Written Answers to Questions
Thursday 7 January 2010
Prime Minister
Departmental Conferences
I refer the hon. Member to the answer given by my right hon. Friend the Minister of State for the Cabinet Office on 16 December 2009, Official Report, column 1253W.
Departmental Written Questions
My office aims to answer all ordinary written parliamentary questions within five working days, and named day written parliamentary questions on the day named.
In the parliamentary session 2008-09 87 per cent. of named day questions were answered on the day named.
Iraq Committee of Inquiry
I will continue to take forward the Government's policy in Iraq. As to the inquiry, it continues to sit and will hear evidence and then make its report.
Members: Surveillance
I have nothing further to add to the answer I gave on 21 July 2009, Official Report, column 1166W.
Official Gifts
(2) what official gifts he and his predecessor have received from the President of Afghanistan in each year since 2001.
The Government have published annual lists of gifts received and given by Ministers in an official capacity valued at more than £140 since 2001. Copies of the lists are available in the Libraries of the House. Information for the current financial year will be published in the usual way.
House of Commons Commission
Disabled People
The House provides considerable support for Members with disabilities to help them to carry out their duties. Support and advice are provided by the Department of Resources, the Department of Facilities and the Parliamentary ICT Service. This support includes medical appraisals and help from the Consultant Occupational Health Physician, the provision of a variety of equipment (i.e. specialised IT software and equipment, motorised wheelchairs etc.), accommodation adjustments, and funding for transport needs and additional staff help where necessary. A leaflet is in preparation setting out the help that is available to Members with disabilities after the next general election.
The Commission’s duties under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 are duties owed as an employer rather than duties owed to holders of elected office.
Defence
Afghanistan: Reconstruction
I have been asked to reply.
The Kajaki dam is operational and producing around 33 MW of power, benefiting at least 200,000 people.
Armed Forces: Training
(2) what aspects of Army training his Department plans to reduce.
Given our current commitments, we must ensure that our core activity is focused on preparing our soldiers for the Department’s main effort, success on operations in Afghanistan. Combined with the pressures that the Defence budget has faced, this means prioritising our resources to these critical activities, and reductions in some non-operational specific training. Our training, and associated equipment fleets, are being managed to this effect.
We are working through detailed implementation. But no training for current deployments will be cut. An example where we could expect reductions, however, is in the levels of training provided for heavy armour, such as Challenger 2 tanks which have not been deployed in Afghanistan.
Departmental Billing
Information currently available for the Department, its agencies and trading funds is provided in the following table:
Total Percentage paid Total Percentage paid Total Percentage paid Total Percentage paid Total Percentage paid November 2008 390,354 72.3 — — — — — — — — December 2008 415,608 85.0 — — — — — — — — January 2009 361,494 80.0 — — 1,267 55.5 — — — — February 2009 459246 85.0 — — 1,010 82.5 — — — — March 2009 466,246 90.7 740 94.7 1,271 86.2 — — — — April 2009 472,644 92.8 551 97.6 1,090 81.3 — — — — May 2009 445,844 98.4 572 98.1 922 77.5 — — — — June 2009 448,697 97.5 574 97.4 610 92.3 — — — — July 2009 431,323 97.7 800 98.5 729 93.0 3,592 72.5 — — August 2009 412,871 98.0 547 97.8 577 95.1 2,284 98.0 — — September 2009 398,351 98.0 491 94.9 638 95.9 2,234 88.5 6,286 76.4 October 2009 415,740 98.6 600 98.0 647 95.0 3,081 98.8 6,446 88.7 November 2009 420,291 98.4 577 95.0 594 96.8 2,621 98.6 7,047 92.5 Key: UKHO: United Kingdom Hydrographic Office DSTL: Defence Science and Technology Laboratory DSG: Defence Support Group
The Government are committed to improving the payment culture in the UK in order to create a fair and stable business climate. Government Departments and their agencies should aim to pay all invoices not in dispute within 10 days or within the agreed contractual terms if otherwise specified.
The Ministry of Defence fully supports this policy.
Olympics
Olympic Games: Education
“Get Set” is the official London 2012 education programme for schools, colleges and local authority education providers across the UK. It is managed by The London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games and funded by the Department for Children, Schools and Families.
The “Get Set” programme offers a wide range of opportunities for young people between 3 and 19 to connect with London 2012 and also for education providers across the UK to use “Get Set” materials. There are over 9,000 schools, colleges and other learning institutions registered.
The “Get Set” website:
www.london2012.com/getset
offers learning providers a range of resources such as films, activity ideas and games based around the Paralympic and Olympic values.
It is updated on a regular basis to provide fresh ideas and additional support materials. For example, teachers were provided with material to mark 1,000 days to go to London 2012 and resources will also be released to tie in with the Vancouver Winter Olympic Games beginning in February.
The resources available include information on the history of the Olympic/Paralympic movements which can be used on the web or downloaded as factsheets.
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Animal Welfare Act 2006
[holding answer 6 January 2010]: The codes of practice for the welfare of cats, dogs and horses were laid before Parliament on 8 December. If approved by Parliament, they will come into force on 6 April 2010.
A summary of the responses can be found on the DEFRA website and copies of all the responses have been placed in the House Library.
Animals: Codes of Practice
The main purpose of the cat and dog codes is to assist the courts in cases of poor welfare, brought under the Animal Welfare Act, in relation to cats or dogs. Another purpose is to provide owners of cats and dogs with guidance in how to meet the welfare needs of their animals, as required under the Act. Protecting the progeny of animals is not covered in the code.
The breeding of dogs has been considered by the Associate Parliamentary Group on Animal Welfare, which reported in the autumn. The report from Sir Patrick Bateson on dog breeding will be published in January. The recommendations from these two inquiries will need careful consideration and to issue a code of practice on breeding at this juncture might preempt the conclusions we draw from this valuable work.
Campaign for the Farmed Environment
I have met with the leaders of both organisations a number of times over recent months to discuss how best to recapture the environmental benefits of set-aside through the development of the Campaign for the Farmed Environment, as have my ministerial colleagues and our officials. The Memorandum of Understanding which has been signed by all the campaign partners, including DEFRA, CLA and NFU, and the nearly £3 million of funding which the Department has earmarked for the campaign, demonstrates the commitment of all the partners to its success.
The campaign's targets are for England and are not county-specific. It is currently too early to assess the impact of the campaign on the ground, following its official launch on 5 November 2009, but I have just received an interim report from the campaign's industry partners reporting on progress to date with setting up the campaign. DEFRA has also recently sent out a baseline sample survey of farmers' existing voluntary actions, against which future annual surveys will establish the progress of the campaign. Our intention is that the results of the first of these surveys will be published in summer 2010.
Domestic Waste: Waste Disposal
DEFRA and the Waste and Resources Action Programme do not hold this information.
Food: Climate Change
The Government have not funded research to look specifically at the impacts of climate change on storage of food products. However, we have funded research to improve storage of products to extend storage time, maintain quality in storage and therefore reduce losses. This has been achieved through improvements in storage technology and crop management.
We have also commissioned research to develop storage technologies that are more sustainable. The knowledge and improved technologies delivered provide greater resilience to climate change because they provide options for adaptation. A non-exhaustive list of relevant research projects is shown in the following table.
Further information on these projects is available from the DEFRA website at:
http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Location=None &Module=FilterSearchNewLook&Completed=Q
Code Title Start End Cost (£) FO0308 Development of diffuse browning disorder in relation to physiological and biochemical changes in apple fruit during development and storage April 2007 March 2009 201,094 LK09105 A novel strategy for reducing wastage in potato storage by improved control of tuber dormancy. October 2007 March 2008 42,468 LK0985 Defining and managing risks to safety and quality during food and feed grain storage July 2006 July 2011 648,020 LK0967 Biopesticides for the control of storage insect pests April 2005 September 2009 393,114 AR0603 Interaction of biology and behaviour of storage insects with environmental conditions in bulk grain April 2002 March 2006 655,327 AR0604 Safe storage of grain by preventing and controlling the development of mite pests April 2002 March 2006 614,325 HH2602SFV Molecular and biochemical characters of post harvest quality in brassicas January 2002 December 2005 539,903 LK0929 Improving the detection and monitoring of storage beetle pests by development of a multi-species lure October 2002 September 2005 221,329 HH2603STF The potential for manipulating the orchard microflora to control storage rot fungi April 2001 March 2005 208,399 HH2604STF Storage rots in plums and cherries September 2001 August 2004 154,852 HH2606STF Identify the mechanisms of a naturally-occurring, heritable trait for reduced ethylene production in apple fruits April 2001 March 2004 494,252 LK0919 Control of potato storage diseases by laser treatment October 2001 September 2004 116,015 HH2118STF Integrated control of new storage rot problems in apples and pears. April 1998 March 2001 153,781 HH2120TTF Expanding the potential of the UK stone fruit industry by the use of modern storage technology April 1998 March 2001 246,847 HH2114STF Investigation into improving storage of horticultural produce by control of ethylene metabolism. October 1997 September 2000 306,013
Hunting Act 2004
[holding answer 6 January 2010]: The following table shows the number of defendants found guilty at all courts in England and Wales for offences under the Hunting Act 2004 from 2005-07 (latest available).
Data for 2008 is planned for publication on 28 January 2010.
Number 2005 2 2006 5 2007 48 1 Came into force on 18 February 2005. 2 The court proceedings statistics relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences, the principal offence is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe. 3 Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. Source: Justice Statistics Analytical Services: Ministry of Justice. (Ref: 591-09)
Sewers: Private Sector
There is little point transferring existing private sewers if a new stock of private sewers is allowed to grow over time to replace it. Therefore, provision is contained in the Flood and Water Management Bill, currently before Parliament, for new sewers connecting to the public system to be built to a mandatory standard and then adopted by water and sewerage companies. DEFRA officials are working with stakeholders on the preparation of a mandatory build standard for consultation.
Subject to the successful passage of the Bill, I anticipate that the standards should be published in advance of the transfer of existing private sewers and lateral drains.
Leader of the House
Members: Allowances
No claims for expenditure incurred on or after 1 January 2010 will be paid from Communications Expenditure, with the exception of expenditure on advertisements for surgeries, including posters (subject to restrictions set out as follows) and maintenance of equipment funded from Communications Expenditure where there are contractual commitments.
Advertisements for surgeries, where the expenditure is incurred on or after 1 January 2010 and is funded by Communications Expenditure, must not include party colours or logos and slogans, must not include extraneous material, must be proportionate in nature, and may not include advertisements in national media or leaflets or flyers; references to other elected officials must be approved in advance by the Department of Resources.
No materials or resources, other than websites and office equipment, purchased from Communications Expenditure before 1 January 2010 may be used on or after that date unless the Member first returns the full cost of those resources to the House.
Where Communications Expenditure is used to fund an ongoing cost or item which occurs across both the restricted and unrestricted period, only the relevant fraction of the costs can be paid for out of Communications Expenditure, unless the item concerned is (i) one of the items excepted in the first paragraph above or (ii) the Member entered into an unconditional obligation to pay for the item using Communications Expenditure on or before 23 November 2009 and the item is not used on or after 1 January 2010.
The Department of Resources issued detailed guidance on 16 December 2009. Members who have any queries about their own Communications Expenditure during the restricted period should seek advice from the Department.
The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority has today published a draft allowances scheme for consultation under section 5 of the Parliamentary Standards Act 2009.
Cabinet Office
Central Office of Information: Procurement
(2) who the members are of the panel which approves suppliers to the Central Office of Information;
(3) what the names are of the approved suppliers to the Central Office of Information.
I have asked the chief executive of the Central Office of Information to reply to the hon. Member.
Letter from Mark Lund, dated 6 January 2010:
As Chief Executive of the Central Office of Information (COI), I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Questions on the COI Suppliers (307857/8/9).
Central Office of Information (COI) has 29 lists of approved suppliers referred to in the Public Contract Regulations 2006 as framework agreements. As a public sector body, COI has to comply with the requirements outlined in the Regulations when setting up framework agreements. The list of framework agreements and the suppliers that sit on each can be found on the COI website at
http://coi.gov.uk/suppliers.php?page=31
The requirements and deliverables expected of suppliers on each framework agreement differs, however suppliers are assessed to ensure that they are capable of providing the services that the framework agreement is set-up to deliver and to ensure that value for money is achieved through quality of the service, their technical ability and price.
The members of the panel that carry out the assessment of suppliers onto each framework agreement differs for each but is typically made up of at least two technical experts and one procurement expert. The final list of suppliers is signed off by the Director of the area and the Commercial Director.
Government Departments: Security
I have been asked to reply.
Statistical data held by the Ministry of Justice on the Court Proceedings Database record the number of defendants proceeded against, found guilty and sentenced for criminal offences in England and Wales on a persons basis.
These data do not include information on the circumstances of an offence and it is therefore not possible to separately identify offences under the Computer Misuse Act 1990 that have resulted from unauthorised access to computer systems of Government Departments.
Non-departmental Public Bodies
Cabinet Office produces an annual report on the size and spend of the non-departmental public body sector entitled “Public Bodies”. Cabinet Office aims to publish “Public Bodies 2009” shortly.
Northern Ireland
AccessNI
It is not possible to provide information for the period 1 April 2008 to 31 March 2009 in the manner requested. During this period AccessNI processed 115,268 applications. It was unable to meet its service standards between May and December 2008, but did meet them between January and March 2009. Information for the period 1 April to 31 October 2009 is set out in the following table.
Month Number of basic processed Percentage within target1 Number of standard processed Percentage within target Number of enhanced processed Percentage within target April 1,092 86.91 281 97.22 10,687 93.14 May 1,310 97.58 386 99.47 8,181 96.9 June 1,691 97.20 1,014 98.99 11,052 94.28 July 1,611 97.63 966 97.12 10,529 94.63 August 1,340 96.21 460 98.95 8,706 96.3 September 1,822 99.19 1,184 99.41 10,538 96.71 October 1,573 98.73 1,497 98.75 13,434 96.43 Totals 10,439 5,788 73,127 1 Basic target is 90 per cent. in two weeks 2 Standard target is 90 per cent. in three weeks 3 Enhanced target is 90 per cent. in four weeks
Clergy: Misconduct
Northern Ireland Office Ministers have had no discussions on these matters, nor any requests to discuss them, with any of the parties specified.
Departmental Legislation
I refer the hon. Member to my answer of 7 December 2009, Official Report, column 21W, which considered primary legislation to include both Westminster Acts of Parliament and, for Northern Ireland, Orders in Council which would elsewhere be classified as secondary legislation. For the purposes of the current question I am therefore treating secondary legislation for Northern Ireland to cover statutory instruments excluding orders in Council.
Excluding agencies and non-departmental public bodies, the Northern Ireland Office has made four statutory rules which have made or repealed offences since 1 May 2008.
The Representation of the People (Northern Ireland) Regulations 2008; the Northern Ireland Assembly (Elections) (Amendment) Order 2009; and the European Parliamentary Elections (Northern Ireland) (Amendment) Order 2009 updated Northern Ireland electoral procedures. This brought them in line with changes made to UK electoral law by the Electoral Administration Act 2006 and included offences relating to voting and electoral registration procedures.
The Electoral Administration Act 2006 (Regulation of Loans etc: Northern Ireland) Order 2008 also provides for an offence of disclosing information contained in transaction reports in circumstances other than those set out in the order.
Transport
Cycling
Estimates from the National Travel Survey suggest that, across England as a whole, 31 per cent. of children and 10 per cent. of adults regularly cycled (i.e. at least one bicycle trip per week) between 2006 and 2008.
Equivalent statistics for Gloucestershire and the Stroud district are not available and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. However, for urban areas with resident populations of between 25,000 and 50,000 (such as the town of Stroud), the equivalent estimates were 30 per cent. for children and 10 per cent. for adults.
Departmental Official Hospitality
Generally, the Department for Transport (DFT) operates a no alcohol policy. In exceptional cases, where the Department is holding a special event or staff are attending a venue away from their normal office and working long hours necessitating an evening meal, some limited provision of alcoholic drinks at public expense may be permitted at the discretion of a senior civil servant. Spend incurred in such situations is not centrally recorded and this information could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
However, The Driving Standards Agency, Government Car and Despatch Agency, Highways Agency, Maritime and Coastguard Agency and the Vehicle Certification Agency recorded zero expenditure on alcohol.
Entertainment costs are not recorded as a specific cost category within the Department for Transport's accounting systems. To identify such expenditure would incur disproportionate costs. However, the Government Car and Despatch Agency and Highways Agency have both recorded zero expenditure on entertainment.
Departmental Pay
The Department for Transport does not employ a full-time chief information officer. The role is split between the Director General and Director responsible, alongside wider policy responsibilities, for issues including information and knowledge management, data security, information and communication technology and knowledge management, in which they are supported by professional staff in the central Department and its agencies. There is no centrally managed budget for CIO activity. The budget for 2009-10 for the Information Management Directorate for ICT in the central Department was £13.5 million.
Driving Under Influence: Drugs
The Department for Transport usually assesses the effectiveness of its advertising in three ways:
The effect on individuals’ awareness, motivation and claimed behaviours, which we measure through quantitative and qualitative research.
Progress against indicators such as in the case of our THINK! road safety campaign, the number of people killed or seriously injured.
How effectively it buys media space. Analysis by independent media auditors benchmarks the Government’s performance against private sector advertisers. Collectively, the Government are an efficient purchaser of media.
The THINK! Drug Drive advertising campaign ran from 17 August to 13 September 2009. The Department has not yet received or assessed all of the data listed above. However, research, including pre-campaign and post-campaign tracking surveys and website statistics, provides early indicators that the campaign has performed well against its core objectives including raising awareness of the risks of drug-driving.
East Coast Railway Line
When rail franchises are let, the Department for Transport routinely prepares a “shadow bid” to provide a detailed estimate of the likely costs and revenues of the new franchise. In the case of the next Inter City East Coast franchise, this evaluation will be based on the costs and revenues of the current public sector train operator.
Local Government: Snow and Ice
The most recent discussions I have held with the Local Government Association on local authorities’ contingency plans in respect of extreme weather conditions were on 4 January 2010. Department for Transport officials are also in regular contact and discussion with the Local Government Association on these matters.
Lorries: Road Traffic
[holding answer 6 January 2010]: The estimated miles travelled by heavy goods vehicles on dual carriageways in England, Wales and Scotland in 2008 is shown in the following table.
Road network information for dual carriageways is not available for Northern Ireland.
Billion vehicle miles England 3.5 Scotland 0.4 Wales 0.2 Great Britain 4.1 Northern Ireland Not available Source: National Road Traffic Survey (2008).
(2) how many miles UK and foreign registered heavy goods vehicles over 3.5 tonnes travelled on all roads in England in the last year for which figures are available; and what information his Department holds on the equivalent figures for (a) Scotland, (b) Wales and (c) Northern Ireland.
[holding answer 6 January 2010]: The Department for Transport does not hold figures on traffic or the country of vehicle registration for Northern Ireland, but the estimated miles travelled by UK and foreign registered heavy goods vehicles over 3.5 tonnes on all roads in England, Scotland and Wales is shown in the following table.
Billion vehicle miles Registered heavy goods vehicles UK Foreign Total England 4.78 0.56 15.3 Scotland 1.68 0.03 1.7 Wales 0.77 0.03 0.8 Sources: Traffic: National Road Traffic Survey. Registration: Vehicle Excise Duty Evasion Survey (June 2008).
Due to small sample sizes, the estimates of miles driven in England, Scotland and Wales will be subject to a margin of uncertainty, and the sample size is too small to provide reliable estimates of the miles travelled by road class.
Northern Rail: Rolling Stock
The Department for Transport has been in recent discussion with Northern Rail regarding their proposals for delivering additional capacity through the High Level Output Specification (HLOS). These discussions which are currently ongoing have included the totality of their rolling stock fleet including class 142s.
The recently announced electrification programme in the North West will also allow some class 142 Pacer vehicles that operate on these lines to be replaced with electric trains.
In addition, the Department meets with each of the Rolling Stock Leasing Companies (ROSCOs) on a regular basis to discuss their respective portfolio of rolling stock vehicles, which includes class 142 Pacer vehicles.
Railways: Franchises
Under current legislation, the Secretary of State has the ability to step in to secure continuity of train service provision only if a train operator becomes unable to meet the terms of its franchise agreement. However, this can only be a temporary arrangement as there is no provision for train services to be permanently retained in the public sector without a change to legislation.
Therefore the Department for Transport has made no assessment of the value for money of operating rail passenger services in the public sector on a permanent basis after each passenger franchise expires.
Rolling Stock
[holding answer 23 November 2009]: A total of 380 new and additional vehicles are already either in service or are being prepared for service subject to the train operator finalising service plans.
This includes 232 new vehicles currently in operation with the following train operators:
TOC Class Type Number of vehicles Southern Railway 377 EMU 48 London Midland 350/2 EMU 148 Southern Railway 377 EMU 36
311 further new vehicles have been ordered and manufacturers are currently progressing their construction.
The Department for Transport has specified all Super Express Trains to be capable of operating either with a guard or in driver-only operation. This reflects the flexibility of train deployment on different route types, including long distance and commuter. As today, the mode of operation of services on specific routes will be managed by the train operating company.
Super Express Trains will offer suitable equipment to deliver on-train catering, ranging from at-seat trolley to full restaurant buffet car service. The catering provision will vary according to the service being operated and, as today, will be managed by the train operating company.
Communities and Local Government
Council Tax
The information requested is not held centrally.
Councillors: Codes of Practice
While the Model Code of Conduct for councillors contains no specific provision on freemasonry, it does require members to include in their register of interests their membership of any charitable bodies; freemasons consider themselves such a body.
Departmental Advertising
Information on the Department for Communities and Local Government expenditure on advertising is published every year in its Annual Report. Since 2008-09 this information has been published in a format which allows it to be broken down by the type of media used. However, the information is not available for previous years in this format.
For the financial year 2008-09 I refer the hon. Member to the information provided on the Department's website at:
http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/corporate/pdf/1298507.pdf
For previous years I refer the hon. Member to the appropriate departmental Annual Report, available in the House Library.
The Department will publish a breakdown of advertising expenditure in 2009-10 at the time of its next Annual Report.
The Department does not hold data on the proportion of its advertising expenditure managed by the Central Office of Information.
Departmental Conferences
The Department does not hold this information centrally and it could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
The Planning Inspectorate does not hold this information centrally and it could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Fire Service College does not hold this information centrally and it could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Queen Elizabeth Conference Centre can confirm that have not had any expenditure on cancelled conferences.
Departmental Pay
The following table shows the average and highest payments of non-consolidated variable payments awarded by CLG to the senior civil service over the last five financial years.
Average amount paid Highest amount paid 2009-10 7,365 12,500 2008-09 8,396 20,500 2007-08 6,597 16,270 2006-07 6,868 12,500 2005-06 4,954 9,500
Departmental Responsibilities
The Department’s spending plans for 2009-10 were set out in the main estimates published on 18 June 2009 (HC 514) and the associated explanatory memorandum for the Communities and Local Government Select Committee published at:
http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmcomloc/memo/mainestimate/ucm01.pdf
Changes to those plans were set out in the winter supplementary estimates published on 24 November 2009 (HC 24), with further detail set out in the explanatory memorandum to the Select Committee, copies of which are available in the Library of the House.
Further changes will be published in the forthcoming spring supplementary estimates in February.
Departmental Telephone Services
Communities and Local Government does not operate or sponsor telephone contact lines with the relevant prefixes. The departmental contact number is an 030 number which is reserved for public services and calls to this service are charged at national rate. No revenue is raised through this service.
Energy Performance Certificates
The full evaluation of the EPBD is expected to be completed in mid-2010 when copies will be placed in the Library of the House.
No such estimate has been made.
However, the Department for Communities and Local Government is working with the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors and other stakeholders on a project to explore the extent to which energy performance is reflected in the value of a property and the effect on the market price of homes as a result of the installation of energy efficiency and renewable heat and energy technologies.
Government Office for London: Location
A relocation project is in progress, being run jointly by the Government office for London and the Communities and Local Government Estates Directorate, in line with the Government Estates Transformation Programme.
The project has identified Eland House, currently part of the Communities and Local Government Estate, as the most suitable location. The relocation project has an anticipated completion date of 31 December 2010, well in advance of the expiry of the lease on Riverwalk House.
Home Information Packs
I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave on 8 July 2009, Official Report, columns 902-03W, to the hon. Member for Peterborough (Mr. Jackson).
(2) whether estate agents are liable for misleading omissions made by a home seller producing a property information questionnaire; and what obligations estate agents have to check the (a) accuracy and (b) truthfulness of property information questionnaires.
Section 155 of the Housing Act 2004 provides that the person responsible for marketing is under a duty to have a Home Information Pack (HIP) in his possession which complies with the Home Information Pack (No. 2) Regulations 2007. Where the person responsible for marketing is an estate agent, Regulation 36 provides that he cannot be held in breach where a document (other than the Index and Sale Statement) fails to comply with the Regulations and the agent believed on reasonable grounds that it did comply.
Estate agents are under a duty under the Home Information Pack (No. 2) Regulations 2007 to ensure that the HIP includes a completed Property Information Questionnaire (PIQ) but are not under a duty to ensure that the answers given by the seller are accurate and truthful. An estate agent could be in breach of the Consumer Protection Regulations (CPRs) if he failed to act on information in the PIQ which he knew to be inaccurate or untruthful, because they are required by the CPRs to act in accordance with honest market practice and good faith.
Local Government and Housing Act 1989
The Department does not have information about the number of local authority members who have not complied with section 19(2) of the Local Government and Housing Act.
Local Government Finance
The monetary value of area based grant (ABG) for 2010-11 is £5,028,317,187. The allocation for 2011-12 has yet to be announced. Decisions on future public spending plans will be a matter for the next spending review.
The criteria used to allocate departmental contributions to ABG are decided by the respective Departments, and will reflect factors such as relative need for the services covered by each contribution to the Grant. For example, the distribution of money for schools intervention will take account of the number of maintained schools in the area.
I have placed in the Library of the House tables showing central Government grant per capita by local authority for 2008-09 and 2009-10. However, it should be noted that figures between the two years are not directly comparable because the 2008-09 figures are based on outturn information whereas those for 2009-10 are based on budget information. It should also be borne in mind that local authorities may not have complete information about all central Government grants at the time they completed the budget returns.
The definition of central Government grant used here is the sum of formula grant (revenue support grant, redistributed non-domestic rates and police grant), Greater London authority grant, specific grants inside Aggregate External Finance (AEF), i.e. revenue grants paid for council’s core services and Area Based Grant (ABG).
Figures exclude grants outside AEF (i.e. where funding is not for authorities’ core services, but is passed to a third party, for example, rent allowances and rebates), capital grants, funding for the local authorities’ housing management responsibilities and those grant programmes (such as European funding) where authorities are simply one of the recipients of funding paid towards an area.
Mid-year 2008 population estimates are used to calculate per capita information. 2009 figures are not yet available. For National Parks mid-year 2007 estimates are used because they are the most recent available.
Local Government Finance: Lancashire
The following table shows central Government funding provided to Lancashire county council and Preston city council in real terms at 2008-09 prices. Figures between the two years are not directly comparable because those for 1997-98 are based on outturn information whereas those for 2009-10 are based on budget information. In addition, local authorities may not have had complete information about all central Government grants at the time of completing the budget returns.
1997-98 2009-10 Lancashire 955.4 1,210.0 Preston 16.9 21.9 Source: Communities and Local Government Revenue Outturn (RO) returns for 1997-98 and 2009-10.
The definition of central Government grant used here is the sum of formula grant (revenue support grant, redistributed non-domestic rates and police grant) and specific grants inside aggregate external finance (AEF), i.e. revenue grants paid for council’s core services. In 2009-10 figures include area-based grant (ABG).
Figures exclude grants outside AEF (i.e. where funding is not for authorities’ core services, but is passed to a third party, for example, rent allowances and rebates), capital grants, funding for the local authorities’ housing management responsibilities and those grant programmes (such as European funding) where authorities are simply one of the recipients of funding paid towards an area.
