Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 582: debated on Wednesday 30 July 1997

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

Wednesday, 30th July 1997.

Baltic States: Military Assistance

asked Her Majesty's Government:How much money they have spent on the security of the Baltic States since independence was restored in 1991.

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office
(Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean)

It has been the practice in the past not to release details of military assistance provided to other countries on the grounds that this information is confidential between governments and disclosure would risk damaging our international relations. This practice is now being reviewed against the background of the Government's commitment to openness. I will write to the nobel Lord once the review is complete.

Cyprus: Treaties

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they and (to their knowledge) the United Nations consider the following still fully in force, and binding upon the High Contracting Parties:

  • (1) The 1960 Treaty Concerning the Establishment of the Republic of Cyprus (Cmnd. 1252);
  • (2) The 1960 Cyprus: Treaty of Guarantee (Cmnd. 1253), and the Basic Articles of the Constitution of Cyprus guaranteed therein.
  • We consider both treaties to be in force. We believe the UN shares this view.

    Former Yugoslavia: Indicted War Criminals

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many Bosnian Croats, Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Serbs have been indicted as war criminals, how many of each have been taken into custody and by the forces of which Stabilisation Force (SFOR) countries.

    The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) has published the names of 77 indictees, of whom 10 are in custody. We do not know how many further "sealed" indictments may have been issued by the ICTY. The tribunal does not disclose the nationalities of indictees. Only one of the indictees in custody, Milan Kovacevic, was apprehended by SFOR; the troops directly involved were British.

    Anglo-Faroese Delimitation Talks

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How close they are to finalising negotiations with the Faroese Government over the delineation of the median line and what progress has been made to date.

    Discussions are continuing. A further round of talks was held in Copenhagen on 16 July. Both sides agreed to make every effort to overcome their differences and try to find an agreed solution to the delimitation question in the near future.

    Human Rights Abuses: Imposition Of Sanctions

    asked Her Majesty's Government:In which countries they consider the abuse of human rights to be sufficiently serious to merit the imposition of economic sanctions.

    We may apply economic measures such as the suspension of development co-operation in response to grave and persistent human rights violations, often in conjunction with our European Union partners. This is considered on a case by case basis. We also impose economic sanctions in accordance with any decision of the United Nations Security Council, in cases where there is a threat to international peace and security.

    Foreign Affairs Mission Statement: Saudi Response

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they have received any representations from the Government of Saudi Arabia regarding the "Foreign Affairs Mission Statement" in the context of their commitment to a high priority for human rights.

    There have been no such representations.We remain in close touch with the Saudi Government on a wide range of issues. The Minister of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs. Mr. Fatchett, met the Saudi Ambassador on 21 May and discussed the Mission Statement, amongst other topics.

    Unita

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will support the second package of sanctions against UNITA discussed by the United Nations Security Council.

    As a Permanent Member of the Security Council, we fully support the Presidential Statement made on 23 July which reaffirmed the Security Council's readiness to consider the imposition of further measures against UNITA.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether UNITA has provided the information demanded by the United Nations Security Council on 30 June (S1118/1997), including "complete information regarding all armed personnel under its control… in order for them to be verified, disarmed and demobilised in accordance with the Lusaka Protocol and agreements between the parties in the context of the Joint Commission"; and if so, what.

    UNITA submitted information on the strength of its armed forces and other matters to the Joint Commission on 21 July. A statement by the President of the Security Council on 23 July made clear that the council considers the information submitted to be neither complete or credible.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they are aware of reports suggesting increasing attacks by UNITA in Angola and the risk of renewed war.

    We are aware of reports of increased military activity by both the Angola army and UNITA. We fully support the statement by the President of the Council on 23 July calling upon both parties to refrain from the use of force. The Security Council will continue to monitor the situation closely.

    Anti-Drug Initiatives

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What progress they have made since 2 May in the fight against drugs.

    My right honourable friend the President of the Council has been working with a wide range of ministerial colleagues to ensure a collective and effective response to a major social problem. Specific initiatives under way across government include funding 79 local anti-drugs projects under the £2 million drugs Challenge Fund in England, and related developments in Scotland and Wales; publication of an independent evaluation of Drug Action Teams, which points the way forward for local action against drugs; reversing potential plans for reductions in frontline Customs staff; reinforcing, in the context of the Single Regeneration Budget and elsewhere, the links between tackling drugs and regeneration; planning for the Government's legislative commitment to a drug testing and treatment order; and a cross-departmental review to assess the resources available for action against drugs.In addition, the Government are honouring its manifesto commitment to appoint an anti-drugs supremo to co-ordinate our battle against drugs. The special expert adviser post of UK Anti-Drugs Co-ordinator, also known as the "Drug Czar", is being advertised tomorrow on a three-year full-time fixed-term contract. We are looking for someone who can bring visible leadership and drive to the fight against drugs, working in partnership with all relevant agencies, communities and individuals. The post-holder will urgently review the overall direction of government action, and submit proposals for a new strategy for England, while maintaining strategic oversight of the work in the rest of the UK and internationally. She or he will work directly to my right honourable friend the President of the Council as Chair of the Cabinet sub-committee on drugs misuse, and have access to the Prime Minister. We plan to make an appointment in the autumn, following an open selection process which ensures that the best possible candidates make themselves available for a vitally important job.

    Intelligence And Security Committee

    asked Her Majesty's Government:If a decision has been made on the composition of the Intelligence and Security Committee.

    Following consultation with the Leader of the Opposition and in accordance with Section 10 of the Intelligence Services Act (1994) my right honourable friend the Prime Minister has appointed the Intelligence and Security Committee as follows:

    • The Rt. Hon. Tom King CH, MP (Chairman)
    • Baroness Ramsay of Cartvale
    • The Rt. Hon. Alan Beith, MP
    • Mr. Kevin Barron, MP
    • Ms Yvette Cooper, MP
    • Mr. Barry Jones, MP
    • Mr. Michael Mates, MP
    • Mr. Allan Rogers, MP
    • Mr. Dale Campbell-Savours, MP

    Privy Counsellor's Oath

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Answer given by Lord Richard on 18 June (

    WA 120), whether the following words appear in the Oath of Allegiance taken by Privy Counsellors: "You will to your uttermost bear Faith and Allegiance unto the Queen's Majesty; and will assist and defend all jurisdictions, Pre-eminences and Authorities, granted to Her Majesty, and

    annexed to the Crown by Acts of Parliament, or otherwise, against all Foreign Princes, Persons, Prelates, States or Potentates. And generally, in all things you will do as a faithful and true servant ought to do to Her Majesty. SO HELP YOU GOD" and, if so, whether they see any conflict between those duties and the duties imposed on European Commissioners when they declare at the commencement of their term of office inter alia, "I do solemnly undertake to perform my duties in complete independence, in the general interest of the Communities; [and] in carrying out my duties, neither to seek nor to take instructions from any Government or from any other body".

    The words in question appear not in the Oath of Allegiance, the text of which was given in answer to the noble Lord on 18 June (WA 120), but in the Privy Counsellor's Oath. There is no incompatibility between that Oath and the Declaration made by European Commissioners when assuming office.

    Royal Courts Of Justice: Wheelchair Access To Courts

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Which courts in the Royal Courts of Justice are not accessible to disabled people using wheelchairs.

    The Question concerns a matter which has been assigned to the Court Service under the terms of its Framework Document. I have therefore asked the Chief Executive to respond.

    Letter to Lord Lester of Herne Hill from the Chief Executive of the Court Service, Mr. M. Huebner, dated 30 July 1997.

    Wheelchair Access To Courts In The Rcj

    The Lord Chancellor has asked me to reply to your question about disabled access in the Royal Courts of Justice.

    Of the 78 courts located in the Royal Courts of Justice only four, courts number 26, 27, 28 and 51, are not accessible to people using wheelchairs.

    Motability: Grants For Alterations

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many cars provided by Motability have been altered to assist disabled drivers in each of the last four years, and what percentage this is of all the cars provided.

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Social Security
    (Baroness Hollis of Heigham)

    The information is not available in the format requested. Such information as is available is in the table.

