (d) the Toscana Unit at Foston Hall YOI; and how much it cost to keep a person in each of those units in the latest period for which figures are available. (308026)

The following table sets out the number of young women (aged 17) held in young offender institutions on 30 October 2009, and the average annual cost per place at each.

The data have been supplied by the Youth Justice Board and have been drawn from administrative IT systems, which, as with any large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing and may be subject to change over time.

Establishment

Number of young women held

Annual cost per place 2009-10 (£000)

Josephine Butler Unit, Downview YOI

15

125

Mary Carpenter Unit, Eastwood Park YOI

15

133

Rivendell Unit, New Hall YOI

18

136

Toscana Unit, Foston Hall YOI

15

102

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many and what proportion of young offenders’ institutions have (a) a resettlement officer and (b) a social worker. (308028)

Each young offender institution (YOI) has an offender management team that which oversees resettlement issues and fulfils the establishment’s obligations in this regard. The size and composition of the team will depend on a number of factors including the role of the YOI and the size of the population.

There are currently 22.5 social worker posts in YOIs and dedicated units for young women in England and Wales. Eleven and a half of these posts are vacant.

Young Offenders: Females

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many females under 18 years were in custody (a) on remand and (b) after sentence in each month in each of the last three years. (308237)

The following table gives the numbers of females aged under 18 years in custody in all prison establishments (a) on remand and (b) under sentence in England and Wales in each month between June 2006 and June 2009:

On remand

Under sentence

Total

2009

June

12

42

54

May

15

44

59

April

10

37

47

March

13

34

47

February

12

34

46

January

15

36

51

2008

December

15

40

55

November

18

50

68

October

13

59

72

September

17

56

73

August

16

48

64

July

17

53

70

June

14

57

71

May

13

56

69

April

17

50

67

March

14

44

58

February

22

43

65

January

20

43

63

2007

December

15

45

60

November

20

44

64

October

19

50

69

September

15

53

68

August

21

58

79

July

18

60

78

June

19

56

75

May

23

58

81

April

18

43

61

March

17

55

72

February

21

50

71

January

24

42

66

2006

December

16

42

58

November

16

50

66

October

19

49

68

September

21

49

70

August

29

48

77

July

21

46

67

June

19

50

69

This information is available from the Ministry of Justice monthly briefing at the following website:

http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/populationincustody.htm

The following table shows numbers of females aged under 18 years in custody at the end of each month since October 2006 in Secure Children's Homes and Secure Training Centres in England and Wales.

On Remand

Under sentence

Total

2009

October

12

83

95

September

11

79

90

August

13

100

113

July

16

96

112

June

12

99

111

May

16

86

102

April

16

95

111

March

20

96

116

February

14

94

108

January

18

102

120

2008

December

15

86

101

November

20

110

130

October

14

112

126

September

11

98

109

August

19

109

128

July

22

113

135

June

14

131

145

May

22

113

135

April

35

101

136

March

24

108

132

February

23

104

127

January

20

99

119

2007

December

17

126

143

November

19

133

152

October

19

135

154

September

16

144

160

August

16

149

165

July

23

138

161

June

15

128

143

May

18

108

126

April

16

112

128

March

17

121

138

February

26

111

137

January

18

111

129

2006

December

14

115

129

November

19

114

133

October

13

105

118

These figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.

Young Offenders: Rehabilitation

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what detoxification facilities are available in (a) the Josephine Butler Unit at Downview Young Offender Institution (YOI), (b) the Mary Carpenter Unit at Eastwood Park YOI, (c) the Rivendell Unit at New Hall YOI, (d) the Toscanna Unit at Foston Hall YOI, (e) Hassockfield Secure Training Centre (STC), (f) Oakhill STC, (g) Medway STC and (h) Rainsbrook STC. (308069)

The Young People’s Substance Misuse Service delivers services in all under-18 young offender institutions including the four special units for 17-year-old girls. All young people entering a young offender institution are assessed for substance misuse needs and an appropriate care pathway is developed, specific to the young person’s individual needs. Staff at all establishments are able to access NHS facilities or provide appropriate medical treatment.

The health care service provided to young people in secure training centres includes the assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of physical and mental disorders, including addiction to drugs, alcohol, smoking and other intoxicating substances. All young people entering an STC are assessed by health care staff and have access to NHS facilities and specialists when clinically required.

Young Offenders: Reoffenders

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what percentage of (a) 12, (b) 13, (c) 14, (d) 15, (e) 16, (f) 17, (g) 18 and (h) 19 year-olds who were released from each young offenders institution in each of the last five years re-offended (i) within the first month, (ii) between one and six months, (iii) between six and 12 months and (iv) between 12 and 24 months after release. (308236)

Reoffending data are based on offences committed within one year of an offenders’ release from custody. Reoffending data covering longer time periods are not collated and therefore the proportion of offenders that reoffended between 12 and 24 months after release are not available.

Juvenile reoffending covers offenders aged 17 and under. A release from custody could be from a secure training centre, a secure children’s home or a young offender institution. Data are not broken down by type of release establishment or by individual release establishment.

Table 1 as follows shows the rate of reoffending for each of the last five years for which data are available for offenders in the specified age groups. Those aged 12 through to 15 have been banded due to the small number of offenders in each of the groups.

Table 1: Number of offenders released from custody aged 12-17, and proportion that committed a reoffence within one year, split by age and date of offence, juveniles, 2003-07

Percentage of offenders that committed a reoffence

Cohort

Age

Number of offenders

Within 1 month of release

Between 1 and 6 months of release

Between 6 and 12 months of release

Total

2003

12-15

133

9.0

46.6

22.6

78.2

16

235

20.0

44.3

12.3

76.6

17

418

15.3

44.0

11.5

70.8

2004

12-15

209

19.1

42.6

18.7

80.4

16

244

18.0

45.9

13.1

77.0

17

362

16.6

45.0

12.2

73.8

2005

12-15

193

19.7

45.6

15.5

80.8

16

275

19.6

38.2

12.4

70.2

17

374

17.4

39.6

14.7

71.7

2006

12-15

200

19.5

44.5

19.0

83.0

16

262

20.6

43.5

15.3

79.4

17

355

14.6

42.0

15.2

71.8

2007

12-15

171

19.3

43.9

15.8

78.9

16

246

17.5

44.7

15.0

77.2

17

361

17.5

40.7

14.1

72.3

Offenders that are aged 18 and 19 are included in the adult dataset. We do not have the facility to determine which offenders were released from young offender institutions. However, all 18 and 19 year old offenders are held under young offender institution conditions, even if they are held in an adult prison. Table 2 shows the reoffending rates for all offenders aged 18 and 19 who were released from custody for the last five years for which data are available.

Table 2: Number of offenders released from custody aged 18-19, and proportion that committed a reoffence within one year, split by age and date of offence, adults, 2003-2007

Percentage of offenders that committed a reoffence

Cohort

Age

Number of offenders

Within 1 month of release

Between 1 and 6 months of release

Between 6 and 12 months of release

Total

2003 Q1

18

572

15.6

33.9

12.9

62.4

19

728

14.3

35.7

12.4

62.4

2004 Q1

18

559

15.4

36.5

11.4

63.3

19

783

15.3

32.1

10.7

58.1

2005 Q1

18

551

16.5

37.7

14.2

68.4

19

689

12.3

32.5

12.2

57.0

2006 Q1

18

477

14.9

31.0

13.0

58.9

19

644

14.3

31.4

11.5

57.1

2007 Q1

18

461

20.0

35.6

13.7

69.2

19

593

13.2

31.5

11.1

55.8

Please note that the definition of a reoffence differs between adults and juveniles. For adults, any offence within a year of release from custody, that is proven by court conviction within 18 months of release, is counted as a reoffence. For juveniles, an offence proven by court conviction or a caution within the same time period is counted as a reoffence. For this reasons the adult and juvenile reoffending rates are not directly comparable.

Further information on adult reoffending is available at:

http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/reoffendingofadults.htm

Further information on juvenile reoffending is available at:

http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/reoffendingjuveniles.htm

Treasury

Banks: Finance

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what loan loss rate his Department assumes in respect of the £280 billion portfolio of debts it is underwriting. (307150)

RBS will bear 100 per cent. of the first £60 billion of losses on the £282 billion of assets that it has included in the Asset Protection Scheme (APS). As set out in the details of the Asset Protection Scheme, published on 7 December 2009, this is in line with HM Treasury's current view of the most likely level of losses on the APS assets.

Child Benefit: EU Nationals

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the (a) average, (b) upper quartile and (c) lower quartile length of time was taken to obtain confirmation that family benefits were not in payment in another EEA member state for EEA national child benefit claimants in (i) 2005-06, (ii) 2006-07, (iii) 2007-08 and (iv) 2008-09. (308120)

The information requested is not available, as HM Revenue and Customs systems do not capture the time taken to obtain confirmation from other EEA member states.

Departmental Conferences

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much was spent by his Department and its agencies on conferences they organised which were subsequently cancelled in each of the last three years; and what the title was of each such conference. (308836)

The Treasury does not hold a central record of conferences and the information requested could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Departmental Pay

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many staff in his Department received bonus payments in each of the last five years for which information is available; what proportion of the total workforce they represented; what the total amount of bonuses paid was; what the largest single payment was; and if he will make a statement. (300380)

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) how many (a) year end and (b) in-year bonuses were paid to officials in his Department in each of the last three years; and how much was paid in each year; (302780)

(2) how much funding his Department has allocated for (a) year-end and (b) in-year bonuses in 2009-10.

The following table sets out the information requested on performance awards paid by HM Treasury in 2008-09. For information on prior years I refer the hon. Members to the answer given by the then Exchequer Secretary, my hon. Friend the Member for Wallasey (Angela Eagle) on 17 November 2008, Official Report, column 164W.

HM Treasury performance awards 2008-09

Expenditure incurred

Performance award (£000)

1,177

Special performance award (£000)

208

Number of staff receiving a bonus

Performance award

482

Special performance award

1492

Percentage of staff receiving a bonus2

Performance award

39

Special performance award

40

Largest single award (£000)

20

1 In addition, one award was made to a member of staff on secondment to a private sector organisation that subsequently reimbursed the Department.

2 Based on FTE headcount at 31 March 2009.

EU Emission Trading Scheme

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer with reference to the projections in Table 2.9 of the Budget 2009, how much revenue he expects to come from the receipts from future phases of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme in each year to 2013-14; and if he will make a statement. (307279)

The pre-Budget report includes the most recent estimates for EU ETS receipts, based on the likely number of allowances and the secondary market price of carbon, in the ‘other taxes and Royalties’ line in Table 2.9 of the economy and public finances-supplementary material.

The pre-Budget report (p120) also noted that, to date, UK carbon auctions had raised over £350 million and that future revenue was set to rise to around £2 billion in 2013-14.

Fiscal Policy

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what analysis his Department has undertaken of fiscal consolidation measures undertaken in other advanced economies over the last 30 years. (308675)

Treasury officials undertake analysis relative to their respective policy spheres as a matter of course. This includes reviewing available literature and evaluation of previous policy actions where appropriate.

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

British Indian Ocean Territory: Environment Protection

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will declare a no-take marine reserve in respect of the vulnerable reef systems of the Chagos Archipelago. (309413)

A decision will be taken following the public consultation which is at present under way and which will run until 12 February 2010.

British Overseas Territories

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs with reference to the answer of 9 October 2009, Official Report, column 1241W, on “British Overseas Territories: Prisoners”, what plans there are to increase prison capacity in each of the UK Overseas Territories in the Caribbean in which prisoner population exceeds capacity. (309361)

The information is as follows.

Anguilla: The prison service has submitted a bid to the Government of Anguilla for financial support to enable the prison to purchase modular “ready to use” prison cells. In addition, concurrent plans are in hand to assess the feasibility of converting the prison’s administration block into cellular accommodation. It is also expected that the Parole and Probation Bills will be passed in 2010, thereby diverting from prison a number of offenders and reducing overall prisoner numbers.

British Virgin Islands: A feasibility study is underway to assess the practicality of converting an existing prison workshop and storage area into cellular accommodation for lower risk prisoners. In addition, the establishment of the Parole Board in early 2010 will see a number of early releases on parole, thereby reducing prisoner numbers.

Cayman Islands: There is a process of building work within the site of HMP Northward which will add capacity during 2010. In addition, the Cayman Islands Government are assessing the potential of an “early release” scheme for suitable offenders and have set up a working group to look at the feasibility of a National Strategic Rehabilitation Board.

Turks and Caicos Islands: A new wing of the prison is now complete and the necessary security fencing is due to be finished by the end of January 2010. Although this wing is for the few female prisoners, the opening of this wing will free-up capacity elsewhere in the prison. In addition, the imminent completion of a new prison kitchen will enable the existing kitchen area to be converted into accommodation for low risk prisoners early in 2010.

Broadband

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs with reference to the answer of 14 October 2009, what proportion of households in (a) the Falkland Islands, (b) St. Helena and (c) Tristan da Cunha have access to broadband internet. (309274)

Responsibility for telecommunications in the Falkland Islands, St. Helena and Tristan da Cunha rests with the Governments of the Falkland Islands, St. Helena and Tristan da Cunha, who hold the required information.

Cayman Islands

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs with reference to the answer of 26 October 2009, Official Report, columns 66-67W, on “British Overseas Territories: Police”, how many of the officers arrested for criminal activity in the Cayman Islands were convicted. (309224)

The Royal Cayman Islands Police Service has clarified that, of the 13 officers arrested in the last five years, six were arrested for criminal offences and the others were arrested for non-criminal offences. Of the six arrested for criminal offences, three have been convicted, two await trial and one has been acquitted.

Croatia: EC Enlargement

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent progress has been made on accession negotiations between the EU and Croatia; and if he will make a statement. (308360)

On 21 December 2009 the EU and Croatia provisionally closed a further two chapters of the accession negotiations, bringing the total provisionally closed to 17 out of 35. A further 11 chapters are open and under negotiation.

The European Commission published its annual report on enlargement on 14 October 2009 which assessed that Croatia’s preparations had advanced substantially across the board in 2009, that technical negotiations are now nearing their final phase, and that if Croatia meets all outstanding benchmarks in time it could be possible to conclude negotiations in 2010. But Croatia has much to do if it is to meet this time scale. Reform efforts need to be stepped up in the areas of judiciary and fundamental rights, in particular as regards the independence and efficiency of the judiciary, the fight against corruption and organised crime, minority rights, including refugee returns, and war crimes trials. Public administration reform also requires particular attention. Croatia also needs to take all necessary steps to settle the issue of access for the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) to important documents.

The General Affairs Council on 7 and 8 December 2009 took stock of progress, commended Croatia for good overall progress, underlined the importance of meeting all benchmarks, called for the completion of a credible investigation into military documents requested by the Prosecutor of ICTY and welcomed the establishment of a working group for drafting an Accession treaty.

Departmental Air Travel

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what his Department's policy is on the accumulation and use of air miles by his Department's personnel flying at public expense. (308484)

I refer the hon. Member to the reply given by my right hon. Friend the Member for Derby, South (Margaret Beckett), the then Secretary of State, to the hon. Member for Upper Bann (David Simpson) on 17 May 2006, Official Report, column 995W.

Departmental Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether officials posted to UK embassies overseas who are not officials of his Department operate under the authority of the British Ambassador in that country; and if he will make a statement. (307050)

Staff of other Government Departments work under the authority of the Head of Post of the Mission in which they serve. They work to the objectives of their own Departments but the Head of Post has the right to issue instructions on any matter affecting the overall work and safety of the Mission and the Government's interest in the country concerned, and to take decisions on issues such as waiver of immunity or removal of a member of staff from post.

Departmental Pay

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how much press officers in his Department claimed in reimbursable expenses in each of the last three financial years. (303768)

For the amounts claimed in reimbursable expenses by press officers at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) in London in financial years 2006-07 and 2007-08, I refer the hon. Member to the reply by my hon. Friend the Member for Sheffield, Heeley (Meg Munn) on 15 September 2008, Official Report, column 2179W.

The amount of reimbursable expenses that press officers at the FCO claimed from the press office budget in London in the financial year 2008/09 totalled £2,074.

Departmental Written Questions

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many and what percentage of Parliamentary Questions tabled for written answer by his Department on a named day in session 2008-09 received a substantive answer on that day. (307542)

In recent months, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office has significantly improved its performance in answering named day PQs on time. The numbers of such PQs received and answered on time from January 2009 to Prorogation in November 2009 were as follows. Reliable statistics are not available for December 2008.

Questions

Received

Answered

January

66

10

February

62

17

March

66

21

April

29

5

May

40

17

June

50

28

July

45

32

September

35

35

October

92

67

November

22

19

Central guidance on answering parliamentary questions is now available in the ‘Guide to Parliamentary Work’, at:

http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/parliamentary-clerk-guide.aspx

In the response to the Procedure Committee Report on written parliamentary questions, the Government accepted the Committee’s recommendation that Departments be required to provide the Procedure Committee with sessional statistics in a standard format on the time taken to respond to written parliamentary questions, accompanied by an explanatory memorandum setting out any factors affecting their performance. This will be taken forward as soon as possible.

Hotels

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many hotel room nights were booked by officials in (a) his Department and (b) its agencies in each year since 2007; and how much (i) his Department and (ii) its agencies spent on fees of third party agents in relation to booking hotel accommodation in each such year. (309320)

Booking and paying for hotel accommodation is devolved to individual Departments and posts to allow them to travel as needed to deliver the Foreign and Commonwealth Office's Strategic Objectives. All expenditure is incurred in accordance with the principles of Managing Public Money and the Treasury handbook on Regularity and Propriety. Records for accommodation and travel are grouped together and to provide a breakdown spanning the period from 2007 to present could be done only at disproportionate cost.

International Criminal Law

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what progress has been made in securing an internationally agreed definition of the crime of aggression; what the Government's proposed definition is; and if he will make a statement. (307787)

A Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression concluded its work on 13 February 2009. The report is available at:

http://www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/asp_docs/ICC-ASP-7-20-Add.1-SWGCA%20English.pdf

It includes proposals on the definition of the crime of aggression, with which the UK is generally content, as well as on the conditions for the exercise of jurisdiction over the crime. The proposals on the latter issue include a number of options. The proposals will now be considered at the Review Conference of the International Criminal Court to be held in Kampala in 2010. The Government continue to believe that any proposals must be consistent with the Charter of the UN and in particular with the primary responsibility of the Security Council for the maintenance of international peace and security.

We have no plans at present to make a further statement.