Local Government: Accountability
Chapter 1 of the Strengthening Local Democracy consultation sought views on the extension of scrutiny powers of Local Area Agreement partners and whether these should be made more explicit in relation to the wider delivery of local public services in an area. The consultation also asked whether the structure of local partnerships should be reviewed in order to identify unhelpful overlap and duplication and whether these were particular issues on which such a review should focus. Over 1,400 responses were received to this consultation and I will be publishing the formal response to it in due course.
In addition, on 23 December, I received the formal shortlist of 199 proposals from the Local Government Association in its role as the Selector under the provisions of the Sustainable Communities Act, and a number of these make suggestions about accountability mechanisms for local authorities and other bodies.
Local Government: Contracts
The Improvement and Development Agency for local government (IdeA) have commissioned the British Institute of Human Rights to carry out a project looking at the relevance of a human rights approach to local government and service delivery. We will consider the need for any revised guidance in light of the outcome of this project.
Local Government: Elections
As made clear in the statutory Code of Recommended Practice on Local Authority Publicity issued by my Department, section 2 of the Local Government Act 1986 provides that council resources should never be used for purely political purposes.
Standards for England have published guidance on the use of local authority resource for political campaigning, both in their guide to the local authority members’ code of conduct and in their ‘Case Review’ for 2007. Both publications are available from Standards for England’s website at:
www.standardsforengland.gov.uk
Local Government: Insurance
An impact assessment reporting on the impact of providing powers for local authorities to enter into mutual insurance arrangements was published on 13 October 2009. This is accessible at:
www.communities.gov.uk/publications/localgovernment/bestvalueauthorityia
Companies through which authorities are required to operate when exercising the power to form and participate in mutual insurance bodies, as set out in the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009, will be required to comply with competition law.
Local Government: Public Consultation
In addition to staff time, the Department for Communities and Local Government spent £113,781 on the redress review.
The Department accepted the recommendation to run a series of pilots for local authorities and partnerships to test and develop the Practitioner’s Toolkit produced by the review when it was presented with the review in June 2009. Nine local authorities are piloting the toolkit, and further information is available on our website at:
http://www.communities.gov.uk/communities/communityempowerment/communitiesincontrol/redressreview/
One of these pilots is looking at how best partners could come together to deliver better services and remedies for people recently made redundant. The pilots also include elements as the sharing of learning at regional events, all of which were also recommendations of the review.
The Government will be making a formal response to the review shortly.
Local Government: Publicity
The Department has given no funding to the Local Government Information Unit to conduct research in relation to any revised draft of the Code of Recommended Practice on Local Authority Publicity.
Mortgages
Communities and Local Government is working closely with HMT, FSA and all those involved in the sale of new homes to support a sustainable and transparent mortgage market.
According to the CML Regulated Mortgage Survey, the average initial mortgage rate on new build was 4.63 per cent. in October 2009, compared to 4.42 per cent. on other properties.
Non-Domestic Rates
The average non-domestic rates bill (in £s) in England in each year since 1997-98, including the estimated average figures for 2009-10, both in cash and in real terms based on 2009 prices, is shown in the following table.
£ Cash Real terms 1997-98 6,796 9,196 1998-99 7,016 9,126 1999-00 6,998 8,959 2000-01 8,264 10,275 2001-02 8,714 10,647 2002-03 9,071 10,919 2003-04 9,137 10,665 2004-05 9,301 10,593 2005-06 9,997 11,035 2006-07 10,275 11,059 2007-08 10,330 10,637 2008-09 11,274 11,142 2009-10 (estimated) 12,145 12,145
The data are taken from National non-domestic rates (NNDR) returns submitted by all billing authorities in England. Figures for 2009-10 are estimates.
Average business rate is calculated by dividing the net rate yield from local authority's lists by the number of hereditaments on the local list as at 31 December of the previous year.
Comparisons between years may not be valid as the rateable values for individual properties, and hence the actual rates bills, vary greatly. In addition, the figures for 1998-99 to 2000-01 are affected by transfers of properties from the central list to local ones; transfers of crown properties to local lists and adjustments made to the multiplier at the time of the 2000 revaluation. Changes in the figures for the years around 2005-06 are also affected by adjustments made to the multiplier at the time of the 2005 revaluation.
Non-Domestic Rates: Valuation
A table showing the precise rateable values could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
Ordnance Survey: Photography
There are no aerial photographs within OS MasterMap® Address Layer 2.
Planning Permission
We have no policy about the number of statutory notices which local authorities may place in local newspapers.
The Code of Recommended Practice on Local Authority Publicity, to which local authorities must have regard in coming to any decision on publicity, including their job advertisements, states that the media chosen for job vacancies should be in keeping with the objective of maintaining the politically independent status of local authority staff.
Rates and Rating
I have placed in the Library of the House a table showing the number of small and large hereditaments in England broken down by billing authority on the 2005 and the draft 2010 Rating Lists as at 2 November 2009. A hereditament is classified as small in the 2005 Rating Lists if it has a rateable value of less than £21,500 in London or £15,000 elsewhere. A hereditament is classified as small in the draft 2010 Rating Lists if it has a rateable value of less than £25,500 in London or £18,000 elsewhere. These data are consistent with the statistical release titled: “Non-domestic rateable values: 2010 Local Rating Lists—England and Wales”, published on 18 December 2009. A copy of this statistical release is available at the following:
http://www.voa.gov.uk/publications/statistical_releases/VOA_Statistics_Release_Final.pdf
The number of hereditaments has been rounded to the nearest 10.
Social Rented Housing: Waiting Lists
Figures on the number of households registered on social housing waiting lists were published on 26 November in the Statistical Release, “Local Authority Housing Statistics, England: 2008-09”. This release can be found at:
http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/corporate/statistics/lahousing200809
Tenant Services Authority
Policy on rent controls is a matter for Government.
Our intention is that the Tenant Services Authority (TSA) should have the role of deciding when an inspection of a local authority’s landlord services is needed, and that the TSA should then commission the Audit Commission to carry out such an inspection. This policy was set out in our consultation document “The Housing and Regeneration Act 2008 (Registration of Local Authorities) Order 2009”, published in August 2009, and confirmed in our response to that consultation, which we published in November 2009.
The TSA will participate with the Comprehensive Area Assessment regime alongside the other participating public service inspectorates.
Tenant Services Authority: Manpower
I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave him on 30 November 2009, Official Report, column 514W.
Home Department
Asylum
The reasons for the overpayment of £9.6 million were set out in the notes to the Home Office Resource Accounts.
The notes also set out the actions taken by UK Border Agency to improve controls, these actions have been subject to continual review during the current financial year to ensure they have been effective.
Asylum: Housing
A table showing asylum seekers supported in accommodation, by UK Government office region and parliamentary constituency, as at the end of September 2009, was made available in the Commons Library on 26 November 2009 as part of the quarterly publications.
Information on immigration and asylum are published annually and quarterly. Annual statistics and the latest statistics for Q3 2009 are available from the Library of the House and from the Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate web-site at:
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/immigration-asylum-stats.html.
Control Orders
[holding answer 6 January 2010]: As of 10 December 2009, the last date covered by the most recent written ministerial statement on control orders, 33 individuals had previously been but were no longer subject to a control order.
The Government are not willing to comment on the residential status of individuals who may or may not be of current interest to the intelligence agencies and the police beyond the information that has already appeared in the public domain in ministerial statements and answers to both Houses, and in open court judgments on control orders.
Counter-terrorism
The Channel Project provides a mechanism for ensuring that individuals identified as vulnerable to violent extremism are referred to and assessed by a multi-agency panel. The panel decides on the most appropriate action or intervention required to reduce this vulnerability. It therefore has a key role to play in driving delivery of Objective three of the Prevent Strategy: “Supporting vulnerable individuals who are being targeted and recruited to the cause of violent extremism”.
The Association of Chief Police Officers is responsible for national delivery of Channel, which is currently operating across 12 police forces.
Crime: Computers
(2) how many (a) investigations, (b) prosecutions and (c) convictions were made for offences related to spamming in each of the last three years; and if he will make a statement;
(3) how many (a) investigations, (b) prosecutions and (c) convictions there were for offences involving the deceptive installation of adware on to computer systems in each of the last three years.
Information on the number of investigations undertaken by the police is not collected centrally. The Home Office do collect data on the number of offences that are recorded by the police.
Phishing attacks, spamming and deceptive installation of adware are general terms. Specific offences, as defined in law, would be classified under the appropriate section of Computer Misuse Act 1990 dependent upon the circumstances of the individual offences. Such offences would then be recorded under Home Office classification 53B ‘Preserved other fraud and repealed fraud offences (Pre Fraud Act 2006)’. Offences recorded under individual sections of the Computer Misuse Act cannot be separately identified from the other offences recorded within this offence classification.
Prosecutions and convictions data are collected by the Ministry of Justice and are also related to offences as defined by legislation.
Departmental Fines
The Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 has provided a series of new sanctions for employers who employ illegal migrant workers. This includes a system of civil penalties, under which an employer can be fined up to £10,000 per person he/she is found to be employing illegally.
Additionally, Bulgarian and Romanian nationals who work illegally commit a criminal offence and may be served with a fixed penalty fine of £1,000 under criminal law.
Part II of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 enables the Secretary of State to impose a £2,000 fixed charge on any air or sea carrier for each non-European Economic Area passenger they bring to the UK who fails to produce, on request, a valid travel document satisfactorily establishing their identity and nationality and, if required, a valid visa.
The Department can also impose a civil penalty on those responsible for carrying clandestine entrants, concealed in a vehicle. The maximum penalty which can be imposed upon the owner/hirer of such a vehicle is £2,000 per clandestine and upon the driver £2,000 per clandestine, the aggregated maximum per clandestine (applied where more than one person is responsible) is £4,000.
The UK Borders Act 2007 enables the Secretary of State to make regulations requiring foreign nationals who are subject to immigration control apply for an Identity Card for Foreign Nationals. Failure to comply with such a requirement may result in the imposition of a sanction, which may include a civil financial penalty up to a maximum of £1,000.
The value of penalties recovered is set out in the table.
£000 2008-09 8,512 2007-08 6,844 2006-07 5,787 2005-06 5,932 2004-05 5,872 2003-04 6,843 2002-03 5,279 2001-02 6,783 2000-01 8,892 1999-2000 9,370
The police forces in England and Wales have the power to issue fixed penalty notices as a sanction against a specified list of offences, mainly related to public order (Penalty Notices for Disorder) and motoring.
For the Department's agencies, no penalties are levied.
Departmental Information and Communications Technology
The chief information officer of the Home Office is employed in a substantive senior civil service pay band two post. The CIO is responsible for a delegated budget of £5,109,000 for 2009-10.
Departmental Manpower
As of 31 October, 397 civil servants worked in the Office for Security and Counter Terrorism (OSCT).
We estimate that during 2008-09, the OSCT spent some £22,000 on flights within Great Britain and some £264,000 on flights overseas. We do not keep a central record of the number of flights taken by officials and this cannot be provided without incurring disproportionate cost.
All travel by civil servants is undertaken in accordance with the guidelines set out in the Civil Service Management Code and any other guidance as applicable contained within Managing Public Money and the Treasury handbook on Regularity and Propriety.
Departmental Official Hospitality
The Home Office systems do not separately identify the cost of alcohol from overall entertainment costs, and this could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
However, we do retain records for hospitality provided by both civil servants and Ministers. The spend for 2008-09, the last 12 month period for which there are audited figures, was £50,371.
Home Office expenditure on official hospitality and entertainment conforms to departmental guidance on financial procedures and propriety, which complies with the principles of Managing Public Money and the Treasury handbook on Regularity and Propriety. Hospitality is defined as the provision of food, drink and entertainment of non-civil servants at modest cost where it is beneficial to the interests of the Department.
For the Department’s agencies, the Criminal Records Bureau and the Identity and Passport Service’s spend could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Departmental Pay
Non-consolidated performance payments are an integral element of the staff reward package in the Home Office. They encourage and reward high performance. As non-consolidated payments, they have to be re-earned each year and do not add to future pay bill costs, for example pensions costs.
The Home Office (including the UK Border Agency), as part of its annual pay arrangements, pays non-consolidated performance related payments to up to 35 per cent. of its staff. There are separate arrangements for the Department’s senior staff, which are set by the Prime Minister for the whole senior civil service, following independent advice from the Senior Salaries Review Body.
In the financial years for which data are available the total salary bill for staff in the Home Office and UKB and the proportion of which was paid in non-consolidated performance payments was:
Total salary bill Non-consolidated payments 2005-06 752 4.28 2006-07 723 4.45 2007-08 710 4.48 2008-09 791 4.75
It is also possible to give one-off non-consolidated special payments to members of staff in-year to reward exceptional achievements on a project or programme. The total cost of such payments in 2008-09 was £1.16 million the figure for 2007-08 was £2.56 million.
Departmental Publications
I refer the hon. Gentleman to my written ministerial statement of 2 December 2009, Official Report, column 127WS. The White Paper “Protecting the Public: Supporting the Police to Succeed” was published on 2 December 2009 at:
http://police.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/police-reform/protecting-the-public2835.pdf?view=Binary
Departmental Training
Data are not collected centrally on the number and cost of Home Office staff who have attended overseas training courses, and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Deportation: Expenditure
It is not possible to provide this information in the format requested.
There are a range of costs, such as ticketing, escorting and detention costs that might be involved in removal and there are many staff involved in the removal process across the UK Border Agency, including seconded police officers. To disaggregate the funding and other resources in place to support the removals process from the overall budget and resources would incur disproportionate cost.
Entry Clearances: Overseas Students
[holding answer 6 January 2010]: There have been 228 institutions that have had an application to join the sponsor register refused between 31 March 2009 and 21 December 2009 under Tier 4.
49 Tier 4 sponsors have been removed from the sponsor register between 31 March 2009 and 21 December 2009.
The figures quoted are not provided under National Statistics protocols and have been derived from local management information and are therefore provisional and subject to change.
Extradition: USA
[holding answer 6 January 2010]: In the scheme of the Extradition Act 2003, it falls to the courts to determine whether health factors raise a barrier to a person's extradition. However, the Home Secretary has an implied power to withdraw an extradition order where, exceptionally, a new matter arises subsequent to the completion of all proceedings under the Act but before extradition takes place. The basis for this implied power is section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998, which renders it unlawful for the Home Secretary, as a public authority, to act in a way which is incompatible with a convention right.
Firearms
[holding answer 6 January 2010]: Available information relates to crimes recorded by the police in which firearms (excluding air weapons) were reported to have been fired or used as a blunt instrument resulting in fatal and other injury. Data for England and the Sussex police force area, from 1997-98 up to and including 2007-08, are given in the following table. Constituency level data are not collected centrally.
Firearm offence statistics for 2008-09 will be published on 21 January2010.
Injury type Fatal injury Serious2 or slight injury 1997-98 England 52 745 Sussex 1 15 1998-993 England 50 807 Sussex 2 13 1999-2000 England 62 1,124 Sussex — 16 2000-01 England 71 1,275 Sussex — 13 2001-024 England 94 1,761 Sussex 2 40 2002-035 England 78 2,041 Sussex 1 20 2003-04 England 68 2,245 Sussex 1 9 2004-056 England 76 3,704 Sussex — 25 2005-06 England 48 3,679 Sussex — 23 2006-07 England 56 2,855 Sussex 1 23 2007-08 England 53 3,101 Sussex — 17 1 Where firearms have been fired or used as a blunt instrument. 2 A serious injury is the one which necessitated detention in hospital or involved fractures, concussion, severe general shock, penetration by a bullet or multiple shot wounds. 3 There was a change in the counting rules for recorded crime on 1 April 1998. 4 Figures may have been inflated by some police forces implementing the principles of the National Crime Recording Standard before 1 April 2002. 5 The National Crime Recording Standard was introduced on 1 April 2002. Figures for some crime categories may have been inflated by this. 6 More explicit guidelines for the classification of weapons introduced on 1 April 2004 may have increased the recording of firearm offences, particularly those committed by imitation weapons.
Gangmasters Licensing Authority: Public Relations
I have been asked to reply.
The Gangmasters Licensing Authority has not made any payments to Cavendish Communications in the last 12 months.
Hotels
The current contract for booking hotel rooms for the Home Office Headquarters, Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) and UKBA commenced in December 2008. Available information from this contract and since 2007 from the contract with the Identity and Passport Service on the number of nights booked by officials is as follows:
January 2007 to November 2008 December 2008 to November 2009 (a) Home Office Headquarters 1— 12,345 (b) UKBA 1— 16,356 (b) CRB 1— 5,977 1Information unavailable.
2007 2008 20091 (b) IPS 6,159 10,165 9,376 1To 18 December 2009.
For the period from December 2008 to November 2009, the total fee of the third party agents relating to booking hotel accommodation for both the (i) Home Office Headquarters and (ii) CRB and UKBA equates to £144,469.
Information on hotel room nights booked and the hotel booking fee of the third party agents relating to the previous contract for the Home Office Headquarters and the UKBA for the period January 2007 to December 2008 is unavailable and to obtain it would incur disproportionate cost.
For the Identity and Passport Service the third-party agents booking fee is incorporated into the hotel room cost, and a separate figure is unavailable.
Expenditure is incurred in accordance with the principles of Managing Public Money and the Treasury handbook on Regularity and Propriety.
Immigration: Bexley
(2) what estimate he has made of the number of people in the London borough of Bexley who made an application for leave to remain in the UK in the last 12 months.
The requested information is not collated and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost through the examination of individual case records.
Members: Correspondence
I wrote to my right hon. Friend on 10 December 2009.
[holding answer 6 January 2010]: In the answer of 7 December (pursuant to holding answer of 3 December) I indicated that the matter had been passed to the NPIA for reply in June 2009. The chief executive of the National Policing Improvement Agency, Chief Constable Peter Neyroud, in fact wrote to the hon. Member on 30 June 2009 in response to his original query. I have sent the hon. Gentleman a copy of the letter following this parliamentary question.
[holding answer 6 January 2010]: I wrote to the right hon. Member on 22 December 2009.
(2) when he plans to reply to the letter of 9 November 2009 from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton with regard to Mr. H. J. Kaabane;
(3) when he plans to reply to the letter of 9 November 2009 from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton with regard to Mr. A. Mortlock and Miss D. Taylor;
(4) when he plans to reply to the letter of 9 November 2009 from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton with regard to Mrs. K. Mirza;
(5) when he plans to reply to the letter of 11 November 2009 from the right hon. Member for Manchester Gorton with regard to Mr G. Singh;
(6) when he plans to reply to the letter of 11 November 2009 from the right hon. Member for Manchester Gorton with regard to Mr. M. A. Chaudhry.
I wrote to my right hon. Friend on 16 December 2009.
Police Stations: Statistics
Previously information on the number of police stations opened and closed in England and Wales was collected centrally from police authorities via a yearly survey. The last full survey was for March 2007.
The data that the survey generated were not generally reliable. The management of the police estate and the allocation of resources are matters for police authorities and chief constables to determine.
In the interests of reducing bureaucracy, these data are no longer collected and held centrally.
Police: Complaints
[holding answer 6 January 2010]: As stated previously, the IPCC is responsible for the collation and publication of complaint statistics for England and Wales and has done so since it was established in 2004.
The IPCC first captured information relating to complainant disability in April 2009. However, the IPCC had concerns about the accuracy and quality of the data and did not include the data in its Complaints Statistics for 2008-09. The IPCC will not publish the data until it is confident of their quality and accuracy and is working with forces to ensure the quality and accuracy of the disability data on complaints statistics recorded by forces.
Police: Finance
The provisional police funding settlement for 2010-11 was announced on 26 November 2009. Formula grant funding for all police authorities was provisionally set at £8.3 billion. The following table lists the grant allocation for each police authority.
Government funding for police authorities is chiefly allocated using a funding formula that distributes resources on the basis of relative need.
Police authority 2009-10 formula allocation 1(£ million) 2010-11 allocation1(£ million) Change on 2009-10 formula allocation(percentage) English shire authorities Avon and Somerset 179.7 186.1 3.5 Bedfordshire 70.8 73.1 3.3 Cambridgeshire 81.0 83.5 3.0 Cheshire 120.5 123.5 2.5 Cleveland 97.7 100.1 2.5 Cumbria 67.2 68.9 2.5 Derbyshire 112.6 116.2 3.1 Devon and Cornwall 186.4 191.1 2.5 Dorset 65.3 66.9 2.5 Durham 91.4 93.7 2.5 Essex 177.9 183.1 2.9 Gloucestershire 59.3 60.8 2.5 Hampshire 207.5 213.0 2.7 Hertfordshire 121.2 124.9 3.0 Humberside 128.4 131.8 2.6 Kent 192.1 197.4 2.7 Lancashire 204.1 209.7 2.7 Leicestershire 118.0 121.4 2.9 Lincolnshire 64.3 66.3 3.2 Norfolk 87.6 89.8 2.5 North Yorkshire 76.7 78.6 2.5 Northamptonshire 75.5 77.5 2.7 Nottinghamshire 141.4 146.0 3.3 Staffordshire 120.6 123.8 2.7 Suffolk 71.0 72.7 2.5 Surrey 101.8 104.4 2.5 Sussex 169.8 174.1 2.5 Thames Valley 238.2 244.7 2.8 Warwickshire 54.1 55.6 2.7 West Mercia 121.8 124.9 2.5 Wiltshire 65.2 66.8 2.5 Shires total 3669.0 3770.0 2.8 English metropolitan authorities Greater Manchester 458.9 472.5 3.0 Merseyside 267.4 274.3 2.6 Northumbria 249.9 256.2 2.5 South Yorkshire 204.1 209.2 2.5 West Midlands 486.1 504.3 3.8 West Yorkshire 339.2 350.5 3.3 Mets total 2005.7 2067.1 3.1 London authorities GLA - Police 1978.3 2027.7 2.5 City of London2 21.0 21.8 N/A English total 7674.0 7886.6 2.8 Welsh authorities Dyfed-Powys3 54.4 55.8 2.5 Gwent3 82.6 84.7 2.5 North Wales3 80.1 82.1 2.5 South Wales3 181.5 186.4 2.7 Welsh total 398.6 409.0 2.6 Total 8072.6 8295.7 2.7 1 Rounded to the nearest £100,000. Grant as calculated under the Local Government Finance Report (England) and Local Government Finance (No.2—Provisional Settlement Police Authorities) Report (Wales). Table includes the effects of floors and scaling. 2 Figures for the City of London relate to Home Office Grant only as calculated in the Police Grant Report (England and Wales). Revenue support grant is allocated to the Common Council of the City of London as a whole in respect of all its functions. The City is grouped with education authorities for the purposes of grant floors. 3 Welsh figures include Home Office floor funding.
Police: Manpower
[holding answer 6 January 2010]: Police personnel statistics are not collected by parliamentary constituency. Data for police officers have been collected by Basic Command Unit (BCU) since April 2001 and data for police staff have been collected by BCU since April 2002.
There were 292 police officers in Forest and Gloucester BCU as at 31 March 2002 and 359 police officers as at 31 March 2009.
There were 69 police staff in Forest and Gloucester BCU as at 31 March 2003 and 114 police staff as at 31 March 2009.
Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000
The Home Office intends to publish all responses on its website and will do so shortly. Copies of the responses will also be placed in the Library.
Seven were from members of the public, three identified themselves as individuals from local authorities and the remaining 31 were responses from local authorities.
Religious Buildings: Registration
The Places of Worship Registration Act 1855 (the Act) provides for places of meeting for religious worship, excluding those belonging to the Established Church, to be certified to the Registrar General. A number of tests are applied by the Registrar General when a place of meeting for religious worship is certified to him. This includes the application of the judgment by the Court of Appeal in the Segerdal case in 1970. The main finding in the judgment is that the words ‘place of meeting for religious worship’ in the Act connote a place of which the principal use is for people to come together as a congregation to worship God or do reverence to a deity. A further test is whether the principal use of the building is for worship or for other matters, such as a private home or social club.
Once the Registrar General is satisfied that the place of worship certified to him is capable of recognition, he adds it to the register of such places which, under the Act, he has a duty to maintain.
The duty placed on the Registrar General does not extend to maintaining and retaining records of places or organisations that are not capable of recognition as places of worship under the Act, and the records held in this respect by the Registrar General are incomplete. However, the records that the Registrar General does hold confirm that since 1979, the following organisations have made unsuccessful applications for buildings certified as places of worship to be added to the register:
Miracle Revival Assembly
Calvary Full Gospel Church
Christians not otherwise designated
Roman Catholics
The Methodist Church
Who object to be designated by any distinctive Religious Appellation
Order of Christ Spirit
Christian Spiritualist
Jehovah’s Witnesses
Centre for Christ
Pentecostal Assemblies of God
Baptists
Mount Zion Holiness Assembly
Church of Christ
Christian Fellowship in Huddersfield
Interdenomination
Christians Nazarenes Methodist and Pentecostal
First Church of Christ, Scientist
Wentworth Road Christian Fellowship
Assemblies of God
Llanelli Baptist
Great Conrad Free Church
Calvary Church of God
Church of God
Good News Church Macclesfield
The Spiritualist Sanctuary
German Speaking Evangelical Lutheran Congregation
The Order of Women Freemasons
Muslims
Gur Sangat
Orthodox Christians
Cramlington Spiritualist Church
Frankley Methodist /Anglican Church
Fellowship of Churches of Christ
God’s Church of Peace
Penzance Christian Fellowship
Nailsea Christian Fellowship
Pentwyn Christian Fellowship
Officers and Members of Emmanuel Pentecostal Faith Church of God
Church of Christ of Bethlehem
Weybridge United Reformed Church
Horringer Court Christian Fellowship
Christchurch Abbeydale
Brotherhood Movement
Caribbean House Chaplaincy
Greater World Christian Spiritualist Association
The Independent African Caribbean Church of Christ of Nazareth
The Pentecostal Evangelistic Assembly
Letchworth Lodge of the Theosophical Society in England
The Holiness Church of God Inc.
The Othona Community
Trinity Church of Christ
The New Benedictine Order
The Spiritualists National Union Redwoods
Redditch Christian Fellowship
The British Sailor’s Society
Emmanuel Christian Fellowship
Highfield Free Church
Good News Church
Hammarens Ordens Sallskap—The Order of the Hammer
Apostolic Church of God Seventh Day
Mechanics
Korean Presbyterian Church
Coptic Orthodox Church
United Reformed Church
The Ashford Christian Spiritualist Church
Universal Life Church
Amazing Grace and Friends
Tavistock Community Church
Apostolics
Trinity Church of Christ
Church of England and United Reformed Church
Confucians (Buddhists, Goddess of Mercy)
Apostolic Church International (in UK)
Members of the Correllian Nativist Church International
Buddhists (New Kadampa Tradition)
Cantheist
Freedom Family Church
Redeemed Christian Church of God
C.J’s City
St. Andrews Church of God
Wiccan
Life Sanctuary Church
Kriya Yoga Ashram
Jesus Christ The Great Salvation Fellowship
Mount Sion Apostolic Church of Jesus Christ
Security: Olympic Games 2012
The Private Security Industry will play a role in delivering a safe and secure Olympic and Paralympic games. LOCOG, the London Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games, will require an estimated 6,000 people to protect their assets, protect the perimeters of their venues, screen people and vehicles entering the venues and also to work as safety stewards in the venues.
The Olympic and Paralympic Security Directorate (OSD) within the office for security and counter-terrorism (OSCT) of the Home Office is supporting an innovative project called ‘Bridging the Gap’ which aims to train up to 10,000 young adults to Security Industry Authority standards to fill these roles. The OSD is working closely with the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), LOCOG and the ‘Bridging the Gap’ project to ensure that sufficient numbers are trained and that there is a legacy for the young people in terms of job opportunities in the Private Security Industry, and other uniform services after the games. The OSD is also engaging the Private Security Industry to ensure they are aware of the challenge ahead, not just in securing the games, but also in ensuring that levels of service to businesses elsewhere in the UK are maintained.
