Written Answers to Questions
Thursday 25 March 2010
Scotland
Departmental Buildings
The Scotland Office does not have any gym facilities.
Wales
Departmental Buildings
Departmental Written Questions
When deciding whether a response to a parliamentary question is likely to incur disproportionate cost my staff consult the relevant Cabinet Office guidance, paragraphs 7.26 - 7.31.
Rape Complaints Review
It is important to make clear that Baroness Stern's Review of Rape Reporting recognises that there has been real progress made to tackle sexual violence in our society. However, it also recognises that more still needs to be done and the UK Government are carefully considering the report and its twenty three recommendations to determine the best way forward. We will be establishing an action plan to address the issues raised by Baroness Stern and will be discussing this plan with all stakeholders, including the Welsh Assembly Government.
I, and my office, remain committed to ensuring that all parties continue to co-operate and build upon the good foundations that have already been laid; and that we continue to support victims, challenge attitudes and further improve the response of the criminal justice system and health service.
Northern Ireland
Departmental Written Questions
The Northern Ireland Office (NIO) seeks to answer all parliamentary questions that do not incur disproportionate cost. Disproportionate cost is determined via a disproportionate cost threshold (DCT). The current DCT is £800, announced in Parliament by the Treasury on 20 January 2010, Official Report, column 15WS.
Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission: Pay
The amount paid in bonuses to staff of the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission in each for the last five years was as follows:
£ 2005-06 0 2006-07 0 2007-08 5,421 2008-09 3,056 2009-10 7,306
Defence
Animal Welfare Advisory Committee
The Animal Welfare Advisory Committee last met on 20 March 2007. The work of the Committee duplicates the work of the Home Office in regulating animal welfare, which the MOD fully complies with.
Armed Forces: Eyesight
(2) whether members of the armed forces who have had laser eye surgery to achieve the required level of sight attainment are allowed to continue in service.
The following methods of surgical correction of myopia or hypermetropia are considered suitable for entry on an individual, case by case basis for non-specialist employment groups and subject to single service requirements:
Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK)
Laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK)
Laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK)
Intrastromal corneal rings (ICRs), otherwise known as intrastromal corneal segments (ICSs)
Recruits must fulfil certain criteria, including that at least 12 months have elapsed since the last procedure, that there are no significant visual side effects, and that refraction has stabilised.
Entry will not be considered for radial keratotomy (RK), or astigmatic keratotomy (AK), or any other form of incisional refractive surgery, other than those procedures listed above. All invasive intraocular surgical procedures remain a bar to entry.
The methods of surgical correction of myopia listed above for recruits may be considered suitable for serving personnel on an individual, case by case basis.
However, potential complications of the procedure may result in them being re-graded at a lower level of fitness, and significant deterioration in vision may require them to be re-graded as undeployable.
Exceptions to the above general policy apply in the case of some specialist employment groups, most notably aircrew. Aircrew are normally recruited before ocular maturity and at an age when Corneal Refractive Surgery (CRS) may not provide long-term refractive stability. Furthermore, the long-term outcome of CRS in trained aircrew needs to be evaluated before considering the procedure for potential aircrew. Therefore, candidates for recruitment to the armed forces as aircrew who have had CRS are rejected. There are no current plans to change this policy.
Serving aircrew in all three services are permitted to undertake certain forms of CRS currently including PRK or LASEK corrective surgery, with the consent and support of medical officers.
Armed Forces: Health Services
Detailed data will no longer be published where this would highlight potential pinch points within the armed forces, including the Defence Medical Services. I am withholding the information requested as its disclosure would, or would be likely to prejudice the capability, effectiveness or security of the armed forces.
In order to maintain appropriate external scrutiny of such data, the Department will continue to provide comprehensive manning data to the House of Commons Defence Committee on a confidential basis.
Armed Forces: Housing
(2) what defects there are in service family accommodation at (a) Calvary Crescent, (b) Broom Farm Estate and (c) Gratton Drive in Windsor; and what the (i) timetable and (ii) budget is for repairs to each;
(3) how often Modern Housing Solutions carries out customer satisfaction surveys; and when Modern Housing Solutions last conducted customer satisfaction surveys in Windsor;
(4) what assessment he has made of the effects of Modern Housing Solutions on the level of maintenance of service family accommodation.
The Housing Prime Contract (HPC), which covers the maintenance and repair of some 45,000 Service Family Accommodation (SFA) properties in England and Wales, has been delivered by Modern Housing Solutions (MHS) since 2006.
MHS provides a comprehensive service and continues to show a sustained level of performance against contractual targets. Over the last 12 months the following percentage of emergency, urgent and routine repairs were completed within the agreed contractual timescales.
Repair type Agreed timescale Percentage completed in timescale Emergency Attend within three hours 99 Urgent Attend within five working days 85 Routine Attend within 20 working days 91
The HPC streamlines the number of contracts and the supply chain, provides consistent processes and standards, allows for a single set of management data to assess performance, and the introduction of a 24-hour 365-day free phone helpdesk to provide a single point of contact for occupants.
MHS regularly surveys occupants by phone, via its website and through the completion of written questionnaires. Over the last 12 months, some 94 per cent. of occupants surveyed were satisfied with the service provided by the helpdesk and over 90 per cent. with the repair and maintenance service.
A breakdown by location of the number of complaints received, the level of customer satisfaction, the time taken to complete repair jobs and the budget or actual cost in each case cannot be readily identified from the overall data.
A list of all defects reported for SFA at the requested locations in Windsor is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Information relating to the longest, shortest and average time period taken to make repairs to accommodation in Windsor can be ascertained but will take more time to collate and verify. I will write to the hon. Member.
(2) what performance indicators have been set for Modern Housing Solutions in respect of its work on defence properties; and what assessment his Department has made of its performance against these targets in the last 12 months;
(3) what assessment has been made of the performance of Modern Housing Solutions in relation to its work at RAF Benson in the last 12 months.
Modern Housing Solutions (MHS) undertake a wide variety of repair and maintenance work on behalf of the Ministry of Defence (MOD). Key performance indicators relate to agreed contractual timescales for repairs. MHS are required to attend all emergency repairs within three hours and to make safe within 24 hours, to attend all urgent repairs within five working days and all routine repairs within 20 working days.
MHS regularly publish details of their performance against these and other targets on their website under ‘Progress Info for Occupants’:
www.modernhousingsolutions.com
In addition, MOD staff in Defence Estate, MHS and Station representatives meet at RAF Benson on a regular basis to review overall performance and any issues or areas, concerns or problems with specific locations would be discussed at that time.
While MHS record all complaints received, a breakdown by location cannot be readily identified from the overall data.
Armed Forces: Pensions
The applicability of the Armed Forces Pension Scheme 1975 to widows who remarry, and are subsequently divorced does not differentiate between Scottish law and the rest of the United Kingdom.
In order for an earlier pension, which has ceased due to remarriage, to restart the separation must be recognised in legal terms as divorced, dissolved or widowed and those administering the scheme with the authority of the Defence Council must be satisfied that the pension should become payable to the beneficiary for reasons of hardship.
Armed Forces: Rail Travel
Officers who hold the paid rank of OF3 (Lieutenant Commander, Major or Squadron Leader) and above, when travelling on duty, are entitled to travel first class.
However, restrictions are currently in place and regardless of entitlement, rail travel should be standard class, not first class. The exception, to be authorised by line managers, is if by booking ahead a first class fare can be obtained for less than the flexible standard fare.
Armed Forces: USA
The storage of US munitions on bases made available to the US Visiting Force is governed by a UK/US Memorandum of Agreement dated October 1997, entitled “The Import, Export, Transportation, Safety, Security, Storage and Disposal of US Explosives and Weapons in the UK and the Approval, Use and Safety of Ground Ranges”.
Cluster Munitions
Since the UK adopted the convention on cluster munitions in May 2008 there have been ongoing discussions with the US with regard to their cluster munition stockpiles and necessity of having stockpiles on UK territory. The US has identified the cluster munitions on UK territory as exceeding their worldwide operational planning requirements. Baroness Kinnock during the Cluster Munitions (Prohibitions) Bill Second Reading in the House of Lords on 8 December 2009, Official Report, column 1020, announced that these cluster munitions will be removed from sites in the UK in 2010 and from all UK territories by 2013.
The United States stores various weapons in the UK. The US inventory of weapons is declared annually to the Ministry of Defence who ensure that all weapons are appropriately licensed and stored. It would be inappropriate to disclose the numbers, types and locations of such weapons. Therefore, I am withholding the detailed information as its disclosure would or would be likely to prejudice relations between the United Kingdom and another state.
However, I can confirm that the US has identified their cluster munitions on UK territory as exceeding their worldwide operational planning requirements. Therefore, these cluster munitions will be removed from sites in the UK in 2010 and from all UK territories by 2013, as declared by Baroness Kinnock during the Cluster Munitions (Prohibitions) Bill Second Reading in the House of Lords on 8 December 2009, Official Report, column 1020.
The US has identified the cluster munitions on UK territory as exceeding their worldwide operational planning requirements. Baroness Kinnock during the Cluster Munitions (Prohibitions) Bill Second Reading in the House of Lords on 8 December 2009, Official Report, column 1020, announced that these cluster munitions will be removed from sites in the UK in 2010 and from all UK territories by 2013.
The only UK cluster munitions in service on 30 May 2008 were the Extended Range Bomblet Shell (ERBS) L20A1 M85 and the CRV-7 Multi-Purpose Sub Munition (MPSM). All other UK cluster munitions were withdrawn from service prior to this date.
Destruction of the CRV-7 MPSMs was completed in July 2009. We are in the process of competing the contract for the disposal of the ERBS L20A1 M85s and these are therefore awaiting destruction.
Departmental Buildings
The requested information is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
This information is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Departmental Freedom of Information
Statistics on requests for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 are published by the Ministry of Justice. Statistics for the quarter 1 October to 31 December 2009, and annual statistics for 2009, will be published by the Ministry of Justice on 29 April 2010. Releasing these statistics before this date would contravene the provisions of the Pre-release Access to Official Statistics Order which came into effect on 1 December 2008.
Statistics for the first three quarters of 2009 have been published by the Ministry of Justice, and relevant extracts are shown in the table. Information is collected on the number of requests which receive a response within the statutory response time of 20 working days, those which receive a response within permitted extensions to this period (“in time”), and those which have not been answered at the time of reporting to the Ministry of Justice. Information on the number of responses sent within 40 working days is not collected and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Period Requests received Full response sent within 20 working days Full response sent “in time” Response outstanding at time of reporting January to March 758 477 27 133 April to June 670 428 31 137 July to September 766 307 70 306
Departmental Press Releases
The central MOD Media and Communications unit records press releases by calendar year and in 2009 issued 296 press releases.
Records of press releases issued from other areas of the Department are not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Departmental Written Questions
The disproportionate cost threshold, which is the advisory cost limit at which Departments can refuse to answer a written PQ, is £800. It is calculated by reference to the cost to the Department of those involved in answering the question, specifically the personnel costs calculated on hourly rates. Answering questions of this formulation did not exceed this level.
Ex-servicemen: Prisoners
I refer the hon. Member to the answers given by the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice, my hon. Friend the Member for Liverpool, Garston (Maria Eagle) on 2 March 2010, Official Report, columns 1067-68W.
Group 4 Securicor
I refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave him on 22 March 2010, Official Report, column 14W.
Gurkhas: Immigration
(2) which Gurkha charities have received funding from his Department following the decision to grant ex-Gurkhas UK settlement rights; and how much such funding each of those charities has received.
The Ministry of Defence has met with a number of service charities to discuss the mechanisms put in place to support those Gurkha veterans and their dependants who decide to come to settle in the UK under the new immigration rules. These meetings included the Gurkha Welfare Trust, which is the only charity established specifically for the relief of poverty and distress among Gurkha ex-servicemen of the British Crown and their dependants in Nepal. The Ministry of Defence has provided an annual grant to the Gurkha Welfare Trust since it was established in 1969. This grant, which currently amounts to just over £1 million per year, contributes towards the administrative costs of the trust's field arm operating in Nepal, the Gurkha Welfare Scheme.
RAF Coningsby
The transfer of most fast jet test flying and some evaluation activities, including 11 military and three QinetiQ posts, from Boscombe Down to RAF Coningsby is expected to result in a range of time, cost and performance benefits across Defence, including the more efficient use of flying hours, and an enhanced ability to meet the requirements of the front-line user, through the integration of developmental and operational test and evaluation activity.
Work and Pensions
Departmental Translation Services
The DWP provides a range of language translation services for customers across Great Britain (as Northern Ireland is excluded), namely:
1. Face to face.
2. Telephone.
3. Translating by a range of services which includes the translation of departmental information leaflets and other documents that are provided to customers in a range of ethnic languages, audio and Braille, as well as all publications for Welsh-speaking customers living in Wales.
4. We are also able to offer an ad-hoc service to convert documents into Easy Read format. Spend for Easy Read has in the past been included within other category spend and so cannot be identified without incurring disproportionate cost.
The contractual arrangements for the services have been developed over a number of years and as a result spend has not been applicable for some of these services in each of the last five years or data have not been able to be gathered for spend during some years. Disproportionate cost would be incurred in trying to identify such spend.
We are unable to identify spend for specific geographic areas, such as the Ribble Valley and Lancashire, without incurring disproportionate cost.
The total spend information is given in the following table:
Type of translation service 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Face to face and telephone 2,967,756 3,443,334 4,496,008 3,515,722 3,761,765 Ethnic document translation n/a 120,720 267,500 134,945 1459,554 Welsh 30,855 20,766 50,759 65,789 66,755 Braille n/a n/a n/a 45,309 59,522 Audio n/a n/a n/a 35,572 33,397 Easy Read n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Total 2,998,611 3,584,820 4,814,267 3,797,337 4,380,993 n/a = not available without incurring disproportionate cost as data not held centrally or is combined within other category data and not possible to separate. 1 This figure includes all translation spend for the International Pensions Centre (IPC) which previously was not held centrally—total £381,370.59 for 2008-09.
Foreign Workers: EU Countries
Under UK health and safety legislation, employers must provide a safe and healthy working environment for all workers under their control, including those from EU member states. Any workers from EU member states working as self-employed will also be subject to these requirements. Workers must take reasonable care for their own and others' health and safety at work, and cooperate with their employer to enable compliance. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and local authorities are responsible for enforcing the requirements in the majority of UK workplaces, and use inspection, investigation, enforcement, advice and guidance to secure compliance.
Pensioners: Social Security Benefits
A wide range of services and benefits in kind are available to older people and these are administered both centrally and locally. As a result, the information is not available in the format requested: some information is not collected and some could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. The information which is available is given as follows.
(i) NHS services
People aged 60 and over are able to claim free prescriptions and eye tests on the grounds of age. Detailed information on prescription charges is not held in the format requested.
In financial year 2008-09, 90,380 free NHS sight tests were given to people aged 60 and over within the North Yorkshire and York PCT area, costing an estimated £1,789,524.
There is no automatic entitlement for adult pensioners to NHS optical vouchers or free dental treatment. Individuals may qualify for these benefits if they are in receipt of certain qualifying benefits, or if they have been assessed as eligible for assistance under the NHS Low Income Scheme. Information on the value of such NHS services provided to patients of pensionable age who qualify on the basis of their personal economic circumstances is not available centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
(ii) Social services
The gross current expenditure by York council on social services for people aged 65 or over for the financial year 2008-09 was £30.8 million1.
(iii) Travel concessions
The statutory minimum travel concession, introduced in April 2008, gives those aged 60 or over and eligible disabled people free off-peak local bus travel in any part of England. The Government provide around £1 billion a year to fund the concession.
Travel concession schemes are provided through local authorities, which have flexibility to enhance their schemes to offer more than the statutory minimum, so there are local variations in what is offered and take-up of concessionary travel also varies from one area to another. Therefore it is not possible to quantify the value of the benefit in kind in a specific local authority area.
(iv) Television licences
Free television licences for people aged 75 or over were introduced in November 2000. TV Licensing, who administer free licences as agents for the BBC, are not able to provide geographical breakdowns of licences issued. However, figures are available for the number of households with at least one person aged 75 or over receiving winter fuel payments in York local authority. These people would be eligible for a free television licence. 12,180 households received winter fuel payments in York local authority in the year 2008-09.
The television licence fee for the year 2009-10 is £142.50 for a colour television licence, and £48.00 for a black and white television licence.
(v) Insulation
The Warm Front Scheme is the Government's main programme for tackling fuel poverty in vulnerable households in the private sector in England. Warm Front provides grants for heating, insulation and energy efficiency measures. For the year 2009-10, 132 single pensioner households and 100 two-pensioner households received Warm Front assistance in the York local authority area, and the average spend on each of those households was £1,870.08 and £1,675.20 respectively.
1 Source:
RO3 and PSS EX1 returns.
Note:
Gross expenditure includes income from client contributions, but excludes capital charges and certain income items which count as expenditure elsewhere in the public sector, such as contributions from primary care trusts. This is to avoid double counting within the aggregate public sector accounts of the money involved.
Social Security Benefits: Fraud
Fraud can occur when a person is sent to prison and they do not notify the Department. If this is the case there can be a short delay before benefit payments are stopped.
The Department matches its data with that held by the Ministry of Justice to identify prisoners who may still be in receipt of benefit. This data match now takes place weekly instead of four-weekly and we are detecting prisoner fraud more quickly than ever before, thus reducing the size of any overpayments.
Over the last five years this type of fraud has only arisen in income support. Fraudulent overpayments to prisoners have remained consistently low accounting for no more than an estimated 0.1 per cent of income support benefit expenditure.
The available information is in the table.
Amount of income support overpaid1 (£ million) 2004-052 6 2005-06 4 2006-07 7 2007-08 4 2008-09 6 1 Estimates of customer fraud committed by prisoners are collated and published only for income support, jobseeker's allowance and pension credit. The levels for jobseeker's allowance and pension credit were £0 million in each of the last five years. 2 Improvements to the methodology were introduced in 2005-06 which created a discontinuity between the estimates up to 2004-05 and from 2005-06 onwards. Therefore comparisons over time should be made with caution. Source: Published National Statistics Reports—Fraud and Error in the Benefit System.
Women and Equality
Departmental Lost Property
Over the past 12 months the Government Equalities Office has recorded two items as missing. The first item was a laptop with an estimated value of £2,000. The laptop cannot be used without a security key, which was not lost. The second item was a set of blank travel tickets with a nominal value of £4,000, which in practice could not have been used by others.
The Government Equalities Office has not recorded any items as stolen.
Departmental Surveys
The Government Equalities Office (GEO) will be publishing its staff survey results as soon as practicable. Given the Department’s small size, we need to give full and careful consideration to ensure in publishing results that individuals cannot be identified. Once the results are published on the GEO website, we will ensure a copy is placed in the Library.
Equality Bill
My officials, colleagues and I have received a number of representations on a range of issues from both individuals and religion and belief organisations since the introduction of the Equality Bill in April last year.
The main issues raised were:
whether the Bill curbed religious freedom of expression;
restriction of freedom of conscience;
a perceived hierarchy of rights where some protected characteristics take precedence over the rights of the religious;
Catholic adoption agencies;
the occupational requirement employment exception for organised religion; and
faith-based care homes.
Such discussions and representations are ongoing as it is always important for Government to maintain a dialogue.
International Women's Day
The Government are marking International Women’s Day in a number of ways:
a breakfast meeting at No. 10 with women executives on 8 March;
a Commonwealth Parliamentary Seminar Reception (10 March); and
a Parliamentary topical debate marking International Women’s day in the House of Commons on11 March; and
a reception for International Women’s Day at No. 10 hosted by Sarah Brown on 18 March.
In addition, individual Departments undertook the following to coincide with International Women’s Day:
The Government Equalities Office published:
‘What the Government has done for women’ factsheet;
‘Women’s Representation’ factsheet:
Research report and findings on public attitudes to the representation of women in business and Government;
Government's Response to the Speaker’s Conference; and
Report on the regional ‘Women in Focus’ events which promoted best practice in diverting women from crime (with Ministry of Justice).
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office:
Welcomed the appointment of Minister of State, Baroness Kinnock, as Women’s Officer. Baroness Kinnock will be responsible for leading the Government’s work to tackle violence against women overseas. These are in addition to her responsibilities as Minister of State.
Published a newly developed poster and leaflet designed to raise awareness of FGM. A new e-mail address has also been set up (fgm@fco.gov.uk) for those who have concerns or questions about FGM to use.
The Department for Schools, Children and Families:
Published the report of the Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) Advisory Group and the Government’s response, including plans to revise training for new teachers and to include VAWG issues in the PHSE curriculum for 2011.
The Home Office:
Announced that a series of laws to protect vulnerable women by reducing the demand for prostitution, including the police no longer having to show kerb-crawlers are “persistent” before arresting them, will come into effect on 1 April.
Held an internal ministerial event on delivering the Gender Equality duty with stakeholders.
The Department for International Development (DFID):
Welcomed Andrea Cornwall, Director of the Pathways of Women’s Empowerment Research Programme, to DFID to share key research findings. Pathways is an international research and communications programme that links academics, activists and practitioners across the globe to explore ways to enhance women’s empowerment.
Screened video clips giving ground level insights and testimonials from women in Ghana and posted these on the DFID website.
Ellen Wratten, Director of Policy and Head of Profession for Social Development at DFID, will be giving a presentation at Plan International’s celebration in Westminster Hall on 8 March on the new joint DFID/NIKE Foundation ‘Girl Hub’ programme that focuses on empowering adolescent girls in developing countries.
Prime Minister
Charlie Whelan
I have meetings with a wide range of organisations and individuals on a range of subjects.
Intelligence and Security Committee
I have met and corresponded with the ISC and its Chairman on several occasions over the past year to discuss a range of matters of mutual interest, and will continue to do so.
House of Commons Commission
Nurseries
(2) when the application for listed building consent in connection with the proposed creation of a day nursery at 1 Parliament street was submitted; and if he will place in the Library a copy of the application.
I refer the hon. Gentleman to the reply I gave on 23 March 2010, Official Report, column 170W.
The commercial competition for a nursery operator is currently in progress which will provide information relevant to the operating costs for the nursery. In order to avoid undermining the House’s position in the commercial competition, it is not possible to disclose any further information at this stage. According to childcare experts, there is likely to be a build up of usage over a period: the average use of the first 12 months of a new nursery is likely to be around 40 per cent. The intention in the longer term is to recover the full operating costs through the charges made to users.
The deadline for the receipt of tenders from nursery operators was Friday 19 March 2010. A copy of the specification for the contract will be placed in the Library.
Olympics
Olympic Games 2012: Construction
The Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) is committed to transporting 50 per cent. of materials to the Park, by weight, using sustainable methods, i.e. rail or water. The ODA is currently exceeding this target with almost 64 per cent. of material transported to the Park by sustainable methods.
The ODA will continue to actively encourage its supply chain to utilise rail and water facilities. While it is not within the ODA's remit to stipulate how many deliveries should be made to the Olympic Park by its supply chain, it is expected that there will be at least three barge movements per week as fit out work on the venues increases.
The Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) constructed a temporary wharf on Waterworks river for the construction phase of the programme to provide contractors with the opportunity to move material into and out of the Park by water. It is currently intended that this temporary wharf will be decommissioned in the spring of 2011. However, the ODA is currently exploring potential usages for sections of the Wharf during the games and this work is ongoing.
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Colombia: Human Rights
The mass graves in La Macarena were first brought to the attention of our embassy in Bogota in November 2009.
Our ambassador asked the Colombian Government, namely Carlos Franco, Director of the Presidential Human Rights Programme in Colombia, for information on the alleged mass graves. We received a reply on 16 February 2010, which I shared with Carolina Hoyos, a human rights activist whom I met on 16 March. According to Mr. Franco there are 650 corpses properly identified in their graves buried during the last 20 years. There are approximately 350 corpses not identified during the same 20 years. The burial of non-identified people at La Macarena's cemetery has been properly registered in the control books kept by the municipal authorities and the officers in charge of the cemetery's administration. We will continue to monitor developments in the investigation into these mass graves.
I was dismayed to learn of the killing of Mr. Hurtado in the La Macarena region, who was President of the Human Rights committee of La Catalina. Our ambassador in Bogota raised Mr. Hurtado's assassination with the Director of the Presidential Human Rights Programme and the Head of the International Relations Unit at the Colombian Prosecutor's Office.
Conflict Resolution
For the current financial year (2009-10) the UK has provided over £100,000 of financial support to promote coexistence projects in Israel. The Government will look to fund several projects which will promote human rights in Israel in the next financial year. We cannot, as yet, confirm how much will be allocated to coexistence projects next financial year.
Middle East: Peace Negotiations
The UK has provided financial support to educational projects which promote co-existence between Jewish and Arab children in Israel.
The Government have spent over £100,000 in the current financial year to support projects and organisations that develop co-existence between Jewish and Arab citizens of Israel.
The UK regularly raises concerns regarding equality issues. I discussed the issue of Israeli minorities in a meeting with the Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister on 9 February. We also highlighted the issue in the 2009 Foreign and Commonwealth Office Annual Report on Human Rights, which was published on 17 March.
Poland: Anti-Semitism
We condemn the act of vandalism against the monuments at the former Plaszow concentration camp and all instances of persecution and discrimination against individuals and groups wherever they occur.
Polish politicians have spoken out strongly against this act. Polish Foreign Minister Sikorkski said:
“The people who did this deserve the highest condemnation. This is something which ruins Poland and which I personally am ashamed of.”
Polish Cardinal Dziwish has apologised to Jewish people on behalf of all Christians for what happened.
Our embassy in Warsaw was in touch with non-governmental organisations and relevant Government representatives that deal with and monitor anti-Semitism on 16 April 2009. The Polish Government highlighted some of their initiatives in their interim report, responding to a 2007 memorandum, to the Council of Europe Commissioner for human rights. This can be found on the Commissioner's website:
http://www.coe.int/t/commissioner/News/2009/090420Poland Report_en.asp
Culture, Media and Sport
Departmental Buildings
The Department does provide subsidised gym facilities for its staff.
Departmental Consultants
Bellenden Public Affairs provided support to the All-Party Horticultural Working Group with funding from the Royal Parks Agency.
Departmental Internet
The Department and its agencies have not incurred any expenditure on Google Adwords in the last 12 months.
My Department's policy on internet usage is as follows:
Do not access the internet during working hours for purposes other than those for which you are employed. Any personal use should be limited, carried out in non-working hours and should not interfere with the performance of your duties nor with the Department's IT/networking systems and services.
Access to tobacco-related websites is blocked because they have no relevance to the work of the Department.
Ofcom: Standards
I have been asked to reply.
The Office of Communications (Ofcom) is the regulator and competition authority for the UK communications industries. Ministers do not monitor Ofcom's performance because the regulator is independent of Government and is accountable directly to Parliament. Ofcom is required to report annually to Parliament through the annual plan and report and accounts.
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Commercial Waste
A change in the definition of municipal waste will not alter local authority responsibilities on commercial waste. The vast majority of commercial waste is managed by the private sector and we do not expect this to change. However, we do want to promote more sorting and recycling of commercial waste and have a number of measures in place including funding for pilot trade waste recycling points and collection schemes.
Bovine Tuberculosis
The Veterinary Medicines Directorate yesterday issued an authorisation for a tuberculosis vaccine for use in badgers. This has been made possible by the hard work of the researchers at the Veterinary Laboratories Agency and the Food and Environment Research Agency and reflects 10 years and £11 million of DEFRA-funded research and development. This injectable vaccine will be used in the Badger Vaccine Deployment Project to commence in six areas in England from July.
Recommendations from the October 2009 progress report of the TB Eradication Group for England have been implemented, including enhanced TB surveillance and control and additional support to farmers under TB restrictions.
Common Fisheries Policy
The UK’s response to the Commission’s Green Paper on reform of the Common Fisheries Policy sets out our objectives to achieve prosperous, sustainable exploitation of fish stocks. This response makes clear that there must be more regionalised decision-making; genuine integration of fisheries with other marine policies; longer-term management planning; greater flexibility and certainty in the system; and a mechanism to ease the transition to a sustainable and profitable future.
Lost Life Report
Our plans are already set out in “Conserving Biodiversity—the UK Approach”. We have set targets to 2020 to increase the range and populations of priority species and the extent and quality of priority habitats.
Drains
Following DEFRA’s consultation on non-agricultural diffuse pollution in 2007, we made a decision to progress each policy option separately. For example, we have recently consulted on options for legislative mechanisms to control phosphates in domestic laundry cleaning products in the UK. We have also proposed a requirement for developers to consider sustainable drainage systems for surface water for all new developments in the Flood and Water Management Bill.
As part of this, the use of a legislative approach based on general binding rules (GBRs) is another of the options which we are developing. While we are not in a position to hold a consultation in the near future, as policy develops and further evidence of the impact of GBRs is gathered, we may hold a consultation. To commit to any policy on further development of GBRs we must be confident that any action would be of benefit to the environment, and that the economic and social impacts of the action are assessed.
More information about policy work is available on our website at:
www.defra.gov.uk/environment/quality/water/waterquality/diffuse/non-agri/index.htm
Food Supply: Government Assistance
Government are taking a number of steps to support the UK food industry which is our biggest manufacturing sector, including the Food 2030 Strategy, more investment in research and development, consulting on a supermarket ombudsman, the agri-skills plan and the work of the task forces to assist the pig sector and to encourage more production and consumption of fruit and vegetables.
Gangmasters
I am content that the Gangmasters Licensing Act 2004 provides an effective regulatory framework, allowing the Gangmasters Licensing Authority to take a robust approach in enforcing its provisions.
We have recently laid revised regulations which clarify when a licence is required and correct an anomaly in the application of the Gangmasters Licensing (Exclusions) Regulations 2006 which was identified following recent representations made by my hon. Friend.
Marine Conservation Zones
(2) what assessment he has made of the likely effectiveness of the establishment of marine conservation zones in protecting the full range of biodiversity in UK waters.
The UK has and is making progress in reducing its environmental footprint in the marine area.
Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are an integral part of our comprehensive marine policy. We are committed to designating enough MPAs by end 2012 to ensure we have contributed to a UK ecologically coherent network of sites.
We consider that the concept of Good Environmental Status should guide the minimum level acceptable for Marine Conservation Zone (MCZ) objectives, as far as that is an appropriate measure for a site-based conservation tool. This will be defined through implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive.
Members: Correspondence
I replied to both of the hon. Member's letters on 23 March and I apologise for the intervening delay.
Recycling
DEFRA Ministers and officials meet representatives of the recycling industries on a regular basis to discuss a wide range of waste issues.
(2) how much waste was recycled in each (a) district council, (b) borough council, (c) unitary authority and (d) other local authority area in the East of England in the latest period for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement;
(3) how much waste was recycled in each (a) district council, (b) borough council, (c) unitary authority and (d) other local authority area in Greater London in the latest period for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement;
(4) how much waste was recycled in each (a) district council, (b) borough council, (c) unitary authority and (d) other local authority area in the South East in the latest period for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement;
(5) how much waste was recycled in each (a) district council, (b) borough council, (c) unitary authority and (d) other local authority area in the South West in the latest period for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement;
(6) how much waste was recycled in each (a) district council, (b) borough council, (c) unitary authority and (d) other local authority area in the East Midlands in the latest period for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement;
(7) how much waste was recycled in each (a) district council, (b) borough council, (c) unitary authority and (d) other local authority area in Yorkshire and the Humber in the latest period for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement;
(8) how much waste was recycled in each (a) district council, (b) borough council, (c) unitary authority and (d) other local authority area in the North West in the latest period for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement;
(9) how much waste was recycled in each (a) district council, (b) borough council, (c) unitary authority and (d) other local authority area in the North East in the latest period for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement;
A table showing tonnages of waste sent for recycling, composting or reuse for all local authorities in England in the first quarter of financial year 2009-10 has been placed in the Library. The most recent full financial year data, which would take account of any seasonal changes, are available in Table 1 of the 2008-09 results for all authorities published on the DEFRA website:
www.defra.gov.uk/evidence/statistics/environment/wastats/bulletin09.htm
River Thames: Angling
To ensure compliance with the European Eel Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007, the Eels (England and Wales) Regulations 2009 (No. 3344) establishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European eel came into force on the 15 January 2010.
As part of the Eels Regulations, close seasons have been introduced to curtail fishing effort at times of particular pressure on the stock: 26 May 2010 to 14 February 2011 for eels 12 centimetres or less, and 1 October 2010 to 31 March 2011 for all other eels.
The 2010 close seasons were set nationally and coincide with peak runs for elvers and with the main silver eel net fishing season. The close seasons will be in force for one year to provide time to assess stocks in each river basin.
In 2011, both adult eel and elver close seasons will be set through Environment Agency (EA) byelaws and will be specific to individual river basins to match local circumstances. The EA met with representatives of Thames eel fishermen in January this year to discuss the revision of byelaws.
A copy of the Statutory Instrument together with the Explanatory Memorandum, which provides information to support the measures introduced through the Eels (England and Wales) Regulations 2009, has been placed in the Library.
Waste and Resources Action Programme
I have arranged for copies of all the tender invitation documents that were published in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU) by the Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP) over the last three years to be placed in the Library of the House. Copies of all other tender invitation documents produced by WRAP over this period, including those with a value below the threshold for publication in the OJEU, could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Water
DEFRA recognises the role water efficiency can play in reducing energy use, especially through reduced hot water consumption. Last September the Department launched a water efficiency campaign under the Act on CO2 banner which highlighted the energy and carbon implications of water use. DEFRA officials are in ongoing discussions with Department of Energy and Climate Change counterparts to coordinate the delivery of programmes to improve energy and water efficiency.