Kenya: Foreign Relations

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what aims and objectives he has set for UK foreign policy in respect of Kenya. (309147)

UK foreign policy aims to encourage and support implementation of the National Accord agreed by the Kenyan Government following the 2007-08 post-election violence, to address issues that threaten the country’s stability and prosperity. These include promoting a better constitution that reduces the “winner takes all” incentives for violence, making electoral cheating harder, and deterring political violence through reducing impunity. We will continue to support Kenyan leadership in tackling the root causes of violence, including economic inequality, tribal tension, lack of security sector reform and accountability. We will also work to combat corruption in Kenya, which is endemic with little political will to change. This is the same culture that embeds impunity, as seen in Kenya’s failure to prosecute those who perpetrated the post-election violence.

The Government work closely with the EU and other partners such as Kofi Annan to co-ordinate support and engagement against these objectives . My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary attended the EU General Affairs Council Meeting in Brussels last July where Council Conclusions on Kenya were agreed. The conclusions highlighted the need for faster implementation of key reforms vital to the interests of the Kenyan people. My noble Friend, Baroness Kinnock, the Minister for Africa, plans to visit Kenya next week, and will reinforce these messages.

National Action Plan

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what indicators with which to measure process efficiency and programme effectiveness his Department plans to include in the National Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security. (309231)

We are examining the use of indicators as part of the revision of the UK National Action Plan, which is now under way. We have started a stakeholder consultation process that includes the issue of how the UK can best measure progress against a revised plan.

Sudan

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment he has made of the new agreement between the National Congress Party and the Sudan People's Liberation Movement on the rules for the forthcoming referendum in the south of Sudan; what reports he has received on the eligibility to register and vote of (a) southerners living in the north of Sudan and (b) northerners living in the south of Sudan; and if he will make a statement. (309132)

The Minister of State, Department for International Development, my hon. Friend the Member for Harrow, West (Mr. Thomas) and my noble Friend Baroness Kinnock issued a statement on 15 December 2009 welcoming the progress made towards the forthcoming referendum in South Sudan following the agreement on 13 December 2009 at the level of the Presidency on the draft Bill.

The draft Bill reflected agreement between the parties on the eligibility to register and vote of southerners living in the north of Sudan and northerners living in the south of Sudan. We welcome the news that, despite last minute difficulties, on 29 December 2009 this Bill was agreed by consensus in the National Assembly in Sudan.

We also welcome the news that the legislation regarding the referendum for Abyei and the popular consultations for Southern Kordofan and Blue Nile States was passed by the National Assembly on 30 December 2009.

Sudan: Human Rights

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent assessment has been made of the human rights situation in South Sudan; and if he will make a statement. (308002)

As a result of tribal fighting, more people have died this year in South Sudan than in Darfur. This, and attacks by the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) displaced more than 300,000 people—more than double the number from 2008. The Government of Southern Sudan (GoSS) face several challenges which include the worsening humanitarian situation as well as security issues, corruption and the mismanagement of food stocks.

Our ambassador met with the Southern Sudan Human Rights Commission in June to assess human rights issues, including the death penalty, women's rights, access to justice and the standard of detention facilities. Our ambassador also meets regularly with the GoSS President and Ministers to discuss citizen insecurity and LRA issues. The UK also works with the UN Mission in Sudan (UNMIS) and other international partners to secure peace so that human rights can be protected in Southern Sudan.

My noble Friend Baroness Kinnock will give a further assessment of developments in Sudan during a debate in the Lords today, 7 January 2010.

Sudan: Politics and Government

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what initiatives on Sudan the Government has put forward under the recently re-established troika mechanism; and if he will make a statement. (308000)

We are in regular contact with key partners on all of the issues that face Sudan. This includes contact with both the US and Norway, who together with the UK constituted the Troika during the negotiations for the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA). Our ongoing and close contact with the US and Norway forms a part of the UK's continued engagement with key partners on the situation in Sudan.

The parties to the CPA will need to decide between themselves on the initiatives and mechanisms that will support their efforts to arrive at a peaceful conclusion to the Interim Period. International partners should be prepared to play a strongly supportive role.

My noble Friend Baroness Kinnock will give a further assessment of developments in Sudan during a debate in the Lords today, 7 January 2010.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment has been made of the implementation of the border ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration for the area of Abyei in Sudan in July 2009; and if he will make a statement. (308003)

The implementation of the Abyei ruling of the Permanent Court of Arbitration made in July 2009 is a key part of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA). We are concerned that, despite public commitment by both the National Congress Party and the Sudan People's Liberation Movement to implement the ruling, progress remains significantly behind schedule. We understand that only a small number of border markers along the 230 kilometre border have been placed. Continuing uncertainty over the border increases potential tensions and hinders implementation of other CPA milestones.

We continue to press both parties to ensure that border demarcation, as well as other commitments on Abyei, are urgently completed. A representative of our embassy in Khartoum visited Abyei in early December 2009 as part of a joint delegation with the US embassy and the Assessment and Evaluation Commission. The delegation raised our concerns directly with Government and other interlocutors.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent assessment he has made of the political situation in Sudan consequent on the North-South agreement on progress towards the forthcoming referendum; and if he will make a statement. (308064)

The Secretary of State for the Department of International Development (Mr. Thomas) and my noble Friend Baroness Kinnock released a statement on 15 December 2009 welcoming the progress made towards the forthcoming referendum following the agreement on 13 December 2009 at the level of the presidency on the draft Bill.

We welcome the news that, despite last minute difficulties, on 29 December 2009 this Bill was agreed by consensus in the National Assembly in Sudan.

We also welcome the news that the legislation regarding the referendum for Abyei and the popular consultations for Southern Kordofan and Blue Nile States was passed by the National Assembly on 30 December 2009.

We continue to urge the parties to work together at this critical point in the Comprehensive Peace Agreement to make progress on other outstanding areas and to help deliver a peaceful, equitable future for the whole of Sudan.

Tony Blair

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many (a) civil servants and (b) others are available on a (i) full-time and (ii) part-time basis to support Tony Blair in his role as Middle East peace envoy; what criteria were used to select them; by whom they were appointed; what their salary band is in each case; and if he will make a statement. (309244)

There are four members of the Office of the Quartet Representative who are directly linked to the Government.

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) provides the following full time secondees to the Office of the Quartet Representative (OQR): one higher executive officer equivalent (salary range £23,157 to £31, 495); and one senior civil servant (salary range £57,300 to £116,000). Standard FCO procedure was followed for advertising, recruiting and appointing to these posts. Mr. Blair held final interviews.

The Department for International Development (DfID) also funds a secondee to provide expert governance analysis (Grade 6 equivalent, salary range £55,814 to £66,873).

A locally engaged secondee to the OQR in Jerusalem was also funded through the Conflict Prevention Pool from October 2007 to August 2008 at a cost of £30,874. After that, this position has been funded by the UN Development Programme Trust Fund.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will itemise how the £400,000 funding allocated by his Department to the United Nations Development Trust Fund in support of Tony Blair in his role as Middle East peace envoy is broken down by (a) salaries, (b) expenses and (c) other costs in the current financial year. (309245)

The Department for International Development made a contribution to the Office of the Quartet Representative of £400,000 in financial year 2008-09. This was disbursed between security, accommodation, project management, support staff and general support (IT, office equipment, insurance, etc).

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many officials of his Department are presently seconded to support Tony Blair in his role as Middle East peace envoy; what procedure is in place for those officials to report formally to their home Department; and whether they remain subject to the Civil Service Code. (309246)

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) provides two secondees to the Office of the Quartet Representative (OQR). Officials from the OQR and FCO meet regularly. The secondees remain subject to the Civil Service Code.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs on what date (a) he and (b) other Ministers in his Department last met Tony Blair in his capacity as Middle East peace envoy. (309248)

My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary meets with Mr. Blair in his capacity as the Quartet Representative and regularly speaks to him on the telephone. Their last meeting was on 14 October 2009. Other Foreign Office Ministers have not met Mr. Blair recently in his capacity as Middle East peace envoy.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what checks are in place to ensure that monies made available to the United Nations Development Trust Fund to support the work of the Middle East peace envoy are not used for unauthorised or unconnected purposes. (309250)

The work of the Office of the Quartet Representative is set within the context of a UN Development Programme (UNDP) programme and is managed by the UNDP office based in Jerusalem according to UN procedures.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what proportion of the United Nations Development Trust Fund's budget to fund the office of the Quartet Representative was used to meet the office costs of Tony Blair in the current financial year. (309251)

This is a matter for the UN Development Programme and the Office of the Quartet Representative to answer.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what objectives Tony Blair has set in his capacity as Middle East peace envoy; and what the role of his Department was in setting those objectives. (309253)

The Quartet Representative's following aims were set out in a statement from the Quartet:

Mobilise international assistance to the Palestinians, working closely with donors and existing co-ordination bodies;

Help to identify, and secure appropriate international support in addressing, the institutional governance needs of the Palestinian state, focusing as a matter of urgency on the rule of law;

Develop plans to promote Palestinian economic development, including private sector partnerships, building on previously agreed frameworks, especially concerning access and movement; and

Liaise with other countries as appropriate in support of the agreed Quartet objectives.

While the Foreign and Commonwealth Office had no formal role in setting these aims, it has continued to be closely involved in the middle east peace process and supports these aims.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether his Department has authorised the registration of any company in connection with the work of Tony Blair has set in his role as Middle East peace envoy. (309254)

Government funding to the Office of the Quartet Representative is handled by UN Development Programme not by a company.

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office has not authorised the registration of a company in connection with the work of the Quartet Representative, which is a matter for the Office of the Quartet Representative not the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent assessment he has made of the effectiveness of Tony Blair in his role as Middle East peace envoy. (309255)

The UK supports the aims of the Quartet, which are aligned with UK interests. Mr. Blair has made a significant contribution to these aims through his work as Quartet Representative. I refer the hon. Member to my answer to parliamentary question 309256.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list the achievements of Tony Blair in his role as Middle East peace envoy. (309256)

We fully support the efforts of the Quartet Representative. He has brought important focus on efforts to create economic development.

We have seen some real progress on the ground. There has been an estimated 5 per cent. real growth in gross domestic product in 2008. This increase is due to a combination of factors especially a strong lead from the Palestinian Authority and strong donor support, but we judge that the Quartet Representative has made a valuable contribution.

The Quartet Representative has also played a strong role on a number of specific projects including the recent launch of Wataniya, the second telephony operator in the Palestinian Territories.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs on how many occasions Tony Blair has provided a written briefing to his Department pursuant to his role as Middle East peace envoy since 1 January 2009. (309257)

The Office of the Quartet Representative regularly reports to Quartet members and donors. The Quartet Representative is also in regular contact with my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary, as are his officials with our officials at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

Western Sahara: Fisheries

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether the Polisario Front was consulted on the 2006 EU-Morocco Fisheries Agreement prior to the making of that agreement. (309517)

The 2006 EU-Morocco Fisheries Agreement was negotiated by the European Commission as a bilateral agreement with the Kingdom of Morocco—the de facto administering power in Western Sahara—and there was, therefore, no requirement to consult the Polisario Front.

Business, Innovation and Skills

Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills what his Department's policy is on the negotiation of the proposed international Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. (308967)

The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement is a draft multilateral agreement which aims to provide a high-level international framework that strengthens global enforcement of intellectual property rights (IPRs). To combat the counterfeiting and piracy that threatens IPR owners, lawful businesses and the development of the world economy, ACTA concentrates on three areas; (i) better co-ordinated international co-operation, (ii) establishing best practice in enforcement methods and (iii) providing a more coherent legal framework.

The UK's policy on the negotiation of ACTA is to create an international standard to fight the growing problem of large-scale counterfeiting and piracy more efficiently, without introducing new UK intellectual property legislation.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills what recent discussions he has had on the proposed international Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement; and if he will make a statement. (308968)

I have regularly met officials of the Intellectual Property Office to keep abreast of the progress of the ACTA negotiations and to ensure that the UK position remains within the scope of existing UK legislation. I have also instructed officials to press for greater transparency in the ACTA negotiations.

Core Storage

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills what independent valuation has been made of his Department's core store site at Gilmerton; and (a) by whom and (b) when this valuation was made. (308670)

An independent valuation was carried out for the Department by the Valuation Office Agency in March 2009.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills what estimate he has made of the cost of (a) constructing and (b) operating the proposed new core storage facility in Nottinghamshire. (308672)

These are issues for the Natural Environment Research Council. The cores will be located in an extension to the existing National Geological Data Centre in Nottinghamshire. I am advised that construction of the extension and relocation of the samples will be more than offset by the capital gain on the Gilmerton store, and that operating costs will be reduced by about £200,000 year.

Departmental Conferences

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills how much was spent by his Department and its agencies on conferences they organised which were subsequently cancelled in each of the last three years; and what the title of each such conference was. (308819)

This Department does not hold this information centrally and this could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

I have approached the chief executives of the Insolvency Service, Companies House, the National Measurement Office and the Intellectual Property Office and they will respond directly to you.

Letter from Stephen Speed, dated 6 January 2010:

The Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has asked me to reply to your question how much was spent by his Department and its agencies on conferences they organised which were subsequently cancelled in each of the last three years; and what the title was of each such conference.

In the last three years, The Insolvency Service has organised one conference which it subsequently had to cancel. The conference which was entitled ‘Encouraging Company Rescue’ was due to be held in September 2009, and the costs incurred by cancelling this event were approximately £200.

Letter from Gareth Jones, dated 6 January 2010:

I am replying on behalf of Companies House to your Parliamentary Question tabled 15 December 2009, UIN 308819, to the Minister of State for Business, Innovation and Skills.

Companies House has not spent any money in the last three years on conferences which were subsequently cancelled.

Letter from Peter Mason, dated 5 January 2010:

I am responding in respect of the National Measurement Office to your Parliamentary Question tabled 15 December 2009, to the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.

The National Measurement Office has not spent anything on conferences they organized which were subsequently cancelled in the last three years.

Letter from Sean Dennehey, dated 22 December 2009:

I am responding in respect of the Intellectual Property Office to your Parliamentary Question tabled 15 December 2009, to the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.

There is a Nil Response from The Intellectual Property Office.

Departmental Procurement

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills whether there has been any nugatory cost to (a) his Department and its predecessors and (b) its agencies arising from tendered procurement in circumstances where the tender process has been cancelled prior to the award of the contract in the last five years. (303711)

The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills is unable to provide nugatory costs relating to cancelled tenders because such costs are not recorded centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

I have approached the chief executives of the Insolvency Service, Companies House, the National Measurement Office and the Intellectual Property Office and they will respond to hon. Member directly.

Letter from Stephen Speed:

The Minister of State, for the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) has asked me to reply to you directly on behalf of the Insolvency Service in respect of your question (2009/289) whether there has been any nugatory cost to (a) his Department and its predecessors and (b) its agencies arising from tendered procurement in circumstances where the tender process has been cancelled prior to the award of the contract in the last five years.

The Insolvency Service has not cancelled any tenders prior to award of contract in the last five years.

Letter from Peter Mason, dated 3 December 2009:

I am responding in respect of the National Measurement Office to your Parliamentary Question tabled on 30 November 2009, to the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.

There have been no nugatory costs to the Agency in the last five years relating to tendered procurement where the tender process has been cancelled prior to the award of the contract.

Letter from Sean Dennehey, dated 4 December 2009:

I am responding in respect of the Intellectual Property Office to your Parliamentary Question tabled 30 November 2009, to the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.

There has been no nugatory direct cost to the Intellectual Property Office arising from procurement where the tender process has been cancelled prior to the award of the contract in the last five years. However, there was in 2006/07 and 2007/08 nugatory staff effort estimated at approximately £100 each year.

Letter from Gareth Jones:

I am replying on behalf of Companies House to your Parliamentary Question tabled 30 November 2009, UIN 303711, to the Minister of State for Business, Innovation and Skills.

In the last five years Companies House has cancelled one procurement tender exercise prior to award of contract. There were no costs paid to the invited bidders as a result of the cancellation. Internal staff costs would have been incurred in the preparation of the tender process, but it is not possible to quantify them as they were not part of a formal project and therefore not recorded. However, we would not term these particular costs as being nugatory as a lot of the output generated has had continued value as reference material for future procurements.

Departmental Publicity

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills how much his Department and its predecessors have spent on (a) Ministerial photoshoots and (b) production of videos in which Ministers appear in the last three years for which figures are available. (305510)

It is not possible to provide comprehensive figures for spend on ministerial photoshoots and video productions without incurring disproportionate cost. Many videos are produced using internal resources, for use on the Department’s digital channels, such as YouTube. Others are commissioned externally as part of marketing campaigns and often not costed separately. Internal resources are also used for taking photographs at internal events.

Expenditure in the last three financial years using external photographers or video production companies which can readily be identified as ministerial photoshoots or videos including Ministers is as follows for the former Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) and the former Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (DIUS).

£

2008/09

BERR

Photography for ministerial Who’s Who board and events

1,032

Secretary of State event for all staff at BERR, October 2008

8,693.75

DIUS

Photography of Ministers

496

Filming of Ministers

8,518.25

2007/08

BERR

Photography of Ministers

450

Videos: none identified

DIUS

Photography of Ministers: none identified

Filming of Ministers

1,735

2006/07

BERR

Photography of Ministers

195.76

Filming of Ministers

7,843

Economic Situation

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills for which policies implemented as part of the Government's response to the recession his Department is responsible; when each such policy was determined; what timetable has been set for the implementation of each such policy; and what funding under each budget heading has been allocated to each such policy. (309341)

The BIS policies that were designed specifically to respond to the economic downturn are those launched as “Real Help” schemes by the predecessor Departments (BERR and DIUS), as well as targeted support for graduates and key industrial sectors. The information you have requested is summarised in the following table.

Scheme

Date agreed

Timetable for implementation and key milestones

BIS funding

Enterprise Finance Guarantee

Announced in November 2008. 12-month continuation announced in December 2009.

14 January: Scheme launched to enable up to £1.3 billion of additional bank lending to SMEs by 31 March 2010. Up to £500 million of additional lending to be enabled between 1 April 2010 and 31 March 2011.

Scheme is subject to a 13 per cent. cap on net defaults—Government liability limited to £125 million for initial lending and £50 million for additional lending.

Capital for Enterprise Fund

Announced in January 2009.

January 2009: Scheme announced. Fund registered interest while fund managers were being appointed. April 2009: fund managers appointed. End of March 2010: Fund will be closed to new investments. Fund is on course to invest its allocation in this period.

Fund is £75 million, comprising £50 million of Government funds and £25 million committed from banks. £55 million is committed to be invested in period up to the end of March 2010, with £20 million reserved for follow on funding.