    Financial YearTotal number of cars for which a grant for adaptations has been paid for by Motabilily1New Cars Provided by MotabilityPer cent.
    1993/941,27375,8571.68
    1994/951,28690,9901.41
    1995/961,497106,5271.22
    1996/971,396123,5191.13
    Totals5,452396,8931.37

    Notes:

    1 Figures do not include those drivers who are ex-Invalid Vehicle users or War Pensioners who have had grant assistance by Motability.

    2 It is estimated that approximately 11 per cent. of their disabled drivers have their vehicle adapted without any grant assistance.

    Source:

    Motability.

    Asylum Seekers: Costs Of Support

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they agree with the recent assessment of the Refugee Council that the restoration of benefits to asylum-seekers would cost less than the present arrangements under the National Assistance Act 1948.

    We are committed to a wide ranging review of the major components of the social security system: our aim is to reduce poverty and welfare dependency and to promote work incentives.The Government have made clear that they will review all aspects of arrangements for asylum seekers. The review will consider the costs of all the various options for supporting asylum seekers.

    Employment Levels

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will provide an analysis of the figure of "6 million people of working age currently on benefits and without work" quoted by Lord McIntosh of Haringey on 10 July (

    WA 85) which explains the origins and make-up of that figure.

    The figure is based on information from the Family Resources Survey (FRS). The count of individuals currently in receipt of social security benefits was based on adults aged between 16 and 59 who received a social security benefit, other than those who received only child benefit. Where such individuals formed a benefit unit receiving income related benefits, both were counted as being in receipt of a benefit.

    Being without work was defined as those who were either unemployed on a basis consistent with the International Labour Organisation (ILO) definition, or economically inactive.

    According to the 1995–96 FRS, which covers Great Britain, 6 million people were both in receipt of benefit and out of work, based on the above definitions. The table below breaks down this figure by household type:

    Household Type of individuals in receipt of benefit and out of work

    Adults (millions)

    Single person household1.8
    Multiple person household, no one in work2.3
    Multiple person household, at least one person in work1.9
    Total6

    Notes:

    1. The 1995–96 survey is the latest for which data are available.

    2. The estimates are based on sample counts which have been adjusted for non-response using multi-purpose grossing factors which control for region, council tax band and a number of demographic variables.

    3. Estimates are subject to sampling error.

    4. The ILO definition of unemployment is individuals that are available for and actively seeking work.

    5. The economically inactive will include, amongst others, those who are looking after family/home and whose partners are on low earnings and receiving an income related benefit.

    6. A benefit unit is a single adult or couple living as married and any dependent children.

    7. Income-related benefits are income support, housing benefit and council tax benefit.

    Ncis And The Internet

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What role, and with what powers, it anticipates that the National Crime Intelligence Service will play in policing the World Wide Web, and how any such role will be accommodated within existing and proposed data protection and freedom of information legislation

    The role of the National Criminal Intelligence Service (NCIS) is to provide the police and other law enforcement agencies with intelligence on serious and organised crime. Such work includes dealing with reports about the use of the internet for the distribution of child pornography and is consistent with both current and proposed data protection legislation. There are no plans to give NCIS a specific role for policing the Internet.

    Ncis And Ncs: Chairman And Members

    asked Her Majesty's Government:When they expect to be able to make an announcement about the establishment and membership of the Service Authorities provided for under Sections 1 and 47 of the Police Act 1997 to maintain the National Criminal Intelligence Service and National Crime Squad.

    My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for the Home Department has decided to appoint Sir John Wheeler to chair the Service Authorities. He is delighted that Sir John has accepted this appointment. He has no doubt that his skills and experience will prove invaluable to the Service Authorities in their task of maintaining the National Criminal Intelligence Service (NCIS) and the National Crime Squad, both of which will substantially strengthen our ability to tackle organised and serious crime at national and international level. During his last 18 years in Parliament, Sir John has chaired a number of committees and groups including the All Party Penal Affairs Group and the Home Affairs Select Committee. In 1990 my right honourable friend was awarded a knighthood for service to the Select Committee. He has been a Justice of the Peace in London since 1978 and is an active member of the Order of Saint John.The other independent members my right honourable friend proposes to appoint are Paul Lever and Peter Holland. Paul Lever is chairman of BSM Group plc and of Ashworth Hospital Authority. He has held senior management positions in major public companies and has considerable experience in the fields of strategic and financial management. Peter Holland is an independent business consultant and is also chairman of Hertfordshire police authority. He has held senior management positions in the Reuters Group with responsibility for human resource and financial management.My right honourable friend is also appointing Maria Callaghan to represent him in his capacity as the police authority for the Metropolitan Police District. Miss Callaghan is a member of the Metropolitan Police Committee, chairs the Calotels Hotel Group and has extensive experience of business management. She holds a Bachelor of Law degree and has practised as a commercial lawyer.These four appointments are core members, 10 of them in all. who serve on both Service Authorities. The six other core members are:

    MemberPositionAppointed by
    Cllr Stephen MurphyGreater Manchester Police Authority (LAB)Police authorities (E and W)
    Cllr Bob JamesWest Midlands Police Authority (LAB)Police authorities (E and W)
    Cllr Peter FallowsWest Mercia Police Authority (CON)Police authorities (E and W)
    MemberPositionAppointed by
    David Veness QPMAssistant Commissioner, Metropolitan PoliceACPO
    David Phillips QPMChief Constable, Kent ConstabularyACPO
    John WarneDirector, Organised & International Crime Directorate, Home OfficeHome Secretary
    The NCIS Service Authority has a total of 19 members. The additional members are:
    Cllr Ron Fisher JPSouth Yorkshire Police Authority (LAB)Police authorities (E and W)
    Cllr Owen MayDevon & Cornwall Police Authority (Lib Dem)Police authorities (E and W)
    Cllr Julia SturrockTaysie Joint Police BoardPolice authorities (Scotland)
    Pat Armstrong CBEPolice Authority for Northern IrelandPANI
    Ian Oliver QPMChief Constable, Grampian PoliceACPOS
    Ronnie Flanagan OBEChief Constable, Royal Ulster ConstabularyRoyal Ulster Constabulary
    Dick KellawayChief Investigation officer, Her Majesty Customs & ExciseCommissioners for Customs and Excise
    Duncan MacnivanHead of Police, Fire and Emergencies Group, Scottish OfficeSecretary of State, Scotland
    John Steele CBE OBE TD DLSenior Director, Northern IrelandSecretary of State, Northern Ireland
    The National Crime Squad Service Authority has a total of 17 members. The additional members are:
    Cllr Ken WalkerCleveland Police Authority (LAB)Police authorities (E and W)
    Cllr Barry MurraySouth Wales Police Authority (LAB)Police authorities (E and W)
    Cllr Neil TaggartWest Yorkshire Police Authority (LAB)Police authorities (E and W)
    Cllr Sir John Grugeon DLKent Police Authority (CON)Police authorities (E and W)
    Cllr Elfyn WilliamsNorth Wales Police Authority (Lib Dem)Police authorities (E and W)
    Cllr Mrs Angela Harris DLNorth Yorkshire Police Authority (Lib Dem)Police authorities (E and W)
    David Wilmot QPMChief Constable, Greater Manchester PoliceACPO
    The independent members were selected in line with Nolan principles following the procedures set out by Sir Len Peach in his guidance on public appointments. The police authority members for England and Wales were selected from among the local authority members of police authorities so as to ensure that, as far as practicable, the membership of the Service Authorities reflects the balance of parties across all local authority members of police authorities.

    Hong Kong: Governor's Final Report

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the Governor of Hong Kong submitted a final report on the discharge of his functions under the British Nationality (Hong Kong) Act 1990.

    The Governor submitted his last report to my right honourable friend on 20 June A copy has been placed in the Library.

    Dublin Convention

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What progress is being made in the implementation of the Dublin Convention.

