Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 425: debated on Wednesday 25 November 1981

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

Single Student Maintenance Awards

asked Her Majesty's Government:What was the maintenance award for a single student outside London other than at Oxford and Cambridge for each year since 1962; and what was the value of the award for each year in real terms as a percentage of the value in (a) 1962 and (b) 1978.

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health and Social Security
(Lord Elton)

The information requested is as follows:

Percentage Value in real terms (2)
Ordinary Maintenance Grant (1) £September 1962=100September 1978=100
1962–63320100110
1963–6432098108
1964–6532094104
1965–6634096105
1966–6734092101
1967–6834091100
1968–6936091100
1969–703608695
1970–713808594
1971–724308897
1972–734458594
1973–744858593
1974–756059099
1975–767408797
1976–778759099
1977–781,0109099
1978–791,10091100
1979–801,2458897
1980–811,4308896
1981–821,5358493
(1) For an undergraduate student living in hall or lodgings, other than London, Oxford and Cambridge.
(2) Percentage change in grant divided by percentage change in the Retail Price Index (RPI).

Student Minimum Grant Award

asked Her Majesty's Government:How many students would be affected were the £410 minimum grant award to be abolished.

It is estimated that some 35,000 students in Great Britain now receive the minimum grant.

Parental Means Test: Cost Of Abolition

asked Her Majesty's Government:What would be the cost of abolishing the parental means test on:

  • (a) mandatory awards.
  • (b) all student awards.
  • In 1979–80 in Great Britain the total amounts would have been £95 million for mandatory awards and £104 million for all student awards.

    Student Mandatory Awards And Parental Means Test

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What percentage of students who receive mandatory awards are affected by the parental means test.

    Sixty-one per cent. of students in Great Britain who receive full-value mandatory or discretionary awards have parents in respect of whom a parental contribution is assessed. Information is not available for mandatory awards separately.

    Parental Means Test: Cost To Parents

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the total cost to parents of the parental means test and what is the average payment made by parents.

    The assessed contribution towards student maintenance from parents, students and spouses in Great Britain was £104 million in the academic year 1979–80. Information on the average payments actually made by parents, students and spouses in not available.

    Student Maintenance Awards: Government Assessments

    asked Her Majesty's Government:To what extent the Government attempt to assess student needs when calculating an increase in student maintenance awards.

    It is usual for the calculation of mandatory student awards for maintenance to take account of movements in students' living costs. In recent years, however, Her Majesty's Government have also had regard to their overall policy of restraining public expenditure.

    Open University Funding

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Why they have not yet decided on the amount of funding for the Open University for the calendar year 1982; how they would advise the university to calculate fees to be charged to students for that year, and what percentage increase this would represent on 1981 and 1980 respectively.

    Decisions on the Open University's grant must be taken in the context of public expenditure generally. The university has been informed that the 1982 grant will be assessed on the basis that tuition fees will be £120 per full credit course, an increase of 22.4 per cent. on the 1981 fees (£8) and 79.1 per cent. on those of 1980 (£67).

    Import Controls

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is their latest assessment of the desirability of import controls.

    The United Kingdom is more economically dependent on overseas trade in terms of the proportion of total output we export than any other major industrial nation in the world. It would not be in the United Kingdom's interests therefore for the Government to put up general barriers against imports which would restrict consumer choice, deprive manufacturers of essential supplies of components and raw materials and above all invite retaliation from our trading partners. At the same time, however, the Government arc, and always have been, prepared to consider recourse to protective measures against imports in certain special circumstances, when such measures are consistent with our international obligations. The firm line the Government are taking in the current international discussions on the problem of low-cost textile imports is evidence of our pragmatic approach to this difficult area of trade policy.

    The Wimborne By-Pass

    asked Her Majesty's Government:

  • (i) Whether the Wimborne By-pass is intended to be part of the Folkestone-Honiton road;
  • (ii) how long ahead of schedule Robert McAlpine were able to complete the by-pass for public use;
  • (iii) whether the cost was within the tendered price.
  • The Wimborne By-pass forms part of the Folkestone-Honiton trunk road. The contractor is Sir Alfred McAlpine & Son (Southern) Ltd., and the by-pass was opened to traffic on 25th September, some six months ahead of schedule. Some work is still outstanding and until it is completed the final cost will not be known. It is not, however, expected to exceed the tender price, suitably adjusted to allow for inflation.