Terrorism Act 2000
The Home Office does not hold statistics which are recorded in this way. However, the Home Office collates statistics on the number of terrorism arrests and these were included in a Bulletin published for the first time on 13 May 2009 (Statistics on Terrorism Arrests and Outcomes Great Britain 11 September 2001 to 31 March 2008). The first edition of the Bulletin is available at:
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs09/hosb0409.pdf
The second issue of the Bulletin was published on 26 November 2009 and is available via the link below:
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs09/hosb1809.pdf
UK Border Agency
Abu Dhabi is the regional operations centre for the Gulf and Pakistan, dealing with visa applications from Iran, Pakistan, Bahrain, Abu Dhabi and Dubai. Abu Dhabi will be the largest UK Border Agency operation overseas by application volume. There are 142 staff.
Abu Dhabi carries out the full range of tasks associated with visa processing, including the administration, pre-assessment and assessment of visa applications, document verification, post-decision work, including appeals, administrative reviews, correspondence and complaints handling, risk and airline liaison, integrity management, and regional management.
Under the finance model agreed with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, upon whose platform the Abu Dhabi hub operates, the budget is not constructed in a way that accounts for particular posts.
The costs passed to the UK Border Agency from the FCO are a combination of variable costs, such as those related to headcount, and fixed charges such as management support and depreciation. The variable costs paid by the UK Border Agency for 2009-10 are around £6.5 million. The fixed element for the Abu Dhabi hub cannot easily be disaggregated from the global total and to do so would incur disproportionate costs.
UK Border Agency: Empty Property
A large estate such as that occupied by the UK Border Agency is likely to have some surplus property at times, especially as it is consolidating the number of properties it has to deliver better value for the taxpayer overall. Where a property is empty the Agency is required to declare the costs associated with that property while UKBA retains the lease. In 2008-09 payments for the empty properties were £1,072 million, comprising rent, rates, and a nominal amount for utilities. This represents 1 per cent. of the cost of running the UKBA estate. Overall the agency has benefited from reduced property, IT and productivity gains from rationalisation that outweigh these costs.
Vehicle Intelligence Scheme
The purpose of the ACPO Vehicle Crime Intelligence Service (AVCIS) is to retain a strategic overview of issues affecting the UK specifically with regard to vehicle crime and vehicle enabled crime in order to maintain reductions in vehicle crime and vehicle enabled crime in the UK; improve recovery rates of stolen vehicles; and identify emerging threats and trends, developing a range of tactical options which are effective, timely and proportionate.
In order to deliver against its purpose, all the activities of AVCIS are categorised within six aims:
to reduce theft of vehicles;
to reduce theft from vehicles;
to increase recovery of stolen vehicles;
to reduce vehicle fraud;
to deliver bureau functions (including TruckPol); and
to develop AVCIS capability to deliver against its aims.
AVCIS delivers against this remit through close partnership with local police forces and regional intelligence units and national law enforcement agencies such as UKBA, SOCA and HMRC. It also works very closely with partners in the private sector, including insurers, manufacturers, vehicle tracking companies and others.
Vetting
The following table details a breakdown of the number of checks undertaken by the Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) which were the subject of a dispute since the launch of the Disclosure service in 2002. Officials at the Bureau have advised me that they have recently performed a data cleansing exercise which has resulted in some changes to the previous figures disclosed. I have been assured that this exercise has now been completed.
Error type Raised Upheld Raised Upheld Raised Upheld Raised Upheld Raised Upheld Raised Upheld Raised Upheld Raised Upheld Raised Upheld Department for education and skills and Department of children schools and families 0 0 3 3 5 5 4 3 10 8 23 15 20 12 15 11 80 57 Department of health 1 1 0 0 2 2 3 3 7 5 8 1 4 1 2 2 27 15 Identification error 0 0 2 2 0 0 3 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 Local police force 108 108 321 318 619 602 794 764 804 656 1,787 678 2,378 926 1,302 567 8,113 4619 Other (data cleansing) 569 121 1,189 151 1,280 26 1,456 38 1,467 11 89 1 13 0 11 0 6,074 348 Police national computer (PNC) 408 408 796 792 930 892 1,004 920 1,043 748 3,538 1,297 2,495 810 1,015 332 11,229 6,199 Police national computer identification 588 473 766 621 775 762 667 648 740 683 954 586 1,296 778 647 471 6,433 5,022 System error 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 Uncategorized 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 32 0 932 0 972 0 Total 1,674 1,111 3,077 1,887 3,613 2,291 3,931 2,379 4,072 2,112 6,408 2,578 6,238 2,527 3,924 1,383 32,937 16,268
Vetting: Councillors
It is the Home Office, working with other Government Departments, rather than the Independent Safeguarding Authority and the Criminal Records, which is responsible for preparing guidance on the operation of the Vetting and Barring Scheme.
The Home Office is working with the Department for Communities and Local Government and policy leads in the Department of Health/Department of Children Schools and Families to produce specific guidance on the requirements introduced by the Vetting and Barring Scheme for elected members and other local authority officials. Information on the Vetting and Barring scheme has been issued that allows individuals and organisations to assess where they fall under the scheme. This is being supplemented by comprehensive generic guidance and sector specific guidance where required. All of the guidance will be in place by July 2010.
Work and Pensions
Departmental Art Works
Works of art displayed in the Department for Work and Pensions are from the Government Art Collection (GAC), which publishes an annual list of acquisitions. The most recent details of acquisitions made by the GAC were published on 5 October 2009 and are available on the GAC website at:
http://www.gac.culture.gov.uk/information/publications.asp
Departmental Assets
The Government have stated their intention to realise £16 billion in asset disposals over the period 2011-14 and will publish further details of opportunities to commercialise business assets in the coming weeks.
One of this Department’s key investment strategies during the 2004 spending review period was to reduce asset ownership, and contract for key services. The successful implementation of that strategy resulted in a greatly reduced asset base.
The DWP does not own any land or property. Asset transfer has already been completed through a PFI contract known as PRIME, returning exchequer receipts of £250 million in 1998 and £100 million in 2003 when DWP outsourced its estate. This arrangement covers the majority of property occupied by the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (a Crown non-departmental public body). There is currently no intention to sell any of the Commission’s assets during the years in question.
Planned asset sales for the Health and Safety Executive (a Crown Non-departmental public body) are outlined in the following table:
Vechicles1 Land 2009-10 NBV 235 5 Sales 262 1 2010-11 NBV 362 10 Sales 362 10 2011-12 NBV 347 0 Sales 347 0 2012-13 NBV 277 0 Sales 277 0 2013-14 NBV 362 0 Sales 362 0 1 Vehicle sales are mainly related to the Health and Safety Executive’s Private User Scheme which provides vehicles on a three year contract for staff travelling in excess of 5,000 business miles per annum on a shared cost basis.
The DWP disposed of the majority of its vehicle fleet in August 2007. The Department’s IS/IT and telephony requirements were outsourced to EDS (now part of Hewlett Packard) and BT in 2005.
Leasehold improvements to Jobcentre Plus sites are classed as assets but cannot be disposed of independently so the impact on value is negligible, as the assets themselves (the buildings) are not owned by the Department.
Departmental Conferences
The information requested is not collated centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
The information requested is not available centrally and could be collected only at disproportionate cost.
Departmental Consultants
Where DWP contracts for consultancy support it does so primarily by reference to the outcomes or services to be delivered and not by reference to a given number of consultants. Accordingly, the Department does not hold centralised information on the number of consultants being employed on such contracts at any point in time.
Departmental Electronic Equipment
The number of plasma screen televisions purchased on behalf of the Department, including related costs, are as set out in the following table:
Number Cost (£) 2006-07 3 2,264 2007-08 9 4,725 2008-09 5 2,344 2009-10 9 2,770
Information prior to 2006-07 could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
Departmental Information and Communications Technology
The Department’s chief information officer is employed within the senior civil service pay band 3 on a permanent contract. He is responsible for a budget of £1,191 million in 2009-10.
Departmental Information Officers
The number of press officers employed by the Department in its national press office and across the English regions, Scotland and Wales for the last accounting year 2008-09 is 38. In addition to their responsibilities to the Department for Work and Pensions, they provide services for Jobcentre Plus and The Pension, Disability and Carers Service.
Departmental Legislation
The information is as follows:
The Pensions Act 2008 created the following offences:
(i) a wilful failure by an employer to comply with the duties to automatically enrol or re-enrol their employees into pension saving, or allow them to opt into pension saving. These enrolment and opt in duties are set out in sections 3(2), 5(2) and 7(3) of the Pensions Act 2008 and the offence is at section 45 of the Act;
(ii) an existing offence of providing false or misleading information (Pensions Act 2004) was amended. It now includes information which must be provided to the Pensions Regulator by employers about action they have taken or intend to take for the purposes of their duties under the Pensions Act enrolment provisions.
The Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008 created the following offences:
Sections 32D and 32K of the Child Support Act 1991 (as inserted by sections 22 and 23 of the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008) create the offences of failure to comply with the requirements of an order made under sections 32A (regular deduction order), 32E (interim lump sum deduction order) and 32F (final lump sum deduction order), these sections also contain a power to designate any regulations made under sections 32C and 32J as falling within the scope of the offence.
Section 36 of the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008 created a regulation making power to impose a duty of failing to notify a change of address on a person liable to make payments of child support maintenance. The power when exercised would set the duty out in the Child Support Information Regulations 2008. The offence is inserted into section 14A of the Child Support Act 1991.
The Welfare Reform Act 2009 created the following offences:
Section 55 of the Welfare Reform Act 2009 substitutes the provision made by section 36 of the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2009 extending the duty and the scope of the offence to include failure to notify any other change of circumstances.
Section 51 of the Welfare Reform Act 2009 inserts section 39CA into the Child Support Act 1991, to require persons against whom an order disqualifying a person from holding a driving licence or travel authorisation is made to surrender the document within a required period (seven days beginning with the start of the period for which the order has effect) and where there is good reason for not surrendering within that period, as soon as reasonably practicable after the end of that period. A person who fails to comply with this requirement commits an offence.
Departmental Manpower
The Department does not have a redeployment pool. Any members of staff who become surplus unavoidably because of organisational or other changes are managed within normal lines of management.
Departmental Official Hospitality
The information is as follows:
Alcohol
The Department does not currently keep a separate record of expenditure on alcohol for hospitality purposes. Such expenditure is included within the hospitality account. Expenditure on alcohol and entertaining is based on the principles set out in Managing Public Money and the Treasury handbook on Regularity, Propriety and Value for Money. Accordingly, alcohol is provided only as an exception and then only with the specific written authority of a small number of designated Senior Civil Servants.
Entertainment
Departmental expenditure on hospitality to the end of the financial year 2008-09 was £82,362. This is broken down as follows:
£ Jobcentre Plus 6,970 Pensions, Disability and Carers Service 11,509 Corporate 63,883 Total 82,362
The 2008-09 published accounts show expenditure on hospitality as £116,652. This figure includes expenditure incurred by the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (£5,691) and the Health and Safety Executive (£28,599) which are non-Departmental Public Bodies.
Employment Schemes: Young People
Beginning from January 2010, all jobseekers aged between 18 and 24 will have access to the Young Person’s Guarantee. As the Chancellor announced in the pre-Budget report, any young person on Jobseeker’s Allowance for six months or more will now be guaranteed an offer of a job, work-focussed training or work experience.
In Flexible New Deal Phase One areas, young people will be offered a place on the Young Person’s Guarantee after six months of unemployment, and will be referred to the Flexible New Deal when they reach 12 months of unemployment.
In Flexible New Deal Phase Two areas, the New Deal for Young People will continue to run until the Flexible New Deal goes live in October 2010. In these areas, young people will also be offered a place on the Young Person’s Guarantee from six months, the only difference being that if they choose to take up training or a work experience place these will be delivered through the New Deal options.
The information on the number of people who will be participating is not available, as we do not project unemployment figures.
Housing Benefit
The Department does not hold information on local authorities' expenditure on housing benefit administration.
Such information as is available for local authorities in England is a matter for my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; in Scotland it is a matter for the Scottish Parliament; and in Wales it is a matter for the National Assembly for Wales.
Jobseeker's Allowance
(2) how long on average it took to process a claim for jobseeker's allowance in each (a) region and (b) Jobcentre Plus district in each month since February 2009; how many unprocessed jobseeker's allowance claims there were in (i) total and (ii) each region in each month since February 2009; and if she will make a statement.
The administration of Jobcentre Plus is a matter for the chief executive of Jobcentre Plus, Darra Singh. I have asked him to provide the hon. Member with the information requested.
Letter from Darra Singh:
The Secretary of State has asked me to reply to your questions asking how many and what proportion of jobseeker's allowance (JSA) claims were not processed (a) within the Jobcentre Plus target time and (b) within the national average time in each (i) Jobcentre Plus district and (ii) region in each of the last 12 months; and if she will make a statement and how long on average it took to process a claim for JSA in each (a) region and (b) Jobcentre Plus district in each month since February 2009; how many unprocessed jobseeker's allowance claims there were in (i) total and (ii) each region in each month since February 2009; and if she will make a statement. This is something which falls within the responsibilities delegated to me as Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus.
Information is not available down to District level as JSA claims are processed at our Benefit Delivery Centres. The Management Information supplied will be for each Benefit Delivery Centre and Region.
Jobcentre Plus gathers information on the volume of outstanding claims from its internal benefit processing systems. As claims are received in Benefit Delivery Centres they are recorded on this system. The count of outstanding claims is a snap shot, of which claims have yet to be fully processed to the point a decision is made on entitlement, on the last working day of every month. The data provided may also slightly under estimate the volume of claims outstanding as some cases could be in transit and/or be waiting to be logged onto the system.
Jobcentre Plus has a target for the average actual clearance time taken to process JSA claims. The current target is 11.5 days. This time is calculated across an average of all the claims cleared in any given month looking at the date the customer first contacted Jobcentre Plus or the customers first day of unemployment, whichever is the later. The end date is the date a formal decision is made on the claim and a notification is issued to the customer on entitlement.
Jobcentre Plus does not hold information on what volume or proportion of JSA claims were not processed within the Jobcentre Plus target time (11.5 days) and within the national average time (10.1 days, Year to 31.10.09). However, it does hold information on the volume of claims that were processed within 0-5 days, 0-10 days, 0-16 days, and 0-21 days. Jobcentre Plus's Management Information systems do not hold information on proportions—these would need to be clerically calculated from the information provided.
The information that is available to answer your first question has been placed in the Library.
Information on average clearance times for JSA claims and volumes of outstanding claims for the period from February to April 2009 for each Benefit Delivery Centre and Region has been placed in the Library. Information on average clearance times for JSA claims and volumes of outstanding claims for the period from May to October 2009 was placed in the Library on 27 November 2009 in answer to your question: how many unprocessed JSA claims there were in each (a) region and (b) Jobcentre Plus district in each of the last six months; what the average time taken to process claims in each instance was (PQ 300684).
Local Housing Allowance
On 7 December 2009 the pre-Budget report announced that the Government had decided not to implement the withdrawal of the £15 excess in April 2010.
The Government are considering all aspects of the local housing allowance alongside its wider strategy for housing benefit reform in its consultation document “Supporting People in to Work: The Next Stage of Housing Benefit Reform”. Our proposals will ensure that housing benefit is better able to help people into work, is fairer, more efficiently delivered and represents good value for money for the taxpayer.
National Insurance
The available information is in the table:
Quarter 1 April-June Quarter 2 July-September Quarter 3 October-December Quarter 4 January-March Total 2006-07 — 825 968 1,801 3,594 2007-08 1,936 1,902 1,638 1,643 7,119 2008-09 1,562 2,526 3,106 2,668 9,862 2009-10 2,641 n/a n/a n/a 2,641 “—” Indicates no data available as the period was before the introduction of the right to work test. n/a = Not yet available. Note: The right to work test was introduced in July 2006 Source: Jobcentre Plus Management Information
New Deal Schemes
The New Deal Gateway to Work programme is a component of both the New Deal for Young People and the New Deal 25 Plus.
The cost of the New Deal Gateway to Work programme in the 12 months to March 2009 for the 18 to 24-year-old client group was £41.4 million.
For the age 25-plus client group, it is not possible to identify the costs of the New Deal Gateway to Work programme separately from other types of provision undertaken during the gateway period. This is because expenditure on this provision is not recorded separately from other provisions. The total cost of all gateway provision for the 25 plus year old client group was £15.8 million in the 12 months to March 2009.
The following table sets out the number of participants who have started on the Gateway to Work provision for each year since inception.
Financial year New Deal for Young People New Deal 25 Plus Combined New Deal for Young People and New Deal 25 Plus 2001-02 44,990 3,480 48,470 2002-03 51,730 7,430 59,160 2003-04 50,410 11,730 62,140 2004-05 43,470 12,470 55,940 2005-06 49,710 8,190 57,900 2006-07 60,310 6,900 67,210 2007-08 58,140 13,910 72,050 2008-09 67,800 13,860 81,660 Notes: 1. Figures rounded to the nearest 10. 2. The Gateway to Work course was introduced to New Deal for Young People in July 2000, so the first full year data is for 2001-02. 3. A pilot in a number of Districts for New Deal 25 Plus ended in March 2006, followed by optional use nationally. Source: Department for Work and Pensions, Information Directorate
Social Security Benefits
If a customer is not entitled to an income-related benefit due to excess capital a decision notice will be issued to the customer that includes reasons for the disallowance and details of their right to a reconsideration of the decision and, where appropriate, to an appeal. Customers are also informed that they will need to reapply if their circumstances change, in order for eligibility to be reassessed. No specific advice is given as to the future rundown of capital in these cases. This is because subsequent decisions on whether deprivations have occurred are a matter of judgement by independent decision makers.
If it is established that the customer has deliberately deprived themselves of capital in order to obtain income- related benefits, the customer will be treated as still possessing that capital when assessing entitlement to benefit. Their claim will be subject to a calculation to determine at what point this notional capital would have been expected to reduce below the capital limit and so enable the customer to make a new claim. The calculation is based on the prevailing benefit rates. The customer will be given details of the calculation in their case, together with the rights of review and, where appropriate, appeal.
Social Security Benefits: Grandparents
I refer the hon. Member to the written answer given to the hon. Member for Birmingham, Northfield (Richard Burden) on 15 December 2009, Official Report, columns 1009-10W.
Work Capability Assessment
[holding answer 6 January 2010]: We are currently reviewing the work capability assessment with the help of a range of stakeholders and medical professionals. We believe there are some changes that could be made and plan to publish a report detailing these once the review is complete.
Women and Equality
Departmental Cost Effectiveness
The Government Equalities Office is outside the remit of the Operational Efficiency Programme as it employs less than 250 people.
Departmental Domestic Visits
The Ministers for Women and Equality have made the following visits since November 2008.
Visits made Minister for Women and Equality (Harriet Harman) 3 Deputy Minister for Women and Equality (Maria Eagle) 0 Parliamentary Secretary (Michael Jabez Foster) 1 Solicitor-General and Equality Bill Lead (Vera Baird) 1
Visits made Minister for Women and Equality (Harriet Harman) 1 Deputy Minister for Women (Maria Eagle) 1 Parliamentary Secretary (Michael Jabez Foster) 2 Solicitor-General and Equality Bill Lead (Vera Baird) 0
(c) Northern Ireland
None. Equality is a devolved matter for the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Departmental Electronic Equipment
Justice
Council Tax: Non-payment
(2) what assessment he has made of the reason for the increase in applications for liability orders.
The table shows the number of applications for council tax and business rate liability orders made within each accounting centre in 2008-09.
The figures have been extracted from the intranet fees accounting system (IFAS). Fee income and volume are captured by accounting centres in IFAS. Some accounting centres comprise of more than one magistrates court. However, some of these accounting centres merge the management information which means it is not possible to supply data at individual court level.
Applications for liability orders attract the same fee charge, and are therefore recorded on the IFAS in the same way. It is not therefore possible to distinguish between applications for liability orders made in relation to council tax and business rates.
The overall number of applications made in 2008-09 as shown (3,121,089) is marginally different from my answer (3,124,406) to the hon. Member for North-West Norfolk (Mr. Bellingham) of 18 May 2009, Official Report, columns 1214-1215W. The latter figure was extracted from the IFAS database at the time the hon. Member for North-West Norfolk tabled his question, but in order to obtain a breakdown by accounting centre, data have been re-extracted from the IFAS. The IFAS is a “live” database, meaning that, inevitably, the normal course of regular system updating means that various additions, deletions, amendments and corrections will have been made to the data it contains relating to applications in 2008-09, giving rise to the marginal difference.
Enforcement action in respect of non-payment of council tax is entirely a matter for local authorities. The Ministry of Justice has made no assessment of the reasons behind the increase in council tax liability orders.
Accounting centre Number City of London Magistrates 1,525 Horseferry Road Magistrates 26,826 Bexley Magistrates 7,035 Bromley Magistrates 8,957 Camberwell Green Magistrates 81,412 Croydon Magistrates 20,786 Greenwich Magistrates 29,837 Kingston-upon-Thames Magistrates 6,855 Richmond-upon-Thames Magistrates 9,141 London—West Group Magistrates 82,726 Wimbledon Magistrates 21,182 South Western Magistrates 15,935 London North East Area Magistrates 133,815 Barnet Magistrates 7,160 Hendon Magistrates 16,333 Brent Magistrates 29,010 Enfield Magistrates 19,585 Harrow Magistrates 5,854 Highbury Corner Magistrates 48,092 Haringey Magistrates 16,453 Uxbridge Magistrates 13,569 Bedfordshire Magistrates 47,465 Cambridgeshire Magistrates 27,536 Essex Magistrates—Civil 80,578 Hertfordshire Central Accounting Unit 21,905 Kent Central Finance Unit—East Kent Magistrates— Finance Centre 25,575 Kent Central Finance Unit—North and Central Kent Magistrates 50,728 Norfolk Magistrates 41,269 Suffolk Magistrates Court 37,912 Surrey Magistrates—Central Finance Unit 35,381 Sussex Magistrates 80,870 Central Buckinghamshire Magistrates—Aylesbury 34,828 Oxfordshire Magistrates 27,277 Berkshire Magistrates—Reading 42,763 Bath Magistrates 3,452 Bristol Magistrates 24,733 Taunton Magistrates 7,442 North Somerset Magistrates 12,840 North Avon Magistrates—Yate 9,041 South Somerset Magistrate 9,491 Devon and Cornwall—North Devon Magistrates 3,583 Devon and Cornwall—East Cornwall Magistrates 14,924 Devon and Cornwall—West Cornwall Magistrates 9,428 Devon and Cornwall—Central Devon Magistrates 9,413 Devon and Cornwall—South Devon Magistrates 11,057 Devon and Cornwall—Plymouth District Magistrates 18,183 Dorset Magistrates—Central Finance Office 41,821 Gloucestershire Magistrates—Central Finance Office 27,696 Wiltshire—Swindon Magistrates 25,667 Hampshire and Isle of Wight—North East and North West Hampshire Magistrates 17,059 Hampshire and Isle of Wight—South West Hampshire Magistrates 33,025 Hampshire and Isle of Wight—South and South East Hampshire Magistrates 35,065 Hampshire and Isle of Wight—Isle of Wight (IOW) Magistrates 7,750 Gwent Magistrates 33,176 North Wales Magistrates—Central Finance Office, Denbigh 34,330 South Wales Area 1—Central Finance Unit Unisys 65,349 Dyfed Powys Magistrates 24,629 High Peak 4,304 North East Derbyshire and Dales Magistrates 15,812 Southern Derbyshire Magistrates 33,969 Leicester Magistrates 26,165 Loughborough Magistrates 28,239 Lincolnshire Magistrates 24,162 Northamptonshire Magistrates 32,771 Mansfield (Rosemary St.) Magistrates 9,110 Newark Magistrates 4,431 Nottingham Magistrates 44,782 Worksop Magistrates 7,432 Staffordshire Magistrates 67,958 Walsall Magistrates 17,582 Sandwell Magistrates 10,191 Wolverhampton Magistrates Court 18,932 Dudley and Halesowen Magistrates 17,329 Warwickshire Magistrates 20,059 West Mercia Magistrates 37,309 Birmingham (VLC) Magistrates—(Corporation St.) 77,568 Coventry Magistrates 18,697 Solihull Magistrates 10,472 Sutton Coldfield Magistrates 1,120 Cumbria Magistrates—Central Payments Unit 24,066 Bolton Magistrates 19,831 Bury Magistrates 11,006 Manchester Magistrates 66,085 Oldham Magistrates 18,837 Rochdale Magistrates 20,926 Salford Magistrates 9,870 Stockport Magistrates 22,185 Tameside Magistrates 334 Trafford Magistrates 17,966 Wigan and Leigh Magistrates 20,180 East Lancashire Magistrates—Blackburn 19,838 Fylde Coast Magistrates—Blackpool 24,617 Pennine Magistrates—Burnley 20,514 South West Lancashire Magistrates—Chorley 8,847 Preston and Lancaster Magistrates 16,978 Knowsley Magistrates 11,472 Liverpool Magistrates 62,608 St. Helens Magistrates 9,786 Cheshire Accounting Division1 34,811 Cleveland Magistrates 44,277 Durham Magistrates 41,219 Humber—East Yorkshire Magistrates—Beverley 34,182 Humber—North Lincolnshire Magistrates—Scunthorpe and Grimsby Central Finance Unit 12,564 Humber—North Lincolnshire Magistrates—Scunthorpe and Grimsby Central Finance Unit 9,064 North Yorkshire Magistrates 18,762 Northumbria Magistrates 106,822 South Yorkshire Magistrates 104,221 West Yorkshire Magistrates 145,498 Total England and Wales 3,121,089 1 Was North, South and West pre 1 July 2009 Source: Intranet Fees Accounting System
Crimes Against Humanity: Jurisdiction
The offence of crimes against humanity is found in the International Criminal Court Act 2001. It covers crimes committed in England and Wales and Northern Ireland by any person and crimes committed outside the UK by UK nationals, persons subject to UK service jurisdiction and UK residents (including persons who subsequently become resident in the UK).
The Government have no plans to restrict this jurisdiction of the UK courts for crimes against humanity.
Debt Collection
Credit card judgment debts are treated as any other civil judgment debt for the purposes of enforcement, subject to any challenges the debtor makes in respect of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (as amended by Consumer Credit Act 2006). However consumer credit debts remain in the county court for execution and they cannot be transferred up to the High Court for enforcement by a High Court enforcement officer as a normal county court judgment can.
Departmental Billing
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is fully committed to achieving compliance with the Prime Minister's target of paying suppliers within 10 days, and is a signatory to the Prompt Payment Code. The MoJ has been collecting prompt payment data since November 2008 and the number and proportion of invoices paid within 10 days is shown in the following table.
Period name Total MoJ invoices paid in month MoJ prompt invoices as percentage Number of invoices paid in 10 days 2008 November 98,917 64 63,307 December 99,565 59 58,743 2009 January 104,870 55 57,679 February 101,035 67 67,693 March 124,418 66 82,116 April 79,783 82 65,422 May 66,807 92 61,462 June 83,154 88 73,541 July 81,379 89 72,427 August 71,723 88 63,116 September 93,244 92 85,784 October 99,820 92 91,834 November 99,248 93 92,301
Departmental Conferences
This information is not held centrally and could be provided only by manually collecting the data from each division within the Ministry of Justice at a disproportionate cost. Expenditure on conferences must be incurred in accordance with the principles of the Treasury publications Managing Public Money and Regularity, Propriety and Value for Money.
Departmental Legislation
The Ministry of Justice has been responsible for 237 statutory instruments since May 2008. The number of offences which these created and abolished can be established only at disproportionate cost since a manual trawl of the legislation would be required.
Driving Offences: Disqualification
The Chairman of the Road Traffic Committee of the Magistrates’ Association corresponded in 2009 with Ministers on the subject of sentencing for the offence of driving while disqualified.
Drugs: East Sussex
The number of defendants proceeded against at magistrates courts and found guilty at all courts in the Sussex police force area for drug offences, from 2000 to 2007 (latest available) can be viewed in the following table.
Information held centrally cannot be broken down sufficiently to supply data for East Sussex, therefore Sussex police force area data have been provided in lieu.
Data for 2008 are planned for publication on 28 January 2010.
Proceeded against Found guilty 2000 1,009 818 2001 1,306 1,081 2002 1,383 1,179 2003 1,164 1,075 2004 974 861 2005 1,162 1,026 2006 1,166 1,013 2007 1,317 1,141 1 The statistics relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences the principal offence is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe. 2 Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. Source: Justice Statistics Analytical Services—Ministry of Justice.
