Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 577: debated on Monday 27 January 1997

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

Monday, 27th January 1997.

Treaty Of Rome: Ministerial Advice

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they agree with the advice given on 14th December 1960 by the then Lord Chancellor, Lord Kilmuir, to the then Lord Privy Seal, the right honourable Edward Heath MP, about the effect on British sovereignty of the United Kingdom's participation in the Common Market under the Treaty of Rome.

The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office
(Baroness Chalker of Wallasey)

It would not be sensible for the Government to comment on advice given by one Minister to another 36 years ago. The Government made clear in the Partnership of Nations White Paper that "common European decision making, as opposed to co-operation, can only be justified where it brings benefits for British security, prosperity and quality of life which are so significant that they justify some loss of unfettered national control over decision making in the area concerned, or where common action enables nation states to exercise joint control which is not open to them individually".

Pilotless Aircraft

asked Her Majesty's Government:What, if any, are the limits on the right of owners of remote-controlled unmanned aircraft (or their agents) to fly them within other countries' national air space.

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Transport
(Viscount Goschen)

The use of pilotless aircraft is governed by Article 8 of the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation. This states: "No aircraft capable of being flown without a pilot shall be flown without a pilot over the territory of a contracting State without special authorisation by that State and in accordance with the terms of such authorisation. Each contracting State undertakes to ensure that the flight of such aircraft without a pilot in regions open to civil aircraft shall be so controlled as to obviate danger to civil aircraft".

Hormone Mimics

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether, to their knowledge, the release (whether intended or unintended) of endocrine and hormone mimics into the environment is taking place; and if so, whether these have, or are suspected of having, an effect on the human genome and if, therefore, such a release is lawful.

Research on laboratory animals such as rats and fish has shown that a number of substances, both man-made and naturally occurring, have the potential to act as hormone mimics. Many of these substances are widely used in industrial processes and consumer products; some occur naturally in foods. They are therefore both present in the environment and released through processes and products.In some circumstances such chemicals can interfere with the endocrine (hormonal) system, for example by acting like the hormone oestrogen to cause female traits to be manifest in male fish. This action does not affect the genome or the heritable material in cells. The department is not aware of any research to suggest that hormone mimics are acting in a way which would affect the human genome. Of course chemicals can have more than one type of biological activity, and substances with endocrine disrupting activities may also for example be carcinogenic and therefore be controlled for those reasons.Releases into the environment of hazardous chemicals (including those potentially interacting with human genetic material, such as mutagens and carcinogens) are controlled under the provisions of Part I of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and the Water Resources Act 1991.Current scientific opinion is that there is no proven link between observed trends in human reproductive health and exposure to putative hormone mimics in the environment. The question of hormone mimics is the subject of considerable research both in this country and elsewhere in Europe and in North America.

Millennium Exhibition Site

asked Her Majesty's Government:What contribution has been paid by British Gas toward clearing pollution caused by them on the proposed site of the Millennium Exhibition.

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of National Heritage
(Lord Inglewood)

I understand that British Gas is committed to meet in full the costs of cleaning up the part of the Greenwich peninsula which it owns to comply with the Environment Act 1995 and using methodology agreed with the Environment Agency. This includes the proposed site of the Millennium Exhibition.The initial land reclamation project, paid for by British Gas, will finish on time at the end of this month, at a cost of £10.5 million.

Unemployment Comparisons

asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the current rate of unemployment in (a) the United Kingdom, (b) the United States of America; and (c) Japan.

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the Chief Executive of the Office for National Statistics, who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.

Letter to Lord Acton from the Director of National Statistics, Mr. Tim Holt, dated 27th January 1997.

I have been asked to reply as the Director of the Office for National Statistics to your recent parliamentary Question on the current rate of unemployment in the United Kingdom, the United States of America and Japan.

Figures based on the internationally recognised International Labour Organisation (ILO) definition of unemployment provide an appropriate basis for international comparisons. The ILO measure of unemployment, as used in the Labour Force Survey, defines somebody as unemployed if they are without a job at the time of interview, were available to start work in the two weeks following their interview and had either looked for work in the four weeks prior to interview or were waiting to start a job they had already obtained. The ILO unemployment rate gives the number of the ILO unemployed as a percentage of the economically active.

The latest available ILO unemployment rates are published by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. These show that the ILO unemployment rates in October 1996 were 7.9% for the UK, 5.2% for the USA and 3.4% for Japan.