Each water company in England and Wales has had a duty to promote the efficient use of water by its customers. Ofwat is responsible for enforcing this duty and reports on progress in its annual Service and Delivery reports, available from its website. Following discussions within the Government-led Water Saving Group, Ofwat has introduced water efficiency targets for water companies from 2010-11 to 2014-15.
Energy and Climate Change
Boilers: Government Assistance
[holding answer 18 March 2010]: At the last set of published figures as at 16 March 2010, 118,785 vouchers had been allocated. 35,390 boilers or renewable heating systems had been installed, based on the number of claims to date from householders.
Carbon Emissions: Housing
Domestic heating products make up 6 per cent. of savings to date towards the 185 million tonne lifetime carbon dioxide savings target (April 2008-March 2011 time frame). This compares to some 62 per cent. of savings to date achieved through insulation products. There are seven heating product types eligible under CERT, but suppliers are not required to report the number of each installed until the end of the scheme. However, suppliers do report on a quarterly basis to Ofgem the number of microgeneration units installed (approximately 1,000 to December 2009) and the number of properties switched from coal or oil to gas central heating (approximately 100,000).
An independent assessment is commissioned at the end of each three year phase of the Supplier Obligation (now termed the Carbon Emissions Reduction Target), building on the cost-benefit assessment undertaken and published at the launch of each scheme. Independent analysis of the three year supplier obligation scheme ending March 2008 showed it to have been extremely cost effective in delivery—that for every £1 added on to GB household bills to pay for the obligation, benefits equate to an average saving of £9 per household bill over the lifetime of the measures. Equally, the present supplier obligation, the Carbon Emissions Reduction Target which ends in March 2011, is also believed to be highly cost-effective. Annual benefits (net of costs) are expected to be around £649 million for the lifetime of the measures, with around £228 benefits per tonne of carbon dioxide saved in the traded sector and £153 benefits per tonne of CO2 saved in the non-traded sector. Insulation measures make up over 60 per cent. of savings to target—equivalent to some 4 million households receiving insulation measures.
Departmental Temporary Employment
Since its inception on 3 October 2008 my Department spent a total of £374,939 on temporary staff in the financial year 2008-09. The latest available figures for financial year 2009-10 show an expenditure of £1,603,259 on temporary staff.
The information on the numbers of temporary staff and companies from which the staff was sourced can be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Departmental Theft
The Department has building access monitoring and control measures in place in accordance with Cabinet Office policy; requires all staff to wear passes while in the office; issues staff awareness guidance on its intranet; has a clear desk policy in place and provides secure storage for its staff.
Ongoing security awareness activities are undertaken to ensure that DECC assets and information are handled appropriately and securely.
Electronic Warfare
The Government's Cyber Security Strategy of the United Kingdom, published alongside and reflected in the National Security Strategy update of June 2009, considers a number of methods of cyber attack, including those that generate high levels of power that can damage or disrupt unprotected electronics. It also outlines the new governance structures and workstreams which are now building on existing work to take forward the Government's plan for reducing the impact on and vulnerability of the UK's interests from cyber attacks.
The Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure (CPNI) provides advice on electronic or cyber protective security measures to the businesses and organisations that comprise the UK's critical national infrastructure, including public utilities, companies and banks. CPNI also runs a CERT (Computer Emergency Response Team) service which responds to reported attacks on private sector networks. In addition, CESG provides Government Departments with advice and guidance on how to protect against, detect and mitigate various types of cyber attack.
It would not be in the interests of national security to provide information about specific vulnerabilities, assessments or protective measures relating to electromagnetic pulse attack.
Energy: Housing
The total cost of the Penistone Area Based Initiative campaign was £8,783.96.
Energy: Prices
The Government believe they have done all that is required to implement the Internal Market in Electricity and Gas directives. The Commission was notified of the implementation of the directive (except for provisions relating to the requirement for electricity companies to disclose their fuel mix to final customers and the requirement for Ofgem to act as dispute settlement authority between energy undertakings) in October 2004. No assessment has been made of the effects on energy prices of the timing of the implementation of each directive.
Information Commissioner
No data loss incidents have been reported to the Information Commissioner by DECC since its inception.
Redpoint: Expenditure
The Department has paid a total of £533,486 to Redpoint since 3 October 2008. The total paid for the RO Reform report was £155,710 and £142,427 for the Carbon Capture and Storage report. The costs include VAT.
Water
The Government's UK Low Carbon Transition Plan published in July 2009 covered energy use and CO2 emissions from the domestic sector. It highlights that the energy used in our homes for heating water (excluding that for heating our homes) is 25 per cent. of the overall domestic energy use.
The Environment Agency have carried out extensive research on the CO2 emissions from domestic hot water use. Their latest research suggests that annual emissions from heating water in a typical home are approximately 900kgCO2. This at the UK level these represent ~23MtCO2/yr of the 140.7MtCO2/yr attributable to energy end use in homes (including emissions from electricity use in homes).
Further information can be found in the Environment Agency report here:
http://www.grdp.org/business/topics/water/109835.aspx
The Government's Household Energy Management Strategy ‘Green Homes, Warmer Homes’, published on 2 March:
http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/what_we_do/consumers/saving_energy/hem/hem.aspx
focuses on cutting carbon emissions from the household sector through energy efficiency and other measures. In developing the strategy, my Department met representatives of a variety of organisations, including Waterwise who campaign on water efficiency.
Wind Power: Compensation
The general principles of arrangements for compensation for fishermen adversely affected by wind farm development have been discussed at length in the Fishing Liaison with Offshore Wind and Wet Renewables Group on which my Department, wind developers and the fishing industry are represented. The group, which includes a representative from the inshore fishing sector, has produced best practice guidance that can be found at
http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/what_we_do/uk_supply/energy_mix/renewable/policy/offshore/groups/groups.aspx
This guidance includes an appendix dealing with issues concerning assessing the value of fishing activities and related compensation, disruption or displacement payments.
Transport
A13: Litter
The contractual obligations that apply to Connect Plus for the cleaning and collecting of rubbish and litter from the A13/A1089 highway and its embankments require the contractor to perform routine services in respect of sweeping and cleaning.
The general requirement is to comply with the standards of cleanliness set out in the Environmental Protection Act 1990: Code of Practice on Litter and Refuse, for the sweeping and cleaning of all channels and hard shoulders, verges, central reservations, lay-bys, slopes, removal of litter and sweeping of footways and cycle tracks.
Performance against these sweeping and cleaning obligations is measured and reported to the Highways Agency for review on a monthly basis.
Departmental Buildings
The information requested can be provided only at disproportionate cost.
East Coast Railway Line
The planned start date of the new franchise is November 2011.
East Coast is a revenue generative business which returns a surplus to the public purse. Payments are made on a rail period rather than monthly basis. The following table shows the payments that East Coast is contracted to make in its first five periods of operation which show that the business will return some £47 million to the public purse during this time.
Rail period Amount (£) Period 9 (part period) 13 November 2009 to 12 December 2009 112,636,157 Period 10 13 December 2009 to 9 January 2010 2(4,630,742) Period 11 10 January 2010 to 6 February 2010 114,183,011 Period 12 7 February 2010 to 6 March 2010 113,786,696 Period 13 7 March 2010 to 31 March 2010 111,112,614 Total 147,087,736 1 Payment to DFT. 2 Payment to East Coast.
It is not possible to estimate the likely cost to the public purse of the failure of National Express's East Coast franchise at present. The final cost is dependent on the resolution of outstanding issues with National Express, the level of ticket revenue generated by East Coast and the value achieved for the franchise when it is re-let.
No jobs were lost either directly or indirectly as a result of the failure of National Express's East Coast Mainline franchise.
Some changes were made to the executive team with a new Managing Director appointed before the handover and three new Directors since.
The failure of National Express East Coast will not result in a cost to the economy. The Government ensured the continuity of rail services through the use of its statutory powers.
First Capital Connect
[holding answer 4 February 2010]: I refer the hon. Member to my answer of 27 January 2010, Official Report, column 877W.
Ministers have not had any meetings with the Office of Rail Regulation about First Capital Connect during that period. However, Ministers have regular meeting to discuss the performance of all train operating companies, including First Capital Connect.
The Secretary of State had a further meeting with the Chief Executive of First Group and the Managing Director of First Capital Connect on 2 February.
Infrastructure: National Policy Statements
An announcement on the publication of the National Networks National Policy Statement will be made in due course.
Languages
No Ministers have received coaching in a foreign language in the last 12 months.
The following table provides a break down of Civil Servants within the Department for Transport and its agencies who have received coaching in a Foreign Language:
Foreign Language(s) Number of civil servants receiving foreign language coaching Expenditure incurred Chinese, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, BSL and Welsh 13 1,304
Network Rail: Finance
(2) what budget was allocated to Network Rail in respect of (a) station maintenance, (b) track maintenance, (c) vegetation and tree management, (d) signal maintenance, (e) points, switches and crossings maintenance, (f) drainage maintenance, (g) fencing maintenance, (h) bridge and other structure maintenance, (i) buildings maintenance, (j) litter collection and policing, (k) graffiti removal and policing and (l) CCTV in each year since its inception;
(3) what the projected budget allocation is for Network Rail in each of the next 10 years;
(4) what Network Rail’s budget allocation was in each year since its inception.
Information about the funding available to Network Rail in the coming years is published by the independent Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) in its document, “Periodic review 2008, Determination of Network Rail’s outputs and funding for 2009-14”. The document is available on ORR’s website at:
http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/upload/pdf/383.pdf
Details of Network Rail’s historic budget allocations are published in the company’s annual Regulatory Financial Statements, which are available on its website at:
http://www.networkrail.co.uk/browseDirectory.aspx?dir=\ Regulatory%20Documents\Regulatory%20Compliance %20and%20Reporting\Regulatory%20 Accounts&pageid=2893&root
Parking: Housing
The introduction of yellow line parking restrictions or controlled parking zones are matters for individual local authorities, following appropriate consultation. No central record is kept of these local decisions, and the Government have made no estimate of the proportion of households affected.
Railway Stations: Greater London
There are currently 38 stations in London boroughs in the Access for All Programme. Of these, 10 are complete or will be complete by the end of this financial year. Work is under way on a further three. According to Network Rail’s latest delivery plan, there are seven stations where work is due to start on site in 2010-11, 11 in 2011-12, six in 2012-13, and one from 2013 onwards. A document listing the stations which are at each stage has been placed in the Libraries of the House.
Railways: Construction
The proposed Exceptional Hardship Scheme sets out proposals to help certain home-owners who may be affected by blight following publication of the Government’s response to HS2 Ltd’.s recommendations. The scheme is not a “project” for the purposes of Council Directive 1985/337/EEC on the assessment of effects of certain public and private projects on the environment. Accordingly, no environmental impact assessment is required.
If a decision is taken to proceed with high speed rail, the appropriate environmental assessment would form part of any preparations for the introduction of a Hybrid Bill.
Buckinghamshire county council is regarded as a consultee. The leader and chief executive were sent copies of all the relevant materials following the Statement on high speed rail by the Secretary for State for Transport. Any individual or organisation can request copies of and respond to the Exceptional Hardship Scheme consultation. Copies are available from DFT Publications at
www.dft.gov.uk/foi/dftps/howtoobtaindftpublications/form
or telephone 0300 123 1102.
The consultation closes on 20 May 2010. The Government recognise the importance to affected property owners of introducing the scheme, should they decide to do so, as quickly as is practicable. We would expect this to be in June.
“High Speed Rail” was published on 11 March 2010. Prior to this Ministers and officials in the Department held no meetings with interested parties outside the Government at which HS2 Ltd. proposed routes from London to the West Midlands were discussed. Following the publication of the Command Paper, the Secretary of State for Transport, has held meetings with various hon. Members, and other stakeholders, to discuss high speed rail in general and/or in relation to constituency or local interests.
The Department consulted the HM Government “Code of Practice on Consultation”, which recommends that consultations should not generally be launched during election periods. The consultation on the Exceptional Hardship Scheme was launched on 11 March, while Parliament was sitting. The Government recognise the importance to affected property owners of introducing the scheme, should they decide to do so, as quickly as is practicable. The timing of the launch was determined accordingly. In addition, the duration of the consultation was shortened—to 10 weeks instead of the recommended 12—for the same reason.
Railways: Fares
The estimate of the annual percentage change to the cost of travelling by rail in each year since 2000 is shown in the following table, next to the percentage change in disposable income for comparison.
Rail fares (£) Percentage change Disposable income (£) Percentage change 2000 102.97 1.03 109.36 4.11 2001 105.45 2.41 114.29 4.51 2002 106.88 1.36 116.57 1.99 2003 108.24 1.27 120.05 2.98 2004 110.49 2.08 121.01 0.79 2005 114.55 3.67 124.37 2.77 2006 112.58 -1.72 126.17 1.45 2007 114.1 1.35 126.29 0.09 2008 116.54 2.14 n/a n/a
Richard Bowker
As Minister of State the current Secretary of State for Transport, my noble Friend (Lord Adonis), met or spoke with Richard Bowker, the then chief executive of the National Express Group, on 23 October 2008, 28 November 2008, 18 February 2009 and 21 April 2009. Since becoming Secretary of State he had one meeting with Mr. Bowker on 9 June 2009.
The previous Secretary of State for Transport met with Mr. Bowker on 20 January and 25 February 2009.
Some of these meetings were specifically to discuss issues relating to National Express Group plc or its subsidiaries; others were wider events involving other transport stakeholders.
Road Works
The Department for Transport consulted on draft amendments to the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002 between September and December 2009. These include proposals to permit portable pedestrian facilities. Officials at the Department are considering the responses received and will be revising the draft regulations to address the issues raised.
Roads: Tolls
The Government have already ruled out national road pricing in this or the next Parliament. However the Government are contractually committed to funding up to December 2010 the ‘Demonstrations’ projects that look at the technological, operational and organisational challenges around widespread Time/Distance/Place road pricing. The Government have no plans to undertake further ‘Demonstrations’ projects.
Social Security Benefits
The information requested can be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Stephen Byers
My noble Friend the Secretary of State for Transport (Lord Adonis) had a brief conversation in the House of Commons with the right hon. Member for North Tyneside (Mr. Byers) in June 2009 about the East Coast Main Line. The Secretary of State does not recall the precise date (although it cannot have been before 8 June, his first full week in office).
The Department for Transport has not received any emails or letters from the right hon. Member for North Tyneside (Mr. Byers) about National Express.
The Department for Transport has not received any correspondence from the right hon. Member for North Tyneside (Mr. Byers) on the operation by National Express of the East Coast Rail subsidiary franchise.
My noble Friend the Secretary of State for Transport (Lord Adonis) had a brief conversation in the House of Commons with the right hon. Member for North Tyneside (Mr. Byers) in June 2009 about the East Coast Main Line.
As this was a conversation in the House of Commons there is no official note. However, the Secretary of State has stated for the record that they discussed the right hon. Member's experience in dealing with rail franchise difficulties when Transport Secretary. As regards the situation then facing National Express the Secretary of State told him that despite the company's difficulties he had no intention whatsoever of renegotiating the East Coast franchise on terms favourable to the company, as the company was seeking in its approaches to the Department for Transport. The Secretary of State also told the right hon. Member that in his view such a move would undermine the rail franchise system and would not be in the best interests of tax payers.
At the instigation of the right hon. Member for North Tyneside (Mr. Byers), my noble Friend the Secretary of State for Transport (Lord Adonis) had a brief conversation with him about the East Coast Main Line in the House of Commons in June 2009. The Secretary of State does not recall the precise date (although this cannot have been before 8 June, his first full week in office), and as this was a conversation in the House of Commons there is no official note.
However, the Secretary of State has stated for the record that they discussed the right hon. Member's experience in dealing with rail franchise difficulties when Transport Secretary. As regards the situation then facing National Express, the Secretary of State told him that despite the company's difficulties he had no intention whatsoever of renegotiating the East Coast franchise on terms favourable to the company, as the company was seeking in its approaches to the Department for Transport. The Secretary of State also told the right hon. Member that in his view such a move would undermine the rail franchise system and would not be in the best interests of tax payers.
The Permanent Secretary of the Department for Transport was informed of the conversation shortly after it took place.
Transport Innovation Fund
I refer the hon. Member to my written statement on the Urban Challenge Fund on 2 March 2010, Official Report, columns 107-08WS.
Justice
Arrest Warrants: War Crimes
(2) if he will list all the interested individuals and organisations to which a copy of the paper was sent.
The paper ‘Arrest Warrants - Universal Jurisdiction’ was placed on the Ministry of Justice website on 17 March. It has been sent to the District Bench (Magistrates’ Courts) Legal Committee and to the Jewish Leadership Council, as well as to the persons and bodies listed in my answer of 18 March 2010.
Dangerous Dogs Act 1991: Convictions
The number of defendants proceeded against at magistrates courts, found guilty and sentenced at all courts for offences under Section 1 and 3 of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, in London Government Office Region and England in 2008 (latest available) can be viewed in the table.
Charging data are not held by the Ministry of Justice, thus prosecutions data have been provided in lieu.
Information on destruction and disqualification orders is not held centrally and can be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
Court data for 2009 are planned for publication in the autumn, 2010.
Fine bands3 Area/Section of the Act Proceeded against Found guilty Sentenced Fine £0-£200 £201-£500 £501-£1,000 £1,001-£2,000 £2,001-£5,000 Sentenced to immediate custody London G.O.R Section 14 62 51 51 27 20 7 — — — 2 Section 35 150 97 97 24 19 4 1 — — 7 England Section 14 137 115 115 54 44 10 — — — 6 Section 35 1,024 713 709 223 167 44 12 — — 20 1 The figures given in the table on court proceedings relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences it is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe. 2 Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. 3 The levels associated with fines do not relate to the amount of the fine but to the offence committed and the statutory maximum that may be issued for that offence. Therefore as the maximum fine for each of these offences is a level 5 every fine issued for these offences would be considered as a level 5 fine; as it would cover the range £0-£5000. We have therefore shown the number of fines issued by band. 4 Section 1 includes the following offences: Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec 1(2)(a). Breeding or breeding from a fighting dog. Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec 1(2)(b). Selling, exchanging, offering, advertising or exposing for sale a fighting dog. Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec 1(2)(c). Giving or offering to give a fighting dog. Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec 1(2)(d). Allowing a fighting dog to be in a public place without a muzzle or a lead. Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec 1(2)(e). Abandoning, or allowing to stray, a fighting dog. Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec 1(3). Possession, without exemption, of a Pit Bull Terrier, Japanese Tosa or other designated fighting dog. 5 Section 3 includes the following offences: Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec 3(1). Owner or person in charge allowing dog to be dangerously out of control in a public place injuring any person Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec 3(3). Owner or person in charge allowing dog to enter a non-public place and injure any person. Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec 3(1). Owner or person in charge allowing dog to be dangerously out of control in a public place, no injury being caused. Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec 3(3). Owner or person in charge allowing dog to enter a non-public place causing reasonable apprehension of injury to a person. Notes: Magistrates courts In the case of sentences at magistrates courts, a change was made to the categorisation by area as part of the rollout of the Libra case management system in magistrates courts during 2008. Sentences given at courts using the Libra system are categorised according to the criminal justice area of the court, while sentences given at courts not yet using the Libra system are categorised in the same way as at the Crown court. By the end of 2008, all magistrates courts were using Libra. This change will have almost no impact on the categorisation by area; only around 0.01 percent of sentences at magistrates courts could have been affected in 2007 and 2008. Police forces do not prosecute minor offences (those that are sentenced at magistrates courts) in courts outside their areas. Crown court Sentences at the Crown court are categorised according to the police force that prosecuted the offence including those sentences that may be given at a court outside the prosecuting police force’s area. Source: Justice Statistics Analytical Services in the Ministry of Justice
Debt Collection: Regulation
The consultation paper “Debt Management Schemes—delivering effective and balanced solutions for debtors and creditors”, published on 18 September 2009, looked at the current operation of the debt management market. It sought views on whether any changes were needed in this area and, if so, what those changes should be.
The consultation paper set out three broad options. First, to continue with the measures currently under way to raise awareness about current schemes and enforce existing rules with operators. Second, to improve current schemes without regulation, possibly through the introduction of a protocol. Or third, to implement the Lord Chancellor's powers to approve debt management schemes contained in Chapter 4 of Part 5 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007.
An initial impact assessment was published alongside the consultation paper which considered the potential effectiveness of all of the options contained in the consultation paper.
The responses to the consultation are currently being considered in detail to inform the Government's decision on what action is appropriate and necessary. This decision will be announced in the Government's response to the consultation which will be published as soon as possible.
Departmental Internet
Google AdWords help connect an organisation with potential customers by placing relevant advertisements on the right-hand-side of Google search results pages.
The nature of the public services delivered by the Ministry of Justice—principally administering the courts, prisons, probation and tribunals systems—do not generally involve advertising, via any medium, to reach their target audience.
We are aware of only one instance where Google AdWords has been used to communicate the Department's services in the last 12 months. This involved expenditure of £759.42 on ‘The Community Payback Campaign’.
All expenditure by the Ministry of Justice is undertaken in accordance with the principles of regularity, propriety and value for money contained in HM Treasury's ‘Managing Public Money’ and in pursuit of departmental aims and objectives.
Departmental Written Questions
In all answers to questions formulated as identified, data were provided at a geographical level most closely relevant to the constituency of the MP asking the question, taking into account the cost limit for extraction of data.
Ex-servicemen: Probation
(2) how many armed forces veterans were serving custodial sentences in (a) Manchester, (b) Durham and (c) Everthorpe prison on the latest date for which figures are available.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave the hon. Member for Meirionnydd Nant Conwy (Mr. Llwyd) on 2 March 2010, Official Report, column 1068W.
Juries
The information requested from 1990-2000 for how many people were required for jury service, summoned for jury service, were disqualified and those who refused to undertake jury service are not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost. This is because the summoning process was undertaken and the records were held manually at each Crown court in England and Wales.
Lionel Crabb
Portions of records within PREM 11/2077 will have been retained by the Prime Minister's Office and portions of records within ADM 1/29241 will have been retained by the Ministry of Defence, all under section 3.4 of the Public Records Act.
Prisoners: Per Capita Costs
The average cost of a prison place comprises the expenditure on public and private prisons (as recorded in the National Offender Management Service (NOMS) Agency Annual Report and Accounts), increased by an apportionment of relevant costs borne centrally and in the regions by NOMS. This involves some estimation. In addition, expenditure met centrally by the Youth Justice Board (YJB) is included. The figures do not include the cost of prisoners held in police or court cells under Operation Safeguard, nor expenditure met by other Government Departments (e.g. health and education). The prisoner escort service costs are included. Where the costs of young people are recharged by NOMS to the YJB, expenditure is shown gross and not reduced by income from the YJB.
For 2008-09 the overall cost of a prison place was £45,000 (to nearest £1,000). This includes expenditure met by NOMS national and regional structures, including Prison Service administration, and the YJB. It does not include expenditure met by other Government Departments (e.g. for health and education).
In general health care and education costs are not included. Where prisons have been contracted out to the private sector the cost to NOMS includes health care and this is included in the cost per place above. In general prisoner education is not included. In general clinical drug addiction services are not included. Services which are the responsibility of NOMS (e.g. drug testing, accredited drug treatment programmes and Counselling, Assessment, Referral advice and Throughcare services) are included. Dog handling costs are included.
Before 2008-09, Her Majesty's Prison Service annual report and accounts included the direct prison cost per place. This included only the expenditure met and managed locally at each prison and excluded expenditure met at area, region or national level. The reported figures included expenditure on health care and education which was recharged to the other Government Departments. It did not include that expenditure met directly by other Government Departments.
Cost per prison place is expressed in terms of the Certified Normal Accommodation number of places; this gives a higher unit cost than the cost per prisoner.
Probation: Per Capita Costs
Costs will vary depending on the nature and intensity of the supervision. The National Audit Office Report (NAO), “The Supervision of Community Orders in England and Wales” (January 2008) included an estimate of the cost of delivering a supervision requirement. The NAO reviewed five probation areas and estimated the average annual cost in those areas of delivering the supervision requirement to be £652. This estimate did not include the cost of probation overheads. Research indicates that female offenders have more identified needs on average than male offenders with a similar risk of re-offending, therefore supervision is often more expensive. The NAO report above did not account for this variable in their estimates. The Specification, Benchmarking and Costing programme in the National Offender Management Service is defining what it should cost to deliver services and this work is due to be completed by 2011.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave him on 23 February 2010, Official Report, column 498W. The current grant for approved premises (formerly known as probation or bail hostels) equates to an average £26,600 per bed space for the current financial year, unchanged from the previous year. More than one resident will occupy a single bed space in approved premises over the course of a year, with an average stay of 74.7 days per resident.
The funding for the supervision of offenders sentenced to unpaid work is part of the general grant provided to probation areas. The actual costs will vary between areas and according to the type of work placement.
The National Offender Management Service Specification Benchmarking and Costing Programme, has produced a service specification for unpaid work / Community Payback based on an assumed operating model. This will enable more accurate calculations of costs and is used by probation areas and Directors of Offender Management to assess Community Payback as part of a best value exercise.
The service specification for unpaid work/Community Payback calculates the cost of commencement, including risk assessment and offender induction during the first two hours of the sentence at £82.40. For an offender attending a weekday work group in an urban area, the ongoing cost is calculated to be £8.83 an hour. The cost of a 160 hour sentence is therefore £1,477.54 and the cost of a 240 hour sentence is £2,183.94. These calculations do not include indirect costs such as premises, which will vary between probation areas. The hourly cost of Community Payback work at agency placements, where supervision is undertaken by the organisation benefiting from the work is less costly, while operating work groups at weekends and in remote locations is proportionally more costly.
The supervision requirement is one of 12 requirements of a community order. The factors taken into account when costing the supervision requirement are:
offender tier (there are four tiers in the National Offender Management Model describing different case management approaches and map against different resource levels and offender manager competences);
the length of the offender's sentence;
the offender's gender;
the grade of staff working with the offender; and
the time taken by staff to deliver the supervision requirement, which includes meetings with the offender, liaison with providers of specialist advice and feeding back to the offender manager. The level of engagement is primarily dependent on the tier of the offender.
Gender of the offender is a factor when costing supervision requirement because the OASys research shows that women offenders at a given tier have on average a higher number of needs than male offenders. Therefore more contact time is assumed for women offenders than male offenders when costing the supervision requirement.
Costs estimated using this bottom up process are not the full costs since they do not include overheads. Full costs of the supervision requirement will be collected and published in order to benchmark the whole of the probation system by the end of 2011.
Probation: West Yorkshire
Between April 2005 and February 2010, 4,135 offenders have completed an accredited programme in the West Yorkshire probation area. In the first four years West Yorkshire probation area consistently over achieved in relation to its completion target for accredited programmes. The data for 2009-10 are for 11 months. Therefore it is not possible to say that this will be the case this year, as achievement for this period is 89 per cent. of the annual target.
A full breakdown by district and programme type is shown in the following tables. Targeting by programme type began in April 2007 and a more detailed breakdown between the various types of programme is available from this point. The accredited “offending behaviour” programme category includes the suite of accredited programmes delivered in West Yorkshire, other than domestic violence and sex offending. This includes thinking skills, substance misuse, and drink driving programmes.
Programme delivery in West Yorkshire is organised within districts. However, in the two smallest districts (Calderdale and Wakefield), delivery is linked to neighbouring larger districts (Bradford and Kirklees). This means that an offender can begin a programme in another district rather than waiting to start in the district in which (s)he is resident. This is good practice in that a prompt start is more likely to result in successful programme completion.
Accredited programme targets have been reduced in the past two years as the probation area has introduced a range of specified activities and alcohol treatment conditions for offenders who pose a lower risk of harm and reoffending, thereby reserving accredited programme provision for the more serious offenders. West Yorkshire plans to expand further its suite of interventions over the next two years to provide sentencers with a broader range of options.
In 2009-10 a target was set for the programme completion rate (by district and programme). Across the probation area performance has exceeded target for offending behaviour and sex offender programmes but not for domestic violence. The range of provision will be increased in 2010 with an introduction of a shorter domestic abuse programme for less serious offenders in order to improve completion rates.
Accredited OBP Domestic violence Sex offender Total completions Comp Target Rate (%) Comp Target Rate (%) Comp Target Rate Comp Target Rate (%) 2005-06 Bradford/ Calderdale — — — — — — — — — 340 248 137 Wakefield/Kirklees — — — — — — — — — 302 248 122 Leeds — — — — — — — — — 241 247 98 West Yorks — — — — — — — — — 883 743 119 2006-07 Bradford/ Calderdale — — — — — — — — — 320 291 110 Wakefield/Kirklees — — — — — — — — — 308 290 106 Leeds — — — — — — — — — 286 290 99 West Yorks — — — — — — — — — 914 871 105 2007-08 Bradford/ Calderdale 259 212 122 65 55 118 22 20 110 346 287 121 Wakefield/Kirklees 183 212 86 51 60 85 22 20 110 256 292 88 Leeds 209 212 99 62 60 103 20 20 100 291 292 100 West Yorks 651 636 102 178 175 102 64 60 107 893 871 103 2008-09 Bradford/ Calderdale 201 188 107 54 50 108 16 20 80 271 258 105 Wakefield/Kirklees 201 188 107 57 50 114 27 20 135 285 258 110 Leeds 201 186 108 57 50 114 18 20 90 276 256 108 West Yorks 603 562 107 168 150 112 61 60 102 832 772 108 2009-10 Bradford/ Calderdale 155 167 93 53 47 113 12 18 67 220 232 95 Wakefield/Kirklees 113 166 68 38 47 81 1 16 6 152 229 66 Leeds 160 166 96 63 47 134 18 18 100 241 231 104 West Yorks 428 499 86 154 141 109 31 52 60 613 692 89 1 The table reflects that (1) the programmes target was not split by type until 2007-08, and (2) West Yorkshire currently divides it targets by super district as some districts deliver programmes for others, and (3) the 2009-10 figures do not include March which historically is the month in which the most completions occur.
Accredited OBP Domestic Violence Sex Offender Rate (%) Target Rate (%) Target Rate (%) Target 2009-10 Bradford/Calderdale 69 65 52 67 88 77 Wakefield/Kirklees 69 65 70 67 90 77 Leeds 60 65 63 67 66 77 West Yorks 66 65 59 67 82 77 1 The completion rate measure has only been introduced in the last financial year. Note: West Yorkshire probation current programmes: Addressing Substance Related Offending Drink Impaired Drivers Thinking Skills Programme Integrated Domestic Abuse Programme Internet Sex Offender Treatment Programme Northumbria Sex Offender Group Programme Enhanced Thinking Skills Programme
Public Sector
The Ministry of Justice is not taking steps to share services, functions and back offices with local authorities as part of the Total Place initiative. However, the Department is supportive of any local partners' decisions on sharing services, functions or back offices to make efficiency savings where they deem it appropriate. The Government's report on Total Place will be published alongside Budget 2010.
Repossession Orders: Mortgages
Tables showing the numbers of claims leading to orders being made for the repossession of property by mortgage lenders and landlords in England and Wales by Government Office Region for 2005 to 2009 are shown as follows. The figures are based on the physical locations of the properties which were the subject of the court actions.
These figures represent the numbers of claims leading to orders being made. This counting basis is more accurate than the number of orders made, because it removes the double-counting of instances where a single claim leads to more than one order. It is also a more meaningful measure of the number of homeowners who are subject to court repossession actions.
These figures do not indicate how many properties have actually been repossessed. Repossessions can occur without a court order being made, while not all court orders result in repossession.