Insider Trading: Convictions
The number of persons found guilty at all courts in England and Wales for offences under the Criminal Justice Act 1993 and the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 from 2005 to 2007 (latest available) can be viewed in the following table.
Data for 2008 are planned for publication on 28 January 2010.
Offence description Statute 2005 2006 2007 Insider dealing Criminal Justice Act 1993, Sec 52 4 2 6 Disclosure, obstruction making false or misleading statements etc Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, Secs 346, 351, 352, 397 and 398; Sch 4 1 2 3 1 The statistics relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. W hen a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences the principal offence is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe. 2 Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. Source: Justice Statistics Analytical Services—Ministry of Justice
Iraq Committee of Inquiry
I refer the hon. Lady to the reply given by my right hon. Friend the Minister of State for the Cabinet Office (Angela E. Smith) on 14 December 2009, Official Report, columns 840-41W. The Ministry of Justice is in the process of providing the Iraq Inquiry with all the documents and electronic information it holds which has been requested to date. This information spans every level of Government security classification.
Jamie Douglas
I will write to my hon. Friend shortly with details of this case.
Legal Advice and Assistance
The Legal Services Commission chose the period April 2009 to August 2009 as this was the most up to date information available from legal aid providers when a review was undertaken in September 2009.
Legal Aid: Finance
(2) if he will publish the responses to the consultation paper 18/09 on legal aid funding reforms; and when he plans to announce his decisions on policy changes to be made in the light of the consultation responses.
I refer the hon. Member to my written ministerial statement of 16 December 2009, Official Report, column 141WS, in which my noble Friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Lord Bach) announced the publication of a partial response to the consultation on Legal Aid Funding Reforms.
A total of 435 responses were received. There are no plans to publish the responses to the consultation. A copy of the consultation response and accompanying impact assessment has been placed in the House Library. A response to the proposals in relation to experts fees will be published in the new year. The documents are also available on the consultation section of the Ministry of Justice website at:
www.justice.gsi.gov.uk
Mentally Disturbed Offenders
Prisoners may be detained in hospital under powers of the Mental Health Act 1983, either if directed to hospital by the court on sentencing or if directed by the Secretary of State during their sentence. They may also be remitted to prison during sentence. On 17 December 2009, Ministry of Justice records showed 113 prisoners in hospital under powers of the 1983 Act, who were also serving indeterminate sentences of imprisonment for public protection.
Prison Accommodation
Directors of offender management must ensure that each cell used for the confinement of prisoners has sufficient heating, lighting and ventilation and is of adequate size for the number or prisoners it is approved for. Each such cell is recorded on a prison’s cell certificate.
Not all accommodation recorded on a prison’s cell certificate is part of its certified normal accommodation and in the vast majority of cases will also not form part of its operational capacity. This is due to a range of operational reasons, which include those cells that are part of segregation units (where prisoners should only be held under a governor’s express authority), cells in in-patient health care centres (which are only suitable for prisoners with relevant health needs) and holding cells in prison receptions (which are not suitable for holding prisoners overnight).
As of 14 December 2009, based on information from central records, about 2,712 places were not included in the certified normal accommodation (or uncrowded capacity) of the prison estate. This equates to an average of 19 cells per prison.
These figures have been drawn from central administrative/recording systems, which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.
Prisoners Release
Early release on compassionate grounds should only be permitted in the most exceptional circumstances and where the risk of reoffending is past. It is right, therefore, to apply stringent criteria. Prisoners with a terminal illness can receive the appropriate care and treatment while in custody and we believe that early release from their sentence should only be considered in the final stages or where they become too ill to remain in prison. The criteria applied in medical circumstances state:
“the prisoner is suffering from a terminal illness and death is likely to occur soon; or the prisoner is bedridden or similarly incapacitated”.
The three-month period is suggested as a guide for the sort of life expectancy that should be taken into consideration when applying the criteria but is just one of a number of factors that are taken into account.
Adult offenders serving a sentence of 12 months or more and all young offenders under 22 years of age are, upon release, subject to supervision by the probation services.
These figures are published annually in Offender Management Caseload Statistics (OMCS). Copies are in the House of Commons Libraries and on the MOJ website at:
http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/prisonandprobation.htm
The following table shows the number of discharges from determinate sentences from prisons in England and Wales. The figures are the sum of adult prisoners released from sentences of 12 months or more (including indeterminate sentences) and all young offender releases.
Prisoners released 2004 42,000 2005 42,000 2006 40,400 2007 42,700 2008 45,600
Data for 2009 will be available in the OMCS 2009 which will be published in July 2010.
Prisoners released on temporary licence remain the responsibility of the prison during the period of temporary release. However, where prisoners are liable to supervision on their normal release date but are released early under the End of Custody Licence scheme, they are required to meet their probation officer during the ECL licence period and to have regular contact after that in line with their supervision programme.
The number of ECL releases for those prisoners serving sentences of 12 months or more and less than four years for the year 2007 and 2008 was 2,941 and 5,643. Data for 2007 are based on the period from 29 June, when the scheme started, to 31 December.
All figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.
Prisoners: Body Searches
In February 2009 the National Offender Management Service introduced new full search arrangements aimed at reducing the frequency of full searches by a more intelligence-led approach for all females detained within prisons in England. The new arrangements do not require the removal of underwear unless there is intelligence or suspicion at any stage that an item is concealed. The arrangements are kept under constant review, and a full assessment completed in August achieved a positive outcome. A further detailed assessment will be conducted early in spring 2010.
Prisoners: Location
Table A shows the average travelling distance from home in miles of remand and sentenced prisoners held in HMPs accommodation by gender. Data prior to 2006 are not available in the format requested.
All prisoners are asked for details of their home address on first reception to prison and on discharge from prison. Approximately 60 per cent. of prisoners (both male and female) are shown to have given a recognised address.
If no address is given, various proxies are used to determine distance from home, including next-of-kin address and committal court address.
Adult (21+) Young offender (18 to 20) Juvenile (15 to 17) Month Male Female Male Female Male Female September 2006 49 58 48 57 56 63 September 2007 50 59 49 50 55 71 September 08 50 57 50 53 52 55 May 2009 50 55 49 51 51 55
Table B shows the average distance from home in miles for remand and sentenced young people in .secure children’s homes and secure training centres from 2001 to 2009 by gender. Data prior to 2001 are not available in the format requested.
Home area is taken as a young person’s address at the time of sentence. If no address is recorded, the address of the Youth Offending Team that the young person is attached to is used as a proxy.
Table B Male Female 2001 59 75 2002 59 61 2003 56 61 2004 56 69 2005 52 63 2006 48 61 2007 54 68 2008 52 59 2009 47 52
Prisoners: Mothers
There are seven mother and baby units (MBUs) in England providing an overall capacity of 75 places. Each unit can normally accommodate one set of twins. However, the number of places available at any one time can fluctuate for operational reasons, and currently stands at 69. The following table lists each prison with an MBU and the current capacity.
Establishment MBU capacity Askham Grange 10 Bronzefield 12 Eastwood Park 12 Holloway 13 New Hall 3 Peterborough 12 Styal 7 Total 69
Prisoners: Voting Rights
(2) how many respondents to the second round of consultation on voting rights for prisoners were convicted prisoners.
The second stage consultation on the voting rights of convicted prisoners closed on 29 September. A detailed analysis of the replies to the second stage consultation—including a breakdown of respondents—will be available upon publication of the Government's response. There have been over 100 responses to the consultation from a number of different groups including charities, local authorities, members of the public and prisoners, which we are currently considering carefully.
Prisons: Overcrowding
The average number of prisoners in overcrowded accommodation in each prison for the period April to October 2009 is provided in the following table.
Establishment name Average number of prisoners held in overcrowded conditions: April to October 2009 Acklington 0 Albany 0 Altcourse 891 Ashfield 0 Ashwell 27 Askham Grange 0 Aylesbury 0 Bedford 293 Belmarsh 372 Birmingham 640 Blantyre House 0 Blundeston 127 Brinsford 35 Bristol 162 Brixton 228 Bronzefield 0 Buckley Hall 67 Bullingdon 423 Bullwood Hall 17 Bure 0 Camp Hill 148 Canterbury 211 Cardiff 530 Castington 2 Channings Wood 32 Chelmsford 233 Coldingley 24 Cookham Wood 0 Dartmoor 46 Deerbolt 0 Doncaster 761 Dorchester 166 Dovegate 95 Dover 0 Downview 0 Drake Hall 0 Durham 708 East Sutton Park 0 Eastwood Park 46 Edmunds Hill 0 Elmley 403 Erlestoke 0 Everthorpe 151 Exeter 409 Featherstone 23 Feltham 0 Ford 0 Forest Bank 666 Foston Hall 0 Frankland 0 Full Sutton 0 Garth 32 Gartree 0 Glen Parva 413 Gloucester 145 Grendon 0 Guys Marsh 86 Haslar 0 Haverigg 25 Hewell 377 High Down 234 Highpoint 43 Hindley 0 Hollesley Bay 0 Holloway 0 Holme House 263 Hull 578 Huntercombe 0 Kennet 321 Kingston 0 Kirkham 0 Kirklevington 0 Lancaster 155 Lancaster Farms 83 Latchmere House 0 Leeds 608 Leicester 305 Lewes 136 Leyhill 0 Lincoln 469 Lindholme 79 Littlehey 123 Liverpool 349 Long Lartin 0 Low Newton 50 Lowdham Grange 89 Maidstone 55 Manchester 651 Moorland 77 Morton Hall 0 Mount 31 New Hall 55 North Sea Camp 2 Northallerton 165 Norwich 193 Nottingham 335 Onley 0 Parc 315 Parkhurst 35 Pentonville 533 Peterborough 216 Portland 0 Preston 638 Ranby 236 Reading 123 Risley 65 Rochester 0 Rye Hill 0 Send 0 Shepton Mallet 47 Shrewsbury 226 Stafford 0 Standford Hill 0 Stocken 69 Stoke Heath 133 Styal 20 Sudbury 0 Swaleside 95 Swansea 323 Swinfen Hall 26 Thorn Cross 0 Usk\Prescoed 241 Verne 62 Wakefield 0 Wandsworth 1,095 Warren Hill 0 Wayland 91 Wealstun 38 Wellingborough 2 Werrington 0 Wetherby 0 Whatton 67 Whitemoor 0 Winchester 420 Wolds 101 Woodhill 353 Wormwood Scrubs 124 Wymott 104
Probation Service: Disabled
(2) how many staff of the Probation Service in England and Wales who have been diagnosed with a disability are currently subject to stage (a) 1, (b) 2 and (c) 3 of the formal sickness attendance process.
Information about the reasons for dismissal or about individuals subject to the various stages of the formal sickness attendance process is not collated centrally as this is a local probation area management issue.
It is not possible to obtain the required information without incurring disproportionate costs as it would entail each of the 42 probation boards/trusts to collate and compile the information. This would then have to be submitted to the centre for further collation and presentation.
Radicalism: Crime Prevention
(2) how many units within his Department have responsibility to tackle extremism by developing interventions and programmes for extremist offenders.
There are two units within the National Offender Management Service developing interventions and programmes for extremist offenders who work closely together:
National Offender Management Service (NOMS) Interventions and Substance Misuse Group (ISMG)
This unit, which is funded by the Home Office, is made up of four full-time and one part-time staff and is managed by a senior principal chartered forensic psychologist.
NOMS Chaplaincy HQ
The NOMS Chaplaincy HQ has set up a sub-committee (made up of eight part-time staff, and with oversight from the NOMS ISMG) for designing a faith-based intervention for tackling those offenders who may be vulnerable to extremism.
Reoffenders
Table 1 contains the one year reoffending rates for offenders aged under 18 who were discharged from custody in the first quarter of each year for which data are available.
Cohort Number of offenders Rate of reoffending Number of offences per 100 offenders 2000 Q1 912 75.7 482.1 2002 Q1 959 72.9 465.9 2003 Q1 786 73.8 442.5 2004 Q1 815 76.4 414.8 2005 Q1 844 73.1 409.5 2006 Q1 817 77.0 404.0 2007 Q1 778 75.3 359.0
Table 2 contains the one year reoffending rates for adult offenders aged 18 to 21, and 22 and over, who were discharged from custody in the first quarter of each year for which data are available.
Age Cohort Number of offenders Rate of reoffending Number of offences per 100 offenders 18-21 2000 Q1 3,653 63.9 333.0 2002 Q1 3,369 63.7 349.5 2003 Q1 2,985 61.9 334.9 2004 Q1 2,980 58.8 301.8 2005 Q1 2,682 56.5 266.8 2006 Q1 2,500 53.8 243.0 2007 Q1 2,285 56.2 267.7 22 and over 2000 Q1 12,064 47.6 219.1 2002 Q1 12,196 52.6 271.2 2003 Q1 11,361 51.8 264.4 2004 Q1 12,769 50.3 241.7 2005 Q1 11,897 47.4 219.9 2006 Q1 11,864 44.9 201.1 2007 Q1 10,525 45.3 213.5
Note:
Reoffending data are not available for 2001 due to a problem with archived data on court orders. Since it will not substantially increase the knowledge on the current progress on reoffending, no resources have been allocated to fix this problem.
More information on the reoffending rates is available from the Ministry of Justice website.
Adult reoffending:
http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/reoffendingofadults.htm
Juvenile reoffending:
http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/reoffendingjuveniles.htm
Sentencing: Greater London
(2) how many young people received a (a) reprimand, (b) final warning and (c) penalty notice for disorder following a court appearance in each London local authority in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement.
Cautions, cannabis warnings, reprimands, warnings, and penalty notices for disorder are out of court disposals issued by the police, authorised persons and the Crown Prosecution Service to deal proportionately with less serious offences which do not merit prosecution at court. Data reported centrally on the number of cautions, cannabis warnings, reprimands, warnings or penalty notices for disorder issued do not identify if an offender has previously appeared in court.
The number of persons receiving a caution, reprimand or warning, or given a penalty notice for disorder, in Greater London, by age group, from 2003 to 2007 (latest available) is given in table 1 as follows. Currently, data on simple or conditional cautions are not published separately although the Crown Prosecution Service is planning to publish conditional cautioning data on a monthly basis from February 2010.
Cautions and court proceedings data are not available at local authority level therefore information is given in the table for Greater London (includes the Metropolitan and the City of London police force areas).
Cautions, penalty notices for disorder, and court proceedings data for 2008 are planned for publication on 28 January 2010.
Since 2004 the police may issue an adult offender with a cannabis warning for simple possession of cannabis (prior to 2006 referred to as a “street warning”), in accordance with guidance issued by the Association of Chief Police Officers for England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Home Office Statisticians advise that an offence can be shown as detected once the police have issued a cannabis warning. The data collected centrally relate to the number of offences of cannabis possession detected by means of a cannabis warning and may not be the same as the number of cannabis warnings issued to offenders. Information on the number of cannabis warnings recorded by the police as method of detection for possession of cannabis offences for the London region from 2004-05 to 2008-09 can be viewed in table 2 as follows.
Cautioned Penalty notice for disorder (PNDs)6 Total cautioned7 Aged 10 to 17 reprimand Aged 10 to 17 warning Aged 18 or over cautioned Total PNDs Aged 16 and 17 Aged 18 and over 2003 32,297 6,248 3,313 22,736 1— 1— 1— 2004 32,433 6,851 4,128 21,454 12,818 342 12,476 2005 35,959 7,180 3,880 24,899 18,266 888 17,378 2006 44,694 8,577 4,282 31,835 21,172 1,192 19,980 2007 49,706 8,587 4,600 36,519 25,070 1,306 23,764 1 Not applicable. 2 Includes Metropolitan police force area and City of London police force area. 3 From 1 June 2000 the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 came into force nationally and removed the use of cautions for persons under 18 and replaced them with reprimands and warnings. 4 The cautions, reprimand and warning statistics relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When an offender has been cautioned, reprimanded or received a warning for two or more offences at the same time the principal offence is the more serious offence. 5 Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. 6 The Penalty Notice for Disorder Scheme was implemented in all 43 police forces in England and Wales in 2004 under the provisions of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001. 7 Includes Reprimands and Warnings. Source: Justice Statistics Analytical Services.
Police force area 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-092 London region 13,665 21,722 30,927 47,415 47,710 1 Comprises City of London Police and Metropolitan Police. 2 Since 26 January 2009, Penalty Notices for Disorder (PNDs) can be given for cannabis possession. Up to the end of March 2009 such PNDs were counted together with cannabis warnings. Source: Home Office Statistics.
Victim Support Schemes: Lancashire
Prior to 2001 records of specific allocation of how Victim Support decided to allocate Government funding, broken down into areas is not available. The following table gives the detail of the allocation of Government funding to Lancashire from 2001 to date.
Total Government funding to victim support (£ million) Funding allocated to Lancashire 1996-97 11.68 n/a 1997-98 12.68 n/a 1998-99 12.68 n/a 1999-2000 17.5 n/a 2000-01 18.6 n/a 2001-02 25.1 724,010 2002-03 29.3 580,325 2003-04 30 685,263 2004-05 30 640,119 2005-06 30 671,248 2006-07 30 667,785 2007-08 35.8 707,646 2008-09 37 794,296 n/a = Not available.
Young Offender Institutions
The following table sets out the number of young women (aged 17) held in young offender institutions on 30 October 2009, and the average annual cost per place at each.
The data have been supplied by the Youth Justice Board and have been drawn from administrative IT systems, which, as with any large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing and may be subject to change over time.
Establishment Number of young women held Annual cost per place 2009-10 (£000) Josephine Butler Unit, Downview YOI 15 125 Mary Carpenter Unit, Eastwood Park YOI 15 133 Rivendell Unit, New Hall YOI 18 136 Toscana Unit, Foston Hall YOI 15 102
Each young offender institution (YOI) has an offender management team that which oversees resettlement issues and fulfils the establishment’s obligations in this regard. The size and composition of the team will depend on a number of factors including the role of the YOI and the size of the population.
There are currently 22.5 social worker posts in YOIs and dedicated units for young women in England and Wales. Eleven and a half of these posts are vacant.
Young Offenders: Females
The following table gives the numbers of females aged under 18 years in custody in all prison establishments (a) on remand and (b) under sentence in England and Wales in each month between June 2006 and June 2009:
On remand Under sentence Total 2009 June 12 42 54 May 15 44 59 April 10 37 47 March 13 34 47 February 12 34 46 January 15 36 51 2008 December 15 40 55 November 18 50 68 October 13 59 72 September 17 56 73 August 16 48 64 July 17 53 70 June 14 57 71 May 13 56 69 April 17 50 67 March 14 44 58 February 22 43 65 January 20 43 63 2007 December 15 45 60 November 20 44 64 October 19 50 69 September 15 53 68 August 21 58 79 July 18 60 78 June 19 56 75 May 23 58 81 April 18 43 61 March 17 55 72 February 21 50 71 January 24 42 66 2006 December 16 42 58 November 16 50 66 October 19 49 68 September 21 49 70 August 29 48 77 July 21 46 67 June 19 50 69
This information is available from the Ministry of Justice monthly briefing at the following website:
http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/populationincustody.htm
The following table shows numbers of females aged under 18 years in custody at the end of each month since October 2006 in Secure Children's Homes and Secure Training Centres in England and Wales.
On Remand Under sentence Total 2009 October 12 83 95 September 11 79 90 August 13 100 113 July 16 96 112 June 12 99 111 May 16 86 102 April 16 95 111 March 20 96 116 February 14 94 108 January 18 102 120 2008 December 15 86 101 November 20 110 130 October 14 112 126 September 11 98 109 August 19 109 128 July 22 113 135 June 14 131 145 May 22 113 135 April 35 101 136 March 24 108 132 February 23 104 127 January 20 99 119 2007 December 17 126 143 November 19 133 152 October 19 135 154 September 16 144 160 August 16 149 165 July 23 138 161 June 15 128 143 May 18 108 126 April 16 112 128 March 17 121 138 February 26 111 137 January 18 111 129 2006 December 14 115 129 November 19 114 133 October 13 105 118
These figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.
Young Offenders: Rehabilitation
The Young People’s Substance Misuse Service delivers services in all under-18 young offender institutions including the four special units for 17-year-old girls. All young people entering a young offender institution are assessed for substance misuse needs and an appropriate care pathway is developed, specific to the young person’s individual needs. Staff at all establishments are able to access NHS facilities or provide appropriate medical treatment.
The health care service provided to young people in secure training centres includes the assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of physical and mental disorders, including addiction to drugs, alcohol, smoking and other intoxicating substances. All young people entering an STC are assessed by health care staff and have access to NHS facilities and specialists when clinically required.
Young Offenders: Reoffenders
Reoffending data are based on offences committed within one year of an offenders’ release from custody. Reoffending data covering longer time periods are not collated and therefore the proportion of offenders that reoffended between 12 and 24 months after release are not available.
Juvenile reoffending covers offenders aged 17 and under. A release from custody could be from a secure training centre, a secure children’s home or a young offender institution. Data are not broken down by type of release establishment or by individual release establishment.
Table 1 as follows shows the rate of reoffending for each of the last five years for which data are available for offenders in the specified age groups. Those aged 12 through to 15 have been banded due to the small number of offenders in each of the groups.
Percentage of offenders that committed a reoffence Cohort Age Number of offenders Within 1 month of release Between 1 and 6 months of release Between 6 and 12 months of release Total 2003 12-15 133 9.0 46.6 22.6 78.2 16 235 20.0 44.3 12.3 76.6 17 418 15.3 44.0 11.5 70.8 2004 12-15 209 19.1 42.6 18.7 80.4 16 244 18.0 45.9 13.1 77.0 17 362 16.6 45.0 12.2 73.8 2005 12-15 193 19.7 45.6 15.5 80.8 16 275 19.6 38.2 12.4 70.2 17 374 17.4 39.6 14.7 71.7 2006 12-15 200 19.5 44.5 19.0 83.0 16 262 20.6 43.5 15.3 79.4 17 355 14.6 42.0 15.2 71.8 2007 12-15 171 19.3 43.9 15.8 78.9 16 246 17.5 44.7 15.0 77.2 17 361 17.5 40.7 14.1 72.3
Offenders that are aged 18 and 19 are included in the adult dataset. We do not have the facility to determine which offenders were released from young offender institutions. However, all 18 and 19 year old offenders are held under young offender institution conditions, even if they are held in an adult prison. Table 2 shows the reoffending rates for all offenders aged 18 and 19 who were released from custody for the last five years for which data are available.
Percentage of offenders that committed a reoffence Cohort Age Number of offenders Within 1 month of release Between 1 and 6 months of release Between 6 and 12 months of release Total 2003 Q1 18 572 15.6 33.9 12.9 62.4 19 728 14.3 35.7 12.4 62.4 2004 Q1 18 559 15.4 36.5 11.4 63.3 19 783 15.3 32.1 10.7 58.1 2005 Q1 18 551 16.5 37.7 14.2 68.4 19 689 12.3 32.5 12.2 57.0 2006 Q1 18 477 14.9 31.0 13.0 58.9 19 644 14.3 31.4 11.5 57.1 2007 Q1 18 461 20.0 35.6 13.7 69.2 19 593 13.2 31.5 11.1 55.8
Please note that the definition of a reoffence differs between adults and juveniles. For adults, any offence within a year of release from custody, that is proven by court conviction within 18 months of release, is counted as a reoffence. For juveniles, an offence proven by court conviction or a caution within the same time period is counted as a reoffence. For this reasons the adult and juvenile reoffending rates are not directly comparable.
Further information on adult reoffending is available at:
http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/reoffendingofadults.htm
Further information on juvenile reoffending is available at:
http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/reoffendingjuveniles.htm
Treasury
Banks: Finance
RBS will bear 100 per cent. of the first £60 billion of losses on the £282 billion of assets that it has included in the Asset Protection Scheme (APS). As set out in the details of the Asset Protection Scheme, published on 7 December 2009, this is in line with HM Treasury's current view of the most likely level of losses on the APS assets.
Child Benefit: EU Nationals
The information requested is not available, as HM Revenue and Customs systems do not capture the time taken to obtain confirmation from other EEA member states.
Departmental Conferences
The Treasury does not hold a central record of conferences and the information requested could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Departmental Pay
(2) how much funding his Department has allocated for (a) year-end and (b) in-year bonuses in 2009-10.
The following table sets out the information requested on performance awards paid by HM Treasury in 2008-09. For information on prior years I refer the hon. Members to the answer given by the then Exchequer Secretary, my hon. Friend the Member for Wallasey (Angela Eagle) on 17 November 2008, Official Report, column 164W.
HM Treasury performance awards 2008-09 Expenditure incurred Performance award (£000) 1,177 Special performance award (£000) 208 Number of staff receiving a bonus Performance award 482 Special performance award 1492 Percentage of staff receiving a bonus2 Performance award 39 Special performance award 40 Largest single award (£000) 20 1 In addition, one award was made to a member of staff on secondment to a private sector organisation that subsequently reimbursed the Department. 2 Based on FTE headcount at 31 March 2009.
EU Emission Trading Scheme
The pre-Budget report includes the most recent estimates for EU ETS receipts, based on the likely number of allowances and the secondary market price of carbon, in the ‘other taxes and Royalties’ line in Table 2.9 of the economy and public finances-supplementary material.
The pre-Budget report (p120) also noted that, to date, UK carbon auctions had raised over £350 million and that future revenue was set to rise to around £2 billion in 2013-14.
Fiscal Policy
Treasury officials undertake analysis relative to their respective policy spheres as a matter of course. This includes reviewing available literature and evaluation of previous policy actions where appropriate.
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
British Indian Ocean Territory: Environment Protection
A decision will be taken following the public consultation which is at present under way and which will run until 12 February 2010.
British Overseas Territories
The information is as follows.
Anguilla: The prison service has submitted a bid to the Government of Anguilla for financial support to enable the prison to purchase modular “ready to use” prison cells. In addition, concurrent plans are in hand to assess the feasibility of converting the prison’s administration block into cellular accommodation. It is also expected that the Parole and Probation Bills will be passed in 2010, thereby diverting from prison a number of offenders and reducing overall prisoner numbers.
British Virgin Islands: A feasibility study is underway to assess the practicality of converting an existing prison workshop and storage area into cellular accommodation for lower risk prisoners. In addition, the establishment of the Parole Board in early 2010 will see a number of early releases on parole, thereby reducing prisoner numbers.
Cayman Islands: There is a process of building work within the site of HMP Northward which will add capacity during 2010. In addition, the Cayman Islands Government are assessing the potential of an “early release” scheme for suitable offenders and have set up a working group to look at the feasibility of a National Strategic Rehabilitation Board.
Turks and Caicos Islands: A new wing of the prison is now complete and the necessary security fencing is due to be finished by the end of January 2010. Although this wing is for the few female prisoners, the opening of this wing will free-up capacity elsewhere in the prison. In addition, the imminent completion of a new prison kitchen will enable the existing kitchen area to be converted into accommodation for low risk prisoners early in 2010.
Broadband
Responsibility for telecommunications in the Falkland Islands, St. Helena and Tristan da Cunha rests with the Governments of the Falkland Islands, St. Helena and Tristan da Cunha, who hold the required information.
Cayman Islands
The Royal Cayman Islands Police Service has clarified that, of the 13 officers arrested in the last five years, six were arrested for criminal offences and the others were arrested for non-criminal offences. Of the six arrested for criminal offences, three have been convicted, two await trial and one has been acquitted.
Croatia: EC Enlargement
On 21 December 2009 the EU and Croatia provisionally closed a further two chapters of the accession negotiations, bringing the total provisionally closed to 17 out of 35. A further 11 chapters are open and under negotiation.
The European Commission published its annual report on enlargement on 14 October 2009 which assessed that Croatia’s preparations had advanced substantially across the board in 2009, that technical negotiations are now nearing their final phase, and that if Croatia meets all outstanding benchmarks in time it could be possible to conclude negotiations in 2010. But Croatia has much to do if it is to meet this time scale. Reform efforts need to be stepped up in the areas of judiciary and fundamental rights, in particular as regards the independence and efficiency of the judiciary, the fight against corruption and organised crime, minority rights, including refugee returns, and war crimes trials. Public administration reform also requires particular attention. Croatia also needs to take all necessary steps to settle the issue of access for the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) to important documents.