Covert Use Of Listening Devices

asked Her Majesty's Government:How many authorisations have been made by Chief Police Officers for actions under Part II (Covert use of listening devices) of the 1984 Home Office Guidelines on the use of equipment in police surveillance operations in the United Kingdom in each of the years 1990–95; andHow many authorisations have been made in relation to each police force separately in the United Kingdom for actions under Part II (Covert use of listening devices) of the 1984 Home Office Guidelines on the use of equipment in police surveillance operations for each of the years 1990–95; andHow many authorisations for intrusive surveillance by Chief Customs Officers of HM Customs and Excise have been made under Part II (Covert use of listening devices) of the 1984 Home Office Guidelines on the use of equipment in police surveillance operations in the United Kingdom for each of the years 1990–95; andHow many authorisations by Chief Police Officers have been made for actions under Part III (Covert use of visual surveillance devices) of the 1984 Home Office Guidelines on the use of equipment in policesurveillance operations in the United Kingdom in each of the years 1990–95; andHow many authorisations have been made in relation to each police force separately in the United Kingdom for actions under Part III (Covert use of visual surveillance devices) of the 1984 Home Office Guidelines on the use of equipment in police surveillance operations for each of the years 1990-95; andHow many authorisations have been made in relation to each police force separately in the United Kingdom for actions under Part III (Covert use of visual surveillance devices) of the 1984 Home Office Guidelines on the use of equipment in police surveillance operations for each of the years 1990–95; andHow many authorisations for intrusive surveillance by Chief Customs Officers of HM Customs and Excise have been made for actions under Part III (Covert use of visual surveillance devices) of the 1984 Home Office Guidelines on the use of equipment in police surveillance operations in the United Kingdom in each of the years 1990–95.

Figures are not held centrally on the number of authorisations. However, an exercise undertaken to inform debate on the current Police Bill confirmed that, in 1995, there were approximately 2,100 chief officer authorisations by police and Her Majesty's Customs and Excise of intrusive surveillance operations in the United Kingdom. We do not intend to publish a further breakdown of these figures into individual organisations as we believe this might help criminals identify the scope of activity in a particular force area.

asked Her Majesty's Government:How many authorisations have been refused by Chief Police Officers for actions under Part II (Covert use of listening devices) of the 1984 Home Office Guidelines on the use of equipment in police surveillance operations in the United Kingdom for each of the years 1990–95; andHow many authorisations have been refused in relation to each police force separately in the United Kingdom for actions under Part II (Covert use of listening devices) of the 1984 Home Office Guidelines on the use of equipment in police surveillance operations for each of the years 1990–95; andHow many authorisations for intrusive surveillance by Chief Customs Officers of HM Customs and Excise have been refused under Part II (Covert use of listening devices) of the 1984 Home Office Guidelines on the use of equipment in police surveillance operations in the United Kingdom for each of the years 1990–95; andHow many authorisations by Chief Police Officers have been refused for actions under Part III (Covert use of visual surveillance devices) of the 1984 Home Office Guidelines on the use of equipment in police surveillance operations in the United Kingdom in each of the years 1990–95; andHow many authorisations have been refused in relation to each police force separately in the United Kingdom for actions under Part III (Covert use of visual surveillance devices) of the 1984 Home Office Guidelines on the use of equipment in police surveillance operations for each of the years 1990–95; andHow many authorisations for intrusive surveillance by Chief Customs Officers of HM Customs & Excise have been refused for actions under Part III (Covert use of visual surveillance devices) of the 1984 Home Office Guidelines on the use of equipment in police surveillance operations in the United Kingdom in each of the years 1990–95.

British Summer Time

asked Her Majesty's Government:Why, given that British Summer Time ends at the end of October, only some eight weeks before the shortest day, it cannot begin eight weeks after the shortest day in mid-February instead of at the end of March; and whether such a step might help to reduce the impact of the winter months.

The United Kingdom's climate normally has more cold weather after the winter solstice