    Northern Ireland: Interim Reports On Education

  • (i) indicate whether it is the case that the Interim Report of the Higher Education Review Group for Northern Ireland (Chairman, Sir Henry Chilver) on The Future Structure of Teacher Education in Northern Ireland presents projections in Tables 4.1 and 4.2 of the likely school populations in various age groups up to the year 1995, and that these projections were based on the Government Actuary's Department's January 1978 population estimates;
  • (ii) present revised estimates of the data in the tables referred to in the light of the most recent population projection of the Government Actuary's Department; and,
  • (iii) specify in what ways this affects the estimates in the Chilver interim Report of teacher requirements in Northern Ireland.
  • 1. Tables 4.1 and 4.2 of the Interim Report of the Higher Education Review Group for Northern Ireland give projections of the likely school populations in various age groups and by school sector up to the year 1995. These projections were based on the Government Actuary's Department, January 1978 population projections.2. The most recent estimates are based on the Government Actuary's Department January 1980

    Thousands
    Age Croups198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995
    Aged under 34·04·24·24·34·34·64·95·25·55·86·16·47·07·07·3
    419·519·520·322·122·722·823·423·924·424·825·325·625·926·026·0
    524·924·824·324·726·626·726·927·528·128·629·229·830·230·631·0
    626·224·924·824·124·626·526·626·827·428·028·629·129·730·130·5
    727·426·024·524·624·124·526·426·526·627·327·828·429·029·630·0
    827·927·426·024·724·624·124·526·326·426·627·227·828·328·929·5
    928·727·827·425·924·724·524·024·426·326·426·627·227·828·428·9
    1028·928·627·827·325·824·624·423·724·226·226·326·427·127·728·2
    1129·328·828·527·727·125·724·324·223·724·126·126·226·326·927·5
    1229·729·128·628·227·526·925·524·224·123·623·925·926·026·126·7
    1330·129·629·128·528·127·326·725·424·023·923·423·825·725·926·0
    1429·829·829·328·628·127·727·126·525·123·823·723·223·625·525·7
    1528·127·827·927·526·926·426·125·424·823·422·222·121·722·023·8
    1616·717·317·517·917·617·216·916·616·215·815·014·214·213·914·1
    177·78·08·08·08·38·18·07·87·77·57·36·96·66·66·4
    183·33·53·73·83·83·83·73·73·63·53·43·43·23·03·0
    Aged 19 and over0·30·30·30·30·30·30·30·30·30·30·30·30·30·20·2
    Total362·5357·4352·0348·2345·0341·9339·8338·7338·7340·0342·8347·0352·7358·6365·1
    PUPILS IN SCHOOLS AS AT JANUARY OF EACH YEAR, BY SCHOOL TYPES
    Thousands
    198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995
    Nursery Sector6·26·56·56·66·67·07·47·08·38·79·09·410·010·010·3
    Primary Sector194·3189·4185·3183·4182·8182·8184·5187·3191·2195·7199·7203·0206·7210·2213·3
    Secondary Sector159·5159·0157·8155·8153·3149·8145·6141·3137·0133·4131·8132·4133·7136·1139·1
    Special Schools2·52·42·42·32·32·32·22·22·22·22·22·22·32·32·4
    All pupils362·5357·4352·0348·2345·0341·9339·8338·7338·7340·0342·8347·0352·7358·6365·1
    Column totals may be subject to rounding error.

    Social Security Benefits: Take-Up

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will make a statement on the measures employed or planned to encourage take-up of social security benefits, either generally or in respect of particular benefits or particular groups of beneficiaries; and whether they are satisfied with the results already achieved or anticipated as the result of planned improvements in information and advice.

    I am glad to assure the noble Lord that the take-up of most of the very wide range of social security benefits for which the Department of Health and Social Security has responsibility is satisfactory. In so far as the take-up of any of the major contributory benefits, or child benefit, falls short of 100 per cent., it is likely that this is due more to deliberate choice than to ignorance. The significant problems of unsatisfactory population projections. Revised estimates of the data in Tables 4.1 and 4.2 of the Interim Report are set out in the tables below.3. The revised school population projections reach their nadir in the late 1980's, when they are about 6 per cent. above those shown in the Chilver Interim Report. Using the criteria in the Chilver Interim Report on pupil/teacher ratios the number of teaching posts would also be assumed to rise by about 6 per cent. on the levels set out in the report.take-up lie mainly with supplementary benefit, one parent benefit, family income supplement and, to a lesser extent, with attendance allowance and mobility allowance.The take-up of supplementary benefit runs at about three-quarters in terms of numbers of actual and potential claimants but at about five-sixths in terms of benefit. This reflects the fact that, while a large sum in total may be unclaimed (estimated at over £300 million), many of the individual amounts are small. Nevertheless, the Government regard the encouragement of take-up as important if need is to be adequately met. A number of measures have been in force for some time: posters are displayed at the department's local offices, unemployment benefit offices, post offices,