The General Affairs Council on 7 and 8 December 2009 took stock of progress, commended Croatia for good overall progress, underlined the importance of meeting all benchmarks, called for the completion of a credible investigation into military documents requested by the Prosecutor of ICTY and welcomed the establishment of a working group for drafting an Accession treaty.
Departmental Air Travel
I refer the hon. Member to the reply given by my right hon. Friend the Member for Derby, South (Margaret Beckett), the then Secretary of State, to the hon. Member for Upper Bann (David Simpson) on 17 May 2006, Official Report, column 995W.
Departmental Manpower
Staff of other Government Departments work under the authority of the Head of Post of the Mission in which they serve. They work to the objectives of their own Departments but the Head of Post has the right to issue instructions on any matter affecting the overall work and safety of the Mission and the Government's interest in the country concerned, and to take decisions on issues such as waiver of immunity or removal of a member of staff from post.
Departmental Pay
For the amounts claimed in reimbursable expenses by press officers at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) in London in financial years 2006-07 and 2007-08, I refer the hon. Member to the reply by my hon. Friend the Member for Sheffield, Heeley (Meg Munn) on 15 September 2008, Official Report, column 2179W.
The amount of reimbursable expenses that press officers at the FCO claimed from the press office budget in London in the financial year 2008/09 totalled £2,074.
Departmental Written Questions
In recent months, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office has significantly improved its performance in answering named day PQs on time. The numbers of such PQs received and answered on time from January 2009 to Prorogation in November 2009 were as follows. Reliable statistics are not available for December 2008.
Received Answered January 66 10 February 62 17 March 66 21 April 29 5 May 40 17 June 50 28 July 45 32 September 35 35 October 92 67 November 22 19
Central guidance on answering parliamentary questions is now available in the ‘Guide to Parliamentary Work’, at:
http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/parliamentary-clerk-guide.aspx
In the response to the Procedure Committee Report on written parliamentary questions, the Government accepted the Committee’s recommendation that Departments be required to provide the Procedure Committee with sessional statistics in a standard format on the time taken to respond to written parliamentary questions, accompanied by an explanatory memorandum setting out any factors affecting their performance. This will be taken forward as soon as possible.
Hotels
Booking and paying for hotel accommodation is devolved to individual Departments and posts to allow them to travel as needed to deliver the Foreign and Commonwealth Office's Strategic Objectives. All expenditure is incurred in accordance with the principles of Managing Public Money and the Treasury handbook on Regularity and Propriety. Records for accommodation and travel are grouped together and to provide a breakdown spanning the period from 2007 to present could be done only at disproportionate cost.
International Criminal Law
A Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression concluded its work on 13 February 2009. The report is available at:
http://www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/asp_docs/ICC-ASP-7-20-Add.1-SWGCA%20English.pdf
It includes proposals on the definition of the crime of aggression, with which the UK is generally content, as well as on the conditions for the exercise of jurisdiction over the crime. The proposals on the latter issue include a number of options. The proposals will now be considered at the Review Conference of the International Criminal Court to be held in Kampala in 2010. The Government continue to believe that any proposals must be consistent with the Charter of the UN and in particular with the primary responsibility of the Security Council for the maintenance of international peace and security.
We have no plans at present to make a further statement.
Kenya: Foreign Relations
UK foreign policy aims to encourage and support implementation of the National Accord agreed by the Kenyan Government following the 2007-08 post-election violence, to address issues that threaten the country’s stability and prosperity. These include promoting a better constitution that reduces the “winner takes all” incentives for violence, making electoral cheating harder, and deterring political violence through reducing impunity. We will continue to support Kenyan leadership in tackling the root causes of violence, including economic inequality, tribal tension, lack of security sector reform and accountability. We will also work to combat corruption in Kenya, which is endemic with little political will to change. This is the same culture that embeds impunity, as seen in Kenya’s failure to prosecute those who perpetrated the post-election violence.
The Government work closely with the EU and other partners such as Kofi Annan to co-ordinate support and engagement against these objectives . My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary attended the EU General Affairs Council Meeting in Brussels last July where Council Conclusions on Kenya were agreed. The conclusions highlighted the need for faster implementation of key reforms vital to the interests of the Kenyan people. My noble Friend, Baroness Kinnock, the Minister for Africa, plans to visit Kenya next week, and will reinforce these messages.
National Action Plan
We are examining the use of indicators as part of the revision of the UK National Action Plan, which is now under way. We have started a stakeholder consultation process that includes the issue of how the UK can best measure progress against a revised plan.
Sudan
The Minister of State, Department for International Development, my hon. Friend the Member for Harrow, West (Mr. Thomas) and my noble Friend Baroness Kinnock issued a statement on 15 December 2009 welcoming the progress made towards the forthcoming referendum in South Sudan following the agreement on 13 December 2009 at the level of the Presidency on the draft Bill.
The draft Bill reflected agreement between the parties on the eligibility to register and vote of southerners living in the north of Sudan and northerners living in the south of Sudan. We welcome the news that, despite last minute difficulties, on 29 December 2009 this Bill was agreed by consensus in the National Assembly in Sudan.
We also welcome the news that the legislation regarding the referendum for Abyei and the popular consultations for Southern Kordofan and Blue Nile States was passed by the National Assembly on 30 December 2009.
Sudan: Human Rights
As a result of tribal fighting, more people have died this year in South Sudan than in Darfur. This, and attacks by the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) displaced more than 300,000 people—more than double the number from 2008. The Government of Southern Sudan (GoSS) face several challenges which include the worsening humanitarian situation as well as security issues, corruption and the mismanagement of food stocks.
Our ambassador met with the Southern Sudan Human Rights Commission in June to assess human rights issues, including the death penalty, women's rights, access to justice and the standard of detention facilities. Our ambassador also meets regularly with the GoSS President and Ministers to discuss citizen insecurity and LRA issues. The UK also works with the UN Mission in Sudan (UNMIS) and other international partners to secure peace so that human rights can be protected in Southern Sudan.
My noble Friend Baroness Kinnock will give a further assessment of developments in Sudan during a debate in the Lords today, 7 January 2010.
Sudan: Politics and Government
We are in regular contact with key partners on all of the issues that face Sudan. This includes contact with both the US and Norway, who together with the UK constituted the Troika during the negotiations for the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA). Our ongoing and close contact with the US and Norway forms a part of the UK's continued engagement with key partners on the situation in Sudan.
The parties to the CPA will need to decide between themselves on the initiatives and mechanisms that will support their efforts to arrive at a peaceful conclusion to the Interim Period. International partners should be prepared to play a strongly supportive role.
My noble Friend Baroness Kinnock will give a further assessment of developments in Sudan during a debate in the Lords today, 7 January 2010.
The implementation of the Abyei ruling of the Permanent Court of Arbitration made in July 2009 is a key part of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA). We are concerned that, despite public commitment by both the National Congress Party and the Sudan People's Liberation Movement to implement the ruling, progress remains significantly behind schedule. We understand that only a small number of border markers along the 230 kilometre border have been placed. Continuing uncertainty over the border increases potential tensions and hinders implementation of other CPA milestones.
We continue to press both parties to ensure that border demarcation, as well as other commitments on Abyei, are urgently completed. A representative of our embassy in Khartoum visited Abyei in early December 2009 as part of a joint delegation with the US embassy and the Assessment and Evaluation Commission. The delegation raised our concerns directly with Government and other interlocutors.
The Secretary of State for the Department of International Development (Mr. Thomas) and my noble Friend Baroness Kinnock released a statement on 15 December 2009 welcoming the progress made towards the forthcoming referendum following the agreement on 13 December 2009 at the level of the presidency on the draft Bill.
We welcome the news that, despite last minute difficulties, on 29 December 2009 this Bill was agreed by consensus in the National Assembly in Sudan.
We also welcome the news that the legislation regarding the referendum for Abyei and the popular consultations for Southern Kordofan and Blue Nile States was passed by the National Assembly on 30 December 2009.
We continue to urge the parties to work together at this critical point in the Comprehensive Peace Agreement to make progress on other outstanding areas and to help deliver a peaceful, equitable future for the whole of Sudan.
Tony Blair
There are four members of the Office of the Quartet Representative who are directly linked to the Government.
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) provides the following full time secondees to the Office of the Quartet Representative (OQR): one higher executive officer equivalent (salary range £23,157 to £31, 495); and one senior civil servant (salary range £57,300 to £116,000). Standard FCO procedure was followed for advertising, recruiting and appointing to these posts. Mr. Blair held final interviews.
The Department for International Development (DfID) also funds a secondee to provide expert governance analysis (Grade 6 equivalent, salary range £55,814 to £66,873).
A locally engaged secondee to the OQR in Jerusalem was also funded through the Conflict Prevention Pool from October 2007 to August 2008 at a cost of £30,874. After that, this position has been funded by the UN Development Programme Trust Fund.
The Department for International Development made a contribution to the Office of the Quartet Representative of £400,000 in financial year 2008-09. This was disbursed between security, accommodation, project management, support staff and general support (IT, office equipment, insurance, etc).
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) provides two secondees to the Office of the Quartet Representative (OQR). Officials from the OQR and FCO meet regularly. The secondees remain subject to the Civil Service Code.
My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary meets with Mr. Blair in his capacity as the Quartet Representative and regularly speaks to him on the telephone. Their last meeting was on 14 October 2009. Other Foreign Office Ministers have not met Mr. Blair recently in his capacity as Middle East peace envoy.
The work of the Office of the Quartet Representative is set within the context of a UN Development Programme (UNDP) programme and is managed by the UNDP office based in Jerusalem according to UN procedures.
This is a matter for the UN Development Programme and the Office of the Quartet Representative to answer.
The Quartet Representative's following aims were set out in a statement from the Quartet:
Mobilise international assistance to the Palestinians, working closely with donors and existing co-ordination bodies;
Help to identify, and secure appropriate international support in addressing, the institutional governance needs of the Palestinian state, focusing as a matter of urgency on the rule of law;
Develop plans to promote Palestinian economic development, including private sector partnerships, building on previously agreed frameworks, especially concerning access and movement; and
Liaise with other countries as appropriate in support of the agreed Quartet objectives.
While the Foreign and Commonwealth Office had no formal role in setting these aims, it has continued to be closely involved in the middle east peace process and supports these aims.
Government funding to the Office of the Quartet Representative is handled by UN Development Programme not by a company.
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office has not authorised the registration of a company in connection with the work of the Quartet Representative, which is a matter for the Office of the Quartet Representative not the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
The UK supports the aims of the Quartet, which are aligned with UK interests. Mr. Blair has made a significant contribution to these aims through his work as Quartet Representative. I refer the hon. Member to my answer to parliamentary question 309256.
We fully support the efforts of the Quartet Representative. He has brought important focus on efforts to create economic development.
We have seen some real progress on the ground. There has been an estimated 5 per cent. real growth in gross domestic product in 2008. This increase is due to a combination of factors especially a strong lead from the Palestinian Authority and strong donor support, but we judge that the Quartet Representative has made a valuable contribution.
The Quartet Representative has also played a strong role on a number of specific projects including the recent launch of Wataniya, the second telephony operator in the Palestinian Territories.
The Office of the Quartet Representative regularly reports to Quartet members and donors. The Quartet Representative is also in regular contact with my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary, as are his officials with our officials at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
Western Sahara: Fisheries
The 2006 EU-Morocco Fisheries Agreement was negotiated by the European Commission as a bilateral agreement with the Kingdom of Morocco—the de facto administering power in Western Sahara—and there was, therefore, no requirement to consult the Polisario Front.
Business, Innovation and Skills
Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement
The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement is a draft multilateral agreement which aims to provide a high-level international framework that strengthens global enforcement of intellectual property rights (IPRs). To combat the counterfeiting and piracy that threatens IPR owners, lawful businesses and the development of the world economy, ACTA concentrates on three areas; (i) better co-ordinated international co-operation, (ii) establishing best practice in enforcement methods and (iii) providing a more coherent legal framework.
The UK's policy on the negotiation of ACTA is to create an international standard to fight the growing problem of large-scale counterfeiting and piracy more efficiently, without introducing new UK intellectual property legislation.
I have regularly met officials of the Intellectual Property Office to keep abreast of the progress of the ACTA negotiations and to ensure that the UK position remains within the scope of existing UK legislation. I have also instructed officials to press for greater transparency in the ACTA negotiations.
Core Storage
An independent valuation was carried out for the Department by the Valuation Office Agency in March 2009.
These are issues for the Natural Environment Research Council. The cores will be located in an extension to the existing National Geological Data Centre in Nottinghamshire. I am advised that construction of the extension and relocation of the samples will be more than offset by the capital gain on the Gilmerton store, and that operating costs will be reduced by about £200,000 year.
Departmental Conferences
This Department does not hold this information centrally and this could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
I have approached the chief executives of the Insolvency Service, Companies House, the National Measurement Office and the Intellectual Property Office and they will respond directly to you.
Letter from Stephen Speed, dated 6 January 2010:
The Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has asked me to reply to your question how much was spent by his Department and its agencies on conferences they organised which were subsequently cancelled in each of the last three years; and what the title was of each such conference.
In the last three years, The Insolvency Service has organised one conference which it subsequently had to cancel. The conference which was entitled ‘Encouraging Company Rescue’ was due to be held in September 2009, and the costs incurred by cancelling this event were approximately £200.
Letter from Gareth Jones, dated 6 January 2010:
I am replying on behalf of Companies House to your Parliamentary Question tabled 15 December 2009, UIN 308819, to the Minister of State for Business, Innovation and Skills.
Companies House has not spent any money in the last three years on conferences which were subsequently cancelled.
Letter from Peter Mason, dated 5 January 2010:
I am responding in respect of the National Measurement Office to your Parliamentary Question tabled 15 December 2009, to the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
The National Measurement Office has not spent anything on conferences they organized which were subsequently cancelled in the last three years.
Letter from Sean Dennehey, dated 22 December 2009:
I am responding in respect of the Intellectual Property Office to your Parliamentary Question tabled 15 December 2009, to the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
There is a Nil Response from The Intellectual Property Office.
Departmental Procurement
The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills is unable to provide nugatory costs relating to cancelled tenders because such costs are not recorded centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
I have approached the chief executives of the Insolvency Service, Companies House, the National Measurement Office and the Intellectual Property Office and they will respond to hon. Member directly.
Letter from Stephen Speed:
The Minister of State, for the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) has asked me to reply to you directly on behalf of the Insolvency Service in respect of your question (2009/289) whether there has been any nugatory cost to (a) his Department and its predecessors and (b) its agencies arising from tendered procurement in circumstances where the tender process has been cancelled prior to the award of the contract in the last five years.
The Insolvency Service has not cancelled any tenders prior to award of contract in the last five years.
Letter from Peter Mason, dated 3 December 2009:
I am responding in respect of the National Measurement Office to your Parliamentary Question tabled on 30 November 2009, to the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
There have been no nugatory costs to the Agency in the last five years relating to tendered procurement where the tender process has been cancelled prior to the award of the contract.
Letter from Sean Dennehey, dated 4 December 2009:
I am responding in respect of the Intellectual Property Office to your Parliamentary Question tabled 30 November 2009, to the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
There has been no nugatory direct cost to the Intellectual Property Office arising from procurement where the tender process has been cancelled prior to the award of the contract in the last five years. However, there was in 2006/07 and 2007/08 nugatory staff effort estimated at approximately £100 each year.
Letter from Gareth Jones:
I am replying on behalf of Companies House to your Parliamentary Question tabled 30 November 2009, UIN 303711, to the Minister of State for Business, Innovation and Skills.
In the last five years Companies House has cancelled one procurement tender exercise prior to award of contract. There were no costs paid to the invited bidders as a result of the cancellation. Internal staff costs would have been incurred in the preparation of the tender process, but it is not possible to quantify them as they were not part of a formal project and therefore not recorded. However, we would not term these particular costs as being nugatory as a lot of the output generated has had continued value as reference material for future procurements.
Departmental Publicity
It is not possible to provide comprehensive figures for spend on ministerial photoshoots and video productions without incurring disproportionate cost. Many videos are produced using internal resources, for use on the Department’s digital channels, such as YouTube. Others are commissioned externally as part of marketing campaigns and often not costed separately. Internal resources are also used for taking photographs at internal events.
Expenditure in the last three financial years using external photographers or video production companies which can readily be identified as ministerial photoshoots or videos including Ministers is as follows for the former Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) and the former Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (DIUS).
£ 2008/09 BERR Photography for ministerial Who’s Who board and events 1,032 Secretary of State event for all staff at BERR, October 2008 8,693.75 DIUS Photography of Ministers 496 Filming of Ministers 8,518.25 2007/08 BERR Photography of Ministers 450 Videos: none identified — DIUS Photography of Ministers: none identified — Filming of Ministers 1,735 2006/07 BERR Photography of Ministers 195.76 Filming of Ministers 7,843
Economic Situation
The BIS policies that were designed specifically to respond to the economic downturn are those launched as “Real Help” schemes by the predecessor Departments (BERR and DIUS), as well as targeted support for graduates and key industrial sectors. The information you have requested is summarised in the following table.
Scheme Date agreed Timetable for implementation and key milestones BIS funding Enterprise Finance Guarantee Announced in November 2008. 12-month continuation announced in December 2009. 14 January: Scheme launched to enable up to £1.3 billion of additional bank lending to SMEs by 31 March 2010. Up to £500 million of additional lending to be enabled between 1 April 2010 and 31 March 2011. Scheme is subject to a 13 per cent. cap on net defaults—Government liability limited to £125 million for initial lending and £50 million for additional lending. Capital for Enterprise Fund Announced in January 2009. January 2009: Scheme announced. Fund registered interest while fund managers were being appointed. April 2009: fund managers appointed. End of March 2010: Fund will be closed to new investments. Fund is on course to invest its allocation in this period. Fund is £75 million, comprising £50 million of Government funds and £25 million committed from banks. £55 million is committed to be invested in period up to the end of March 2010, with £20 million reserved for follow on funding. Working Capital Scheme Announced in January 2009. January 2009: Scheme launched. March 2009: EU State Aids approval received. April 2009: First tranche of guarantees agreed with RBS and Lloyds Banking Group. July 2009: Second tranche signed with Lloyds Banking Group. Short-term existing bank lending is guaranteed up to the end of March 2011. The scheme is designed to be cost neutral. An appropriate provision has been made to cover the possibility of unexpected losses. Trade Credit Insurance Top-up Scheme Announced in April 2009. May 2009: Scheme launched to cover reductions in trade credit insurance cover from 1 October 2008. Two changes made to the scheme: (1) June 2009: Eligibility for the scheme was backdated from 1 April 2009 to 1 October 2008. (2) August 2009: The price was reduced and cover limits were increased. 31 December 2009: Scheme closed to new applicants and all policies will expire by 30 June 2010 at the latest. Demand-led scheme designed to be cost neutral. Contingent liabilities under the scheme capped at a maximum of £5 billion. Prompt Payment Ongoing interest. However, in response to evidence of extending payment times in autumn 2008, BERR announced a range of enhanced measures focused on Government-to-business and business-to-business payment. October 2008: commitment for all central Departments to pay invoices within 10 days—19 out of every 20 invoices are now paid in 10 days. November 2008: BERR (with leading UK business organisations) launches a series of managing cash flow guides. December 2008: BERR supports launch of a new Prompt Payment Code by the Institute of Credit Management. There are now 740 signatories. Development of 10 managing cash flow guides—total cost in the region of £30,000. Automotive Assistance Programme The Automotive Assistance Programme (AAP) received European Commission State Aids approval on 27 February 2009 and was launched in March 2009. AAP operates under the European Commission Temporary Framework for State Aids, which ends on 31 December 2010. The final maturity dates of loan guarantees and loans can extend beyond 2010. Will support investment in automotive sector of up to £2.3 billion through loan guarantees and, exceptionally, loans. Vehicle Scrappage Scheme Announced in April 2009. May 2009: Scheme launched. September 2010: Additional funding to the scheme announced. Up to £400 million. Response to Redundancy Announced in November 2008. April 2009 to December 2010. £100 million. Six month offer Announced in January 2009. April 2009 to March 2011 £83 million. Young Person's Guarantee (Routes into work and work- focused training strands) Announced in April 2009. November 2009 to March 2011. £122.4 million Train to Gain SME flexibilities Announced in October 2008. On offer from January 2009. Flexibilities for funding for repeats ongoing; funding for short units due to end July 2010. From Train to Gain budget, up to £350 million of growth over two years. Professional and Career Development Loans (PCDLs) Announced in the New Opportunities White Paper in January 2009. 1 July 2009: An enhanced version of the Career Development Loans programme went live. We remain committed to delivering 45,000 loans per year as soon as the capacity exists within banks to meet that target. £12 million additional money allocated for 2009-10, with £24 million for 2010-11. This is on top of the recurrent baselines in place (to support existing Career Development Loans) of £25 million per year. Apprenticeships (England). 35,000 additional places in 2009-10 Announced January 2009. 2009-10 financial year: 35,000 additional Apprenticeship starts in England funded by DCSF and BIS. £140 million (BIS and DCSF). Support for Graduates Office for Graduate Opportunities (OGO) established in April 2009 in response to downturn. OGO responsible for several initiatives, as summarised in next column. Internships: initial target of 5,000 internships now increased to 20,000. To be delivered by March 2010. Graduate Talent Pool website: went live in July 2009. Post-graduate study: ongoing policy to increase places—around 24,000 additional places expected—and support through PCDLs (see separate entry in table). Volunteering: 4,000 full-time and over 50,000 part-time or short-term. Help with business start-up or entrepreneurship training: including via HEFCE's Economic Challenges Investment Fund (ECIF) and Flying Start. Ongoing policy. Extra Mini-Knowledge Transfer Partnerships: 10-40 week placements in SMEs for graduates/postgraduates to work on specific projects vital to the business. Teach First: places for 2009/10 and 2010/11. BIS funds the Graduate Talent Pool website and provided funding of £1.184 million in 2009-10 to cover infrastructure and publicity costs. In addition, BIS is working with DWP and HEFCE to deliver 10,000 subsidised internships, at a cost of around £16 million.
Employment: Bullying
Existing legislation protects workers from the most serious kinds of bullying, for instance in cases of discrimination or harassment. The Government publish information and guidance on how this legislation can be used, and ACAS provides a nationwide telephone advice line offering assistance to employers and employees on bullying and other employment issues. These measures support the Government's policy aim that workers should be able to work without fear of being bullied or harassed by employers, fellow employees or anyone else.
Approximately £1 million was committed through DTIs Partnership at Work Fund to support a project on Dignity at Work/Bullying. The project, which completed in May 2008, was led by the Amicus section of Unite and included BAE Systems, Legal and General and British Airways as partners. The project promoted best practice and workplace initiatives to tackle bullying.
In November BIS was pleased to support the launch of new Guidance on Preventing Harassment and Violence in the Workplace prepared jointly by the CBI, (Confederation of British Industry), the PPE (Partnership of Public Employers) and TUC (Trades Union Congress in association with HSE (Health and Safety Executive), and ACAS (Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service).
The joint guidance, issued following a Europe-wide agreement between employers' organisations and unions, aims to give practical help and support to firms and their employees.
This is available at:
http://www.workplaceharassment.org.uk/
European Investments Bank's 2020 Fund
I have been asked to reply.
The 2020 European Fund for Energy, Climate Change and Infrastructure will be advised by an independent advisory team. The advisory team will be responsible for appraising potential investments. The Fund will focus on greenfield investments within target sectors. Investments by the Fund will be equity participations in companies which directly or indirectly own or operate infrastructure in the following target sectors:
1. Transport—TEN-T (trans-European transport networks as defined in Decision No. 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament).
2. Energy—TEN-T (trans-European energy networks as defined in Decision No. 1364/2006/EC of the European Parliament) including electricity and gas, transportation, interconnection, storage, infrastructure (including oil and gas storage, regas terminals, pipelines and related facilities and high voltage transmission) and electricity/gas distribution, electricity/gas/oil production, oil storage, as well as carbon capture and storage.
3. Mature renewables energies—including sustainable energy production, clean transport infrastructure, energy distribution and systems for hybrid transport (e.g. wind, solar, geothermal, biomass, biogas, hydro, waste to energy projects.
The advisory team will commence in the first quarter of 2010. The investment period is expected to be a four- year period from 4 March 2010.
Gilmerton Core Store
[holding answer 6 January 2010]: My noble Friend the Secretary of State has written to my hon. Friend and my noble Friend the Minister of State for Science and Innovation will do so shortly in response to the letter from Redrock Associates International Ltd.
[holding answer 6 January 2010]: The Department has discussed the issues with the Natural Environment Research Council and the British Geological Survey. But this is a management matter for the Natural Environment Research Council.
[holding answer 6 January 2010]: No specific risk assessment was considered necessary as the British Geological Survey (BGS) currently moves core from the oil and gas suppliers to Gilmerton and Keyworth and between its sites, and already understands and manages this risk. It also moves core as part of the International Ocean Drilling Programme across the globe. However, the British Geological Survey will undertake a combined risk assessment and methods statement nearer the time of moving. A working group of the Collections Advisory Group, including co-opted members of the Geological Society of London Petroleum Group, will consider and advise on the detail.
[holding answer 6 January 2010]: The Department has received one letter from Redrock Associates International Ltd. and other stakeholders about the consultation process to relocate core store facilities at Gilmerton and Loanhead.
[holding answer 6 January 2010]: I have had no discussions with stakeholders. These are matters for the Natural Environment Research Council.
Higher Education: Student Numbers
The latest available information from the Higher Education Statistics Agency is provided in the table.
Figures are provided for UK-domiciled full-time first degree enrolments by year of course.
Year of course First degree enrolments First year 343,805 Second year 278,880 Third year 273,165 Fourth year or over 78,875 Total 974,720 Notes: 1. Figures are based on a HESA Standard Registration Population. 2. Figures in the answer have been rounded to the nearest five and may not sum to total. Source: Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA).
The information requested is not available centrally.
Information on applicants and accepted applicants to full-time undergraduate courses in UK institutions is collected by the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS). Accepted applicants who begin courses in January 2010 are included in the 2009/10 entry figures published by UCAS. UCAS can identify which students start courses in January, though they do not regularly publish information on the start date of courses. End of year data for the 2009/10 academic year will not be available until January 2010.
Information on deferrals is provided to BIS from UCAS, but is not broken down by local authority area.
Middlesex University: Research
(2) what his Department’s latest assessment of the quality of research undertaken at Middlesex university is; and if he will make a statement.
Middlesex university has received the following quality-related funding for research allocated by the Higher Education Funding Council for England:
Middlesex university (£ million) 1997-98 1.93 1998-99 2.16 1999-2000 2.29 2000-01 2.31 2001-02 2.35 2002-03 1.76 2003-04 1.66 2004-05 1.63 2005-06 1.92 2006-07 1.86 2007-08 1.96 2008-09 1.95 2009-10 3.4
Higher Education Statistics Agency data show that Middlesex university received the following income from research councils (2008-09 data are not yet available):
Research council grants (£000) 1997-98 512 1998-99 417 1999-2000 557 2000-01 581 2001-02 335 2002-03 17 2003-04 98 2004-05 263 2005-06 339 2006-07 614 2007-08 1,247
Middlesex university achieved the following results in the Research Assessment Exercise 2008, conducted by the Higher Education Funding Council for England, which was published on 18 December 2008. The Department itself does not directly assess the quality of research undertaken at universities.