    The Convention Determining the State Responsible for Examining Applications for Asylum Lodged in One of the Member States of the European Communities—the "Dublin Convention"—will come into force on 1 September 1997. The convention, which was ratified by the United Kingdom in 1992, provides a mechanism for determining which member state should be responsible for deciding an asylum application made in the European Union.Responsibility is determined according to a set of criteria. These include whether the applicant has a close family member recognised as a refugee in another member state; whether another member state has granted the person a residence permit or visa; the location of any illegal entry into the European Union; and the existence of a previous asylum application. The applicant can only be transferred under the convention if the receiving state agrees that is responsible and if specific arrangements are made for the transfer. In many cases the receiving state will not be the one from which the applicant embarked. There will be no change to the existing requirement that we must be satisfied that the applicant's life or liberty would not be threatened in the country concerned on account of his race, religion, etc; and that he would not be sent on to another state in breach of the 1951 United Nations Convention on Refugees.The convention provides for the exchange of information on asylum applicants with other European Union states. This may include personal information such as fingerprints. The convention requires that such information may only be used for asylum purposes and may only be communicated to the authorities competent to make decisions on asylum cases. Information about the basis of an asylum claim itself may only be exchanged with the permission of the applicant.

    Horserace Betting Levy: Impact Of National Lottery

    asked Her Majesty's Government:When they intend to publish the second report on the impact of the National Lottery on the horserace betting levy.

    An update on the impact of the National Lottery on the horserace betting levy has been published today. This fulfils an undertaking made during the passage of the National Lottery Bill.The paper, which has been prepared by the Economics Unit of the Home Office, examines continuing trends in off-course betting expenditure, on which the levy is closely dependent.The statistical analysis suggests that, in 1996, betting expenditure off-course was about 10 per cent. below the level it would have reached in the absence of the National Lottery. Horserace betting accounts for an estimated 70 per cent. of such expenditure, and therefore the levy yield is likely to have been similarly affected. This can only be an approximate figure, and the effect of the lottery may vary over time.

    Data Protection Legislation Proposals

    asked Her Majesty's Government:When they will publish their proposals for the implementation of the European Community Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC).

    Copies of the paper setting out the Government's proposals for new data protection legislation will be placed in the Library tomorrow morning at 10 am.

    Crime (Sentences) Act 1997: Implementation

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Which provisions of the Crime (Sentences) Act 1997 will be implemented, and when.

    We will implement most of the provisions of the Act, and to the same timetable as envisaged by the previous administration. The provisions of the Act which we will implement are set out below, according to the target date of implementation.Provisions to be implemented in 1997:

    • Automatic life sentence for a second conviction for a serious sexual or violent offence. (Section 2).
    • Mandatory minimum sentence of seven years for a third Class A drug trafficking conviction (Section 3).
    • Technical provisions and consequential changes arising from Sections 2 and 3, including the extension of the automatic life sentence provisions to Armed Forces legislation (Sections 1, 5, 6, 7 and Schedule 4 as they relate to Sections 2 and 3).
    • New provisions for the release of those sentenced to detention during Her Majesty's pleasure (Sections 28–33).
    • Increase in age limits from 21 to 25 for use of attendance centres for fine defaulters (Section 36).
    • Abolition of consent requirements for certain community penalties (Section 38, and related paragraphs of Schedule 4).
    • Transfer of prisoners between jurisdictions (Section 41, Schedule 1, and relevant paragraphs of Schedules 4 and 5).
    • Repatriation of prisoners (Section 42 and Schedule 2).
    • Increase in maximum penalty for juveniles convicted of indecent assault on a female (Section 44).
    • Naming juveniles in court proceedings (Section 45).
    • Hospital and limitation directions for sentencing mentally disordered offenders (Section 46, and Schedule 4, paragraph 12).
    • Power to specify hospital units for detention of mentally disordered offenders (Sections 47, 49(2) and 49(4)).
    • Movement of conditionally discharged patients between jurisdictions in the United Kingdom (Section 48 and Schedule 3).
    • Extended maximum duration of interim hospital order (Section 49(1)).
    • Transfer of prisoners to private psychiatric hospitals for treatment (Section 49(3)).
    • Committals for sentence (Section 51 and related paragraphs of Schedule 4). This is linked to the plea before venue provision in the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (Section 49), which we propose to bring into force at the same time.
    • Increase in maximum penalty for indecency with a child (Section 52).

    Provisions to be piloted in 1998:

    • Community service or curfew order enforced by electronic monitoring for fine defaulters (Section 35, and paragraph 10(2) of Schedule 4).
    • Community service for persistent petty offenders (Section 37).
    • Disqualification from driving as a penalty (Section 39).
    • Disqualification from driving for fine defaulters (Section 40).
    • Curfew order enforced by electronic monitoring for juveniles (Section 43).

    Other provisions for which no implementation date has yet been decided:

    • New arrangements for crediting time spent in custody on remand in calculation of sentence (Section 9, and related paragraphs of Schedule 4 and 5).
    • Disclosure of pre-sentence reports to the prosecution (Section 50).
    • Application of mandatory minimum sentences for drug trafficking to service law (Section 7 as it applies to Section 3).

    The previous administration said that implementation of what became Section 4 of the Act would depend on the Prison Service's capacity and available resources. They indicated, as an "example" that these provisions could be implemented in October 1999. Because the relevant convictions do not count until the section comes into operation, very few people would be subject to the provisions of Section 4 until 2001. Against this background, and given current pressures on prison capacity and available resources, it would not be practical to implement Section 4 for the present. We shall, however, keep the matter under review.

    We have also decided not to implement the new early release arrangements set out in Section 8, 10–26 and related paragraphs of Schedule 4 and Schedule 5. The same effect can be achieved in a far more clear and straightforward way by ensuring that judges and magistrates spell out in open court what the sentence they have imposed really means in practice. Sections 20–21, which deal with extended post-release supervision of violent and sexual offenders, are integrally linked with the other early release provisions and will not be implemented, but we will bring forward in the Crime and Disorder Bill alternative provisions which will provide the additional protection of the public which they were designed to achieve.

    Delay In The Criminal Justice System: Response To Review

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What action they propose to take on the recommendations of the Review of Delay in the Criminal Justice System.

    The Review of Delay in the Criminal Justice System was set up in October 1996 and its report was published on 27 February 1997. Interested parties were then invited to comment on the 33 recommendations in the report. My right honourable friends the Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Lord Chancellor and the Attorney-General have considered these recommendations, taking account of the responses received, and they have concluded that many of them have the potential substantially to reduce delay without impairing the quality of justice.We have therefore decided to accept the following recommendations, making legislative provision (where necessary) in the Crime and Disorder Bill:

    • those which are designed to enable straightforward guilty plea cases to be dealt with a day or two after charge, thus restoring the concept of summary justice; proposals for improving case management in magistrates' courts by allowing certain powers to be exercised by a single justice and to be further delegated where appropriate to clerks to the justices;
    • the proposal that indictable-only cases should begin in the Crown Court (subject to arrangements being agreed for dealing with remand hearings, submissions of no case to answer, and related matters); and
    • some recommendations for procedural changes in the Youth Court.

    The recommendations relating to legal aid, which complement many of the above, will be considered by my noble and learned friend the Lord Chancellor in the light of the previous Government's proposed reforms and Sir Peter Middleton's review of legal aid which is now in progress.

    We are not persuaded that the case for removing defendants' right of election has yet been made out. But since responses to the consultation exercise indicated some substantial support for this proposal, we shall consider this question further, with a view to publishing a more detailed consultation paper in due course.

    The Government's response to all the recommendations of the Review of Delay in the Criminal Justice System is set out in a document which has been placed in the Library.

    Food Standards Agency: Response And Consultation

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What responses they have received to the consultation on the Professor James' report on proposals for a Food Standards Agency.