Statistics on mortgage and landlord possession claims in the county courts of England and Wales broken down by region, local authority and court, are published by the Ministry of Justice on a quarterly basis on the Ministry’s website at:
http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/mortgatelandlord possession.htm
Quarter East East Midlands London North East North West South East South West Wales West Midlands Yorkshire and the Humber Not identified Total 2005 1 1,450 1,025 2,565 585 1,680 1,780 1,010 720 1,510 1,175 210 13,710 2 1,880 1,495 3,325 785 2,225 2,370 1,125 1,025 1,750 1,625 235 17,845 3 1,915 1,480 3,405 860 2,440 2,685 1,365 1,055 1,985 1,605 310 19,105 4 1,820 1,575 3,460 825 2,285 2,295 1,190 1,005 1,785 1,755 260 18,260 2006 1 2,120 1,750 3,815 1,020 2,825 2,725 1,400 1,170 2,255 1,920 295 21,295 2 1,985 1,850 3,650 1,105 3,045 2,600 1,325 1,265 2,375 2,005 275 21,475 3 2,155 1,925 3,815 1,395 3,200 2,830 1,485 1,455 2,535 2,225 275 23,295 4 2,080 1,780 3,525 1,350 3,360 2,515 1,305 1,430 2,310 2,085 210 21,950 2007 1 2,050 2,045 3,890 1,315 3,185 2,775 1,305 1,405 2,405 2,135 70 22,580 2 1,930 1,715 3,480 1,250 3,485 2,535 1,365 1,330 2,380 2,165 65 21,695 3 2,105 2,215 3,275 1,415 3,740 2,600 1,380 1,430 2,760 2,425 45 23,390 4 2,095 1,985 3,020 1,385 3,835 2,515 1,395 1,660 2,640 2,420 40 22,990 2008 1 2,380 2,385 3,550 1,455 4,315 2,860 1,615 1,860 3,055 2,670 45 26,200 2 2,760 2,465 3,865 1,775 5,060 3,165 1,890 1,960 3,555 3,025 65 29,585 3 2,710 2,650 3,970 1,775 4,665 3,085 1,905 2,135 3,185 3,135 65 29,285 4 2,390 2,385 3,475 1,660 4,215 2,750 1,805 1,795 3,225 2,940 55 26,695 2009 1 1,580 1,410 2,245 1,115 2,715 1,955 980 1,185 1,550 1,750 35 16,520 2 1,740 1,490 2,810 1,290 3,135 2,205 1,280 1,195 1,970 1,910 15 19,040 3 1,920 1,795 2,870 1,315 3,560 2,265 1,425 1,405 2,185 2,355 20 21,115 4 1,435 1,280 2,100 965 2,385 1,820 990 1,025 1,600 1,875 25 15,495 1 Includes all types of mortgage lenders. 2 The number of claims that lead to an order includes all claims in which the first order, whether outright or suspended, is made during the period. 3 The court, following a judicial hearing, may grant an order for possession immediately. This entitles the claimant to apply for a warrant to have the defendant evicted. However, even where a warrant for possession is issued, the parties can still negotiate a compromise to prevent eviction. 4 Includes outright and suspended orders, the latter being where the court grants the claimant possession but suspends the operation of the order. Provided the defendant complies with the terms of suspension, which usually require the defendant to pay the current mortgage or rent instalments plus some of the accrued arrears, the possession order cannot be enforced. 5 All figures are rounded to the nearest 5. 6 The figures represent the location of the property within each Government Office Region as opposed to the location of the court where the orders were made. Source: Ministry of Justice
Quarter East East Midlands London North East North West South East South West Wales West Midlands Yorkshire and the Humber Not identified Total 2005 1 2,105 1,915 5,700 1,490 3,665 2,915 1,655 1,305 2,565 2,390 1,285 26,985 2 2,290 2,145 6,035 1,415 3,920 2,845 1,660 1,350 2,705 2,515 1,275 28,150 3 2,300 2,060 6,010 1,250 3,665 2,895 1,665 1,620 2,750 2,275 1,220 27,710 4 2,305 2,025 6,015 1,250 3,590 2,785 1,605 1,370 2,555 2,595 975 27,070 2006 1 2,375 2,095 6,165 1,365 3,725 2,755 1,750 1,400 2,785 2,380 995 27,795 2 2,140 1,870 5,845 1,455 3,275 2,550 1,405 1,250 2,485 2,315 710 25,290 3 2,110 1,865 6,230 1,335 3,335 2,535 1,480 1,600 2,745 2,395 580 26,210 4 2,065 1,635 5,160 1,490 3,330 2,530 1,375 1,480 2,430 2,160 475 24,140 2007 1 2,105 1,630 5,700 1,380 3,070 3,095 1,575 1,260 2,495 2,275 300 24,885 2 1,840 1,545 5,595 1,285 3,095 2,515 1,410 1,155 2,415 2,035 195 23,085 3 2,105 1,790 6,000 1,395 3,420 2,775 1,520 1,385 2,750 2,120 200 25,455 4 2,120 1,690 5,940 1,250 3,400 2,745 1,465 1,355 2,735 2,305 190 25,190 2008 1 2,095 1,780 5,950 1,145 3,625 3,065 1,550 1,325 2,665 2,270 190 25,665 2 2,215 1,735 6,255 1,260 3,360 2,885 1,440 1,185 2,760 2,010 170 25,275 3 2,280 1,800 6,665 1,160 3,250 2,770 1,485 1,210 2,605 2,025 160 25,415 4 2,190 1,780 5,625 1,395 3,365 2,670 1,525 1,175 2,645 1,945 140 24,460 2009 1 2,380 1,925 5,765 1,350 3,195 2,840 1,515 1,285 2,350 1,940 105 24,655 2 2,005 1,570 5,590 1,085 2,990 2,640 1,375 1,185 2,210 1,655 100 22,410 3 2,245 1,735 5,755 1,240 3,180 2,810 1,365 1,135 2,285 1,840 75 23,675 4 2,115 1,650 5,405 1,125 2,820 2,615 1,215 1,040 2,290 1,725 60 22,065 1 Includes all types of landlord whether social or private. 2 Landlord actions include those made under both standard and accelerated procedures. The accelerated procedure enables the orders to be made solely on the basis of written evidence for shorthold tenancies, when the fixed period of tenancy has come to an end. 3 The number of claims that lead to an order includes all claims in which the first order, whether outright or suspended, is made during the period. 4 The court, following a judicial hearing, may grant an order for possession immediately. This entitles the claimant to apply for a warrant to have the defendant evicted. However, even where a warrant for possession is issued, the parties can still negotiate a compromise to prevent eviction. 5 Includes outright and suspended orders, the latter being where the court grants the claimant possession but suspends the operation of the order. Provided the defendant complies with the terms of suspension, which usually require the defendant to pay the current mortgage or rent instalments plus some of the accrued arrears, the possession order cannot be enforced. 6 All figures are rounded to the nearest 5. 7 The figures represent the location of the property within each Government Office Region as opposed to the location of the court where the orders were made. Source: Ministry of Justice
Traffic Penalty Tribunal
The Government conducted a public consultation between 25 October 2007 and 1 February 2008 to seek views on which bodies might be included within the scope of the Freedom of Information Act by way of a section 5 order. The Traffic Penalty Tribunal was not nominated as part of this consultation, and so has not been considered for inclusion in the first section 5 order. However, the Government made clear in their response to the consultation published on 16 July 2009 that the first section 5 order would be an initial step, and that the extension of the Act would be kept under review.
The bodies proposed for inclusion in the first section 5 order are:
academy schools
Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO)
financial Ombudsman Service
UCAS.
Victim Support Schemes: Yorkshire and the Humber
In 2008-09 the North Yorkshire Magistrates Courts Witness Service received £74,354 funding from the Government grant to Victim Support.
In the same year the service provided support at magistrates courts in North Yorkshire to 1,905 witnesses.
Young Offenders: Location
The following tables show the percentage of 15 to 19-year-old male and female offenders in young offender institutions (YOIs) who were detained within 20 miles, 30 miles and 40 miles of their home area, as of September 2005 through September to 2008. Information for 2009 has been extracted as of May. Data before September 2005 are not available. Those aged 12 to 14 are not held in YOIs.
All prisoners are asked for details of their home address on first reception to prison and on discharge from prison. About 60 per cent. of prisoners (both male and female) are shown to have given a recognised address. If no address is given, various proxies are used to determine distance from home, including next-of-kin address and committal court address.
Male YOIs (as of September 2005) Percentage of 15-year-olds held within Percentage of 16-year-olds held within Percentage of 17-year-olds held within Percentage of 18-year-olds held within Percentage of 19-year-olds held within 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles Ashfield 3 6 22 9 12 20 13 15 28 9 13 26 0 0 0 Aylesbury n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 16 22 33 14 25 42 Brinsford 50 63 81 61 66 85 52 56 86 63 70 89 64 78 90 Castington 17 67 67 3 34 41 3 27 40 6 29 32 4 50 54 Deerbolt n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 4 7 20 1 4 17 Feltham 30 87 91 25 87 90 28 80 87 37 92 94 34 94 94 Glen Parva n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 9 19 65 17 25 64 Hindley 86 100 100 73 98 98 81 96 96 60 95 97 51 87 88 Huntercombe 0 16 32 4 8 21 8 17 34 9 18 20 n/a n/a n/a Lancaster Farms 0 13 17 0 17 24 1 19 30 4 27 33 1 21 32 Northallerton n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 2 4 3 8 13 Portland n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 9 9 12 9 9 13 Reading n/a n/a n/a 100 100 100 n/a n/a n/a 28 48 57 25 42 55 Rochester n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 11 34 74 16 37 66 Stoke Heath 5 20 40 0 7 34 1 5 26 2 15 31 7 23 49 Swinfen Hall n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 34 45 55 33 43 56 Thorn Cross 100 100 100 55 64 73 38 63 63 14 46 59 27 59 77 Warren Hill 0 0 0 3 5 6 3 8 11 0 4 4 0 50 50 Werrington 0 5 16 8 18 33 7 13 24 0 7 7 n/a n/a n/a Wetherby 29 43 63 26 45 58 32 48 59 22 34 48 n/a n/a n/a
Percentage of 15-year-olds held within Percentage of 16-year-olds held within Percentage of 17-year-olds held within Percentage of 18-year-olds held within Percentage of 19-year-olds held within 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles Ashfield 11 11 16 10 14 26 6 7 15 5 8 28 0 0 33 Aylesbury n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 3 10 19 1 10 26 Brinsford 63 63 74 62 67 87 63 66 82 71 81 86 70 85 91 Castington 7 17 31 5 23 26 11 25 34 4 18 36 6 37 51 Deerbolt n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 4 6 23 5 10 28 Feltham 10 80 95 23 74 83 21 79 86 32 81 84 45 92 93 Glen Parva n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 10 22 55 14 20 61 Hindley 29 81 86 57 82 90 67 83 84 40 85 88 58 87 94 Huntercombe 4 9 32 2 5 22 2 9 30 7 8 25 n/a n/a n/a Lancaster Farms 0 6 26 0 10 17 3 15 26 2 23 34 3 25 30 Northallerton n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 4 6 0 1 3 Portland n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 0 2 2 2 7 Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 33 53 61 28 48 55 Rochester n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 10 35 70 6 36 63 Stoke Heath 4 12 24 3 17 31 3 10 21 3 14 34 1 14 41 Swinfen Hall n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 25 41 50 28 39 47 Thorn Cross 0 50 50 27 36 36 0 47 60 30 55 65 16 36 53 Warren Hill 0 10 10 0 5 7 1 8 10 0 4 13 n/a n/a n/a Werrington 0 0 7 0 0 12 3 5 14 0 11 11 n/a n/a n/a Wetherby 33 53 63 28 43 49 24 41 54 27 42 44 n/a n/a n/a
Percentage of 15-year-olds held within Percentage of 16-year-olds held within Percentage of 17-year-olds held within Percentage of 18-year-olds held within Percentage of 19-year-olds held within 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles Ashfield 15 17 27 11 14 17 7 9 16 8 10 19 0 0 100 Aylesbury n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 2 7 16 1 7 21 Brinsford 80 80 87 60 62 74 53 55 77 61 67 82 66 80 92 Castington 8 31 54 7 33 43 4 33 41 1 38 46 4 36 55 Cookham Wood n/a n/a n/a 9 18 27 0 9 27 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Deerbolt n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 7 24 4 7 23 Feltham 36 73 82 44 67 69 39 74 80 53 85 87 66 97 97 Glen Parva n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 10 35 57 13 39 59 Hindley 38 88 94 76 91 96 63 86 89 45 85 86 50 87 90 Huntercombe 0 11 37 6 13 28 2 10 25 0 5 13 n/a n/a n/a Lancaster Farms 5 29 38 2 10 20 1 25 32 2 25 34 2 22 33 Northallerton n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 0 2 2 Portland n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 2 6 2 2 5 Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 26 39 54 18 38 53 Rochester n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 10 31 69 14 40 75 Stoke Heath 0 19 24 3 7 32 4 13 22 10 19 35 11 23 37 Swinfen Hall n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 24 31 44 26 32 51 Thorn Cross 100 100 100 14 14 29 27 45 45 28 58 67 24 46 56 Warren Hill 8 8 15 7 7 14 4 4 8 7 10 21 n/a n/a n/a Werrington 5 16 21 5 11 18 1 7 16 0 0 0 n/a n/a n/a Wetherby 25 31 50 17 35 54 17 29 44 16 27 36 0 100 100
Percentage of 15-year-olds held within Percentage of 16-year-olds held within Percentage of 17-year-olds held within Percentage of 18-year-olds held within Percentage of 19-year-olds held within 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles Ashfield 15 15 18 8 12 23 10 13 17 10 10 24 0 0 0 Aylesbury n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 6 31 1 9 23 Brinsford 83 83 83 81 81 85 74 76 95 64 67 74 69 74 82 Castington 0 8 25 0 29 32 6 25 32 5 23 31 0 33 41 Cookham Wood 0 43 71 13 20 80 19 65 96 50 100 100 n/a n/a n/a Deerbolt n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 3 6 21 2 5 20 Feltham 67 92 92 46 82 86 58 86 89 68 97 97 68 98 98 Glen Parva n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 13 45 58 15 45 56 Hindley 71 100 100 70 95 95 68 85 87 44 84 86 52 84 88 Huntercombe 3 3 12 2 5 20 3 7 21 6 12 26 n/a n/a n/a Lancaster Farms 0 14 25 0 26 36 1 13 23 4 25 40 5 21 32 Northallerton n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 2 5 2 6 9 Portland n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1 3 1 1 6 Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 39 54 62 28 40 52 Rochester n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 9 29 70 8 32 76 Stoke Heath 10 20 30 9 26 36 2 8 29 12 23 33 10 22 37 Swinfen Hall n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 10 20 30 24 29 45 Thorn Cross n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 25 25 50 17 43 55 Warren Hill 4 8 15 9 9 14 7 8 15 0 0 0 n/a n/a n/a Werrington 0 0 31 5 24 38 1 17 38 0 13 13 n/a n/a n/a Wetherby 23 38 51 26 37 51 23 37 51 15 38 62 n/a n/a n/a
Percentage of 15-year-olds held within Percentage of 16-year-olds held within Percentage of 17-year-olds held within Percentage of 18-year-olds held within Percentage of 19-year-olds held within 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles Ashfield 17 17 35 10 13 16 11 12 17 9 9 15 n/a n/a n/a Aylesbury n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 5 19 1 8 31 Brinsford 82 82 100 56 60 72 72 77 92 61 69 83 69 74 79 Castington 7 27 33 3 21 24 0 25 33 1 19 35 4 30 46 Cookham Wood 25 50 50 17 33 56 21 38 55 36 50 50 n/a n/a n/a Deerbolt n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 6 22 1 4 16 Feltham 52 84 92 52 90 90 57 90 93 67 96 97 69 97 97 Glen Parva n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 7 43 67 13 40 60 Hindley 63 93 96 51 81 88 46 82 92 63 94 94 n/a n/a n/a Huntercombe 4 13 25 3 7 21 3 10 23 0 7 28 n/a n/a n/a Lancaster Farms n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 3 16 22 2 21 26 Northallerton n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 5 7 0 10 13 Portland n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1 4 1 1 4 Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 24 49 58 13 36 54 Rochester n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 9 25 71 8 30 71 Stoke Heath 0 7 21 4 11 22 3 15 29 3 13 22 9 26 39 Swinfen Hall n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 18 27 33 17 24 36 Thorn Cross n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 44 50 50 30 54 63 Warren Hill 0 0 12 3 3 10 7 7 11 9 9 13 n/a n/a n/a Werrington 0 13 44 9 27 42 11 25 46 0 11 17 n/a n/a n/a Wetherby 5 19 27 21 33 46 16 27 39 10 23 38 n/a n/a n/a
Percentage of 15-year-olds held within Percentage of 16-year-olds held within Percentage of 17-year-olds held within Percentage of 18-year-olds held within Percentage of 19-year-olds held within 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles Askham Grange n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 Cookham Wood n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 14 57 0 100 100 n/a n/a n/a Downview n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 17 33 42 0 100 100 n/a n/a n/a Drake Hall n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 100 100 100 33 33 33 Eastwood Park n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 0 6 6 13 25 13 20 33 Foston Hall n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 25 75 100 Holloway n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 73 73 87 55 55 75 Low Newton n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 67 67 67 44 78 78 New Hall n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 25 38 69 16 40 52 48 61 70 Styal n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 45 55 91 36 36 57
Percentage of 15-year-olds held within Percentage of 16-year-olds held within Percentage of 17-year-olds held within Percentage of 18-year-olds held within Percentage of 19-year-olds held within 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles Askham Grange n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 Cookham Wood n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 41 47 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Downview n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 13 27 27 50 50 50 n/a n/a n/a Drake Hall n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eastwood Park n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 6 6 22 6 6 11 10 16 29 Foston Hall n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 0 100 0 0 33 Holloway n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 47 47 50 28 37 44 Low Newton n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 25 25 26 47 53 New Hall n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 21 26 47 18 45 55 27 36 45 Styal n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 29 43 57 40 47 80
Percentage of 15-year-olds held within Percentage of 16-year-olds held within Percentage of 17-year-olds held within Percentage of 18-year-olds held within Percentage of 19-year-olds held within 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles Askham Grange n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 50 50 50 Downview n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 50 64 79 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Drake Hall n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 0 0 25 Eastwood Park n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 0 6 12 12 18 41 Foston Hall n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 8 23 0 100 100 0 33 33 Holloway n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 48 57 62 57 62 68 Low Newton n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 63 63 63 50 50 50 New Hall n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 14 23 32 38 77 77 25 63 75 Styal n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 33 60 87 18 32 64
Percentage of 15-year-olds held within Percentage of 16-year-olds held within Percentage of 17-year-olds held within Percentage of 18-year-olds held within Percentage of 19-year-olds held within 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles Askham Grange n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 Downview n/a n/a n/a 100 100 100 53 53 73 n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 Drake Hall n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 40 40 33 33 33 Eastwood Park n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 0 13 18 18 35 5 11 26 Foston Hall n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 13 27 60 33 67 100 100 100 100 Holloway n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 72 76 80 39 45 61 Low Newton n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 20 20 20 17 33 42 New Hall n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 12 27 38 10 25 45 6 38 56 Styal n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 21 36 64 55 55 64
Percentage of 15-year-olds held within Percentage of 16-year-olds held within Percentage of 17-year-olds held within Percentage of 18-year-olds held within Percentage of 19-year-olds held within 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles 20 miles 30 miles 40 miles Askham Grange n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 Downview n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 50 79 79 33 67 67 67 78 78 Drake Hall n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 11 11 44 Eastwood Park n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 17 17 42 16 16 26 Foston Hall n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 11 22 67 0 100 100 n/a n/a n/a Holloway n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 55 64 64 52 57 57 Low Newton n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 33 33 27 45 45 New Hall n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 7 33 53 6 28 44 53 73 80 Styal n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 11 33 61 21 46 63
Young Offenders: Self-Harm
Self-harm and assault data is submitted by all establishments using the Incident Reporting System or Prison-NOMIS, where prisons have migrated to the new system. The nature of this data and the amount of it means that data can change as investigations are completed, data is revised and re-submitted. Data for 2009 is still being collated and validated. It will be published in July 2010.
Youth Custody
Table 1 details the number of young people aged 12 to 17 held in each secure children's home, secure training centre and young offender institution on 30 June in each year from 2002 to 2009. Information on the young people's ages at the time they were first detained is not held centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
These data have been supplied by the Youth Justice Board and have been drawn from administrative IT systems, which, as with any large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing and may be subject to change over time. Differences in counting rules may mean that figures from other databases are not directly comparable.
Apart from those completing juvenile sentences, young people aged 18 and 19 who are sent to custody are accommodated in the young adult (18 to 20) estate. Table 2 shows the total number of young people in custody aged 18 and 19 on 30 June each year from 2002 to 2009.
Information on the population of individual young adult establishments and on the age of the young people at the time they were first detained is not held centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
These data have been supplied by Justice Statistics Analytical Services and have been drawn from administrative IT systems, which, as with any large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing and may be subject to change over time. Differences in counting rules may mean that figures from other databases are not directly comparable.
Accommodation type Establishment Age 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Secure children's homes Aldine House 12 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 13 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 14 0 5 2 2 2 1 1 1 15 2 0 0 1 2 3 2 1 16 1 1 2 0 0 1 2 2 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Atkinson Unit 12 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 14 8 3 2 5 2 4 2 0 15 2 3 3 2 2 1 6 0 16 2 6 2 2 3 3 0 2 17 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Aycliffe Young People's Centre 12 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 13 3 4 6 1 1 3 5 3 14 11 10 8 8 9 8 7 11 15 10 10 8 10 5 9 8 6 16 6 7 11 9 5 8 4 5 17 3 2 1 2 5 1 1 0 Barton Moss Secure Unit 12 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 0 13 3 0 5 2 2 3 6 4 14 10 11 5 9 8 7 6 8 15 2 7 6 5 7 1 4 5 16 2 0 2 1 0 3 3 1 17 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Briars Hey 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Clare Lodge 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Clayfields House 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 2 0 0 4 3 3 1 2 14 4 5 5 3 5 4 6 5 15 5 5 3 3 3 3 2 3 16 2 5 3 2 1 0 2 2 17 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 Dales House 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 14 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Earlswood Secure Unit 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 East Moor 12 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 13 4 2 4 7 5 4 6 4 14 22 11 11 15 17 17 18 14 15 5 13 12 7 5 7 6 9 16 1 5 4 6 5 3 2 4 17 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Gladstone House 12 1 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 13 1 4 2 2 4 3 0 0 14 3 3 8 4 7 3 0 0 15 3 4 4 4 2 3 0 0 16 0 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 17 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 Hillside 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 1 3 1 0 1 2 1 2 14 4 1 3 5 4 5 5 2 15 5 3 3 6 4 3 4 6 16 3 6 6 2 4 4 1 5 17 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 Kyloe House 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 14 0 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 15 2 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 16 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 17 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 Leverton Secure Unit 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lincolnshire Secure Unit 12 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 13 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 14 3 1 1 0 3 3 2 3 15 0 4 4 4 2 2 3 3 16 1 2 2 3 1 1 1 0 17 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Market Street 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Orchard Lodge 12 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 13 1 1 1 4 1 5 0 0 14 3 8 8 6 8 7 7 1 15 6 6 7 6 6 3 6 3 16 3 5 2 0 2 3 4 1 17 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 0 Red Bank Community Home 12 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 0 13 3 3 3 1 0 3 5 1 14 8 14 8 13 13 6 8 6 15 8 7 12 9 4 9 9 9 16 5 2 2 2 8 5 6 9 17 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 1 Redsands Secure Unit 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Catherines Centre for Girls 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. John's Centre (Tiffield) 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 14 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 15 5 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 16 2 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sutton Place 12 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 13 4 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 14 2 4 5 3 2 1 1 0 15 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 16 0 3 1 2 2 3 2 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stamford House 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stoke House 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Swanwick Lodge 12 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 13 5 3 2 3 2 3 1 0 14 1 5 3 4 2 3 8 4 15 1 0 4 1 2 1 1 3 16 1 0 1 1 2 0 3 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Thornbury House 12 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 14 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vinney Green 12 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 1 13 2 2 1 3 2 2 3 0 14 4 5 7 8 8 5 10 8 15 5 7 5 1 4 8 4 3 16 8 6 4 6 4 4 3 6 17 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 Watling House 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Secure Training Centres Hassockfield STC 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 5 5 6 3 0 0 0 0 14 21 13 10 8 12 23 16 9 15 10 13 15 12 16 19 22 8 16 1 9 4 11 10 14 14 13 17 0 1 1 1 0 2 4 2 Medway 12 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 13 3 6 5 3 1 1 2 5 14 14 25 17 17 21 21 17 13 15 17 18 25 23 16 17 25 27 16 6 14 23 22 20 22 18 17 17 1 2 1 2 6 4 14 5 Oakhill STC 12 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 14 0 0 1 14 17 15 15 23 15 0 0 0 23 20 22 8 30 16 0 0 0 25 28 18 17 19 17 0 0 0 1 7 2 0 4 Rainsbrook 12 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 13 8 7 6 3 2 0 0 3 14 28 24 20 22 22 19 20 10 15 13 23 27 23 19 20 25 27 16 7 22 12 24 26 32 27 36 17 0 0 5 4 3 11 12 5 Young Offender Institutions Ashfield 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 15 28 16 28 23 31 47 40 24 16 79 50 79 77 91 96 113 76 17 119 98 150 174 177 194 205 215 Aylesbury 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Brinsford 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 23 24 26 20 18 18 6 7 16 59 50 67 63 63 49 40 18 17 93 97 92 88 112 78 69 60 Brockhill 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 10 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bullwood Hall 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 27 15 20 16 0 0 0 0 Castington 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 15 18 21 8 16 10 16 11 16 61 39 33 47 34 46 45 27 17 95 86 82 70 77 77 95 87 Cookham Wood 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 22 17 0 0 0 0 14 11 23 54 Downview 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 11 15 13 14 15 Eastwood Park 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 6 7 7 10 18 13 18 14 Feltham 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 41 31 30 30 24 28 24 30 16 75 83 76 61 74 59 63 61 17 198 166 150 137 131 135 147 129 Foston Hall 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 11 12 9 Hindley 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 29 17 19 14 22 11 31 35 16 63 57 34 44 52 47 57 82 17 83 94 98 90 76 85 101 156 Holloway 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 8 11 8 0 1 0 0 0 Huntercombe 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 36 18 27 30 38 30 40 20 16 83 77 92 83 96 109 98 69 17 143 127 175 172 180 165 181 147 Lancaster Farms 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 26 20 25 32 41 25 29 0 16 51 41 51 65 67 74 65 0 17 113 106 107 111 116 119 132 0 Low Newton 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Hall 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 15 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 17 23 34 39 34 23 20 25 21 Onley 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 20 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 62 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 121 116 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parc 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 2 1 1 6 6 2 8 16 4 3 4 2 10 10 22 17 17 9 14 13 13 16 35 40 38 Portland 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stoke Heath 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 18 10 21 21 25 25 20 13 16 55 35 45 39 62 46 61 26 17 101 64 107 113 90 108 118 78 Styal 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Swinfen Hall 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Thorn Cross 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 2 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 16 6 10 13 8 10 6 0 0 17 21 17 16 16 4 13 1 0 Warren Hill 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 9 20 24 23 23 20 23 20 16 53 53 51 58 61 51 68 55 17 100 87 108 106 109 115 112 106 Werrington 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 16 11 13 24 15 18 15 11 16 37 22 42 42 46 39 40 45 17 68 59 60 63 70 63 61 74 Wetherby 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 46 27 46 33 38 40 46 29 16 85 96 76 105 77 93 93 125 17 169 169 133 162 169 172 176 189 Woodhill 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 17 0 0 3 4 4 1 1 0
Age 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 18 2,161 2,069 2,067 2,070 2,159 2,249 2,170 2,215 19 2,841 2,692 2,640 2,748 2,841 3,104 3,221 3,160
Health
Blood: Contamination
The following table shows the number of patients reported to have acquired a bacterial infection from transfusion of blood components in England and North Wales (the area covered by NHS Blood and Transplant) between 1 April 2008 and 31 December 2009 (20 months). Complete data for 2009-2010 are not yet available. In total, eight recipients were reported to have received a bacterial transfusion-transmitted infection, three of whom died. There are around 2.4 million transfusions in England and Wales annually.
Financial year Number of infected recipients Number of recipients experiencing major morbidity1 Number of fatalities 2008-092 7 5 2 2009-103 1 0 1 1 Major morbidity is defined as any symptomatic confirmed transfusion-transmitted infection. 2 1 April 2008 to 31 March 2009. 3 Data available from 1 April 2009 to 31 December 2009 only.
Blood Donors
The information is not available in the format requested. Such information as is available is in the following table, based on numbers of donations in each of the four main London areas.
2009-102 2008-09 2007-08 2006-07 2005-06 2004-05 2003-04 2002-03 2001-02 2000-01 Total London North and West 54,289 55,049 51,782 52,654 61,919 62,048 67,286 61,853 55,820 51,785 574,485 City and Essex 37,421 40,420 39,414 41,912 48,489 52,723 55,102 50,368 47,231 41,211 454,291 London South West and Surrey 58,930 61,719 63,215 63,805 65,382 68,805 71,929 66,236 59,843 54,865 634,729 London South East and North Kent 53,738 56,099 58,751 60,402 64,121 70,673 73,523 68,531 64,051 58,970 628,859 Total 204,378 213,287 213,162 218,773 239,911 254,249 267,840 246,988 226,945 206,831 229,2364 1 Data are not collated centrally on the number of blood donations collected by London boroughs. 2 Figures given until 21 March 2010. Source: NHS Blood and Transplant
(2) how much donated blood each London (a) hospital and (b) borough had in reserve in each year since 2000;
(3) how much donated blood each London (a) hospital and (b) borough could not be used for each reason in each year since 2000.
The information is not available in the format requested. However, as soon as the available information can be produced, a copy will be placed in the Library.
(2) how much his Department plans to spend on advertising to encourage people to donate blood in each London borough in the next five years.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave to the hon. Member for Vale of Clwyd (Chris Ruane) on 9 December 2009, Official Report, column 467W (for years 2001-02 and 2008-09).
Information on funds spent on marketing activities by the NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) are held for England and North Wales only and cannot be broken down by local area. NHSBT's combined budget in 2009-10 for marketing activities for blood and organ donation is £19,990,933 million1. The provisional total budget for 2010-11 is £16,626,941. Figures for planned advertising for 2011-12 and beyond are not yet available.
1 The extra costs for 2009-10 were due to increased advertising needed to increase blood stock levels to 65,000 in anticipation of the flu pandemic, together with additional advertising to raise awareness of organ donation and increase the number of registrations on the organ donor register.
The information is not available in the format requested. Such information as is available is in the table.
Distribution of donated blood across England and North Wales is co-ordinated nationally. In 2009-10, the estimated requirement for red cells across England and North Wales is 1,878,000 units, increasing to 1,896,000 units in 2010-11. The NHS Blood and Transplant’s (NHSBT) planning assumptions for the next three years anticipate 1 per cent. in need.
The number of donations the National Blood Service (part of the NHSBT) is aiming to collect in London and the South East in 2009-10 and 2010-11 is shown as follows. Data for likely donations beyond 2010-11 are not yet available.
Area1 Target 2009-10 Target 2010-11 London North and West 55,376 67,339 City and Essex 40,615 39,050 London South East and North Kent 55,346 55,627 London South West and Surrey 63,544 60,714 Total 214,881 222,730 1 Data are not collated centrally on the number of blood donations likely to be needed nor collected in each London hospital or borough. Available data are shown by London area.
Cervical Cancer Screening
For period 2008-09 (the latest period for which the figures are available) 78.6 per cent. of women did not receive their cervical screening test results within two weeks. However, test results were available for 21.4 per cent. of women within two weeks compared to 11.1 per cent. in 2007-08, and 65.5 per cent. were available within four weeks compared to 59.6 per cent. in 2007-08.
It is a Vital Sign of the ‘NHS Operating Framework 2010-11’, a copy of which has already been placed in the Library, that all women should receive the results of their cervical screening tests within two weeks by 2010. 10 pilot programmes have achieved 14-day turnaround times for at least 99 per cent. of tests and with significant reductions in failed tests and in resource requirements. This is now being rolled out across the country.
Community Hospitals: Finance
Since July 2006, the Government have allocated around £250 million in capital funding towards 28 schemes through the Community Hospitals Programme.
The following table shows the total notional allocations made to each scheme when the programme was launched in 2006:
Primary care trust Scheme £ million (rounded) Sunderland Teaching Washington Primary Care Centre 8.95 Hartlepool Hartlepool Primary Care Facility 3.00 Stockport St Thomas' 26.60 Calderdale PCT Calderdale and Kirklees Community Services 13.08 Kirklees PCT Rotherham Rotherham Primary Care Centre 0.96 North Yorkshire and York Selby Health and Community Campus 13.04 East Riding of Yorkshire East Riding Community Hospitals (Beverley, Hornsea and Driffield) 17.00 Nottingham County Teaching Ashfield Community Hospital 1.15 Worcestershire Malvern Community Hospital 19.22 Suffolk Felixstowe General Hospital 1.76 Haringey Hornsey Community Hospital 1.66 Barking and Dagenham Barking Hospital 5.00 Richmond and Twickenham Teddington Health and Social Care Centre 3.98 Barnet Finchley Memorial Hospital 9.90 Kensington and Chelsea St. Charles Hospital 10.50 Greenwich Eltham and Mottingham Hospital 4.58 Hastings and Rother Hastings Primary Health Care Centre 12.29 Eastern and Coastal Kent Health and Social Care Centre at Kings Avenue, Ashford, Kent 9.00 Hampshire Gosport War Memorial Hospital 6.12 Southampton Royal South Hants Hospital 6.08 Portsmouth City Teaching St. Mary's Community Hospital 17.10 Buckinghamshire Thame 4.00 South Gloucestershire Yate Community Health Centre 5.00 Somerset Minehead Healthy Living Park 24.50 Bristol South Bristol Community Hospital 3.90 Bath and North East Somerset Keynsham Health Park 5.80 Gloucestershire Berkeley Vale 6.40 Gloucestershire North Cotswolds 13.20 Total notional allocation — 253.77
We do not hold information centrally on local profiling of expenditure for community hospitals. It is for strategic health authorities to work with their primary care trusts to monitor progress and support local management on individual schemes.
Drugs and Alcoholic Drinks
Primary care trusts (PCTs) are responsible for providing and commissioning health services to meet the health care needs of their local populations. It also for PCTs to consider the effectiveness of services commissioned. This includes the provision of drug and alcohol rehabilitation services.
The Department and the National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse (NTA) provide advice, guidance and data to help PCTs better understand their local drug and alcohol service needs. Local drug commissioning partnerships are responsible for commissioning drug treatment services from national health service and voluntary sector organisations, and all partnerships will produce local drug treatment plans that set out how they plan to improve the delivery of drug treatment locally. The NTA's regional teams will monitor the performance of partnerships and the services they commission by measuring performance against locally set targets, which are set out in treatment plans.
