Written Answers
Tuesday, 24th June 1997.
St Helena: Aid Budget
asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the £8 million in budgetary aid to St. Helena mentioned by Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean on 11 June (H.L. Deb., col. 922) includes the subsidy to the Royal Mail Ship, and is not additional to it as appears to be suggested.
The total estimated figure for the UK's bilateral aid programme to St. Helena in 1997–98 is £8.7 million. This includes both budgetary aid and the Royal Mail Ship subsidy.
Baltic States: English Language Textbooks
asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will make available, at no cost, to the Baltic States of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, English language textbooks for use in primary and secondary schools in those countries.
We have no plans to provide English language textbooks to schools in the Baltic States in addition to the work which is already being sponsored by the British Government in the education field. The British programme of technical assistance to the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the Know How Fund, subsidises the Low Priced Books Scheme, which provides books to a number of countries in the region, including the Baltic States at around 30 per cent. of their UK price. The British Council also provides English language training in the Baltics.
Religious Discrimination
asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they intend to introduce a measure to make it unlawful to discriminate on religious grounds in employment, housing, education and the provision of goods, services and facilities to the public.
The Government are aware of the concern about religious discrimination and are giving the matter consideration. The Government have no immediate plans to introduce new legislation.
Firearms: Penalties For Illegal Possession
asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will undertake a review of the penalties for the illegal possession of firearms of all types.
The penalties for the illegal possession of firearms were last increased in 1994. The maximum penalty for the illegal possession of a prohibited weapon (including, from 1 July, large-calibre handguns) is 10 years' imprisonment; seven years for the illegal possession of a sawn-off shot gun or a firearm converted from a replica; and five years for the illegal possession of a firearm or shot gun.However, we shall be looking again at these penalties when we come to review all the firearms controls once the Firearms Bill has been passed.
Passport Agency: Performance Againsttargets
of Edmonton asked Her Majesty's Government:How the United Kingdom Passport Agency performed against its targets in 1996–97 and what performance targets have been set for the agency in 1997–98.
My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Mr. O'Brien) is pleased to say that the United Kingdom Passport Agency achieved all its targets in 1996–97. The targets for processing properly completed straightforward applications were met with demand for passport services at its highest recorded level. The average turnround time for the whole year was 6.3 working days. The Passport Agency's financial target was to reduce its unit cost by 3 per cent. in real terms. The latest indications are that the agency has achieved an 8.5 per cent. real terms reduction in its unit cost. Customer satisfaction levels remain very high.During 1997–98 my honourable friend expects the Passport Agency to continue to improve its standard of service to the public and manage a predicated reduction in demand as efficiently as possible.He has set the agency the following key targets:
The Chief Executive will remain directly accountable to my honourable friend for the performance of the Passport Agency. An Advisory Board, including two private sector members with experience of delivering services to the public, will continue to provide him with an independent assessment of the agency's performance.
Child Benefit For Over-16S
asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether it is their intention to continue to pay Child Benefit for 16–18 year-olds.
Child Benefit is only payable for those over 16 who stay in certain types of education. The Government are reviewing educational finance and maintenance for those older than 16 to ensure higher staying on rates at school and college, and that resources are used to support those most in need.
British Citizens From Sierra Leone: Habitualresidence Test
asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will exempt British subjects evacuated from Sierra Leone from the operation of the Habitual Residence Test.
We have no plans to exempt British citizens who have returned from Sierra Leone from the habitual residence test. However, we are committed to a wide ranging review of social security. The habitual residence test will form a part of this work.
Chemical Manufacture And Exportinformation
asked Her Majesty's Government:For what purposes propane phosphonic dichloride, diethyl propane phosphoryl dichloride, propyl phosphonic dichloride, ethyl succinyl chloride and thionyl chloride are manufactured, which companies manufactured these chemicals in the United Kingdom between 1988 and 1991; where was their ultimate destination; and whether they are currently being manufactured by any UK companies.
I am advised that propane phosphonic dichloride and propyl phosphonic dichloride are the same chemical. It is a chemical intermediate manufactured in the UK by two companies in research quantities. Diethyl propane phosphoryl dichloride is not known to my department. Thionyl chloride is manufactured in the UK by three companies for use as a general purpose chemical reagent. Ethyl succinyl chloride is an intermediate in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals and is manufactured by one company for research purposes. Thionyl chloride required an export licence for the period 1988–1991. However, to provide the detailed information required for that period would require extensive research and agreement of commercial parties and would incur disproportionate costs. Apart from this export licence, there was no requirement over that period to keep official information on either the manufacture or the export of these specific chemicals.
Legal Aid: R V Kevin Maxwell And Others
asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the answers given by the Lord Chancellor on 30 January 1995
(WA 101) and on 18 December 1996 (WA 131), whether it is now possible for them to give the full details concerning legal aid paid to barristers and each solicitor in R. v. Maxwell Brothers, including how much was paid to each barrister and each solicitor.
I am not in a position to provide full details of the amounts paid to individual banisters and solicitors firms in the proceedings against K and I Maxwell, L Trachtenberg, R Bunn, A Fuller and M Stoney because not all the claims have been settled. I can confirm, however, that £13.36 million had been paid as of 17 June 1997 from the legal aid fund to lawyers who acted in this case. That sum includes £1.95 million paid on account in respect of Crown Court proceedings and £0.83 million paid in respect of the magistrates' costs.It is estimated that the final costs of the case will not be known before early 1998, when all outstanding claims, including redeterminations, have been dealt with.
Dr Jawad Hashim: Payments To Counsel
asked Her Majesty's Government:What are the sums paid to date out of the legal aid fund to each of the counsel involved in the proceedings involving Dr. Jaward Hashim and the Arab Monetary Fund.
The total paid to each counsel is as follows:Mr. Colin W G Ross-Munro QC, £767,200.Mr. Ian Brownlie QC, £69,178.Mr. Hugo A M Page, £531,734.Mr. Adam V S Lewis, £194,205.The above figures represent the total amounts paid to date on account. Final costs will not be known until final bills have been submitted and the bills have been taxed. The figures include the main actions between Dr. Hashim and the Arab Monetary Fund and related proceedings.
"Highway Code": Revision
asked Her Majesty's Government:When they will complete their revision of the
Highway Code.
The Government hope to be in a position to consult interested bodies on a draft revision of the Highway Code in September this year, with a view to laying the final document before Parliament early in 1998. It should then be published in spring 1998.
"Manifesto For Change"
asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hayman on 20 May
(WA 5) whether they have now had the opportunity to study the Manifesto for Change published by Streetlife, and what are their responses to it.
The aims and purposes of the Manifesto for Change are to challenge and change current attitudes towards homeless people and to help homeless people to have a say in the decisions that affect their lives. The manifesto includes a number of recommendations on civil rights, exclusion, housing, hostels and day centres, resettlement services and benefits.The need to tackle all forms of homelessness is at the heart of our housing policy. We have made a positive start in addressing our manifesto commitments on restoring a proper safety net for families and vulnerable individuals who are homeless unintentionally; and on the release of local authority capital receipts for housing.The Government agree with many of the
Manifesto for Change's recommendations, particularly on the elimination of discrimination against people who are homeless and on the provision of services appropriate to their circumstances. Funding from the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions under Section 180 of the Housing Act 1996 and the recently expanded Rough Sleepers Initiative encourages the provision of advice, services and accommodation which meet the needs of homeless people. We are also keen to ensure that the views of homeless people are taken into account in the development of policies that relate to them. For example, research into single homelessness and independent evaluations of the Rough Sleepers Initiative has included interviews with homeless people to identify the reasons why they became homeless and the help which they think they need.