Written Answers
Eec Commission: British Representation
asked Her Majesty's Government:How many "British" places in the Commission of the EEC are vacant; and why.
The Commission is responsible for recruitment of its staff and the Commission Staff Regulations do not permit posts to be reserved for a particular Member State. In terms of numbers the United Kingdom has approximtely the right level of representation in the most senior grades, though we are less well represented in some of the lower grades.
Take-Home Pay
asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will list in the
Official Report the real weekly take-home pay of a married man with two children under 11 with earnings at the lowest decile for each year since 1964.
The figures are as follows:
| Real weekly take-home pay (including family allowance or child benefit) at lower decile, at 1977–78 prices£ | |
| 1964–65 | 36·40 |
| 1965–66 | 37·70 |
| 1966–67 | 39·80 |
| 1967–68 | 39·90 |
| 1968–69 | 40·10 |
| 1969–70 | 39·90 |
| 1970–71 | 41·00 |
| 1971–72 | 41·80 |
| 1972–73 | 44·20 |
| 1973–74 | 44·10 |
| 1974–75 | 43·20 |
| 1975–76 | 42·50 |
| 1976–77 | 43·30 |
| 1977–78 | 44·10 |
For years up to 1974 it has been assumed that the employee was not contracted out of the graduated pension scheme.
High Seas Closures
asked Her Majesty's Government:What areas of the high seas have been closed to international shipping because of rocket and other weapon tests in recent years, by which States, and for how long, and whether such closing of the high seas would be in accordance with either Article 88 or Article 89 of the Composite Negotiating Text (CNT) now before the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS III).
Many States, including the United Kingdom, have in recent years engaged in rocket and other weapon tests on the high seas. In British practice the tests are suspended if a vessel enters the range. This does not constitute a claim to close an area of the high seas and would not contravene Articles 88 and 89 of the ICNT. In an earlier period when nuclear weapon tests were being conducted in the Pacific in areas comparatively little used for navigation, the States concerned took various measures to ensure that navigation was not endangered.
The Continental Shelf: Military Equipment
asked Her Majesty's Government:What are now their rights in international law in relation to
prima facie military equipment it may find installed on the British Continental Shelf or within the waters of the British fishery zone.
Where such equipment interfered with the rights enjoyed by the United Kingdom in its Continental Shelf and in its fishery zone the United Kingdom is entitled to ensure respect for its rights.
Foreign Offshore Platforms
asked Her Majesty's Government:Within what distance of the shores of the United Kingdom would the Composite Negotiating Text permit foreign Governments to establish permanent or temporary platforms for purposes other than economic exploration or exploitation (
a) on the surface and ( b) within the body of the waters.
Provided that such a platform did not affect the exercise of the rights of the coastal State or of other States and their legitimate uses of the sea, this appears to be lawful anywhere outside the territorial sea of the United Kingdom.
Offshore Installations: Shipping Infringements
asked Her Majesty's Government:What types of vessels, and how many of them Soviet or Warsaw Pact vessels, have entered the safety zones set up round British oil and gas installations, and what steps have Her Majesty's Government taken on such occasions.
Since 1969 about two-thirds of vessels reported to have entered safety zones around offshore installations on the United Kingdom Continental Shelf were fishing vessels, and the remainder were other commercial or military vessels. There have been 294 reported infringements, of which 24 have been by Soviet or East European vessels. Minor safety zone infringements by foreign vessels have been brought to the attention to the Government of the flag State, with a request to rebuke the owner or master. Similar action is taken by the Department of Trade for United Kingdom registered vessels. Serious infringements have been the subject of formal diplomatic protests to the appropriate Governments.
Soviet Exercises And Weapon Tests
asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether Soviet vessels have conducted exercises or weapon tests or scientific research within the area of the present British fishery zone or over the British Continental Shelf and, if so, when and for how long and, in the case of research, for what purpose.
It is not possible to know whether Soviet vessels on the high seas within our fishery zone or over the Continental Shelf may have been engaging in exercises or weapon tests. As to scientific research, the United Kingdom recognises in general freedom of research on the high seas, including its fishery zones unless it is research concerning the Continental Shelf and conducted there. Comprehensive information is not available therefore as to what research has been undertaken within the area of the present fishery zone or over its Continental Shelf.
Oil And Gas Installations: Security
asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the Ministry of Defence is or is not asked at an early stage to comment on the defensibility against terrorist or enemy attack of new designs for oil and gas extraction installations and for pipeline systems.
The Ministry of Defence is not consulted on the design of individual platforms or pipeline systems but its general views on their vulnerability have been taken into account.
Soviet Fishing Vessels: Surveillance
asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether Soviet or East European fishing vessels, when they are licensed to fish in British waters, are entitled to engage in electronic and other forms of surveillance of British oil and gas installations and their related pipelines, or to carry equipment which could be used to interfere with their communications systems.