The NTA's north-west regional team assesses the performance of the Lancashire Drug and Alcohol Action Team, and the drug services it commissions, on an annual and ongoing basis.
(2) how much funding his Department made available to primary care trusts for drug and alcohol rehabilitation services in the latest period for which figures are available.
Direct central Government funding for drug treatment through the pooled treatment budget in 2010-11 is £406.7 million. In addition, an estimated £200 million is spent locally by primary care trusts on adult drug services.
No decision has been taken regarding future Government funding for drug services.
The cost of alcohol treatment is met through national health service mainstream expenditure according to local needs and priorities.
Residential rehabilitation is funded by local authority social services through their Community Care Act responsibilities.
Decisions on future funding for alcohol treatment will be made at a local level in line with local needs.
Criteria for entry to drug and alcohol treatment programmes are determined at a local level between treatment providers and commissioners.
The Department of Health, National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse and the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence have issued commissioning guidance and effectiveness reviews to assist providers and commissioners in this process.
Eyesight Testing
Free sight tests are available under the national health service to large parts of the population including people aged 60 and over, children under 16, those aged 16-18 in full-time education, people on benefits, those people at particular risk of developing eye disease, and people who are registered blind or partially sighted or who have a complex spectacle prescription. Sight tests allow the opportunity to review all aspects of eye health, including investigations for signs of disease. Those at risk of specific eye disease (e.g. diabetic retinopathy) may be asked to attend regular screening.
Information about the extensive arrangements for providing help with NHS optical services and other health costs is published in leaflet HC11 “Are you entitled to help with health costs?” Posters are also available for display in optical practices and hospital out-patient departments. A copy of the leaflet has already been placed in the Library.
The uptake of NHS sight tests continues to increase. In 2008-09, there were 11.3 million NHS sight tests, an increase of 2.1 per cent. on 2007-08.
The Department is also supporting National Eye Health Week which will be held between 14 and 18 June and is aiming to promote the importance of regular sight tests.
Glaucoma: Bolton
The information is not available in the format requested. The information that is available is shown in the following table.
Activity in English national health service hospitals and English NHS commissioned activity in the independent sector Finished consultant episodes 2008-09 48 2007-08 26 2006-07 34 1 A finished consultant episode (FCE) is a continuous period of admitted patient care under one consultant within one healthcare provider. FCEs are counted against the year in which they end. Figures do not represent the number of different patients, as a person may have more than one episode of care within the same stay in hospital or in different stays in the same year. 2 The primary diagnosis is the first of up to 20 (14 from 2002-03 to 2006-07 and seven prior to 2002-03) diagnosis fields in the HES data set and provides the main reason why the patient was admitted to hospital. The ICD-10 codes that have been used to define glaucoma are H40—Glaucoma and Q15.0 Congenital glaucoma. 3 Assessing growth through time. HES figures are available from 1989-90 onwards. Changes to the figures over time need to be interpreted in the context of improvements in data quality and coverage (particularly in earlier years), improvements in coverage of independent sector activity (particularly from 2006-07) and changes in NHS practice. For example, apparent reductions in activity may be due to a number of procedures which may now be undertaken in out-patient settings and so no longer include in admitted patient HES data. Note: HES are compiled from data sent by more than 300 NHS trusts and PCTs in England and from some independent sector organisations for activity commissioned by the English NHS. The NHS Information Centre for health and social care liaises closely with these organisations to encourage submission of complete and valid data and seeks to minimise inaccuracies. While this brings about improvement over time, some shortcomings remain. Source: The NHS Information Centre for health and social care, Hospital Episode Statistics (HES)
Health Education
(2) what steps his Department is taking to encourage GPs to increase the number of their patients self-caring for minor ailments.
Community pharmacies already support people to self care, providing advice on how to treat or manage their minor ailments and appropriate use of over-the-counter medicines. They are conveniently located on the high street, in the community and in supermarkets. The pharmacy communications programme, currently underway, aims to raise awareness of the services available from pharmacies.
Information on self care support, including "Making the most of your pharmacist" is available through Your health, your way on NHS Choices. NHS Choices and NHS Direct offer facilities, such as online symptom checkers and self assessment tools, to help people understand where self care is appropriate in the treatment of minor ailments and when they should seek advice from medical professionals. NHS Choices also provides online advice about accidents to children at home and details a number of instances when children should be taken to hospital.
A range of material about self care and personalised care planning is available for health and social care professionals. This aims to raise awareness of the choices of self care options available and how to incorporate self care into personalised care planning discussions.
In addition, a web-based training module for clinicians and other professionals is offered through the national learning management system - Supporting Self Care was developed with the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and DH e-learning for Healthcare. It is also available to GPs as part of their e-GP training materials.
The Department fully supports a greater focus on self care. With proper support from the NHS and health professionals, such as GPs and pharmacists, people can take more responsibility for their own health and wellbeing.
Health Services
Primary care trusts are legally required to make funding available for drugs and treatments recommended by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) as part of a technology appraisal within three months of NICE'S final guidance being published. Patients also have a right to receive such treatments, where clinically appropriate, under the NHS Constitution. There is a small number of technology appraisals for which this legal requirement has been waived or amended.
Health Services: Asbestos
The written ministerial statement my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor (Mr. Straw) made on 25 February, Official Report columns 79-83WS, expressed the Government's determination to expand research in the area of asbestos related disease.
Our first priority is to take steps to build research capacity, particularly in mesothelioma research. The Department will work to that end with the British Lung Foundation and others with a particular interest. The initiative will be supported by a donation of £3 million from the Association of British Insurers.
The National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) has a central role to play in maintaining strategic oversight of cancer research in the United Kingdom. The institute reported in 2006 on the state of lung cancer research. I believe the time is right for the institute to undertake a fresh review of mesothelioma research. I will write to Sir Kenneth Caiman, the Chair of the Institute, asking him to initiate such a review, and to report on its findings by the end of the summer.
The mesothelioma sub-group of the NCRI's lung cancer clinical studies group has an important role in the development of clinical trials. We will ensure the contribution the sub-group has to make is maximised.
The outcome of the NCRI review and other developments will underpin the future strategies and work of the Institute's partner funders, and will help develop the potential to drive an increase in research investment in mesothelioma and other asbestos related
disease research, and will inform the Government's longer term approach. Progress on all this will be reported in the autumn.
Health Services: Devon
(2) what funding his Department allocated to health authorities in England (a) in total and (b) per head of population for 1995-96.
In 1995-96, revenue allocations for Devon were within the allocation for South Western Regional Health Authority. Revenue allocations in 1995-96 for South Western Regional Health Authority and the total for England are given in the following table, along with the allocation per head.
Allocation (£ million) Per-head allocation (£) South Western Regional Health Authority 2,953,543 450 England 23,023,897 471 Note: Prior to 1996-97, revenue allocations were made to Regional Health Authorities. Source: Financial Planning and Allocations Division, Department of Health
Health Services: Greater London
The report “Delivering Healthcare for London—An Integrated Strategic Plan 2010-2015” is a NHS London report, not Department of Health.
Information is not available in the format requested. Since 2000-01, the Department has collected annual data on internal floor areas from national health service trusts through the Estates Returns Information Collection (ERIC). Data collection on each NHS organisation's gross internal floor area and unoccupied internal floor area first began in 2000-01, with non-patient occupied floor area beginning in 2002-03.
The information provided has been supplied by the NHS and has not been amended centrally. The accuracy and completeness of the information is the responsibility of the provider organisation.
Health Visitors: South West
The information is not available in the format requested. Such information as is available is in the following table.
Headcount 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 South West SHA area 1,241 1,232 1,301 1,275 1,146 1,137 1,117 Bath and North East Somerset Primary Care Trust (PCT) 54 52 54 51 49 46 43 Bournemouth and Poole PCT 92 60 78 88 83 73 78 Bristol Teaching PCT 65 89 151 138 134 122 123 Cornwall and Isles of Scilly PCT 108 110 108 114 110 107 109 Devon PCT 144 137 132 131 138 125 116 Dorset PCT 100 141 105 115 97 91 89 Gloucestershire PCT 176 154 161 152 80 129 134 North Somerset PCT 40 36 37 39 38 38 39 Plymouth Teaching PCT 78 88 87 81 67 '65 70 Somerset PCT 106 55 106 133 125 112 101 South Gloucestershire PCT 57 83 71 45 46 55 52 Swindon PCT 47 52 47 39 46 43 35 Torbay Care Trust 29 29 30 29 28 26 26 Wiltshire PCT 132 132 121 111 97 95 96 Notes: 1. South West SHA area total includes a small number of staff who are employed by NHS trusts. 2. It is not possible to map accurate work force figures for these organisations prior to the formation of the PCTs in 2002. 3. The drop in numbers for Gloucestershire PCT in 2006 seems to be due to a local coding issue. It appears that around 50 health visitors were coded as district nurses in 2006, then recoded as Health Visitors in 2007. 4. Data Quality: The NHS Information Centre for health and social care seeks to minimise inaccuracies and the effect of missing and invalid data but responsibility for data accuracy lies with the organisations providing the data. Methods are continually being updated to improve data quality where changes impact on figures already published. This is assessed but unless it is significant at national level figures are not changed. Impact at detailed or local level is footnoted in relevant analyses. Source: The NHS Information Centre for health and social care Non-Medical Workforce Census.
Hospitals: Waiting Lists
The information is not available in the format requested. The information that is available has been placed in the Library.
This information requested is contained in "18 Weeks Referral to Treatment Data January 2010—Central and Eastern Cheshire, North West and England" which has been placed in the Library.
Malnutrition: Greater London
Information is not held by the format requested. The following table provides a count of admissions where there was a primary diagnosis of malnutrition for patients who were treated within London strategic health authority by selected age groups.
Total 0-24 years 25-49 years 50-74 years 75+ years Unknown 2008-09 50 6 13 17 13 1 2007-08 52 8 19 18 7 0 2006-07 45 8 9 19 9 0 2005-06 44 * * 15 16 0 2004-05 45 * 12 20 * 0 2003-04 42 7 16 10 9 0 2002-03 48 12 9 17 9 1 2001-02 47 9 * 20 13 * 2000-01 39 9 9 13 8 0 1Finished admission episodesA finished admission episode (FAE) is the first period of in-patient care under one consultant within one health care provider. FAEs are counted against the year in which the admission episode finishes. Admissions do not represent the number of in-patients, as a person may have more than one admission within the year. 2Primary diagnosis The primary diagnosis is the first of up to 20 (14 from 2002-03 to 2006-07 and seven prior to 2002-03) diagnosis fields in the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data set and provides the main reason why the patient was admitted to hospital. 3ICD10 Clinical CodesThe ICD-10 codes for malnutrition are: E40.X Kwashiorkor E41.X Nutritional marasmus. 4SHA of treatment This field is derived from the hospital provider code (procode). It indicates the strategic health authority (SHA) area within which the treatment took place. Notes: 1. Small numbersTo protect patient confidentiality, figures between 1 and 5 have been replaced with “*” (an asterisk). Where it was still possible to identify numbers from the total an additional number. 2. Data qualityHES are compiled from data sent by more than 300 NHS trusts and primary care trusts PCTs in England and from some independent sector organisations for activity commissioned by the English NHS. The NHS Information Centre for health and social care liaises closely with these organisations to encourage submission of complete and valid data and seeks to minimise inaccuracies. While this brings about improvement over time, some shortcomings remain. 3. Assessing growth through timeHES figures are available from 1989-90 onwards. Changes to the figures over time need to be interpreted in the context of improvements in data quality and coverage (particularly in earlier years), improvements in coverage of independent sector activity (particularly from 2006-07) and changes in NHS practice. For example, apparent reductions in activity may be due to a number of procedures which may now be undertaken in out-patient settings and so no longer include in admitted patient HES data. Source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), The NHS Information Centre for health and social care.
(2) whether he has made a recent estimate of the cost per bed day of treating a patient with malnutrition in each London borough.
The information requested is not held centrally.
Medical Records: Children
This is a complex matter on which the National Information Governance Board is considering advice. Officials are providing advice as a matter of urgency.
Medical Treatments
The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) provides advice to the national health service on promoting good health and preventing and treating ill health. NICE does not commission services.
The Department published its response to the consultation Strengthening National Commissioning on 19 March 2010. The document can be found on the Department's website at:
www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Responsestoconsultations/DH_114298
A copy has been placed in the Library.
We are now working with the National Specialised Commissioning Team to set up the new advisory group and appoint its members. We intend that the new group will become operational in time to begin commissioning services from April 2011.
The National Specialised Commissioning Group will not have a role in deciding what services are commissioned nationally. It will concentrate on regional and supra-regionally commissioned services.
Mesothelioma
Information for people with mesothelioma is available from the British Lung Foundation, the Department for Work and Pensions, and other sources. Information leaflets for clinicians and for the general public about the health implications of pleural plaques have been commissioned from, respectively, the British Thoracic Society and the British Lung Foundation. We understand that these leaflets will be published in the near future.
Neuromuscular Services: West Midlands
(2) how many whole time equivalent consultant paediatric neurologists with specialism in neuromuscular conditions are employed in the West Midlands Strategic Health Authority area.
This information is not collected centrally. However, this information may be available directly from West Midlands Strategic Health Authority.
Northwick Park Hospital: Manpower
Data is not available in the format requested. Data is collected by trust and is shown in the following table.
Hospital and Community Health Services (HCHS): medical, dental and non-medical staff within North West London Hospitals NHS Trust
As at 30 September 2008 Number HCHS Doctors of which: 698 Consultant 208 Doctors in training and equivalents1 430 Professionally qualified clinical staff 2,731 Qualified nursing, midwifery and health visiting staff 2,006 Qualified scientific, therapeutic and technical staff (ST and T) 725 Qualified Allied Health Professions 332 Qualified Healthcare Scientists 220 Other Qualified Scientific, therapeutic and technical staff 173 Support to clinical staff 1,260 Support to doctors and nursing staff 1,050 Support to ST and T staff 210 NHS infrastructure support 400 Central functions 236 Hotel, property and estates 77 Managers and senior managers 87 1 Doctors in training and equivalents (previously known as junior doctors) is the term used to refer to people in the registrar group, senior house officers, house officers and other staff in equivalent grades who are not in an educationally approved post. 2 The NHS Information Centre for health and social care seeks to minimise inaccuracies and the effect of missing and invalid data but responsibility for data accuracy lies with the organisations providing the data. Methods are continually being updated to improve data quality. Where changes impact on figures already published, this is assessed but unless it is significant at national level figures are not changed. Impact at detailed or local level is footnoted in relevant analyses. Source: The NHS Information Centre for health and social care Medical and Dental Workforce Census.
Primary Care Trusts: Finance
The NHS Operating Framework for 2010-11 stated that strategic health authorities must ensure that primary care trusts do not recurrently commit the totality of their recurrent funding in their 2010-11 plans, such that at least 2 per cent. of recurrent funding at the aggregate regional level is only ever committed non-recurrently.
The reason primary care trusts need to do this is to ensure that they have flexibility in their spending plans to provide the capability to manage risk and volatility.
Primary Care Trusts: Information Officers
The Department does not hold this information. The number of staff employed in communications and public relations activity is a matter that is determined locally (at PCT level) based on local communications need.
Tuberculosis
In June 2007, the Department published a toolkit in to help the national health service to implement the key points of the Chief Medical Officer's Action ‘Plan Stopping Tuberculosis in England’ (October 2004) through effective commissioning and delivery of services. A copy of the plan has already been placed in the Library. This recommended a comprehensive approach to commissioning to include a wide range of stakeholders including community services used by those at high risk (and those being treated for Tuberculosis) and through development of locally targeted health promotion and awareness raising.
TB Alert are funded by the Department to help local primary care trusts develop targeted awareness raising, much of this to be delivered through partnerships with other local services working with risk groups.
Business, Innovation and Skills
Broadband
Consumers need to be properly informed about the services they are paying for and it is incumbent upon service providers to make this clear to their customers. Section 27(f) of Ofcom's voluntary Code of Practice for broadband speeds calls for Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to:
“explain to the consumer in a clear and meaningful way that the actual throughput speed [...] experienced by a consumer will be influenced by a number of factors including the ISP's network capacity, the ISP's traffic shaping and management policy, the number of subscribers online at any one time, by time of day etc.”.
It is important that such information is made available by all providers. Changes to the European electronic communications framework directives which were agreed at the end of 2009 require:
“undertakings providing public electronic communications networks and/or publicly available electronic communications sendees to [...] provide information on any procedures put in place by the provider to measure and shape traffic so as to avoid filling or overfilling a network link, and on how those procedures could impact on sendee quality” (Citizen's Rights amending directive article 21.3 (d)).
This Department will be bringing forward secondary legislation to implement these changes in the UK by 25 May 2011 and will consult fully on the changes over the summer.
Business: Government Assistance
Since the Enterprise Finance Guarantee (EFG) became operational in January 2009 banks have offered loans totalling nearly £850.7 million to 8,378 businesses. It is then up to each SME to decide how much of their offered loans they wish to utilise, i.e. ‘draw down’. To date, nearly 7,000 SMEs have drawn down £700.1 million of EFG-backed bank loans.
Departmental Buildings
This Department has not built any smoking shelters for its staff since it was established.
Departmental Telephone Services
The Department holds central information on six public information helplines. These are listed in the following table with the contract arrangements that are in place.
Helpline Telephone number(s) Contract arrangements BIS Publication Orderline 0845 015 0010 0845 015 0020 0845 015 0030 BIS has a contract with EC Group to manage requests for publication services. Business Link 0845 600 9006 BIS has a contract with BT for the main contact number that routes callers automatically to their local Business Link office. Pay and Work Rights 0800 917 2368 This service includes the former BIS helplines for National Minimum Wage and Employment Agency Standards. BIS provides funding for the Pay and Work Rights Helpline which is a COI managed framework contract delivered by BSS. Queens Award Office 020 7215 6880 The service is managed in-house. BIS Export Control Organisation 020 7215 4594 The service is managed in-house. BIS Import Licensing Branch 01642 364 333 The service is managed in-house.
Educational Institutions: Finance
The Department routes funding through the Learning and Skills Council (LSC) for the provision of further education (FE) and skills training for adult learners aged 19 and over, including those attending the 16 specialist land-based colleges in England.
In the 2008/09 academic year the LSC allocated £23,377,000 to specialist land-based colleges to deliver Adult Learner Responsive provision (ALR) and £22,684,000 for 2009/10. Although the allocations for five land-based colleges increased, there was an overall decrease in ALR allocation between 2008/09 and 2009/10. Across the FE and skills sector there was a decrease in ALR funding that reflected a commitment to increase funding for Train to Gain and Apprenticeships and away from Developmental Learning. Development Learning is defined as provision that is not aligned to one of the priority qualification categories: these are Full Level 2 (equivalent to 5 GCSEs at A*-C), Full Level 3 (2 A Levels or equivalent), Level 4, Foundation Learning and Skills for Life.
Funding allocations for 2010/11 academic year have not yet been finalised but final allocation letters are due to be sent to FE Colleges and Training Organisations from the end of March. The scale of future settlements is dependent on the outcome of the ongoing comprehensive spending review.
General Agreement on Trade in Services: EU Action
The European Commission negotiates on behalf of member states on all trade in services issues, including Mode 4, at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and in negotiations to establish in Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) and Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs).
The Commission regularly consults member states on the content of relevant trade in services negotiations, including on Mode 4.
Formally, this consultation takes place via the Trade Policy Committee (TPC), especially the TPC (Services and Investment) which generally meets fortnightly and which is attended by officials from my Department.
Higher Education: Admissions
No funding has been allocated by the Learning and Skills Council for development projects at any higher education establishment in London for the period 2008-11.
Higher Education: Finance
The Learning and Skills Council has not approved any capital project funding bids from higher education establishments in the last five years either on an in principle or a detailed basis and has, therefore, made no such assessments nor offered such financial assistance.
Internet
There are several legitimate reasons why a network provider may need to introduce traffic management measures, particularly in order to avoid network congestion; ensure delivery of e-mail services or to avoid poor performance. There is currently no evidence that network providers in the UK are using traffic management in illegitimate ways.
The legitimate uses of traffic management are recognised by the new provision in Article 22 of the Universal Services Directive which addresses “Quality of Service” issues. Article 22.3 states that:
“In order to prevent the degradation of service and the hindering or slowing down of traffic over networks, Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities are able to set minimum quality of service requirements on an undertaking or undertakings providing public communications networks”.
Recital 34 suggests that such measures
“should be subject to scrutiny by the national regulatory authorities, [...], in order to ensure that they do not restrict competition”
This Department is currently working on implementing this and related provisions, and will be consulting in due course.
Manganese Bronze
The Department has regular meetings with LTI Ltd. (as part of Manganese Bronze Holdings plc) on a range of issues.
LTI Ltd., as part of Manganese Bronze Holdings plc, has participated in the Vehicle Scrappage Scheme which was launched in May 2009.
On 17 March 2010, Manganese Bronze stated that 223 vehicles were sold under the scheme in 2009—which equates to Government support of £223,000.
The Department has regular meetings with LTI Ltd. (as part of Manganese Bronze Holdings plc) on a range of issues including manufacturing at Coventry.
Post Offices: National Lottery
(2) what estimate he has made of the likely change in bill payment income for sub-post offices as a result of the National Lottery Commission's proposal to permit lottery terminals to provide commercial services.
[holding answer 18 March 2010]: Camelot's proposal to provide commercial services through lottery terminals is still subject to the regulatory approval of the National Lottery Commission. If the commission consents to Camelot's proposal, Post Office Limited will carry out an assessment of the impact on sub post offices.
Qualifications and Curriculum Framework: Finance
The figure of £40 million referred to in the LSC document was an estimate of costs. Subsequent consideration led to a much-reduced figure such that actual spend on IT-related business change for the QCF was £0.47 million in 2008-09, and is expected to be around £2.14 million in 2009-10. These figures were included in the table given in my previous answer.
Radio Frequencies
The Department for Business innovation and Skills (BIS) and the Office of Communications (Ofcom) are aware of this long-standing area of concern. Ofcom is responsible for the UK management of the radio spectrum. Ofcom has commissioned an independent study into the likelihood and extent of radio frequency interference caused by Power Line Technology apparatus. This study is virtually complete and is expected to be published next month. BIS and Ofcom will then review any action that might be necessary based on this report.
World War II: Lapel Badges
Government truly value the important wartime contributions and sacrifices made by all civilian workers.
The Department has received 23 representations over the last two years seeking formal recognition for civilian workers during world war two.
Careful consideration has been given to this issue. However, there are no present plans to introduce a lapel badge.
Written Questions: Government Responses
I refer the hon. Member to the answer given by my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister on 23 March, Official Report, column 256W, and the answer I gave on 24 March, Official Report, column 401W.
International Development
Developing Countries: Tuberculosis
The Department for International Development (DFID) aims to ensure that all organisations supported by UK aid have robust systems to monitor and measure their impact. The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria (GFATM) reports regularly against targets and continually analyses how their monitoring and reporting systems can be improved. DFID is providing £6 billion to strengthen health systems in developing counties from 2008-15. A significant portion of this funding is being used to develop health information management systems that will assist in measuring the progress and effectiveness of tuberculosis control programmes.
Many tuberculosis control programmes have reported 80 per cent. cure rates using the Directly Observed Therapy, Short-course (DOTS) monitoring system. DOTS is an effective strategy supported by the World Health Organisation and used by many programmes supported by DFID to monitor their success.
International Assistance
The Department for International Development’s (DFID’s) health portfolio review will be published later this year and will be available at
www.dfid.gov.uk
Treasury
Departmental Official Hospitality
HM Treasury's accounting system does not identify spending by event and the information for HM Treasury and the Office of Government Commerce could not be provided within the disproportionate costs threshold.
The Debt Management Office held just one official hospitality event in the past three years to mark the 10th anniversary of the organisation at a cost of £9,000.
Maternity Benefits
The ‘Health in Pregnancy Grant’ is a one-off, tax-free payment from HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) for mothers-to-be who are at least 25 weeks pregnant to help them prepare for the birth of their baby. Further information is available at:
http://campaigns2.direct.gov.uk/money4mum2be/en/
The information requested is available only at disproportionate cost, due to the complexity of estimating the overall number of mothers-to-be who are eligible for the Health in Pregnancy Grant.
Royal Bank of Scotland: Loans
Both HM Treasury and UK Financial investments officials hold frequent discussions with the Royal Bank of Scotland on a range of topics. As was the case with previous Administrations, it is not the Government's practice to provide details of such discussions.
Smuggling: Alcoholic Drinks
Diversion of alcohol without payment of excise duty is the most prevalent form of alcohol fraud. Estimates of tax losses are produced by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) annually for spirits, the latest of which are published in ‘Measuring Tax Gaps—2009’. This publication is available in the House of Commons Library. Reliable estimates for wine and beer are not yet available.
In Budget 2009, the Chancellor announced a comprehensive programme of work for 2009-10 involving HMRC and UK Border Agency renewing their strategy to tackle alcohol fraud. The strategy comprises measures to prevent fraud as well as tackle evasion and criminality, and has three broad themes:
Changing the law—to make life tougher for criminals and easier for honest businesses;
Working with honest businesses—to secure legitimate supply chains and make it harder for criminals to source alcohol; and
Strengthening operational response—to co-ordinate efforts to detect, disrupt and dismantle organised criminal networks and illicit supply chains.
HMRC is currently in the process of implementing this strategy.
Taxation: Car Washes
HM Revenue and Customs conducts inquires each year into many thousands of people operating in the hidden economy, including in car washing and valeting services. However, no assessment has been made of the tax losses from this sector above.
Welfare Tax Credits: Overpayments
HM Revenue and Customs' (HMRC) Code of Practice 26 ‘What happens if we’ve paid you too much tax credit?’ explains its approach to tax credits overpayments and the circumstances in which customers may not have to pay them back. It is available at:
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/leaflets/cop26.pdf
(i) Information about the value of disputed tax credits overpayments written off in each year from 2005-06 to 2008-09 is in the table:
Value of disputed written overpayments written off (£000) 2005-06 180,016 2006-07 9,042 2007-08 7,276 2008-09 28,242
(ii) HMRC does not record the value of overpayments written off as a result of claimant error.
Cabinet Office
Business: Berkshire
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.
Letter from Stephen Penneck, dated March 2010:
As Director General for the Office for National Statistics, I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question concerning how many small businesses have closed in (a) Reading East constituency and (b) Berkshire in each year since 1997. [324827]
Annual statistics on business births, deaths and survival are available for 2002 onwards from the ONS release on Business Demography at
www.statistics.gov.uk
The table below contains the latest statistics available on business deaths for Reading East and Berkshire.
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Reading East 1— 1— 1— 528 523 496 507 Former County of Berkshire 3,770 4,212 4,121 3,778 3,621 3,609 3,570 Bracknell Forest UA 445 489 509 480 459 385 434 Reading UA 710 701 647 630 650 595 628 Slough UA 485 476 507 397 401 400 381 West Berkshire UA 700 810 830 722 706 751 762 Windsor and Maidenhead UA 775 989 848 811 708 788 760 1 Data not available Notes: 1. The former county of Berkshire is the area now covered by the Unitary Authorities of Bracknell Forest, Reading, Slough, West Berkshire, Windsor and Maidenhead and Wokingham, all created on 1 April 1998. 2. A small business is defined as an enterprise with less than 50 employment
Census
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.
Letter from Stephen Penneck, dated March 2010:
As the Director General for the Office for National Statistics (ONS) I have been asked to reply to your recent question asking what the schedule is for printing 2011 Census forms; and how many census forms are expected to be printed in each month from March 2010 to the date of the census. (323448)
Initial printing of the questionnaires is running from March 2010 to July 2010 and once this is complete a second process of overprinting will begin, during which the barcodes, unique identifiers and internet access codes will be printed onto each questionnaire.
Current expectations are that for the initial printing stage the numbers of questionnaires printed each month will be approximately:
Million March 2010 8 April 2010 9 May 2010 9 June 2010 10 July 2010 3
During August 2010 ONS will be undertaking testing processes and undertaking further quality assurance of the processing procedures.
Once the initial printing process is complete a second process of overprinting will begin, during which the barcodes, unique identifiers and internet access codes will be printed onto each questionnaire. This process will run from July 2010 until March 2011.
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.
Letter from Stephen Penneck, dated March 2010:
As the Director General for the Office for National Statistics (ONS) I have been asked to reply to your recent question asking what methodology will be used to count (a) people in immigration removal centres and (b) asylum seekers in the 2011 Census. (323453)
ONS will count those people in immigration removal centres in the same manner as it will count people in prison. ONS have liaised with the Ministry of Justice to develop procedures for enumerating prisoners, and are currently in discussion with the UK Borders Agency to extend this planning to cover immigration removal centres.
Specially trained field staff will visit such establishments and work with the management to ensure that census returns are made in respect of all inmates. Three prisons were included in the 2009 Census Rehearsal to ensure that plans for the 2011 Census are effective and practical.
Where asylum seekers are living in the community, Census field staff will not know whether or not they are asylum seekers, and the census questionnaire will not seek this information. Such people will be enumerated via a combination of special enumeration and general enumeration procedures dependent on their length of intended residence and their place of residence. Both language support and translation services will be available. In addition, field staff will have received specific training in how to best encourage people to complete a questionnaire and deal with refusals. There will also be a tailored publicity and communications strategy to accompany this.
(2) what the quantified discounted benefit was of the (a) 1991 and (b) 2011 Census exercises in real terms, adjusting for inflation and population growth.
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.
Letter from Stephen Penneck, dated March 2010:
As the Director General for the Office for National Statistics (ONS) I have been asked to reply to your recent questions asking, pursuant to the Answer to the Rt. Hon. Member for Horsham of 1 March 2010, Official Report, column 987W, on Census, what the quantified discounted benefit is of the additional questions contained in the 2011 Census, (323568); and pursuant to the Answer to the Rt. Hon. Member for Horsham of 1 March 2010, Official Report, column 987W on Census, what the quantified discounted benefit was of the (a) 1991 and (b) 2011 Census exercises in real terms, adjusting for inflation and population growth. (323569)
The quantified discounted benefit has only been calculated for the 2011 Census programme as a whole, specific figures for the net increase of 6 individual questions per person (with no increase in household questions), have not been calculated in financial terms. However, the uses of each question have been extensively explored and well documented. Reports into the development and the uses of the questions for the 2011 Census are available to download on the ONS website.
http://www.ons.gov.uk/census/2011-census/2011-census-questionnaire-content/question-and-content-recommendations-for-2011/index.html
As explained in the previous answer referred to in your question, the quantified discounted benefit for the 2011 Census has been estimated to be circa £750 million, however these benefits only relate to an estimated half of the uses of census data of which ONS is aware and so this figure is considered to be a very significant under-estimate.
This is the first time that quantified, discounted benefits have been calculated for a census therefore no figures exist for the 1991 or 2001 Censuses.
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.
Letter from Stephen Penneck, dated March 2010:
As the Director General for the Office for National Statistics (ONS) I have been asked to reply to your recent question asking over what geographic area the estimated £482 million expenditure on the 2011 Census is to be incurred. (324022)
This figure is the cost estimated by ONS to cover the undertaking of the 2011 Census in England and Wales.
Deaths: Malnutrition
(2) how many deaths of people resident in (a) private and (b) public care homes who had a malnutrition-related condition there were in each London borough in each year since 2000.
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.
Letter from Stephen Penneck, dated March 2010:
As Director General for the Office for National Statistics, I have been asked to reply to your recent questions asking:
1. How many deaths attributed to a malnutrition-related condition there were of people in each age group in each London borough in each year since 2000 (323786)
2. How many deaths of people resident in (a) private and (b) public care homes who had a malnutrition-related condition there were in each London borough in each year since 2000 (323787).
Internationally accepted guidance from the World Health Organisation requires only those conditions that contributed directly to death to be recorded on the death certificate. Medical practitioners and coroners are not supposed to record all of the diseases or conditions present at or before death. Whether a condition contributed is a matter for their clinical judgement.
There is no official definition of a ‘malnutrition-related condition’. The tables attached provide the number of deaths where:
1. Malnutrition was the underlying cause of death, by broad age group, in each London borough, in the years 2000 to 2008 (the latest year available) combined (Table 1).
2. Malnutrition or effects of hunger were mentioned anywhere on the death certificate, either as the underlying cause or as a contributory factor, by broad age group, in each London borough, in the years 2000 to 2008 combined (Table 2). Figures in Table 2 include those in Table 1.
3. Malnutrition or effects of hunger were mentioned anywhere on the death certificate, either as the underlying cause or as a contributory factor, in (a) private care homes and (b) public care homes in the London government office region, in each year from 2000 to 2008 (Table 3).
There were (a) two deaths in private care homes and (b) one death in a public care home where malnutrition was the underlying cause of death, in the London government office region, in the years 2000 to 2008 combined.1,2,3,4
More detailed breakdowns of the figures provided would include extremely small numbers of deaths in each London borough, age group or category, and might allow the identification of individuals. Consequently this level of detail has not been provided, in line with ONS policy on protecting confidentiality within birth and death statistics.5
1 Cause of death was defined using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes 260-269 (malnutrition) for the year 2000, and the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes E40-E46 (malnutrition) for 2001 onwards. Deaths were included where one of these causes was the underlying cause of death. The introduction of ICD-10 in 2001 means that the numbers of deaths from malnutrition before 2001 are not completely comparable with later years.
2 ‘Private care home’ includes non-NHS private nursing homes and private residential homes; ‘Public care home’ includes NHS private nursing homes and local authority residential homes.