    The Parliamentary Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
    (Lord Donoughue)

    My right honourable friends the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and Secretary of State for Health, together with the Secretaries of State for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, welcome the excellent response to the consultation on Professor James' report. The Government have received replies from over 630 organisations and individuals. The responses show that there is widespread support for the proposal to establish a Food Standards Agency which would:

    • be a non-departmental public body accountable to Parliament through Health Ministers and operating on a basis of openness and transparency;
    • create a clear separation between the responsibilities for regulating food safety and for promoting the interests of food-related industries;
    • promote food safety from "plough to plate".
    Many detailed points were raised in the consultation which we are now studying further. Our aim is to publish a White Paper in the autumn setting out the Government's response to Professor James' recommendations, in the light of the first round of public consultation. The White Paper will itself be the subject of a second consultation and a draft Bill will then be drafted and published. We shall bring the Bill before Parliament as soon as parliamentary time permits. It is the Government's intention to establish a Shadow Food Standards Commission once the necessary legislation has made sufficient progress through its parliamentary stages.We are also taking a range of measures to improve food safety arrangements in the transitional period before establishment of a Food Standards Agency. My honourable friend the Minister for Food Safety and the Minister for Public Health will take on a joint role in preparing the way for the Food Standards Agency and ensuring maximum protection for the public. They will carry out this day-to-day role in close consultation with their ministerial counterparts in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Overall policy co-ordination will rest with the Ministerial Committee on Food Safety, chaired by the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster.A key feature of the transitional arrangements will be developing further the independent advisory committees which advise the Government as a whole on food safety and related matters. The Food Advisory Committee (FAC) will be given a special role in the handling of food safety issues which go beyond the remit of any one expert committee.In addition to these UK wide measures, my right honourable friends the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and the Secretary of State for Health are taking specific steps to improve the management of food safety issues in England. A Joint Food Safety and Standards Group (JFSSG) will be formed from the relevant staff in MAFF and DH from 1 September 1997. The group will be headed by Mr. Geoffrey Podger, a Department of Health official currently seconded to MAFF. The new joint group will report to Ministers in both departments. In Scotland all food safety issues are handled by a single team which comes under the responsibility of the Scottish Health Minister; in Wales all food safety issues come under the responsibility of the Welsh Health Minister; and in Northern Ireland the Department of Health and Social Services has lead responsibility for food safety issues.The Chief Medical Officer, Sir Kenneth Calman, will be given a new high-level co-ordinating role in the handling of issues of potential public concern about food. Sir Kenneth will have particular responsibility for a new joint MAFF/DH Risk Communication unit which is to be established and further reinforced by the appointment of an external adviser. This role will be undertaken in consultation with territorial departments.We are also continuing to strengthen our approach to food safety issues taking account of the high priority we give to the protection of public health, the rigorous enforcement of measures designed to protect the public, and our commitment to openness, transparency and responsiveness to consumer concerns.We are placing copies of all the responses to the consultation on Professor James' report in the Library of the House.

    Gyrodactylus Salaris

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they are satisfied that all possible steps are being taken to prevent the salmon parasite gyrodactylus salaris from entering Britain from Scandinavia; and whether they think it is possible to prohibit the import of any material which could transport the parasite to Britain; for example by eggs for salmon farms or by fishing tackle and clothing used by anglers which has not been sterilised; andWhether the threat to the salmon fishing industry posed by the salmon parasite gyrodactylus salaris is so serious as to warrant the maximum possible publicity to warn the country of the threat to the future of the industry.

    The Government are satisfied that existing fish health measures and associated publicity for gyrodactylus salaris have been effective in preventing the introduction of the parasite into Great Britain, despite its presence in parts of Europe for a number of years. The introduction into the British Isles of live salmon and trout, which pose the highest risk, is already prohibited. Salomonid eggs are made safe by disinfection before entering Great Britain. The risks of introducing gyrodactylus salaris through contaminated fishing tackle or clothing are low and do not warrant changes to legislation, but nonetheless we advise those fishing abroad to take precautions such as drying or disinfecting equipment to avoid the accidental spread of disease.

    Vitamin B6 Supplements

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will indicate the precise legislative powers under which they intend to bring forward orders to impose a ban on higher dose vitamin B6 supplements; what specific steps they took to consult with interested parties prior to the announcement of that ban; and whether they are satisfied that the ban is proportionate to the alleged danger to public health posed by such supplements; andWhen they last met with representatives of (a) Consumers for Health Choice, (b) the Society for the Promotion of Nutritional Therapy, (c) the Council for Responsible Nutrition, (d) the National Association of Healthfood Stores, and (e) the Healthfood Manufacturers Association to discuss the ban on vitamin B6 supplements; and whether they will identify those among the above organisations which have supported the ban; andWhat recent representations about the ban on higher dose vitamin B6 they have received from Dr. Derek Shrimpton or other Fellows of the Royal Society of Medicine; and whether any such representations supported or opposed the introduction of the ban.

    The Government have no intention of imposing a ban on higher dose vitamin B6 products. They have decided that the level of vitamin B6 in dietary supplements sold under food law should be limited to a maximum of 10mg per daily dose. This limit will be introduced by regulations made under Section 16(1) of the Food Safety Act 1990. However, higher dose products licensed as medicines for the treatment of specific clinical conditions will continue to be available from pharmacies and on prescription.The Government's decision to limit the level of vitamin B6 in dietary supplements sold under food law was based on advice from two independent committees, the Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment (COT) and the Food Advisory Committee (FAC). In formulating this advice the Committees took account of information supplied and views expressed by organisations with an interest in the subject matter. The organisations were invited to submit to the COT data on the safety of vitamin B6 which was considered before the committee finalised its advice. Their views on the possibility of a voluntary limit of 10mg of vitamin B6 per daily dose were also sought by officials from this department as part of the FAC's consideration.The Government were aware of the views that had been expressed by interested organisations when it considered the advice of the FAC. Its decision to accept that advice was announced on 4 July. On 23 July my honourable friends the Minister of State at the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and the Minister for Public Health met with representatives of various organisations, including Consumers for Health Choice, the Society for the Promotion of Nutritional Therapy, the Council for Responsible Nutrition, the National Association of Healthfood Stores, and the Healthfood Manufacturers Association in order to listen to their concerns about the proposed limit. All of the organisations invited to the meeting had questioned the need for the proposed limit.Dr. Derek Shrimpton was present at the meeting on 23 July. He also met with officials from the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food earlier on the same day. On both occasions he questioned the validity of the scientific evidence upon which the proposed limit is based.Interested organisations who had not expressed any reservations about the proposed limit were not invited to the meeting on 23 July. However, my honourable friend the Minister of State has written to a number of those organisations, specifically the National Consumer Council, the Consumers' Association and the National Food Alliance, asking if they wished to make any comments.The Government have every confidence in the ability of the COT and FAC and in the quality of their advice. They are also satisfied that the proposed limit on the level of vitamin B6 in supplements sold under food law is a proportionate response to the public health risk posed by high-dose vitamin B6 supplements.

    Vitamin B6 Supplements: Adverse Reactions

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What information they have concerning the number of British people who have taken higher dose vitamin B6 supplements in each of the last 10 years for which figures are available; and whether they will indicate for each of those years the number of incidences of death or serious adverse reaction which have been recorded.

    The Government have no information concerning the number of British people who take higher dose vitamin B6 supplements, nor is there any established reporting procedure for adverse effects arising from consumption of dietary supplements sold under food law. However, the UK Yellow Card Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) reporting scheme administered by the Medicines Control Agency has reports associated with medicinal products. These are provided voluntarily by doctors, dentists and pharmacists and indirectly by pharmaceutical companies and are not a complete record of the ADR's occurring in the population.From 1964 to date there have been a total of 649 reports of 1,181 spontaneously reported adverse reactions associated with products containing vitamin B6, of which 16 were fatal. The majority (63 per cent.) of reactions are associated with products containing a number of constituents, 410 reactions being associated with products containing only vitamin B6, most at doses below 100mg daily.A summary of reactions reported with single constituent products containing vitamin B6 in each of the last 10 years is given in the table below.

    Table of Yellow Card Reports from 1987 to 1996 for Vitamin B6
    YearTotal reactionsSeriousFatal
    1987730
    1988410
    1989830
    1990220
    1991320
    1992640
    1993521
    1994100
    1995550
    1996110
    Total 1987–9642231
    The inclusion of any one reaction in the table does not necessarily mean that vitamin B6 caused the reaction. Other factors such as the temporal relationship between medicine and reaction, any concomitant medication and the possibility of underlying disease must also he considered.

    Vitamin B6: Limit In Dietary Supplements

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What recent representations about the ban on higher dose vitamin B6 they have received from Dr. John Hathcock or other former directors of the United States Food and Drug Administration; and whether any such representations supported or opposed the introduction of the ban.