EstablishmentDate of most recent inspectionDate report was submitted to the Home SecretaryDate of publication of the report
Acklington Prison20th–22nd October 199611th December 1996Not yet published
Albany Prison17th-21st June 19967th October 1996Not yet published
Aldington Prison26th–28th June 19952nd November 199517th January 1996
Ashwell Prison22nd–24th April 1996August 199618th November 1996
Askham Grange Prison1st–6th November 19929th February 199314th July 1993
Aylesbury Young Offender Institution5th–7th March 1996Not recorded27th September 1996
Bedford Prison3rd–7th June 199111th October 199131st March 1992
Belmarsh Prison24th–25th September 199617th December 1996Not yet published
Birmingham Prison23rd–29th January 199520th June 199529th September 1995
Blakenhurst Prison22nd–27th May 199410th October 19941st February 1995
Blantyre House Prison12th–17th July 199226th October 19929th June 1993
Blundeston Prison6th–12th October 199331st December 199329th June 1994
Brinsford Young Offender/Institution/Remand Centre6th–10th June 199428th September 199416th December 1994
Bristol Prison14th–16th October 1996Not yet submitted
Brixton Prison8th–12th January 1996August 199620th December 1996
Brockhill Prison27th September–1st October 19934th January 1994January 1994
Buckley Hall PrisonRecently opened-not yet inspected
Bullingdon Prison6th–14th February 19956th June 199526th October 1995
Bullwood Hall Prison/Young Offender Institution22nd–23rd March 199428th April 19944th August 1994
Camp Hill Prison19th–23rd September 19948th March 199510th May 1995
Canterbury Prison6th–7th September 1994Not recorded1st March 1995
Cardiff Prison/Remand Centre25th–26th October 199410th January 19951st March 1995
Castington Young Offender Institution12th–16th July 199320th December 199322nd March 1994
Channings Wood Prison24th–28th June 1996November 1996Not yet published
Chelmsford Prison30th September–4th October 199611th December 1996Not yet published
Coldingley Prison23rd–25th October 199515th December 19958th March 1996
Cookham Wood Prison30th–31st August 199418th November 199425th January 1995
Dartmoor Prison5th February–10th March 1996August 1996Not yet published
Deerbolt Young Offender Institution5th–9th September 199417th February 199510th May 1995
Doncaster Prison11th–15th March 199629th July 1996llth October 1996
Dorchester Prison6th–10th September 199322nd December 199310th March 1994
Dover Young Offender Institution13th–17th May 19967th October 1996Not yet published
Downview Prison10th–13th January 19943rd June 19944th August 1994
Drake Hall Prison/Young Offender Institution2nd–6th December 1996Not yet submitted
Durham Prison26th–30th June 19954th December 19958th March 1996
East Sutton Park Prison/Young Offender Institution21st–26th November 199310th March 199415th June 1994

than before it. Colder morning starts in mid February would adversely affect commuters, schoolchildren and people working in agriculture and construction.

Our summer time dates are also subject to European Community Directives, intended, in particular, to benefit international transport and communications.

Prison Inspections

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will list in respect of each of Her Majesty's prisons in the United Kingdom the date of the most recent inspection, the date on which the report of the inspecting authority was received by the Home Secretary or the Secretary of State for Scotland and the date on which each report was published.

Inspections of Prison Service establishments in England and Wales are undertaken by Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Prisons. The date of his most recent inspection, announced or unannounced, of each operational establishment, the date on which his report was sent to the Home Secretary and the date on which the report was published, are set out in the table below:

