Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 428: debated on Monday 8 March 1982

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

Refugees From Eastern Europe

asked Her Majesty's Government:How many refugees from Eastern European countries have been admitted to the United Kingdom during the lsst two decades.

Detailed statistics on the numbers of persons granted asylum in the United Kingdom have been maintained only since 1979. According to our records the figures for 1979, 1980 and 1981 were as follows:

197919801981
Bulgaria353
Czechoslovakia222821
Hungary182810
Poland8812
Rumania21410
U.S.S.R174
Total549060
The only other figures available show that an estimated 2,200 Czechs came here in 1968 following the Russian invasion of Czechoslovakia.

Immigration Act 1971: Deportation

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will state, for each of the years the Immigration Act 1971 came into force:

  • (i) how many recommendations for deportation were made by courts;
  • (ii) how many recommendations for deportation made by courts resulted in deportation orders being made;
  • (iii) how many deportation orders were made (a) under section 3(5)(a), (b) section 3(5)(b) and (c) 3(5)(c);
  • (iv) how many appeals against deportation orders were lodged, dismissed or successful;
  • (v) how many deportation orders were made on the grounds that a person's presence was not "conducive to the public good as being in the interests of national security or of the relations between the United Kingdom and any other country or for other reasons of a political nature".
  • The information requested in parts (i), (ii) and (iii) of the Question is given in Table I below. Information about appeals in respect of deportation orders (Part (iv) of the Question) has been provided by the Immigration Appellate Authorities and is given in Table II and III below. I regret that the information requested in part (v) is not reedily available.IMMIGRATION ACT 1971(

    entered into force 1 st January 1973)

    TABLE I

    Year

    Number of recommendations for deportation made by courts

    Number of deportation orders made following a court recommendation

    Number of deportation orders signed in respect of persons liable to deportation under section: 3(5)(a), 3(5)(b), 3(5)(c)

    19736774034319
    1974638284116261
    197587536114044
    19761,19055619736
    19771,175688403588
    1978980551619577
    19791,0756265441023
    19801,2428071,5539715
    19818207011,3451406

    Notes:

    The total number of deportations effected in any year, following a court recommendation, will not necessarily be the same as the number of recommendations made. Some recommendations are not implemented, and some deportations effected in one year may be the result of a recommendation made in the previous year.

    TABLE II

    Appeals to adjudicators against decisions to deport under Section3(5) of the Immigration Act 1971

    Year

    Total number of appeals referred

    Dismissed

    Allowed

    1973124544
    197420414912
    19752521548
    19764342892
    197753341615
    19785244616
    197942635518
    198042731027
    198126225719

    TABLE III

    Appeals at first instance to the Immigration Appeal Tribunal against decisions to deport under Section 3(5) of the Immigration Act 1971, and appeals to the Tribunal against adjudicators' determinations of appeals against such decisions.

    Year

    Total number of cases referred

    Dismissed

    Allowed

    197316102
    197438192
    197526313
    197660226
    197760522
    197897666
    1979136999
    19801336810
    1981998013

    Notes:

  • (i) The figures for appeals to adjudicators relate to appeals by individuals, whereas the figures for appeals to the tribunal relate to appeal cases (where one case may involve more than one appeal).
  • (ii) Appeals against decisions to make deportation orders under Section 3(5)(b) or (c) of the 1971 Act are to the tribunal at first instance. Appeals against decisions under Section 3(5)(a) of the 1971 Act are to adjudicators at first instance unless a related appeal against a decision under Section 3(5)(b) or (c) is pending before the tribunal.
  • (iii) Separate figures for appeals to the tribunal at first instance and appeals to the tribunal against adjudicators' determinations could not be obtained without disproportionate effort.
  • India Office Library And Records: Collections

    asked her Majesty's Government:What arrangements they propose for the future safeguarding of the collections in the India Office Library and Records.