Unit of assessment FTE category A staff submitted 4* 3* 2* 1* Unclassified 11 Nursing and Midwifery 7.90 5 30 40 20 5 12 Allied Health Professions and Studies 10.10 5 25 35 30 5 23 Computer Science and Informatics 22.30 10 25 45 20 0 32 Geography and Environmental Studies 12.15 5 35 40 20 0 36 Business and Management Studies 38.79 5 25 50 20 0 38 Law 7.30 0 15 35 50 0 40 Social Work and Social Policy and Administration 15.20 5 45 40 10 0 44 Psychology 14.50 0 10 30 60 0 57 English Language and Literature 8.50 5 30 50 15 0 60 Philosophy 7.00 20 45 30 5 0 63 Art and Design 19.00 5 20 55 15 5 64 History of Art, Architecture and Design 12.00 15 40 35 10 0 65 Drama, Dance and Performing Arts 12.10 20 35 25 20 0 66 Communication, Cultural and Media Studies 4.00 0 45 25 30 0
Scale Definition 4* Quality that is world-leading in terms of originality, significance and rigour. 3* Quality that is internationally excellent in terms of originality, significance and rigour but which nonetheless falls short of the highest standards of excellence. 2* Quality that is recognised internationally in terms of originality, significance and rigour. 1* Quality that is recognised nationally in terms of originality, significance and rigour. Unclassified Quality that falls below the standard of nationally recognised work, or work which does not meet the published definition of research for the purposes of this assessment.
Minimum Wage: Nottingham
Data for earnings are not available at the constituency level because of small sample sizes at constituency level in the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (ASHE).
At the Government Office Region level, the lowest available, DTI previously estimated that the number of jobs that stood to benefit from the April 1999 introduction of the national minimum wage (NMW) in the east midlands region was 130,000. In 2009 the BIS estimate for the number of jobs affected by the uprating of the NMW in the east midlands region was 83,000.
Postal Services: Castle Point
I have asked Alan Cook, Managing Director of Post Office Ltd, to respond directly to the hon. Member and a copy of his reply will be placed in the Libraries of the House.
Renewable Energy: Government Assistance
The Department of Business, Innovation and Skills has contributed to the development of the Government’s proposed feed-in tariffs scheme as part of the normal policy-making process. Officials of the Department have had bilateral meetings with officials of the Department of Energy and Climate Change, are members the Renewable Financial Incentives Programme Board and have agreed the consultation proposals.
Research: Finance
[holding answer 6 January 2010]: My colleagues, officials and I discuss a range of issues with HEFCE and the Research Councils regularly.
Both HEFCE and the Research Councils recognise the breadth of ways in which impact is delivered and the long time horizons often required. Both understand impact broadly to include, for example, benefits to the economy, society, public policy, and quality of life.
The UK has a world-class research base of which we can be rightly proud: second only to the US across a broad range of disciplines and the most productive research base in the G8. Government funding for the research base has doubled in real terms since 1997 and it is right that we recognise the impact of excellent research and remove barriers to harvesting the benefits it delivers to the nation.
The Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) and the Research Councils undertake complementary work to pursue that objective. HEFCE recently consulted on proposals for the Research Excellence Framework (REF), and Research Councils have recently introduced impact statements to grant application forms.
The REF will recognise and reward university departments with a track record of delivering impacts from excellent research in the past. Research Council impact statements encourage researchers to consider the potential impact of their work when applying for grants.
Greater emphasis on impact poses no threat to fundamental research. The primary criterion of both peer review and retrospective research assessment remains research excellence.
Students
The information requested is in the following tables.
Students Value (£) 2006/07 Tuition Fee Loan 6,950 11,905,000 Maintenance Loan 9,330 35,369,000 Adult Dependant Grant 40 92,000 Childcare 50 105,000 Maintenance and other grants2 12,220 8,360,000 2007/08 Tuition Fee Loan 8,020 17,955,000 Maintenance Loan 9,470 36,662,000 Adult Dependant Grant 50 100,000 Childcare 50 118,000 Maintenance and other grants2 13,190 9,799,000 2008/09 Tuition Fee Loan 8,960 23,958,000 Maintenance Loan 9,780 39,196,000 Adult Dependant Grant 60 134,000 Childcare 70 208,000 Maintenance and other grants 14,500 11,779,000 1 Student numbers rounded to nearest 10, value of support rounded to nearest £1,000. 2 Includes Maintenance Grant, Higher Education Grant, Special Support Grant, Parental Learning Allowance, Travel Grant and Disabled Student Allowance. Source: Student Loans Company
Students (thousand) Value (£ million) 2006/07 Tuition Fee Loan 397.3 807.7 Maintenance Loan 728.1 2,613.4 Adult Dependant Grant 6.4 14.1 Childcare 8.3 27.1 Grants for Maintenance2 320.9 471.2 2007/08 Tuition Fee Loan 553.5 1,388.6 Maintenance Loan 746.2 2,630.7 Adult Dependant Grant 6.9 15.6 Childcare 9.6 31.2 Grants for Maintenance2 395.2 713.2 2008/09 Tuition Fee Loan 696.9 1,981.1 Maintenance Loan 771.5 2,717.0 Adult Dependant Grant 7.8 18.0 Childcare 9.8 36.1 Grants for Maintenance2 495.7 1,025.0 1 Student numbers rounded to nearest 1,000, value of support rounded to nearest £ million. 2 Maintenance Grant and Higher Education Grant. Source: Student Loans Company
The information requested on bursaries and scholarships is not available centrally as they are the responsibility of Higher Education Institutions. Reliable information is not available at constituency level. Complete information for the current academic year 2009/10 is not yet available, and will be available in late 2010 when a Statistical First Release on Student Support will be published on the Student Loans Company website.
Tuition fee loans are not paid before commencement of the course. The information requested on bursaries and scholarships is not available centrally as they are the responsibility of higher education institutions. The other information requested in the answer cannot be produced except at disproportionate cost.
Students: Loans
Reliable information to answer this question is not available at constituency level.
Students: Milton Keynes
The latest available information from the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) on enrolments from Milton Keynes local authority is shown in table 1. Figures for the 2008/09 academic year will be available in January 2010.
Academic year Enrolments 1997/98 3,745 1998/99 3,935 1999/2000 4,005 2000/01 4,020 2001/02 4,250 2002/03 4,400 2003/04 4,650 2004/05 4,880 2005/06 5,055 2006/07 5,185 2007/08 5,250 1 Covers enrolments to both full-time and part-time undergraduate and postgraduate courses. 2 Excludes the Open university due to inconsistencies in its data across the time series. Note: Figures are based on a snapshot count as at 1 December to maintain consistency across the time series and have been rounded to the nearest five. Source: Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA).
Data from the Student Loans Company on the number of student loan borrowers from Milton Keynes are shown in table 2.
Academic year Students receiving loans 2001/02 2,500 2002/03 2,700 2003/04 3,000 2004/05 3,100 2005/06 3,300 2006/07 3,400 2007/08 3,600 2008/09 3,800 1 Consistent data are not available before 2001/02. Figures cover income contingent loans for maintenance and tuition fees. Older mortgage style loans are excluded. Source: Student Loans Company.
Data from the two sources (HESA and SLC) are not directly comparable because certain students and courses (for example postgraduate courses) included in table 1 do not attract student support. Additionally, table 2 provides those who have taken out loans, but does not include those who may have received student support in the form of a grant such as students from lower income families or those who study part-time courses.
UK Resource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology
The UK Resource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology was set up in September 2004 by the Department for Trade and Industry, subsequently the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (DIUS) and now the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS).
Funding has been allocated for each year as follows:
£ million 2004-05 1.39 2005-06 1.74 2006-07 2.296 2007-08 2.055 2008-09 2.522 2009-10 2.427 2010-11 2.453 1 Variously DTI/DFES/DIUS/BIS
Unemployment
I have been asked to reply.
We are determined to ensure that every 16 and 17-year-old who is not in education, employment or training (NEET) is given an opportunity to engage in learning so that they can develop the skills they will need for the upturn. The January Guarantee will ensure that all 16 and 17-year-olds who are NEET in January 2010 have the offer of an entry to employment place.
Information provided by Connexions services shows that there were around 60,000 16 and 17-year-olds NEET in January 2009. Many of these young people will already have a job or a place in learning to start in January, while there are others whose personal circumstances will prevent a return to learning at this time.
Children, Schools and Families
British Educational Communications and Technology Agency: Expenditure
The funding allocation from the Department for Children, Schools and Families to British Educational Communication and Technology Agency (BECTA) for 2007-08 was £38,394,000 and for 2008-09 was £61,550,000.
The funding allocations are from DCSF and other Government grants for expenditure to support the effective use of technology across the education and skills sectors.
BTEC Diplomas
The following tables shows the number of 16-year-olds in (a) Leeds West constituency, (b) West Yorkshire and (c) England who completed a BTEC First Diploma in each subject in each of the last five years for which information is available.
Year in which qualification was achieved Qualification title: Edexcel level 2 BTEC First Diploma: 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 For ICT Practitioners 0 0 0 0 0 For IT Practitioners (General) 0 0 0 0 0 For IT Practitioners (ICT Systems Support) 0 0 0 0 0 For IT Practitioners (Software Development) 0 0 0 0 0 In Agriculture 0 0 0 0 0 In Animal Care 0 0 0 0 0 In Applied Science 0 0 0 0 0 In Art and Design 0 0 0 0 0 In Business 0 0 0 0 0 In Caring 0 0 0 0 0 In Children’s Care, Learning and Development 0 0 0 * * In Construction 0 0 0 0 0 In Countryside and Environment 0 0 0 0 0 In Design 0 0 0 0 0 In Early Years 0 0 * 0 0 In Electronics 0 0 0 0 0 In Engineering 0 0 0 * 5 In Fish Husbandry 0 0 0 0 0 In Floristry 0 0 0 0 0 In Front Line Services 0 0 0 0 0 In Health and Social Care 0 0 0 8 9 In Horse Care 0 0 0 0 0 In Horticulture 0 0 0 0 0 In Hospitality 0 0 0 0 0 In Land-based Technology 0 0 0 0 0 In Logistics 0 0 0 0 0 In Manufacturing Engineering 0 0 * 0 0 In Media 0 0 0 0 0 In Music 0 0 0 0 0 In Operations and Maintenance Engineering 0 0 0 0 0 In Performing Arts 0 0 0 0 0 In Public Services 0 0 0 0 0 In Retail 0 0 0 0 0 In Sport 0 0 0 0 0 In Sport and Exercise Sciences 0 0 0 0 0 In Travel and Tourism 0 0 0 0 * In Vehicle Service and Technology 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 * 14 18
Year in which qualification was achieved Qualification title: Edexcel level 2 BTEC First Diploma: 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 For ICT Practitioners 0 0 0 112 164 For IT Practitioners (General) 7 10 28 0 0 For IT Practitioners (ICT Systems Support) * 7 20 0 0 For IT Practitioners (Software Development) 0 6 6 0 0 In Agriculture 0 0 0 0 0 In Animal Care 49 55 78 58 59 In Applied Science 0 0 0 30 36 In Art and Design 0 23 49 64 89 In Business 10 54 87 127 181 In Caring 27 53 45 0 0 In Children’s Care, Learning and Development 0 0 0 45 57 In Construction 6 9 25 45 52 In Countryside and Environment 0 0 0 0 0 In Design 20 17 7 * 0 In Early Years 32 23 52 0 0 In Electronics 0 0 0 0 0 In Engineering 0 0 0 21 25 In Fish Husbandry 0 0 0 0 0 In Floristry 0 0 0 0 0 In Front Line Services 0 0 0 0 0 In Health and Social Care 0 0 25 191 200 In Horse Care 5 11 * 10 * In Horticulture 0 4 * * 0 In Hospitality 0 0 0 0 * In Land-based Technology 0 0 0 0 0 In Logistics 0 0 0 0 0 In Manufacturing Engineering 19 13 16 0 0 In Media 5 7 10 21 25 In Music 0 0 0 31 48 In Operations and Maintenance Engineering * 0 4 0 0 In Performing Arts 55 81 87 67 67 In Public Services 75 82 106 106 97 In Retail 0 0 0 0 0 In Sport 37 45 47 115 121 In Sport and Exercise Sciences 24 39 29 0 0 In Travel and Tourism 6 55 54 45 50 In Vehicle Service and Technology 4 0 0 0 0 Total 385 594 779 1,091 1,276
Year in which qualification was achieved Qualification title: Edexcel level 2 BTEC First Diploma: 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 For ICT Practitioners 0 0 0 2,847 3,456 For IT Practitioners (General) 598 1,169 1,465 7 0 For IT Practitioners (ICT Systems Support) 107 207 332 0 0 For IT Practitioners (Software Development) 188 224 297 * 0 In Agriculture 75 72 102 98 103 In Animal Care 795 906 951 1,079 1,176 In Applied Science 87 208 346 658 782 In Art and Design 0 521 1,743 2,906 3,274 In Business 307 949 1,992 3,515 4,790 In Caring 561 1,018 385 * 0 In Children’s Care, Learning and Development 0 0 0 803 991 In Construction 50 130 338 523 532 In Countryside and Environment 79 92 152 148 162 In Design 587 790 561 3 0 In Early Years 439 628 936 7 0 In Electronics 130 156 240 0 0 In Engineering 0 0 0 1,020 1,205 In Fish Husbandry 27 47 42 42 50 In Floristry * 8 14 18 23 In Front Line Services 0 0 0 0 0 In Health and Social Care 0 0 1,524 3296 4,058 In Horse Care 245 284 258 279 289 In Horticulture 138 108 156 172 182 In Hospitality 0 16 88 143 169 In Land-based Technology 0 0 0 33 34 In Logistics 0 0 4 0 20 In Manufacturing Engineering 479 556 690 7 11 In Media 232 868 1,182 1,501 1,718 In Music 0 0 0 822 1,001 In Operations and Maintenance Engineering 71 89 113 0 * In Performing Arts 1,644 2,048 2,425 1,735 1,737 In Public Services 1,674 2,176 2,563 2,892 3,310 In Retail * 27 111 139 241 In Sport 1,489 2,248 2,827 4,147 4,246 In Sport and Exercise Sciences 630 604 601 7 * In Travel and Tourism 231 933 1361 1,595 1,981 In Vehicle Service and Technology 216 196 205 245 290 Total 11,086 17,278 24,004 30,689 35,843 * = Figures less than 3 have been suppressed. Source: National Information System for Vocational Qualifications.
Children: Social Services
The costs of conducting a serious case review are not held centrally. It is the responsibility of each Local Safeguarding Children Board to undertake a serious case review where appropriate. The costs will vary considerably depending on the complexity of the case and the cost of the independent overview author.
Christmas
The Department for Children, Schools and Families was created on 28 June 2007. Since then four Christmas trees have been purchased from a sustainable source at a total cost of £2,100. This included delivery and installation costs. The supplier has advised that for every tree that is cut down, another is grown. The trees are shredded and recycled.
[holding answer 10 December 2009]: The Department for Children, Schools and Families budgeted £550 for Christmas trees in 2009.
Departmental Buildings
At the present time no smart meters are in use in the Department for Children, Schools Families main building. However, funding has been secured from the Department for Energy and Climate Change for the installation of sub-metering which will enable us to identify where the most electricity is being consumed so that it can be targeted in the future.
Expenditure in respect of works and refurbishments to Ministers' offices in the last year was £19,876.00. This follows the appointment of an additional Minister to the Department in June 2009, which required a new office to be created.
Departmental Conferences
To provide a response would incur disproportionate cost.
Departmental Hotels
The Department for Children, Schools and Families was established in June 2007. Expenditure on hotel accommodation during 2008-09 was £1,510,651.
Departmental Meetings
In its response to a report by the Public Administration Select Committee “Lobbying: Access and influence in Whitehall”, the Government agreed to publish on-line, on a quarterly basis, information about ministerial meetings with outside interest groups. Information for the period 1 October 2009 to 31 December 2009 will be published by Departments as soon as the information is ready.
Departmental Pay
The wages/salary bill for 2006-07 was £132.4 million of which non-consolidated performance payments represented 1.7 per cent. All employees are eligible for non-consolidated performance payments, subject to strict criteria in line with the Government’s policy on public sector pay. Senior civil service non-consolidated payments are determined as part of a central performance management framework managed by the Cabinet Office. Payments for other grades are subject to the pay remit process and reflect previous pay settlements. Non-consolidated performance payments have to be re-earned each year and do not add to future pay bill costs (e.g. pensions) and are an integral element of the reward package for staff.
The information for 2006/07 refers to the former Department for Education and Skills.
Number of non-consolidated payments Expenditure (£ million) 2006-07 1,235 1.9
The wages/salary bill for 2007-08 was £111.9 million of which non-consolidated performance payments represented 1.9 per cent.
Number of non-consolidated payments Expenditure (£ million) 2007-08 1,669 2.1
The wages/salary bill for 2008-09 was £111.8 million of which non-consolidated performance payments represented 1.9 per cent.
Number of non-consolidated payments Expenditure (£ million) 2008-09 1,403 1.9
Departmental Training
We hold records on training provided centrally. In the 12 months to the end of November 2009, one employee attended a training course where an element of it was delivered overseas. This was a leadership development programme at the National School of Government which consisted of six modules of which five were delivered locally in the UK. The total cost was £14,500, with the overseas element of the programme amounting to £4,350.
A number of training courses are agreed locally and a detailed check of those records to see if any involved an element of overseas travel would incur disproportionate cost.
Driving
The Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) has travel policy in place for staff which is accessible via the Department's intranet. This guidance states clear roles and responsibilities for managers and staff. The responses to the questions raised are:
ix(a) Mechanisms are in place to ensure that staff hold valid driving licences for any vehicles the Department is responsible for. (The Department does not own any vehicles.)
(b) Mechanisms are in place to ensure that staff who use their own vehicles for official business must have valid driving licences and insurance. Before using their own vehicles for official travel, staff must complete an application form which, together with copies of their Motor Vehicle Insurance Certificate, MOT certificate (if appropriate) and a business case signed by at least a Deputy Director, is sent to the Professional Services and Commodities Category Unit for approval.
(c) Road safety guidance for staff. The Department has produced a “Safe Driving Policy” booklet (available via the intranet) which provides road safety guidance. It is expected that compliance to the departmental guidelines is observed by staff.
(d) Steps to monitor compliance to the guidance. Staff have the responsibility to ensure compliance with the guidance.
(e) Requirements to report accidents. All accidents associated with hire companies are brought to the attention of the Professional Services and Commodities Category Unit for investigation.
(f) Accident reports are investigated. All notified motor vehicle accidents are thoroughly investigated.
Education Maintenance Allowance
The policy intention of education maintenance allowance is to encourage more young people aged 16 to 19 from low-income families to participate in post-compulsory learning. We do not have plans to extend the eligible age group.
Adult learners (aged 19-plus) can apply for the adult learning grant (ALG). This pays up to £30 per week, during term time, to those on low incomes undertaking full-time learning for their first full level 2 or first full level 3 qualification. Young people in receipt of EMA can move on to ALG when they become 19 where they remain in learning.
Educational Institutions: Vetting
(2) how many representations he has received from language schools on the application of the vetting and barring scheme and Criminal Records Bureau checks for host families for foreign children in the last six months.
There are currently no requirements on language schools to conduct Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) checks on the individuals they engage to host foreign students.
Acting as host parents for a student at a language school is regulated activity under the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006. Engaging in regulated activity will normally require registration with the Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA). However, as announced by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families on 14 December 2009, Official Report, column 50WS, in his response to the Sir Roger Singleton’s report “Drawing the Line” on the vetting and barring scheme, we shall lift the requirement for registration for exchange visits where the student’s parents accept responsibility for the selection of the host family, the host parents are unpaid volunteers, and the visit lasts less than 28 days.
Where these conditions are not met, the requirement for registration of the host parents will remain in place. Where the requirement for registration applies, a language school that uses host parents without checking their ISA registration status would commit an offence under section 11 of the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006. Under section 11(9), the maximum penalty for this offence is a fine of up to level 5 on the standard scale (currently £5,000).
The Department for Children, Schools and Families has not received any representations from language schools on this issue during the last six months.
Engagement Programme Funding
The Key Stage 4 engagement programme is a locally shaped and managed initiative and local authorities have developed a range of models for delivering the programme in their area. DCSF funding for 2009/10 totals £19,334,000 and this is used in different ways by the 142 local authorities involved. Detailed data breaking down how each local authority is deploying this resource are not kept centrally and therefore it is not possible to provide the overview sought by the hon. Member.
GCSE
The information can be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Home Education
The Department collected statistical information relating to safeguarding and educational concerns about home educated children that can be found at
http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/everychildmatters/ete/independentreviewofhomeeducation/irhomeeducation/
Some reports of specific instances of abuse or poor educational practice were made to Graham Badman and DCSF as part of the background evidence collected for the Review of Elective Home Education in England.
Hotels
Expenditure on hotels on behalf on individuals is not held separately. The following table shows the cumulative spend for Ministers, special advisers and civil servants for each of the last five years.
Financial years Hotels (£) 2005 1,161,915 2006 1,039,714 2007 1,006,349 2008 1,191,780 2009 1,510,651
Travel by Ministers, civil servants and special advisers is undertaken in accordance with the ministerial code and the civil service management code respectively.
Independent Safeguarding Authority
The National Safeguarding Delivery Unit (NSDU) does not routinely communicate with the Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA). The ISA has been asked to join the Partnership Network, a broad coalition of partners, including key voluntary sector and professional stakeholders, which has been established to work with the NSDU to pursue specific issues impacting on effective front-line safeguarding practice.
Sir Roger Singleton provides advice and challenge to the NSDU in his independent capacity as chief adviser on the safety of children.
Personal Social and Health Education
Under existing legislation, secondary schools are required by law to provide sex education, but there is no requirement for primary schools to provide sex education. Both primary and secondary schools are also required to deliver the statutory science curriculum, which includes age-appropriate information on human biology. In addition we expect schools to provide a much broader programme of sex and relationships education (SRE) through well planned and non-statutory personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education. As part of this programme schools should teach about all types of relationships that exist within society, including homosexual relationships.
SRE should be taught gradually, so that learning can be built upon year-by-year in a way that is appropriate to the age and maturity of each child. For example, SRE in primary schools will address issues of differences and bullying.
We have announced our intention to legislate to make PSHE education, including SRE, a statutory subject within the national curriculum at key stages 1-4.
Provisions are included within the Children, Schools and Families Bill which will give effect to this change. Further information is available in the written ministerial statement by the Secretary of State on 5 November 2009, Official Report, columns 49-52WS.
Pupils: Epilepsy
(2) what recent discussions he has had with epilepsy representative groups to improve educational outcomes for children with epilepsy.
The Government are committed to closing the gap in educational achievement between children with special educational needs and their peers.
The Department for Children Schools and Families and the Department of Health are currently engaged with key stakeholders, including those from organisations representing epilepsy, in developing revised guidance to schools on how to support children and young people with medical needs. The guidance will support schools to develop policies in relation to managing the health needs of children and young people: this will include advice to teachers and support staff on how to administer medicines. We have a stakeholder meeting scheduled for January at which we will discuss how the organisations representing the conditions can enhance the guidance.
In the Children's Plan progress report, we announced £31 million for the two-year Achievement for All project to improve outcomes for all children and young people with special educational needs and disability which would include children with epilepsy who have additional needs. The project is taking place in around 450 schools across 10 local authorities for two years from September 2009 until September 2011.
Pupils: Religious Freedom
We are currently considering the implications of this ruling but our early conclusions are that we believe that the circumstances in Italy are clearly different from those in England and that such a ruling would have no impact on our schools provision. This is because the concerns of the court in this case, which lead to the breach of human rights conclusion, were around the lack of pluralism in the Italian education system—that there was no choice for non-Christian parents/pupils in Italy since every classroom in every school must be adorned with a crucifix—as set out in a Royal Decree. This is certainly not the case in England where there is no such universal display of religious imagery. Parental choice is a key feature of our education system and the majority of schools are maintained schools of no particular religion but there is also the choice available of faith schools catering for many different faiths.
School Meals
The Department does not collect this information. However, the Fourth Annual Survey of Take-up of School Lunches in England, published in November 2009 by the School Food Trust and the Local Authority Caterers Association, gives average lunch prices in 2008/09 of £1.77 in primary schools, and £1.88 in secondary schools. Information on the average cost of providing a school meal is not collected by the survey.
Schools
The information is provided in the following tables.
Source:
EduBase 2
Middle Deemed Primary Primary Government Office Region 1997 2002 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Grand total East Midlands — — — — — — — 3 2 7 3 26 9 2 10 8 8 11 10 1 100 East of England — — — — — — — 4 6 6 16 13 8 13 11 11 8 24 13 5 138 London — — — 1 1 1 1 11 20 21 16 22 14 16 9 7 7 8 6 4 165 North East — — — — — — — 4 5 3 6 3 10 10 7 6 14 4 5 3 80 North West — — — — — — — 13 11 16 7 17 23 20 15 16 10 16 12 7 183 South East — — — — — — — 11 2 14 12 16 9 12 21 13 13 19 18 4 164 South West 1 1 1 — 1 — 1 4 13 15 15 10 4 9 5 17 18 13 12 12 152 West Midlands — — — — — — — 7 8 13 16 8 8 12 17 17 13 31 4 11 165 Yorkshire and the Humber — — — — — — — 6 3 9 13 8 15 10 11 12 8 15 5 6 121 Grand total 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 63 70 104 104 123 100 104 106 107 99 141 85 53 1,268
MDS Secondary Government Office Region 2001 2004 2006 2008 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Grand total East Midlands — 1 — — — — 1 — 3 1 1 3 — — 1 — — 11 East of England — — — — 1 — 1 1 1 — 1 — 1 3 3 — — 12 London — — — — 2 2 8 3 3 4 1 2 1 1 2 — — 29 North East — — 1 — — — 1 1 2 2 2 1 — — 1 — 1 12 North West — — — — 2 1 1 4 3 2 1 3 3 9 3 1 6 39 South East — — — 1 2 2 3 1 3 2 2 1 2 — — — 1 20 South West — — — — 1 — 2 2 — — 1 1 1 3 2 — — 13 West Midlands 2 — — — 1 1 — — 3 — — — — 1 5 — 1 14 Yorkshire and the Humber — — — — — 1 1 3 3 1 — — — — 2 — 2 13 Grand total 2 1 1 1 9 7 18 15 21 12 9 11 8 17 19 1 11 163 MDS = Middle Deemed Secondary Schools
Middle Deemed Primary Government Office Region 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 East Midlands — — — — — — — — — — — East of England — — — 1 — — — — — 12 3 London — — — — — 3 1 1 1 1 North East — — — — — — — — — — — North West — — — — — — — — — — — South East 2 3 3 3 1 — 8 — — — 5 South West 2 — — 1 — — 1 4 1 — 1 West Midlands — — — 1 1 — — — — — — Yorkshire and the Humber — — — — 2 — — — — — — Grand total 4 3 3 6 4 3 9 5 2 13 10
Government Office Region 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Grand total East Midlands 8 4 7 7 38 16 11 11 28 18 27 30 10 215 East of England 2 16 7 23 29 13 27 20 25 11 35 27 5 256 London 30 38 41 26 37 27 30 23 12 14 19 15 18 337 North East 9 13 7 12 12 22 21 17 14 26 13 20 10 196 North West 53 33 43 21 43 62 42 41 49 41 39 42 20 529 South East 24 7 21 15 28 17 16 28 22 37 33 34 7 314 South West 8 37 19 24 13 14 12 12 32 35 34 24 27 301 West Midlands 20 15 30 31 21 22 25 39 36 36 48 11 24 360 Yorkshire and the Humber 14 8 19 23 23 31 24 26 24 28 32 18 14 286 Grand total 168 171 194 182 244 224 208 217 242 246 280 221 135 2,794
Middle Deemed Secondary Government Office Region 1997 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 East Midlands 2 — 9 — — 15 — — — — — East of England — — 3 — — — — 1 — — — London — — — 2 — — — — — — — North East — 3 2 5 1 2 3 2 — 4 3 North West — — — — — — — — — — — South East — — — — 10 — — — — 5 2 South West — — — — — 3 5 — — — — West Midlands — — 4 — — 1 — — 11 1 — Yorkshire and the Humber 7 57 — — — — — — — 1 — Grand total 9 60 18 7 11 21 8 3 11 11 5
Government Office Region 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Grand total East Midlands 4 1 8 3 6 1 4 6 1 — — 8 10 78 East of England 2 3 2 2 — 1 3 — — 5 9 5 10 46 London — 1 6 — 1 4 3 3 6 7 6 8 7 54 North East — 2 3 2 4 5 5 — — — 4 2 7 59 North West — 2 6 9 7 5 2 4 5 16 8 16 22 102 South East 1 3 4 3 4 3 3 1 2 1 7 8 12 69 South West — — — 4 — 4 1 3 1 1 3 4 5 34 West Midlands — 3 — — 4 3 2 — 1 4 10 7 9 60 Yorkshire and the Humber 1 1 3 4 4 1 — 4 2 6 8 3 14 116 Grand total 8 16 32 27 30 27 23 21 18 40 55 61 96 618
Special Educational Needs
The Department has not made an estimate of the average cost of a statutory assessment of a child’s special educational needs (SEN). However, in 2002 the Audit Commission published a report “Statutory assessment and statements of SEN: in need of review?” which estimated the overall cost of producing an SEN statement, including the assessment, was £2,500.