    The Government have no intention of introducing a ban on higher dose vitamin B6 products. It has accepted advice from the independent Food Advisory Committee that the level of vitamin B6 in dietary supplements sold under food law should be limited to a maximum of 10mg per daily dose. However, higher dose products licensed as medicines for the treatment of specific clinical conditions will continue to be available from pharmacies and on prescription.On 23 July my honourable friends the Minister of State at the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and the Minister for Public Health met with representatives of organisations who were unhappy with the proposed limit in order to listen to their concerns. Dr. John Hathcock was present at that meeting as part of a delegation from the National Association of Healthfood Stores. He also met with officials from the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food earlier on the same day. On both occasions he questioned the validity of the scientific evidence upon which the proposed limit is based.

    Vitamin B6: Scientific Evidence For Limiting Supplementation

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What recent representations about the ban on higher dose vitamin B6 they have received from Professor Alan Gaby or others who have reviewed the published literature relating to supplementation with such vitamins; and whether any such representations supported or opposed the introduction of the ban.

    The Government have no intention of introducing a ban on higher dose vitamin B6 products. They have accepted advice from the independent Food Advisory Committee that the level of vitamin B6 in dietary supplements sold under food should be limited to a maximum of 10mg per daily dose. However, higher dose products licensed as medicines for the treatment of specific clinical conditions will continue to be available from pharmacies and on prescription.On 23 July my honourable friends the Minister of State at the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and the Minister for Public Health met with representatives of organisations who were unhappy with the proposed limit in order to listen to their concerns. Professor Alan Gaby was present at that meeting as part of a delegation from Consumers for Health Choice. He also met with officials from the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food earlier on the same day. On both occasions he questioned the validity of the scientific evidence upon which the proposed limit is based.

    Veterinary Laboratories Agency: Annual Report And Accounts

    asked Her Majesty's Government:When the annual report and accounts for the Veterinary Laboratories Agency is due to be published.

    The Veterinary Laboratories Agency's annual report and accounts was published on 29 July 1997. Copies are available in the Library of the House. The report demonstrates the continuing progress and success of the organisation as a "Next Steps" Agency.

    Bse Selective Cull

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What progress has been made on the BSE selective cull.

    Since 1 May progress with the selective cull has substantially improved. In Northern Ireland the cull is complete except for six animals and any which have been imported from Great Britain. In GB we have completed nearly half of the natal herd visits; in Scotland we have completed all of them. In England and Wales all but a few of the visits have been made to farms with animals in the compulsory years. We have now slaughtered 15,000 animals in the UK: 10 times the number that had been slaughtered when we came into office. This is good progress, but we need to do better still.We have looked at all our procedures to see what more can be done to speed up. We have recently reached agreement with the Commission that farmers can choose a valuer from a list of valuers drawn up by the Ministry, where the valuation is for 10 or fewer animals. Up to now, many owners are opting to have two valuers, which has created problems in arranging valuations, and thus slowed down progress with the cull. This new procedure is already being put into practice.Now that owners can choose the valuer, my honourable friend the Minister of State for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food does not consider it necessary to have two valuers for 10 or fewer animals. We therefore propose to amend the BSE Compensation Order 1996 so that the option of having two valuers for 10 animals or fewer is no longer available. We regard this as necessary in particular to ensure that we make maximum progress with animals which have moved away from their herd of birth and will mainly be dealt with as single animals. Farming and valuers' organisations will be consulted on the draft amendments to the order which, in the interests of making speedy progress on the cull, my honourable friend the Minister of State for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food proposes to lay and bring into force during the Recess.

    Intervention Board: Performance And Key Targets

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How the Intervention Board performed against its targets for 1996–97; and what key performance targets have been set for 1997–98.

    The Intervention Board's performance against its key targets in 1996–97 was as follows:

    Target PercentagePerformance
    Percentage of claims processed within deadlines99.085.0
    Percentage of claims processed correctly98.599.5*
    Cumulative running cost efficiency gains2.55.3
    Improvement in index of productivity6.03.0
    Ratio of disallowance to EAGGF funds handled0.40Not yet known
    To maintain expenditure within vote provision, cash and running cost limitsMet
    New value for money savings in procurement of goods6.06.8
    Yield: cost ratio of anti-fraud activities3.0:1.01.2:1.0
    In agreement with my right honourable friends the Secretaries of State for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, my right honourable friend the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food has set the following targets for 1997–98:

    Target percentage
    Percentage of claims processed within deadlines99.0
    Percentage of claims processed correctly98.5
    Cumulative running cost efficiency gains2.5
    Improvement in index of productivity6.0
    Ratio of disallowance to EAGGF funds handled0.40
    To maintain expenditure within vote provision, cash and running cost limits
    New value for money savings in procurement of goods and services6.5
    Yield: cost ratio of anti-fraud activities3.0:1.0
    *Results for BSE-related schemes were based on a smaller sample of processed claims, because monitoring on the same basis began later in the year.

    Radioactive Waste: Dumping At Sea

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What information is being made available on the dumping of radioactive waste at sea.

    The department and others concerned with the disposal of radioactive waste have undertaken detailed searches of archive records relating to dumping at sea at Beaufort's Dyke and elsewhere. Details of the searches carried out so far and the findings of each department have been placed in the Library of the House.Information was found of two further instances of radioactive waste being dumped, or possibly being dumped, in Beaufort's Dyke in addition to that reported to the House on 1 July (

    Official Report, cols. WA 21–22). The first instance was identified by the Scottish Office from a reference on one paper and relates to a disposal being arranged in 1957 at Cairn Ryan (a port used for the disposal of munitions to Beaufort's Dyke) of a damaged closed caesium—137 source. There is no indication of the disposal site nor any other information on the form of disposal. The level of radioactivity is described as about one quarter-curie.

    The second instance was identified by my department concerning the dumping in 1976 of about 10,000 tonnes of building rubble and soil from the demolition of the premises of Thorium Ltd., a company which extracted thorium from minerals and left waste product containing enhanced levels of naturally radioactive material. The authorisation required that the average radioactivity of this demolition material should be less than 5 x 10-4 microcuries/gm and was not to exceed 5 x 10-3 microcuries/gm in any part.

    In respect of other locations not previously recognised as dumpsites for radioactive waste, the Scottish Office have identified the following information:

    • scrap from a Ferranti radioactive valve manufacturing unit was dumped by Ferranti between 1954 and 1957 in the Firth of Forth off North Queensferry. An estimate at the time put this at 7.5 milligrams of radium bromide at six-monthly intervals.
    • Advice to UK Time Ltd. in 1949 to dispose of 35,000 luminised dials likely to have contained in total between 25 and 50 mg radium either on land or in sealed drums at least five miles off shore. A subsequent paper suggests that such dumping continued in the North Sea during the 1950s.
    • The dumping by ICI Ltd. of two anti-static devices (strontium-90) at the explosives disposal site off the Isle of Arran prior to 1958.
    • The dumping in 1963 at Garroch Head, on the Clyde, of material from the clear-up of a former radium factory at Balloch.

    In checking these historical records, departments have in addition identified instances when liquid wastes or sludge containing small amounts of radioactivity were dumped at sea through dispersion into the water column from ships. These disposals were from the naval dockyards at Chatham and Rosyth into the North Sea beyond the Thames estuary and the Firth of Forth respectively during the mid-late 1960s and early 1970s; sludges from industrial sources containing enhanced natural radioactivity into the Liverpool Bay area, and possibly Morecambe Bay and the Humber Estuary, during the early to mid 1970s; and mildly radioactive solutions from early experiments at MAFF's Lowestoft laboratory in the North Sea in the late 1940s.

    Where possible these reports are being followed up to see if further information can be obtained.

    On the evidence of the papers which have been examined my honourable friend the Minister of State for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food was advised that, even using cautious assumptions, it is estimated that radiation exposures to the public following any dispersal of radioactivity in the sea would give rise to radiation dose levels well within the International Commission on Radiological Protection recommended dose limit and a small fraction of those arising from natural background radioactivity. Nevertheless, he is arranging for the National Radiological Protection Board to make an independent assessment of this information and anything further that can be found. In particular, he will ask them to advise him of the radiological significance of the disposals and on whether there is any need for monitoring over and above that which is already undertaken. We shall report further to the House when he has received the board's advice.

