Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 445: debated on Tuesday 29 November 1983

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

Probation Students: Home Office Sponsorship

asked Her Majesty's Government:What policy they adopt when applicants for Home Office sponsorship for the Certificate of Qualification in Social Work have been convicted of imprisonable offences, and whether all such cases are referred to Ministers.

:Applicants for Home Office sponsorships as probation students are considered on their individual merits. Where there had been a previous conviction, all the relevant circumstances would be taken into account but it would not be an automatic bar to acceptance, though the suitability of an applicant who had a serious or recent conviction would obviously be very much in question. The way in which such cases are considered in the Home Office depends on the circumstances of each individual case.

Deportees: Detention In Prison

asked Her Majesty's Government:What was the number of persons detained in prisons following a non-custodial sentence and a recommendation for deportation by the courts in 1981 and 1982 respectively; and in each case what was the average length of time for which those persons were so detained.

It is estimated that about 150 people were received into prison department establishments in England and Wales in both 1981 and 1982 for detention under the Immigration Act 1971 following a non-custodial sentence and a recommendation for deportation by the courts. In both years the average period of detention of such persons was about eight weeks.

Serious And Violent Offenders: Release

asked Her Majesty's Government:What changes in the criteria for granting parole and release on licence respectively have been decided by the Home Office; and whether it is their intention to implement these without seeking the approval of Parliament; andWhat are the "new measures" introduced by the Home Secretary, in relation to serious and violent offenders, which he said in his speech to the Boards of Visitors' annual meeting on October 24th "would inevitably have an impact on prisons"; and whether they intend to seek the approval of Parliament for them.

I would ask the noble Lord to await the further statement promised in the reply given by my noble friend Lady Trumpington to the noble Lord, Lord Morris, on 14th November [Official Report, col. 1143].

Albany Prison Disturbance: Criminal Charges

asked Her Majesty's Government:What action they propose to take concerning those prisoners who were charged with prison disciplinary offences following the disturbances at HM Prison, Albany last May in the light of the recent Divisional Court judgment in

Tarrant's case.

We are determined that every effort should be made to ensure that those responsible for the disturbance at Albany face the legal consequences of their actions. We do not, however, think that it would be right to expect the Board of Visitors to proceed with the highly complex issues raised by the outstanding charges of mutiny considered in the light of the judgment in the Divisional Court on 8th November. My right honourable and learned friend has accordingly decided to set aside the disciplinary awards made by the board in respect of offences committed during the disturbance, and he is asking the Chief Constable of Hampshire to investigate any criminal offences which may have been committed during the disturbance which took place at Albany on 19th–25th May.

International Competitiveness: Unit Labour Costs

asked Her Majesty's Government:

  • (i)What is the statistical basis of the statement by the Lord Gray of Contin on 2nd November 1983 (col. 568) that "between 1975 and 1981 our international competitiveness, measured in terms of relative unit labour costs, fell by no less than 55 per cent., while that of, for example, France and Germany was steadily rising".
  • (ii)Whether they will provide a breakdown of these figures into separate relevant years and continue them for 1982 and 1983, and
  • (iii)Whether they will provide similar information for the USA and Japan in addition to France and Germany.
  • :The most widely used measures of international price competitiveness, on which I based my statement, are the indices of relative labour costs per unit of manufacturing output, adjusted for exchange rate changes, which are compiled and published by the International Monetary Fund. These indices are 'normalised' to allow for cyclically-induced differences between countries. The following table gives the indices for the period 1975 to 1983 Q2 for the countries in question. An increase in the cost indices shows a decline in international competitiveness.

    RELATIVE NORMAL UNIT LABOUR COSTS IN MANUFACTURING 1980=100

    UK

    France

    Germany

    USA

    Japan

    197574·1100·593·6107·1108·6
    197668·899·594·4111·9106·7
    197765·997·299·7109·5113·0
    197870·094·6103·3101·0128·7
    197980·998·1104·298·8111·9
    1980100·0100·0100·0100·0100·0
    1981107·892·889·0114·8113·0
    1982104·688·989·2128·7104·1
    1981Q1115·494·589·0106·8116·1
    Q2109·692·089·0114·6113·4
    Q3103·792·387·2121·0112·4
    Q4102·492·690·9116·7110·2
    1982Q1104·992·087·4122·2108·8
    Q2104·692·288·6126·3104·5
    Q3105·185·789·6132·1101·1
    Q4102·785·791·6134·0101·9
    1983Q192·988·689·8132·9111·8
    Q298·683·989·0135·7110·0