    et cetera; all retirement pensioners and widows are invited to claim, and retirement pension order books contain a claim form; unemployed claimants are given a leaflet drawing their attention to supplementary benefit; and leaflets dealing with other benefits also refer to it and, when any

    of these benefits is disallowed or reduced, claimants are advised that they may be eligible.

    More recently, the reforms of the supplementary benefit scheme introduced in 1980 have made a contribution, both by the emphasis they place on legally defined entitlement and by the following specific measures: the issue of a written notice to all claimants showing how their benefit is worked out; a programme of improvement and simplification of leaflets; and the issue of the revised Supplementary Benefits Handbook (to be revised again early next year) and the forthcoming publication of the S Manual.

    The take-up of one parent benefit has shown a modest improvement. About two-thirds of the lone parents who stand to gain by claiming the benefit are now doing so, compared with about three-fifths previously. The level of take-up is, however, still unsatisfactory and additional measures have been taken or are contemplated. For example, the maternity benefit claim form can now be used to indicate whether there is a wish to claim one parent benefit; lone parents who cease to be entitled to supplementary benefit are given a one parent benefit claim form and advised to claim; and the Child Benefit Centre at Washington sends a letter drawing attention to one parent benefit whenever a person who appears to be a lone parent claims child benefit. Similarly, local authority social workers, health service personnel and voluntary organisations have been asked to bring the availability of the benefit to the attention of lone parents with whom they have contact.

    Starting this month, a note about one parent benefit will be sent to all new recipients of child benefit. In March 1982, the note will be replaced by a new page in the child benefit order book. This will advertise, pictorially, one parent benefit on one side and family income supplement on the other. Over the ten weeks beginning on 18th January 1982, a letter about one parent benefit will be sent to some 300,000 people who have a child benefit order book in one name only but are not claiming one parent benefit. Family income supplement (FIS) will also be mentioned in this letter.

    The latest information about the take-up of FIS has been derived from the Family Finances Survey. This was conducted between October 1978 and September 1979. It showed that, at that time, just over half of those families who were thought to be eligible were taking up FIS. Since last year's uprating, the average weekly intake of claims has increased by almost one-third. It is hoped that this indicates some improvement in the level of take-up.

    The department already does a great deal to stimulate take-up of FIS, such as handing out leaflets, displaying posters, and issuing claim forms, e.g. to recipients of supplementary benefit who are about to resume work. Two new leaflets—for low paid workers and lone parents—will feature FIS and one parent benefit prominently. FIS is also the subject of a major press and television campaign every year, coinciding with the uprating. The department is stepping up the campaign this year; it will cost £476,000, an increase of £140,000 over 1980. Some of the increase is due to inflation. There is, however, a considerable increase in real terms. This will be used for additional television advertising, including the London area, which has not been possible in earlier years.

    There is no means of measuring precisely the national shortfall in claims for attendance allowance or mobility allowance but local studies have suggested that some disabled people have failed to appreciate that they may be entitled to them. I am glad to say that there has been some progress as a result of the International Year of Disabled People and the numbers claiming these allowances are increasing steadily.

    These modest advances in the levels of take-up of the benefits on which there are significant problems are encouraging. There is still, however, a long way to go and the department will continue its efforts to improve on the traditional methods of publicity, as well as to develop new methods. Take-up is also high on the priority list of the Social Security Advisory Committee, which has been taking a particular interest in information and advice arrangements. The Government welcomes this and the contribution which local authorities, voluntary organisations and welfare rights workers make to the promotion of take-up; particular encouragement is given to the development of well-targeted take-up campaigns, provided these are devised in close consultation with local social security offices and so as to avoid raising the expectations of claimants fruitlessly.

    House adjourned at twenty-nine minutes before nine o'clock.