Working Capital Scheme

Announced in January 2009.

January 2009: Scheme launched. March 2009: EU State Aids approval received. April 2009: First tranche of guarantees agreed with RBS and Lloyds Banking Group. July 2009: Second tranche signed with Lloyds Banking Group. Short-term existing bank lending is guaranteed up to the end of March 2011.

The scheme is designed to be cost neutral. An appropriate provision has been made to cover the possibility of unexpected losses.

Trade Credit Insurance Top-up Scheme

Announced in April 2009.

May 2009: Scheme launched to cover reductions in trade credit insurance cover from 1 October 2008. Two changes made to the scheme: (1) June 2009: Eligibility for the scheme was backdated from 1 April 2009 to 1 October 2008. (2) August 2009: The price was reduced and cover limits were increased. 31 December 2009: Scheme closed to new applicants and all policies will expire by 30 June 2010 at the latest.

Demand-led scheme designed to be cost neutral. Contingent liabilities under the scheme capped at a maximum of £5 billion.

Prompt Payment

Ongoing interest. However, in response to evidence of extending payment times in autumn 2008, BERR announced a range of enhanced measures focused on Government-to-business and business-to-business payment.

October 2008: commitment for all central Departments to pay invoices within 10 days—19 out of every 20 invoices are now paid in 10 days. November 2008: BERR (with leading UK business organisations) launches a series of managing cash flow guides. December 2008: BERR supports launch of a new Prompt Payment Code by the Institute of Credit Management. There are now 740 signatories.

Development of 10 managing cash flow guides—total cost in the region of £30,000.

Automotive Assistance Programme

The Automotive Assistance Programme (AAP) received European Commission State Aids approval on 27 February 2009 and was launched in March 2009.

AAP operates under the European Commission Temporary Framework for State Aids, which ends on 31 December 2010. The final maturity dates of loan guarantees and loans can extend beyond 2010.

Will support investment in automotive sector of up to £2.3 billion through loan guarantees and, exceptionally, loans.

Vehicle Scrappage Scheme

Announced in April 2009.

May 2009: Scheme launched. September 2010: Additional funding to the scheme announced.

Up to £400 million.

Response to Redundancy

Announced in November 2008.

April 2009 to December 2010.

£100 million.

Six month offer

Announced in January 2009.

April 2009 to March 2011

£83 million.

Young Person's Guarantee (Routes into work and work- focused training strands)

Announced in April 2009.

November 2009 to March 2011.

£122.4 million

Train to Gain SME flexibilities

Announced in October 2008.

On offer from January 2009. Flexibilities for funding for repeats ongoing; funding for short units due to end July 2010.

From Train to Gain budget, up to £350 million of growth over two years.

Professional and Career Development Loans (PCDLs)

Announced in the New Opportunities White Paper in January 2009.

1 July 2009: An enhanced version of the Career Development Loans programme went live. We remain committed to delivering 45,000 loans per year as soon as the capacity exists within banks to meet that target.

£12 million additional money allocated for 2009-10, with £24 million for 2010-11. This is on top of the recurrent baselines in place (to support existing Career Development Loans) of £25 million per year.

Apprenticeships (England). 35,000 additional places in 2009-10

Announced January 2009.

2009-10 financial year: 35,000 additional Apprenticeship starts in England funded by DCSF and BIS.

£140 million (BIS and DCSF).

Support for Graduates

Office for Graduate Opportunities (OGO) established in April 2009 in response to downturn. OGO responsible for several initiatives, as summarised in next column.

Internships: initial target of 5,000 internships now increased to 20,000. To be delivered by March 2010. Graduate Talent Pool website: went live in July 2009. Post-graduate study: ongoing policy to increase places—around 24,000 additional places expected—and support through PCDLs (see separate entry in table). Volunteering: 4,000 full-time and over 50,000 part-time or short-term. Help with business start-up or entrepreneurship training: including via HEFCE's Economic Challenges Investment Fund (ECIF) and Flying Start. Ongoing policy. Extra Mini-Knowledge Transfer Partnerships: 10-40 week placements in SMEs for graduates/postgraduates to work on specific projects vital to the business. Teach First: places for 2009/10 and 2010/11.

BIS funds the Graduate Talent Pool website and provided funding of £1.184 million in 2009-10 to cover infrastructure and publicity costs. In addition, BIS is working with DWP and HEFCE to deliver 10,000 subsidised internships, at a cost of around £16 million.

Employment: Bullying

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills what steps his Department is taking to reduce levels of bullying in the workplace. (308153)

Existing legislation protects workers from the most serious kinds of bullying, for instance in cases of discrimination or harassment. The Government publish information and guidance on how this legislation can be used, and ACAS provides a nationwide telephone advice line offering assistance to employers and employees on bullying and other employment issues. These measures support the Government's policy aim that workers should be able to work without fear of being bullied or harassed by employers, fellow employees or anyone else.

Approximately £1 million was committed through DTIs Partnership at Work Fund to support a project on Dignity at Work/Bullying. The project, which completed in May 2008, was led by the Amicus section of Unite and included BAE Systems, Legal and General and British Airways as partners. The project promoted best practice and workplace initiatives to tackle bullying.

In November BIS was pleased to support the launch of new Guidance on Preventing Harassment and Violence in the Workplace prepared jointly by the CBI, (Confederation of British Industry), the PPE (Partnership of Public Employers) and TUC (Trades Union Congress in association with HSE (Health and Safety Executive), and ACAS (Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service).

The joint guidance, issued following a Europe-wide agreement between employers' organisations and unions, aims to give practical help and support to firms and their employees.

This is available at:

http://www.workplaceharassment.org.uk/

European Investments Bank's 2020 Fund

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills which companies and organisations will be eligible to apply for support for green infrastructure projects from the European Investments Bank’s 2020 Fund; and over what period this Fund is intended to remain open to applications. (307621)

I have been asked to reply.

The 2020 European Fund for Energy, Climate Change and Infrastructure will be advised by an independent advisory team. The advisory team will be responsible for appraising potential investments. The Fund will focus on greenfield investments within target sectors. Investments by the Fund will be equity participations in companies which directly or indirectly own or operate infrastructure in the following target sectors:

1. Transport—TEN-T (trans-European transport networks as defined in Decision No. 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament).

2. Energy—TEN-T (trans-European energy networks as defined in Decision No. 1364/2006/EC of the European Parliament) including electricity and gas, transportation, interconnection, storage, infrastructure (including oil and gas storage, regas terminals, pipelines and related facilities and high voltage transmission) and electricity/gas distribution, electricity/gas/oil production, oil storage, as well as carbon capture and storage.

3. Mature renewables energies—including sustainable energy production, clean transport infrastructure, energy distribution and systems for hybrid transport (e.g. wind, solar, geothermal, biomass, biogas, hydro, waste to energy projects.

The advisory team will commence in the first quarter of 2010. The investment period is expected to be a four- year period from 4 March 2010.

Gilmerton Core Store

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills what response the Secretary of State has given to representations from stakeholders objecting to the closure of the core stores in Gilmerton and Loanhead. (308640)

[holding answer 6 January 2010]: My noble Friend the Secretary of State has written to my hon. Friend and my noble Friend the Minister of State for Science and Innovation will do so shortly in response to the letter from Redrock Associates International Ltd.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills what response the Secretary of State has made to the representations received from representatives of the oil, gas and carbon storage sectors on the proposed closure of the core store facilities at Gilmerton and Loanhead in Edinburgh. (308641)

[holding answer 6 January 2010]: The Department has discussed the issues with the Natural Environment Research Council and the British Geological Survey. But this is a management matter for the Natural Environment Research Council.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills whether a risk assessment has been commissioned on the effects on the national rock archive of proposed transport from Edinburgh to a proposed site in Nottinghamshire. (308642)

[holding answer 6 January 2010]: No specific risk assessment was considered necessary as the British Geological Survey (BGS) currently moves core from the oil and gas suppliers to Gilmerton and Keyworth and between its sites, and already understands and manages this risk. It also moves core as part of the International Ocean Drilling Programme across the globe. However, the British Geological Survey will undertake a combined risk assessment and methods statement nearer the time of moving. A working group of the Collections Advisory Group, including co-opted members of the Geological Society of London Petroleum Group, will consider and advise on the detail.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills what representations he has received from stakeholders on the conduct of the consultation process to close core store facilities at Gilmerton and Loanhead in Edinburgh. (308643)

[holding answer 6 January 2010]: The Department has received one letter from Redrock Associates International Ltd. and other stakeholders about the consultation process to relocate core store facilities at Gilmerton and Loanhead.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills what discussions he has had with stakeholders on the appropriateness of the proposed new site for the cores presently stored at Gilmerton and Loanhead. (308644)

[holding answer 6 January 2010]: I have had no discussions with stakeholders. These are matters for the Natural Environment Research Council.

Higher Education: Student Numbers

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills how many full-time students are in their (a) first year, (b) second year and (c) final year of an undergraduate degree course. (308181)

The latest available information from the Higher Education Statistics Agency is provided in the table.

Figures are provided for UK-domiciled full-time first degree enrolments by year of course.

UK-domiciled full-time first degree enrolments by year of course: UK Higher Education Institutions, academic year 2007/08

Year of course

First degree enrolments

First year

343,805

Second year

278,880

Third year

273,165

Fourth year or over

78,875

Total

974,720

Notes:

1. Figures are based on a HESA Standard Registration Population.

2. Figures in the answer have been rounded to the nearest five and may not sum to total.

Source:

Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA).

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills what estimate he has made of the number of residents in each local authority area who (a) have applied to start a university course in January 2010 and (b) have deferred entry from September 2009 to September 2010. (308449)

The information requested is not available centrally.

Information on applicants and accepted applicants to full-time undergraduate courses in UK institutions is collected by the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS). Accepted applicants who begin courses in January 2010 are included in the 2009/10 entry figures published by UCAS. UCAS can identify which students start courses in January, though they do not regularly publish information on the start date of courses. End of year data for the 2009/10 academic year will not be available until January 2010.

Information on deferrals is provided to BIS from UCAS, but is not broken down by local authority area.

Middlesex University: Research

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (1) how much research funding has been allocated to Middlesex university in each year since 1997; (308714)

(2) what his Department’s latest assessment of the quality of research undertaken at Middlesex university is; and if he will make a statement.

Middlesex university has received the following quality-related funding for research allocated by the Higher Education Funding Council for England:

Time series of HEFCE research funding for Middlesex university for academic years 1997-98 to 2009-10, prepared by HEFCE Analytical Services Group on 18 December 2009, figures are in cash terms, and include late grant adjustments

Middlesex university (£ million)

1997-98

1.93

1998-99

2.16

1999-2000

2.29

2000-01

2.31

2001-02

2.35

2002-03

1.76

2003-04

1.66

2004-05

1.63

2005-06

1.92

2006-07

1.86

2007-08

1.96

2008-09

1.95

2009-10

3.4

Higher Education Statistics Agency data show that Middlesex university received the following income from research councils (2008-09 data are not yet available):

Research council grants (£000)

1997-98

512

1998-99

417

1999-2000

557

2000-01

581

2001-02

335

2002-03

17

2003-04

98

2004-05

263

2005-06

339

2006-07

614

2007-08

1,247

Middlesex university achieved the following results in the Research Assessment Exercise 2008, conducted by the Higher Education Funding Council for England, which was published on 18 December 2008. The Department itself does not directly assess the quality of research undertaken at universities.

Overall quality profile (percentage of research activity at each quality level)

Unit of assessment

FTE category A staff submitted

4*

3*

2*

1*

Unclassified

11 Nursing and Midwifery

7.90

5

30

40

20

5

12 Allied Health Professions and Studies

10.10

5

25

35

30

5

23 Computer Science and Informatics

22.30

10

25

45

20

0

32 Geography and Environmental Studies

12.15

5

35

40

20

0

36 Business and Management Studies

38.79

5

25

50

20

0

38 Law

7.30

0

15

35

50

0

40 Social Work and Social Policy and Administration

15.20

5

45

40

10

0

44 Psychology

14.50

0

10

30

60

0

57 English Language and Literature

8.50

5

30

50

15

0

60 Philosophy

7.00

20

45

30

5

0

63 Art and Design

19.00

5

20

55

15

5

64 History of Art, Architecture and Design

12.00

15

40

35

10

0

65 Drama, Dance and Performing Arts

12.10

20

35

25

20

0

66 Communication, Cultural and Media Studies

4.00

0

45

25

30

0

RAE2008 quality levels

Scale

Definition

4*

Quality that is world-leading in terms of originality, significance and rigour.

3*

Quality that is internationally excellent in terms of originality, significance and rigour but which nonetheless falls short of the highest standards of excellence.

2*

Quality that is recognised internationally in terms of originality, significance and rigour.

1*

Quality that is recognised nationally in terms of originality, significance and rigour.

Unclassified

Quality that falls below the standard of nationally recognised work, or work which does not meet the published definition of research for the purposes of this assessment.

Minimum Wage: Nottingham

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills what estimate he has made of the number of people in Nottingham, North constituency who have been paid the uprated minimum wage in the last 10 years. (308493)

Data for earnings are not available at the constituency level because of small sample sizes at constituency level in the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (ASHE).

At the Government Office Region level, the lowest available, DTI previously estimated that the number of jobs that stood to benefit from the April 1999 introduction of the national minimum wage (NMW) in the east midlands region was 130,000. In 2009 the BIS estimate for the number of jobs affected by the uprating of the NMW in the east midlands region was 83,000.

Postal Services: Castle Point

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills if his Department will make an assessment of whether post office services in Castle Point constituency comply with the access criteria set out in the Network Change Programme. (308984)

I have asked Alan Cook, Managing Director of Post Office Ltd, to respond directly to the hon. Member and a copy of his reply will be placed in the Libraries of the House.

Renewable Energy: Government Assistance

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills whether his Department has contributed to the development of the Government’s proposed feed-in tariffs scheme. (307972)

The Department of Business, Innovation and Skills has contributed to the development of the Government’s proposed feed-in tariffs scheme as part of the normal policy-making process. Officials of the Department have had bilateral meetings with officials of the Department of Energy and Climate Change, are members the Renewable Financial Incentives Programme Board and have agreed the consultation proposals.

Research: Finance

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills what recent discussions he has had with the (a) Higher Education Funding Council for England and (b) Research Councils UK on the effect on fundamental scientific research of the proposed impact plans; and if he will make a statement. (308323)

[holding answer 6 January 2010]: My colleagues, officials and I discuss a range of issues with HEFCE and the Research Councils regularly.

Both HEFCE and the Research Councils recognise the breadth of ways in which impact is delivered and the long time horizons often required. Both understand impact broadly to include, for example, benefits to the economy, society, public policy, and quality of life.

The UK has a world-class research base of which we can be rightly proud: second only to the US across a broad range of disciplines and the most productive research base in the G8. Government funding for the research base has doubled in real terms since 1997 and it is right that we recognise the impact of excellent research and remove barriers to harvesting the benefits it delivers to the nation.

The Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) and the Research Councils undertake complementary work to pursue that objective. HEFCE recently consulted on proposals for the Research Excellence Framework (REF), and Research Councils have recently introduced impact statements to grant application forms.

The REF will recognise and reward university departments with a track record of delivering impacts from excellent research in the past. Research Council impact statements encourage researchers to consider the potential impact of their work when applying for grants.

Greater emphasis on impact poses no threat to fundamental research. The primary criterion of both peer review and retrospective research assessment remains research excellence.

Students

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills how many students in higher education have received payments in respect of (a) tuition fee loans, (b) maintenance loans, (c) grants for living costs, (d) bursaries and scholarships and (e) extra help for students with children or adult dependants in (i) Vale of York constituency, (ii) North Yorkshire and (iii) England in each of the last three years; and what the monetary value was of each such type of payment in each area in each such year. (307414)

The information requested is in the following tables.

Student support North Yorkshire1 academic year 2006/07 to 2008/09

Students

Value (£)

2006/07

Tuition Fee Loan

6,950

11,905,000

Maintenance Loan

9,330

35,369,000

Adult Dependant Grant

40

92,000

Childcare

50

105,000

Maintenance and other grants2

12,220

8,360,000

2007/08

Tuition Fee Loan

8,020

17,955,000

Maintenance Loan

9,470

36,662,000

Adult Dependant Grant

50

100,000

Childcare

50

118,000

Maintenance and other grants2

13,190

9,799,000

2008/09

Tuition Fee Loan

8,960

23,958,000

Maintenance Loan

9,780

39,196,000

Adult Dependant Grant

60

134,000

Childcare

70

208,000

Maintenance and other grants

14,500

11,779,000

1 Student numbers rounded to nearest 10, value of support rounded to nearest £1,000.

2 Includes Maintenance Grant, Higher Education Grant, Special Support Grant, Parental Learning Allowance, Travel Grant and Disabled Student Allowance.

Source:

Student Loans Company

Student support1 England academic years 2006/07 to 2008/09

Students (thousand)

Value (£ million)

2006/07

Tuition Fee Loan

397.3

807.7

Maintenance Loan

728.1

2,613.4

Adult Dependant Grant

6.4

14.1

Childcare

8.3

27.1

Grants for Maintenance2

320.9

471.2

2007/08

Tuition Fee Loan

553.5

1,388.6

Maintenance Loan

746.2

2,630.7

Adult Dependant Grant

6.9

15.6

Childcare

9.6

31.2

Grants for Maintenance2

395.2

713.2

2008/09

Tuition Fee Loan

696.9

1,981.1

Maintenance Loan

771.5

2,717.0

Adult Dependant Grant

7.8

18.0

Childcare

9.8

36.1

Grants for Maintenance2

495.7

1,025.0

1 Student numbers rounded to nearest 1,000, value of support rounded to nearest £ million.

2 Maintenance Grant and Higher Education Grant.

Source:

Student Loans Company

The information requested on bursaries and scholarships is not available centrally as they are the responsibility of Higher Education Institutions. Reliable information is not available at constituency level. Complete information for the current academic year 2009/10 is not yet available, and will be available in late 2010 when a Statistical First Release on Student Support will be published on the Student Loans Company website.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills how many students in higher education did not receive payments in respect of (a) tuition fee loans, (b) maintenance loans, (c) grants for living costs, (d) bursaries and scholarships and (e) extra help for students with children or adult dependants to which they were entitled before the commencement of their course in (i) Vale of York constituency, (ii) North Yorkshire and (iii) England in each of the last three years; and what the monetary value was of each such type of payment not made to students from each area in each such year before the commencement of their courses. (307415)

Tuition fee loans are not paid before commencement of the course. The information requested on bursaries and scholarships is not available centrally as they are the responsibility of higher education institutions. The other information requested in the answer cannot be produced except at disproportionate cost.