    Veterinary Field Service

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the Veterinary Field Service will become a "Next Steps" executive agency.

    My right honourable friend the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food has decided that the Veterinary Field Service (VFS) should not at present become an executive agency.Following an internal review of MAFF veterinary services under the last government, the VFS structure was streamlined. One recommendation in that review was that the VFS should become a "Next Steps" agency. It would be inappropriate to proceed with a move to agency status given the moves towards establishing the Food Standards Agency and devolution, which have implications for the State Veterinary Service.

    Government Reviews

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many reviews have been announced in this Session of Parliament; when they expect each to be completed; what the anticipated cost of each will be; and how many more they expect to announce.

    As at 27 June, we had announced the following significant reviews:

    A comprehensive spending reviewThis will be completed in the next twelve months. Estimates of the cost of the comprehensive spending review are not held centrally. But the costs will be absorbed within departments' running costs limits set in the Budget on November 1996.
    A strategic defence reviewWork on the strategic defence review is envisaged to be completed around the turn of the year. Maximum use will be made of existing structures to conduct the review. Additional costs will be incurred, including the process of consultation with outside experts and interests. It is too early to predict the total additional cost.
    A review of the bureaucratic burden on teachersThe final report on this review is planned for spring 1998. Costs are expected to be met from planned departmental running costs.
    A review of the detailed criteria used in considering licence applications for the export of conventional weaponsAn announcement was made on 28 July of the criteria which will be used by the Government in considering licence applications for the export of conventional arms.
    A review of the law relating to surrogacyThe review team has not yet met but it is expected to report later this year or early next year. The costs cannot be estimated reliably at this stage.
    A review of the law relating to silicone breast implantsThis aims to report to the Chief Medical Officer in late 1997. Completion date for the review will, however, depend on the amount of work that the group considers necessary to fulfil its remit. It is too early to say what the cost will be as it will depend on the amount of work that the group considers necessary.
    A review of proposed NHS Private Finance Initiative schemesThis is an ongoing review looking at the process and product of PFT in the NHS. This review will take into account the findings of Malcolm Bates's review of PFI in all Government departments. Costs will be met from planned departmental running costs.
    A review of the breast cancer screening service in Devon and implications for the breast screening programme as a wholeThis is nearing completion. The estimated cost is £2,000 for travel and subsistence, apart from normal departmental and NHS running costs.
    A review of London health servicesThe Independent Advisory Panel conducting the review has been asked to complete the main elements of its work by October 1997. It is not yet possible to estimate the cost.
    A review of the arrangements for celebrating the MillenniumThe review has been completed. The review was conducted by the Department of Culture, Media and Sport, and the Millennium Commission as part of their normal activities, and no additional costs were incurred by the department.
    A review of the National Lottery, leading to the publication of a White PaperA White Paper was published on 21 July, initiating a consultation period prior to the introduction of legislation in late November— early December. Costs will be met from planned departmental running costs.
    A review of film policyThe review is expected to conclude in spring 1998. Expenses are being paid to the members of the review group. No decisions on further expenditure have yet been made. Any such expenditure would be met from within the existing departmental budget for consultancies.
    A review of Compulsory Competitive Tendering regulations which will improve the existing regime pending its replacement by a duty of best valueThe review has been completed. Costs were met from planned departmental running costs.
    A fundamental review of transport policy leading to the publication of a White Paper on our long-term strategy for an integrated transport policy.The aim is to publish a White Paper on integrated transport policy in the spring of next year taking account of the outcome of the review of transport policy, the review of the roads
    A review of the roads programmeprogramme and the review of bus policy. Costs will be met from planned departmental running costs.
    A bus review
    A review of the arrangements for enforcing the rules on the welfare of animals exported live to the ContinentThe intention is to introduce changes which are shown to be necessary as soon as practicable. Costs will be met from planned departmental running costs.
    A review of the case for inoculation as a substitute for rabies quarantineNo date for the completion of this review has yet been set. Scope and costs are not yet finalised.
    A review of the Milk Development CouncilThis review is expected to be completed later this year. Costs will be met from planned departmental running costs.
    A review of international development policy leading to publication of a White PaperThe work will not involve any extra costs. Publication costs will be recovered.
    A review of economic regeneration in WalesThe aim is to complete this review by September. Precise costings cannot be given at this stage, but any costs additional to normal departmental running costs are expected to be minimal.
    A review of existing proposals for reform of civil litigation and legal aidThe Lord Chancellor has asked Sir Peter Middleton for a preliminary report by the end of September on whether these proposals are the best way to reduce costs and delay in litigation and improve the control over the cost of legal aid. Any further work will depend on the terms of the preliminary report. The review is expected to cost around £75,000 to the end of September for Civil Service and other support and publication costs. The majority of running
    costs will be internal running costs met from the planned departmental running cost budget.
    A review of the Crown Prosecution ServiceThis is expected to be completed by the end of the year. Costs cannot be determined at this stage.
    A review of private finance machineryThis was completed on 13 June. No costs were incurred outside normal departmental running costs.
    A review of the tax benefits systemThis is expected to report in around a year. Costs are expected to be met from planned departmental running costs.
    A review of the Post OfficeIt is too soon to say when the review will be completed. No external costs are yet committed.
    An audit of the Foresight programme which is a programme to bring together business. Government and academia to identify market and technology opportunities for the future. The audit aims to catalogue individual Foresight initiatives taken by government departments and to consider ways to improve the co-ordination of the programmeThis will report to Ministers by the summer Recess. Costs will be met from within planned departmental running costs.
    An Export Forum to review the effectiveness of current official export promotion programmes and to make recommendations for a new export initiativeThis will report to Ministers by the autumn. Costs will be met from planned departmental running costs.
    A review of steps which might be taken to strengthen democratic control of the three public water authorities in ScotlandThis review is expected to be completed in November. External costs are expected to be £20,000.
    Scottish Enterprise reviewThe completion date is not yet known. Costs will be met from planned departmental running costs.
    A review of the way in which social rented housing is supported in ScotlandExpected to be completed in March 1998. Costs will be met from planned departmental running costs.
    A review of the Skye Bridge tolling arrangementsThe review has now been completed. Costs were met from planned departmental running costs.
    A fundamental review of transport policy in Scotland leading to the publication of a White Paper in our long-term strategy for an integrated transport policyThe review is expected to be completed in spring 1998. Scope and costs are not yet finalised.
    A review of the Scottish roads programmeThe review is expected to be completed in summer 1998. Scope and costs are not yet finalised.

    A review of the existing code of practice on access to government informationThis has been completed. There were no costs outside normal departmental running costs.
    The preparation of the White Paper on Better Government will include reviews of ministerial accountability and non-departmental public bodies, including the full implementation of the Nolan recommendations and their extension to all public bodiesThis review process will be undertaken within existing resources and results will be published in the White Paper in the autumn.
    The Department of Social Security is committed to modernising the structure and delivery of social security in order to encourage independence, social cohesion and well being; to develop an active welfare system which supports work, savings and honesty; and to help tackle effectively unjustifiable social and economic inequalities. To that end we will be examining the major components of the system. We will consult on specific issues in due course.
    A review of policy on admission charging by national museumsThis review is being conducted as part of the department's normal activities, with no additional costs. It is expected to be concluded by autumn 1997.
    A review of immigration detention policyThis review is being conducted internally in The Home Office. Its scope is wide ranging to cover all aspects of immigration detention policy. The results are expected to be available in the autumn. Costs will be met from planned departmental running costs.

    Any further reviews will be announced as they are initiated.

    Government Secure Intranet

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How they intend to maintain ministerial accountability and effective co-ordinated relations with the Civil Service if the plan to introduce a security-coded Intranet capability is implemented to permit Ministers to communicate directly with each other without going through the formal procedures of meetings and memoranda; andHow the principle of open government can be reconciled with their plan to introduce a security-coded Intranet capability to permit Ministers to communicate directly with each other.

