Skip to main content

Lords Chamber

Volume 62: debated on Wednesday 18 November 1925

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

House Of Lords

Wednesday, 18th November, 1925.

The House met at a quarter before four of the clock, The LORD CHANCELLOR on the Woolsack.

Lord Bishop Of Oxford

Thomas Banks, Lord Bishop of Oxford—Was (in the usual manner) introduced.

Public Health (Scotland) Amendment Bill

Brought from the Commons, read 1a , and to be printed.

Business Of The House

My Lords, perhaps you will allow me to make an explanation and also an apology to your Lordships. I had hoped that it would have been possible to have taken the Criminal Justice Bill to-morrow but, contrary to expectation—at least to my expectation—that Bill did not get through another place on Monday and has not got through yet. Therefore that part of our programme has become impossible. Your Lordships have just given a First Reading to the Public Health (Scotland) Amendment Bill, which will be available for discussion to -morrow, and I propose that the arrangement which has been made shall be maintained so far as that Bill is concerned.

There is some hope, though it is not very great, that the Tithe Bill will pass the House of Commons in the course of tomorrow's sitting. In that event and considering how short a time we have available, I should wish to give a First Reading to that Bill as early as possible and I would ask the House to have a formal sitting on Friday in order to receive the Tithe Bill. That would enable the Government to maintain the programme I had foreshadowed and to ask your Lordships to read the Tithe Bill a second time on Thursday of next week, thus giving almost a week's interval between its introduction and the Second Reading. Should the Tithe Bill pass the House of Commons to-morrow, therefore, I shall ask your Lordships to have a formal sitting on Friday. Should it not pass the House of Commons then there will be no sitting of your Lordships' House on Friday.

Tuesday of next week is allotted to a debate on Locarno, on Wednesday a debate is to be raised by the noble Lord, Lord Parmoor, on the subject of the League of Nations, and on Thursday—on the assumption I have just made—there will be the Tithe Bill. If that does not pass the House of Commons to-morrow then some other arrangement will have to be made, but your Lordships must, I think, have sufficient notice of that Bill. There is also the Expiring Laws Bill, for which I have not allocated a day it can be put in almost anywhere because I do not think it is likely in your Lordships' House to lead to any long discussion. The noble and learned Lord, Lord Carson, informs me that he is not able to bring on the Moneylenders Bill as soon as he had hoped to do because the Government Amendments are not ready. That is not his fault—perhaps, vicariously, it is my fault—but he will have to determine on what day he will take that Bill in consequence of the delay. There remains the Criminal Justice Bill. It is hoped that this will get through the House of Commons by Friday of this week, but I must confer with the Lord Chancellor before I assign a day for that measure.

My Lords, may I ask what business we have on Thursday, that is to-morrow, besides the Public Health (Scotland) Amendment Bill?

The only other business is a Question by the noble Marquess, Lord Lincolnshire.

It is obvious that whenever we try to predict the course of business in this House so far as it is dependent on what is to happen in the other place we are building on shifting sands. The event has proved this, but I do not think we can complain of the gallant attempt the noble Marquess has made to predict something for us. We shall get along, but I do not think that we shall have very much business to do between now and about the end of next week.

House adjourned at four o'clock.

From Minutes Of November 18

Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire And Huntingdonshire Electricity Bill Hl

The CHAIRMAN OF COMMITTEES informed the House that the opposition to the Bill was withdrawn. The Orders made on the 24th of February last and on Monday last discharged, and Bill committed for to-morrow.

Gas Regulation Act, 1920, Special Orders

Draft of a Special Order proposed to be made by the Board of Trade under Section 10 of the Gas Regulation Act, 1920, on the application of the Mayor, aldermen and burgesses of the Borough of Port Talbot:

Draft of a Special Order proposed to be made by the Board of Trade under Section 10 of the Gas Regulation Act, 1920, on the application of the Hornsey Gas Company:

Draft of a Special Order proposed to be made by the Board of Trade under Section 10 of the Gas Regulation Act, 1920, on the application of the Mayor, aldermen and burgesses of the Borough of Leigh:

Draft of a Special Order proposed to be made by the Board of Trade under Section 10 of the Gas Regulation Act, 1920, on the application of the Lea Bridge District Gas Company:

Laid before the House (pursuant to Act) and referred to the Special Orders Committee.

Electricity Special Order

Special Order made by the Electricity Commissioners, and confirmed by the Minister of Transport under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1919, in respect of an arrangement made in pursuance of Section 19 of that Act between the Mayor, aldermen and burgesses of the Borough of Dover and the Folkestone Electricity Supply Company, Limited:

Laid before the House (pursuant to Act) and referred to the Special Orders Committee.

Moneylenders Bill Hl

Committee of the Whole House (on re-commitment) put off sine die.