Students: Loans

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills how many students from Chesterfield constituency have received student loans for university courses in each year since 1996-97. (308995)

Students: Milton Keynes

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills how many students resident in the Milton Keynes area (a) attended university courses and (b) received student loans to attend university courses in each year since 1997. (308089)

The latest available information from the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) on enrolments from Milton Keynes local authority is shown in table 1. Figures for the 2008/09 academic year will be available in January 2010.

Table 1: Enrolments1 from Milton Keynes local authority, UK higher education institutions2, academic year 1997/98 to 2007/08

Academic year

Enrolments

1997/98

3,745

1998/99

3,935

1999/2000

4,005

2000/01

4,020

2001/02

4,250

2002/03

4,400

2003/04

4,650

2004/05

4,880

2005/06

5,055

2006/07

5,185

2007/08

5,250

1 Covers enrolments to both full-time and part-time undergraduate and postgraduate courses.

2 Excludes the Open university due to inconsistencies in its data across the time series.

Note:

Figures are based on a snapshot count as at 1 December to maintain consistency across the time series and have been rounded to the nearest five.

Source:

Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA).

Data from the Student Loans Company on the number of student loan borrowers from Milton Keynes are shown in table 2.

Table 2: Income contingent student loan borrowers, 2001/02 to 2008/091

Academic year

Students receiving loans

2001/02

2,500

2002/03

2,700

2003/04

3,000

2004/05

3,100

2005/06

3,300

2006/07

3,400

2007/08

3,600

2008/09

3,800

1 Consistent data are not available before 2001/02. Figures cover income contingent loans for maintenance and tuition fees. Older mortgage style loans are excluded.

Source:

Student Loans Company.

Data from the two sources (HESA and SLC) are not directly comparable because certain students and courses (for example postgraduate courses) included in table 1 do not attract student support. Additionally, table 2 provides those who have taken out loans, but does not include those who may have received student support in the form of a grant such as students from lower income families or those who study part-time courses.

UK Resource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills how much funding has been allocated to the UK Resource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology in each year since its formation. (308792)

The UK Resource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology was set up in September 2004 by the Department for Trade and Industry, subsequently the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (DIUS) and now the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS).

Funding has been allocated for each year as follows:

Government funding of the UKRC1

£ million

2004-05

1.39

2005-06

1.74

2006-07

2.296

2007-08

2.055

2008-09

2.522

2009-10

2.427

2010-11

2.453

1 Variously DTI/DFES/DIUS/BIS

Unemployment

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills what methodology his Department used to determine the number of people not in education, employment or training expected to start courses in January as part of the January Guarantee. (307324)

I have been asked to reply.

We are determined to ensure that every 16 and 17-year-old who is not in education, employment or training (NEET) is given an opportunity to engage in learning so that they can develop the skills they will need for the upturn. The January Guarantee will ensure that all 16 and 17-year-olds who are NEET in January 2010 have the offer of an entry to employment place.

Information provided by Connexions services shows that there were around 60,000 16 and 17-year-olds NEET in January 2009. Many of these young people will already have a job or a place in learning to start in January, while there are others whose personal circumstances will prevent a return to learning at this time.

Children, Schools and Families

British Educational Communications and Technology Agency: Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how much BECTA has cost in each year since 2007; and if he will make a statement. (307593)

The funding allocation from the Department for Children, Schools and Families to British Educational Communication and Technology Agency (BECTA) for 2007-08 was £38,394,000 and for 2008-09 was £61,550,000.

The funding allocations are from DCSF and other Government grants for expenditure to support the effective use of technology across the education and skills sectors.

BTEC Diplomas

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many 16-year-olds completed a BTEC First Diploma in each subject in (a) Leeds West constituency, (b) West Yorkshire and (c) England in each of the last five years. (306621)

The following tables shows the number of 16-year-olds in (a) Leeds West constituency, (b) West Yorkshire and (c) England who completed a BTEC First Diploma in each subject in each of the last five years for which information is available.

BTEC First Diploma awards achieved by those with an academic age of 16 in Leeds West constituency, 2003/08

Year in which qualification was achieved

Qualification title: Edexcel level 2 BTEC First Diploma:

2003/04

2004/05

2005/06

2006/07

2007/08

For ICT Practitioners

0

0

0

0

0

For IT Practitioners (General)

0

0

0

0

0

For IT Practitioners (ICT Systems Support)

0

0

0

0

0

For IT Practitioners (Software Development)

0

0

0

0

0

In Agriculture

0

0

0

0

0

In Animal Care

0

0

0

0

0

In Applied Science

0

0

0

0

0

In Art and Design

0

0

0

0

0

In Business

0

0

0

0

0

In Caring

0

0

0

0

0

In Children’s Care, Learning and Development

0

0

0

*

*

In Construction

0

0

0

0

0

In Countryside and Environment

0

0

0

0

0

In Design

0

0

0

0

0

In Early Years

0

0

*

0

0

In Electronics

0

0

0

0

0

In Engineering

0

0

0

*

5

In Fish Husbandry

0

0

0

0

0

In Floristry

0

0

0

0

0

In Front Line Services

0

0

0

0

0

In Health and Social Care

0

0

0

8

9

In Horse Care

0

0

0

0

0

In Horticulture

0

0

0

0

0

In Hospitality

0

0

0

0

0

In Land-based Technology

0

0

0

0

0

In Logistics

0

0

0

0

0

In Manufacturing Engineering

0

0

*

0

0

In Media

0

0

0

0

0

In Music

0

0

0

0

0

In Operations and Maintenance Engineering

0

0

0

0

0

In Performing Arts

0

0

0

0

0

In Public Services

0

0

0

0

0

In Retail

0

0

0

0

0

In Sport

0

0

0

0

0

In Sport and Exercise Sciences

0

0

0

0

0

In Travel and Tourism

0

0

0

0

*

In Vehicle Service and Technology

0

0

0

0

0

Total

0

0

*

14

18

BTEC First Diploma awards achieved by those with an academic age of 16 in West Yorkshire, 2003/08

Year in which qualification was achieved

Qualification title: Edexcel level 2 BTEC First Diploma:

2003/04

2004/05

2005/06

2006/07

2007/08

For ICT Practitioners

0

0

0

112

164

For IT Practitioners (General)

7

10

28

0

0

For IT Practitioners (ICT Systems Support)

*

7

20

0

0

For IT Practitioners (Software Development)

0

6

6

0

0

In Agriculture

0

0

0

0

0

In Animal Care

49

55

78

58

59

In Applied Science

0

0

0

30

36

In Art and Design

0

23

49

64

89

In Business

10

54

87

127

181

In Caring

27

53

45

0

0

In Children’s Care, Learning and Development

0

0

0

45

57

In Construction

6

9

25

45

52

In Countryside and Environment

0

0

0

0

0

In Design

20

17

7

*

0

In Early Years

32

23

52

0

0

In Electronics

0

0

0

0

0

In Engineering

0

0

0

21

25

In Fish Husbandry

0

0

0

0

0

In Floristry

0

0

0

0

0

In Front Line Services

0

0

0

0

0

In Health and Social Care

0

0

25

191

200

In Horse Care

5

11

*

10

*

In Horticulture

0

4

*

*

0

In Hospitality

0

0

0

0

*

In Land-based Technology

0

0

0

0

0

In Logistics

0

0

0

0

0

In Manufacturing Engineering

19

13

16

0

0

In Media

5

7

10

21

25

In Music

0

0

0

31

48

In Operations and Maintenance Engineering

*

0

4

0

0

In Performing Arts

55

81

87

67

67

In Public Services

75

82

106

106

97

In Retail

0

0

0

0

0

In Sport

37

45

47

115

121

In Sport and Exercise Sciences

24

39

29

0

0

In Travel and Tourism

6

55

54

45

50

In Vehicle Service and Technology

4

0

0

0

0

Total

385

594

779

1,091

1,276

BTEC First Diploma awards achieved by those with an academic age of 16 in England, 2003/08

Year in which qualification was achieved

Qualification title: Edexcel level 2 BTEC First Diploma:

2003/04

2004/05

2005/06

2006/07

2007/08

For ICT Practitioners

0

0

0

2,847

3,456

For IT Practitioners (General)

598

1,169

1,465

7

0

For IT Practitioners (ICT Systems Support)

107

207

332

0

0

For IT Practitioners (Software Development)

188

224

297

*

0

In Agriculture

75

72

102

98

103

In Animal Care

795

906

951

1,079

1,176

In Applied Science

87

208

346

658

782

In Art and Design

0

521

1,743

2,906

3,274

In Business

307

949

1,992

3,515

4,790

In Caring

561

1,018

385

*

0

In Children’s Care, Learning and Development

0

0

0

803

991

In Construction

50

130

338

523

532

In Countryside and Environment

79

92

152

148

162

In Design

587

790

561

3

0

In Early Years

439

628

936

7

0

In Electronics

130

156

240

0

0

In Engineering

0

0

0

1,020

1,205

In Fish Husbandry

27

47

42

42

50

In Floristry

*

8

14

18

23

In Front Line Services

0

0

0

0

0

In Health and Social Care

0

0

1,524

3296

4,058

In Horse Care

245

284

258

279

289

In Horticulture

138

108

156

172

182

In Hospitality

0

16

88

143

169

In Land-based Technology

0

0

0

33

34

In Logistics

0

0

4

0

20

In Manufacturing Engineering

479

556

690

7

11

In Media

232

868

1,182

1,501

1,718

In Music

0

0

0

822

1,001

In Operations and Maintenance Engineering

71

89

113

0

*

In Performing Arts

1,644

2,048

2,425

1,735

1,737

In Public Services

1,674

2,176

2,563

2,892

3,310

In Retail

*

27

111

139

241

In Sport

1,489

2,248

2,827

4,147

4,246

In Sport and Exercise Sciences

630

604

601

7

*

In Travel and Tourism

231

933

1361

1,595

1,981

In Vehicle Service and Technology

216

196

205

245

290

Total

11,086

17,278

24,004

30,689

35,843

* = Figures less than 3 have been suppressed.

Source:

National Information System for Vocational Qualifications.

Children: Social Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what recent estimate he has made of the cost of conducting a serious case review. (307266)

The costs of conducting a serious case review are not held centrally. It is the responsibility of each Local Safeguarding Children Board to undertake a serious case review where appropriate. The costs will vary considerably depending on the complexity of the case and the cost of the independent overview author.

Christmas

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many Christmas trees were purchased by his Department in each of the last five years; what the cost was of those trees in each year; from where the trees were sourced; what account was taken of the sustainability of the sources of the trees; and by what process the trees were disposed of. (305646)

The Department for Children, Schools and Families was created on 28 June 2007. Since then four Christmas trees have been purchased from a sustainable source at a total cost of £2,100. This included delivery and installation costs. The supplier has advised that for every tree that is cut down, another is grown. The trees are shredded and recycled.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how much his Department budgeted for Christmas trees in 2009. (306148)

[holding answer 10 December 2009]: The Department for Children, Schools and Families budgeted £550 for Christmas trees in 2009.

Departmental Buildings

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many smart meters are in use in his Department's main building; and (a) when and (b) at what cost such meters were installed. (303924)

At the present time no smart meters are in use in the Department for Children, Schools Families main building. However, funding has been secured from the Department for Energy and Climate Change for the installation of sub-metering which will enable us to identify where the most electricity is being consumed so that it can be targeted in the future.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how much his Department spent on works and refurbishment to offices allocated to Ministers in his Department's buildings in the last 12 months. (305690)

Expenditure in respect of works and refurbishments to Ministers' offices in the last year was £19,876.00. This follows the appointment of an additional Minister to the Department in June 2009, which required a new office to be created.

Departmental Conferences

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families which conferences held overseas have been attended by civil servants based in his Department in the last three years; and what the cost to the public purse was of such attendance at each conference. (305873)

Departmental Hotels

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what expenditure his Department incurred on hotel accommodation in 2008-09. (301388)

The Department for Children, Schools and Families was established in June 2007. Expenditure on hotel accommodation during 2008-09 was £1,510,651.

Departmental Meetings

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families which (a) individuals other than ministerial colleagues and officials of his Department and (b) organisations he met in an official capacity in the week commencing 9 November 2009. (301165)

In its response to a report by the Public Administration Select Committee “Lobbying: Access and influence in Whitehall”, the Government agreed to publish on-line, on a quarterly basis, information about ministerial meetings with outside interest groups. Information for the period 1 October 2009 to 31 December 2009 will be published by Departments as soon as the information is ready.

Departmental Pay

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many (a) year end and (b) in-year bonuses have been paid to officials in his Department in each of the last three years; and what expenditure his Department has incurred on such bonuses in each year. (301302)

The wages/salary bill for 2006-07 was £132.4 million of which non-consolidated performance payments represented 1.7 per cent. All employees are eligible for non-consolidated performance payments, subject to strict criteria in line with the Government’s policy on public sector pay. Senior civil service non-consolidated payments are determined as part of a central performance management framework managed by the Cabinet Office. Payments for other grades are subject to the pay remit process and reflect previous pay settlements. Non-consolidated performance payments have to be re-earned each year and do not add to future pay bill costs (e.g. pensions) and are an integral element of the reward package for staff.

The information for 2006/07 refers to the former Department for Education and Skills.

Number of non-consolidated payments

Expenditure (£ million)

2006-07

1,235

1.9

The wages/salary bill for 2007-08 was £111.9 million of which non-consolidated performance payments represented 1.9 per cent.

Number of non-consolidated payments

Expenditure (£ million)

2007-08

1,669

2.1

The wages/salary bill for 2008-09 was £111.8 million of which non-consolidated performance payments represented 1.9 per cent.

Number of non-consolidated payments

Expenditure (£ million)

2008-09

1,403

1.9

Departmental Training

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many overseas training courses were attended by his Department's civil servants in the latest period for which figures are available; how many civil servants attended each course; and what the total cost to the public purse was of each course. (305902)

We hold records on training provided centrally. In the 12 months to the end of November 2009, one employee attended a training course where an element of it was delivered overseas. This was a leadership development programme at the National School of Government which consisted of six modules of which five were delivered locally in the UK. The total cost was £14,500, with the overseas element of the programme amounting to £4,350.

A number of training courses are agreed locally and a detailed check of those records to see if any involved an element of overseas travel would incur disproportionate cost.

Driving

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what mechanisms are in place to ensure that staff who drive (a) a vehicle for which his Department is responsible have valid driving licences and (b) their own vehicles in the course of their official duties have valid driving licences and insurance; what guidance is issued to those staff in respect of road safety while carrying out official duties; what steps are taken to monitor compliance with that guidance; what requirements there are on such staff to report to their line managers accidents in which they are involved while driving in the course of their official duties; and whether such reports are investigated. (302171)

The Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) has travel policy in place for staff which is accessible via the Department's intranet. This guidance states clear roles and responsibilities for managers and staff. The responses to the questions raised are:

ix(a) Mechanisms are in place to ensure that staff hold valid driving licences for any vehicles the Department is responsible for. (The Department does not own any vehicles.)

(b) Mechanisms are in place to ensure that staff who use their own vehicles for official business must have valid driving licences and insurance. Before using their own vehicles for official travel, staff must complete an application form which, together with copies of their Motor Vehicle Insurance Certificate, MOT certificate (if appropriate) and a business case signed by at least a Deputy Director, is sent to the Professional Services and Commodities Category Unit for approval.

(c) Road safety guidance for staff. The Department has produced a “Safe Driving Policy” booklet (available via the intranet) which provides road safety guidance. It is expected that compliance to the departmental guidelines is observed by staff.

(d) Steps to monitor compliance to the guidance. Staff have the responsibility to ensure compliance with the guidance.

(e) Requirements to report accidents. All accidents associated with hire companies are brought to the attention of the Professional Services and Commodities Category Unit for investigation.

(f) Accident reports are investigated. All notified motor vehicle accidents are thoroughly investigated.

Education Maintenance Allowance

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what plans his Department has to extend the education maintenance allowance to age groups other than those currently eligible; and if he will make a statement. (307442)

The policy intention of education maintenance allowance is to encourage more young people aged 16 to 19 from low-income families to participate in post-compulsory learning. We do not have plans to extend the eligible age group.

Adult learners (aged 19-plus) can apply for the adult learning grant (ALG). This pays up to £30 per week, during term time, to those on low incomes undertaking full-time learning for their first full level 2 or first full level 3 qualification. Young people in receipt of EMA can move on to ALG when they become 19 where they remain in learning.

Educational Institutions: Vetting

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (1) what sanctions will be taken against language schools which use host families for foreign students who have not undergone vetting and barring scheme or Criminal Records Bureau checks; (306472)

(2) how many representations he has received from language schools on the application of the vetting and barring scheme and Criminal Records Bureau checks for host families for foreign children in the last six months.

There are currently no requirements on language schools to conduct Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) checks on the individuals they engage to host foreign students.

Acting as host parents for a student at a language school is regulated activity under the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006. Engaging in regulated activity will normally require registration with the Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA). However, as announced by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families on 14 December 2009, Official Report, column 50WS, in his response to the Sir Roger Singleton’s report “Drawing the Line” on the vetting and barring scheme, we shall lift the requirement for registration for exchange visits where the student’s parents accept responsibility for the selection of the host family, the host parents are unpaid volunteers, and the visit lasts less than 28 days.

Where these conditions are not met, the requirement for registration of the host parents will remain in place. Where the requirement for registration applies, a language school that uses host parents without checking their ISA registration status would commit an offence under section 11 of the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006. Under section 11(9), the maximum penalty for this offence is a fine of up to level 5 on the standard scale (currently £5,000).

The Department for Children, Schools and Families has not received any representations from language schools on this issue during the last six months.

Engagement Programme Funding

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what proportion of 14 to 19 engagement programme funding is allocated to (a) schools, (b) colleges and (c) other organisations in 2009/10; and if he will make a statement. (308178)

The Key Stage 4 engagement programme is a locally shaped and managed initiative and local authorities have developed a range of models for delivering the programme in their area. DCSF funding for 2009/10 totals £19,334,000 and this is used in different ways by the 142 local authorities involved. Detailed data breaking down how each local authority is deploying this resource are not kept centrally and therefore it is not possible to provide the overview sought by the hon. Member.