Teachers: Pay
This information is not available in the format requested because records are incomplete for part-time and unqualified teachers.
All full-time qualified teachers in service in local authority maintained schools earn more than £18,000 per annum. The minimum salary for qualified teachers in England and Wales excluding the London area is £21,102 and for unqualified teachers £15,461.
International Development
Commonwealth: Health Services
The commitments made in Commonwealth Health Compact agreed at the Commonwealth Heads of Governments meeting in Trinidad and Tobago in November 2009 are set out in the paragraph 93 of the official communiqué of the meeting. In the Compact Heads of Government:
Called on donor countries to deliver existing commitments for financing in health and identify ways to increase international resources;
Welcomed the steps taken by low-income countries towards universal access to health services, making them free at the point of use and urged further concerted action;
Support the role of civil society to advocate for, support and contribute to universal coverage of basic health care.
The compact focuses on efforts to support developing countries to meet the domestic health needs of their own populations, particularly by strengthening health systems and removing financial barriers to the poor in accessing to domestic health services. The compact is not relevant to and makes no commitments on the provision of health services by any country to visiting foreign nationals.
Departmental Conferences
The Department for International Development (DFID) cancelled one conference within the last three financial years, 2006-07 to 2008-09. The conference was titled ‘Tackling Overseas Bribery’ and was scheduled to take place from 3-4 September 2008. The cost of cancellation was £7,500.
Departmental Legislation
The Department for International Development (DFID) has sponsored no secondary legislation that has created or abolished a criminal offence since 1 May 2008.
Offenders
The Department for International Development (DFID) holds details of criminal convictions on classified individual personal security files. We do not maintain a central record of the number of staff convicted of criminal offences.
Health
AIDS: North West
There were no reported new HIV diagnoses or first AIDS diagnoses in the local authority area of Chorley between 2004 and 2008.
The information requested relating to Lancashire and the North West is shown in the following table.
Area of diagnosis Report type Sex 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 North West New HIV diagnoses Males 426 460 445 385 407 Females 220 249 194 196 206 First AIDS diagnoses Males 71 68 60 75 49 Females 35 17 23 27 12 Lancashire1 New HIV diagnoses Males 67 83 56 44 56 Females 20 16 10 19 21 First AIDS diagnoses Males 13 9 13 17 14 Females <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 1 Does not include sites situated in either Greater Manchester or Merseyside. Notes: 1. Diagnoses are from reports received to end June 2009. Numbers will rise as further reports are received. 2. Data include individuals who have an existing infection as well as those who have a newly acquired infection and therefore the data do not present incidence of infection. 3. The area in which an individual is diagnosed is not necessarily the area of residence. 4. AIDS diagnoses relate to a person’s first diagnosis of an AIDS defining illness. Subsequent diagnoses are not recorded. Source: Health Protection Agency.
Alcoholism: Health Services
The information is not held centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
Babies: Screening
Registered medical practitioners undertake these examinations. They are most commonly done by general practitioners or paediatricians. They will have had additional training, but no further qualifications are required.
The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence clinical guideline, “Routine postnatal care of women and their babies”, states that within 72 hours of birth and at six to eight weeks the baby’s hips should be checked using the Barlow and Ortolani manoeuvres.
The guideline also advises that all health care professionals who care for mothers and babies should work within the relevant competencies developed by Skills for Health:
www.skillsforhealth.org.uk
Relevant health care professionals should also have demonstrated competency and sufficient ongoing clinical experience in undertaking maternal and newborn physical examinations and recognising abnormalities.
Bowel Cancer: Screening
Primary care trusts (PCTs) are responsible for screening services, including the promotion of the NHS bowel screening programme. We would expect those areas with low bowel screening uptake rates to develop targeted programmes to tackle this locally. NHS London has advised that both Redbridge and Waltham Forest PCTs are working to address the issue of low uptake among their local eligible populations.
As the screening programme was implemented in local areas, NHS cancer screening programmes sent out an information pack to all local general practitioners (GPs). As well as explaining how the programme works, the packs contained promotional information, including posters for GPs to use to promote the programme in their own practices.
The National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative, launched in November 2008, is working with NHS cancer screening programmes on key messages and awareness programmes to improve screening uptake, particularly in deprived groups.
Central Lancashire Primary Care Trust: Nurses
The information is not available in the format requested. The following table shows the numbers of qualified nursing staff for the organisations specified.
2002 2008 Total specified organisations All qualified nursing staff 2,709 3,098 Qualified hospital and community health services (HCHS) nursing staff 2,545 2,945 General practitioner (GP) practice nurses 164 153 of which: Central Lancashire Primary Care Trust (PCT) All qualified nursing staff 794 937 Qualified HCHS nursing staff 630 784 GP practice nurses 164 153 Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust All qualified nursing staff 1,915 2,161 Qualified HCHS nursing staff 1,915 2,161 GP practice nurses n/a n/a n/a = not applicable Notes: 1. Due to organisation changes it is not possible to provide comparable data for the area covered by Central Lancashire PCT with any degree of accuracy prior to 2002. 2. Data Quality: Work force statistics are compiled from data sent by more than 300 national health service trusts and PCTs in England. The NHS Information Centre for health and social care liaises closely with these organisations to encourage submission of complete and valid data and seeks to minimise inaccuracies and the effect of missing and invalid data. Processing methods and procedures are continually being updated to improve data quality. Where this happens any impact on figures already published will be assessed but unless this is significant at national level they will not be changed. Where there is impact only at detailed or local level this will be footnoted in relevant analyses. Source: The Information Centre for health and social care General and Personal Medical Services Statistics The Information Centre for health and social care Non-medical Workforce Census
Central Lancashire Primary Care Trust: Waiting Lists
The information is not available in the format requested. The following table shows the median in-patient waiting time for elective admission patients still waiting in all specialties for the time period 1997-2009 for commissioner organisations in the central Lancashire area.
Organisation Waiting time (weeks) Month ending March 1997 North West Lancashire Health Authority (HA) 11.9 South Lancashire HA 15.4 Month Ending October 2009 Central Lancashire Primary Care Trust (PCT) 2.8 Notes: 1. Figures are shown for organisations that existed at the time 2. In-patient waiting times are measured from decision to admit by the consultant to admission to hospital. 3. The figures show the median waiting times for patients still waiting for admission at the end of the period stated. 4. Median waiting times are calculated from aggregate data, rather than patient level data, and therefore are only estimates of the position on average waits. 5. In particular, specialties with low numbers waiting are prone to fluctuations in the median. This should be taken into account when interpreting the data. Source: Department of Health waiting list collections QF01 and MMRCOM
The following table shows the median out-patient waiting time for a first out-patient appointment for patients seen in the year in all specialties for the time period 1997-2007 for commissioner organisations in the central Lancashire area.
Organisation Waiting time (weeks) Financial year 1997-98 South Lancashire HA 7.5 North West Lancashire HA 6.0 Financial year 2007-08 Central Lancashire PCT 4.5
The following table shows the median out-patient waiting time for a first out-patient appointment for patients still waiting at the period end in all specialties for the time period 2005-09 for commissioner organisations in the central Lancashire area.
Organisation Waiting time (weeks) Month ending March 2005 Chorley and South Ribble PCT 4.7 West Lancashire PCT 5.3 Preston PCT 4.6 Month ending October 2009 Central Lancashire PCT 2.6 Notes: 1. Figures are shown for organisations that existed at the time. 2. Out-patient waiting times are measured from referral by the GP to first out-patient appointment to the consultant. 3. From 1997-98 all time bands for out-patients seen were first collected so only average waiting first out-patient times can be made from this point in time. 4. The out-patient seen figures relate to the average wait for patients seen during the whole of each year except for 2007-08 where figures relate to quarters 1 and 2 combined. 5. The last time these data were collected for each specialty was for period ending September 2007. 6. From 2004-05 all time bands for out-patients not seen were first collected so only average waiting first out-patient times on a waiting basis can be made from this point in time. 7. Median waiting times are calculated from aggregate data, rather than patient level data, and therefore are only estimates of the position on average waits. 8. In particular, specialties with low numbers waiting are prone to fluctuations in the median. This should be taken into account when interpreting the data. 9. Historically, since 1997, we collected out-patient waiting times based on numbers seen during the quarter (the QM08 return). In addition, we collected data on a ‘still waiting’ basis in our monthly return alongside our in-patient waiting times figures. However, unlike the in-patient figures, we did not collect the full waiting list on out-patients, just the long waiters. Therefore, it was not possible to calculate the average wait on this basis. 10. Since 2004-05, we collected the full out-patient waiting list, hence we could start calculating average waits on the same basis as in-patients from this date. We have since phased out the out-patient ‘seen’ collection, so we now can only use the ‘still waiting’ or ‘not seen’ figures. 11. The result of this is that average waits appear lower on the ‘still waiting’ basis simply because this is collected as a snapshot of patients waiting time at the end of the month before they have been seen. Therefore, the averages appear lower, but we have provided both sets so that users can see the effect and trend. Source: Department of Health waiting list collections QM08R and MMRCOM
Community Health Services: Medical Equipment
(2) how many retailers have registered with the Community Equipment Dispensing Accreditation Board;
(3) how many organisations are using prescriptions for wheelchairs under the Transforming Community Equipment and Wheelchairs Services retail model.
The Department has carried out a review of the developing retail marketplace and obtained feedback from the five local authorities and health partners who implemented a retail model by April 2009. Results show that most authorities prefer to undertake accreditation and monitoring of retailers within their localities using existing supplier vetting procedures. The Department does not collect information on how many retailers have registered with local authorities for the purpose of providing equipment.
The Department has not collected information on the number of retailers who may have received accreditation through the Community Equipment Dispensing Accreditation Board, and the Department did not renew its endorsement of national accreditation after 30 September 2009.
The prescription within the retail model has been designed for simple community equipment aids to daily living and does not include a delivery model for wheelchair services.
(2) how many organisations have been using the retail model since his Department's (a) stakeholder events and (b) endorsement of the Transforming Community Equipment and Wheelchairs Services retail model; whether those organisations are using that model for simple aids to daily living alone; and how much has been paid to management consultants for work for those organisations.
The Department does not collect information on the decommissioning of local equipment stores. Decommissioning equipment stores is a decision for local authorities and their health partners to take based on their individual business cases.
For the provision of complex aids, the Department has developed a methodology, tools and materials to assist and support local authorities and their health partners.
Since ministerial endorsement of the wider implementation of the retail model in June 2008, the model is live in seven local authority and health partnerships where prescriptions are being issued for simple equipment. There are also nine local authority and health partners on track to start issuing prescriptions by the end of March 2010 and a further 14 who have contacted the national programme for support to implement the retail model.
The Care Services Efficiency Delivery, on behalf of the London Joint Improvement Partnership, successfully bid to Capital Ambition, the London Regional Improvement and Efficiency Programme, for £1.93 million to accelerate the implementation of the retail model for simple aids across London within two years. The first wave of five sites have started their projects and it takes each locality between nine and 12 months from taking the decision to completing the implementation of the new model for simple aids to daily living. Sites will start to consider their complex equipment solution during months three to nine of their simple aids to daily living project. Currently there are three “clusters” of organisations developing in London, the North West and South West, who wish to work together to design more efficient complex equipment solutions.
The Department does not collect information on how much has been paid to management consultants for work for those organisations.
Continuing Care: Expenditure
Information on the cost of providing NHS-funded continuing healthcare in each primary care trust is not collected centrally.
Dental Services: Aluminium
(2) how many patients are estimated to have had yellow-coloured copper aluminium alloy fitted instead of dental gold in dental treatment without being informed of the material being used; and if he will make a statement.
Information is not held centrally on which we could base these assessments. The use of this alloy is not permitted in the manufacture of dental appliances prescribed for national health service patients under schedule 3 (a) of the NHS (Dental Charges) Regulations 2005. From April 2008 dentists have been required to provide information on the range of dental appliances they prescribe for NHS patients. If this suggests that there are abuses of the regulations, we will consult the NHS Counter Fraud Service on how to improve compliance.
Departmental Legislation
The criminal offences created by secondary legislation (a total of four statutory instruments) since 1 May 2008 are as follows:
Regulation 6 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Registration of Regulated Activities) Regulations 2009 (S.I. 2009/660) made it a criminal offence for a person registered as a service provider to contravene or fail to comply with the provisions of regulation 5 of those regulations which set out requirements which a service provider has to meet in relation to the prevention and control of health care associated infections. This came into force on 1 April 2009.
Regulation 25 of the Care Quality Commission (Registration) Regulations 2009 (S.I. 2009/3112) makes it a criminal offence for a person to contravene or fail to comply with the provisions of these regulations which set out requirements which registered persons are required to meet in carrying out regulated activities. This will come into force on 1 April 2010.
The Medical Devices (Amendment) Regulations 2008 (S.I. 2008/2936) implement directive 2007/47/EC on general medical devices and directive 90/385/EEC on active implantable devices. These will come into force on 21 March 2010. They amend the Medical Devices Regulations 2002 (SI 2002/618) by adding additional requirements, each of which is punishable as a criminal offence, if not complied with. For general medical devices:
A new regulation 8(3) of the Active Implantable Medical Devices Regulations 1992 is created, under which where a hazard exists, devices which are also machinery must also meet the essential health and safety requirements set out in annex I to directive 2006/42 to the extent to which those essential health and safety requirements are more specific than the essential requirements to directive 93/42;
Regulation 9 is amended, so that when a custom-made device is supplied to a patient, the health care professional who writes the prescription for the custom-made device must, in relation to each patient that they supply with such a device, (a) ensure that the patient is aware that they may request the statement containing the information required by sections 1 and 2 of annex VIII; and (b) ensure that the statement containing the information required by sections 1 and 2 of annex VIII is made available to the patient on request;
Regulation 14 is amended so that where a device is intended by the manufacturer to be used in conjunction with both the provisions in council directive 89/686/EEC on the approximation or the laws of the member states relating to personal protective equipment and directive 93/42, the relevant basic health and safety requirements of that directive must also be fulfilled;
Regulation 16 is amended, requiring the manufacturer, or their single authorised representative, to (a) notify the Secretary of State of the end of the clinical investigation; and (b) provide justification where premature termination has resulted.
Similar amendments are made to the provisions of the Active Implantable Medical Devices Regulations 1992 which deal with active implantable devices:
Regulation 30 is amended so that the manufacturer of an active implantable device, who under their own name places devices on the market, must provide the Secretary of State with (a) the address of their registered place of business; (b) a description of the devices concerned; and (c) details of the label and instructions for use that accompany each device. Where they do not have a registered place of business in a member state, the manufacturer must (a) designate a single authorised representative; and (b) ensure that the authorised representative has a registered place of business in a member state.
The Medicines for Human Use (Marketing Authorisations Etc.) Amendment Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/3097) amend the Medicines for Human Use (Marketing Authorisation Etc.) Regulations (SI 1994/3144) so as to give effect to Regulation (EC) No. 1901/2006 on medicinal products for paediatric use, which establishes a scheme of obligations and incentives to encourage the development of, and improve access to, medicines for children. These came into force on 29 December 2008. They amend the 1994 regulations by imposing several additional requirements, each of which is punishable as a criminal offence:
An authorisation holder must submit an annual report to the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) as required by article 34(4) of the paediatric regulation;
A new paragraph 6BA is added, so that where the holder of a United Kingdom marketing authorisation has benefited from rewards or incentives under articles 36, 37 or 38 of the paediatric regulation in relation to the product to which the authorisation relates and the periods of protection provided pursuant to those articles have expired, he shall be guilty of an offence if he discontinues the placing of that product on the market without previously, in compliance with article 35 of the paediatric regulation (a) transferring the marketing authorisation of that product to another person who has declared his intention to continue to place that product on the market, or (b) allowing use by such a person of the pharmaceutical, pre-clinical and clinical documentation contained in the file on that product on the basis of article 10c of the directive 2001/83/EC;
A new paragraph 6BB is added, so that where the holder of a United Kingdom marketing authorisation has benefited from rewards or incentives under articles 36, 37 or 38 of the paediatric regulation in relation to the product to which the authorisation relates, and the periods of protection provided pursuant to those articles have expired, he shall be guilty of an offence if he discontinues the placing of that product on the market without informing the EMEA in compliance with article 35 of the paediatric regulation, at least six months before the discontinuation of his intention to discontinue the placing of the product on the market;
A new paragraph 6G is added, so that where any person who (a) is the holder of a United Kingdom marketing authorisation (b) obtains a paediatric indication in respect of the product to which the marketing authorisation relates following completion of an agreed paediatric investigation plan, (c) has marketed that product for other indications prior to obtaining that paediatric indication and (d) fails to place the product on the market taking account of the paediatric indication within two years of the date on which the paediatric indication is authorised as required by article 33 of the paediatric regulation, he shall be guilty of an offence;
A new paragraph 13B(1) is added, so that any person established in the United Kingdom to whom a decision by the EMEA in respect of a paediatric investigation plan is addressed shall be guilty of an offence if the plan relates to a product which does not have a Community marketing authorisation and the person fails to (a) enter into the database referred to in article 11 of the clinical trials directive within a period of six months beginning with the date that the decision was received, the details set out in that article in relation to clinical trials referred to in the paediatric investigation plan and carried out in third countries as required by article 41(1) of the paediatric regulation; or (b) submit the results of those clinical trials to the EMEA within a period of six months beginning with the date that the trial ended as required by article 41(2) of the paediatric regulation;
A new paragraph 13B(2) is added, so that where the holder of a United Kingdom marketing authorisation instigates or conducts a paediatric clinical trial in the United Kingdom in respect of the product to which the authorisation relates and the trial is not included in a paediatric investigation plan, he shall be guilty of an offence if he fails to submit the results of that trial to the EMEA within a period of six months beginning with the date that the trial ended, as required by article 41(2) of the paediatric regulation;
A new paragraph 13B(3) is added, so that where the holder of a United Kingdom marketing authorisation has instigated or conducted a paediatric clinical trial in the United Kingdom which ended on or after 26 January 2007 but before 29 December 2008 in respect of the product to which the authorisation relates and the trial is not included in a paediatric investigation plan, he shall be guilty of an offence if he fails to submit the results of that trial to the EMEA on or before 29 June 2009, as required by article 41(2) of the paediatric regulation;
A new paragraph 13B(4) is added, so that where any person who (a) is the sponsor of a paediatric clinical trial in the United Kingdom in respect of a medicinal product (i) with a United Kingdom marketing authorisation, but where the trial is not instigated by the marketing authorisation holder; or (ii) without a United Kingdom or Community marketing authorisation, where the trial is not included in a paediatric investigation plan; and (b) fails to submit the results of that trial to the EMEA within the period of six months beginning on the date that the trial ended as required by article 41(2) of the paediatric regulation, he shall be guilty of an offence;
A new paragraph 13B(5) is added, so that where any person who (a) has sponsored a paediatric clinical trial in the United Kingdom in respect of a medicinal product (i) with a United Kingdom marketing authorisation, but who is not the marketing authorisation holder; or (ii) without a United Kingdom or Community marketing authorisation, where the trial is not included in a paediatric investigation plan and ended on or after 26 January 2007 but before 29 December 2008; and (b) fails to submit the results of that trial to the EMEA on or before 29 June 2009 as required by article 41(2) of the paediatric regulation, he shall be guilty of an offence;
A new paragraph 13B(6) is added, so that any holder of a United Kingdom marketing authorisation who (a) has knowledge of a paediatric study in respect of the product to which the authorisation relates that ended on or before 25 January 2007; and (b) fails to submit that paediatric study to the licensing authority on or before 29 June 2009 as required by article 45(1) of the paediatric regulation, shall be guilty of an offence;
A new paragraph 13B(7) is added, so that any holder of a United Kingdom marketing authorisation who (a) sponsors a paediatric study in respect of the product to which the authorisation relates; and (b) fails to submit the results to the licensing authority within a period of six months beginning with the date that the trial ended as required by article 46(1) of the paediatric regulation, shall be guilty of an offence;
A new paragraph 13B(8) is added, so that any holder of a United Kingdom marketing authorisation who (a) has sponsored a paediatric study in respect of the product to which the authorisation relates which ended on or after 26 January 2007 but before 29 December 2008; and (b) fails to submit the results to the licensing authority on or before 29 June 2009 as required by article 46(1) of the paediatric regulation, shall be guilty of an offence.
No criminal offences have been abolished by secondary legislation since 1 May 2008.
Diabetes
(2) what the cost of treating diabetes in adults was in each of the last five years.
Estimates of national health service expenditure on diabetes are available from the programme budgeting returns. However, the programme budget returns do not contain age-specific data relating to the treatment of diabetes.
The following table shows the estimated gross level expenditure for diabetes from 2004-08 in England. These figures include primary care trust, Department of Health (DH), strategic health authority and special health authority expenditure. It should be noted that these figures do not include prevention expenditure or general medical services/primary medical services expenditure. This is considerable, but we cannot quantify it separately.
Diabetes expenditure (£) DH gross expenditure (£) Diabetes as a proportion of gross expenditure (Percentage) 2004-05 687,402 71,922,179 1.0 2005-06 866,000 80,185,241 1.1 2006-07 1,043,021 84,193,209 1.2 2007-08 1,151,183 93,183,426 1.2
Diabetes: Young People
(2) how many 16 to 24-year-olds in (a) England, (b) Leicester and (c) the East Midlands have been diagnosed with (i) type 1 diabetes and (ii) type 2 diabetes.
The data requested are not collected routinely, as participation in the National Diabetes Audit (NDA) is not mandatory. The NDA does not have 100 per cent. coverage or participation and therefore cannot provide the information required.
Data from “Growing Up with Diabetes: children and young people with diabetes in England” reported that in February 2009 there were 4,917 people aged 16 and 17 in England with diabetes and 331 people aged 16 and 17 in the East Midlands Strategic Health Authority (SHA) with diabetes.
Of the 4,917 people aged 16 and 17 in England with diabetes, 4,629 had type 1 diabetes and 288 had type 2 diabetes. In the East Midlands SHA there were 313 people aged 16 and 17 with type 1 diabetes and 18 people aged 16 and 17 with type 2 diabetes.
This survey did not collect data on people aged 18 and over and data are only available by SHA.
Dietary Supplements: EC Law
The implementation of the Food Supplements Directive and Nutrition and Health Claims Regulation was last raised with the authorities of Guernsey and Jersey in September 2009. No further meetings are currently planned.
Disabled: Social Security Benefits
(2) whether all (a) existing and (b) future claimants of (i) attendance allowance and (ii) disability living allowance who are over the age of 65 will have the option of continuing to be able to receive their benefit in cash via a direct payment from a future national care service.
If disability benefits for older people are reformed as part of the introduction of the National Care Service, people receiving the affected benefits at the time of reform will continue to receive the same level of cash support. We do not anticipate that these people will need to agree a care plan in order to access this cash support.
As we said in the Green Paper, if we were to draw some disability benefits for older people into the new National Care Service, we would create a new offer for individuals with care needs. This support would be delivered in line with the best principles of benefits; a system that is consistent across the country, flexible methods of payment and investment in prevention.
Health Services: Gloucestershire
The information is not held in the format requested.
Figures on how much has been spent on health care services in the Gloucestershire primary care trust (PCT) area from 2002-03 to 2008-09 are given in the following table. These are the only years for which the information is available by organisation.
£000 Primary health care Secondary health care Other health care 2008-09 191,546 589,362 1,188 2007-08 182,552 559,397 625 2006-07 177,393 499,992 2,749 2005-06 164,813 491,882 1,151 2004-05 153,618 451,735 1,023 2003-04 128,961 383,058 610 2002-03 100,199 355,689 473 Notes: 1. The figures represent the total primary, secondary and other health care purchased and provided for the PCT's resident population, with the exception of primary dental and general ophthalmic services since these costs are not directly attributed to PCTs on the basis of a patient's place of residence. 2. ‘Other healthcare’ as defined in the audited summarisation schedules is taken to include expenditure for national health service trust impairments, plus grants to other bodies for health related capital projects under joint working arrangements. Source: Audited summarisation schedules 2002-03 to 2008-09
The information requested is not collected centrally.
Health Services: Overseas Visitors
Residents of the European economic area and Switzerland visiting the United Kingdom (UK) are entitled, free of charge, to all necessary national health service hospital treatment.
Under European regulations, where visitors carry a valid European Health Insurance Card the UK can then reclaim the cost of that treatment from the citizen’s home member state.
Health Services: Reciprocal Arrangements
(2) how much has been reclaimed by the NHS for healthcare carried out in England in respect of nationals of other countries with which the UK has a reciprocal agreement in the last 12-month period for which figures are available.
The United Kingdom does not claim reimbursement for UK citizens treated in other countries on the basis of bilateral health care agreements, as the costs are incurred in the country that provided the health care, and not in the UK.
Similarly, countries with which the UK has a bilateral health care agreement do not claim reimbursement from the UK for treatment provided in the UK to their citizens, as the costs are incurred in the UK, and not in the citizen’s home country.
European regulations provide for the UK to reclaim costs from the European economic area and Switzerland for health care provided to their citizens, and vice versa.
Hospital Wards: Greater London
The information requested is not collected centrally. Information on the different types of ward may be obtained from the national health service locally.
Ice Skating: Injuries
The information is not available in the format requested. Information for hospital admissions involving ice-skates, skis, roller-skates or skateboards by North West Strategic Health Authority (SHA) and primary care trust (PCT) of residence is shown in the following table:
SHA/PCT of residence description 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 North West SHA 561 642 474 Blackburn with Darwen PCT 18 13 12 Salford PCT 9 22 8 Stockport PCT 32 32 19 Ashton, Leigh and Wigan PCT 27 35 12 Blackpool PCT 14 12 19 Bolton PCT 13 24 19 Warrington PCT 20 17 23 Knowsley PCT 14 9 8 Oldham PCT 28 26 20 Bury PCT 13 11 9 Tameside and Glossop PCT 12 19 16 Cumbria PCT 34 20 27 North Lancashire PCT 31 29 26 Central Lancashire PCT 53 51 33 East Lancashire Teaching PCT 44 51 30 Sefton PCT 23 30 21 Wirral PCT 22 28 25 Liverpool PCT 25 38 22 Halton and St. Helens PCT 19 33 22 Western Cheshire PCT 23 30 11 Central and Eastern Cheshire PCT 33 51 38 Heywood, Middleton and Rochdale PCT 16 11 8 Trafford PCT 21 22 20 Manchester PCT 17 28 26 Notes: 1 Full time equivalent figures are rounded to the nearest whole number. 2 A supplementary code that indicates the nature of any external cause of injury, poisoning or other adverse effects. Only the first external cause code which is coded within the episode is counted in HES. Cause code used: W02—Fall involving ice-skates, skis, roller-skates or skateboards. 3 The SHA or PCT containing the patient’s normal home address. This does not necessarily reflect where the patient was treated as they may have travelled to another SHA/PCT for treatment. Source: The NHS information centre for health and social care.
Multiple Sclerosis
The National Service Framework for long-term neurological conditions, published in 2005, estimated there were between 52-62,000 people in the United Kingdom with this condition.
Multiple Sclerosis: Nurses
This nurse specialty is not identified separately on the NHS work force census.
NHS: Internet
As at 15 December 2009, there were 6,004 live United Kingdom websites with the nhs.uk suffix. 3,985 of these were live records within the English national health service web estate. The remainder have been allocated by the devolved Administrations.
These numbers are constantly changing as new websites are created and old websites decommissioned.
Nottingham Hospital: Manpower
The information is not available in the format requested. However, data for the Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust are set out in the following table.