3 Figures are based on boundaries as of 2010.
4 Figures are for deaths registered in the calendar years 2000-08 combined.
5 The ONS policy on protecting confidentiality within birth and death statistics is available on the National Statistics website at:
http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_health/ConfidentialityBirth&Death.pdf
Deaths(persons) London borough 0-44 45-74 75+ Barking and Dagenham 0 1 1 Barnet 1 0 0 Bexley 0 0 0 Brent 1 0 2 Bromley 0 1 1 Camden 0 0 1 City of London 0 0 0 Croydon 0 0 1 Ealing 1 1 0 Enfield 1 1 0 Greenwich 0 0 0 Hackney 0 2 2 Hammersmith and Fulham 0 0 2 Haringey 0 0 1 Harrow 0 0 0 Havering 0 0 1 Hillingdon 0 2 2 Hounslow 1 1 2 Islington 0 0 0 Kensington and Chelsea 0 1 0 Kingston upon Thames 1 0 1 Lambeth 0 2 6 Lewisham 1 0 0 Merton 0 1 1 Newham 0 2 0 Redbridge 1 0 0 Richmond upon Thames 0 0 0 Southwark 0 1 1 Sutton 0 1 1 Tower Hamlets 1 0 3 Waltham Forest 0 1 1 Wandsworth 0 2 2 Westminster 0 2 1 1 Cause of death was defined using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes 260-269 (malnutrition) for the year 2000, and the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes E40-E46 (malnutrition) for 2001 onwards. Deaths were included where these codes were the underlying cause of death. The introduction of ICD-10 in 2001 means that the number of deaths from malnutrition before 2001 is not completely comparable with later years. 2 Figures based on boundaries as of 2010. 3 Figures are for deaths registered in the calendar years 2000-08 combined.
Deaths (persons) London borough 0-44 45-74 75+ Barking and Dagenham 0 2 2 Barnet 2 3 4 Bexley 0 3 2 Brent 1 3 3 Bromley 1 2 5 Camden 0 5 3 City of London 0 0 1 Croydon 1 1 3 Ealing 3 6 4 Enfield 1 2 3 Greenwich 1 1 2 Hackney 0 3 8 Hammersmith and Fulham 0 5 2 Haringey 1 0 1 Harrow 0 1 1 Havering 0 1 2 Hillingdon 0 2 7 Hounslow 1 1 4 Islington 0 3 2 Kensington and Chelsea 2 3 2 Kingston upon Thames 1 0 1 Lambeth 1 9 10 Lewisham 3 0 1 Merton 0 2 3 Newham 1 4 1 Redbridge 2 1 2 Richmond upon Thames 0 0 2 Southwark 1 5 4 Sutton 0 1 4 Tower Hamlets 1 3 7 Waltham Forest 0 2 1 Wandsworth 0 6 9 Westminster 3 6 8 1 Cause of death was defined using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes 260-269 (malnutrition) and E904.1 (effects of hunger) for the year 2000, and the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes E40-E46 (malnutrition) and T73.0 (effects of hunger) for 2001 onwards. Deaths were included where one or more of these causes was mentioned anywhere on the death certificate. The introduction of ICD-10 in 2001 means that the numbers of deaths from these causes before 2001 are not completely comparable with later years. 2 Figures based on boundaries as of 2010. 3 Figures arc for deaths registered in the calendar years 2000-08 combined.
Deaths (persons) Private care home Public care home 2000 1 2 2001 2 0 2002 0 0 2003 2 0 2004 1 0 2005 2 0 2006 2 0 2007 1 0 2008 1 0 1 Cause of death was defined using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes 260-269 (malnutrition) and E904.1 (effects of hunger) for the year 2000, and the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes E40-E46 (malnutrition) and T73.0 (effects of hunger) for 2001 onwards. Deaths were included where one or more of these causes was mentioned anywhere on the death certificate. The introduction of ICD-10 in 2001 means that the numbers of deaths from this cause before 2001 are not completely comparable with later years. 2 ‘Private care home’ includes non-NHS private nursing homes and private residential homes; ‘Public care home’ includes NHS private nursing homes and local authority residential homes. 3 Figures are based on boundaries as of 2010. 4 Figures are for deaths registered in each calendar year.
Employment
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.
Letter from Stephen Penneck, dated March 2010:
As Director General for the Office for National Statistics, I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question concerning the re-employment rate for (a) public and (b) private sector workers whose jobs have been offshored. (323582)
The requested information is not available.
Government Departments: Data Sharing
I have been asked to reply.
As part of ‘Putting the frontline first: Smarter Government’, the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) has been tasked with making it easier for public services to join up by establishing a set of common protocols and reviewing the legal framework that governs the way in which public services exchange information. MOJ is delivering on this objective through a variety of work streams, including:
revising the departmental 2003 legal guidance on data sharing;
developing Government guidance on privacy impact assessments;
liaising with the Information Commissioner's Office on its statutory code of practice on data sharing;
consulting other Government Departments on the further guidance and information sharing protocols they need; and
exploring in more detail the barriers to the exchange of information between public services, and how legislative and non-legislative options might reduce these barriers and ensure proportionate and lawful information exchange can take place to improve public services, while ensuring that individuals' personal data is protected.
Government Departments: Publications
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.
Letter from Sir Michael Scholar KCB, dated 22 March 2010:
As Chair of the UK Statistics Authority, I am replying to your recent parliamentary question asking on what occasions the UK Statistics Authority has written to Government departments and agencies on their presentation of statistics; and what the subject was of each such communication [323566].
Correspondence between the Chair of the UK Statistics Authority and Government Departments, agencies, and public bodies about the presentation of statistics and other matters is published on the Statistics Authority website at:
http://www.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/reports---correspondence /correspondence/index.html
Private Sector: Manpower
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.
Letter from Stephen Penneck, dated March 2010:
As Director General for the Office for National Statistics, 1 have been asked to reply to your Parliamentary Question asking how many UK-born working age people were employed in the private sector (a) in each year since 1997 and (b) on the most recent date for which data are available. (324195)
The available information is provided in the attached table. The estimates are derived from the Labour Force Survey (LFS). The distinction between public and private sector is based on respondents' views about the organisation for which they work.
As with any sample survey, the estimates provided are subject to a margin of uncertainty.
Thousand Level 1997 18,354 1998 18,635 1999 18,816 2000 18,781 2001 18,935 2002 18,948 2003 18.877 2004 18,785 2005 18,622 2006 18,663 2007 18,617 2008 18,206 20092 *17,710 1 It should be noted that the private sector estimates are based on survey respondents' views about the organisation for which they work and therefore do not correspond to the National Accounts definition used to define Public and Private Sector Employment estimates. 2 Coefficients of Variation have been calculated as an indication of the quality of the estimates, as described below: Guide to Quality: The Coefficient of Variation (CV) indicates the quality of an estimate, the smaller the CV value the higher the quality. The true value is likely to lie within +/- twice the CV - for example, for an estimate of 200 with a CV of 5% we would expect the population total to be within the range 180-220. Key Coefficient of Variation (CV)(%) Statistical Robustness * 0 ≤ CV< 5 Estimates are considered precise ** 5 ≤ CV < 10 Estimates are considered reasonably precise *** 10 ≤ CV < 20 Estimates are considered acceptable **** CV ≥ 20 Estimates are considered too unreliable for practical purposes Note: It should be noted that the above estimates exclude people in most types of communal establishment (e.g. hotels, boarding houses, hostels, mobile home sites etc.) Source: Labour Force Survey
Home Department
Asylum
(2) how many people are awaiting a decision on an application for asylum.
Information is published quarterly on the number of asylum applicants awaiting an initial decision and as at the end of December 2009, the latest published period, the total was 6,900 (excluding dependents). This figure is derived from the cumulative effect of applications received, decisions made, and applications withdrawn, applied to the total outstanding cases figure produced from the manual count at the end of August 2001. Figures are rounded to nearest 100. The original manual count was a total figure only and consequently the figure cannot be broken down by nationality, gender and age.
Information on asylum applications is published annually in the Control of Immigration: Statistics United Kingdom bulletin and on a quarterly basis in the Control of Immigration Quarterly Statistical Summary.
These publications are available from the Library of the House and from the Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate website at:
www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/immigration-asylum-stats.html
The UK Border Agency has just over 34,700 cases in NAM (New Asylum Model) that have not been concluded as at the end of February 2010, the majority of which are awaiting removal. These cases are being actively managed. Figure is rounded to the nearest 100.
This data does not constitute part of National Statistics as they are based on internal management information. The information has not been quality assured under National Statistics protocols and should be treated as provisional and subject to change.
Information on asylum applications is published annually in the Control of Immigration: Statistics United Kingdom bulletin and on a quarterly basis in the Control of Immigration Quarterly Statistical Summary.
These publications are available from the Library of the House and from the Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate website at:
www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/immigration-asylum-stats.html
The UK Border Agency has anticipated the need to increase resources in line with its targets and has recruited sufficient case owners in each of its regions to continue to improve the time taken to reach an initial decision.
The UK Border Agency's regions are now fully responsible for the development of the required flexible work force, and will be investing in case owner development and managing regionally-based recruitment campaigns as necessary so that staff can carry out a variety of functions and respond to fluctuations in intake.
Asylum: Scotland
All cases being dealt with by the Case Resolution Directorate were lodged prior to March 2007. Therefore, there are no applications submitted post-2007 that are being dealt with in the Legacy programme.
Departmental Energy
On 27 March 2010 the Home Office will again support Earth Hour. Non-operational lights will be turned off at our major locations. Last year my Department ran a ‘switch it off’ campaign to coincide with the Earth Hour to encourage staff to switch off lights, computers and printers at work and to participate at home as well. Across several of our major locations the lights were turned off and as a result 2,491 kilogrammes of carbon dioxide was saved compared to a preceding period. We plan to take part in the event in the same way this year.
Departmental Temporary Employment
The Home Department sources temporary staff of all kinds from a range of companies from small-scale, niche suppliers to large companies with national coverage. Since such individuals are not Home Office employees, the amalgamated information sought is not held centrally and attempting to assemble it could not be undertaken without incurring disproportionate cost. In terms of monetary values, the Department is able to provide the following information on its expenditure in the last three years through contracts with some of its leading suppliers of temporary staff in those years. The spend in this category is being realigned and is currently reckoned at some £13 million per annum, which in 2008-09 represented less than 1 per cent. of total expenditure by the Home Office and its agencies of £1,749 million. All figures provided are subject to accounting adjustment and amendment.
Supplier 2009-10 2008-09 2007-08 Hays Executive 3.4 2.1 1.4 Manpower Inc. 3.5 2.0 1.0 OGC/Buying Solutions 3.3 1.1 0.1 MPS Group Inc. 1.9 1.5 0.9 TAC Technology Project Services 2.5 0.8 0.1 Office Angels Ltd. 1.4 1.1 0.2 James Reed and Partners plc 1.1 0.8 0.4 Methods Holdings Ltd. 0.8 1.1 0.3 Hudson Highland Group Inc. 0.7 0.7 0.8 Parity Group plc 1.0 1.0 n/a Interquest Group plc 0.7 0.7 0.7
Departmental Travel
Contracted expenditure by the Home Department, inclusive of the UKBA and the Criminal Records Bureau, on first class rail travel by (a) Ministers and (b) staff of each grade for the period 1 February 2009 to 10 January 2010 is as follows:
£ Home Office/UKBA CRB Ministers 16,570 — Staff grades: Senior Civil Service (SCS) 214,145 39,917 Grade 6 342,378 17,682 Grade 7 781,329 50,761 SEO 701,693 66,579 HEO 137,890 21,796 HEOD 5,065 — HMI 13,940 — CIO 3,535 — EO 63,595 6,781 IO 3,709 — PS 2,642 — AO 25,666 2,444 AA 1,152 376 Grade unspecified 81,979 9,332
Contracted expenditure by the Home Department, inclusive of the UKBA and the Criminal Records Bureau on first class air travel by (a) Ministers and (b) staff of each grade for the period 1 February 2009 to 10 January 2010 is as follows:
£ Home Office/UKBA CRB Minister 348 0 Staff grades: SEO 351 0 HEO 348 0 Note: In a small number of journeys staff were upgraded to first class at no additional cost.
Total expenditure by the Identity and Passport Service on first class rail travel by all staff for the period January to December 2009 was £873,042. A breakdown of expenditure by grade could be made available only at disproportionate cost. There was no expenditure on first class air travel by the Identity and Passport Service.
Detention Centres
(2) how many incidents of self-harm by (a) women, (b) men, (c) children under 18 years old and (d) children under 10 years old were recorded at each immigration removal centre in the UK in each of the last six years.
We do not record centrally every incident of self harm, only those incidents where medical treatment was required. The figures represent the total in each financial year for when data was available for Immigration Removal Centres.
Number 2009-101 2145 2008-09 174 2007-08 163 2006-07 197 2005-06 232 1 Includes figures for Brook House Immigration Removal Centre which opened towards the end of March 2009. 2 As at the end of January
There are over 2,500 people in removal centres at any one time. In 2009, we published for the first time, data on the number of people entering detention. In 2009-10 to the end of January, 20,805 people came into immigration removal centres.
This data is normally used for management information only and is not subject to the detailed checks that apply for national statistics publications. It is provisional and subject to change. Published national statistics on the number of adults and children held in detention solely under Immigration Act powers on a snapshot basis are published quarterly and are available from the Library of the House and from the Home Office's Research, Development and Statistics website at:
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/immigration-asylum-stats.html
We take the safety of those in our care very seriously, and operate a system called Assessment Care in Detention and Teamwork (ACDT) to identify and help those who are at risk of suicide or self harm. Notices in various languages are displayed around Centres setting out that, where there is a concern about a fellow detainee, this should be brought to the attention of a member of staff.
There has been inaccurate reporting in the media of a hunger strike at Yarl's Wood immigration removal centre. While a small number of detainees were refusing formal meals from the canteen, we are aware that they have accessed food from the centre's shop, vending machines and social visitors. They were all also drinking.
We only record information on detainees who have missed four consecutive meals, excluding breakfast. Such detainees miss meals for a number of reasons, including fasting due to their religious faith. We do not record the number who state they are refusing food in protest at a particular issue.
All those who miss meals are monitored closely by the centre, including health care, where they will receive advice on diet and welfare issues.
The UK Border Agency and the Centre management engage closely with such detainees to understand the reason for them missing meals and to seek to resolve any underlying problems.
Entry Clearances: Kosovo
Since 2008, passports issued by the competent Kosovan authorities have been accepted for travel to the United Kingdom (UK). These documents are generally issued by the Kosovan authorities in Pristina. Serbian passports, which are issued by the competent Serbian authorities, are also accepted for travel to the UK.
Both Serbian and Kosovan nationals require visas before travelling to the UK and are subject to immigration control on arrival.
The UK Border Agency is unable to comment on whether Kosovan citizens of Serbian extraction would qualify for a Serbian national passport. This would be a matter for the Serbian authorities.
Entry Clearances: Overseas Students
These changes came into force on 3 March and we continually monitor Tier 4 to ensure its effectiveness. Our policies are carefully balanced to protect the integrity of the UK's immigration system while safeguarding the ability for genuine international students who wish to study here.
Identity Cards
[holding answer 23 March 2010]: There have been no such discussions. However, identity cards and the National Identity Register should provide a number of opportunities to deliver public services more efficiently and effectively in the future.
Identity Cards: Fees and Charges
The Identity and Passport Service (IPS) has collected approximately £115,000 in identity card fees to the end of February 2010.
The IPS Annual Report and Accounts for 2009-10 will include audited disclosure of operational identity card income and expenditure.
From 2012, the Identity and Passport Service will extend the rollout of identity cards across the United Kingdom, alongside the introduction of second generation biometric passports, but there are no formal plans to introduce a new model of identity card.
The fee for an identity card is £30 in 2009 and 2010, as set out in the March 2008 National Identity Scheme Delivery Plan. The level of fees that will apply in the future has not been finalised and will depend on the future fee strategy for passports and identity cards.
Immigration
[holding answer 22 February 2010]: There is a range of categories under which a child may arrive in the United Kingdom and who may stay into adulthood. The specific criteria and application consideration will vary for each respective category and it is therefore not possible to be consistent across the board.
[holding answer 15 March 2010]: No cases are currently awaiting allocation to a case owner. On 17 December 2007 every Case Resolution Directorate (CRD) case was allocated to a case owner.
Immigration: Detainees
[holding answer 22 March 2010]: The information requested is not recorded centrally and could be provided only by examination of individual records which would be at disproportionate cost.
However, each immigration removal centre provides on-site medical care 24 hours a day. All detainees are seen by a nurse for a health screening within two hours of arrival at a centre and are given an appointment to see the GP within 24 hours. GPs see detainees earlier if required. Thereafter, they access health care on demand, subject to a triage service similar to that found in GP surgeries in the community.
Secondary treatment is provided by the local primary care trust by way of a referral from healthcare.
[holding answer 22 March 2010]: The data requested are not recorded at immigration removal centres and could be provided by the UK Border Agency by only examination of individual security records at each centre at disproportionate cost.
The police might be called for a variety of different reasons, including where an offence may have been committed such as an attempt to import drugs into a centre, or to assist with managing disturbances.
Members: Correspondence
[holding answer 18 March 2010]: The reply letter was sent out on 18 March 2010.
Ministers’ Private Offices
The expenditure incurred on entertainment, travel and overnight subsistence in Private Office for the last two financial years is as follows. Information relating to years before this is not held centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
2008-09
Entertainment: £2,719
Travel: £111,269
Overnight subsistence: £5,192
2009-10 (to February)
Entertainment: £727
Travel: £46,260
Overnight subsistence: £13,570
The term ‘entertainment’ encompasses working lunches, tea and coffees and sandwiches for all meetings attended by outside stakeholders.
National Identity Register
[holding answer 23 March 2010]: Information cannot be provided to a local authority from the national identity register without further secondary legislation and there are no current plans to do so for the administration of concessionary bus passes. However, an individual may choose to show an identity card to a local authority or to anyone else to help verify their identity, including age.
Police: Finance
The Home Office does not allocate specific grants for recruitment of police officers and since 2008-09 the former specific grant for the Initial Police Learning Development Programme has been absorbed into the main police grant at the level prevailing in 2007-08 of £16.2 million. Expenditure on recruitment and training is a matter for each individual police force.
Centrex prior to its abolition, and since 1 April 2007, the National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA), through National Assessment Centres has managed the recruitment of police officers funded from its overall grant in aid from the Home Office.
The information is as follows:
(a) The information available can be found in the following table:
£ million 2009-10 231.8 Note: This figure comprises the Home Office Police Grant and certain Specific Grants and Capital Provision, and also the Revenue Support Grant and National Non-Domestic Rates (both provided by the Department for Communities and Local Government).
(b) The Government do not distribute grant to police authorities on a per capita basis. The police funding formula used includes data relating to demographic and social characteristics to reflect the needs of each police authority. Police grants allocated by the Department for Communities and Local Government and the Welsh Assembly Government also take into account the relative tax base of each police authority. Grant allocations are stabilised by damping to limit year-on-year variations.
The information requested is as follows:
(a) The information available can be found in the following table.
£ billion 2009-10 10.1 Note: This figure comprises the Home Office Police Grant and certain Specific Grants and Capital Provision, and also the Revenue Support Grant and National Non-Domestic Rates (both provided by the Department for Communities and Local Government).
(b) The Government do not distribute grant to police authorities on a per capita basis. The police funding formula used includes data relating to demographic and social characteristics to reflect the needs of each police authority. Police grants allocated by the Department for Communities and Local Government and the Welsh Assembly Government also take into account the relative tax base of each police authority. Grant allocations are stabilised by damping to limit year-on-year variations.
The information is as follows:
(a) The information available can be found in the following table.
£ million 1995-96 126.6 Note: This figure comprises the Home Office Police Grant and certain Specific Grants and Capital Provision, and also the Revenue Support Grant and National Non-Domestic Rates (both provided by the Department for Communities and Local Government).
(b) The Government do not distribute grant to police authorities on a per capita basis. The police funding formula used includes data relating to demographic and social characteristics to reflect the needs of each police authority. Police grants allocated by the Department for Communities and Local Government and the Welsh Assembly Government also take into account the relative tax base of each police authority. Grant allocations are stabilised by damping to limit year-on-year variations.
The information requested is as follows:
(a) The information available can be found in the following table.
£ billion 1995-96 5.5 Note: This figure comprises the Home Office Police grant and certain specific grants and capital provision, and also the Revenue support grant and national non-domestic rates (both provided by the Department for Communities and Local Government).
(b) The Government do not distribute grant to police authorities on a per capita basis. The police funding formula used includes data relating to demographic and social characteristics to reflect the needs of each police authority. Police grants allocated by the Department for Communities and Local Government and the Welsh Assembly Government also take into account the relative tax base of each police authority. Grant allocations are stabilised by damping to limit year-on-year variations.
Powers of Entry
(2) which (a) new and (b) amended powers of entry created since October 2007 were not subject to formal consultation with his Department.
The statutory provisions that are now in force and have been subject to referral to my Department since October 2007 are in the following table.
I am aware of the following three statutory instruments that contain powers of entry were not referred to my department for consideration.
The Official Feed and Food Controls (England) Regulations 2009 (2009/3255) which revoke the 2007 Regulations and re-enacts the same powers of entry was not referred for consideration but is in accordance with the guidance. The powers of entry in the 2009 regulations are substantially unchanged from those in the original 2005 Regulations which were considered by my Department.
Also the Poultry Compartments (England) Order (2010/108) was not referred for consideration but is in accordance with the guidance.
The Merchant Shipping and Fishing Vessels (Health and Safety at Work) (Biological Agents) Regulations (2010/323) was not referred for consideration but is in accordance with the guidance. The powers of entry used are from the Merchant Shipping Act 1995 which were considered by my Department.
Any power of entry is granted by statute and therefore subject to parliamentary scrutiny of achieving the balance between sufficient powers to enforce and adequate protections for the individual.
The Home Department was consulted in respect of the power of entry contained in the draft Environmental Civil Sanctions (England) Order 2010 which is not yet in force.
Year Statute Department responsible Number of powers 1 2006 Childcare Act 2006 (as amended by Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009) Part 3A Inspection of Children Centres. s.98D: Inspection of Children Centres powers of entry without warrant. s.98F: Power of constable to assist in exercise of power of entry under a warrant. DCSF 2 2 2008 Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Repeals and replaces powers of entry etc. under the Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Act 2003) s.62-65: Powers of person authorised by Care Quality Commission to enter and inspect regulated premises. DoH 1 3 2009 Banking Act 2009—Enforcement of inter-bank payment system s.194: JP may issue warrant to authorised BoE inspector appointed under s.193 or constable to enter and search premises/part of premises where inter-bank payment system is managed or operated. HMT 1 4 2009 Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 Part eight, Chapter two Common enforcement powers s.246: Power of enforcement officer to board and inspect vessels and marine installations. s.247: Power of enforcement officer to enter and inspect premises for purposes of exercising functions. s.248: Power of enforcement officer to enter and inspect vehicles purposes of exercising functions. s.249/Schedule 17: Provides for issue of warrant to authorise enforcement officer to enter a dwelling. (Believed these provisions may replace one or more powers in marine/fishery protection/regulation type legislation) DEFRA 4
No. Year SI no. Authority Title Department No. of powers 1 2008 2347 European Communities Act 1972 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2008/uksi_20082347_en_1 Sea Fishing (Recovery Measures) Order 2008 [2008/2347] Reg 13 Powers of British sea-fishery officers in relation to fishing boats Reg 14 Powers of British sea-fishery officers on land Reg 15 Warrant to enter premises DEFRA 3 2 2008 2795 European Communities Act 1972 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2008/uksi_20082795_en_1 Cat and Dog Fur (Control of Import, Export and Placing on the Market) Regulations 2008 [2008/2795] Reg 3: Powers of investigation and enforcement BIS 1 3 2009 1899 European Communities Act 1972 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/uksi_20091899_en_1 Motor Vehicles (Replacement Catalytic Converters and Pollution Control Devices) Regulations 2009 [2009/1899] Reg 9(2) and Schedule Para. 5: Powers of search etc. (2): Power of authorised enforcement officer to enter premises without warrant—not dwellings (5): JP may issue warrant authorising authorised enforcement officer to enter premises DfT 2 4 2009 261 European Communities Act 1972 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/uksi_20090261_en_1 Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases Regulations 2009 [2009/261] (Revoke and remake with amendments the Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases Regulations 2008/41) Reg 46: Powers of authorised persons to enforce regulations DEFRA 1 5 2009 2048 European Communities Act 1972 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/pdf/uksi_20092048_en.pdf Port Security Regulations 2009 [2009/2048] Reg. 25: Powers of a constable, port security officers and others to enter and search controlled buildings in designated ports DfT 1 6 2009 463 European Communities Act 1972 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/uksi_20090463_en_5 Aquatic Animal Health (England and Wales) Regulations 2009 [2009/463] Reg. 32(2): Entry and inspection of land and premises w/o warrant Reg. 32(3): Warrant to enter dwelling DEFRA 2 7 2009 360 European Communities Act 1972 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/legislation/wales/wsi2009/wsi_20090360_en_1 European Fisheries Fund (Grants) (Wales) Regulations 2009 [2009/360] Reg 12: Powers of authorised officers NAFW 1 8 2009 842 European Communities Act 1972 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/uksi_20090842_en_4#pt5-l1g26 Organic Products Regulations [2009/842] (revoke and replace Organic Products Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/1604) Reg 23: Powers of entry—authorised officers Reg 24: Powers after entry DEFRA 1 9 2009 209 European Communities Act 1972 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/uksi_20090209_en_8 Payment Services Regulations 2009 [2009/209] Reg 83: Entry, inspection without a warrant etc—FSA officer HMT 1 10 2009 717 European Communities Act 1972 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/uksi_20090717_en_7#pt6-pb1-l1g34 Road Vehicles (Approval) Regulations 2009 [2009/717] Reg 34: Powers of entry—authorised person DfT 1 11 2009 216 European Communities Act 1972 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/uksi_20090216_en_1 Ozone-Depleting Substances (Qualifications) Regulations 2009 [2009/216] (revoke and replace, with amendments, Ozone Depleting Substances (Qualifications) Regulations 2006 (S.I. 2006/1510) Reg 8: Powers of an authorised person DEFRA 1 12 2009 2194 European Communities Act 1972 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/uksi_20092194_en_1 Motor Vehicles (Refilling of Air Conditioning Systems by Service Providers) Regulations [2009/2194] Reg eight: Powers of search etc. (2): Power of authorised enforcement officer to enter premises without warrant—not dwellings (4): JP may issue warrant authorising authorised enforcement officer to enter premises DfT 2 13 2009 1361 European Communities Act 1972 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/uksi_20091361_en_1 Marketing of Fresh Horticultural Produce Regulations 2009 [2009/1361] Reg. 7(1) Power of authorised officer to enter without warrant to enforce Regs Reg 7(4): Entry on warrant DEFRA 2 14 2009 1551 European Communities Act 1972 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/legislation/wales/wsi2009/wsi_20091551_en_1 Marketing of Fresh Horticultural Produce (Wales) Regulations 2009 [2009/1551] W151 Reg. 7(1) Power of authorised officer to enter without warrant to enforce Regs Reg 7(4): Entry on warrant NAFW 2 15 2008 3252 European Communities Act 1972 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2008/pdf/uksi_20083252_en.pdf Beef and Veal Labelling Regulations 2008 [2008/3252] Reg 6(1) Entry to inspect w/o warrant Reg 6(3) Entry on warrant Revokes Beef Labelling (Enforcement) (England) Regulations 2000 [2000/3047] DEFRA 2 16 2009 1850 European Communities Act 1972 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/pdf/uksi_20091850_en.pdf Sea Fishing (Landing and Weighing of Herring, Mackerel and Horse Mackerel) Order 2009 [2009/1850] Reg 11 Powers of British sea-fishery officers in relation to fishing boats Reg 12 Powers of British sea-fishery officers on land Reg 13 Warrant to enter premises DEFRA 3
Terrorism: Stop and Search
Information on stop and search section 44 is collected centrally by the Home Office and provisional data are published quarterly in the official statistics publication ‘Operation of police powers under the Terrorism Act 2000 and subsequent legislation: arrest, outcomes and stops and searches, Great Britain.’ The most recent publication (released February 2010) provides an update to 30 September 2009 and shows that of the 200,444 people stopped and searched under section 44 in the year ending 30 September 2009, 63,535 individuals self-identified as from a Black, Asian, Chinese/Other or of mixed ethnicity background. This equates to 32 per cent. of the total recorded for this period.
The data are published quarterly and the latest update can be found here:
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs10/hosb0410.pdf
This data are considered provisional and full quality assured data are published by the Home Office in the annual statistical report 'Police Powers and Procedure,' further ethnicity breakdown will be available in the Ministry of Justice annual report on 'Statistics on Race and the Criminal Justice System.'
UK Border Agency: Complaints
The UK Border Agency does not hold central information to the level of detail asked for in this question. However, data are available relating to all types of complaints about the service that the agency provides. In 2008 there were 10,835 such complaints received by the agency and in 2009 there were 12,038.
UK Border Agency: Expenditure
The amount that the UK Border Agency and its predecessor spent on (a) advertising, (b) refreshments and (c) stationery in each year since 2005, is shown in the following table. Advertising is used by the agency when recruiting staff and to promote compliance with immigration and customs regulations.
£ Advertising Refreshments Stationery 2005-06 0 298,320 4,139,851 2006-07 0 287,712 5,001,987 2007-08 16,049 246,391 4,428,372 2008-09 0 204,576 2,939,244 Notes: 1. Stationery: The figures for refreshments and stationary were drawn from cost code categories in the computerised general ledger to which invoices are posted. The costs will include a wide range of items form basic stationary to specialist forms. 2. Advertising: Recruitment advertising has not been included as it is not conducted centrally and hence spend could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. Most customer/public facing advertising undertaken by the UK Border Agency during the period covered was undertaken on behalf of the Home Office or other Departments and is therefore accounted for within the advertising spend of those Departments, not the agency.
Young Offenders: Greater London
(2) how many (a) reparation, (b) action plan, (c) attendance centre, (d) curfew orders with conditions and (e) supervision orders were (i) issued for each reason to and (ii) breached by offenders aged (A) 12, (B) 13, (C) 14, (D) 15, (E) 16, (F) 17, (G) 18 and (H) 19 years old in each London borough in each year since 2002.
I have been asked to reply.
The available information is provided in the following table.
Data for 2009 will be available when Sentencing Statistics 2009 is published later this year.
The Court Proceedings database does not have data by boroughs. The information provided is for the London criminal justice area.
Due to data quality issues we are unable to provide information on breaches from the Courts Proceeding database. Work is currently under way to resolve this.
The Courts Proceeding database does not record information on reasons why these orders have been issued, other than the offence committed.
The figures referred to in the response relate to stand alone community sentences only. Requirements similar to those of the stand alone orders which have been given as part of the generic Community Order are not included. The Community Order, brought in by the Criminal Justice Act 2003 is available for offenders 18 and over and whose offence was committed from April 2005.
The community rehabilitation order and the standalone curfew order were replaced by the community order under the Criminal Justice Act 2003, from April 2005 for offenders over 18.
Community rehabilitation orders do not apply to offenders aged under 16.
Action plan order and reparation orders apply for offenders aged under 18.
Types of community sentences Age 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Community Rehabilitation Order 12 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 13 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 14 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 15 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 16 61 29 64 62 39 58 73 17 237 183 173 207 144 185 216 18 390 291 251 132 23 31 20 19 392 293 223 142 10 0 0 Reparation Order 12 5 6 2 3 6 3 0 13 32 9 8 9 19 20 14 14 57 24 28 23 38 36 34 15 106 65 48 57 76 90 73 16 104 69 68 55 102 99 76 17 106 56 56 55 72 68 60 18 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 19 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Action Plan Order 12 16 12 9 7 10 9 14 13 56 27 28 20 25 39 18 14 130 71 71 64 79 74 62 15 209 131 113 116 141 115 104 16 192 129 134 141 145 132 116 17 181 111 91 118 131 127 107 18 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 19 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Attendance Centre 12 5 1 2 1 3 4 1 13 13 8 11 6 6 6 7 14 51 26 26 14 11 32 21 15 89 45 50 52 42 68 47 16 84 59 64 53 54 69 63 17 77 60 55 49 67 82 66 18 43 31 25 27 32 22 25 19 27 20 19 15 22 15 13 Curfew Order 12 6 5 3 1 4 6 9 13 20 13 18 15 11 29 41 14 49 46 62 37 46 70 113 15 76 91 113 113 83 158 193 16 72 87 130 101 109 161 212 17 69 63 94 88 76 119 225 18 37 46 65 62 23 21 30 19 32 61 61 49 19 15 23 n/a = Not applicable Notes: Community rehabilitation orders do not apply to offenders under 16. Reparation orders only apply to those aged 17 or under. These figures have been drawn from administrative data systems. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system. This data has been taken from the Ministry of Justice Court Proceedings database. This data is presented on the principal offence basis. Where an offender has been sentenced for more than one offence the principal offence is the one for which the heaviest sentence was imposed. Where the same sentence has been imposed for two or more offences the principal offence is the one for which the statutory maximum is most severe. Sentences at the Crown court are categorised according to the police force that prosecuted the offence including those sentences that may be given at a court outside the prosecuting police force’s area. The statistics are presented by criminal justice area. Police force areas correspond to criminal justice areas except for the Metropolitan and City of London Police, which are combined to form the London criminal justice area. Prosecutions brought by agencies other than the police are categorised according to the criminal justice area of the sentencing court. In the case of sentences at magistrates courts, a change was made to the categorisation by area as part of the rollout of the Libra case management system in magistrates courts during 2008. Sentences given at courts using the Libra system are categorised according to the criminal justice area of the court while sentences given at courts not yet using the Libra system are categorised in the same way as at the Crown court. By the end of 2008, all magistrates courts were using Libra. This change will have almost no impact on the categorisation by area; only around 0.01 per cent. of sentences at magistrates courts could have been affected in 2007 and 2008. Police forces do not prosecute minor offences (those that are sentenced at magistrates courts) in courts outside their areas. The figures referred to in the response relate to stand alone community sentences only. Requirements similar to those of the stand alone orders which have been given as part of the generic community order are not included. The Community Order, which was brought in by the Criminal Justice Act 2003 is available for offenders 18 and over and whose offence was committed from April 2005.