GCSE

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many and what proportion of pupils of each ethnic group at the end of Key Stage 4 who were (a) eligible and (b) not eligible for free school meals achieved five A* grades at GCSE including English and mathematics, excluding equivalents, in each year since 1997. (309184)

Home Education

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families whether he has received any reports of (a) abuse and (b) poor educational practice in the home educated environment in the last 12 months; and if he will make a statement. (308176)

The Department collected statistical information relating to safeguarding and educational concerns about home educated children that can be found at

http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/everychildmatters/ete/independentreviewofhomeeducation/irhomeeducation/

Some reports of specific instances of abuse or poor educational practice were made to Graham Badman and DCSF as part of the background evidence collected for the Review of Elective Home Education in England.

Hotels

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how much his Department spent on hotel accommodation for (a) Ministers, (b) special advisers and (c) civil servants in each of the last five years. (305669)

Expenditure on hotels on behalf on individuals is not held separately. The following table shows the cumulative spend for Ministers, special advisers and civil servants for each of the last five years.

Financial years

Hotels (£)

2005

1,161,915

2006

1,039,714

2007

1,006,349

2008

1,191,780

2009

1,510,651

Travel by Ministers, civil servants and special advisers is undertaken in accordance with the ministerial code and the civil service management code respectively.

Independent Safeguarding Authority

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what communication there has been between the National Safeguarding Delivery Unit and the Independent Safeguarding Authority since July 2009. (307852)

The National Safeguarding Delivery Unit (NSDU) does not routinely communicate with the Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA). The ISA has been asked to join the Partnership Network, a broad coalition of partners, including key voluntary sector and professional stakeholders, which has been established to work with the NSDU to pursue specific issues impacting on effective front-line safeguarding practice.

Sir Roger Singleton provides advice and challenge to the NSDU in his independent capacity as chief adviser on the safety of children.

Personal Social and Health Education

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families whether education about homosexual relationships is a compulsory part of the school curriculum for (a) primary school and (b) secondary school pupils. (304224)

Under existing legislation, secondary schools are required by law to provide sex education, but there is no requirement for primary schools to provide sex education. Both primary and secondary schools are also required to deliver the statutory science curriculum, which includes age-appropriate information on human biology. In addition we expect schools to provide a much broader programme of sex and relationships education (SRE) through well planned and non-statutory personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education. As part of this programme schools should teach about all types of relationships that exist within society, including homosexual relationships.

SRE should be taught gradually, so that learning can be built upon year-by-year in a way that is appropriate to the age and maturity of each child. For example, SRE in primary schools will address issues of differences and bullying.

We have announced our intention to legislate to make PSHE education, including SRE, a statutory subject within the national curriculum at key stages 1-4.

Provisions are included within the Children, Schools and Families Bill which will give effect to this change. Further information is available in the written ministerial statement by the Secretary of State on 5 November 2009, Official Report, columns 49-52WS.

Pupils: Epilepsy

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (1) if he will produce an action plan to improve the results achieved at school by children with epilepsy; (307918)

(2) what recent discussions he has had with epilepsy representative groups to improve educational outcomes for children with epilepsy.

The Government are committed to closing the gap in educational achievement between children with special educational needs and their peers.

The Department for Children Schools and Families and the Department of Health are currently engaged with key stakeholders, including those from organisations representing epilepsy, in developing revised guidance to schools on how to support children and young people with medical needs. The guidance will support schools to develop policies in relation to managing the health needs of children and young people: this will include advice to teachers and support staff on how to administer medicines. We have a stakeholder meeting scheduled for January at which we will discuss how the organisations representing the conditions can enhance the guidance.

In the Children's Plan progress report, we announced £31 million for the two-year Achievement for All project to improve outcomes for all children and young people with special educational needs and disability which would include children with epilepsy who have additional needs. The project is taking place in around 450 schools across 10 local authorities for two years from September 2009 until September 2011.

Pupils: Religious Freedom

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families whether his Department has made an assessment of the implications for his Department’s policies of the European Court of Human Rights ruling in the case of Lautsi v Italy on educational institutions in England. (308765)

We are currently considering the implications of this ruling but our early conclusions are that we believe that the circumstances in Italy are clearly different from those in England and that such a ruling would have no impact on our schools provision. This is because the concerns of the court in this case, which lead to the breach of human rights conclusion, were around the lack of pluralism in the Italian education system—that there was no choice for non-Christian parents/pupils in Italy since every classroom in every school must be adorned with a crucifix—as set out in a Royal Decree. This is certainly not the case in England where there is no such universal display of religious imagery. Parental choice is a key feature of our education system and the majority of schools are maintained schools of no particular religion but there is also the choice available of faith schools catering for many different faiths.

School Meals

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what estimate he has made of the average cost of providing a school meal in the latest period for which figures are available. (308977)

The Department does not collect this information. However, the Fourth Annual Survey of Take-up of School Lunches in England, published in November 2009 by the School Food Trust and the Local Authority Caterers Association, gives average lunch prices in 2008/09 of £1.77 in primary schools, and £1.88 in secondary schools. Information on the average cost of providing a school meal is not collected by the survey.

Schools

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many (a) primary and (b) secondary schools were (i) opened and (ii) closed in each region in each year since 1997. (305058)

The information is provided in the following tables.

Source:

EduBase 2

Phase of education and year of opening

Middle Deemed Primary

Primary

Government Office Region

1997

2002

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Grand total

East Midlands

3

2

7

3

26

9

2

10

8

8

11

10

1

100

East of England

4

6

6

16

13

8

13

11

11

8

24

13

5

138

London

1

1

1

1

11

20

21

16

22

14

16

9

7

7

8

6

4

165

North East

4

5

3

6

3

10

10

7

6

14

4

5

3

80

North West

13

11

16

7

17

23

20

15

16

10

16

12

7

183

South East

11

2

14

12

16

9

12

21

13

13

19

18

4

164

South West

1

1

1

1

1

4

13

15

15

10

4

9

5

17

18

13

12

12

152

West Midlands

7

8

13

16

8

8

12

17

17

13

31

4

11

165

Yorkshire and the Humber

6

3

9

13

8

15

10

11

12

8

15

5

6

121

Grand total

1

1

1

1

2

1

2

63

70

104

104

123

100

104

106

107

99

141

85

53

1,268

Phase of education and year of opening

MDS

Secondary

Government Office Region

2001

2004

2006

2008

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Grand total

East Midlands

1

1

3

1

1

3

1

11

East of England

1

1

1

1

1

1

3

3

12

London

2

2

8

3

3

4

1

2

1

1

2

29

North East

1

1

1

2

2

2

1

1

1

12

North West

2

1

1

4

3

2

1

3

3

9

3

1

6

39

South East

1

2

2

3

1

3

2

2

1

2

1

20

South West

1

2

2

1

1

1

3

2

13

West Midlands

2

1

1

3

1

5

1

14

Yorkshire and the Humber

1

1

3

3

1

2

2

13

Grand total

2

1

1

1

9

7

18

15

21

12

9

11

8

17

19

1

11

163

MDS = Middle Deemed Secondary Schools

Phase of education and year of closures

Middle Deemed Primary

Government Office Region

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

East Midlands

East of England

1

12

3

London

3

1

1

1

1

North East

North West

South East

2

3

3

3

1

8

5

South West

2

1

1

4

1

1

West Midlands

1

1

Yorkshire and the Humber

2

Grand total

4

3

3

6

4

3

9

5

2

13

10

Primary

Government Office Region

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Grand total

East Midlands

8

4

7

7

38

16

11

11

28

18

27

30

10

215

East of England

2

16

7

23

29

13

27

20

25

11

35

27

5

256

London

30

38

41

26

37

27

30

23

12

14

19

15

18

337

North East

9

13

7

12

12

22

21

17

14

26

13

20

10

196

North West

53

33

43

21

43

62

42

41

49

41

39

42

20

529

South East

24

7

21

15

28

17

16

28

22

37

33

34

7

314

South West

8

37

19

24

13

14

12

12

32

35

34

24

27

301

West Midlands

20

15

30

31

21

22

25

39

36

36

48

11

24

360

Yorkshire and the Humber

14

8

19

23

23

31

24

26

24

28

32

18

14

286

Grand total

168

171

194

182

244

224

208

217

242

246

280

221

135

2,794

Phase of education and year of closure

Middle Deemed Secondary

Government Office Region

1997

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

East Midlands

2

9

15

East of England

3

1

London

2

North East

3

2

5

1

2

3

2

4

3

North West

South East

10

5

2

South West

3

5

West Midlands

4

1

11

1

Yorkshire and the Humber

7

57

1

Grand total

9

60

18

7

11

21

8

3

11

11

5

Secondary

Government Office Region

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Grand total

East Midlands

4

1

8

3

6

1

4

6

1

8

10

78

East of England

2

3

2

2

1

3

5

9

5

10

46

London

1

6

1

4

3

3

6

7

6

8

7

54

North East

2

3

2

4

5

5

4

2

7

59

North West

2

6

9

7

5

2

4

5

16

8

16

22

102

South East

1

3

4

3

4

3

3

1

2

1

7

8

12

69

South West

4

4

1

3

1

1

3

4

5

34

West Midlands

3

4

3

2

1

4

10

7

9

60

Yorkshire and the Humber

1

1

3

4

4

1

4

2

6

8

3

14

116

Grand total

8

16

32

27

30

27

23

21

18

40

55

61

96

618

Special Educational Needs

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what estimate he has made of the cost of undertaking an assessment for special educational needs. (307260)

The Department has not made an estimate of the average cost of a statutory assessment of a child’s special educational needs (SEN). However, in 2002 the Audit Commission published a report “Statutory assessment and statements of SEN: in need of review?” which estimated the overall cost of producing an SEN statement, including the assessment, was £2,500.

Teachers: Pay

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many and what proportion of schoolteachers earn more than £18,000 a year. (306336)

This information is not available in the format requested because records are incomplete for part-time and unqualified teachers.

All full-time qualified teachers in service in local authority maintained schools earn more than £18,000 per annum. The minimum salary for qualified teachers in England and Wales excluding the London area is £21,102 and for unqualified teachers £15,461.

International Development

Commonwealth: Health Services

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development pursuant to the written ministerial statement of 30 November 2009, Official Report, columns 113-14WS, on the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting; if he will publish the Commonwealth Health Compact agreement; whether under the agreement Commonwealth citizens who are visitors and lawfully in the UK will be entitled to free hospital care and treatment if admission to hospital was non-elective and the need for admission and treatment was unforeseen before the individual’s entry into the UK; and if he will make a statement. (309548)

The commitments made in Commonwealth Health Compact agreed at the Commonwealth Heads of Governments meeting in Trinidad and Tobago in November 2009 are set out in the paragraph 93 of the official communiqué of the meeting. In the Compact Heads of Government:

Called on donor countries to deliver existing commitments for financing in health and identify ways to increase international resources;

Welcomed the steps taken by low-income countries towards universal access to health services, making them free at the point of use and urged further concerted action;

Support the role of civil society to advocate for, support and contribute to universal coverage of basic health care.

The compact focuses on efforts to support developing countries to meet the domestic health needs of their own populations, particularly by strengthening health systems and removing financial barriers to the poor in accessing to domestic health services. The compact is not relevant to and makes no commitments on the provision of health services by any country to visiting foreign nationals.

Departmental Conferences

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development how much was spent by his Department on conferences they organised which were subsequently cancelled in each of the last three years; and what the title was of each such conference. (308831)

The Department for International Development (DFID) cancelled one conference within the last three financial years, 2006-07 to 2008-09. The conference was titled ‘Tackling Overseas Bribery’ and was scheduled to take place from 3-4 September 2008. The cost of cancellation was £7,500.

Departmental Legislation

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what criminal offences have been (a) created and (b) abolished by secondary legislation sponsored by his Department since 1 May 2008. (307808)

The Department for International Development (DFID) has sponsored no secondary legislation that has created or abolished a criminal offence since 1 May 2008.

Offenders

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development how many employees of his Department have been convicted of a criminal offence of each type in each year since 1997. (308516)

The Department for International Development (DFID) holds details of criminal convictions on classified individual personal security files. We do not maintain a central record of the number of staff convicted of criminal offences.

Health

AIDS: North West

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) males and (b) females were diagnosed with AIDS in (i) Chorley, (ii) Lancashire and (ii) the North West in each of the last five years. (308407)

There were no reported new HIV diagnoses or first AIDS diagnoses in the local authority area of Chorley between 2004 and 2008.

The information requested relating to Lancashire and the North West is shown in the following table.

Area of diagnosis

Report type

Sex

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

North West

New HIV diagnoses

Males

426

460

445

385

407

Females

220

249

194

196

206

First AIDS diagnoses

Males

71

68

60

75

49

Females

35

17

23

27

12

Lancashire1

New HIV diagnoses

Males

67

83

56

44

56

Females

20

16

10

19

21

First AIDS diagnoses

Males

13

9

13

17

14

Females

<5

<5

<5

<5

<5

1 Does not include sites situated in either Greater Manchester or Merseyside.

Notes:

1. Diagnoses are from reports received to end June 2009. Numbers will rise as further reports are received.

2. Data include individuals who have an existing infection as well as those who have a newly acquired infection and therefore the data do not present incidence of infection.

3. The area in which an individual is diagnosed is not necessarily the area of residence.

4. AIDS diagnoses relate to a person’s first diagnosis of an AIDS defining illness. Subsequent diagnoses are not recorded.

Source:

Health Protection Agency.

Alcoholism: Health Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what percentage of alcohol-related hospital admissions in each strategic health authority area were repeat admissions in (a) 2007-08 and (b) 2008-09. (308250)

Babies: Screening

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what professional qualifications are required for a health practitioner in the NHS to perform the Ortolani and Barlow manoeuvre at the newborn and six to eight week physical examination. (308274)

Registered medical practitioners undertake these examinations. They are most commonly done by general practitioners or paediatricians. They will have had additional training, but no further qualifications are required.

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence clinical guideline, “Routine postnatal care of women and their babies”, states that within 72 hours of birth and at six to eight weeks the baby’s hips should be checked using the Barlow and Ortolani manoeuvres.

The guideline also advises that all health care professionals who care for mothers and babies should work within the relevant competencies developed by Skills for Health:

www.skillsforhealth.org.uk

Relevant health care professionals should also have demonstrated competency and sufficient ongoing clinical experience in undertaking maternal and newborn physical examinations and recognising abnormalities.

Bowel Cancer: Screening

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what steps his Department is taking to increase participation rates in bowel cancer screening in (a) Waltham Forest, (b) Redbridge, (c) London and (d) England. (309317)

Primary care trusts (PCTs) are responsible for screening services, including the promotion of the NHS bowel screening programme. We would expect those areas with low bowel screening uptake rates to develop targeted programmes to tackle this locally. NHS London has advised that both Redbridge and Waltham Forest PCTs are working to address the issue of low uptake among their local eligible populations.

As the screening programme was implemented in local areas, NHS cancer screening programmes sent out an information pack to all local general practitioners (GPs). As well as explaining how the programme works, the packs contained promotional information, including posters for GPs to use to promote the programme in their own practices.

The National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative, launched in November 2008, is working with NHS cancer screening programmes on key messages and awareness programmes to improve screening uptake, particularly in deprived groups.

Central Lancashire Primary Care Trust: Nurses

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many nurses were employed in the area covered by Central Lancashire Primary Care Trust in (a) 1997 and (b) the latest period for which figures are available. (308658)

The information is not available in the format requested. The following table shows the numbers of qualified nursing staff for the organisations specified.

Number (headcount) as at 30 September each year

2002

2008

Total specified organisations

All qualified nursing staff

2,709

3,098

Qualified hospital and community health services (HCHS) nursing staff

2,545

2,945

General practitioner (GP) practice nurses

164

153

of which:

Central Lancashire Primary Care Trust (PCT)

All qualified nursing staff

794

937

Qualified HCHS nursing staff

630

784

GP practice nurses

164

153

Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

All qualified nursing staff

1,915

2,161

Qualified HCHS nursing staff

1,915

2,161

GP practice nurses

n/a

n/a

n/a = not applicable

Notes:

1. Due to organisation changes it is not possible to provide comparable data for the area covered by Central Lancashire PCT with any degree of accuracy prior to 2002.

2. Data Quality: Work force statistics are compiled from data sent by more than 300 national health service trusts and PCTs in England. The NHS Information Centre for health and social care liaises closely with these organisations to encourage submission of complete and valid data and seeks to minimise inaccuracies and the effect of missing and invalid data. Processing methods and procedures are continually being updated to improve data quality. Where this happens any impact on figures already published will be assessed but unless this is significant at national level they will not be changed. Where there is impact only at detailed or local level this will be footnoted in relevant analyses.

Source:

The Information Centre for health and social care General and Personal Medical Services Statistics

The Information Centre for health and social care Non-medical Workforce Census

Central Lancashire Primary Care Trust: Waiting Lists

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the average waiting time for (a) an in-patient and (b) an out-patient in the Central Lancashire Primary Care Trust was in (i) 1997 and (ii) the latest period for which figures are available. (308656)

The information is not available in the format requested. The following table shows the median in-patient waiting time for elective admission patients still waiting in all specialties for the time period 1997-2009 for commissioner organisations in the central Lancashire area.

Organisation

Waiting time (weeks)

Month ending March 1997

North West Lancashire Health Authority (HA)

11.9

South Lancashire HA

15.4

Month Ending October 2009

Central Lancashire Primary Care Trust (PCT)

2.8

Notes:

1. Figures are shown for organisations that existed at the time

2. In-patient waiting times are measured from decision to admit by the consultant to admission to hospital.

3. The figures show the median waiting times for patients still waiting for admission at the end of the period stated.

4. Median waiting times are calculated from aggregate data, rather than patient level data, and therefore are only estimates of the position on average waits.

5. In particular, specialties with low numbers waiting are prone to fluctuations in the median. This should be taken into account when interpreting the data.

Source:

Department of Health waiting list collections QF01 and MMRCOM

The following table shows the median out-patient waiting time for a first out-patient appointment for patients seen in the year in all specialties for the time period 1997-2007 for commissioner organisations in the central Lancashire area.

Organisation

Waiting time (weeks)

Financial year 1997-98

South Lancashire HA

7.5

North West Lancashire HA

6.0

Financial year 2007-08

Central Lancashire PCT

4.5

The following table shows the median out-patient waiting time for a first out-patient appointment for patients still waiting at the period end in all specialties for the time period 2005-09 for commissioner organisations in the central Lancashire area.

Organisation

Waiting time (weeks)

Month ending March 2005

Chorley and South Ribble PCT

4.7

West Lancashire PCT

5.3

Preston PCT

4.6

Month ending October 2009

Central Lancashire PCT

2.6

Notes:

1. Figures are shown for organisations that existed at the time.

2. Out-patient waiting times are measured from referral by the GP to first out-patient appointment to the consultant.

3. From 1997-98 all time bands for out-patients seen were first collected so only average waiting first out-patient times can be made from this point in time.