    The Government Secure Intranet is designed to make communications within government faster and more efficient. The Government do not believe it will adversely affect either openness and accountability or the role of the Civil Service in the effective conduct of business.

    Windfall Tax: Impact

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Answer given by Lord McIntosh of Haringey on 10 July (

    WA 86), whether they will now provide answers omitted from their reply concerning profitability, shareholders' funds and dividend policies.

    The windfall tax should have no effect on the underlying profitability of the companies affected. There will inevitably be some effect on shareholders' funds depending upon how companies choose to finance their tax bills. Dividend policies are a matter for companies. A number have said they expect to maintain strong dividend growth, a view shared by market analysts.

    Pension Funds And Act

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Why, in proposing to alter the treatment of advance corporation tax (ACT) for pension funds, it is intended to abandon the convention that tax is levied either on contributions or on pensions in receipt, but never on both, so far as personal pension holders and the self employed are concerned.

    There is no tax charge on exempt pension funds when they receive dividends. But they will no longer receive a subsidy from the Exchequer on their dividend income. The reform of corporation tax has removed a distortion which gave a tax incentive for pension schemes to prefer dividends to long-term growth.

    Lockerbie Investigation

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they have asked the office of the Frankfurt prosecutor for details of the information given by Mr. Abolghasem Mesbahi, a former Iranian intelligence agent who gave evidence in the Mykonos trial, about the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, and whether there are any plans by those in charge of the Lockerbie case to ask the German authorities for permission to interview Mr. Mesbahi themselves.

    It is not the policy of the Scottish prosecuting and investigating authorities to give details of investigative steps. I can however assure the noble Lord that the appropriate steps are being taken to look into these matters.

    Nurses, Midwives And Health Visitors Act 1979: Review

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What plans they have to review the Nurses, Midwives and Health Visitors Act 1979.

    The Government have commissioned an independent and fundamental review of the current operations of the five statutory bodies created by the Nurses, Midwives and Health Visitors Act 1979—the United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting and the National Boards for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting in the four countries of the United Kingdom.

    Asylum: Withdrawal

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What action they will take concerning allegations that two Sudanese doctors working in the United Kingdom's National Health Service were involved in acts of torture in Sudan; and whether a person who was granted exceptional leave to remain, or refugee status, having failed to declare that he committed serious human rights violations in his country of origin would be liable to have his status revoked.

    At present there is no evidence to substantiate these allegations. However, if evidence shows that actions of this nature have taken place, we would expect the appropriate action to be taken.The Government have discretion to withdraw the grant of asylum in the light of evidence that refugee status was obtained by a misrepresentation of material facts or where one of the exclusion clauses of the 1951 United Nations Convention relating to the Status of Refugees would have applied had all the relevant facts been known. We would apply the same considerations where exceptional leave had been granted on humanitarian grounds. Each case would need to be assessed on its individual merits in the light of all the available evidence.

    Mmr Immunisation And Autism

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What has been the annual rate of take-up of the mumps, measles and rubella (MMR) vaccine since its introduction; and, for each of those years, how many five year-olds were in the general population; andHow many cases of regressive autism have been diagnosed in children in each year since the introduction of (a) the MMR vaccine and (b) the measles and rubella (MR) vaccine.

    Measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) immunisation has been recommended for children aged 12 to 15 months since 1988. Coverage figures are therefore collected on the basis of children immunised with MMR vaccine by their second birthday. Since October 1996, a routine second dose MMR immunisation has been recommended for children as part of the pre-school booster programme. Uptake figures for the second dose are not yet available. Coverage figures and the numbers of five year-old children in the general population are given in the following tables.

    Completed primary course: percentage of children immunised by their second birthday in England by financial year
    YearMMR take up rate
    1995–9692
    1994–9591
    1993–9491
    1992–9392
    1991–9290
    1990–9186
    1989–9068
    Office for National Statistics mid-year resident population estimates in England
    YearNumber of children age 5
    1995650,269
    1994645,311
    1993651,539
    1992631,071
    1991623,758
    1990619,623
    1989593,097
    Data are not collected centrally on the number of cases of autism. It is primarily a matter for the statutory authorities to monitor arrangements for assessment in their area. There is no specific requirement to register children diagnosed with autism. It is estimated that the prevalence rate of classic autism is between 4–5 per 10,000 population and that (including these) about 21 per 10,000 may exhibit some features of autism. Recent research in Scandinavia suggested a prevalence rate of Asperger syndrome of 36 per 10,000.

    Human Rights And Biomedicine Convention: Consultation

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Which organisations for the disabled in Great Britain have been consulted about the final wording of Clause 17(2) of the European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine.

    The final wording of Clause 17(2) was a matter for the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. The Government are still considering the ethical and legal ramifications of the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, and have undertaken no formal consultation on the Convention.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will take into account the view of the "VdK" (Verband der Kriegs und Wehrdienstopfer, Behinderten und Rentner Deutschland) organisation for the disabled in Germany, and that of the International League of Societies for Persons with Mental Handicaps, in deciding whether to sign the European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine.

    The Government will take into account any views made known to it concerning signature of the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine.

    Opencast Coal Extraction

    asked Her Majesty's Government:When they intend to publish a consultation paper on planning policy for opencast coal extraction.

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
    (Baroness Hayman)

    We have published a consultation document on the review of planning policy for opencast coal today. This consultation paper, which deals with England only, seeks views on the issues raised by the 10-point plan for opencast coal which we prepared when in Opposition, and the options for change. In the light of responses to this consultation, the Government will decide what changes to policy guidance could and should be implemented in interim planning guidance; which would better be accommodated in a full review, planned for 1998, of Minerals Planning Guidance Note 3 (Coal Mining and Colliery Spoil Disposal), and whether any legislative changes are necessary or desirable in the long term. Copies of the consultation document will be placed in the House Library.My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Scotland expects to publish shortly an equivalent paper for Scotland.

    Blackwall Tunnel Closures

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will state the dates on which the Blackwall Tunnel has been closed or partly closed this year.

    I have asked the Chief Executive of the Highways Agency, Mr. Lawrie Haynes, to write to the noble Lord.

    Letter to Lord Braine of Wheatley from the Chief Executive of the Highways Agency, Mr. L. Haynes, dated 30 July 1997.

    The Minister for Roads has asked me to reply to your recent Question about the dates on which the Blackwall Tunnel has been closed or partly closed this year.
    The layout of the tunnels means they can only be maintained safely by closing them to traffic. The northbound and southbound bores have been subject to closure or restrictions on 109 separate occasions since 1 January 1997. A table showing the dates and times of the closures is attached.
    In addition to the regular planned maintenance carried out on a weekly basis at night and the three consecutive weekend maintenance closures at six-monthly intervals, the northbound tunnel is currently subject to additional daily and night-time closures to facilitate construction of the over-height vehicle escape ramp. This is scheduled to be opened in late August 1997 and will considerably reduce the delays when high vehicles are trapped at the northbound tunnel approach.
    You may also be interested to note that sadly both Blackwall Tunnels were closed for a period during the morning of Saturday 26 July following a fatality in the southbound tunnel.
    A motor cyclist was struck by a vehicle travelling in the opposite direction although the exact circumstance are not yet known. The motor-cyclist unfortunately died from the injuries sustained.

    Blackwall Tunnels planned closures 1997 (as at 24 July 1997)

    Northbound Tunnel

    Date

    Reason for closing

    Time closed

    07 JanuaryNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    04 JanuaryNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    21 JanuaryNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    28 JanuaryNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    04 FebruaryNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    11 FebruaryNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    18 FebruaryNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    25 FebruaryNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    04 MarchNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    11 MarchNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    18 MarchNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    25 MarchNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    1 AprilNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    08 AprilNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    15 AprilNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    22 AprilNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    29 AprilNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    06 MayNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs

    Blackwall Tunnels planned closures 1997 (as at 24 July 1997)

    Northbound Tunnel

    Date

    Reason for closing

    Time closed

    13 MayNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    20 MayNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    27 MayNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    03 JuneNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    10 JuneNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    17 JuneNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    24 JuneNormal weekly maintenance works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    30 JuneSIAC closure for escape ramp works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    01 JulyNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    07 JulySIAC closure for escape ramp works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    08 JulySIAC closure for escape ramp works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    11 JulySIAC closure for escape ramp worksClosed 22:00 hrs
    12 JulySIAC closure for escape ramp worksClosed all day
    13 JulySIAC closure for escape ramp worksRe-opens 15:00 hrs
    14 JulySIAC closure for escape ramp works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    15 JulyNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00
    18 JulySIAC closure for escape ramp worksClosed 22:00 hrs

    Note: SIAC are the contractors working to construct escape ramps for over-height vehicles at the tunnel entrance.

