Written Answers
Bbc And Itv: Anti-Competitive Practices
asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether, in elaboration of their reply to Baroness Burton of Coventry's Starred Question of 28th November (cols. 969/970) they will inform the House of the action taken on the five suggestions put forward by the Monopolies and Mergers Commission, in their report entitled
The British Broadcasting Corporation and Independent Television Publications Limited published in September 1985, and the progress made on discussions with the broadcasting organisations arising from the Government press notice dated 11th September 1985.
We wrote to the BBC and IBA on 17th October drawing their attention to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission's view that the present arrangements for providing information about forthcoming programmes on BBC and IBA services were not necessarily the best that could be devised, and sought their views on the five points mentioned in the commission's report. The BBC and Independent Television Publications Limited (ITP) subsequently replied that these matters were to be considered by the board of the BBC and by the directors of ITP (respectively) and that they would write to us again after these deliberations. We shall write to the noble Baroness when we have more information. It should be noted in connection with one of the five items mentioned by the commission—the desirability of the annual profits from sales of the Radio Times and TV Times being published—that in respect of the former this practice has now been adopted by the BBC in its accounts for 1984–85 published on 28th November.
Shotgun Licence Fees
asked Her Majesty's Government:Pursuant to the Answers given by Lord Elton on 5th December 1984 (
Official Report, col. 1436) and Lord Glenarthur on 9th July 1985 ( Official Report, col. 182) when they propose to publish the results of their review of shotgun licence fees.
We are considering the outcome of the review of firearms fees and hope to be in a position to publish the results in the new year.
Shotgun Licence Fee Scheme: Cost
asked Her Majesty's Government:When an analysis was last conducted in police forces of the cost of administering the shotgun licence fee scheme; and what was the estimated net cost of administering the system.
A costings exercise was conducted in sample police forces in December 1981. The net cost of administering the shotgun certificate system in Great Britain in 1981–82 was then estimated to be £567,986. The costing method for the current review of firearms fees is based on the recommended certification procedures set out in the 1984 report of the joint Home Office/Association of Chief Police Officers Working Party on the Administration of the Firearms Act 1968, a copy of which has been placed in the Library.
Prisoners: Suicide And Self-Wounding Statistics
asked Her Majesty's Government:How many suicides and serious self-inflicted wounds there have been in prisons, borstals and detention centres in each of the last five years for which figures are available; and whether they will break-down the figures between types of institution, long and short sentences, and between the various jurisdictions of the United Kingdom, also expressing suicides and serious wounds as a percentage of total prisoners in each category.
The available information is as follows:
| Suicides | |||
| Prisons and Remand Centres | |||
| Year | Sentenced inmates | Unsentenced and civil inmates | |
| Over 4 years | Over 18 months up to and including 4 years | Up to and including 18 months | |
| 1980 7 (0.11%) | 2 (0.02%) | 0 | 12 (0.19%) |
| 1981 4 (0.7%) | 2 (0.02%) | 1 (0.01%) | 8 (0.11%) |
| 1982 6 (0.11%) | 1 (0.01%) | 1 (0.01%) | 9 (0.12%) |
| 1983 1 (0.02%) | 7 (0.08%) | 3 (0.03%) | 9*(0.12%) |
| 1984 6 (0.10%) | 3 (0.03%) | 1 (0.01%) | 13*(0.14%) |
| *Including in each year one prisoner who died in outside hospital as a result of a suicide attempt made before his reception into prison custody. | |||
Borstals
- 1980 0
- 1981 1 (0.02%)
- 1982 1 (0.02%)
- 1983 3 (0.02%)
Youth Custody and Detention Centres
Nil in the period 1980–1984.
Figures in brackets represent the number of suicides expressed as a percentage of the average number of inmates in the category for the year.
Self inflicted wounds
| ||
| Number of occasions of non-fatal self injury: | ||
| 1980 | 1,878 (4.46%) | |
| 1981 | 1,885 (4.35%) | |
| 1982 | 1,410 (3.23%) | |
| 1983 | Prisons and remand centres | 1,009 (2.87%) |
| Youth custody centres and borstals | 378 (5.70%) | |
| Detention centres | 22 (1.29%) | |
| 1984 | Prisons and remand centres | 1,266 (3.59%) |
| Youth custody centres | 425 (6.23%) | |
| Detention centres | 26 (1.75%) | |
Figures for 1980–1982 are for all categories of establishment.
Figures for each category for these years are not available.
Figures in brackets represent the number of self-inflicted wounds expressed as a percentage of the average number of inmates in the category for the year.
The above figures include all self inflicted wounds, minor and serious. Figures for serious wounds only are not available.
Wild Bird Special Protection Areas In Scotland: Statistics
asked Her Majesty's Government:What percentage of the sites identified by the Nature Conservancy Council in Great Britain, which merit designation as special protection areas under EC directive 79/409 on the conservation of wild birds, are in Scotland; and what percentage of all these sites that are currently threatened by development proposals or approved developments are in Scotland.
