Written Answers
Princes Risborough Laboratory: Transfer Savings
asked Her Majesty's Government:What is their estimate of the savings attributable to the closure of the Princes Risborough Laboratory after deducting the costs of transfer to Garston.
The closure of the Princes Risborough Laboratory and the transfer of its functions and staff to Garston has been estimated to cost a total of £4·4 million, covering design and provision of new facilities, relocation of equipment and staff and an allowance for lost research time. The savings estimated are £1·5 million related to the sale of the site and £350,000 per year in maintenance and running costs and support staff costs. Discounting these figures at 5 per cent. over 60 years gives a net saving of £2·9 million.
Tolls: Estuarial Crossings
asked Her Majesty's Government:On what basis it is decided that some estuarial river crossings should be tolled while others and all inland crossings are toll free; and whether they are giving consideration to this anomaly with a view to abolishing all such tolls.
Successive Governments have followed the principle that tolls should be charged on estuarial crossings which are exceptionally expensive to construct, and which offer exceptional advantages to their users, as compared with alternative routes. In every case the specific approval of Parliament is required, as it was for the older toll bridges which are still in existence throughout the country. Tolls are limited by statute to levels which will cover the full costs of the structure, including operating costs and interest charges, over a specified period. The arrangement enables substantial additions to be made to the transport infrastructure, and paid for by those who use them. The Government are not considering the abolition of tolls.
Organ Transplantation: Code Of Practice
asked Her Majesty's Government:When the revised
Code of Practice on Organ Transplantation will be made available.
We are today issuing a revised Code of Practice for doctors for organ transplantation including guidance on diagnosis of brain death. The code revises the original code published in 1979 and was prepared by a working party chaired by Lord Smith, of Marlow. It is for use by medical, nursing and administrative staff concerned with organ transplantation. We hope the new version will resolve any doubts about procedures and the requirements of the law. Our main object, of course, is to ensure that we can treat as many patients as possible who need transplants of kidneys, corneas or other organs and that no unnecessary confusion or hesitation reduces the supply of donor organs.The present position of kidney transplants is particularly serious. Last year there were over 1,000 transplant operations but the supply of kidneys for transplantation is only about half that necessary. The waiting list has now reached 2,263. Many more members of the public are carrying organ donor cards and we are doing everything possible to encourage the carrying of cards. But one of the reasons for the continuing shortage of organs for transplants is hesitancy on the part of hospital staff to identify potential donors among their dying patients and uncertainty about the procedures that must be followed to lead to transplantation. We believe the code is clear, helpful and sensitive and should increase the supply of organs for transplantation, particularly kidneys.The revised code emphasises the care with which relatives of a deceased person should be interviewed to establish their views. The need to maintain confidentiality is brought out more strongly. It suggests that the person who makes the approach should be senior and have experience of personal interviews of a sensitive nature. Any approaches should be made with proper sensitivity and a feeling for the relative's distress.Approaches to the parents of a dead child need a particuarly high standard of sensitivity and tact. The law does not demand parental consent but it should always be obtained in the case of a child.We hope that the section which deals with diagnosis of death and brain death in particular will put an end to controversy on this difficult subject. A television programme nearly two years ago led to widespread public alarm on the subject and set back the kidney transplant programme substantially. The diagnosis of brain death is based on the up-to-date and considered view of the Conference of Medical Royal Colleges and their Faculties in the United Kingdom, who confirm their previous criteria for diagnosis which is backed by every leading professional in the field. The diagnosis is to be carried out by a combination of experienced doctors who are not to be members of the transplant team and who will carry out a series of tests and repeat them after a suitable interval. As the conference recommended, a new check list is being introduced to facilitate the proper recording of the test results in the case notes. There is not the slightest chance, when the code is followed, that organs will be removed for transplantation from someone who is not dead in every sensible meaning of the term. It is a tragedy that fears of that kind have cost us hundreds of operations that might have returned patients to happy and full lives.We hope the code will, therefore, accelerate the steady growth of the transplant programme. One thousand patients in one year is a new record and a significant landmark to have passed. We need to do much better than that, however, and we need the full support of the public and the professions to help us go much further.
Traditional Urban Programme Circular 23: Approved Projects
asked Her Majesty's Government:What was the number and total value of the projects approved under the Traditional Urban Programme Circular 23.
Four hundred and seventy-four projects worth 18·10 million have been approved. I am arranging for copies of the list giving details of all the approved projects by the local authority to be placed in the Library.