Headcount As at 30 September each year 1997 2008 Qualified Nursing staff 3,099 3,770 Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust 1,442 n/a Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University NHS Trust 1,657 n/a Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust — 3,770 Medical and Dental staff 967 1,371 Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust 371 n/a Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University NHS Trust 596 n/a Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust — 1,371 n/a = Not applicable. Note: In 2006 Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust merged with Queens Medical Centre Nottingham University NHS Trust to become Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust. Therefore data have been provided for Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust in 2008 and its component parts in 1997. Data Quality Workforce statistics are compiled from data sent by more than 300 NHS trusts and primary care trusts in England. The Information Centre for health and social care liaises closely with these organisations to encourage submission of complete and valid data and seeks to minimise inaccuracies and the effect of missing and invalid data. Processing methods and procedures are continually being updated to improve data quality. Where this happens any impact on figures already published will be assessed but unless this is significant at national level they will not be changed. Where there is impact only at detailed or local level this will be footnoted in relevant analyses. Source: Medical and Dental Workforce Census, The Information Centre for health and social care
Offenders
The Department has no central records of any members of staff of the core Department who have been convicted of a criminal offence while a serving civil servant since 1997.
Where such reports as these involve less than five cases, the Department follows Cabinet Office guidelines and does not publicly report specific figures on the grounds of confidentiality. With such small numbers the individuals concerned might be personally identified with possible legal consequences. A number of such cases have occurred in the Department’s agencies but the total number of those cases are less than five.
Social Services
If disability benefits for older people are reformed as part of the National Care Service, those receiving the affected benefits at the time of reform would continue to receive the same level of cash support. We will give more details about the National Care Service offer in our White Paper later this year.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave to him on 10 December 2009, Official Report, column 552W.
These discussions and clearances took place between early September and November 2009.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave him on 14 December 2009, Official Report, column 763W.
Social Services: Reform
(2) whether social care provision commissioned by primary care trusts will be exempt from means-testing;
(3) what powers he plans to provide for NHS commissioners to commission social care;
(4) what uplift he expects each primary care trust to receive consequent on the takeover of social care provision by primary care trusts;
(5) what plans he has to transfer (a) control over provision and (b) responsibility for funding of social care to primary care trusts;
(6) what plans he has for the future role of the NHS in respect of control over provision of social care; and if he will make a statement.
Both “NHS 2010-15; good to great”, a copy of which has already been placed in the Library, and “The NHS operating framework for England for 2010/11” emphasised the importance of the NHS working together with its partners to deliver joined-up services around people's needs and support people to stay healthy and independent. Neither document suggested structural changes to accountability or governance.
A copy of the framework has been placed in the Library.
Surgery: Greater London
Information is not collected in the format requested. However, the following table shows the number of finished consultant episodes (FCEs) in which an elective procedure or intervention, including but not limited to elective surgery, was performed. A finished consultant episode is a continuous period of admitted patient care under one consultant within one health care provider. Figures do not represent the number of different patients, since one patient may have more than one episode of care within the same stay at hospital, or in different stays within the same year.
FCEs where an elective procedure or intervention was performed Bexley PCT Bromley PCT Greenwich PCT 2008-09 25,073 45,177 26,982 2007-08 23,585 38,565 26,170 2006-07 23,824 34,937 25,565 Notes: 1. Commissioning responsibility for individual patients rests with the primary care trust (PCT) with whom the patient is registered. This means that patients with a general practitioner (GP) in one PCT area may reside in a neighbouring or other area but remain the responsibility of the PCT with whom their GP of registration is associated. PCTs are also responsible for non-registered patients who are resident within their boundaries. 2. A main elective procedure or intervention is the first recorded procedure or intervention in each episode, usually the most resource intensive procedure or intervention performed during the episode. Source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), The NHS Information Centre for health and social care
Surgery: Nottingham
This information is not available in the format requested. Data on finished consultant episodes1 (FCEs) are collected by primary care trust (PCT) of responsibility2, the commissioning PCT, not by constituency.
The number of FCEs where there was a main procedure3 with Nottingham City as the PCT of responsibility in 2008-08 and 1997-98 is shown in the following table. This includes activity in national health service hospitals in England and English NHS commissioned activity in the independent sector.
1 An FCE is a continuous period of admitted patient care under one consultant within one health care provider. FCEs are counted against the year in which they end. Figures do not represent the number of different patients, as a person may have more than one episode of care within the same stay in hospital or in different stays in the same year.
2 PCT of responsibility—this is a derived field providing the PCT responsible for the patient. The commissioning responsibility for individual patients rests with the PCT with whom the patient is registered. Therefore, this is based on the postcode of the patient’s general practitioner (GP). This means that patients with a GP in one PCT area may reside in a neighbouring or other area but remain the responsibility of the PCT with whom their GP of registration is associated. PCTs are also responsible for non-registered patients who are resident within their boundaries.
3 Main procedure—the first recorded procedure or intervention in each episode (Operating Procedure Code Supplement codes AOO to X97), usually the most resource intensive procedure or intervention performed during the episode. It is appropriate to use main procedure when looking at admission details, (e.g. time waited), but a more complete count of episodes with a particular procedure is obtained by looking at the main and the secondary procedures.
Finished consultant episodes 2008-09 46,357 1997-98 39,152 Source: Hospital Episode Statistics, The Information Centre for health and social care
Surgery: Obesity
Data on finished consultant episodes with a primary diagnosis of obesity as well as a main or secondary procedure of bariatric surgery for England and each health authority or regional area are provided in the following table. Data are available for each year from 1997-98 to 2008-09.
The NHS Information Centre has provided slightly revised data to those previously provided for the years 1997-98 to 2006-07 following a revision of the definition of bariatric surgery.
Count of Finished Consultant Episodes1 with a primary diagnosis2 of obesity4 and a main or secondary procedure3 of bariatric surgery4 broken down by SHA of residence5 for 1997-98 to 2008-09—Activity in English national health service hospitals and English NHS commissioned activity in the independent sectorStrategic health authority (SHA)2008-092007-082006-072005-062004-052003-042002-032001-022000-011999-20001998-991997-98England total4,2212,6951,9341,032736469340280257196196148Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire SHAQ01———402512967246Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire SHAQ02———28189687232Essex SHAQ03———12137535411North West London SHAQ04———6946111357311North Central London SHAQ05———2916125235—2North East London SHAQ06———2410431212—South East London SHAQ07———3227181113181143South West London SHAQ08———3322111158724Northumberland, Tyne and Wear SHAQ09———583323119881010County Durham and Tees Valley SHAQ10———21157576342North and East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire SHAQ11———13663372019815124West Yorkshire SHAQ12———595165403856423130Cumbria and Lancashire SHAQ13———131817111491477Greater Manchester SHAQ14———202115949576Cheshire and Merseyside SHAQ15———833324136247188Thames Valley SHAQ16———13969674——Hampshire and Isle of Wight SHAQ17———243—1—342Kent and Medway SHAQ18———12185594333Surrey and Sussex SHAQ19———3321161313975—Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire SHAQ20———57191213—334South West Peninsula SHAQ21———332213122471265Dorset and Somerset SHAQ22———3113431422—South Yorkshire SHAQ23———1078863432422151723Trent SHAQ24———8542202214146710Leicestershire, Northamptonshire and Rutland SHAQ25———193311824—53Shropshire and Staffordshire SHAQ26———23211811333113Birmingham and the Black Country SHAQ27———25201210737257West Midlands South SHAQ28———9156323222North East SHAQ30268217132—————————North West SHAQ313167577————————— Yorkshire and the Humber SHAQ32584491439—————————East Midlands SHAQ33550279205—————————West Midlands SHAQ34445345244—————————East of England SHAQ3524311787—————————London SHAQ36909582299—————————South East Coast SHAQ37446281139—————————South Central SHAQ38157127110—————————South West SHAQ39302181202—————————England—Not otherwise specifiedU100100010000Other, foreign and unknown SHAs522412624291210961071 Finished Consultant Episode (FCE)A FCE is a continuous period of admitted patient care under one consultant within one healthcare provider. FCEs are counted against the year in which they end. Figures do not represent the number of different patients, as a person may have more than one episode of care within the same stay in hospital or in different stays in the same year.2 Primary diagnosisThe primary diagnosis is the first of up to 20 (14 from 2002-03 to 2006-07 and seven prior to 2002-03) diagnosis fields in the HES data set and provides the main reason why the patient was admitted to hospital. 3 Number of episodes with a (named) main or secondary procedure The number of episodes where the procedure (or intervention) was recorded in any of the 24 (12 from 2002-03 to 2006-07 and four prior to 2002-03) procedure fields in a HES record. A record is only included once in each count, even if the procedure is recorded in more than one procedure field of the record. Note that more procedures are carried out than episodes with a main or secondary procedure. For example, patients under going a ‘cataract operation’ would tend to have at least two procedures—removal of the faulty lens and the fitting of a new one—counted in a single episode.4 Obesity and Bariatric Surgery CodesObesity: ICD-10 code used for obesity was E66.Bariatric Surgery Procedure Codes:Recent guidance from the standards and classification team at Connecting for Health has led to a revision of the definition for ‘Bariatric Surgery’. Due to these changes revised data has been provided. (See: OPCS-4 explanatory notes for more details on the bariatric surgery procedure codes)The OPCS-4 procedure codes below are used to denote bariatric surgery.The OPCS-4 procedure codes (1996-97 to 2005-06, and 2006-07 to 2008-09) are: G28.1, G28.2, G28.3, G28.8, G28.9, G30.1, G30.2, G30.8, G30.9, G31.1, G31.2, G31.3, G31.4, G31.8, G31.9, G31.0, G32.1, G32.2, G32.3, G32.8, G32.9, G32.0, G33.1, G33.2, G33.3, G33.8, G33.9, G33.0, G38.8, G48.1, G48.2. The following additional four digit OPCS-4 codes have been added due to the use of OPCS-4.3 in 2006-07 data:G28.4, G28.5, G30.3, G30.4, G31.5, G31.6, G32.4, G32.5, G33.5, G33.6, G38.7, G71.6Additional OPCS-4.4 codes used for the 2007-08 and 2008-09 data are: G27.1, G27.2, G27.3, G27.4, G27.5,G27.8 and G27.9.5 SHA/primary care trust (PCT) of residenceThe SHA or PCT containing the patient’s normal home address. This does not necessarily reflect where the patient was treated as they may have travelled to another SHA/PCT for treatment. PCT/SHA data qualityIn July 2006, the NHS reorganised SHA and PCT in England from 28 SHAs into 10, and from 303 PCTs into 152. As a result data from 2006-07 onwards are not directly comparable with previous years. Data have been presented for those SHA/PCTs which have valid data for the breakdown presented here. As a result some SHA/PCTs may be missing from the list provided.Assessing growth through timeHES figures are available from 1989-90 onwards. Changes to the figures over time need to be interpreted in the context of improvements in data quality and coverage (particularly in earlier years), improvements in coverage of independent sector activity (particularly from 2006-07) and changes in NHS practice. For example, apparent reductions in activity may be due to a number of procedures which may now be undertaken in outpatient settings and so no longer include in admitted patient HES data.Strategic Health Authority ConfigurationIn 2006-07 there was a SHA configuration change, where 28 SHAs merged into 10. For this reason, 2006-07 is based on the new configuration.Bariatric Surgery Procedure Codes:The OPCS-4 procedure codes below are used to denote bariatric surgery.The OPCS-4 procedure codes (1996-97 to 2005-06, and 2006-07 to 2008-09) are:G28.1 Partial gastrectomy and anastomosis of stomach to duodenumG28.2 Partial gastrectomy and anastomosis of stomach to transposed jejunumG28.3 Partial gastrectomy and anastomosis of stomach jejunum necG28.8 Other specific partial excision of stomachG28.9 Unspecified partial excision of stomachG30.1 Gastroplasty necG30.2 Partitioning of stomach necG30.8 Other specified plastic operations on stomachG30.9 Unspecified plastic operations on stomachG31.1 Bypass of stomach by anastomosis of oesophagus to duodenumG31.2 Bypass of stomach by anastomosis of stomach to duodenumG31.3 Revision of anastomosis of stomach to duodenumG31.4 Conversion to anastomosis of stomach to duodenumG31.8 Other specified connection of stomach to duodenumG31.9 Unspecified connection of stomach to duodenumG31.0 Conversion from previous anastomosis of stomach to duodenumG32.1 Bypass of stomach by anastomosis of stomach to transposed jejunumG32.2 Revision of anastomosis of stomach to transposed jejunumG32.3 Conversion to anastomosis of stomach to transposed jejunumG32.8 Other specified connection of stomach to transposed jejunumG32.9 Unspecified connection of stomach to transposed jejunumG32.0 Conversion from previous anastomosis of stomach to transposed jejunumG33.1 Bypass of stomach by anastomosis of stomach to jejunum necG33.2 Revision of anastomosis of stomach to jejunum necG33.3 Conversion of anastomosis of stomach to jejunum nec G33.8 Other specified other connection of stomach to jejunumG33.9 Unspecified other connection of stomach to jejunumG33.0 Conversion from previous anastomosis of stomach to jejunum necG38.8 Other specified other open operations on stomachG48.1 Insertion of gastric bubbleG48.2 Attention to gastric bubbleThe following additional four digit OPCS-4 codes have been added due to the use of OPCS-4.3 in 2006-07 data:G28.4 Sleeve gastrectomy and duodenal switchG28.5 Sleeve gastrectomy necG30.3 Partitioning of stomach using bandG30.4 Partitioning of stomach using staplesG31.5 Closure of connection of stomach and duodenumG31.6 Attention to connection of stomach and duodenumG32.4 Closure of connection of stomach to transposed jejunumG32.5 Attention to connection of stomach to transposed jejunumG33.5 Closure of connection of stomach to jejunum necG33.6 Attention to connection of stomach to jejunumG38.7 Removal of gastric bandG71.6 Duodenal switchAdditional OPCS-4.4 codes used for the 2007-08 and 2008-09 data are:G27.1 Total gastrectomy and excision of surrounding tissueG27.2 Total gastrectomy and anastomosis of oesophagus to duodenumG27.3 Total gastrectomy and interposition of jejunumG27.4 Total gastrectomy and anastomosis of oesophagus to transposed jejunumG27.5 Total gastrectomy and anastomosis of oesophagus to jejunum necG27.8 Other specified total excision of stomachG27.9 Unspecified total excision of stomachSource:Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), The NHS Information Centre for health and social care
Energy and Climate Change
Fuel Poverty
The estimated number of households in fuel poverty in the UK was around 2 million in 2003. The latest year for which figures are available is for 2007 and this shows that there were around 4 million fuel- poor households in the UK.
The most recently available sub-regional split of fuel poverty relates to 2006, and shows that there were around 2,600 fuel-poor households in the Billericay constituency. In 2003 there were around 2,400 fuel-poor households in the Billericay constituency.
We are aware of the challenges that exist for households off the gas main. To help address this:
Ofgem has incentivised large gas networks to provide connections to deprived households off the network;
CERT provides incentives for energy suppliers to promote heat pumps in off-gas-grid vulnerable properties;
Warm Front in England is piloting air source heat pumps, and
The forthcoming Renewable Heat Incentive has the potential to benefit off-gas-grid consumers.
Fuel Poverty: Older People
The Government have a strong package of measures to help reduce fuel poverty among vulnerable households which includes the elderly. This is centred on tackling the three root causes of fuel poverty:
Reducing the demand for energy by improving home energy efficiency through schemes such as Warm Front and equivalents in the devolved Administrations, CERT, CESP and Decent Homes;
Ensuring competitive energy prices through a robust system of regulation aimed to protect all consumers; and
Raising real incomes, including winter fuel and cold weather payments alongside the wider tax and benefit system and through benefit entitlement checks. We have introduced legislation to implement mandated social price support schemes once the current voluntary agreement with suppliers comes to an end and have said that we are minded to focus the majority of the additional resources on older pensioner households on the lowest incomes.
Climate Change: Scientific Evidence
DECC includes a dedicated team of climate specialists who keep the scientific evidence under review. The AVOID research programme on avoiding dangerous climate change recently assessed the scientific research published since the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Fourth Assessment Report. The findings informed the UK delegation ahead of Copenhagen. Expert advice is also obtained from the UK and wider academic research community and through the Integrated Climate Programme at the Met Office Hadley Centre.
Climate Change: Copenhagen
The Accord agreed in Copenhagen marks the start of a new phase in tackling climate change. Major developed and developing countries committed to further action, including reaching agreement on the need to limit global warming to 2 degrees. The UK will now work to convert the measures agreed at Copenhagen into a comprehensive legally binding agreement.
Biofuels
[holding answer 6 January 2010]: The Government’s approach to defining sustainability criteria for biomass is set out in the UK Renewable Energy Strategy, launched in July.
We are awaiting the European Commission’s report on the requirement for a sustainability scheme for solid and gaseous biomass used for heat and electricity, which was due by 31 December 2009. This report will be accompanied, where appropriate, with proposals to the European Parliament and Council.
We will then consider this report and its implications for introducing sustainability criteria for the biomass used for heat and electricity in the UK.
Boilers
[holding answer 6 January 2010]: Liquefied petroleum gas boilers are eligible for this scheme if they meet the criteria on age and efficiency.
BP: Canvey Island
I have been asked to reply:
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has made no assessment of the effects on the use of the local road network of BP Oil UK Ltd.’s contract to lease storage facilities at Oikos Storage Ltd.’s site on Canvey Island.
Oikos will remain the operator of this site for the purposes of the Control of Major Accident Hazards Regulations 1999 (COMAH) and will have overall responsibility for safety throughout the duration of the BP contract. HSE's role is to monitor safety at the site. HSE will continue to do this and will assess any significant changes that Oikos make to the site and to the site's COMAH safety report as a result of the implementation of the BP contract. As part of their responsibilities under COMAH, Oikos are expected to identify and assess hazards and risks associated with the transport of hazardous substances that could lead to major accidents at the site.
HSE understands that hazardous materials will be transferred to and from the Oikos site though underground pipelines throughout the duration of the BP contract. The safety of any hazardous materials transported by road in, for example, road tankers, would be covered by the Carriage of Dangerous Goods and Use of Transportable Pressure Regulations 2009 enforced by the police and the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA).
Carbon Sequestration
We have announced support for what is expected to be one of the world's first commercial-scale demonstrations of CCS on a coal-fired power station, and recently confirmed our intention to support a total of four demonstration projects.
We have supported extensive research to help understand the potential of CCS internationally and domestically. We have created one of the world's first legal frameworks to allow the safe storage of carbon dioxide and address the problem of long-term liability associated with storage sites.
Climate Change: British Overseas Territories
I refer the hon. Member to the oral statement made by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change regarding the Copenhagen climate summit outcomes on 5 January 2010, Official Report, column 42. As the statement suggested, we are continuing to reflect on the implications of the outcome of COP15 for the UK and for the Overseas Territories and are liaising with them directly over that.
Climate Change: International Cooperation
The UK negotiates as part of the EU and therefore all formal submissions we have made to the UNFCCC have been as part of the EU. The EU made one submission during the Copenhagen climate change conference—the EU presented its fifth national communication under the UNFCCC on 7 December. A copy is available in the Library of the House. I refer the hon. Member to the Secretary of State’s statement of 5 January 2010, Official Report, column 42, on the outcomes of the Copenhagen climate change conference.
Two Ministers and 36 officials from the Department of Energy and Climate Change attended the Copenhagen climate change conference as part of the UK delegation. The total cost to the UK taxpayer is not yet known, but current estimates suggest a rough costing of £350,000. This includes expenses for non-DECC members of the UK delegation which are covered from DECC's budgets, such as office space and land transportation.
I refer the hon. Member to the oral statement made by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change on 5 January 2010, Official Report, column 42, regarding the Copenhagen climate conference outcomes.
Departmental Disclosure of Information
There have been no known allegations of victimisation for whistleblowing reported by departmental staff since the inception of DECC on 3 October 2008.
Departmental Legislation
The offences we have identified include:
The Transfrontier shipments of radioactive waste and spent fuel regulations 2008 (SI 2008/3087)
The Transfrontier shipments of radioactive waste and spent fuel regulations 2008 (SI 2008/3087) continue to implement council directive 96/29/Euratom laying down basic standards for the protection of the health of workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionizing radiation, and implement directive 2006/117/Euratom on the supervision and control of shipments of radioactive waste and spent fuel. The regulations create several offences relating to the transfrontier shipment of radioactive waste or spent fuel without an authorisation granted by the Environment Agency (in England and Wales), the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (in Scotland) or the chief inspector appointed under the Radioactive Substances Act 1993 (in Northern Ireland).
Regulation 4(1) creates an offence of shipping radioactive waste or spent fuel to a destination outside the United Kingdom, or into the United Kingdom from a third country (except by way of transit), except in accordance with an authorisation. Regulation 4(2) creates an offence of shipping radioactive waste or spent fuel into the United Kingdom from another European member state except under the authority of an authorisation granted by that member state.
Regulation 5(1) creates an offence of shipping radioactive waste or spent fuel into the United Kingdom from a third country by way of transit to another member state except in accordance with an authorisation granted by the member state of destination.
Regulation 5(2) creates an offence of shipping radioactive waste or spent fuel into the United Kingdom from a third country for transit to another third country except in accordance with an authorisation by the UK authorities, or where relevant by the other member state.
Regulation 8(2) creates an offence of failing to notify the authorities within 15 days that a consignment of radioactive waste or spent fuel from outside the UK has been received.
Regulation 9(4) creates an offence of failing to notify the authorities that radioactive waste or spent fuel consigned from the UK to a different country has arrived, within 15 days of that arrival.
Regulation 10(2) creates an offence of failing to ensure that a shipment of radioactive waste or spent fuel is accompanied by the correct documents.
Regulation 11(2) creates an offence of making a false or misleading statement in an application under the regulations for authorisation in relation to shipping radioactive waste or spent fuel.
Regulation 14(3) creates an offence of failure to comply with an instruction of the authorities to return a consignment of radioactive waste or spent fuel to the country of origin, or to otherwise dispose of it.
Regulation 14(4)(b) creates an offence of failing to comply with a notice requiring the holder of an authorisation to take back any radioactive waste or spent fuel that has been sent out of the United Kingdom.
Regulation 15(2) creates an offence of failing to comply with a notice sent by the authorities requiring that information is sent or that actions are taken or are not taken in relation to the shipment of radioactive waste or spent fuel.
The regulations also revoke the “Transfrontier Shipment of Radioactive Waste Regulations 1993 (SI 1993/3031)” which contained in regulation 18 a set of offences which were similar in nature to the above new offences (although they did not apply to spent fuel).
Criminal Jurisdiction (Application to Offshore Energy Installation etc) Order 2009
Although not creating any new criminal offences, this order extends the existing criminal law regime in England and Wales and Scotland for acts or omissions that take place on and around a renewable energy installation in the UK’s renewable energy zone.
Departmental Pay
An element of the Department of Energy and Climate Change’s overall pay award is allocated to non-consolidated variable pay related to performance. These payments are used to drive high performance and form part of the pay award for members of staff who demonstrate exceptional performance, for example by exceeding targets set or meeting challenging objectives.
Non-consolidated variable pay awards are funded from within existing pay bill controls, and have to be re-earned each year against pre-determined targets and, as such, do not add to future pay bill costs.
The total amount of non-consolidated variable pay paid to civil servants in DECC from January to August 2009 inclusive (the latest figures available) is £484,000.
Departmental Training
The information requested is not available centrally and could be made available only at disproportional cost.
Natural Gas
[holding answer 8 December 2009]: This limit is set in the Gas Safety (Management) Regulations 1996 (SI 1996 No. 551), at schedule 3/part 1. Those regulations were made, by the then Department of the Environment, on the advice of the HSE. Subsequently the then Department for Business and Regulatory Reform consulted on future arrangements for Great Britain’s gas quality specifications, and concluded that there was not a case for seeking change to the GS(M)R. Gas quality, and the process for seeking flexibility under the current statutory arrangements, is again discussed in a document just published by my Department, entitled “Biomethane into the Gas Network: A Guide for Producers”; this is available at:
http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/what_we_do/uk_supply/markets/gas_markets/nonconvention/nonconvention.aspx
Natural Gas: Storage
National Grid's "Ten Year Statement 2009" (published in December) shows 0.53 bcm of storage capacity under construction, and expected to commission by 2011-12.
Renewable Energy
The Government are developing and demonstrating successful models of community engagement through the ‘Low Carbon Communities Challenge’; phase 1 winners were announced on 21 December. We are also setting effective financial subsidy levels through feed-in tariffs and the renewable heat incentive to benefit communities.
Renewable Energy: Heating
We are currently working on the development of the renewable heat incentive scheme which will provide financial incentives to encourage renewable heat generation at all scales. We plan to publish our consultation on the scheme shortly. Details of how the scheme will operate will be set out in the consultation.
Sellafield: Waste Management
The Department has regular contact with the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA), its nuclear sites and other interested stakeholders. Government recognise the importance of managing radioactive waste to the highest environmental, security and safety standards and work closely with the NDA to ensure that this is done achieving best value for money consistent with those standards.
Warm Front Scheme: East Sussex
In 2008-09, 322 households in Lewes constituency and 2,921 in East Sussex county council area received assistance from the Warm Front scheme.
Warm Front Scheme: Stroud
The following table details the amount spent by the Warm Front scheme each year in Stroud since June 2005.
£ 2005-06 180,242 2006-07 325,327 2007-08 347,282 2008-09 471,998 2009-101 617,018 1 Up to 30 November 2009.
The Government have a strong package of national programmes aimed at encouraging greater energy efficiency measures and reducing the level of fuel poverty. The combination of Warm Front, the Carbon Emissions Reduction Target (CERT), Community Energy Savings Programme (CESP), Decent Homes and local programmes delivered through local government, partnerships, energy suppliers, Eaga and National Energy Action (such as Warm Zones and the Community Energy Efficiency Fund) are all important in tackling fuel poverty and encouraging greater energy efficiency across England.
In December 2009, my Department announced the launch of the Home Energy Pay As You Save (PAYS) pilots. Stroud district council in partnership with Severn Wye Energy Agency will deliver a PAYS pilot project to householders within the Stroud area. The PAYS pilot will give households the opportunity to invest in energy efficiency and microgeneration technologies in their homes with no up-front cost. Householders will make repayments spread over a long enough period so that repayments are lower than their predicted energy bill savings, meaning financial and carbon savings are made from day one.
Wind Power
In 2008 1.8 per cent. of UK electricity generation was from wind power1. Provisional figures for the first three quarters of 2009 indicate that in this period 2.2 per cent. of electricity generated in the UK was from wind2.
The following table sets out the number of operational wind turbines in the UK as at November 2009. In addition, it is estimated that there are approximately 12,000 micro-wind turbines in the UK.
1Source:
Table 5.6 Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics (DUKES) 2009
(http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/statistics/publications/dukes/dukes.aspx).
2Source:
Table 5.1 Energy Trends
(http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/statistics/source/electricity/electricity.aspx).
Onshore Offshore Total Greater than 50kW 2,617 1207 2,824 Less than 50kW 225 n/a 225 Total 2,842 207 3,049 1Does not include the Beatrice offshore wind demonstrator project which is outside UK territorial waters. Source: AEA Technology.
Wind Power: Noise
[holding answer 6 January 2010]: The 43 decibel night-time limit in the ETSU-R-97 guidance is derived from the 35 dB(A) sleep disturbance criteria referred to in Planning Policy Guidance 24 (Planning and Noise). An addition of 10 dB(A) was made to the 35 dB(A) figure to allow for attenuation through an open window, and 2 dB subtracted to account for the use of LA90 rather than LAeq. ETSU-R-97 has not been formally reviewed, but other aspects of wind turbine noise have been subject to a number of studies including the 2006 research by Hayes McKenzie.
In relation to the Hayes McKenzie research, I understand that the reference to the decibel levels was not included in the final report because the consultants decided that referring to a specific level (as in the first draft of the report) did not reflect the terms of reference of the study.
Written Questions: Government Responses
[holding answer 10 December 2009]: I responded to the hon. Member on 16 December 2009, Official Report, column 1334W.