60.4 per cent. of the sites identified by the Nature Conservancy Council as meeting the criteria for designation as special protection areas under EC Directive 79/409 on the conservation of wild birds, and 62.5 per cent. of the sites in which the council has identified development proposals or approved developments, are in Scotland.
Duich Moss: Possible Infringement Of Planning Consent
asked Her Majesty's Government:What other actual or possible infringements of the consent conditions attached to the planning permission allowing the draining and peat cutting on part of Duich Moss on Islay have been reported to them, apart from the large drainage ditch illegally dug by Scottish Malt Distillers into the area of Duich Moss which should not have been drained for at least 12 years.
The Nature Conservancy Council have suggested that the peripheral drain on the southern boundary of the phase 1 area covered by the planning permission for the extraction of peat from Duich Moss has been dug to the south of the area identified for such works on the plan associated with the grant of planning permission. Further information is being sought from the Nature Conservancy Council to enable a view to be taken as to whether or not the requirements of the planning permission have been infringed by the works involved.
Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Proposal
asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they undertook to seek the resumption of negotiations for a comprehensive test ban treaty by the end of this year at Geneva recently and what actions they have taken in pursuance of this undertaking.
We did not.
Soviet Ballistic Missile Defence Activity
asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will make a statement on the latest information available to them about Soviet ballistic missile defence activity.
I have today placed in the Library of the House a paper prepared by the Ministry of Defence, the text of which is as follows:THE SOVIET BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENCE
PROGRAMME
Introduction
1. The 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty, as amended by a 1974 Protocol, allows the United States and the Soviet Union to deploy one static ABM system with up to 100 launchers in defence of either an intercontinental ballistic missile silo field or the national capital. Development, testing or deployment of sea, air, space or mobile land-based ABM systems or components is forbidden although research into such systems is not precluded. If "ABM systems based on other physical principles and including components capable of substituting for ABM interceptor missiles, ABM launchers or ABM radars" are created, there is an obligation under the 'Agreed Interpretations' of the Treaty for the signatories to enter into discussions aimed at limiting those systems.
The Soviet Position
2. The Soviet Union has the only deployed ABM system in the world. It is currently being upgraded and when completed will consist of 100 static launchers sited around Moscow, the maximum permitted under the 1972 ABM Treaty. The system will comprise a mix of the existing GALOSH missiles, which are nuclear tipped and designed to intercept their target outside the atmosphere, and the newer high acceleration vehicles (HAV) which are designed to intercept missiles after they have re-entered the atmosphere. This system will enable discrimination against all but the most elaborate penetration aids and will, when deployment is completed in the late 1980s, provide a limited two-layer ABM defence system around Moscow. The missiles are supported by a chain of early warning radars, and surveillance and target acquisition radars with target tracking and missile control radars in the Moscow area.
3. In addition, the Soviet Union has the world's only deployed anti-satellite (ASAT) system, a space-based orbital interceptor of limited capability. Although operational since the early 1970s, the system has been tested on various occasions, not always successfully, and not since 1982.
Soviet Research Programme
4. An examination of Soviet research programmes indicates that mature research programmes are under way in most of the fields—directed energy weapons, heavy lift space capability, pointing and tracking, surveillance and target detection—which could contribute to a defence capability against ballistic missiles.
The Soviet Response to SDI
5. The Soviet propaganda response to SDI has been outright condemnation, on the grounds that such a system would be destabilising, but it has also accepted that it would have to counter it in some manner. In the most authoritative statement so far, Minister of Defence, Marshal Sokolov, on 4th May 1985, said that the Soviet Union would have no choice but to take "couter-measures" if the US started to undermine the "existing strategic-military equilibrium" by deploying weapons in space. He also acknowledged that the Soviet Union had a military space research programme but said that this was only for perfecting space early warning, reconnaissance, communication and navigation systems.
6. Marshal Akhromeyev, Soviet Chief of the General Staff and General Chervov, a leading arms control spokesman have subsequently elaborated on Sokolov's statements. Akhromeyey said that the "limitation, still less the reduction, of nuclear arms is inconceivable in conditions of the militarisation of space". The Soviet Union would be "forced to build up its own strategic offensive forces, supplementating them by means of defence". Chervov added more detail in a press interview, suggesting that Soviet efforts will not attempt to match the US space-based SDI programme—"we will not ape the US in spending billions on space systems"—but will seek a lower cost solution.
7. An account of the US and Soviet positions on ballistic missile defence in relation to the current Geneva arms control talks can be found in the FCO/MOD Defence and Disarmament leaflets Nos. 16 and 17.
Conclusions
8. Despite its criticism of the US SDI programme the Soviet Union has long-standing research programmes examining new technologies with weapons potential which are generally relevant to ballistic missile defence. The future size and shape of Soviet ballistic missile defence is impossible to predict but current R&D programmes provide capabilities to develop SDI-type systems if required.