I have been asked to reply.
The available information is provided in the following table.
Data for 2009 will be available when Sentencing Statistics 2009 is published later this year.
The Courts Proceeding database does not record information on reasons why these orders have been issued, other than the offence committed.
Due to data quality issues we are unable to provide information on breaches. Work is currently under way to resolve this.
The figures referred to in the response relate to stand alone community sentences only. Requirements similar to those of the stand alone orders which have been given as part of the generic community order are not included. The community order, which was brought in by the Criminal Justice Act 2003 is available for offenders 18 and over and whose offence was committed from April 2005.
The drug treatment and testing order was replaced by the drug rehabilitation requirement of the community order under the Criminal Justice Act 2003, from April 2005, for offenders aged over 18.
Age 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 12 — — — — — — — 13 — — — — — — — 14 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 16 20 30 14 11 5 4 1 17 49 38 33 25 7 6 2 18 92 104 142 54 6 3 1 19 182 183 202 108 6 0 0 1 Drug treatment and testing orders are not available for offenders aged under 16. These records are likely to be data errors, resulting from incorrect recording of age or disposal. Notes: 1. These figures have been drawn from administrative data systems. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system. 2. This data has been taken from the Ministry of Justice Court Proceedings database. This data is presented on the principal offence basis. Where an offender has been sentenced for more than one offence the principal offence is the one for which the heaviest sentence was imposed. Where the same sentence has been imposed for two or more offences the principal offence is the one for which the statutory maximum is most severe. 3. The figures referred to in the response relate to stand alone community sentences only. Requirements similar to those of the stand alone orders which have been given as part of the generic community order are not included. The Community Order, which was brought in by the Criminal Justice Act 2003 is available for offenders 18 and over and whose offence was committed from April 2005.
I have been asked to reply.
The Youth Justice Board collects figures on the number and type of staff working at each Youth Offending Team at the beginning of each financial year. The table shows information from 2004-05 as this was the first year in which this data was collected. The figures include vacant posts.
The table shows the figures on (a) volunteers, (b) (i) full-time and (ii) part-time practitioners, (c) sessional staff, (d) administration staff, (e) managers, (f) student and trainees and (g) others working at each Youth Offending Team at the beginning of each financial year.
a b (i) b (ii) c d e f g Total 2008-09 Barking and Dagenham 19 33 0 0 5 5 0 0 62 Barnet 19 18 10 0 1 7 1 0 56 Bexley 23 11 4 1 2 2 0 0 43 Brent 0 25 2 0 7 8 1 0 43 Bromley 24 26 3 8 7 5 0 0 73 Camden 0 26 13 0 8 7 0 0 54 Croydon 51 34 7 14 9 12 0 0 127 Ealing 0 23 6 3 6 10 0 0 48 Enfield 28 38 2 0 7 5 0 0 80 Greenwich 0 22 9 0 9 9 0 0 49 Hackney 0 64 5 0 14 9 0 0 92 Hammersmith and Fulham 50 34 2 4 8 6 2 0 106 Haringey 30 42 7 7 19 5 0 0 110 Harrow 40 17 8 12 7 4 1 0 89 Havering 37 19 6 10 5 3 0 0 80 Hillingdon 28 26 0 14 6 5 2 0 81 Hounslow 19 21 6 26 7 6 0 0 85 Islington 27 30 0 2 7 4 0 0 70 Kensington and Chelsea 24 23 4 1 3 5 0 0 60 Kingston-upon-Thames 0 9 2 0 2 4 0 0 17 Lambeth 24 47 0 0 8 10 0 0 89 Lewisham 42 34 9 1 8 5 0 0 99 Merton 40 15 5 7 4 4 0 0 75 Newham 0 56 1 0 9 12 0 0 78 Redbridge 0 34 6 0 9 9 1 0 59 Richmond-upon-Thames 36 6 9 1 2 3 0 0 57 Southwark 113 69 6 16 21 23 0 0 248 Sutton 43 15 5 2 3 4 0 0 72 Tower Hamlets and City of London 82 34 11 11 8 5 0 0 151 Waltham Forest 0 29 0 8 7 5 0 0 49 Wandsworth 26 21 7 17 6 6 1 0 84 Westminster 0 28 2 2 6 6 0 0 44 2007-08 Barking and Dagenham 40 31 4 22 5 7 2 0 111 Barnet 25 12 7 2 2 5 0 0 53 Bexley 22 14 6 1 3 2 0 0 48 Brent 0 24 4 12 8 5 0 0 53 Bromley 0 27 0 2 7 3 0 0 39 Camden 0 32 6 2 8 5 0 0 53 Croydon 42 39 0 12 8 7 1 0 109 Ealing 33 29 2 10 8 4 0 0 86 Enfield 28 35 2 0 10 4 0 0 79 Greenwich 0 26 8 0 8 6 1 0 49 Hackney 35 43 8 2 14 13 0 0 115 Hammersmith and Fulham 50 34 4 4 8 6 2 0 108 Haringey 0 41 13 0 16 5 0 0 75 Harrow 55 15 8 13 7 3 1 0 102 Havering 31 19 5 12 4 3 0 0 74 Hillingdon 47 25 1 16 4 5 1 0 99 Hounslow 19 22 4 26 6 6 0 0 83 Islington 0 23 2 6 5 5 0 0 41 Kensington and Chelsea 25 22 4 0 3 5 1 0 60 Kingston-upon-Thames 11 10 5 0 1 2 0 0 29 Lambeth 54 43 2 9 12 9 0 0 129 Lewisham 43 38 3 0 4 5 1 0 94 Merton 50 15 3 5 3 4 2 0 82 Newham 14 47 1 3 14 11 2 0 92 Redbridge 0 30 6 0 9 10 2 0 57 Richmond-upon-Thames 99 7 8 4 1 4 0 0 123 Southwark 113 90 6 16 21 6 4 0 256 Sutton 35 13 7 0 2 4 1 0 62 Tower Hamlets and City of London 51 20 1 8 11 4 0 0 95 Waltham Forest 0 29 3 2 9 4 0 0 47 Wandsworth 49 24 5 30 5 5 1 0 119 Westminster 15 40 0 0 6 2 2 0 65 2006-07 Barking and Dagenham 16 29 1 22 6 6 1 0 81 Barnet 32 17 4 12 4 3 2 0 74 Bexley 22 15 4 2 3 2 0 0 48 Brent 35 24 2 14 10 7 0 0 92 Bromley 35 16 6 0 2 2 0 0 61 Camden 0 29 9 1 8 5 2 0 54 Croydon 48 36 1 19 8 7 0 0 119 Ealing 34 23 4 12 6 4 1 0 84 Enfield 23 32 2 0 10 3 0 0 70 Greenwich 0 21 6 5 7 6 0 0 45 Hackney 33 35 4 2 11 4 1 0 90 Hammersmith and Fulham 34 27 4 4 8 8 2 0 87 Haringey 28 38 12 36 11 6 4 0 135 Harrow 52 11 4 10 6 4 2 0 89 Havering 39 18 7 20 5 3 0 0 92 Hillingdon 47 25 0 11 5 5 1 0 94 Hounslow 22 19 1 24 6 5 2 0 79 Islington 0 23 2 6 5 5 0 0 41 Kensington and Chelsea 17 20 2 6 5 3 1 0 54 Kingston-upon-Thames 48 7 4 0 0 2 1 0 62 Lambeth 55 46 1 0 14 3 0 0 119 Lewisham 69 38 2 0 6 4 2 0 121 Merton 35 13 2 0 3 3 2 0 58 Newham 48 59 0 16 22 17 4 0 166 Redbridge 0 28 7 0 10 8 1 0 54 Richmond-upon-Thames 66 7 10 4 2 2 1 0 92 Southwark 113 74 6 16 21 6 5 0 241 Sutton 118 15 3 0 2 4 0 0 142 Tower Hamlets and City of London 37 24 1 13 9 4 2 0 90 Waltham Forest 31 27 2 0 7 4 0 0 71 Wandsworth 57 25 5 21 4 4 2 0 118 Westminster 15 40 o 0 6 2 2 0 65 2005-06 Barking and Dagenham 12 26 6 16 7 7 1 0 75 Barnet 2 1 16 3 4 2 13 0 41 Bexley 13 15 3 2 3 2 1 0 39 Brent 22 24 0 15 9 5 1 0 76 Bromley 22 18 4 9 2 2 0 0 57 Camden 0 23 6 3 8 5 4 0 49 Croydon 38 31 2 18 8 7 0 0 104 Ealing 0 23 12 7 6 3 0 0 51 Enfield 0 17 2 11 11 3 0 0 44 Greenwich 0 21 4 1 7 4 0 0 37 Hackney 2 27 3 1 8 6 0 0 47 Hammersmith and Fulham 23 28 2 4 7 5 2 0 71 Haringey 27 30 7 77 12 4 1 0 158 Harrow 40 10 6 12 7 4 0 0 79 Havering 18 17 2 8 4 2 1 0 52 Hillingdon 24 21 1 12 3 3 0 0 64 Hounslow 32 19 1 16 6 5 0 0 79 Islington 25 21 1 4 5 3 0 0 59 Kensington and Chelsea 26 20 2 2 3 3 0 0 56 Kingston-upon-Thames 10 7 4 3 0 2 0 0 26 Lambeth 0 38 1 0 9 4 0 0 52 Lewisham 71 40 2 0 5 4 2 0 124 Merton 36 10 2 0 2 5 2 0 57 Newham 0 61 0 5 20 20 3 0 109 Redbridge 0 25 5 1 9 9 0 0 49 Richmond-upon-Thames 113 10 10 11 3 4 1 0 152 Southwark 106 64 6 20 20 6 4 0 226 Sutton 104 12 2 0 3 4 0 0 125 Tower Hamlets and City of London 22 22 0 12 7 5 3 0 71 Waltham Forest 31 28 0 0 7 3 0 0 69 Wandsworth 58 24 4 10 3 4 0 0 103 Westminster 0 34 2 0 6 2 1 0 45 2004-05 Barking and Dagenham 0 18 0 8 4 3 0 0 33 Barnet 1 2 3 4 12 2 2 0 26 Bexley 5 15 3 4 2 2 0 0 31 Brent 0 17 5 0 7 6 0 0 35 Bromley 28 14 2 9 5 2 0 0 60 Camden 16 21 9 0 5 4 2 0 57 Croydon 123 27 6 0 7 4 0 0 167 Ealing 0 23 12 7 6 3 0 0 51 Enfield 45 27 2 0 7 4 0 0 85 Greenwich 0 21 4 2 5 5 1 0 38 Hackney 2 23 3 8 6 4 2 0 48 Hammersmith and Fulham 0 33 11 5 0 4 2 0 55 Haringey 36 42 6 13 12 5 3 0 117 Harrow 55 11 6 15 5 5 1 0 98 Havering 28 20 0 10 4 2 1 0 65 Hillingdon 18 17 3 11 3 3 0 0 55 Hounslow 42 15 4 15 4 5 0 0 85 Islington 62 22 2 4 6 5 6 0 107 Kensington and Chelsea 16 17 1 1 4 4 0 0 43 Kingston-upon-Thames 0 8 1 0 2 2 0 0 13 Lambeth 49 36 3 35 11 13 2 0 149 Lewisham 0 24 4 0 16 4 3 0 51 Merton 44 16 1 0 3 2 0 0 66 Newham 0 48 1 0 12 6 7 0 74 Redbridge 0 30 0 0 8 5 1 0 44 Richmond-upon-Thames 67 10 9 5 2 2 0 0 95 Southwark 0 61 4 0 17 4 5 0 91 Sutton 0 10 5 0 2 3 0 0 20 Tower Hamlets and City of London 25 21 0 11 7 5 1 0 70 Waltham Forest 0 14 1 3 6 5 0 0 29 Wandsworth 47 16 5 4 3 4 0 0 79 Westminster 0 30 1 0 5 2 0 0 38
Communities and Local Government
Affordable Housing
During 2009-10 there are 10 local authorities and 48 registered social landlords offering social homebuy. The total housing stock (as at April 2009) owned by these local authorities was 198,000 and the total stock owned by these RSLs (as at 31 March 2009) was 721,000. RSL stock includes that owned by subsidiaries where the parent RSL is offering social homebuy.
Sources:
1. Stock figures are taken from local authority returns to the Business Plan Statistical Appendix for 2008-09:
http://www.communities.gov.uk/housing/housingresearch/housingstatistics/housingstatisticsby/localauthorityhousing/dataforms/hssa0809/bpsadata200809/
2. Regulatory and Statistical Returns to the Tenant Services Authority for 2009:
https://www.rsrsurvey.co.uk//
Allotments
A table providing data on the number of granted applications requesting consent to dispose of statutory allotments, from 1 January 2000 until 31December 2009 broken down by local authority area has been placed in the Library of the House. We do not hold complete data for years prior to 2000.
Arc Manche
The Arc Manche Network and Assembly have made no specific bids for funding under the Interreg IV programmes.
The Department will place a copy of the Espace Manche Development Initiative bid documentation in the Library. The details of the award and grant offer letter are commercially in confident documents and are not available to us. These are held by the French Managing Authority based in Lille and Haute Normandie as Lead Partner for the Project.
Audit Commission: Official Hospitality
This is an operational matter for the Audit Commission and I have asked the Chief Executive of the Audit Commission to write to the hon. Member direct.
Letter from Steve Bundred, dated 25 March 2010:
The event held at the Reform Club on 21 April 2008 was the Commission's 25tn anniversary event.
Invitations were sent to key stakeholders and people who had played a significant part in the Commission's history. No list of those who actually attended the event exists.
A copy of this letter will be placed in Hansard.
Audit Commission: Training
This is an operational matter for the Audit Commission and I have asked the Chief Executive of the Audit Commission to write to the hon. Member direct.
Letter from Steve Bundred, dated 25 March 2010:
The payments to the AA driving school relate to seven members of staff who attended one day advanced driver training courses. Two of the individuals are auditors, two are IT specialists and three are performance specialists.
All seven members of staff drive a high number of business miles each year and all had been involved in car accidents whilst driving on Commission business. The purpose of the driving courses is to analyse and improve the skills of high risk drivers and attendance contributes to reducing insurance costs.
A copy of this letter will be placed in Hansard.
Council Housing: Oldham
Government are committed to clearing the attributable housing debt of Oldham council if its tenants vote in favour of transfer. The Homes and Communities Agency (HCA), which has responsibility for the delivery of the housing transfer programme, completed its assessment of Oldham's transfer application in October 2009.
The HCA was satisfied that the transfer proposals, including the indicative Overhanging debt total, met the necessary criteria as set out in guidance. Accordingly, the HCA recommended that Oldham be given a place on the transfer programme. In his written ministerial statement of December 2009, the Housing Minister agreed a place on the programme for Oldham, enabling the council to proceed to Stage One of the tenant consultation process.
Council Tax
Details of the average Band D council tax in each local authority area in England in each year since 1997-98 are available on the Communities and Local Government website at:
http://www.communities.gov.uk/localgovernment/localregional/localgovernmentfinance/statistics/counciltax/
I refer the hon. Member to the written ministerial statement I have made today.
Departmental Termination of Employment
The following table shows the amount the Department spent on compulsory early severance in the financial years 2006-07 to 2008-09.
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 AA — 51,848 409,371 AO 271,875 399,341 62,760 EO 996,821 1,142,191 86,915 HEO 1,822,327 1,411,960 138,928 SEO 670,969 722,032 13,851 Grade 7 757,784 307,937 — Grade 6 129,424 — — SCS 136,557 — 183,054 Total 4,785,757 4,035,309 894,879
The following table shows the number of staff who left the Department on compulsory early severance in the financial years 2006-07 to 2008-09.
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 AA — 1 8 AO 7 8 1 EO 21 18 1 HEO 25 17 2 SEO 6 6 1 Grade 7 6 4 — Grade 6 2 — — SCS 1 — 1 Total 68 54 14
There were no staff who left the Department on flexible early severance in the financial years 2006-07 to 2008-09.
Communities and Local Government came into existence on 5 May 2006 and information about compulsory or flexible early severance before to this date can be provided only at disproportionate cost.
We are unable to provide details for the current financial year 2009-10 as the figures have not yet been produced in their final form.
The following table shows the amount the Department spent on compulsory early retirement in the financial years 2006-07 to 2008-09.
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 AA — 8,990 131,433 AO 149,733 116,859 — EO 215,454 77,655 20,571 HEO 635,800 166,882 45,766 SEO 431,587 110,952 — Grade 7 482,031 254,341 120,677 Grade 6 197,165 25,661 — SCS 1,154,201 994,597 614,940 Total 3,265,971 1,755,937 933,387
The following table shows the number of staff who left the Department on compulsory early retirement in the financial years 2006-07 to 2008-09
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 AA — 1 3 AO 10 10 — EO 12 6 2 HEO 21 9 2 SEO 17 7 — Grade 7 17 9 3 Grade 6 5 1 — SCS 6 — — Total 88 43 10
The following table shows the amount the Department spent on flexible early retirement and the number of staff who left under these terms in the financial years 2006-07 to 2008-09.
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 AA — — 16,336 Total — — 16,336 Number of staff — — 1 Total — — 1
The Department for Communities and Local Government came into existence on 5 May 2006 and information about compulsory or flexible early retirements prior to this date can be provided only at disproportionate cost.
We are unable to provide details for the current financial year 2009-10 as the year end figures have not yet been completed.
Disadvantage: Greater London
The indices of deprivation 2007 and 2004 (ID 2007 and ID 2004) were constructed at Lower Super Output Area (LSOA) level. LSOAs are consistent in size and over time, and allow identification of small pockets of deprivation. This also overcomes difficulties in producing statistics for electoral wards associated with frequent boundary changes. There are 32,482 LSOAs in England.
Domains within the Indices of Deprivation are independent dimensions of multiple deprivation, each with their own impact on multiple deprivation relative to its importance. In the ID2004 and ID2007 the overall IMD was constructed by combining the individual domain indices using explicit weights, driven by theoretical considerations and research into the issue of weighting carried out by the University of St. Andrews (Dibben et al., 20071). The weightings are as follows:
Domain weight (percentage) Income Deprivation 22.5 Employment Deprivation 22.5 Health Deprivation and Disability 13.5 Education, Skills and Training Deprivation 13.5 Barriers to Housing and Services 9.3 Crime 9.3 Living Environment Deprivation 9.3
Six summary measures of the Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2007 and 2004 have been produced at both local authority district and unitary authority levels. The summary measures at district level focus on different aspects of multiple deprivation in the area. The six measures are Average Score, Average Rank, Extent, Local Concentration, Income Scale, and Employment Scale.
1 Dibben, C, Atherton, I., Cox, M., Watson, V., Ryan, M. and Sutton, M. (2007) Investigating the Impact of Changing the Weights that Underpin the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2004, London: Communities and Local Government
ID2007 and the local authority summaries can be found here:
http://www.communities.gov.uk/communities/neighbourhoodrenewal/deprivation/deprivation07/
ID2004 and the local authority summaries can be found here:
http://www.communities.gov.uk/archived/general-content/communities/indicesofdeprivation/216309/
Statistics for the indices of deprivation 2000 (ID 2000) were produced for each of the 8,414 wards in England and then summarised by district. They are available to download here:
http://www.communities.gov.uk/archived/general-content/communities/indicesofdeprivation/indicesofdeprivation/
Empty Property: Council Tax
No estimate is available.
European Regional Development Fund
The European Court of Auditors and European Commission have produced three audit reports on 2000-06 English ERDF programmes in the last 24 months. However, these reports contain classified financial information about individual organisations and it would be inappropriate for me to place copies of the reports in the Library.
European Regional Development Fund
The Commission does not impose fines on member states in relation to irregularities found during the course of applying management controls to the administration of European Regional Development Funds (ERDF). It does apply Financial Corrections where, in its view, those management controls have not met the high standard they require. These are estimated to remove that element of funds not subject to audit that might have been found to be irregular.
The only Financial Correction applied to the 2000-2006 ERDF programmes was imposed on the NW Objective 2 and URBAN programmes for failures in management control (Article 4 of regulation (EC) 438/2001). This amounted to €30,886,153. The total value of the programmes is €860,000,000.
The latest estimate of contingent liabilities arising from possible Financial Corrections and other disallowances was published in the recent Spring Supplementary Estimates as £113,450,000. My Department will be reviewing this figure in the context of the 2009-2010 resource accounts to be published in June.
Government Office for London: Expenditure
The information requested is set out in the following table:
Allocations/delegations issued to GOL European Programmes Grants to GLA Total 1998-99 — — — l,440 1999-00 — — — 2,202 2000-01 — — — l,605 2001-02 — — — 2,094 2002-03 — — — 2,530 2003-04 — — — 2,724 2004-05 — — — 3,323 2005-06 211 105 2,218 2,534 2006-07 193 92 2,428 2,713 2007-08 108 66 2,559 2,732 2008-09 29 72 48 148 2009-10 20 0 48 68 Notes: 1 We do not hold figures for 1996-1997 and 1997-1998 and do not have a breakdown of expenditure prior to 2005-06. 2. Since 2008-09, funding for the Greater London Authority for TfL and the LDA, which GOL had administered since 2000, is now directly administered by DFT and BIS. 3. From 2009-10 responsibility for European Programmes was transferred to the Greater London Authority. 4. The figures for 2009-10 are allocations rather than expenditure. 5. All figures are rounded.
Government Offices for the Regions: Finance
(2) pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for Falmouth and Camborne of 24 February 2010, Official Report, column 611W, on Government Offices for the Regions: finance, what the aggregate monetary value was of programme budgets in the most recent year for which figures are available.
The information requested is as follows:
2009-10 Regional Government Office Projected running (admin) costs expenditure Projected Aggregate programme expenditure GO North East 8,673,300 8,966,485 GO North West 11,051,400 37,135,586 GO Yorkshire and Humber 9,049,700 24,492,668 GO West Midlands 11,373,700 12,353,792 GO East Midlands 7,856,600 7,856,265 GO East 8,899,400 13,760,080 GO South East 10,139,500 9,935,892 GO South West 9,625,000 6,403,683 GO London 11,051,100 68,242,781
Programme figures relate solely to programmes which are administered by the GOs on behalf of the 12 sponsoring Departments.
Projected aggregate programme expenditure for 2009-10 excludes European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) expenditure. The details of the ERDF 2000-06 expenditure defrayed in 2009-10 will not be available until September 2010, at the earliest, after the audits are completed by the Director General for Regional Policy-European Commission. ERDF expenditure for 2007-13 is administered by the Regional Development Agency’s (RDAs).
The information requested is shown in the following table.
From 2001-02 the Government Office Network changed the way it accounted for corporate service administration budgets centralising the Information Communication Technology budgets rather than them being managed by the individual Government Offices. Further centralisation of budgets took place for Learning and Development in 2007-08 and Estates from 2008-09.
Government Office 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 North East 8,687.15 8,616.75 8,618.84 8,312.05 8,197.33 9,002.29 9,954.46 North West¹ 9,839.09 9,442.59 13,690.13 13,048.58 13,651.03 15,344.87 15,523.52 Merseyside¹ 4,349.95 4,199.53 12.24 — — — — Yorks and Humber 8,765.04 8,475.01 8,683.92 8,888.68 9,357.48 10,036.85 10,943.77 West Midlands 10,040.37 9,757.79 9,474.35 9,330.15 9,960.76 10,295.51 10,662.85 East Midlands 6,616.67 6,436.24 6,754.39 6,951.28 7,335.77 8,244.80 8,713.24 East 6,168.97 6,270.62 6,269.43 7,005.47 7,542.48 8,631.95 9,355.85 South West 7,140.74 6,825.73 6,985.03 7,796.87 8,711.38 10,666.90 11,860.77 South East 8,406.18 8,544.99 8,561.40 8,658.61 9,477.26 10,326.44 10,874.74 London 14,106.47 13,458.82 13,238.12 13,715.79 13,860.98 13,161.20 14,038.84 Corporate Services² 1,696.34 4,355.96 3,095.29 3,702.74 4,732.81 9,507.95 7,531.60 Total 85,816.97 86,384.03 85,383.14 87,410.22 92,827.28 105,218.76 109,459.64
Government Office 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 North East 12,167.24 13,887.09 13,138.16 12,730.25 11,826.45 10,178.90 8,673.30 North West¹ 16,808.94 17,777.86 17,745.45 16,933.67 16,095.53 12,184.09 11,051.40 Merseyside¹ — — — — — — — Yorks and Humber 12,480.23 13,453.18 13,494.30 10,676.64 13,447.21 8,922.60 9,049.70 West Midlands 13,381.47 15,286.08 14,497.15 14,925.87 15,000.75 10,834.07 11,373.70 East Midlands 11,153.67 11,937.13 12,530.66 11,490.17 10,857.39 8,873.74 7,856.60 East 12,841.51 15,075.61 13,296.12 12,211.64 11,398.50 9,109.56 8,899.40 South West 13,960.23 14,724.92 14,823.08 13,677.13 13,763.68 10,461.02 9,625.00 South East 14,099.03 14,372.51 14,624.51 14,570.49 13,105.84 10,559.56 10,139.50 London 16,654.91 18,870.09 18,483.70 17,595.20 16,198.99 11,811.52 11,051.10 Corporate services² 14,988.76 13,389.19 14,693.52 16,348.41 16,743.70 39,217.91 37,230.04 Total 138,535.98 148,773.66 147,326.65 141,159.47 138,438.04 132,152.97 124,949.74 ¹ GO-North West and GO-Merseyside merged during 1998-1999. ² From 2001-02 the Government Office Network changed the way it accounted for corporate service administration budgets centralising the Information Communication Technology budgets rather than them being managed by the individual Government Offices. Further centralisation of budgets took place for Learning and Development in 2007-08 and Estates from 2008-09.
Joint Improvement Partnerships
The National Improvement and Efficiency Strategy, published in December 2007, set out the agreement with the sector that RIEPs would:
commit to supporting councils and partnerships in difficulty, ensuring resources are devoted to prevention and support;
focus resources on supporting innovation and efficiency as a means of delivering excellent LAAs;
establish strong governance arrangements that ensure strong member leadership of and engagement in the RIEP and ownership of the strategy by all members in the region;
base their regional improvement and efficiency strategy on a robust analysis of need across the region, using both data and consultation to develop the strategy; and
report annually to councils and partnerships in the region and the LGA-Government-Chief Executives’ Task Group governance structure, accounting for the distribution and use of funding and progress against priorities, and providing reassurance that these minimum standards are being met.
Supported by RIEPs and the Department of Health, the Joint Improvement Partnerships (JIPs) seek to improve adult health and social care provision through partnership working between local authorities, NHS, the voluntary and community sector, other partner organisations, and people who use services and carers. There is a JIP in every English region, and they help to share information, learning and skills; support collaborative project work; and, contribute towards workforce development in the adult social care sector.
Local Authority Business Growth Incentives Scheme
For the period 2005-06 to 2007-08, £1 billion was allocated to LABGI: £935 million to England and £65 million to Wales. The National Assembly for Wales has been responsible for distribution of its LABGI allocation. The Government distributed LABGI grant in England totalling £50 million in 2009-10; and has recently indicated that it also intends to distribute the same total amount in England in 2010-11.
(a) In England, the Government have given the following total regional LABGI grants each year:
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 East England 9,651,270 31,897,413 10,245,115 40,608,231 5,914,554 East Midlands 11,217,878 34,318,221 10,238,250 34,839,244 4,228,280 London 17,260,775 46,877,642 12,878,283 68,019,603 10,734,393 North East 8,282,619 25,326,820 5,165,671 34,893,787 2,116,631 North West 18,214,154 55,790,645 10,535,099 50,954,372 5,976,589 South East 14,054,485 32,183,210 14,274,492 41,615,272 8,400,294 South West 9,690,211 24,213,062 6,592,029 40,853,396 4,957,132 West Midlands 11,747,907 36,982,240 10,370,939 42,606,972 4,075,071 Yorkshire and the Humber 15,336,497 40,414,553 11,852,639 41,803,297 3,597,065
(b) The Government have published details of the final allocations to local authorities in England in Grant Determinations, which can be viewed on the Communities and Local Government website at:
http://www.communities.gov.uk/localgovernment/local governmentfinance/labgi/
and
http://www.communities.gov.uk/localgovernment/localgovernmentfinance/labgi/labgischeme2/
The main Grant Determinations can be viewed at:
05/06 Grant Determination (No 1) 2006 [No 31/233] (7 February 2006)
http://www.local.communities.gov.uk/finance/labgi/dtmn0506.pdf
05/06 Grant Determination (No 2) 2006 [No 31/249] (27 February 2006)
http://www.local.communities.gov.uk/finance/labgi/dtmn0506v2.pdf
05/06 Grant Determination (No 3) 2006 [No 31/491] (19 July 2006)
http://www.local.communities.gov.uk/finance/labgi/dtmn0506v3.pdf
06/07 Grant Determination 2007 [No 31/554] (27 February 2007)
http://www.local.communities.gov.uk/finance/labgi/dtmn0607.pdf
06/07 Grant Determination (no 2) 2007 [No 31/892] (6 September 2007)
http://www.local.communities.gov.uk/finance/labgi/dtmncode20.pdf
07/08 Grant Determination (No 2) 2008 [31/1238] (26 June 2008)
http://www.local.communities.gov.uk/finance/labgi/seconddtmn0708.pdf
Grant Determination 2009 [No 31/1287] (23 February 2009)
http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/localgovernment/pdf/LABusGrowIS
Grant Determination 2009 (no 2) (no 31/1640) (25 September 2009)
http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/local government/labgidetermination20092
Local Government
The Secretary of State has no plans to issue guidance to local authority monitoring officers on visits by hon. Members to premises and facilities owned by local authorities. Local authority members are required by their council’s statutory Code of Conduct to ensure their council’s resources are not used improperly for political purposes (including party political purposes).
Local Government Finance
I have been asked to reply.
The Government Equalities Office leads on the Equality Bill.
The duty will apply to decisions of a strategic nature. As we made clear in our guide to the duty, we would expect central government departments to have regard to the duty, alongside other considerations, when making strategic funding decisions.
Local Government: Complaints
The following table shows the number of complaints submitted each year and the number of complaints in each year on which either a local settlement was reached or the Ombudsman issued a report finding maladministration.
Complaints submitted Complaint settled locally or reported on by Ombudsman 1996-97 15,322 2,752 1997-98 14,969 2,694 1998-99 15,869 2,624 1999-2000 17,555 3,060 2000-01 19,179 3,945 2001-02 18,309 4,331 2002-03 17,610 3,857 2003-04 18,982 3,363 2004-05 18,698 3,042 2005-06 18,626 2,962 2006-07 18,320 3,088 2007-08 17,628 3,057 2008-09 21,012 2,885
Local Government: Equality
I have been asked to reply.
The Government Equalities Office leads on the Equality Bill.
The public sector duty regarding socio-economic inequalities will apply to decisions of a strategic nature. As we made clear in our guide to the duty, we would expect central government departments to have regard to the duty, alongside other considerations, when making strategic funding decisions.
The guide also makes clear that we would expect local authorities to have regard to the duty when drawing up their key plans and strategies. However, whether the duty is relevant to any particular local funding decision will be for the local authority to decide.
Local Government: Per Capita Costs
The average central Government grant per capita for the classes of authority specified since 1997-98 in real terms at 2008-09 prices is shown in the following table.
1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 District councils 85 79 79 80 82 82 89 83 86 96 96 98 Unitary councils 786 806 843 898 936 962 1,081 1,084 1,132 1,144 1,161 1,201 County councils 651 607 632 677 709 720 786 808 839 844 863 889 Metropolitan councils 877 921 969 1,029 1,082 1,107 1,247 1,289 1,344 1,358 1,375 1,414 London boroughs 1,043 1,072 1,113 1,169 1,214 1,230 1,346 1,371 1,419 1,430 1,452 1,473 Police authorities1 152 153 153 134 139 138 143 144 147 143 145 145 Fire authorities2,3 15 16 16 11 11 11 11 26 26 23 23 23 1 From 2000-01 onwards Metropolitan Police Authority data are collected within Greater London Authority. Hence separate data are not available. 2 From 2000-01 onwards London Fire and Civil Defence Authority data are collected within Greater London Authority. Hence separate data are not available. 3 From 2004-05 onwards Combined Fire Authorities (CFA) became precepting authorities. Notes: 1. The definition of central Government grant used here is the sum of Formula Grant (Revenue Support Grant, Redistributed Non-Domestic Rates and Police Grant), Greater London Authority (GLA) grant and specific grants inside Aggregate External Finance (AEF), i.e. Revenue Grants paid for council's core services. In past years, where applicable the SSA reduction grant and Central Support Protection Grants have also been included. From 2008-09 it also includes Area Based Grant (ABG). 2. Figures exclude grants outside AEF (i.e. where funding is not for authorities' core services, but is passed to a third party, for example, rent allowances and rebates), capital grants, funding for the local authorities' housing management responsibilities and those grant programmes (such as European funding) where authorities are simply one of the recipients of funding paid towards an area. 3. Per capita figures are calculated using Office for National Statistics' (ONS) Mid-Year Population estimates from 1997 to 2008. 4. The real terms figures are calculated using the latest HM Treasury GDP deflators. 5. From 2000-01 onwards Metropolitan Police Authority and London Fire and Civil Defence Authority data are collected within Greater London Authority returns. Hence separate data are not available. 6. From 2004-05 Combined Fire Authorities (CFA) became precepting authorities. Prior to this CFAs levied on county councils' budget requirements. 7. Comparison across years may not be valid owing to changing local authority responsibilities.