    19 JulySIAC closure for escape ramp worksClosed all day
    20 JulySIAC closure for escape ramp worksRe-opens 15:00 hrs
    21 JulySIAC closure for escape ramp works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    22 JulyNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    24 JulySIAC closure for escape ramp works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    25 JulySIAC closure for escape ramp worksClosed 22:00 hrs
    26 JulySIAC closure for escape ramp worksClosed all day
    27 JulySIAC closure for escape ramp worksRe-opens 15:00 hrs
    28 JulySIAC closure for escape ramp works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    29 JulyNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    30 JulySIAC closure for escape ramp works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    31 JulySIAC closure for escape ramp works20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs

    Note: No other notified dates from SIAC after this.

    05 AugustNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    12 AugustNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs

    Blackwall Tunnels planned closures 1997 (as at 24 July 1997)

    Northbound Tunnel

    Date

    Reason for closing

    Time closed

    19 AugustNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    26 AugustNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    02 SeptemberNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    09 SeptemberNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    16 SeptemberNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    23 SeptemberNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    30 SeptemberNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    07 OctoberNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    14 OctoberNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    21 OctoberNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    28 OctoberNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    4 NovemberNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    11 NovemberNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    18 NovemberNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    25 NovemberNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    02 DecemberNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs
    09 DecemberNormal maintenance closure20:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs

    Southbound Tunnel (Maintenance Works)

    Normal twice weekly lane closures throughout year— 00:00 hrs to 05:00 hrs.

    Tunnel remains open on one lane working:

    • 01 January
    • 02 January
    • 08 January
    • 09 January
    • 15 January
    • 16 January
    • 22 January
    • 23 January
    • 29 January
    • 30 January
    • 05 February
    • 06 February
    • 12 February
    • 13 February
    • 19 February
    • 20 February
    • 26 February
    • 27 February
    • 05 March
    • 06 March
    • 12 March
    • 13 March
    • 19 March
    • 20 March
    • 26 March
    • 27 March
    • 02 April
    • 03 April
    • 09 April
    • 10 April
    • 16 April
    • 17 April
    • 23 April
    • 24 April
    • 30 April
    • 01 May
    • 07 May
    • 08 May
    • 14 May
    • 15 May
    • 21 May
    • 22 May
    • 28 May
    • 29 May
    • 04 June
    • 05 June
    • 11 June
    • 12 June
    • 18 June
    • 19 June
    • 25 June
    • 26 June
    • 02 July
    • 03 July
    • 09 July
    • 10 July
    • 16 July
    • 06 August
    • 07 August
    • 13 August
    • 14 August
    • 20 August
    • 21 August
    • 27 August
    • 28 August
    • 03 September
    • 04 September
    • 10 September
    • 11 September
    • 17 September
    • 18 September
    • 24 September
    • 25 September
    • 01 October
    • 02 October
    • 08 October
    • 09 October
    • 15 October
    • 16 October
    • 22 October
    • 23 October
    • 29 October
    • 30 October
    • 05 November
    • 06 November
    • 12 November
    • 13 November
    • 19 November
    • 20 November
    • 26 November
    • 27 November
    • 03 December
    • 04 December
    • 10 December
    • 11 December

    Following are complete closures of southbound tunnel:

    Date

    Reason for closing

    Time closed

    01 March (Sat)Twice yearly planned maintenanceClosure 21:00 to 05:00 hrs
    08 March (Sat)do.do.
    15 March (Sat)do.do.
    26 September (Sat)do.do.
    27 September (Sat)do.do.
    03 October (Fri)do.do.
    04 October (Sat)do.do.
    10 October (Fri)do.do.
    11 October (Sat)do.do.

    Chewing Gum As Litter

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether in view of the continuing public disregard of the law governing the proper disposal of litter, including chewing gum, they will (a) estimate the annual cost of cleaning pavements in major cities in the United Kingdom; (b) confirm that it is an offence to drop chewing gum on the pavement; and (c) consider legislation to make manufacturers of chewing gum partially liable for the cost of its removal.

    Information on the cost of cleaning pavements in major cities in the United Kingdom is not collected centrally. The estimated cost of street cleansing for London Boroughs, the City of London and English Metropolitan Districts in 1997–98 is £158 million.It is an offence under Section 87 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 to drop anything in a public place which causes the defacement of that place by litter. It is for the courts to decide in the circumstances of the case whether the dropping of chewing gum constituted a littering offence.The Tidy Britain Group, which is largely funded by the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, is currently working with a major chewing gum manufacturer to establish both effective cleansing methods and ways of reducing the problem in the first place. We have no plans for the kind of legislation which the noble Lord has suggested.

    Marine Special Areas Of Conservation

    asked Her Majesty's Government:When they will publish the criteria which were used to identify existing marine Special Areas of Conservation.

    Annex III to the Habitats Directive contains the criteria to be applied to the selection of sites. The list for consultation published in March 1995 contained an account of the way these criteria have been applied in the UK. Both documents are available in the Library. Further explanatory material will be published in due course.

    Discharges Of Dangerous Substances Into Controlled Waters

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What plans they have to introduce further environmental quality standards for the discharges of dangerous substances into controlled waters.

    A consultation paper proposing environmental quality standards for 13 dangerous substances, as defined in Directive 76/464/EEC on pollution caused by certain dangerous substances discharged into the aquatic environment of the Community, was issued by the department in March. It is planned to bring regulations containing these standards before the House shortly. In addition, we have today placed in the Library of the House a consultation paper proposing standards for a further 21 dangerous substances. These substances are:

    • 4-chloro-3-methyl-phenol
    • 2-chlorophenol
    • 2, 4-dichlorophenol
    • 2, 4 D(ester and non ester)
    • 1, 1 ,1-trichloroethane
    • 1, 1 ,2-trichloroethane
    • bentazone
    • benzene
    • biphenyl
    • chloronitrotoluenes
    • demeton
    • dimethoate
    • linuron
    • MCPA
    • mecoprop
    • mevinphos
    • naphthalene
    • omethoate
    • toluene
    • triazaphos
    • xylene

    Partnership For Peace Exercises: Funding

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many of the exercises conducted by NATO under the Partnership For Peace programmes are funded in whole or in part directly by the United States and not through NATO channels, and what oversight does NATO have of the proposed participants, scenarios and related matters.

    NATO-directed Partnership for Peace (PfP) exercises are open to all Allied and Partner nations. Exercise proposals and plans are approved by NATO. Costs are borne by participating nations, and by NATO common funding. Twenty-three such exercises are planned for this year.In addition, there are a wide range of activities "in the spirit of PfP. These will not he open to all Allies and Partners. Funding, planning and conduct are the responsibility of participating nations. There are likely to be about 20 such activities this year, many of which are made possible by the generous support of the United States.

    Gulf War Illness: Group Captain Coker's Findings

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the original research paper containing Group Captain Coker's findings that was submitted to the Gulf War inquiry on posting will be published; and, if so, whether they will place a copy of the paper in the Library of the House.

    Group Captain Coker published a paper on the results from the first 284 patients seen by the MoD's Medical Assessment Programme (MAP) in the Summer 1996 edition of the Journal of the Royal Naval Medical Service (A Review of Gulf War Illness J roy nav med Serv 1996; 82: 141–146). In late 1996 he prepared the first draft of a paper concerning the results from some 500 MAP patients. Work on this draft paper was never completed.However, doctors at the MAP have now seen 1,435 patients and the Government have undertaken to publish detailed results from the programme later this year. Group Captain Coker will be closely involved with this work, which will supersede his earlier draft paper. A copy of this will be placed in the Library of the House when completed and published.