4. The out-patient seen figures relate to the average wait for patients seen during the whole of each year except for 2007-08 where figures relate to quarters 1 and 2 combined.

5. The last time these data were collected for each specialty was for period ending September 2007.

6. From 2004-05 all time bands for out-patients not seen were first collected so only average waiting first out-patient times on a waiting basis can be made from this point in time.

7. Median waiting times are calculated from aggregate data, rather than patient level data, and therefore are only estimates of the position on average waits.

8. In particular, specialties with low numbers waiting are prone to fluctuations in the median. This should be taken into account when interpreting the data.

9. Historically, since 1997, we collected out-patient waiting times based on numbers seen during the quarter (the QM08 return). In addition, we collected data on a ‘still waiting’ basis in our monthly return alongside our in-patient waiting times figures. However, unlike the in-patient figures, we did not collect the full waiting list on out-patients, just the long waiters. Therefore, it was not possible to calculate the average wait on this basis.

10. Since 2004-05, we collected the full out-patient waiting list, hence we could start calculating average waits on the same basis as in-patients from this date. We have since phased out the out-patient ‘seen’ collection, so we now can only use the ‘still waiting’ or ‘not seen’ figures.

11. The result of this is that average waits appear lower on the ‘still waiting’ basis simply because this is collected as a snapshot of patients waiting time at the end of the month before they have been seen. Therefore, the averages appear lower, but we have provided both sets so that users can see the effect and trend.

Source:

Department of Health waiting list collections QM08R and MMRCOM

Community Health Services: Medical Equipment

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what (a) research and (b) consultation his Department undertook before instructing local authorities to become the accrediting bodies for the Transforming Community Equipment and Wheelchairs Services retail model; and how many retailers have registered with local authorities for the purpose of providing such services; (309283)

(2) how many retailers have registered with the Community Equipment Dispensing Accreditation Board;

(3) how many organisations are using prescriptions for wheelchairs under the Transforming Community Equipment and Wheelchairs Services retail model.

The Department has carried out a review of the developing retail marketplace and obtained feedback from the five local authorities and health partners who implemented a retail model by April 2009. Results show that most authorities prefer to undertake accreditation and monitoring of retailers within their localities using existing supplier vetting procedures. The Department does not collect information on how many retailers have registered with local authorities for the purpose of providing equipment.

The Department has not collected information on the number of retailers who may have received accreditation through the Community Equipment Dispensing Accreditation Board, and the Department did not renew its endorsement of national accreditation after 30 September 2009.

The prescription within the retail model has been designed for simple community equipment aids to daily living and does not include a delivery model for wheelchair services.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) how many equipment stores have been decommissioned as a result of the implementation of the Transforming Community Equipment and Wheelchairs Services retail model; and what model is in place to provide the complex aids to daily living in areas in which such equipment stores have been decommissioned; (309286)

(2) how many organisations have been using the retail model since his Department's (a) stakeholder events and (b) endorsement of the Transforming Community Equipment and Wheelchairs Services retail model; whether those organisations are using that model for simple aids to daily living alone; and how much has been paid to management consultants for work for those organisations.

The Department does not collect information on the decommissioning of local equipment stores. Decommissioning equipment stores is a decision for local authorities and their health partners to take based on their individual business cases.

For the provision of complex aids, the Department has developed a methodology, tools and materials to assist and support local authorities and their health partners.

Since ministerial endorsement of the wider implementation of the retail model in June 2008, the model is live in seven local authority and health partnerships where prescriptions are being issued for simple equipment. There are also nine local authority and health partners on track to start issuing prescriptions by the end of March 2010 and a further 14 who have contacted the national programme for support to implement the retail model.

The Care Services Efficiency Delivery, on behalf of the London Joint Improvement Partnership, successfully bid to Capital Ambition, the London Regional Improvement and Efficiency Programme, for £1.93 million to accelerate the implementation of the retail model for simple aids across London within two years. The first wave of five sites have started their projects and it takes each locality between nine and 12 months from taking the decision to completing the implementation of the new model for simple aids to daily living. Sites will start to consider their complex equipment solution during months three to nine of their simple aids to daily living project. Currently there are three “clusters” of organisations developing in London, the North West and South West, who wish to work together to design more efficient complex equipment solutions.

The Department does not collect information on how much has been paid to management consultants for work for those organisations.

Continuing Care: Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the cost of continuing healthcare has been in each primary care trust in each of the last three years. (309313)

Information on the cost of providing NHS-funded continuing healthcare in each primary care trust is not collected centrally.

Dental Services: Aluminium

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what assessment has been made of the extent of use of yellow-coloured copper aluminium alloy in place of dental gold in dental treatments; (308145)

(2) how many patients are estimated to have had yellow-coloured copper aluminium alloy fitted instead of dental gold in dental treatment without being informed of the material being used; and if he will make a statement.

Information is not held centrally on which we could base these assessments. The use of this alloy is not permitted in the manufacture of dental appliances prescribed for national health service patients under schedule 3 (a) of the NHS (Dental Charges) Regulations 2005. From April 2008 dentists have been required to provide information on the range of dental appliances they prescribe for NHS patients. If this suggests that there are abuses of the regulations, we will consult the NHS Counter Fraud Service on how to improve compliance.

Departmental Legislation

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what criminal offences have been (a) created and (b) abolished by secondary legislation sponsored by his Department since 1 May 2008. (307798)

The criminal offences created by secondary legislation (a total of four statutory instruments) since 1 May 2008 are as follows:

Regulation 6 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Registration of Regulated Activities) Regulations 2009 (S.I. 2009/660) made it a criminal offence for a person registered as a service provider to contravene or fail to comply with the provisions of regulation 5 of those regulations which set out requirements which a service provider has to meet in relation to the prevention and control of health care associated infections. This came into force on 1 April 2009.

Regulation 25 of the Care Quality Commission (Registration) Regulations 2009 (S.I. 2009/3112) makes it a criminal offence for a person to contravene or fail to comply with the provisions of these regulations which set out requirements which registered persons are required to meet in carrying out regulated activities. This will come into force on 1 April 2010.

The Medical Devices (Amendment) Regulations 2008 (S.I. 2008/2936) implement directive 2007/47/EC on general medical devices and directive 90/385/EEC on active implantable devices. These will come into force on 21 March 2010. They amend the Medical Devices Regulations 2002 (SI 2002/618) by adding additional requirements, each of which is punishable as a criminal offence, if not complied with. For general medical devices:

A new regulation 8(3) of the Active Implantable Medical Devices Regulations 1992 is created, under which where a hazard exists, devices which are also machinery must also meet the essential health and safety requirements set out in annex I to directive 2006/42 to the extent to which those essential health and safety requirements are more specific than the essential requirements to directive 93/42;

Regulation 9 is amended, so that when a custom-made device is supplied to a patient, the health care professional who writes the prescription for the custom-made device must, in relation to each patient that they supply with such a device, (a) ensure that the patient is aware that they may request the statement containing the information required by sections 1 and 2 of annex VIII; and (b) ensure that the statement containing the information required by sections 1 and 2 of annex VIII is made available to the patient on request;

Regulation 14 is amended so that where a device is intended by the manufacturer to be used in conjunction with both the provisions in council directive 89/686/EEC on the approximation or the laws of the member states relating to personal protective equipment and directive 93/42, the relevant basic health and safety requirements of that directive must also be fulfilled;

Regulation 16 is amended, requiring the manufacturer, or their single authorised representative, to (a) notify the Secretary of State of the end of the clinical investigation; and (b) provide justification where premature termination has resulted.

Similar amendments are made to the provisions of the Active Implantable Medical Devices Regulations 1992 which deal with active implantable devices:

Regulation 30 is amended so that the manufacturer of an active implantable device, who under their own name places devices on the market, must provide the Secretary of State with (a) the address of their registered place of business; (b) a description of the devices concerned; and (c) details of the label and instructions for use that accompany each device. Where they do not have a registered place of business in a member state, the manufacturer must (a) designate a single authorised representative; and (b) ensure that the authorised representative has a registered place of business in a member state.

The Medicines for Human Use (Marketing Authorisations Etc.) Amendment Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/3097) amend the Medicines for Human Use (Marketing Authorisation Etc.) Regulations (SI 1994/3144) so as to give effect to Regulation (EC) No. 1901/2006 on medicinal products for paediatric use, which establishes a scheme of obligations and incentives to encourage the development of, and improve access to, medicines for children. These came into force on 29 December 2008. They amend the 1994 regulations by imposing several additional requirements, each of which is punishable as a criminal offence:

An authorisation holder must submit an annual report to the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) as required by article 34(4) of the paediatric regulation;

A new paragraph 6BA is added, so that where the holder of a United Kingdom marketing authorisation has benefited from rewards or incentives under articles 36, 37 or 38 of the paediatric regulation in relation to the product to which the authorisation relates and the periods of protection provided pursuant to those articles have expired, he shall be guilty of an offence if he discontinues the placing of that product on the market without previously, in compliance with article 35 of the paediatric regulation (a) transferring the marketing authorisation of that product to another person who has declared his intention to continue to place that product on the market, or (b) allowing use by such a person of the pharmaceutical, pre-clinical and clinical documentation contained in the file on that product on the basis of article 10c of the directive 2001/83/EC;

A new paragraph 6BB is added, so that where the holder of a United Kingdom marketing authorisation has benefited from rewards or incentives under articles 36, 37 or 38 of the paediatric regulation in relation to the product to which the authorisation relates, and the periods of protection provided pursuant to those articles have expired, he shall be guilty of an offence if he discontinues the placing of that product on the market without informing the EMEA in compliance with article 35 of the paediatric regulation, at least six months before the discontinuation of his intention to discontinue the placing of the product on the market;

A new paragraph 6G is added, so that where any person who (a) is the holder of a United Kingdom marketing authorisation (b) obtains a paediatric indication in respect of the product to which the marketing authorisation relates following completion of an agreed paediatric investigation plan, (c) has marketed that product for other indications prior to obtaining that paediatric indication and (d) fails to place the product on the market taking account of the paediatric indication within two years of the date on which the paediatric indication is authorised as required by article 33 of the paediatric regulation, he shall be guilty of an offence;

A new paragraph 13B(1) is added, so that any person established in the United Kingdom to whom a decision by the EMEA in respect of a paediatric investigation plan is addressed shall be guilty of an offence if the plan relates to a product which does not have a Community marketing authorisation and the person fails to (a) enter into the database referred to in article 11 of the clinical trials directive within a period of six months beginning with the date that the decision was received, the details set out in that article in relation to clinical trials referred to in the paediatric investigation plan and carried out in third countries as required by article 41(1) of the paediatric regulation; or (b) submit the results of those clinical trials to the EMEA within a period of six months beginning with the date that the trial ended as required by article 41(2) of the paediatric regulation;

A new paragraph 13B(2) is added, so that where the holder of a United Kingdom marketing authorisation instigates or conducts a paediatric clinical trial in the United Kingdom in respect of the product to which the authorisation relates and the trial is not included in a paediatric investigation plan, he shall be guilty of an offence if he fails to submit the results of that trial to the EMEA within a period of six months beginning with the date that the trial ended, as required by article 41(2) of the paediatric regulation;

A new paragraph 13B(3) is added, so that where the holder of a United Kingdom marketing authorisation has instigated or conducted a paediatric clinical trial in the United Kingdom which ended on or after 26 January 2007 but before 29 December 2008 in respect of the product to which the authorisation relates and the trial is not included in a paediatric investigation plan, he shall be guilty of an offence if he fails to submit the results of that trial to the EMEA on or before 29 June 2009, as required by article 41(2) of the paediatric regulation;

A new paragraph 13B(4) is added, so that where any person who (a) is the sponsor of a paediatric clinical trial in the United Kingdom in respect of a medicinal product (i) with a United Kingdom marketing authorisation, but where the trial is not instigated by the marketing authorisation holder; or (ii) without a United Kingdom or Community marketing authorisation, where the trial is not included in a paediatric investigation plan; and (b) fails to submit the results of that trial to the EMEA within the period of six months beginning on the date that the trial ended as required by article 41(2) of the paediatric regulation, he shall be guilty of an offence;

A new paragraph 13B(5) is added, so that where any person who (a) has sponsored a paediatric clinical trial in the United Kingdom in respect of a medicinal product (i) with a United Kingdom marketing authorisation, but who is not the marketing authorisation holder; or (ii) without a United Kingdom or Community marketing authorisation, where the trial is not included in a paediatric investigation plan and ended on or after 26 January 2007 but before 29 December 2008; and (b) fails to submit the results of that trial to the EMEA on or before 29 June 2009 as required by article 41(2) of the paediatric regulation, he shall be guilty of an offence;

A new paragraph 13B(6) is added, so that any holder of a United Kingdom marketing authorisation who (a) has knowledge of a paediatric study in respect of the product to which the authorisation relates that ended on or before 25 January 2007; and (b) fails to submit that paediatric study to the licensing authority on or before 29 June 2009 as required by article 45(1) of the paediatric regulation, shall be guilty of an offence;

A new paragraph 13B(7) is added, so that any holder of a United Kingdom marketing authorisation who (a) sponsors a paediatric study in respect of the product to which the authorisation relates; and (b) fails to submit the results to the licensing authority within a period of six months beginning with the date that the trial ended as required by article 46(1) of the paediatric regulation, shall be guilty of an offence;

A new paragraph 13B(8) is added, so that any holder of a United Kingdom marketing authorisation who (a) has sponsored a paediatric study in respect of the product to which the authorisation relates which ended on or after 26 January 2007 but before 29 December 2008; and (b) fails to submit the results to the licensing authority on or before 29 June 2009 as required by article 46(1) of the paediatric regulation, shall be guilty of an offence.

No criminal offences have been abolished by secondary legislation since 1 May 2008.

Diabetes

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what the cost of treating diabetes in children under the age of 16 years was in each of the last five years; (308739)

(2) what the cost of treating diabetes in adults was in each of the last five years.

Estimates of national health service expenditure on diabetes are available from the programme budgeting returns. However, the programme budget returns do not contain age-specific data relating to the treatment of diabetes.

The following table shows the estimated gross level expenditure for diabetes from 2004-08 in England. These figures include primary care trust, Department of Health (DH), strategic health authority and special health authority expenditure. It should be noted that these figures do not include prevention expenditure or general medical services/primary medical services expenditure. This is considerable, but we cannot quantify it separately.

Diabetes expenditure (£)

DH gross expenditure (£)

Diabetes as a proportion of gross expenditure (Percentage)

2004-05

687,402

71,922,179

1.0

2005-06

866,000

80,185,241

1.1

2006-07

1,043,021

84,193,209

1.2

2007-08

1,151,183

93,183,426

1.2

Diabetes: Young People

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) how many 16 to 24-year-olds are being treated for diabetes in (a) England, (b) Leicester and (c) the East Midlands; (308747)

(2) how many 16 to 24-year-olds in (a) England, (b) Leicester and (c) the East Midlands have been diagnosed with (i) type 1 diabetes and (ii) type 2 diabetes.

The data requested are not collected routinely, as participation in the National Diabetes Audit (NDA) is not mandatory. The NDA does not have 100 per cent. coverage or participation and therefore cannot provide the information required.

Data from “Growing Up with Diabetes: children and young people with diabetes in England” reported that in February 2009 there were 4,917 people aged 16 and 17 in England with diabetes and 331 people aged 16 and 17 in the East Midlands Strategic Health Authority (SHA) with diabetes.

Of the 4,917 people aged 16 and 17 in England with diabetes, 4,629 had type 1 diabetes and 288 had type 2 diabetes. In the East Midlands SHA there were 313 people aged 16 and 17 with type 1 diabetes and 18 people aged 16 and 17 with type 2 diabetes.

This survey did not collect data on people aged 18 and over and data are only available by SHA.

Dietary Supplements: EC Law

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if the Food Standards Agency will raise at future meetings with the authorities in Guernsey and Jersey the implementation of the EU (a) Food Supplements Directive and (b) Nutrition and Health Claims Regulation. (309079)

The implementation of the Food Supplements Directive and Nutrition and Health Claims Regulation was last raised with the authorities of Guernsey and Jersey in September 2009. No further meetings are currently planned.

Disabled: Social Security Benefits

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) whether all existing and future claimants of (a) attendance allowance and (b) disability living allowance who are over the age of 65 years will need to agree care plans in order to receive an equivalent level of support; (309116)

(2) whether all (a) existing and (b) future claimants of (i) attendance allowance and (ii) disability living allowance who are over the age of 65 will have the option of continuing to be able to receive their benefit in cash via a direct payment from a future national care service.

If disability benefits for older people are reformed as part of the introduction of the National Care Service, people receiving the affected benefits at the time of reform will continue to receive the same level of cash support. We do not anticipate that these people will need to agree a care plan in order to access this cash support.

As we said in the Green Paper, if we were to draw some disability benefits for older people into the new National Care Service, we would create a new offer for individuals with care needs. This support would be delivered in line with the best principles of benefits; a system that is consistent across the country, flexible methods of payment and investment in prevention.

Health Services: Gloucestershire

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much has been spent on healthcare in the Gloucestershire Primary Care Trust area (a) primary, (b) secondary and (c) other health care categories in each year since 1999. (309138)

The information is not held in the format requested.

Figures on how much has been spent on health care services in the Gloucestershire primary care trust (PCT) area from 2002-03 to 2008-09 are given in the following table. These are the only years for which the information is available by organisation.

Gloucestershire PCT—purchase of health care 2002-03 to 2008-09

£000

Primary health care

Secondary health care

Other health care

2008-09

191,546

589,362

1,188

2007-08

182,552

559,397

625

2006-07

177,393

499,992

2,749

2005-06

164,813

491,882

1,151

2004-05

153,618

451,735

1,023

2003-04

128,961

383,058

610

2002-03

100,199

355,689

473

Notes:

1. The figures represent the total primary, secondary and other health care purchased and provided for the PCT's resident population, with the exception of primary dental and general ophthalmic services since these costs are not directly attributed to PCTs on the basis of a patient's place of residence.

2. ‘Other healthcare’ as defined in the audited summarisation schedules is taken to include expenditure for national health service trust impairments, plus grants to other bodies for health related capital projects under joint working arrangements.

Source:

Audited summarisation schedules 2002-03 to 2008-09

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much (a) Gloucestershire county council and (b) district councils in Gloucestershire were paid by the NHS for joint-funded projects in each year since 1999. (309139)

Health Services: Overseas Visitors

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether EU citizens are entitled to free hospital care and treatment in circumstances where admission to hospital is non-elective as the need for admission and treatment was unforeseen prior to the patient’s entry into the United Kingdom; and if he will make a statement. (309432)

Residents of the European economic area and Switzerland visiting the United Kingdom (UK) are entitled, free of charge, to all necessary national health service hospital treatment.