Local Government: Public Consultation
We do not require local authorities to report on this, but according to the Participatory Budgeting Unit, who collate information on our behalf, 63 top tier local area agreement (LAA) areas use some form of participatory budgeting. For details of those who are carrying out participatory budgeting, I refer the hon. Member to an answer I gave her on 12 January 2010, Official Report, column 890-92W.
Local Government: Devon and Norfolk
Following the approval by this House and the other place of the draft orders implementing unitary councils for Exeter and Norwich, I informed the House yesterday, Official Report, columns 38-41WS, that the Government had concluded it was right to proceed in making those orders, and that we intended to do so as soon as practicable. The orders were subsequently made yesterday and have come into force today.
Local Government: Translation Services
The information is not collected centrally.
Non-Domestic Rates
Local authorities estimated that 462,000 hereditaments were benefiting from Small Business Rate Relief (SBRR) on December 2008. By applying that figure to the eligibility estimates made for the 2005 rating list it is estimated that around 80 per cent. of eligible hereditaments were claiming SBRR in 2008-09 - see table 1. This estimate suggests that around 20 per cent. or 113,000 of eligible hereditaments are not claiming SBRR. However, relief granted to small businesses has been increasing since SBRR was introduced-from £202 million in 2005-06 to £298 million in 2008-09. This represents a real terms increase of 34 per cent. Furthermore in 2008-09, 92 per cent. of the total relief that would be paid if all those estimated to be eligible were to claim, was actually being paid - see table 2.
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Number of hereditaments actually claiming SBRR (thousand) 396 433 462 Number of hereditaments estimated to be occupied by eligible small businesses (thousand) 575 575 575 Percentage of estimated eligible actually claiming: 69 75 80
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Total relief that would be paid out if all properties estimated to be occupied by eligible small businesses were to claim1 (£ million) 295 300 315 325 Relief actually claimed: (£ million) 202 237 259 £98 Percentage take-up2 (%) 69 78 83 92 1 For details of how this estimate was made please see the paper "Small business rate relief-improving evidence on eligibility and take-up: Methodology" 2 Percentage of total relief, which would be paid if all eligible small businesses claimed it, that was actually paid
The information is as follows:
(a) The number of hereditaments above the rateable value threshold for Small Business Rate Relief by region on the 2005 Rating List are shown in the following table. These numbers are consistent with the statistical release titled “Non-domestic rateable values: 2010 Local Ratings Lists—England and Wales” published on 18 December 2009.
Government office region Number of hereditaments above the rateable value threshold1 for SBRR on 2005 Rating List North East 18,000 North West 59,000 Yorkshire and the Humber 41,000 East Midlands 35,000 West Midlands 47,000 East of England 51,000 London 81,000 South East 79,000 South West 42,000 Total 453,000 1 Hereditaments with a rateable value over £15,000 or £21,500 in London
(b), (c) and (d) The report “Small Business Rate Relief—improving evidence on eligibility and take-up was published on 9 December 2009 and it estimates that of the approximately 1.2 million non-domestic properties in England which fall below the current rateable value (RV) thresholds for SBRR, around 575,000 are occupied by eligible small businesses. This report has been validated by an independent peer review and is available at
http://www.communities.gov.uk
This methodology can only be applied nationally for England as a whole. Therefore it is not possible to calculate an estimate of eligibility of small business rate relief by region.
No estimate has been made of the monetary value of small business rate relief in each eligible firm in each region claiming the relief.
The amount of small business rate relief is collected from local authorities on a financial year basis. Therefore it is not possible to provide figures on how much small business rate relief has been claimed in 2009-10 to date. The amount of small business rate relief claimed by businesses in each region in 2009-10 will be available following the publication of the Statistical Release on “National non-domestic rates collected by local authorities in England 2009-10” later this year.
Non-Domestic Rates: Empty Property
Details of the number of properties on which empty property business rate relief was claimed in each region in England as at 31 December 2008, the latest date for which data are available, are given in the following table:
Number of properties claiming empty property relief as at 31 December 2008 (Thousand) North East 7.6 North West 27.6 Yorkshire and the Humber 17.1 East Midlands 12.2 West Midlands 18.2 East of England 15.0 London 20.8 South East 15.8 South West 13.6 Total England 147.9
Data as at 31 December 2009 will be available later in 2010.
Planning Permission
The density target in Planning Policy Statement 3 is an indicative target rather than a prescriptive one and it allows for flexibility where needed. PPS3 states that local planning authorities may wish to set out a range of densities across the plan area rather than one broad density range although 30 dwellings per hectare net should be used as a national indicative minimum to guide policy development and decision-making, until local density policies are in place. PPS3 goes on to say that where local authorities wish to plan for, or agree to, densities below this minimum, this will need to be justified.
Recycling: Conferences
This is an operational matter for the Audit Commission and I have asked the chief executive of the Audit Commission to write to the hon. Member direct.
Letter from Steve Bundred, dated 25 March 2010:
Your Parliamentary Question outlined above has been passed to me to reply.
A copy of the information requested has been placed in the House of Commons Library. The presentation referred to the Audit Commission report Well Disposed, which can be found on our website at:
www.audit-commission.gov.uk/nationalstudies/localgov/Pages/welldisposed.aspx
A copy of this letter will be placed in Hansard.
Right to Buy Scheme
The average right to buy discount in cash terms and real term and as a proportion of the market value of the property in England and its regions are shown in the table. Figures are not available prior to 1998-09 and the discounts in real terms are presented in 2008-09 prices in line with the latest GDP deflator series.
Average RTB discount per dwelling (cash terms) Average RTB discount per dwelling (in real terms) Average RTB discount as a percentage of market value North East 1998-99 14,490 18,469 48 1999-2000 10,670 13,337 47 2000-01 12,590 15,533 47 2001-02 11,680 14,096 46 2002-03 13,240 15,479 45 2003-04 14,850 16,885 42 2004-05 18,800 20,798 34 2005-06 21,140 22,959 34 2006-07 21,010 22,162 31 2007-08 21,460 22,001 28 2008-09 21,650 21,650 29 North West 1998-99 16,510 21,043 48 1999-2000 16,670 20,837 48 2000-01 16,700 20,604 47 2001-02 17,230 20,793 46 2002-03 18,200 21,278 45 2003-04 19,460 22,127 43 2004-05 21,370 23,641 41 2005-06 23,590 25,619 37 2006-07 24,580 25,927 34 2007-08 25,210 25,846 32 2008-09 25,370 25,370 32 Yorkshire and the Humber 1998-99 15,650 19,947 47 1999-2000 15,650 19,562 47 2000-01 15,630 19,284 46 2001-02 16,260 19,623 46 2002-03 16,270 19,021 44 2003-04 18,110 20,592 43 2004-05 20,250 22,402 40 2005-06 22,550 24,490 35 2006-07 23,030 24,292 31 2007-08 23,740 24,339 28 2008-09 23,050 23,050 29 East Midlands 1998-99 18,260 23,274 50 1999-2000 16,740 20,924 46 2000-01 17,100 21,097 45 2001-02 17,830 21,517 43 2002-03 21,390 25,007 41 2003-04 21,820 24,810 wok 2004-05 22,420 24,803 35 2005-06 22,770 24,729 31 2006-07 23,600 24,894 28 2007-08 23,850 24,452 27 2008-09 23,860 23,860 29 West Midlands 1998-99 18,230 23,236 49 1999-2000 18,470 23,087 48 2000-01 19,960 24,626 49 2001-02 19,840 23,943 47 2002-03 20,330 23,768 44 2003-04 22,580 25,675 40 2004-05 23,930 26,474 34 2005-06 25,060 27,216 33 2006-07 25,050 26,423 30 2007-08 25,620 26,266 30 2008-09 25,820 25,820 30 East 1998-99 25,020 31,890 49 1999-2000 27,350 34,187 47 2000-01 27,300 33,682 45 2001-02 27,830 33,586 43 2002-03 30,360 35,494 39 2003-04 31,360 35,658 35 2004-05 32,580 36,043 33 2005-06 33,250 36,110 30 2006-07 33,020 34,830 27 2007-08 33,790 34,643 25 2008-09 33,960 33,960 25 London 1998-99 34,070 43,425 53 1999-2000 36,150 45,186 51 2000-01 37,140 45,822 48 2001-02 36,990 44,640 42 2002-03 35,960 42,041 37 2003-04 37,190 42,287 32 2004-05 35,490 39,262 28 2005-06 30,280 32,885 22 2006-07 21,150 22,309 14 2007-08 20,710 21,233 13 2008-09 20,990 20,990 10 South East 1998-99 29,780 37,957 50 1999-2000 30,760 38,449 47 2000-01 31,060 38,321 44 2001-02 32,640 39,390 42 2002-03 34,510 40,346 39 2003-04 36,200 41,161 35 2004-05 36,640 40,535 32 2005-06 36,850 40,020 30 2006-07 36,500 38,501 28 2007-08 36,880 37,811 26 2008-09 36,690 36,690 26 South West 1998-99 21,230 27,059 50 1999-2000 21,670 27,087 48 2000-01 23,090 28,488 46 2001-02 24,880 30,025 44 2002-03 26,460 30,934 40 2003-04 28,430 32,326 36 2004-05 28,870 31,939 34 2005-06 29,150 31,658 31 2006-07 29,310 30,917 28 2007-08 29,660 30,408 27 2008-09 29,320 29,320 24 England 1998-99 22,880 29,162 50 1999-2000 23,630 29,537 48 2000-01 23,880 29,462 47 2001-02 23,380 28,215 44 2002-03 23,790 27,813 41 2003-04 24,640 28,017 37 2004-05 25,650 28,376 33 2005-06 25,530 27,726 31 2006-07 24,970 26,339 27 2007-08 25,340 25,979 24 2008-09 25,410 25,410 24 Source: Local authority returns to CLG on P1B
Tesco: Planning Permission
Copies of each of the Planning Inspectorate's appeal decisions have today been placed in the Library of the House.
It should be noted that in the instance of cases concerning linked appeals, joint decisions were issued.
Children, Schools and Families
GCSE
[holding answer 22 March 2010]: The information requested can be provided only at disproportionate cost.
The latest information on GCSE attainment has been published in SFR01/2010 “GCSE and Equivalent Results in England, 2008/09 (Revised)”, which was released on 13 January 2010. This is available on the Department’s website via the following link:
http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000909/index.shtml
Becta: Finance
The announcement proposed savings based on Becta’s 2010-11 allocated revenue budget of £65.151 million of which £2.25 million is received as an allocation from the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
The announced savings amount to £20 million in 2011-12 and £25 million in 2012-13. Details of the breakdown FY 2011-13 budgets have not yet been finalised.
Building Schools for the Future Programme
In accordance with the requirements of the European procurement regime, bidders are selected on the basis of the “most economically advantageous tender”. This means that the value for money of the bidders' proposals are tested in a confidential competitive environment and evaluated in terms of both price and quality against the local authority's requirements. There are a number of different approaches to project delivery available for Building Schools for the Future, the preferred approaches being to use a Local Education Partnership (LEP) or to use the Contractor Framework managed by Partnerships for Schools on behalf of the Department for Children, Schools and Families. When either approach is being used, the contractual arrangements between the parties require that value for money is demonstrated and that key performance indicators and continuous improvement commitments are met.
Once a supplier is selected, the authority monitors the work undertaken (or arranges for the work to be monitored) to ensure compliance with the contractual requirements upon which the price is based.
Children in Care: Child Trust Fund
[holding answer 17 March 2010]: Information about annual £100 Child Trust Fund top-up payments made by local authorities to the accounts of individual looked-after children who are eligible is not collected centrally. Statutory guidance
http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/everychildmatters/safeguarding andsocialcare/childrenincare/childtrustfund/childtrustfund/ 1
on arrangements for the payment of Child Trust Funds was issued to local authorities in England under section 7 of the Local Authority Social Services Act 1970 which they must act under when performing their duties under section 22(3)(a) (duty to promote the welfare of a looked after child) of the Children Act 1989. The devolved Administrations have also put guidance on the payment of Child Trust Funds in place.
1 Child Trust Fund Account Top Up Payments For Looked After Children: Statutory Guidance on Local Authority Practice in England.
Children: Human Trafficking
The Department does not collect this information which is in any case intrinsically difficult given the hidden nature of the crime. However, the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP) estimated that around 325 children were believed to have been trafficked into the UK. This was taken from their ‘Strategic Threat Assessment: Child Trafficking in the UK’ published in April 2009. The estimate was derived from data covering the period 1 March 2007 to 29 February 2008.
Children: Language Difficulties
Following the Bercow review of services for children and young people with speech, language and communication needs (SLCN), the Government published “Better Communication: An action plan to improve services for children and young people with SLCN”, backed by £12 million investment. As part of the action plan, we—together with the Department of Health are piloting good practice in commissioning SLCN services in 16 areas in order to develop a national framework to improve the way services are delivered for children across the country.
In the Early Years, we have taken substantial steps to improve the quality of early learning and care including the introduction of the Early Years Foundation Stage which sets the standards for supporting children’s early learning and care from birth to five. Alongside the EYFS, we are investing in the work force, including targeted programmes like Every Child a Talker (ECaT) designed to improve children’s early language development through professional development for practitioners. ECaT was launched with a first wave of local authorities in 2008. It has promoted co-operation between local services, especially between Speech and Language services and early learning and care, to support children experiencing and at risk of language delay. From April 2010, all local authorities in England will have been funded to run the programme.
Children: Protection
[holding answer 11 March 2010]: This is a matter for Ofsted. HM Chief Inspector, Christine Gilbert, has written to the hon. Member and a copy of her reply has been placed in the House Libraries.
Letter from Christine Gilbert, dated 10 March 2010:
Your recent parliamentary question has been passed to me, as Her Majesty's Chief Inspector, for response.
The Ofsted personnel who read the full serious case reviews are senior social care inspectors, usually Her Majesty's Inspectors (HMI) of social care. For quality assurance purposes, some parts of the full serious case reviews will also be read by their senior managers, who are also qualified social care professionals. As Her Majesty's Chief Inspector, I also have access to full serious case reviews.
A copy of this reply has been sent to Rt. Hon. Dawn Primarolo MP, Minister of State for Children, Young People and Families, and will be placed in the library of both Houses.
The Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) is sent an anonymised copy of each final Serious Case Review (SCR) by the LSCB concerned. These are forwarded by the relevant official in the DCSF Safeguarding Group to the researchers responsible for preparing biennial overview reports on Serious Case Reviews. Other post holders in the group may see a copy of a final SCR report if it is necessary for them to do so in the exercise of their responsibilities.
The statutory guidance “Working Together To Safeguard Children” states that Local Safeguarding Children Boards (LSCBs) are responsible for undertaking SCRs and for determining who should have access to any part of the SCR. The membership of the LSCB must include representatives from the local authority.
Children’s Centres
[holding answer 22 March 2010]: Sure Start Children’s Centres are becoming a universal service—on 16 March, the Prime Minster announced that the Government had met their target for 3,500 Sure Start Children’s Centres in England. Children’s Centres provide access to integrated services for young children and their families. They contribute to all Every Child Matters outcomes and a number of my Department’s Strategic Objectives, in particular: to secure the wellbeing and health of children and young people; achieve world class standards in education; and close the gap in educational achievement for children from disadvantaged backgrounds.
The National Evaluation of Sure Start, which has been under way since 2001, is comparing the development of children living in areas with children’s centres originally established as Sure Start Local Programmes with children living in other areas. Its most recent report published in 2008 provides evidence of improved outcomes for children and families living in early Sure Start areas. Families living in early Sure Start areas used more child and family-related services than those living elsewhere. The reported benefits appeared to apply to all social groups, including those facing most disadvantages.
The National Evaluation showed that children behave better and are more independent if they live in early Sure Start areas. Parents have more positive parenting skills and provide a better home learning environment for their children, helping prepare children to do well at school and make the most of their talents.
The 2008 Foundation Stage Profile results show that 21,000 more five-year-olds are achieving a good level of development across a range of areas of learning and at the same time gaps have narrowed—lowest achieving children and children from disadvantaged areas are starting to catch up. These results suggest that our reforms and investment in the early years—including through Sure Start—are starting to have an impact on all children, and in narrowing gaps.
The latest report from the National Evaluation of Sure Start indicated that young children living in the early Sure Start areas were more likely to have received the recommended immunisations and less likely to have had an accident resulting in injury.
The Department’s research on the use of children’s centres, carried out by Taylor Nelson Sofres, entailed interviews with parents and carers of young children during 2008. The report in 2009 indicated that 78 per cent. of respondents knew about their local centre, and 92 per cent. who had used their local centre were satisfied with the service they received. The report also showed high levels of satisfaction with individual services provided through children’s centres such as child care, nursery education, health, and family and parenting services.
Children’s Centres: Greater Manchester
[holding answer 1 March 2010]: The 40 designated Sure Start Children’s Centres in the city of Manchester local authority have a combined reach of over 35,000 children under five and their families. The 12 centres in Manchester, Central constituency have a combined reach of over 9,000 children under five and their families. Reach area defines those children and families with the opportunity to access children’s centres. Figures for the number of children under five and their families actually attending and using children’s centres are not collected centrally.
Children’s Centres: Merseyside
There are a total of 83 designated Sure Start Children’s Centres in Merseyside reaching over 66,800 children under five and their families. Reach area defines those children and families with the opportunity to access children’s centres. Merseyside is assumed to refer to five local authorities: Liverpool, Wirral, Sefton, St. Helen’s and Knowsley.
The Department’s guidance to children’s centre leaders and local authorities sets an expectation that they should evaluate the effectiveness of children’s centre services.
The National Evaluation of Sure Start started in 2001 and last reported in 2008. Evidence from the last report showed improvements in outcomes for children and families living in areas served by children’s centres, including children’s behaviour and parents’ support for their children’s learning at home. The benefits appeared to apply to all social groups, including those facing most disadvantage. Awareness and satisfaction of children’s centres is high. The TNS Research Report (2008) shows; 78 per cent. of all respondents knew about their local centre; 74 per cent. were familiar with the term ‘Children’s Centre’; and levels of satisfaction were very high with 92 per cent. of all users saying they were satisfied (68 per cent. were very satisfied). The Department has recently commissioned an evaluation of the implementation and impact of the full range of children's centres, with a first report expected in late 2010.
Departmental Advertising
The forecasted figures for the requested advertising streams in 2009/10 are outlined in the following table. Planned expenditure in these areas for 2010/11 is not available at this time.
Advertising stream Projected expenditure (£) Television 5,498,419 Radio 2,670,910 Print 1,576,590 Online 2,208,908
Departmental Audit
Similar data to those collected in the 2003-04 Allegations Audit were collected in 2004-05, and less detailed data on allegations were collected in 2007. The data collected in 2004-05 were used to inform the development of guidance on handling allegations of abuse made against those who work with children and young people, but were not published as a data set. The data collected in 2007 were used to inform the review of implementation of guidance on handling allegations. The analysis of those data were included within the report of the review published in May 2009 and are available to download from the Every Child Matters website.
Departmental Internet
The funding for the proposals outlined in “Support for All: the Families and Relationships Green Paper” has been allocated from current budgets. Funding of £1,058,000 has been allocated in 2009-10 to the BeGrand consortium to develop, build and maintain the service for grandparents.
The BeGrand consortium was contracted in August 2009 to develop and build the BeGrand service for grandparents. Funding of £1,058,000 has been allocated in 2009-10 and £1,156,000 has been allocated in 2010-11. Funding has not been allocated beyond March 2011 as the current spending review expires at 31 March 2011.
Departmental Marketing
The Department did not undertake any work on the two campaigns in 2008/09. Expenditure on the campaigns in 2009/10 is not currently available.
Departmental Official Cars
The Department for Children, Schools and Families was established in June 2007. Costs for providing official cars since inception are:
£ 1 June 2007-31 March 2008 1— 1 April 2008-31 March 2009 69,300 1 April 2009-present 55,398 1 Can be obtained only at disproportionate cost
GCSE
[holding answer 21 January 2010]: In 2009, there were 26 maintained mainstream secondary schools where more than 50 per cent. of pupils are eligible for free school meals and fewer than 30 per cent of pupils received five A*-C grades at GCSE including English and Mathematics but excluding equivalents.
In 2008, there were 33 maintained mainstream secondary schools where more than 50 per cent. of pupils are eligible for free school meals and fewer than 30 per cent. of pupils received five A*-C grades at GCSE including English and Mathematics but excluding equivalents.
Figures relating to free school meal eligibility were not collected in 1997.
Information regarding pupils eligible for free school meals is not collected from independent schools.
In 2009, 22,721 pupils at the end of Key Stage 4 were entered for GCSE examinations in the combination of English literature, physics, chemistry, biology, history and any modern foreign language.
Of these, 631 pupils were known to be eligible for free school meals, 22,084 were not eligible for free school meals and there were six pupils for whom free school meal eligibility could not be determined.
These figures relate to pupils in maintained schools only, including CTCs and academies. Information collected on free school meals forms part of the School Census which is carried out only in maintained schools. This free school meal information is then linked to attainment data. It relates to those pupils known to be eligible to receive free meals rather than those in receipt of free meals.
The requested information is shown in the following table and relates to pupils in 2009 in maintained schools only, including CTCs and academies.
known to be eligible for free school meals not eligible for free school meals Pupils who entered for GCSEs in: English literature 44,942 399,628 Physics 2,954 64,231 Chemistry 2,985 64,334 Biology 3,525 67,757 History 13,466 160,415 At least one modern foreign language 19,030 220,167
Information collected on free school meals forms part of the School Census which is only carried out in maintained schools. This free school meal information is then linked to attainment data. It relates to those pupils known to be eligible to receive free meals rather than those in receipt of free meals.
In 2009, 17,784 pupils eligible for free school meals gained five GCSEs at A*-C including English and mathematics and excluding equivalents.
In 2009, 248,348 pupils in comprehensive schools gained five GCSEs at A*-C including English and mathematics and excluding equivalents.
These figures were derived from the National Pupil Database (NPD).
[holding answer 1 March 2010]: The information requested is presented in the following table and is for maintained schools only.
Eligible for FSM Not eligible for FSM Eligible for FSM Not eligible for FSM 2003 791 33,538 1.0 6.8 2009 1,257 45,535 1.7 9.0 1 Figures for 2003 are based on pupils aged 15 and 2009 figures are based on pupils at the end of key stage 4. Source: National Pupil Database
GCSE: Disadvantaged
[holding answer18 January 2010]: The information requested for the academic year 2008/09 is provided in the following table:
IMD decile2 Number of schools Number of schools where fewer than 30 per cent. of eligible pupils achieved 5+ A*-C at GCSE including English and maths GCSEs, excluding equivalents in 2008/09 Percentage of schools where fewer than 30 per cent. of eligible pupils achieved 5+ A*-C at GCSE including English and maths GCSEs, excluding equivalents in 2008/09 0-10%—most deprived 233 88 38 90-100%—least deprived 292 4 1 England total 2,988 398 13 1 Including only those open maintained mainstream schools with results published in the relevant years Achievement and Attainment tables and with more than ten pupils at the end of Key Stage 4 on roll. 2 2007 Indices of Multiple Deprivation at Super Output Area level based on the location of the school. 3 Pupils at the end of Key Stage 4. 4 Qualifications included are full GCSEs, GCSE short courses, GCSE double awards, vocational single and double GCSEs and AS-levels. Source: Achievement and Attainment Tables (2008/09 revised data)
GCSE: Truancy
The latest data which match absence with attainment data are available for 2008 and relate to persistent absentees rather than ‘truants'.
In 2008, 7.2 per cent. of persistent absentees in state funded secondary schools attained five or more GCSEs at grade A*-C or the equivalent, including GCSEs in English and mathematics. In 2007 this figure was lower with 6.4 per cent. of persistent absentees attaining five or more GCSEs at grade A*-C or the equivalent, including GCSEs in English and mathematics in state funded secondary schools.
The available information relates to persistent absentees, who are defined as pupils missing approximately 20 per cent. of possible sessions for the relevant statistical reporting period. On an annual basis this threshold is 64 or more sessions of absence, (authorised or unauthorised) during the year. (On a two term, autumn and spring basis, the threshold is typically 52 sessions). Unauthorised absence is defined as absence without leave from a teacher or other authorised representative of the school. This includes all unexplained or unjustified absences, such as lateness, holidays during term time not authorised by the school, absence where reason is not yet established and truancy.
Languages: Schools
As part of the specialist schools programme, which covers only schools in England, there are 381 specialist language schools. Since 2005, 199 schools have been given specialist language college status; 17 in 2005, 77 in 2006, 14 in 2007, 46 in 2008 and 45 in 2009.
National Bullying Helpline
The Department’s financial records show that no payments have been made to either the ‘National Bullying Helpline’ or ‘HR and Diversity Management Ltd.’ since 2004.
National Curriculum Tests
[holding answer 24 March 2010]: The latest information is available in the 2009 Achievement and Attainment Tables (AATs) and the Library.
The 2009 AATs can be found at:
http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/performancetables/primary_09.shtml
National Curriculum Tests: Sheffield
(2) how many schools in each Sheffield constituency there were in which fewer than 30 per cent. of pupils achieved five or more GCSEs at grades A*-C including English and mathematics in each year since 1998;
(3) how many and what proportion of pupils achieved five or more GCSEs at grades A*-C in each Sheffield constituency in each year since 1998.
The available information for PQ 323757 is in table one. Information on the number of pupils achieving level 4 or above at Key Stage 2 in English and mathematics combined is not available before the 2003/04 academic year.
The available information for PQ 323758 and the requested information for PQ 323759 is in tables two and three. The academic year 2004/05 was the first year in which the Department published school level data on the percentage of schools achieving five or more A*-C grades at GCSE or equivalent including English and maths GCSEs.
Number of pupils achieving level 4 in English Proportion of pupils achieving level 4 in English Number of pupils achieving level 4 in mathematics Proportion of pupils achieving level 4 in mathematics Number of pupils achieving level 4 in English and mathematics Proportion of pupils achieving level 4 in English and mathematics 1998 Sheffield, Attercliffe 592 55 559 51 n/a n/a Sheffield, Brightside 457 42 435 40 n/a n/a Sheffield Central 468 47 434 44 n/a n/a Sheffield, Hallam 640 80 621 78 n/a n/a Sheffield, Heeley 504 57 472 54 n/a n/a Sheffield, Hillsborough 717 66 647 60 n/a n/a 1999 Sheffield, Attercliffe 726 63 742 64 n/a n/a Sheffield, Brightside 544 53 567 55 n/a n/a Sheffield Central 544 53 557 55 n/a n/a Sheffield, Hallam 672 84 683 86 n/a n/a Sheffield, Heeley 623 61 660 64 n/a n/a Sheffield, Hillsborough 783 72 786 72 n/a n/a 2000 Sheffield, Attercliffe 743 69 696 65 n/a n/a Sheffield, Brightside 604 57 585 55 n/a n/a Sheffield Central 566 58 526 54 n/a n/a Sheffield, Hallam 740 87 722 85 n/a n/a Sheffield, Heeley 643 69 611 65 n/a n/a Sheffield, Hillsborough 824 75 821 74 n/a n/a 2001 Sheffield, Attercliffe 728 67 680 63 n/a n/a Sheffield, Brightside 574 54 511 48 n/a n/a Sheffield Central 566 57 590 60 n/a n/a Sheffield, Hallam 685 85 666 83 n/a n/a Sheffield, Heeley 615 65 578 61 n/a n/a Sheffield, Hillsborough 871 78 833 75 n/a n/a 2002 Sheffield, Attercliffe 834 71 852 73 n/a n/a Sheffield, Brightside 584 55 596 56 n/a n/a Sheffield Central 564 56 599 60 n/a n/a Sheffield, Hallam 745 87 734 85 n/a n/a Sheffield, Heeley 677 67 673 66 n/a n/a Sheffield, Hillsborough 860 74 873 75 n/a n/a 2003 Sheffield, Attercliffe 847 71 832 69 n/a n/a Sheffield, Brightside 578 54 556 52 n/a n/a Sheffield Central 563 60 565 61 n/a n/a Sheffield, Hallam 702 85 697 85 n/a n/a Sheffield, Heeley 670 69 657 68 n/a n/a Sheffield, Hillsborough 911 78 829 71 n/a n/a 2004 Sheffield, Attercliffe 899 75 821 69 758 64 Sheffield, Brightside 586 57 572 56 469 46 Sheffield Central 611 63 592 61 510 52 Sheffield, Hallam 748 88 711 84 682 80 Sheffield, Heeley 620 67 600 65 529 57 Sheffield, Hillsborough 903 80 870 77 794 71 2005 Sheffield, Attercliffe 876 74 822 70 767 65 Sheffield, Brightside 606 61 569 57 493 50 Sheffield Central 618 64 597 62 510 53 Sheffield, Hallam 728 88 684 83 659 80 Sheffield, Heeley 639 69 614 66 545 59 Sheffield, Hillsborough 886 82 826 77 779 72 2006 Sheffield, Attercliffe 878 75 828 71 754 65 Sheffield, Brightside 576 57 559 55 465 46 Sheffield Central 602 65 579 62 507 54 Sheffield, Hallam 706 88 689 86 654 81 Sheffield, Heeley 606 70 615 71 544 62 Sheffield, Hillsborough 809 79 784 77 721 70 2007 Sheffield, Attercliffe 871 78 810 72 753 67 Sheffield, Brightside 569 59 559 58 469 49 Sheffield Central 530 62 505 59 435 51 Sheffield, Hallam 713 90 682 86 656 83 Sheffield, Heeley 624 73 600 70 542 63 Sheffield, Hillsborough 851 81 820 78 750 72 2008 Sheffield, Attercliffe 866 77 815 73 748 67 Sheffield, Brightside 603 64 621 66 516 55 Sheffield Central 632 68 619 67 529 57 Sheffield, Hallam 749 91 721 88 701 85 Sheffield, Heeley 644 74 612 70 549 63 Sheffield, Hillsborough 921 85 891 82 843 78 2009 Sheffield, Attercliffe 814 76 789 74 706 66 Sheffield, Brightside 549 62 579 65 481 54 Sheffield Central 634 70 651 72 557 61 Sheffield, Hallam 737 88 710 85 690 82 Sheffield, Heeley 636 73 661 76 591 68 Sheffield, Hillsborough 901 84 871 82 821 77 n/a = Not available. 1 Pupils eligible for English, mathematics or science. 2 All maintained schools (including City Technology Colleges and Academies). 3 Parliamentary Constituency figures do not include pupils recently arrived from overseas. Source: National Pupil Database and Achievement and Attainment Tables (final data)
2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Sheffield, Attercliffe 2 1 1 1 0 Sheffield, Brightside 5 5 5 5 3 Sheffield Central 1 0 1 1 1 Sheffield, Hallam 0 1 1 1 1 Sheffield, Heeley 2 1 1 1 1 Sheffield, Hillsborough 1 0 1 0 0 1 Including only those open maintained mainstream schools with results published in the relevant years Achievement and attainment tables and with more than ten pupils at the end of Key Stage 4 on roll. 2 Pupils at the end of Key Stage 4. Source: Achievement and Attainment Tables (2004/05 - 2007/08 final data, 2008/09 revised data)
Sheffield, Attercliffe Sheffield, Brightside Sheffield Central Sheffield, Hallam Sheffield, Heeley Sheffield, Hillsborough 1997/98 Number of pupils 264 127 32 784 335 340 Proportion of pupils 34.3 16.2 11.2 59.1 38.2 37.8 1998/99 Number of pupils 284 110 25 746 350 349 Proportion of pupils 36.0 13.9 8.9 56.3 38.4 40.5 1999/2000 Number of pupils 281 165 42 848 367 408 Proportion of pupils 34.9 19.5 15.7 59.8 41.6 44.4 2000/01 Number of pupils 321 179 52 830 384 433 Proportion of pupils 38.8 21.1 18.7 59.7 40.5 46.1 2001/02 Number of pupils 310 211 71 854 387 463 Proportion of pupils 35.7 23.5 22.3 59.5 40.1 44.1 2002/03 Number of pupils 345 249 82 912 378 466 Proportion of pupils 38.0 26.8 24.2 64.6 38.9 44.0 2003/04 Number of pupils 406 268 97 909 428 496 Proportion of pupils 40.5 28.8 28.0 63.5 41.6 46.5 2004/05 Number of pupils 395 290 109 974 380 532 Proportion of pupils 40.3 31.5 31.7 68.3 39.0 49.2 2005/06 Number of pupils 415 311 114 961 429 560 Proportion of pupils 43.5 32.1 32.9 67.5 42.7 52.9 2006/07 Number of pupils 481 385 151 989 499 588 Proportion of pupils 49.0 38.9 41.4 67.2 48.3 55.6 2007/08 Number of pupils 566 443 165 989 531 677 Proportion of pupils 56.5 44.8 46.7 68.7 53.5 61.9 2008/09 Number of pupils 677 531 198 1043 615 678 Proportion of pupils 68.1 56.2 55.2 72.9 62.7 65.8 1 All maintained schools (including City Technology Colleges and Academies). 2 Parliamentary constituency figures do not include pupils recently arrived from overseas. 3 From 1997/98 includes GNVQ equivalences and from 2003/04 other equivalences approved for use pre-16. 4 Figures for 2004/05 onwards are based on pupils at the end of Key Stage 4. Data for previous years are based on pupils aged 15 years old at the start of the academic year. Source: National Pupil Database and Achievement and Attainment Tables (1997/98 - 2007/08 final data, 2008/09 revised data)
Pre-school Education
[holding answer 24 February 2010]: By the end of March 2010 it is expected some 20,000 two-year-olds from the most disadvantaged backgrounds will have access to a free early learning and child care place each year.