    Source: 1MF

    From this table, it can be calculated that between 1975 and 1981 Q1 the United Kingdom's international competitiveness declined by 55 per cent. Over the same period, cost competitiveness in France improved by 6 per cent. and by 5 per cent. in Germany; USA's competitiveness was unchanged; and Japan's deteriorated by 7 per cent. Since then. United Kingdom competitiveness has recovered by 15 per cent.; in France competitiveness has improved by a further 11 per cent.; German competitiveness is unchanged; USA's competitiveness has deteriorated by 27 per cent.; and Japan's has improved by 5 per cent. By their nature, these indices give equal weight to movements in the exchange rate, earnings and productivity. This means that short-term movements in the indices are likely to be dominated by exchange rate changes, while long-term trends are more likely to be influenced by the trend in productivity.

    Metropolitan County Councils: Abolition

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will indicate to which bodies the powers of the metropolitan county councils will be entrusted after 31st March 1986 if legislation to transfer their functions to other bodies is not approved in Parliament after the 1985 elections have been cancelled.

    The powers would remain with the metropolitan county councils. The legislation to cancel the 1985 elections will not abolish these councils, but it will provide for their membership to consist of councillors appointed by the district councils. Provision will also be made for the reinstatement of direct elections to the county councils if Parliament should reject the Government's subsequent legislation to abolish these councils.

    Free School Meals

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the minimum statutory service which has to be provided for those pupils in receipt of free school meals provision.

    The duty placed on local education authorities in England and Wales and on education authorities in Scotland is, as specified in the Acts, to make such midday provision for free meal recipients as appears to them to be requisite. The standard of provision required of the Education and Library Boards in Northern Ireland is specified in regulations.

    Medical Deputising Services

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they are satisfied that the guidelines issued by the DHSS are sufficiently known and understood by those general practitioners who monitor, and also those who use, agency services for night and weekend home visits to patients.

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health and Social Security
    (Lord Glenarthur)

    Copies of the guidance circular and code of practice were issued to all family practitioner committees and local medical committees, whose responsibility it is to make their contents known to general medical practitioners and professional advisory committees. We are considering our policy on the monitoring of deputising services, including the extent to which that guidance should be revised and reissued.

    Deportations In 1981 And 1982

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many deportation notices were signed by the Secretary of State for the Home Department in 1981 and 1982 respectively, grouped according to the countries of origin of those concerned.

    The following information is available on notices of intention to deport. which are signed by officials acting on behalf of the Secretary of State for the Home Department, and on deportation orders, which are signed by the Secretary of State for the Home Department or, in his absence, by another Principal Secretary of State.

    TABLE 1 NOTICES OF INTENTION TO DEPORT ISSUED
    United Kingdom 1981–82Number of notices

    Country

    19811982

    Country

    19811982

    Country

    19811982
    Algeria1512Indonesia12Portugal510
    Australia98Iran6580Saudi Arabia1
    Bangladesh2617Iraq1210Senegal1
    Barbados31Ireland1614Seychelles41
    Belgium21Israel77Sierra Leone2726
    Benin2Italy43Singapore76
    Brazil33Ivory Coast11Somalia1
    Brunei1Jamaica1720South Africa57
    Cameroons11Japan21Spain810
    Canada84Jordan61Sri Lanka4565
    Chile2Kenya714Sudan28
    China1Korea1Swaziland1
    Colombia3431Lebanon75Sweden1
    Cuba1Liberia2Switzerland11
    Cyprus112108Libya54Syria12
    Dominican Republic1Madagascar1Tanzania1017
    Ecuador1Malaysia2225Thailand1624
    Egypt6670Malta76Tonga1
    Fiji4Mauritius4230Trinidad and Tobago46
    France32Mexico11Tunisia13
    Gambia45Montserrat1Turkey5166
    Germany (Federal Republic)54Morocco712Uganda33
    Ghana148179Netherlands31USA1113
    Greece12New Zealand31Venezuela21
    Grenada15Nigeria206218West Indies Associated States1314
    Guyana1213Pakistan145177Yemen31
    Haiti1Panama1Yugoslavia42
    Hong Kong3836Peru34Zambia24
    Hungary11Philippines310Zimbabwe2220
    India115135Poland1710Stateless2
    Total1,4861,610