Under European regulations, where visitors carry a valid European Health Insurance Card the UK can then reclaim the cost of that treatment from the citizen’s home member state.

Health Services: Reciprocal Arrangements

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) how much the NHS (a) was entitled to reclaim and (b) has reclaimed for health care carried out on UK citizens in other countries with which the UK has a reciprocal agreement in the last 12-month period for which figures are available; (308380)

(2) how much has been reclaimed by the NHS for healthcare carried out in England in respect of nationals of other countries with which the UK has a reciprocal agreement in the last 12-month period for which figures are available.

The United Kingdom does not claim reimbursement for UK citizens treated in other countries on the basis of bilateral health care agreements, as the costs are incurred in the country that provided the health care, and not in the UK.

Similarly, countries with which the UK has a bilateral health care agreement do not claim reimbursement from the UK for treatment provided in the UK to their citizens, as the costs are incurred in the UK, and not in the citizen’s home country.

European regulations provide for the UK to reclaim costs from the European economic area and Switzerland for health care provided to their citizens, and vice versa.

Hospital Wards: Greater London

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) mixed-sex and (b) single-sex wards there are in South London Healthcare NHS Trust hospitals. (308503)

The information requested is not collected centrally. Information on the different types of ward may be obtained from the national health service locally.

Ice Skating: Injuries

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people required hospital treatment as a result of ice-skating accidents in (a) Lancashire and (b) each county in the North West in each of the last three years. (308291)

The information is not available in the format requested. Information for hospital admissions involving ice-skates, skis, roller-skates or skateboards by North West Strategic Health Authority (SHA) and primary care trust (PCT) of residence is shown in the following table:

Finished admission episodes1 for fall involving ice-skates, skis, roller-skates or skateboards2 by North West SHA and PCT of residence3, 2006-07 to 2008-09

SHA/PCT of residence description

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

North West SHA

561

642

474

Blackburn with Darwen PCT

18

13

12

Salford PCT

9

22

8

Stockport PCT

32

32

19

Ashton, Leigh and Wigan PCT

27

35

12

Blackpool PCT

14

12

19

Bolton PCT

13

24

19

Warrington PCT

20

17

23

Knowsley PCT

14

9

8

Oldham PCT

28

26

20

Bury PCT

13

11

9

Tameside and Glossop PCT

12

19

16

Cumbria PCT

34

20

27

North Lancashire PCT

31

29

26

Central Lancashire PCT

53

51

33

East Lancashire Teaching PCT

44

51

30

Sefton PCT

23

30

21

Wirral PCT

22

28

25

Liverpool PCT

25

38

22

Halton and St. Helens PCT

19

33

22

Western Cheshire PCT

23

30

11

Central and Eastern Cheshire PCT

33

51

38

Heywood, Middleton and Rochdale PCT

16

11

8

Trafford PCT

21

22

20

Manchester PCT

17

28

26

Notes:

1 Full time equivalent figures are rounded to the nearest whole number.

2 A supplementary code that indicates the nature of any external cause of injury, poisoning or other adverse effects. Only the first external cause code which is coded within the episode is counted in HES. Cause code used: W02—Fall involving ice-skates, skis, roller-skates or skateboards.

3 The SHA or PCT containing the patient’s normal home address. This does not necessarily reflect where the patient was treated as they may have travelled to another SHA/PCT for treatment.

Source:

The NHS information centre for health and social care.

Multiple Sclerosis

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what recent estimate his Department has made of the number of people with multiple sclerosis. (308378)

The National Service Framework for long-term neurological conditions, published in 2005, estimated there were between 52-62,000 people in the United Kingdom with this condition.

Multiple Sclerosis: Nurses

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many nurses specialise in caring for people with multiple sclerosis. (308379)

NHS: Internet

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many websites have the suffix nhs.uk in their web address. (307941)

As at 15 December 2009, there were 6,004 live United Kingdom websites with the nhs.uk suffix. 3,985 of these were live records within the English national health service web estate. The remainder have been allocated by the devolved Administrations.

These numbers are constantly changing as new websites are created and old websites decommissioned.

Nottingham Hospital: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) doctors and (b) nurses were employed at Nottingham City Hospital in (i) 1997 and (ii) 2009. (308496)

The information is not available in the format requested. However, data for the Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust are set out in the following table.

NHS hospital and community health services: qualified nursing staff and medical and dental staff within specified organisations 1997 to 2008

Headcount

As at 30 September each year

1997

2008

Qualified Nursing staff

3,099

3,770

Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust

1,442

n/a

Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University NHS Trust

1,657

n/a

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

3,770

Medical and Dental staff

967

1,371

Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust

371

n/a

Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University NHS Trust

596

n/a

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

1,371

n/a = Not applicable.

Note:

In 2006 Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust merged with Queens Medical Centre Nottingham University NHS Trust to become Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust. Therefore data have been provided for Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust in 2008 and its component parts in 1997.

Data Quality

Workforce statistics are compiled from data sent by more than 300 NHS trusts and primary care trusts in England. The Information Centre for health and social care liaises closely with these organisations to encourage submission of complete and valid data and seeks to minimise inaccuracies and the effect of missing and invalid data. Processing methods and procedures are continually being updated to improve data quality. Where this happens any impact on figures already published will be assessed but unless this is significant at national level they will not be changed. Where there is impact only at detailed or local level this will be footnoted in relevant analyses.

Source:

Medical and Dental Workforce Census, The Information Centre for health and social care

Offenders

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many employees of his Department and its agencies have been convicted of a criminal offence of each type in each year since 1997. (308515)

The Department has no central records of any members of staff of the core Department who have been convicted of a criminal offence while a serving civil servant since 1997.

Where such reports as these involve less than five cases, the Department follows Cabinet Office guidelines and does not publicly report specific figures on the grounds of confidentiality. With such small numbers the individuals concerned might be personally identified with possible legal consequences. A number of such cases have occurred in the Department’s agencies but the total number of those cases are less than five.

Social Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether he plans to limit the entitlement available to those in receipt of (a) attendance allowance and (b) disability living allowance under proposals for reform of the social care system. (308782)

If disability benefits for older people are reformed as part of the National Care Service, those receiving the affected benefits at the time of reform would continue to receive the same level of cash support. We will give more details about the National Care Service offer in our White Paper later this year.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 14 December 2009, Official Report, column 762W, on social services, if he will publish the elements of the micro-simulation model which provided the figures on the number of individuals whose needs are critical. (309124)

I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave to him on 10 December 2009, Official Report, column 552W.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 10 December 2009, Official Report, columns 553-4W, on social services, in what month those discussions and clearances took place. (309125)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 9 December 2009, Official Report, column 495W, on social services, what methodology was used to calculate the (a) residential and (b) informal care switchers. (309126)

I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave him on 14 December 2009, Official Report, column 763W.

Social Services: Reform

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) whether the implementation of his plans for the NHS in respect of social care provision will require legislation; (309288)

(2) whether social care provision commissioned by primary care trusts will be exempt from means-testing;

(3) what powers he plans to provide for NHS commissioners to commission social care;

(4) what uplift he expects each primary care trust to receive consequent on the takeover of social care provision by primary care trusts;

(5) what plans he has to transfer (a) control over provision and (b) responsibility for funding of social care to primary care trusts;

(6) what plans he has for the future role of the NHS in respect of control over provision of social care; and if he will make a statement.

Both “NHS 2010-15; good to great”, a copy of which has already been placed in the Library, and “The NHS operating framework for England for 2010/11” emphasised the importance of the NHS working together with its partners to deliver joined-up services around people's needs and support people to stay healthy and independent. Neither document suggested structural changes to accountability or governance.

A copy of the framework has been placed in the Library.

Surgery: Greater London

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people in the London borough of (a) Bexley, (b) Bromley and (c) Greenwich underwent elective surgery in the last three years for which figures are available. (308502)

Information is not collected in the format requested. However, the following table shows the number of finished consultant episodes (FCEs) in which an elective procedure or intervention, including but not limited to elective surgery, was performed. A finished consultant episode is a continuous period of admitted patient care under one consultant within one health care provider. Figures do not represent the number of different patients, since one patient may have more than one episode of care within the same stay at hospital, or in different stays within the same year.

Count of finished consultant episodes where a main elective procedure or intervention was performed at Bexley, Bromley and Greenwich Primary Care Trust of responsibility from 2006-07 to 2008-09

FCEs where an elective procedure or intervention was performed

Bexley PCT

Bromley PCT

Greenwich PCT

2008-09

25,073

45,177

26,982

2007-08

23,585

38,565

26,170

2006-07

23,824

34,937

25,565

Notes:

1. Commissioning responsibility for individual patients rests with the primary care trust (PCT) with whom the patient is registered. This means that patients with a general practitioner (GP) in one PCT area may reside in a neighbouring or other area but remain the responsibility of the PCT with whom their GP of registration is associated. PCTs are also responsible for non-registered patients who are resident within their boundaries.

2. A main elective procedure or intervention is the first recorded procedure or intervention in each episode, usually the most resource intensive procedure or intervention performed during the episode.

Source:

Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), The NHS Information Centre for health and social care

Surgery: Nottingham

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many surgical operations were carried out on the NHS in Nottingham North constituency in (a) 1997 and (b) 2008. (308495)

This information is not available in the format requested. Data on finished consultant episodes1 (FCEs) are collected by primary care trust (PCT) of responsibility2, the commissioning PCT, not by constituency.

The number of FCEs where there was a main procedure3 with Nottingham City as the PCT of responsibility in 2008-08 and 1997-98 is shown in the following table. This includes activity in national health service hospitals in England and English NHS commissioned activity in the independent sector.

1 An FCE is a continuous period of admitted patient care under one consultant within one health care provider. FCEs are counted against the year in which they end. Figures do not represent the number of different patients, as a person may have more than one episode of care within the same stay in hospital or in different stays in the same year.

2 PCT of responsibility—this is a derived field providing the PCT responsible for the patient. The commissioning responsibility for individual patients rests with the PCT with whom the patient is registered. Therefore, this is based on the postcode of the patient’s general practitioner (GP). This means that patients with a GP in one PCT area may reside in a neighbouring or other area but remain the responsibility of the PCT with whom their GP of registration is associated. PCTs are also responsible for non-registered patients who are resident within their boundaries.

3 Main procedure—the first recorded procedure or intervention in each episode (Operating Procedure Code Supplement codes AOO to X97), usually the most resource intensive procedure or intervention performed during the episode. It is appropriate to use main procedure when looking at admission details, (e.g. time waited), but a more complete count of episodes with a particular procedure is obtained by looking at the main and the secondary procedures.

Finished consultant episodes

2008-09

46,357

1997-98

39,152

Source:

Hospital Episode Statistics, The Information Centre for health and social care

Surgery: Obesity

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many surgical procedures to treat obesity were carried out on the NHS in (a) England, (b) each region and (c) each strategic health authority area in each year since 1997. (308091)

Data on finished consultant episodes with a primary diagnosis of obesity as well as a main or secondary procedure of bariatric surgery for England and each health authority or regional area are provided in the following table. Data are available for each year from 1997-98 to 2008-09.

The NHS Information Centre has provided slightly revised data to those previously provided for the years 1997-98 to 2006-07 following a revision of the definition of bariatric surgery.

Count of Finished Consultant Episodes1 with a primary diagnosis2 of obesity4 and a main or secondary procedure3 of bariatric surgery4 broken down by SHA of residence5 for 1997-98 to 2008-09—Activity in English national health service hospitals and English NHS commissioned activity in the independent sectorStrategic health authority (SHA)2008-092007-082006-072005-062004-052003-042002-032001-022000-011999-20001998-991997-98England total4,2212,6951,9341,032736469340280257196196148Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire SHAQ01———402512967246Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire SHAQ02———28189687232Essex SHAQ03———12137535411North West London SHAQ04———6946111357311North Central London SHAQ05———2916125235—2North East London SHAQ06———2410431212—South East London SHAQ07———3227181113181143South West London SHAQ08———3322111158724Northumberland, Tyne and Wear SHAQ09———583323119881010County Durham and Tees Valley SHAQ10———21157576342North and East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire SHAQ11———13663372019815124West Yorkshire SHAQ12———595165403856423130Cumbria and Lancashire SHAQ13———131817111491477Greater Manchester SHAQ14———202115949576Cheshire and Merseyside SHAQ15———833324136247188Thames Valley SHAQ16———13969674——Hampshire and Isle of Wight SHAQ17———243—1—342Kent and Medway SHAQ18———12185594333Surrey and Sussex SHAQ19———3321161313975—Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire SHAQ20———57191213—334South West Peninsula SHAQ21———332213122471265Dorset and Somerset SHAQ22———3113431422—South Yorkshire SHAQ23———1078863432422151723Trent SHAQ24———8542202214146710Leicestershire, Northamptonshire and Rutland SHAQ25———193311824—53Shropshire and Staffordshire SHAQ26———23211811333113Birmingham and the Black Country SHAQ27———25201210737257West Midlands South SHAQ28———9156323222North East SHAQ30268217132—————————North West SHAQ313167577————————— Yorkshire and the Humber SHAQ32584491439—————————East Midlands SHAQ33550279205—————————West Midlands SHAQ34445345244—————————East of England SHAQ3524311787—————————London SHAQ36909582299—————————South East Coast SHAQ37446281139—————————South Central SHAQ38157127110—————————South West SHAQ39302181202—————————England—Not otherwise specifiedU100100010000Other, foreign and unknown SHAs522412624291210961071 Finished Consultant Episode (FCE)A FCE is a continuous period of admitted patient care under one consultant within one healthcare provider. FCEs are counted against the year in which they end. Figures do not represent the number of different patients, as a person may have more than one episode of care within the same stay in hospital or in different stays in the same year.2 Primary diagnosisThe primary diagnosis is the first of up to 20 (14 from 2002-03 to 2006-07 and seven prior to 2002-03) diagnosis fields in the HES data set and provides the main reason why the patient was admitted to hospital. 3 Number of episodes with a (named) main or secondary procedure The number of episodes where the procedure (or intervention) was recorded in any of the 24 (12 from 2002-03 to 2006-07 and four prior to 2002-03) procedure fields in a HES record. A record is only included once in each count, even if the procedure is recorded in more than one procedure field of the record. Note that more procedures are carried out than episodes with a main or secondary procedure. For example, patients under going a ‘cataract operation’ would tend to have at least two procedures—removal of the faulty lens and the fitting of a new one—counted in a single episode.4 Obesity and Bariatric Surgery CodesObesity: ICD-10 code used for obesity was E66.Bariatric Surgery Procedure Codes:Recent guidance from the standards and classification team at Connecting for Health has led to a revision of the definition for ‘Bariatric Surgery’. Due to these changes revised data has been provided. (See: OPCS-4 explanatory notes for more details on the bariatric surgery procedure codes)The OPCS-4 procedure codes below are used to denote bariatric surgery.The OPCS-4 procedure codes (1996-97 to 2005-06, and 2006-07 to 2008-09) are: G28.1, G28.2, G28.3, G28.8, G28.9, G30.1, G30.2, G30.8, G30.9, G31.1, G31.2, G31.3, G31.4, G31.8, G31.9, G31.0, G32.1, G32.2, G32.3, G32.8, G32.9, G32.0, G33.1, G33.2, G33.3, G33.8, G33.9, G33.0, G38.8, G48.1, G48.2. The following additional four digit OPCS-4 codes have been added due to the use of OPCS-4.3 in 2006-07 data:G28.4, G28.5, G30.3, G30.4, G31.5, G31.6, G32.4, G32.5, G33.5, G33.6, G38.7, G71.6Additional OPCS-4.4 codes used for the 2007-08 and 2008-09 data are: G27.1, G27.2, G27.3, G27.4, G27.5,G27.8 and G27.9.5 SHA/primary care trust (PCT) of residenceThe SHA or PCT containing the patient’s normal home address. This does not necessarily reflect where the patient was treated as they may have travelled to another SHA/PCT for treatment. PCT/SHA data qualityIn July 2006, the NHS reorganised SHA and PCT in England from 28 SHAs into 10, and from 303 PCTs into 152. As a result data from 2006-07 onwards are not directly comparable with previous years. Data have been presented for those SHA/PCTs which have valid data for the breakdown presented here. As a result some SHA/PCTs may be missing from the list provided.Assessing growth through timeHES figures are available from 1989-90 onwards. Changes to the figures over time need to be interpreted in the context of improvements in data quality and coverage (particularly in earlier years), improvements in coverage of independent sector activity (particularly from 2006-07) and changes in NHS practice. For example, apparent reductions in activity may be due to a number of procedures which may now be undertaken in outpatient settings and so no longer include in admitted patient HES data.Strategic Health Authority ConfigurationIn 2006-07 there was a SHA configuration change, where 28 SHAs merged into 10. For this reason, 2006-07 is based on the new configuration.Bariatric Surgery Procedure Codes:The OPCS-4 procedure codes below are used to denote bariatric surgery.The OPCS-4 procedure codes (1996-97 to 2005-06, and 2006-07 to 2008-09) are:G28.1 Partial gastrectomy and anastomosis of stomach to duodenumG28.2 Partial gastrectomy and anastomosis of stomach to transposed jejunumG28.3 Partial gastrectomy and anastomosis of stomach jejunum necG28.8 Other specific partial excision of stomachG28.9 Unspecified partial excision of stomachG30.1 Gastroplasty necG30.2 Partitioning of stomach necG30.8 Other specified plastic operations on stomachG30.9 Unspecified plastic operations on stomachG31.1 Bypass of stomach by anastomosis of oesophagus to duodenumG31.2 Bypass of stomach by anastomosis of stomach to duodenumG31.3 Revision of anastomosis of stomach to duodenumG31.4 Conversion to anastomosis of stomach to duodenumG31.8 Other specified connection of stomach to duodenumG31.9 Unspecified connection of stomach to duodenumG31.0 Conversion from previous anastomosis of stomach to duodenumG32.1 Bypass of stomach by anastomosis of stomach to transposed jejunumG32.2 Revision of anastomosis of stomach to transposed jejunumG32.3 Conversion to anastomosis of stomach to transposed jejunumG32.8 Other specified connection of stomach to transposed jejunumG32.9 Unspecified connection of stomach to transposed jejunumG32.0 Conversion from previous anastomosis of stomach to transposed jejunumG33.1 Bypass of stomach by anastomosis of stomach to jejunum necG33.2 Revision of anastomosis of stomach to jejunum necG33.3 Conversion of anastomosis of stomach to jejunum nec G33.8 Other specified other connection of stomach to jejunumG33.9 Unspecified other connection of stomach to jejunumG33.0 Conversion from previous anastomosis of stomach to jejunum necG38.8 Other specified other open operations on stomachG48.1 Insertion of gastric bubbleG48.2 Attention to gastric bubbleThe following additional four digit OPCS-4 codes have been added due to the use of OPCS-4.3 in 2006-07 data:G28.4 Sleeve gastrectomy and duodenal switchG28.5 Sleeve gastrectomy necG30.3 Partitioning of stomach using bandG30.4 Partitioning of stomach using staplesG31.5 Closure of connection of stomach and duodenumG31.6 Attention to connection of stomach and duodenumG32.4 Closure of connection of stomach to transposed jejunumG32.5 Attention to connection of stomach to transposed jejunumG33.5 Closure of connection of stomach to jejunum necG33.6 Attention to connection of stomach to jejunumG38.7 Removal of gastric bandG71.6 Duodenal switchAdditional OPCS-4.4 codes used for the 2007-08 and 2008-09 data are:G27.1 Total gastrectomy and excision of surrounding tissueG27.2 Total gastrectomy and anastomosis of oesophagus to duodenumG27.3 Total gastrectomy and interposition of jejunumG27.4 Total gastrectomy and anastomosis of oesophagus to transposed jejunumG27.5 Total gastrectomy and anastomosis of oesophagus to jejunum necG27.8 Other specified total excision of stomachG27.9 Unspecified total excision of stomachSource:Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), The NHS Information Centre for health and social care

Energy and Climate Change

Fuel Poverty

14. To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change how many households were in fuel poverty in (a) the UK and (b) Billericay constituency in (i) 2003 and (ii) 2009. (308904)

The estimated number of households in fuel poverty in the UK was around 2 million in 2003. The latest year for which figures are available is for 2007 and this shows that there were around 4 million fuel- poor households in the UK.