Establishment

Date of most recent inspection

Date report was submitted to the Home Secretary

Date of publication of the report

Eastwood Park Prison1st November 19966th January 1997Not yet published
Elmley Prison19th–24th February 199529th June 199514th September 1995
Erlestoke Prison27th–28th April 19938th July 19935th October 1993
Everthorpe Prison25th–27th July 19966th November 1996Not yet published
Exeter Prison/Remand Centre6th–10th October 199321st March 199421st July 1994
Featherstone Prison Feltham Young Offender Institution/Remand Centre5th–9th February 1996August 1996Not yet published
Ford Prison28th October–5th November 1996Not yet submitted
Frankland Prison13th–18th June 19938th October 199313th December 1993
Full Sutton Prison27th–29th September 199510th January 199629th March 1996
Garth Prison6th–14th January 1997Not yet submitted
Gartree Prison6th–7th December 199420th February 199519th May 1995
Glen Parva Young Offender Institution/Remand Centre5th–9th June 19952nd November 19959th February 1996
Gloucester Prison/Remand Centre10th–12th December 1996Not yet submitted
Grendon/Springhill Prison15th–17th July 19968th October 1996Not yet published
Guys Marsh Prison/Young Offender Institution5th–6th May 19938th July 19935th October 1993
Haslar Immigration Holding Centre7th–9th October 199629th November 1996Not yet published
Hatfield Young Offender Institution3rd–5th April 19954th July 199514th September 1995
Haverigg Prison1lth–13th June 19968th October 1996Not yet published
Hewell Grange Prison4th–5th January 19941st March 199413th July 1994
Highdown Prison10th–13th April 199517th July 199527th October 1995
Highpoint Prison14th–18th November 1994Ilth May 199529th September 1995
Hindley Prison5th–6th January 199315th February 19935th August 1993
Holme House Prison9th–12th January 199525th May 199526th July 1995
Hollesley Bay Prison/Young Offender Institution16th–20th October 199420th April 19957th July 1995
Holloway Prison25th–29th November 1996Not yet submitted
Hull Prison6th–14th June 199612th August 1996Not yet published
Huntercombe Young Offender Institution1st–3rd July 1996Not recorded18th November 1996
Kingston Prison9th–13th May 199412th August 199425th October 1994
Kirkham Prison7th–11th February 199416th June 19944th August 1994
Kirklevington Prison26th–30th October 199226th February 19934th August 1993
Lancaster Prison7th–10th November 19939th February 199419th May 1994
Lancaster Farms Young Offender9th–13th September 199618th November 1996Not yet published
Institution/Remand Centre28th November–2nd December 199427th April 19957th July 1995
Latchmere House Prison3rd–7th July 199531st October 199516th February 1996
Leeds Prison20th–24th June 199416th November 199415th February 1995
Leicester Prison29th–30th April 1996August 199626th November 1996
Lewes Prison20th–22nd June 199429th September 199425th November 1994
Leyhill Prison3rd–7th April 199526th July 199529th September 1995
Lincoln Prison8th–13th March 199328th June 199310th August 1993
Lindholme Prison29th April–3rd May 1996Not recorded26th November 1996
Littlehey Prison13th–17th January 1997Not yet submitted
Liverpool Prison10th–14th May 199320 September 199323rd November 1993
Long Lartin Prison13th–18th January 1992Not recorded18th December 1992
Low Newton Prison2nd–6th October 19951st May 199612th July 1996
Maidstone Prison20th–24th November 199526th February 199628th June 1996
Manchester Prison25th–29th September 199522nd January 199612th July 1996
Moorland Prison31st January–4th February 199427th June 199420th November 1994
Morton Hall Prison2nd–6th March 199218th June 19923rd December 1992
The Mount Prison14th–15th December 199420th February 199519th May 1995
New Hall Prison/Young Offender Institution30th May–1st June 199525th October 199520th December 1995
Northallerton Young Offender Institution14th–18th March 199427th June 19949th September 1994
North Sea Camp Prison22nd–26th July 199625th October 1996Not yet published
Norwich Prison7th–16th September 199220th January 199314th July 1993
Nottingham Prison24th–25th November 19922nd February 19935th August 1993
Onley Young Offender Institution15th–19th April 199619th July 1996Not yet published
Parkhurst Prison25th–26th November 1996Not yet submitted
Pentonville Prison5th–9th July 199316th December 199322nd March 1994
Portland Young Offender Institution2nd–4th July 19968th October 1996Not yet published
Preston Prison16th–18th January 19968th May 19965th July 1996
Ranby Prison25th–29th March 1996August 1996Not yet published
Reading Remand Centre16th–17th May 199512th July 199515th September 1995
Risley Prison23rd–25th August 19962nd September 1996Not yet published
Rochester Prison30th October–3rd November 19957th March 199610th May 1996
Send Prison13th–15th May 199612th August 199618th November 1996
Shepton Mallet Prison15th–17th July 19964th November 1996Not yet published
Shrewsbury Prison4th–8th July 199418th November 199422nd March 1995
Stafford Prison1st–5th May 199512th September 199515th November 1995
Standford Hill Prison19th–23rd February 1996September 199611th October 1996