    The India Office Library and Records is a department in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. It includes the records of the East India Company and the India Office since the former's foundation in 1600. Its present accommodation is approved by the Lord Chancellor as a place of deposit of public records in accordance with Section 4(i) of the Public Records Act 1958. In order that these valuable collections may be managed in association with one of the world's great research libraries, Her Majesty's Government have agreed to a proposal that with effect from 1st April 1982 they should be deposited with the British Library, to be held on trust by the British Library Board. The board welcomes this proposal, and sees the collections as a major enhancement of the British Library's own internationally famous resources. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office and the British Library Board have agreed the following arrangements for this deposit:"(i) The printed books, documents and objects for which the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs is responsible, which are at present in or in the care of the India Office Library and Records and which relate to those countries and territories which at any time before 15th August 1947 came within the area of interest at any given time of the India Office and the East India Company (hereinafter referred to as "the Collections") will be deposited by the Secretary of State with the British Library Board to be held by the Board on trust for the Secretary of State, who will retain the beneficial title to the Collections. However, privately owned items on loan to the India Office Library and Records, and records in or in the care of the India Office Library and Records and withheld from public inspection in accordance with the Public Records Act 1958 and 1967, are excluded from these arrangements.(ii) The Board will preserve and maintain the Collections and provide public access to them in so far as resources granted to it by Parliament permit.(iii) The Board will provide the Secretary of State with an annual report on the Collections.(iv) The Secretary of State may, upon giving due notice in writing to the Board, withdraw from the Board that part of the Collections which was in the possession of the India Office on 15th August 1947, and the Board will maintain the identity of this material against such an eventuality. Upon the withdrawal of the material, it will cease to be held by the Board on trust for the Secretary of State.(v) In the event of such a withdrawal the Secretary of State will meet all costs related to the withdrawal including redundancy payments to members of staff if necessary, while the Board may, at its own expense and subject to any applicable provisions of the law of copyright, make copies of the items to be withdrawn.(vi) The necessary instruments to give effect to these heads of agreement will be drawn up as soon as possible, and will enter into force on a date to be mutually agreed".The staff of the India Office Library and Records will be offered contracts in the employ of the British Library on terms and conditions similar to those they have at present. There will be no change in the availability of the collecting to the students, scholars and ordinary readers from many countries who have hitherto made use of them.

    El Salvador: Election Observers

    "Whether they have decided to send observers to report on conditions in the forthcoming election in El Salvador; whether, if so, this does not in effect endorse an election repudiated by Catholics, social democrats and many Christian democrats in addition to Marxists as necessarily unrepresentative in circumstances of a civil war: and whether they support the alternative of a negotiated settlement between the opposing forces.

    The noble Lord may have seen from my reply to the noble Lord, Lord Windlesham, on 17th February (Official Report, col. 640) that Her Majesty's Government have decided to send observers to the forthcoming election in El Salvador. It will be for the observers to say how far the elections are representative.We do not rule out the possibility of a negotiated settlement, nor do we consider it to be excluded by the decision to hold elections. However, the El Salvador Government and opposition elements have not so far reached a mutually acceptable basis for negotiations.

    Global Negotiations: New Delhi Conference Request

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What response has been given to the request by the Delhi Conference representing 44 developing countries that new efforts be made to launch global negotiations between developing and industrialised nations in view of the failure of the Cancun Conference to make arrangements for such negotiations.

    We endorse the call by the participants at the New Delhi Conference for renewed efforts to start global negotiations. Since the Cancun Summit, which provided the initial impetus to resume preparations, we and our Community partners have been seeking to persuade all concerned to launch global negotiations on mutually agreed terms. We shall continue to do so.

    East Timor

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether, in view of the evidence of continued conflict and heavy loss of life in East Timor six years after Indonesia's annexation, they will ask the UN Security Council to press for negotiations and freedom of choice by the inhabitants.

    No. We do not believe that such a course would contribute to the settlement of this question which is primarily a matter for the Governments of Portugal and Indonesia.

    Nature Conservation Circular: Revision

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they intend to revise Department of the Environment Circular 108/77

    Nature Conservation and Planning in view of the recent enactment of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, and whether they will ensure that all internal drainage boards receive copies of the circular.

    The Earl of Avon: The need to review existing departmental circulars will be considered when the Wildlife and Countryside Act has been fully implemented. In the meantime, we shall consider more specifically whether there is a need to issue Department of the Environment Circular 108/77 Nature Conservation and Planning to internal drainage boards as part of the guidance on the new duties of water authorities and internal drainage boards under the Act. The guidance is currently being prepared by officials of my department and the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in consultation with interested parties.