We will continue to make progress on the long-term ambition that the Prime Minister has set out to provide free part-time nursery places for all two-year-olds whose parents want them.
Decisions regarding the pace of future roll-out will need to be taken in the light of wider fiscal considerations as part of the next spending review.
Pre-school Education: Northampton
Table 1 shows the number of part-time equivalent places filled by three and four-year-olds in Northamptonshire local authority in 1997, 2001, 2005 and 2009. Data for 2010 are not yet available and will be published in the summer, so 2009 has been provided instead.
Data on the number of places available are not collected; only data on the number of places filled are available as children can access their free entitlement across different local authorities.
Part-time equivalent places are derived by counting children taking up 12 and a half hours per week as one place, 10 hours per week as 0.8 places, seven and a half hours per week as 0.6 places, five hours per week as 0.4 places and two and a half hours per week as 0.2 places.
Number of places 1997 9,700 2001 11,000 2005 14,000 2009 15,100 1 A place is equal to 12.5 hours (five sessions) and can be filled by more than one child. 2 Figures are rounded to the nearest 100. 3 Prior to 2004, information on early education places was derived from returns made by local authorities as part of the nursery education grant (NEG) data collection exercise. From 2004 onwards, information has been derived from Early Years Census and School Census data. 4 Age of all children taken at 31 December in the previous calendar year. Source: Early Years Census and School Census.
The Department publishes information on the part-time equivalent number of free early education places filled by three and four-year-olds in maintained, private, voluntary and independent providers available at:
http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000848/index.shtml
Primary Education
Information included in the answer of 11 January 2010, Official Report, columns 726-27W, was derived from new analysis of pupil attendance data submitted as part of the School Census. Attendance records are returned for each period of time spent in a relevant school in a school year.
Previous questions on this subject have not been answered substantively because an appropriate methodology had not been developed and to do so would have incurred disproportionate cost. However, a methodology based on pupil attendance data has since been developed that can be used to answer this type of question.
Pupil Exclusions: Milton Keynes
The available information requested is shown in the table.
From 2002, the Department has carried out a checking exercise to confirm the overall number of permanent exclusions. However, this only confirms the number of exclusions in each local authority area and not at school level. Therefore information for middle and upper schools is not separately identifiable.
The latest data on exclusions were published in a Statistical First Release on 30 July 2009 at:
http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000860/index.shtml
Primary1 State-funded secondary1, 3 Number of permanent exclusions Percentage of the school population4 Number of permanent exclusions Percentage of the school population4 1996/97 10 0.05 20 0.21 1997/98 — — 40 0.34 1998/99 10 0.05 10 0.12 1999/2000 20 0.09 20 0.13 2000/01 10 0.04 10 0.08 2001/02 20 0.09 30 0.20 2002/035 20 0.08 30 0.21 2003/045 20 0.07 20 0.16 2004/055 10 0.06 40 0.27 2005/065 * * 50 0.30 2006/075 10 0.05 40 0.28 2007/085 10 0.03 30 0.20 Data are as published, i.e. using the following notation: * = less than 3, or a rate based on less than 3. — = less than 5, or a rate based on less than 5. 1 Includes middle schools as deemed (upper schools are included as secondary). 2 Pupils may be counted more than once if they were registered at more than one school or moved schools during the school year. 3 State-funded secondary schools include maintained secondary schools, city technology colleges and academies. Milton Keynes local authority has no city technology colleges or academies. 4 The number of permanent exclusions expressed as a percentage of the number (headcount) of all pupils (excluding dually registered pupils) in January each year of the relevant school type. 5 Estimates based on local authority figures following a checking exercise to confirm the overall number of permanent exclusions in each local authority. Note: Figures have been rounded to the nearest 10. Source: Termly Exclusions Survey and School Census.
Schools: Admissions
(2) which local authorities which have over (a) 10 per cent. and (b) 25 per cent. surplus school places;
(3) which schools have surplus places; and how many surplus places each has.
The Department collects information from each local authority on the number of surplus places through an annual survey. The most recent published data relate to the position at January 2009 and show the breakdown of surplus places by local authority in primary and secondary schools. The data are available at:
http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/management/tsp/primarytoolkit/context/data
As requested, a copy of the data has been placed in the Libraries of both Houses.
A table showing the number of local authorities with a percentage of surplus places of 10 or above at primary level and those with a percentage of surplus of 10 or above at secondary level has also been placed in the Libraries. There are no local authorities with 25 per cent. or more surplus school places.
Schools: Consultants
The Department does not provide guidance on the use of independent consultants and investigators by either schools or local authorities in connection with school staff suspensions and disciplinary matters. The operation of disciplinary procedures, including those that may result in suspension, is a matter for local determination as are decisions on whether additional or external sources of advice and support should be engaged.
Schools: ICT
Funding for computers and information and communications technology in schools is made available predominantly via the Harnessing Technology Grant. This is paid by the Department to local authorities through the Standards Fund. The available figures on the amount of the Harnessing Technology Grant paid to the Sunderland local authority for each of the three years in the current spending period is set out in the following table:
£ 2008/09 853,603 2009/10 952,606 2010/11 1,042,241 Total 2008/2011 2,848,450
However, the harnessing technology grant will not be the total ICT spend, as schools are free to use money from other sources on technological services and infrastructure. It should also be noted that the harnessing technology grant does not include funding that is being provided to the Government's educational technology agency, Becta, in particular for the Home Access scheme (£300 million across England) which provides computers and an internet connection for eligible low income households.
Schools: Internet
[holding answer 22 March 2010]: The South-West Grid for Learning (SWGFL) has not received any funding or support from DCSF or Becta in 2009-10, other than (i) small-scale grants to help promote adoption of the Becta self-review framework by schools; and (ii) support in kind to become a Framework for ICT Technical Support (FITS) training partner. Becta personnel recently met the chief executive for SWGFL to continue discussions about an effective strategic partnership in the SW—the costs of their broadband provision to schools, and the possibility of giving schools greater choice over the range of SWGFL-provided services that they pay for were also raised.
Schools: Managers
It is for schools to determine the appropriate level of qualification and salary for a School Business Manager. However, the National College for the Leadership of Schools and Children’s Services has developed a career pathway comprising three programmes: the Certificate, the Diploma and the Advanced Diploma of School Business Management, which maps across the recently published National Association of School Business Management (NASBM) Competency Framework. There are currently 7,3621 qualified School Business Managers, with a further 3,0111 undergoing training.
Source:
1 National College for the Leadership of Schools and Children’s Services programme statistics.
Science: GCSE
[holding answer 22 February 2010]: Of pupils at the end of Key Stage 4 in 2009, in maintained schools, eligible for free school meals:
41 were entered for biology and chemistry but not physics GCSEs,
11 were entered for biology and physics but not chemistry GCSEs,
8 were entered for physics and chemistry but not biology GCSEs, and
2,911 were entered for physics, chemistry and biology GCSEs.
Comparable figures for 1997 can be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Of pupils at the end of Key Stage 4 in 2005, in maintained schools, eligible for free school meals:
60 were entered for biology and chemistry but not physics GCSEs,
12 were entered for biology and physics but not chemistry GCSEs,
6 were entered for physics and chemistry but not biology GCSEs, and
1,296 were entered for physics, chemistry and biology GCSEs.
Sixth Form Education: Admissions
The Department collects information from each local authority on the number of primary and secondary surplus school places via an annual survey.
The number of surplus places is not broken down into year groups. Local authorities provide the number of places (net capacity) for each secondary school as a whole; school sixth forms are not reported on separately because much of the space in secondary schools is shared between sixth form and other pupils.
The following table shows the number of surplus places in maintained secondary schools between 2005 and 2009 which are the most recent data available.
Secondary surplus places1 Surplus as a percentage of total secondary places 2009 309,712 9 2008 298,859 9 2007 271,175 8 2006 244,111 7 2005 227,168 7 1 Number of places relate to position as at January Source: Surplus Places Survey
The planned delivery of academy and city technology college sixth form places in academic year 2010/11 shown in the DCSF/LSC Statement of Priorities document is 37,000 compared with 25,000 in 2009/10. This increase was estimated in the autumn of 2009 using the 2009/10 funded numbers at existing academies and CTCs; the historical rate of increase in academy provision as their sixth forms grow (reflecting their role in increasing participation) to estimate the growth into 2010/11; and the average size of sixth form in maintained schools converting into academies. The major part of the increase between years is actually due to the expected conversion of up to 80 maintained schools into academies in 2010/11. The actual increase in funded places will depend on the allocations process for individual academies, which is still under way.
Special Educational Needs
[holding answer 5 February 2010]: The list of maintained primary and state funded secondary schools at which more than 50 per cent. of the pupils have statemented or non-statemented special educational needs is shown in the following table.
Pupils with special educational needs with or without statements2 Local authority name School name Headcount of pupils3 Number Percentage Maintained primary schools Hampshire Front Lawn Infant School 130 100 75.6 North East Lincolnshire Grange Junior School 160 120 73.1 Brighton and Hove Moulsecoomb Primary School 380 280 72.1 Hampshire Trosnant Junior School and BESD Unit 210 150 70.8 Brighton and Hove St. Mark's C of E Primary School 190 130 69.3 South Tyneside Laygate School 300 210 68.9 North Somerset St. Barnabas Church of England Primary School 40 30 67.6 Kirklees Ashbrow Junior School 150 100 67.5 Nottinghamshire Eastwood Junior School 90 60 65.1 Worcestershire The Fairfield Community Primary School 190 120 64.9 Kent Oak Trees Community School 160 100 64.7 Brighton and Hove Whitehawk Primary School 310 200 63.8 Kent Bysing Wood Primary School 80 50 63.8 Norfolk Howard Infant and Nursery School, King's Lynn 150 90 63.3 Wolverhampton Eastfield Junior and Infant School 170 110 62.7 City of Nottingham Highwood Player Junior School 200 130 62.7 Dudley Woodside Community School and Children's 280 170 62.6 Bradford Horton Park Primary School 210 130 62.6 Essex Crays Hill Primary School 100 60 62.1 Cheshire Lache Primary School 230 140 61.9 Hampshire South View Junior School 220 140 61.9 Waltham Forest Whittingham Community Primary School 470 290 61.0 Norfolk St. Edmund's Community Foundation School 180 110 60.6 North Yorkshire Scarborough, Braeburn Community Junior School 180 110 60.3 Kent Dame Janet Community Junior School 340 210 60.3 Kent Parkside Community Primary School 150 90 59.7 Wakefield Pontefract Willow Park Junior School 100 60 59.6 Lincolnshire Sutton Bridge Westmere Community Primary 190 110 59.5 Kent Murston Junior School 130 80 59.4 Lincolnshire Theddlethorpe Primary School 80 50 59.2 Manchester Gorton Mount Primary School 450 270 59.2 Rotherham Maltby Crags Infant School 190 110 58.5 Hampshire Meadowlands Infant School 80 50 58.4 Northamptonshire Park Junior School, Wellingborough 230 140 58.4 Greenwich Middle Park Primary School 330 190 58.3 Devon Haytor View Community Primary School 190 110 57.7 Northamptonshire Earl Spencer Primary School 190 110 57.5 Leeds Middleton Primary School 340 200 57.5 Durham St. Joseph's Roman Catholic Voluntary Aided 130 80 57.5 Portsmouth Arundel Court Junior School 230 130 57.3 Cheshire Greenfields Primary School 180 100 57.2 Islington New North Community School 410 230 57.1 Buckinghamshire Tilehouse Combined School 140 80 57.0 Warwickshire Hurley Primary School 140 80 56.9 Hillingdon Brookside Primary School 430 250 56.8 Hampshire Riders Junior School 230 130 56.8 Durham St. John's Church of England Aided Primary School 240 140 56.8 Kent Sherwood Park Community Primary School 350 200 56.7 Medway All Faiths' Children's Community School 140 80 56.6 Wigan Newton Westpark Primary School 140 80 56.4 Cumbria Ewanrigg Junior School 150 80 56.4 Southend Hamstel Junior School 470 260 56.2 Rotherham Maltby Crags Junior School 190 110 56.1 Newcastle upon Tyne Atkinson Road Primary School 330 180 55.8 Manchester St. Wilfrid's C of E Junior and Infant School 220 130 55.8 North East Lincolnshire Grange Infant and Nursery School 200 110 55.4 Blackburn with Darwen Intack Primary School 220 120 55.3 Devon Clovelly Primary School 20 10 55.0 Leicestershire Dove Bank Primary School 90 50 54.9 Northamptonshire Falconer's Hill Infant School 160 90 54.9 Hillingdon Longmead Primary School 190 110 54.9 Kent St. Ethelbert's Catholic Primary School 220 120 54.8 Redcar and Cleveland Dormanstown Primary School 250 140 54.7 Hampshire Riders Infant School 150 80 54.7 Kent St Philip Howard Catholic Primary School 140 80 54.6 City of Nottingham Huntingdon Primary and Nursery School 240 130 54.5 Derbyshire Langwith Bassett Primary School 70 40 54.4 Kent St. John's Church of England Primary School, 60 30 54.0 Durham St. Pius X Roman Catholic Voluntary Aided Pr 80 40 53.9 Wandsworth Shaftesbury Park Primary School 280 150 53.8 Stockport Bridge Hall Primary School 130 70 53.8 South Tyneside Hedworthfield Primary School 230 120 53.7 Bradford Parkland Primary School 190 100 53.7 Reading George Palmer Primary School 400 220 53.6 Wiltshire The Manor C of E VC Primary School 210 110 53.5 Buckinghamshire Hannah Ball Infant School 60 30 53.4 North Tyneside Shiremoor Primary School 390 210 53.4 Bradford Parkwood Primary School 210 110 53.4 Brighton and Hove Coombe Road Primary School 290 150 53.3 City of Nottingham Brocklewood Junior School 180 100 53.3 Bolton Top o'th'Brow Primary School 200 110 53.3 Rotherham High Greave Infant School 180 100 53.3 Havering Brookside Junior School 240 130 53.2 Medway Luton Junior School 320 170 53.1 Darlington Skerne Park Primary School 370 200 53.1 Kent Newington Community Primary School 360 190 53.1 Norfolk St. Andrew's Church of England Primary School 70 40 53.0 City of Peterborough Abbotsmede Primary School 270 140 53.0 Somerset Halcon Community Primary School 140 70 52.9 Somerset Hamp Community Junior School 210 110 52.8 Durham Woodhouse Community Primary School 200 110 52.8 Hounslow Crane Park Primary School 350 180 52.5 Devon Sticklepath Community School 300 160 52.3 Hampshire Siskin Junior School 150 80 52.3 Camden Richard Cobden Primary School 450 230 52.2 Kent Kings Farm Primary School 250 130 52.2 Reading Whitley Park Junior School 270 140 52.2 Knowsley St. Dominic's Catholic Junior School 190 100 52.2 Hampshire Chineham Park Primary School 100 50 52.0 Newcastle upon Tyne Canning Street Primary School 450 230 51.9 Wirral Fender Primary School 190 100 51.9 Lancashire Cherry Fold Community Primary School 270 140 51.9 Hampshire Trosnant Infant School 140 70 51.8 West Sussex Bewbush Community Primary 410 210 51.7 Hammersmith and Fulham Wormholt Park Primary School 440 230 51.7 Hertfordshire Sandon Junior Mixed and Infant School 90 50 51.6 Newcastle upon Tyne Thomas Walling Primary School 340 170 51.5 Hampshire Meadowlands Junior School 100 50 51.5 Kent Newlands Primary School 410 210 51.3 West Sussex Clapham and Patching C of E Primary School 40 20 51.3 Warwickshire All Saints C of E Infant School 120 60 51.3 Hampshire Front Lawn Junior School 200 100 51.2 Bexley Slade Green Infant School 240 130 51.2 Norfolk Larkman Primary School 290 150 51.2 Kent St. Mary of Charity C of E (Aided) Primary School 220 110 51.1 Doncaster Mexborough Doncaster Road Junior School 90 50 51.1 Rotherham Badsley Moor Infant School 240 120 51.1 Hampshire South View Infant School 200 100 51.0 Cumbria Newtown Community Primary School 110 50 50.9 Hampshire Siskin Infant and Nursery School 170 90 50.9 Devon Wynstream School 270 140 50.7 Southampton Mason Moor Primary School 260 130 50.6 Leeds Kippax Greenfield Primary School 170 90 50.6 Durham Tow Law Millennium Primary School 90 50 50.6 Portsmouth Paulsgrove Primary School 360 180 50.6 Cumbria Monkwray Junior School 110 60 50.5 Kent Northdown Primary School 330 170 50.5 Islington Grafton Primary School 460 230 50.4 Leeds Ebor Gardens Primary School 250 120 50.4 Thurrock Tilbury Manor Junior School 260 130 50.2 State funded secondary schools Hampshire Staunton Community Sports College 520 390 75.6 Wandsworth Southfields Community College 1,380 1,020 74.3 City of Nottingham Hadden Park High School 650 450 68.2 Salford Harrop Fold School 700 470 67.2 Leeds Cockburn College of Arts 1,050 710 67.2 Birmingham St. Albans C of E Specialist Engineering College 430 290 67.1 Sefton Litherland High School 750 490 65.0 Liverpool West Derby School 1,080 700 65.0 Newcastle upon Tyne All Saints College 850 550 64.8 Kirklees Batley Girls' High School 1,090 700 64.6 Newham Brampton Manor School 1,430 910 63.5 Kent Cheyne Middle School 460 290 62.6 City of Nottingham Fairham Community College 170 100 61.4 Medway Temple School 370 220 59.8 Islington Highbury Grove School 1,020 600 59.1 Kirklees Fartown High School 400 240 58.9 Lambeth Stockwell Park School 980 570 58.5 Wandsworth Chestnut Grove School 870 500 57.8 Torbay Torquay Community College 800 460 57.3 Bradford Nab Wood School 910 520 57.0 Greenwich Eltham Green Specialist Sports College 1,050 600 56.6 Derby Bemrose School 820 460 56.5 Lancashire Hornby High School 130 70 56.2 Kent Hartsdown Technology College 1,080 600 56.1 Wakefield Featherstone Technology College 620 340 55.9 Southampton Redbridge Community School 920 520 55.9 Kent The Mailing School 430 240 55.6 Kent Northfleet Technology College 910 500 55.6 Manchester Manchester Academy 870 480 55.4 Waltham Forest George Mitchell School 590 330 55.2 Kent Sittingbourne Community College 1,260 690 55.0 Calderdale The Ridings School 170 90 54.7 Slough Beechwood School 770 420 54.6 Sheffield Chaucer Business and Enterprise College 880 480 54.6 Northumberland Hirst High School 540 300 54.2 Brighton and Hove Falmer High School 660 350 53.9 Hampshire Park Community School 880 470 53.9 Hammersmith and Fulham Phoenix High School 840 450 53.7 City of Nottingham Haywood School 70 40 53.6 Westminster Westminster Academy 840 450 53.5 Gloucestershire Bishops' College 510 270 53.4 Southampton Chamberlayne College for the Arts 680 360 53.2 Poole Rossmore Community College 550 290 53.1 Norfolk Charles Burrell Humanities School 660 350 53.0 Southampton Oasis Academy Lord's Hill 870 460 53.0 Norfolk The Open Academy 460 250 53.0 Medway New Brompton College 990 520 52.9 Liverpool North Liverpool Academy 1,150 610 52.8 Nottinghamshire The Queen Elizabeth's (1561) Endowed School 1,080 570 52.8 Wokingham Ryeish Green School 300 160 52.8 Manchester North Manchester High School for Boys 700 370 52.6 North East Lincolnshire Oasis Academy Wintringham 750 390 52.6 Birmingham Yardleys School 900 470 52.6 Kent The North School 950 500 52.6 West Sussex Ifield Community College 1,020 530 52.5 Westminster St. George RC School 600 310 51.9 Redcar and Cleveland Saint Peter's Catholic College of Maths and Computing 420 220 51.9 Kent The Wildemesse School 510 260 51.9 Southwark Harris Academy Bermondsey 880 460 51.9 Kent New Line Learning Academy 770 400 51.8 West Sussex Thomas Bennett Community College 1,320 680 51.8 Wakefield Cathedral C of E (VC) High School 880 450 51.6 Kent Tunbridge Wells High School 340 170 51.0 Sheffield Parkwood High School 680 350 50.9 Lambeth Norwood School 700 360 50.9 Northamptonshire Weavers School 790 400 50.8 Norfolk The Hewett School 1,010 510 50.8 Trafford Stretford High School 710 360 50.8 Haringey Gladesmore Community School 1,240 630 50.7 Westminster Paddington Academy 1,130 570 50.6 Newham Kingsford Community School 1,450 730 50.4 1 Includes maintained secondary schools, city technology colleges and academies (including all-through academies). 2 Pupils with SEN without statements include school action and school action plus. 3 Excludes dually registered pupils. Note: Pupil numbers rounded to the nearest 10. Source: School Census
Specialist Schools and Academies Trust: Contracts
The Specialist Schools and Academies Trust has successfully bid for a number of contracts advertised by the Department in open competition. Details of live contracts between DCSF and SSAT are as follows.
Programme Contract period Total value of contract (£) Academies school improvement support September 2008 to August 2011 13,600,000 Curriculum Policy Delivery June 2007 to March 2010 7,451,000 Gaining Ground April 2009 to February 2011 3,572,000 Licence to Cook/Teach Food Technology April 2009 to March 2011 1,200,000 Teachers International Professional Development June 2008 to March 2011 3,306,844 Trusts Delivery1 September 2007 to August 2010 8,222,991 Work Related Learning Enterprise Policy October 2008 to March 2010 7,681,514 1 SSAT bid for this contract as part of a consortium also including the Youth Sport Trust and Foundation and Aided Schools National Foundation
Support for All: The Families and Relationships
The funding for the proposals outlined in “Support for All: the Families and Relationships Green Paper” has been allocated from current budgets.
The online eligibility checker will be taken forward next financial year and consequently no money has been spent on it to date. It is anticipated that the project will cost in the region of £100,000 and that the funding required will be allocated from the 2010-11 Affordable Childcare Campaign budget.
Sure Start Programme
There are 18 designated Sure Start Children’s Centres in the Wolverhampton city council local authority area.
Sure Start Programme: York
The 10 designated Sure Start Children’s Centres in the City of York local authority area have a combined reach of over 8,400 children under five and their families. Reach area defines those children and families with the opportunity to access children’s centres. Figures for the number of children under five and their families actually attending and using children’s centres are not collected centrally.
Teachers: Males
(2) pursuant to the answer of 14 December 2009, Official Report, column 708W, on teachers: males; how many (a) nursery and primary and (b) secondary schools with no male teachers there were in each local authority area.
[holding answer 24 February 2010]: The School Census reports that only two local authority maintained secondary schools (one in Bradford local authority and one in Hackney local authority) did not have a male teacher in service in January 2009. Both of these are girls schools with a religious character. The following table provides similar numbers for local authority maintained nursery and primary schools:
Number Schools with no male teacher in service Nursery Primary Nursery and primary England 386 3,840 4,226 Gateshead 1 13 14 Newcastle upon Tyne 6 10 16 North Tyneside 1 9 10 South Tyneside 4 8 12 Sunderland 9 16 25 Hartlepool 1 3 4 Middlesbrough 0 8 8 Redcar and Cleveland 0 8 8 Stockton-on-Tees 0 8 8 Former Durham n/a n/a n/a Darlington 2 2 4 Durham (post 1 April 1997) 10 65 75 Northumberland 1 71 72 North East 35 221 256 Cumbria 5 99 104 Former Cheshire n/a n/a n/a Cheshire (post 1 April 1998) 1 55 56 Halton 4 11 15 Warrington 1 9 10 Bolton 4 14 18 Bury 1 2 3 Manchester 2 13 15 Oldham 0 18 18 Rochdale 4 9 13 Salford 0 13 13 Stockport 9 18 27 Tameside 0 12 12 Trafford 0 10 10 Wigan 2 16 18 Former Lancashire n/a n/a n/a Lancashire (post 1 April 1998) 23 103 126 Blackburn with Darwen 9 6 15 Blackpool 0 1 1 Knowsley 0 6 6 Liverpool 4 22 26 St. Helens 1 6 7 Sefton 4 9 13 Wirral 3 12 15 North West 77 464 541 Kingston Upon Hull, City of 2 7 9 East Riding of Yorkshire 4 41 45 North East Lincolnshire 2 14 16 North Lincolnshire 0 18 18 North Yorkshire 3 89 92 York 1 2 3 Barnsley 0 20 20 Doncaster 0 17 17 Rotherham 1 23 24 Sheffield 1 17 18 Bradford 5 19 24 Calderdale 0 14 14 Kirklees 2 50 52 Leeds 0 29 29 Wakefield 3 34 37 Yorkshire and The Humber 24 394 418 Former Derbyshire n/a n/a n/a Derbyshire 8 120 128 Derby 8 22 30 Former Leicestershire n/a n/a n/a Leicestershire (post 1 April 1997) 1 45 46 Leicester 0 13 13 Rutland 0 5 5 Lincolnshire 5 69 74 Northamptonshire 9 64 73 Former Nottinghamshire n/a n/a n/a Nottinghamshire (post 1 April 1998) 2 70 72 Nottingham 1 17 18 East Midlands 34 425 459 Former Hereford and Worcester n/a n/a n/a Herefordshire 0 14 14 Worcestershire 1 53 54 Former Shropshire n/a n/a n/a Shropshire (post 1 April 1998) 0 51 51 Telford and Wrekin 1 17 18 Former Staffordshire n/a n/a n/a Staffordshire (post 1 April 1998) 5 83 88 Stoke-on-Trent 6 11 17 Warwickshire 7 48 55 Birmingham 20 26 46 Coventry 1 8 9 Dudley 1 6 7 Sandwell 0 12 12 Solihull 0 10 10 Walsall 8 11 19 Wolverhampton 7 10 17 West Midlands 57 360 417 Former Cambridgeshire n/a n/a n/a Cambridgeshire (post 1 April 1998) 6 60 66 Peterborough 1 6 7 Norfolk 3 110 113 Suffolk 1 99 100 Former Bedfordshire n/a n/a n/a Bedfordshire (post 1 April 1997) 7 75 82 Luton 4 13 17 Former Essex n/a n/a n/a Essex (post 1 April 1998) 1 138 139 Southend-on-Sea 0 5 5 Thurrock 0 12 12 Hertfordshire 15 126 141 East of England 38 644 682 London 63 221 284 Camden 1 7 8 City of London 0 0 0 Hackney 2 4 6 Hammersmith and Fulham 2 1 3 Haringey 1 8 9 Islington 0 2 2 Kensington and Chelsea 3 1 4 Lambeth 2 9 11 Lewisham 1 8 9 Newham 5 3 8 Southwark 4 2 6 Tower Hamlets 6 3 9 Wandsworth 3 7 10 Westminster 4 3 7 Inner London 34 58 92 Barking and Dagenham 0 5 5 Barnet 4 15 19 Bexley 0 16 16 Brent 3 4 7 Bromley 0 15 15 Croydon 6 17 23 Ealing 4 7 11 Enfield 0 1 1 Greenwich 4 5 9 Harrow 1 8 9 Havering 0 13 13 Hillingdon 0 10 10 Hounslow 0 7 7 Kingston upon Thames 1 7 8 Merton 0 8 8 Redbridge 0 4 4 Richmond upon Thames 1 7 8 Sutton 2 9 11 Waltham Forest 3 5 8 Outer London 29 163 192 Former Berkshire n/a n/a n/a Bracknell Forest 0 9 9 Windsor and Maidenhead 4 15 19 West Berkshire 2 26 28 Reading 5 9 14 Slough 4 4 8 Wokingham 1 14 15 Former Buckinghamshire n/a n/a n/a Buckinghamshire (post 1 April 1997) 1 59 60 Milton Keynes 2 35 37 Former East Sussex n/a n/a n/a East Sussex (post 1 April 1997) 0 36 36 Brighton and Hove 2 6 8 Former Hampshire n/a n/a n/a Hampshire (post 1 April 1997) 3 132 135 Portsmouth 1 13 14 Southampton 1 14 15 Isle of Wight 0 15 15 Former Kent n/a n/a n/a Kent (post 1 April 1998) 1 88 89 Medway 0 29 29 Oxfordshire 9 68 77 Surrey 4 127 131 West Sussex 4 53 57 South East 44 752 796 Isles of Scilly 0 0 0 Bath and North East Somerset 0 12 12 Bristol, City of 9 16 25 North Somerset 0 13 13 South Gloucestershire 0 17 17 Cornwall 2 36 38 Former Devon n/a n/a n/a Devon (post 1 April 1998) 2 52 54 Plymouth 1 4 5 Torbay 0 4 4 Former Dorset n/a n/a n/a Dorset (post 1 April 1997) 0 29 29 Poole 0 3 3 Bournemouth 0 1 1 Gloucestershire 0 45 45 Somerset 0 65 65 Former Wiltshire n/a n/a n/a Wiltshire (post 1 April 1997) 0 50 50 Swindon 0 12 12 South West 14 359 373 n/a = not applicable. Source: School Census.
Teachers: Personal Social and Health Education
The available information on PSHE teachers and their qualifications comes from an occasional sample survey which collects data on teachers by subject taught and on their post A-level qualifications. The Secondary Schools Curriculum and Staffing Survey was last carried out in 2007, and found that very few secondary school teachers of PSHE in maintained schools in England held a qualification in the subject (less than 1 per cent.). The survey asks teachers to specify post A-level qualifications (degrees, masters, PGCEs, certificates of education, HNDs, post graduate certificates and diplomas) but does not collect details of teachers Continuing Professional Development or courses that do not result in a formal post A-level qualification.
Teachers: Training
Schools already receive funding for continuing professional development for the whole school workforce, included within their delegated budgets. However, it is not ring-fenced because we believe school leaders are best placed to determine how funding should be allocated based on the needs of individual teachers, identified and agreed through the performance management process, and in the context of the school’s own development and improvement priorities.
Revenue funding per individual pupil has increased by £2,410 (83 per cent.) in real terms between 1997-98 and 2009-10, and therefore we expect that many schools will have increased their spending on CPD for teachers and other staff to reflect that.
In 2010-11 schools funding will increase by 4.3 per cent. cash per pupil and 2.1 per cent. cash per pupil over 2011-13 at current levels of inflation, after taking account of rising pupil numbers.
Truancy
In 2005/06, the School Census started to collect attendance data at individual pupil level from secondary schools only. This was extended to primary and special schools in 2006/07. The school level information collected before 2005/06 cannot be used to answer this question.
The available information on the absence rates of pupils in primary, secondary and special schools in 2006/07 and 2007/08 is published as follows:
2006/07—Table 3.2.
http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000775/index.shtml
2007/08—Table 3.2.
http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000832/index.shtml
For these tables, less than 90 per cent. attendance will equate to more than 10 per cent. absence.
Information for secondary schools only in 2005/06 is shown in the following table:
Secondary schools1,2 Pupil enrolments in schools during 2005/063 Overall absence rate: Number Percentage Percentage of overall absence4 More than 10% 803,990 26.3 62.6 Total 3,056,330 100.0 100.0 1 Includes middle schools as deemed. 2 Includes maintained secondary schools, city technology colleges and academies (including all-through academies). 3 Number of pupil enrolments in schools from start of the school year up until 27 May 2006. Includes pupils on the school roll for at least one session who are aged between five and 15, excluding boarders. Some pupils may be counted more than once (if they moved schools during the school year or are registered in more than one school). 4 The number of sessions missed due to overall absence by pupils with more than 10 per cent. absence expressed as a percentage of the total number of sessions missed due to overall absence. Note: Totals may not appear to equal the sum of the component parts because numbers have been rounded to the nearest 10.
Overall absence in 2007/08 stood at 6.29 per cent. the lowest on record, having fallen for eight of the last 10 years. On average 70,000 more pupils were in school each day in 2007/08 than would be the case if absence rates were still at the level of 1996/97.
Persistent absence in secondary schools accounts for 27.6 per cent. of all overall absence. Schools and local authorities now have to target ‘persistent absentees’. During 2008/09 the Department targeted, through National Strategies, 360 secondary schools, with high levels of persistent absence located within 42 local authorities. Collectively, these 360 schools reduced in 2008/09 their persistently absent pupils by 18 per cent. from the end of spring term 2008 to the end of spring term 2009. This shows our policies are working well and recognises the hard work taking place in schools and local authorities.