The use of electronic and visual equipment during navigation on the high seas is permitted even if this makes possible the observation of installations and other vessels. Use of electronic equipment on vessels deliberately to cause interference with other vessels or installations using their own channels of communications is not lawful.
Soviet Research In United Kingdom Waters
asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the Soviet Union has conducted fishery or any other research within the present area of the British fishery zone or on or over the British Continental Shelf that required permission from the British authorities and, if so, for what period and with what British participation.
The United Kingdom recognises in general freedom of research on the High Seas, including its fishery zone, unless it is research concerning the Continental Shelf and conducted there. Comprehensive information is not available therefore as to what research has been undertaken within the area of the present fishery zone or over its Continental Shelf. Much of the fishery research is conducted under the auspices of ICES so that the results become available to the British authorities.
Soviet Zones: United Kingdom Research
asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the United Kingdom has conducted or sought to conduct any research in zones or areas subject to Soviet jurisdiction and on how many occasions has permission not been forthcoming.
The United Kingdom has not recently sought to conduct research in zones subject to Soviet jurisdiction.
Soviet Waters: Free Transit
asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the Soviet Union has undertaken in the context of the UNCLOS negotiations to allow the régime of free transit to operate in any straits within 12 nautical miles of the Soviet Union, and if so in which.
Her Majesty's Government have not discussed this question with the Soviet Union but see no reason to believe that the Soviet Union would not carry out its obligations if it became a party to the prepared new Law of the Sea Convention.
Innocent Passage Of Vessels: Permission
asked Her Majesty's Government:In the territorial seas of which States do naval vessels engaged in innocent passage have to obtain prior permission and submarines have to travel on the surface.
The 1958 Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone provides that ships of all states including warships shall enjoy the right of innocent passage through the territorial sea. The Informal Composite Negotiating Text of the United Nations Law of the Sea Conference adopts a similar approach. As a party to the 1958 Convention, Her Majesty's Government take the view that there is no basis in international law for requesting prior authorisation or notification to the coastal State of the intended passage of warships through the territorial sea and have reserved their rights accordingly. According to information available to Her Majesty's Government, the following States have enacted legislation purporting to require prior notification of the transit of warships through territorial waters:
| Country | Year of enactment |
| Honduras | 1935 |
| Dominican Republic | 1951 |
| Soviet Union | 1960 |
| China | 1963 |
| Denmark | 1968(1) |
| Libya | 1973(2) |
| Dominican Republic | 1974 |
| Bangladesh | 1976 |
| India | 1976 |
| Sudan | 1976 |
| Sri Lanka | 1976 |
| Denmark | 1976(3) |
| Pakistan | 1976 |
| Barbados | 1977 |
| Seychelles | 1977 |
| Mauritius | 1977 |
| PDRY | 1977 |
Innocent Passage Of Vessels: Suspension
asked Her Majesty's Government:In the territorial seas of which States has "innocent passage" been suspended, and for how long, and how often.
According to information held by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and the Ministry of Defence, on 1st August 1977, North Korean authorities announced the establishment of a military zone up to 50 miles out to sea off the East coast of Korea, and up to 200 miles off its West coast. All foreign naval vessels and military aircraft are reportedly banned from the zone. It appears that nonmilitary ships may only use the zone with prior permission. In 1967 the Government of India declared the territorial waters of the Union Territory of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands closed to all foreign shipping.
Whitby: Potash Extraction
asked Her Majesty's Government:
This Question presumably relates to the application by Whitby Potash Limited to extract potash by a solution mining method from land underlying the North Yorkshire Moors National Park in the vicinity of Whitby and to erect a refinery in Whitby itself which is not in the National Park. Planning permission for this development was refused by the National Park Committee and the company has appealed to my right honourable friend the Secretary of State for the Environment against the refusal. An inquiry into the appeal is due to commence on 7th February.
The answers to the noble Lord's specific points are:
| Building | Height | Ground Area |
| Administration Block | 12 storeys | 135 ft. × 43 ft. |
| Staff Block | single storey | 6,000 sq. ft. |
| Laboratory | 16 ft. | 3,600 sq. ft. |
| Process Building | 100 ft. | 22,000 sq. ft. |
| Loading Tower | 135 ft. | 3,600 sq. ft. |
| Storage Building | 85 ft. | 116,800 sq. ft. |
| 3 substations and one pumphouse | not given | 1,075 sq. ft. total |
I am sending the noble Lord copies of the pre-inquiry statements mace by the company at the Secretary of State's request and by the North Yorkshire County Council.
Legislation: Implementation
asked Her Majesty's Government:In respect of those Public Acts which received the Royal Assent between March 1974 and 31st December 1976, which (
a) Acts or ( b) sections of Acts are not yet in force.
I understand that no central record is kept and this information could only be compiled at disproportionate cost.House adjourned at twenty-six minutes before eight o'clock.