Establishment

Date of most recent inspection

Date report was submitted to the Home Secretary

Date of publication of the report

Stocken Prison25th–29th October 199324th February 199419th May 1994
Stoke Heath Prison/Young Offender Institution18th–22nd July 199424th November 199415th February 1995
Styal Prison/Young Offender Institution4th–8th November 1996Not yet submitted
Sudbury Prison8th–10th January 19967th May 19965th July 1996
Swaleside Prison1st–2nd February 199418th April 199415th July 1994
Swansea Prison20th–22nd November 19957th March 199610th May 1996
Swinfen Hall Young Offender Institution7th–11th June 19935th October 19937th December 1993
Thorn Cross Young Offender Institution31st August— 3rd September 199322nd December 199310th March 1994
Usk and Prescoed Prison/Young Offender Institution2nd–4th September 19966th November 1996Not yet published
The Verne Prison20th–24th May 1996August 1996Not yet published
Wakefield Prison6th–7th December 199316th February 199410th May 1994
Wandsworth Prison10th–14th October 199416th March 199526th May 1995
Wayland Prison27th November— 1st December 19952nd April 199631st May 1996
Wealstun PrisonFormerly Rudgate and Thorp Arch Prison—not yet inspected
Wellingborough Prison21st–24th June 199325th August 19935th October 1993
Werrington Young Offender Institution23rd–27th October 19958th February 199619th April 1996
Wetherby Young Offender Institution7th–11th March 199427th July 199426th October 1994
Whatton Prison17th–21st July 199529th November 199523rd February 1996
Whitemoor Prison16th–17th September 199629th November 1996Not yet published
Winchester Prison11th–16th January 199314th April 199314th July 1993
Woodhill Prison25th–29th April 1994August 199420th October 1994
Wolds Remand Prison17th–26th May 199314th July 199326th August 1993
Wormwood Scrubs Prison2nd–6th September 199629th October 1996Not yet published
Wymott Prison7th–8th December 199420th February 199510th May 1995

The inspection of Prison Service establishments in Scotland is a matter for the Secretary of State for Scotland. I understand from him that the dates of the most recent announced inspections undertaken by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons for Scotland, the dates

Establishment

Date of most recent inspection

Date report was submitted to the Home Secretary

Date of publication of the report

Aberdeen Prison29th August–3rd September 19935th November 19927th January 1994
Barlinnie Prison31st October—llth November 199328th January 19941st June 1994
Castle Huntly Prison10th–14th November 199623rd January 1997
Cornton Vale Institution19th–31st May 19969th August 199613th November 1996
Dumfries Young Offender Institution15th–20th May 19949th August 199425th October 1994
Dungavel Prison19th–24th March 19955th May 199529th June 1995
Edinburgh Prison8th–17th September 19967th November 199616th January 1997
Friarton Prison22nd–26th January 199524th February 199526th April 1995
Glenochil Prison/Young Offender Institution18th February—1st March 199619th April 199613th June 1996
Greenock Prison12th –17th November 199513th December 199513 March 1996
Inverness Prison21st–26th August 199424th October 199420th December 1994
Longriggend Remand Institution21st–26th June 19927th September 199215th December 1992
Low Moss Prison16th–21st May 199319th July 199314th September 1993
National Induction CentreRecently opened—not yet formally inspected
Noranside Prison20th–25th March 199431st May 199411th August 1994
Penninghame Prison8th–11th December 1996
Perth Prison28th March—7th April 19937th June 199326th August 1993
Peterhead Prison7th–15th September 199527th October 199525th January 1996
Peterhead UnitRecently opened-not yet formally inspected
Polmont Young Offender Institution13th–22nd November 199416th December 199422nd February 1995
Shotts Prison6th–16th February 199410th May 199411th August 1994
Shotts Unit6th–16th February 199421st March 19941st June 1994

on which his reports were sent to the Scottish Prison Service and the Secretary of State, and the dates on which the reports were published are as set out in the table below:

General Chiropractic Council

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will announce the designate membership of the first General Chiropractic Council.

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health
(Baroness Cumberlege)

We are pleased to announce that the designate membership of the first General Chiropractic Council (GCC) is as follows:

Chairman (lay member):

Mrs. Norma F. Morris MA: visiting fellow at University College London currently engaged in research and consultancy in the field of science policy and research management.

Chiropractic members (all practising chiropractors):

Education members:

  • Mr. Alan Breen
  • Ms. Karen Flintoff
  • Mr. Timothy C. Jay
  • Mr. R. Brian Mouatt CBE BDS MGDSRCS

Lay members:

Mrs. Peaches Golding BA MCIM MIMgt: director of marketing and public relations company and regional co-ordinator of a Prince's Trust initiative to boost ethnic minority economic activity.

Mr. A. Robin Hodgson: retired Chief Executive of Hampshire County Council and qualified solicitor.

Lady Peston (Helen): voluntary worker with particular interest in people with disabilities and communication impairments.

Mrs. Linda J. Stone FRPharmS: community pharmacist and former President of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain.

Professor Iain McCall FRCR: Professor of radiological science at the University of Keele, and consultant radiologist at the Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital.

The Chairman and membership will meet shortly to begin the preliminary work of drawing up a business plan for the new GCC and the outline of the necessary structures for the administration of the statutory registration scheme for chiropractors. As soon as this preliminary work is complete, the first of the Commencement Orders will be made to bring the essential elements of the Chiropractors Act 1994 into force, and the members of the GCC will be formally appointed.