The most recently available sub-regional split of fuel poverty relates to 2006, and shows that there were around 2,600 fuel-poor households in the Billericay constituency. In 2003 there were around 2,400 fuel-poor households in the Billericay constituency.

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what steps he plans to take to reduce the level of fuel poverty among households not on the gas main. (308909)

We are aware of the challenges that exist for households off the gas main. To help address this:

Ofgem has incentivised large gas networks to provide connections to deprived households off the network;

CERT provides incentives for energy suppliers to promote heat pumps in off-gas-grid vulnerable properties;

Warm Front in England is piloting air source heat pumps, and

The forthcoming Renewable Heat Incentive has the potential to benefit off-gas-grid consumers.

Fuel Poverty: Older People

15. To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what steps he is taking to reduce fuel poverty among older people. (308905)

The Government have a strong package of measures to help reduce fuel poverty among vulnerable households which includes the elderly. This is centred on tackling the three root causes of fuel poverty:

Reducing the demand for energy by improving home energy efficiency through schemes such as Warm Front and equivalents in the devolved Administrations, CERT, CESP and Decent Homes;

Ensuring competitive energy prices through a robust system of regulation aimed to protect all consumers; and

Raising real incomes, including winter fuel and cold weather payments alongside the wider tax and benefit system and through benefit entitlement checks. We have introduced legislation to implement mandated social price support schemes once the current voluntary agreement with suppliers comes to an end and have said that we are minded to focus the majority of the additional resources on older pensioner households on the lowest incomes.

Climate Change: Scientific Evidence

16. To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what recent assessment he has made of the scientific evidence relating to climate change. (308907)

DECC includes a dedicated team of climate specialists who keep the scientific evidence under review. The AVOID research programme on avoiding dangerous climate change recently assessed the scientific research published since the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Fourth Assessment Report. The findings informed the UK delegation ahead of Copenhagen. Expert advice is also obtained from the UK and wider academic research community and through the Integrated Climate Programme at the Met Office Hadley Centre.

Climate Change: Copenhagen

17. To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what assessment he has made of the outcome of the Copenhagen climate change conference; and if he will make a statement. (308908)

The Accord agreed in Copenhagen marks the start of a new phase in tackling climate change. Major developed and developing countries committed to further action, including reaching agreement on the need to limit global warming to 2 degrees. The UK will now work to convert the measures agreed at Copenhagen into a comprehensive legally binding agreement.

Biofuels

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what progress his Department has made in defining its biomass sustainability criteria. (308252)

[holding answer 6 January 2010]: The Government’s approach to defining sustainability criteria for biomass is set out in the UK Renewable Energy Strategy, launched in July.

We are awaiting the European Commission’s report on the requirement for a sustainability scheme for solid and gaseous biomass used for heat and electricity, which was due by 31 December 2009. This report will be accompanied, where appropriate, with proposals to the European Parliament and Council.

We will then consider this report and its implications for introducing sustainability criteria for the biomass used for heat and electricity in the UK.

Boilers

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change whether the boiler scrappage scheme applies to boilers operating on liquefied petroleum gas. (308251)

[holding answer 6 January 2010]: Liquefied petroleum gas boilers are eligible for this scheme if they meet the criteria on age and efficiency.

BP: Canvey Island

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what assessment he has made of the effects on the use of the local road network of BP's contract to lease the Oikos terminal on Canvey Island; and if he will make a statement. (306318)

I have been asked to reply:

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has made no assessment of the effects on the use of the local road network of BP Oil UK Ltd.’s contract to lease storage facilities at Oikos Storage Ltd.’s site on Canvey Island.

Oikos will remain the operator of this site for the purposes of the Control of Major Accident Hazards Regulations 1999 (COMAH) and will have overall responsibility for safety throughout the duration of the BP contract. HSE's role is to monitor safety at the site. HSE will continue to do this and will assess any significant changes that Oikos make to the site and to the site's COMAH safety report as a result of the implementation of the BP contract. As part of their responsibilities under COMAH, Oikos are expected to identify and assess hazards and risks associated with the transport of hazardous substances that could lead to major accidents at the site.

HSE understands that hazardous materials will be transferred to and from the Oikos site though underground pipelines throughout the duration of the BP contract. The safety of any hazardous materials transported by road in, for example, road tankers, would be covered by the Carriage of Dangerous Goods and Use of Transportable Pressure Regulations 2009 enforced by the police and the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA).

Carbon Sequestration

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what steps his Department is taking to encourage the further development of carbon capture and storage technology; and if he will make a statement. (308902)

We have announced support for what is expected to be one of the world's first commercial-scale demonstrations of CCS on a coal-fired power station, and recently confirmed our intention to support a total of four demonstration projects.

We have supported extensive research to help understand the potential of CCS internationally and domestically. We have created one of the world's first legal frameworks to allow the safe storage of carbon dioxide and address the problem of long-term liability associated with storage sites.

Climate Change: British Overseas Territories

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change if he will make an assessment of the effects on the British Overseas Territories of decisions reached at the Copenhagen climate change conference. (309088)

I refer the hon. Member to the oral statement made by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change regarding the Copenhagen climate summit outcomes on 5 January 2010, Official Report, column 42. As the statement suggested, we are continuing to reflect on the implications of the outcome of COP15 for the UK and for the Overseas Territories and are liaising with them directly over that.

Climate Change: International Cooperation

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change if he will place in the Library a copy of each document he presented to the recent United Nations climate change conference in Copenhagen; and if he will make a statement. (308184)

The UK negotiates as part of the EU and therefore all formal submissions we have made to the UNFCCC have been as part of the EU. The EU made one submission during the Copenhagen climate change conference—the EU presented its fifth national communication under the UNFCCC on 7 December. A copy is available in the Library of the House. I refer the hon. Member to the Secretary of State’s statement of 5 January 2010, Official Report, column 42, on the outcomes of the Copenhagen climate change conference.

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change how many (a) Ministers and (b) officials of his Department attended the Copenhagen climate change conference; and at what cost to the public purse. (309178)

Two Ministers and 36 officials from the Department of Energy and Climate Change attended the Copenhagen climate change conference as part of the UK delegation. The total cost to the UK taxpayer is not yet known, but current estimates suggest a rough costing of £350,000. This includes expenses for non-DECC members of the UK delegation which are covered from DECC's budgets, such as office space and land transportation.

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what assessment he has made of the outcomes of the Copenhagen climate change conference. (309314)

I refer the hon. Member to the oral statement made by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change on 5 January 2010, Official Report, column 42, regarding the Copenhagen climate conference outcomes.

Departmental Disclosure of Information

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change how many allegations of victimisation for whistleblowing have been made to his Department by its staff since 6 June 2006. (301498)

There have been no known allegations of victimisation for whistleblowing reported by departmental staff since the inception of DECC on 3 October 2008.

Departmental Legislation

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what criminal offences have been (a) created and (b) abolished by secondary legislation sponsored by his Department since 1 October 2008. (307801)

The offences we have identified include:

The Transfrontier shipments of radioactive waste and spent fuel regulations 2008 (SI 2008/3087)

The Transfrontier shipments of radioactive waste and spent fuel regulations 2008 (SI 2008/3087) continue to implement council directive 96/29/Euratom laying down basic standards for the protection of the health of workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionizing radiation, and implement directive 2006/117/Euratom on the supervision and control of shipments of radioactive waste and spent fuel. The regulations create several offences relating to the transfrontier shipment of radioactive waste or spent fuel without an authorisation granted by the Environment Agency (in England and Wales), the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (in Scotland) or the chief inspector appointed under the Radioactive Substances Act 1993 (in Northern Ireland).

Regulation 4(1) creates an offence of shipping radioactive waste or spent fuel to a destination outside the United Kingdom, or into the United Kingdom from a third country (except by way of transit), except in accordance with an authorisation. Regulation 4(2) creates an offence of shipping radioactive waste or spent fuel into the United Kingdom from another European member state except under the authority of an authorisation granted by that member state.

Regulation 5(1) creates an offence of shipping radioactive waste or spent fuel into the United Kingdom from a third country by way of transit to another member state except in accordance with an authorisation granted by the member state of destination.

Regulation 5(2) creates an offence of shipping radioactive waste or spent fuel into the United Kingdom from a third country for transit to another third country except in accordance with an authorisation by the UK authorities, or where relevant by the other member state.

Regulation 8(2) creates an offence of failing to notify the authorities within 15 days that a consignment of radioactive waste or spent fuel from outside the UK has been received.

Regulation 9(4) creates an offence of failing to notify the authorities that radioactive waste or spent fuel consigned from the UK to a different country has arrived, within 15 days of that arrival.

Regulation 10(2) creates an offence of failing to ensure that a shipment of radioactive waste or spent fuel is accompanied by the correct documents.

Regulation 11(2) creates an offence of making a false or misleading statement in an application under the regulations for authorisation in relation to shipping radioactive waste or spent fuel.

Regulation 14(3) creates an offence of failure to comply with an instruction of the authorities to return a consignment of radioactive waste or spent fuel to the country of origin, or to otherwise dispose of it.

Regulation 14(4)(b) creates an offence of failing to comply with a notice requiring the holder of an authorisation to take back any radioactive waste or spent fuel that has been sent out of the United Kingdom.

Regulation 15(2) creates an offence of failing to comply with a notice sent by the authorities requiring that information is sent or that actions are taken or are not taken in relation to the shipment of radioactive waste or spent fuel.

The regulations also revoke the “Transfrontier Shipment of Radioactive Waste Regulations 1993 (SI 1993/3031)” which contained in regulation 18 a set of offences which were similar in nature to the above new offences (although they did not apply to spent fuel).

Criminal Jurisdiction (Application to Offshore Energy Installation etc) Order 2009

Although not creating any new criminal offences, this order extends the existing criminal law regime in England and Wales and Scotland for acts or omissions that take place on and around a renewable energy installation in the UK’s renewable energy zone.

Departmental Pay

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change how much has been paid in bonuses to civil servants in his Department in 2009. (306429)

An element of the Department of Energy and Climate Change’s overall pay award is allocated to non-consolidated variable pay related to performance. These payments are used to drive high performance and form part of the pay award for members of staff who demonstrate exceptional performance, for example by exceeding targets set or meeting challenging objectives.

Non-consolidated variable pay awards are funded from within existing pay bill controls, and have to be re-earned each year against pre-determined targets and, as such, do not add to future pay bill costs.

The total amount of non-consolidated variable pay paid to civil servants in DECC from January to August 2009 inclusive (the latest figures available) is £484,000.

Departmental Training

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change how much his Department and its agencies spent on away days in the last 12 months; and what the (i) subject and (ii) location of each away day was. (306756)

The information requested is not available centrally and could be made available only at disproportional cost.

Natural Gas

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change for what reasons the oxygen specification threshold of natural gas was set at 0.2 per cent.; and whether his Department has made an estimate of the effect on the level of use of natural gas of raising that threshold to three per cent. (305182)

[holding answer 8 December 2009]: This limit is set in the Gas Safety (Management) Regulations 1996 (SI 1996 No. 551), at schedule 3/part 1. Those regulations were made, by the then Department of the Environment, on the advice of the HSE. Subsequently the then Department for Business and Regulatory Reform consulted on future arrangements for Great Britain’s gas quality specifications, and concluded that there was not a case for seeking change to the GS(M)R. Gas quality, and the process for seeking flexibility under the current statutory arrangements, is again discussed in a document just published by my Department, entitled “Biomethane into the Gas Network: A Guide for Producers”; this is available at:

http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/what_we_do/uk_supply/markets/gas_markets/nonconvention/nonconvention.aspx

Natural Gas: Storage

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what additional volume of gas storage capacity he expects to be available in the UK by 2012. (308903)

National Grid's "Ten Year Statement 2009" (published in December) shows 0.53 bcm of storage capacity under construction, and expected to commission by 2011-12.

Renewable Energy

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what steps he plans to take to ensure that local communities benefit directly from local renewable energy generation. (308888)

The Government are developing and demonstrating successful models of community engagement through the ‘Low Carbon Communities Challenge’; phase 1 winners were announced on 21 December. We are also setting effective financial subsidy levels through feed-in tariffs and the renewable heat incentive to benefit communities.

Renewable Energy: Heating

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what progress his Department is making in the establishment of an incentive mechanism for the development of renewable heat technologies. (308898)

We are currently working on the development of the renewable heat incentive scheme which will provide financial incentives to encourage renewable heat generation at all scales. We plan to publish our consultation on the scheme shortly. Details of how the scheme will operate will be set out in the consultation.

Sellafield: Waste Management

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what recent representations he has received on policy on disposal of nuclear waste from Sellafield. (308906)

The Department has regular contact with the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA), its nuclear sites and other interested stakeholders. Government recognise the importance of managing radioactive waste to the highest environmental, security and safety standards and work closely with the NDA to ensure that this is done achieving best value for money consistent with those standards.

Warm Front Scheme: East Sussex

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change how many households in (a) Lewes constituency and (b) East Sussex county council area received assistance under the Warm Front programme in 2008-09. (308457)

In 2008-09, 322 households in Lewes constituency and 2,921 in East Sussex county council area received assistance from the Warm Front scheme.

Warm Front Scheme: Stroud

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change how much has been spent on the Warm Front programme in Stroud district in each year since its inception; and what other measures the Government have taken in Stroud district to (a) encourage greater energy efficiency measures and (b) reduce the level of fuel poverty. (309141)

The following table details the amount spent by the Warm Front scheme each year in Stroud since June 2005.

Warm Front spend

£

2005-06

180,242

2006-07

325,327

2007-08

347,282

2008-09

471,998

2009-101

617,018

1 Up to 30 November 2009.

The Government have a strong package of national programmes aimed at encouraging greater energy efficiency measures and reducing the level of fuel poverty. The combination of Warm Front, the Carbon Emissions Reduction Target (CERT), Community Energy Savings Programme (CESP), Decent Homes and local programmes delivered through local government, partnerships, energy suppliers, Eaga and National Energy Action (such as Warm Zones and the Community Energy Efficiency Fund) are all important in tackling fuel poverty and encouraging greater energy efficiency across England.

In December 2009, my Department announced the launch of the Home Energy Pay As You Save (PAYS) pilots. Stroud district council in partnership with Severn Wye Energy Agency will deliver a PAYS pilot project to householders within the Stroud area. The PAYS pilot will give households the opportunity to invest in energy efficiency and microgeneration technologies in their homes with no up-front cost. Householders will make repayments spread over a long enough period so that repayments are lower than their predicted energy bill savings, meaning financial and carbon savings are made from day one.

Wind Power

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what percentage of the United Kingdom's energy needs are generated by wind power; and how many wind turbines are operating in the UK. (309075)

In 2008 1.8 per cent. of UK electricity generation was from wind power1. Provisional figures for the first three quarters of 2009 indicate that in this period 2.2 per cent. of electricity generated in the UK was from wind2.

The following table sets out the number of operational wind turbines in the UK as at November 2009. In addition, it is estimated that there are approximately 12,000 micro-wind turbines in the UK.

1Source:

Table 5.6 Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics (DUKES) 2009

(http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/statistics/publications/dukes/dukes.aspx).

2Source:

Table 5.1 Energy Trends

(http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/statistics/source/electricity/electricity.aspx).

Onshore

Offshore

Total

Greater than 50kW

2,617

1207

2,824

Less than 50kW

225

n/a

225

Total

2,842

207

3,049

1Does not include the Beatrice offshore wind demonstrator project which is outside UK territorial waters. Source: AEA Technology.

Wind Power: Noise

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change on what advice the maximum permitted night-time noise from onshore wind turbines was set at 43 decibels; when this limit was last reviewed; and why the recommendation in the 2006 draft report by Hayes McKenzie Partnership of a reduction in the sound level was rejected. (309012)

[holding answer 6 January 2010]: The 43 decibel night-time limit in the ETSU-R-97 guidance is derived from the 35 dB(A) sleep disturbance criteria referred to in Planning Policy Guidance 24 (Planning and Noise). An addition of 10 dB(A) was made to the 35 dB(A) figure to allow for attenuation through an open window, and 2 dB subtracted to account for the use of LA90 rather than LAeq. ETSU-R-97 has not been formally reviewed, but other aspects of wind turbine noise have been subject to a number of studies including the 2006 research by Hayes McKenzie.

In relation to the Hayes McKenzie research, I understand that the reference to the decibel levels was not included in the final report because the consultants decided that referring to a specific level (as in the first draft of the report) did not reflect the terms of reference of the study.

Written Questions: Government Responses

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change when he will respond to Question 301323, tabled by the hon. Member for South West Bedfordshire on 19 November 2009, on departmental working practices. (305879)

[holding answer 10 December 2009]: I responded to the hon. Member on 16 December 2009, Official Report, column 1334W.