Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 395: debated on Monday 17 July 1978

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

The Seveso Disaster

  • (i) what contributions have been made to the costs of research and assistance into the effects of dioxin poisoning by the Commission of the EEC since the original vote of 160,500 units of account in March 1977;
  • (ii) What is the estimated total cost to public funds to date of such research and assistance;
  • (iii) whether the third screening of children below ten years of age planned by the specially constituted chloracne panel organised by the Health and Safety Directorate of the Commission of the EEC has been completed and with what results;
  • (iv) whether the construction of a special incinerator to destroy the soil has been completed and what results have been obtained in the attempts to detoxicate Zone A;
  • (v) whether it is now accepted as reported in The Times on 19th February 1977 that some 70,000 tons of material will he burned over a period of about three years; and
  • (vi) whether it is accepted as true as stated in The Times of 6th May 1978 that some 5,000 claims for compensation have been lodged and that it is claimed that the facts already known include "nearly 350 ill or deformed children" an increase in miscarriages and tumours of the liver in humans and of sterility in livestock.
  • In March 1977 the Commission of the EEC agreed to contribute 160,500 units of account to the costs of research and assistance into the effects of dioxin poisoning. This represented 26 per cent. of the total cost of a programme of 15 research studies, of which about two-thirds have been completed. Subsequently the Commission authorised an additional contribution of 40,000 units of account, 27 per cent. of the total costs, for the continuance of one of these studies related to contamination mapping. The United Kingdom contributes to the Community Budget as a whole rather than to individual parts. One share of the 1977 Community Budget was 19.24 per cent.Her Majesty's Government have received no report, as yet, of the screening panel to which my noble friend refers. It is understood that the programme of screening tests approval by the panel is being carried out under contract by an Italian specialist. We are told that work is proceeding, that a report is expected shortly and that the panel will than be reconvened to study the results. We understand that construction of the special incinerator has not been completed. Two of the seven sub-areas into which Zone A was divided are understood to have been detoxicated.It appears that little progress has been made on the pilot project for burning

    material and it is impossible to give precise figures of the amount of material to be burned. Her Majesty's Government have no detailed information which would enable us to confirm the facts and figures given in

    The Times report of 6th May 1978.

    Voluntary Organisations And Government Aid

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will list the national voluntary organisations grant-aided by central Government in the current financial year, showing the amounts of grant and the sponsoring Department in each case; whether they will show the total grant aid made available by each central Government Department direct to local voluntary bodies; and whether they will give comparative figures for the previous two financial years.

    The total grants approved by central Government Departments (other than the Department of Education and Science, for which information could be provided only at disproportionate cost) are shown below.

    1976–771977–781978–79
    National voluntary organisations19,587,47125,423,90927,090,076
    Local voluntary bodies3,467,4514,138,1084,094,855
    The figures for 1978–79 are not final since in many cases grants are still under consideration.The figures do not include grants made under the Job Creation Programme, nor those made to housing associations or through other centrally administered services such as the Supplementary Benefits Commission.I will write to the noble Lord with fuller details.

    Social Security: Abuse Of Benefits

    Whether they will update the table on page 51 of the Committee of Abuse on Social Security Benefits and detail the sum for each benefit which has been fraudulently claimed.

    As forecast in paragraph 154 of the report, a uniform basis for the analysis of net losses was instituted from the 1972–73 financial year. The table below is derived from that revised form of analysis and also includes benefits which have been introduced subsequently. It cannot therefore be compared with the figures which were originally given for 1971–72.

    1976–77 Irrecoverable overpayments of benefits recorded during the year
    Total £Fraud on the part of the claimant or other person not being a servant of the Department £
    Family benefits415,96752,518
    Unemployment benefit2,133,726432,521
    Sickness and invalidity benefit2,137,618361,396
    Maternity benefit46,6286,718
    Widow's benefit266,274108,726
    Retirement pension550,64350,934
    Industrial injury201,83616.981
    Others169,2974,682
    Supplementary benefit8,031,7822,170,907
    Total13,953,7713,205,383

    It should be noted that these are net losses (that is gross losses less any amounts which have been repaid) and that figures of the sums which were initially found to have been obtained by fraud are not available from central records.

    International Planned Parenthood Federation

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How much money has been given to the International Planned Parenthood Federation since its incorporation in this country; for what purposes these grants have been authorised; and how such expenditure is monitored.

    £1·5 million has been paid from aid funds to the International Planned Parenthood Federation since its incorporation in July 1977. The purpose is to provide general support for the Federation's activities in promoting family planning in developing countries, mainly through local family planning associations.

    Monitoring of the expenditure is through scrutiny of the Federation's annual audited accounts and examination of the Federation's annual report to donors, which is considered at an Annual Donors Meeting.

    House adjourned at two minutes past nine o'clock.