    TABLE 2 DEPORTATION ORDERS MADE
    United Kingdom 1981–82Number of orders

    Country

    19811982

    Country

    19811982

    Country

    19811982
    Algeria2323Greece13Peru43
    Antigua1Grenada43Philippines74
    Argentina4Guyana2115Poland1812
    Australia179Hong Kong2456Portugal116
    Austria41Hungary2Qatar1
    Bahamas1India129138Saudi Arabia6
    Bahrain1Indonesia42Senegal21
    Bangladesh2122Iran9866Seychelles35
    Barbados42Iraq137Sierra Leone3036
    Belgium73Irish Republic3631Singapore86
    Belize1Israel1610South Africa105
    Benin11Italy2319Spain159
    Bolivia32Ivory Coast23Sri Lanka4869
    Brazil56Jamaica2710St. Vincent1
    Brunei1Japan41Sudan7
    Burma1Jordan94Swaziland2
    Cameroons11Kenya1714Sweden2
    Canada157Korea1Switzerland11
    Cape Verde1Kuwait3Syria6
    Chile63Lebanon88Tanzania1215
    China25Liberia2Thailand2015
    Colombia6034Libya136Tonga1
    Costa Rica1Madagascar1Trinidad and Tobago1015
    Cyprus157129Malawi1Tunisia28
    Denmark22Malaysia2432Turkey8177
    Djibouti1Malta89Uganda86
    Dominican Republic2Mauritius5549USA2422
    Ecuador41Mexico11Uruguay1
    Egypt7547Morocco912Venezuela41
    Fiji14Nepal1West Indies Associated States913
    Finland1Netherlands81Yemen32
    France1610New Zealand72Yugoslavia33
    Gambia54Nicaragua1Zaire1
    Germany (Federal Republic)1812Nigeria318332Zambia28
    Ghana277291Norway4Zimbabwe1917
    Gibraltar1Pakistan197149Stateless31
    Panama1
    Total2,1951,986

    The Business Expansion Scheme And Farming

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether it is true that any investment made in a farm business is ineligible for tax relief under the Business Expansion Scheme should that person decide to work on, or manage the farm; and, if so, whether such a regulation encourages absentee farmers and landowners to the detriment of the rural scene.

    The Business Expansion Scheme provides a generous tax incentive for individual outside investors in unquoted trading companies rather than people putting money into their own company. In this way it focuses directly on the needs of new and expanding businesses for additional sources of equity. However, relief is not given if investors have more than 30 per cent. of the business. There is therefore no encouragement for an outsider to take control of a farming or any other business.

    Farm Tenancies

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether in their view the possibility of the inheritance of farm tenancies by two generations after the original tenant under the Agriculture (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976 offends against the rule against perpetuities.

    Succession under the 1976 Act is not certain since the agricultural land tribunal can decide that an applicant is not eligible or suitable. The succession provisions of the Agriculture (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976 do not, therefore, offend against the rule against perpetuities, as modified by the Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 1964.

    Signal Crayfish: Escapes

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they agree that it would be an offence under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 for the operator of a crayfish farm carelessly or negligently to allow a signal crayfish (

    pacifasticus leniusculus) to escape unless they had a licence issued under the Act permitting the release of signal crayfish into the wild.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many crayfish farms stocked with the signal crayfish (

    pacifasticus leniusculus) currently operate in the United Kingdom, whether they will state the location of each and the length of time each has been in operation, and whether they will state which of these farms has succeeded in preventing any escape of the signal crayfish to the wild.

    So far as Her Majesty's Government are aware, no records are maintained relating to the information requested.

    Uk Wheat Production Levels

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What was the total level of United Kingdom wheat production in 1970, 1975, 1980 and 1982.

    The information requested is as follows:

    YearUnited Kingdom Wheat Production
    ('000 tonnes)
    19704,236
    19754,488
    19808,472
    198210,316

    Agricultural Arbitrators: Appointment By Rics

    asked Her Majesty's Government:In how many cases in each of the last five years for which figures are available has the President of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors been required to appoint arbitrators in accordance with paragraph 28 of Schedule 6 to the Agricultural Holdings Act 1948.

    In the last five years the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors have made the following appointment of arbitrators under paragraph 28 of the Sixth Schedule to the Agricultural Holdings Act 1948:

    Calendar Year
    19799
    198015
    198130
    198216
    1983 (to date)34

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will quantify the savings they expect to make arising from the transfer to the President of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors of the responsibility for the appointment of arbitrators under Clause 7 of the Agricultural Holdings Bill at present before this House in terms of departmental manpower and public expenditure.

    We anticipate a saving of approximately four man-years and some £63,000 of public expenditure