    Swans: Lead Poisoning

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they accept the findings and recommendations of the Nature Conservancy Council's report on lead poisoning in swans, and, if so:

  • (a) who will be responsible for implementing the phased withdrawal of split-lead-shot and lead weights within the next five years; and
  • (b) whether they will monitor the success or otherwise of any action adopted to reduce the level of swan mortality caused by split-lead-shot and fishing weights, and what resources will they make available for this purpose.
  • The Government have welcomed the Nature Conservancy Council's report on lead poisoning in swans. The report looks to the possibility of split-lead-shot being phased out on a voluntary basis. The Government have already been greatly encouraged by the constructive attitude to the report shown by the angling community, especially towards publicity for the excellent code prepared by the National Anglers' Council. It will be for the Nature Conservancy Council to monitor progress and to meet its resource needs for this from within the funds voted by Parliament.

    Nature Conservancy Council: Grant-In-Aid

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will state at 1982–83 prices by how much the Nature Conservancy Council requested its grant in aid be increased for 1982–83.

    As I indicated in my reply to the noble Lord on 11th February, the NCC asked for its grant-in-aid to be increased by between £950,000 and £1,130,000 at 1981–82 prices. At 1982–83 prices this would have represented an increase of approximately £1,025,000 to £1,220,000.

    Wild Birds: Protection Areas

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they have put forward a list of protection areas for wild birds as required by the EEC Council Resolution of 2nd April 1979 on the implementation of Directive 79/409/EEC on the conservation of wild birds, and if so, what areas have been included in their list.

    The following 19 sites have been included in a list put forward in response to the Resolution; they are sites covered by the Ramsar Convention. The Government are now considering what further sites to notify.

    Hectares
    Cors Fochno and Dyfi (Powys, Dyfed and Gwynedd)2,497
    Bridgwater Bay (Somerset)2,703
    Bure Marshes (Ranworth, Cockshoot and Hoveton Great Broads, and Woodbast-wick Marshes (Nofolk)412
    Hickling Broad and Horsey Mere (Norfolk)892
    Lindisfarne (Northumberland)3,123
    Loch Druidibeg, Loch a 'Maccair and Loch Stilligary (Western Isles)1,780
    Loch Leven (Tayside)1,597
    Loch Lomond (Central and Strathclyde)253
    Lough Neagh and Lough Beg (Northern Ireland)39,500
    Minsmere-Walberswick (Suffolk)1,697
    North Norfolk Coast (Scolt Head, Holk-ham, Blakeney Point and Cley-Salthouse Marshes) (Norfolk)5,559
    Ouse Washes (Norfolk and Cambridge-shire)2,276
    Rannoch Moor (Tayside and Strathclyde)1,499
    Cairngorm Lochs (Grampian and High-land)179
    Loch Lintrathan (Tayside)218
    Claish Moss (Highland)563
    Silver Flowe (Dumfries and Galloway)608
    Abberton Reservoir (Essex)1,228
    Rostherne Mere (Cheshire County)79

    Housing Authorities: North Wiltshire Scheme

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many housing authorities in England and Wales are making use of the "North Wiltshire Scheme" for securing short-term lettings of houses; and how many dwellings were used in this way at the most recent date known.

    Irish Republic: Uk Educational Qualifications

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether all United Kingdom academic and technical qualifications are recognised in the Republic of Ireland and vice-versa, and if not, why not; and whether they will list those qualifications that are not mutually recognised.

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health and Social Security
    (Lord Elton)

    In the United Kingdom it is for Government and the autonomous educational institutions, professional and other bodies concerned to decide on the acceptability of foreign qualifications for their purposes. Similar principles apply to the recognition of technical qualifications. Though the question of recognition of British qualifications in the Republic of Ireland is a matter for the authorities concerned, in the case of academic qualifications both countries are signatories of the Council of Europe's 1953 Convention on the Equivalence of Diplomas Leading to Admission to Universities (Cmnd 9168) and of the 1959 Convention of the Academic Recognition of University Qualifications (Cmnd 1591). No record of qualifications so recognised is maintained, but in 1979 the Commission of the European Community published a study which suggests that the principles of these two conventions are generally followed by the responsible bodies in both countries.House adjourned at twenty-nine minutes before ten o'clock.