Written Answers
Wandsworth: Refuse Collection
asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they consider that the privatisation of refuse collection in Wandsworth has failed; whether they are aware of the allegations that rubbish has been uncollected for weeks and of bribery in Wandsworth in this connection; and whether they will call on local authorities to abandon privatisation and return to principles of public service.
:Certainly not; the Government are firmly of the view that local authorities do well to examine the scope for savings and better service in contracting out their waste services. The ratepayers of Wandsworth stand to benefit from estimated savings of some £7.5 million over the next five years as a result of this move. I understand that the contract is just finishing its running-in period; the problems encountered have been exaggerated and no more than transitional; complaints are already markedly reduced. Allegations of bribery are for investigation locally, but my right honourable friend the Secretary of State for the Environment is not aware of any substantiated ones. A prime principle for public services is that they be provided in the most cost effective and efficient manner. The encouragement, not the abandonment, of ways of achieving this is one essential part of this principle.
Wandsworth: Registered Disabled Persons
asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the percentage of persons registered as disabled in Wandsworth has declined from 2.68 in 1977 to 1.06 in 1979; what are the reasons for the decline; whether the real proportion of disabled persons is estimated as being in excess of 5 per cent., and what action are the Government taking to encourage registration.
Returns made to the department by The London Borough of Wandsworth show that the numbers of registered disabled people in the general classes were as follows:
- 1977—6,294
- 1978—7,153
- 1979—7,506
- 1980—7,800
- 1981—8,190
This shows a rise in the numbers registered as a percentage of the estimated population of Wandsworth from 2.2 per cent. in 1977 to 2.7 per cent. in 1979 and 3.0 per cent. in 1981. The national average in 1981 was 2 per cent.
No estimate of the total number of physically disabled people is available. Returns from the registers are known to underestimate the prevalence of disability in the population, but registration is voluntary and it is for individuals to decide whether they wish to apply to be registered.
Cancer: Screening Programmes
asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the National Health Service policy and programme for screening for cervical cancer; and what is their screening programme for breast cancer.
There is a well-established programme of cervical screening, which aims to reduce mortality from cervical cancer by regular screening of women at greatest risk. Present policy lays emphasis on the screening every five years of the priority group of women aged 35 and over and those who have been pregnant on three or more occasions.The Committee on Gynaecological Cytology, who advise the Government on these matters, have recently reviewed this policy and reaffirmed the continuing emphasis on the screening of older women. Screening facilities are provided by general practitioners, family planning, ante-natal and other clinics. The screening programme is supported by arrangements for recalling women in the priority group. These are currently operated centrally by the NHS Central Register. The recall scheme has also been reviewed and found to be ineffective; we have therefore asked health authorities to provide alternative local arrangements by 1st April 1983.The Government are spending £0.6 million a year on major trials designed to establish the efficacy of breast cancer screening. The trials involve a quarter of a million women between the ages of 45 and 65. They are designed to assess the practicability and efficacy of screening by mammography and clinical examination and to assess the feasibility of education in self-examination as an alternative method of early diagnosis. The trials of mammography and clinical examination are taking place in Guildford and Edinburgh: the self-examination trials in Huddersfield and Nottingham. Four centres have been established, in Avon, Dundee, Oxford and Stoke-on-Trent, to provide comparative information on unscreened populations. Studies of the psychological effects of early diagnosis programmes, of the radiation dose from mammography and of the costs of screening and education in self-examination are included in the research programme. The programme will continue until 1987 with follow-up of the study population until 1997. Preliminary results should begin to become available by 1986. The Government will consider the future development of breast cancer screening in the light of the results of the trials.