Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 584: debated on Monday 12 January 1998

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

Monday, 12th January 1998.

Health Service Chairmen And Directors

asked Her Majesty's Government:How many NHS Trust appointments, of (a) chairmen; and (b) non-executive directors, are due to be made either to re-appoint or to replace those whose terms of office ended on or before 31 October or 30 November; and how many appointments in each category are not yet made; andFurther to the Written Answer by Baroness Jay of Paddington on 11 December

(WA 59), what was the total number of:

(a) NHS Trust chairmen; and

(b) non-executive directors,

to be appointed or re-appointed on 31 October or 30 November.

One hundred and sixty five National Health Service trust chairman and 829 non-executive director appointments were to be made by 1 December. Of these 34 chairman and 192 non-executive director appointments still had to be formally confirmed on 18 December.

Risk Factors

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will publish the risk factors relating to:

  • (a) eating any cut of British beef;
  • (b) eating British beef on the bone;
  • (c) food poisoning;
  • (d) choking on food;
  • (e) being involved in a road accident;
  • (f) drinking alcohol above recommended safe limits;
  • (g) death or injury during childbirth;
  • (h) smoking;
  • (i) death or disease from sexual activity.
  • Risk factors can be interpreted in more than one way. First, there are the factors which predispose an individual to a risk which can include genetic makeup, gender, behaviour, environment—including social and economic factors, age and pre-existing illness. Some commentators tend to quote figures in order to compare risks. Many have become wary of making such comparisons for a number of reasons; because it is often impossible to compare like with like and because there are different perceptions of the risk, but also because different risks affect different sections of the population and because some risks are voluntarily accepted. In some cases the extent of the risks is simply not known.In its advice to Ministers the Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee (SEAC) said that using pessimistic assumptions concerning the various factors involved in the transmission of BSE to humans it is estimated that the risk from the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) in food is now very small. On the basis of the risk assessment available to the committee it estimated that there is a 95 per cent. chance of no cases and a five per cent. chance of one case of new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease arising as a result of this exposure inLine listings of general foodborne outbreaks in England and Wales are published on a quarterly basis in the Public Health Laboratory Services Communicable Disease Report

    CDR Weekly. Information on contributory factors associated with reported general outbreaks in England and Wales for the period 1992–1994 can be found in the CDR Review. Copies of these publications are available in the Library.

    There were 286 deaths in England and Wales in 1996 from choking on a foreign body, however it is not recorded how many of these were food related.

    There were 3,621 deaths and over 300,000 injuries from road traffic accidents in the United Kingdom in 1995.

    There is no universally acceptable figure available on the number of deaths related to drinking alcohol because of the difficulty in defining the term alcohol-related. Estimates in the academic literature range between 5,000 and 40,000 deaths per annum and reflect a wide range of methods of calculation.

    The UK maternal mortality rate, as quoted by the Office of National Statistics, is 6.0 deaths per 100,000 maternities (1991–93, the latest figures available).

    The risk of an individual dying in any one year from smoking 10 cigarettes per day (all smoking related diseases) has been estimated as 1 in 200.

    Since reporting began in 1982 to the end of October 1997, there have been 9,114 deaths of people with AIDS reported to the Public Health Laboratory Service's Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, where infection was probably acquired from sexual intercourse. Deaths due to other non HIV/AIDS sexually transmitted infections are estimated to be about one per cent. of the AIDS deaths.

    Alcohol-Related Morbidity And Mortality: Costs

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the annual cost to the NHS of alcohol abuse and misuse among the following age groups: (a) under 17 years old; (b) 17 to 25 years old; and (c) over 25 years old.

    Estimates of the cost to the National Health Service of alcohol-related morbidity and mortality vary widely; the most recent academic estimate of which we are aware is reproduced in the table. It is not broken down by age group.

    £,million
    Cost to NHS
    Inpatient costs—direct alcohol diagnosis40.80
    Inpatient costs—other alcohol related diagnosis120.17
    General practice costs3.06
    Total164.03

    Source:

    Health Education Authority. Health Update: Alcohol (1997)—after Godfrey, C. and Hardman, G. (1994).

    Vitamin B6 Proposed Restrictions: Ministerial Consultations

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the Minister for Public Health was involved in, or consulted about, the proposed restrictions on the retail sale of vitamin B6 supplements; whether in the course of any such involvement she declared any family connection with pharmaceutical companies; and, if so, what was the nature of the connection.

    The decision to propose restrictions on the retail sale of vitamin B6 supplements was taken jointly by the Minister of State for Public Health and the Minister for Food Safety following advice from the Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment and the Food Advisory Committee. Paragraphs 109–129 of the Ministerial code require Ministers to ensure that there is no conflict of interest between their public duties and their private interests. The Secretary of State for Health is satisfied that there is no conflict of interest in this case.

    Community Health Services: Expenditure

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the cost to the NHS of antenatal, childbirth and post-natal treatment; what proportion this is of total NHS costs; and what is the average salary of:

  • (a) consultant obstetricians;
  • (b) general medical practitioners; and
  • (c) midwives.
  • Hospital and community health services expenditure on maternity services is shown in the table.

    Maternity Services £ million

    Maternity Services as a proportion of total expenditure(℅)

    Latest figures available 1995–96
    England11,207.65.12
    Northern Ireland258.85.5
    Latest figures available 1996–97
    Scotland3169.93.7
    Wales449.32.0

    1 The maternity services figure includes obstetrics (inpatients and outpatients); other hospital services; community maternity; health promotion; services to general practitioners under open access; other community health; ambulances and administration.

    2This figure includes hospital and community maternity and child health services.

    3This figure includes specialist and GP obstetrics services in hospital, special care baby units and community midwifery.

    4This figure includes obstetrics, general practice and common y maternity services.

    It is not possible to identify the average salary of consultant obstetricians, The current salary range for hospital medical and dental consultants employed on national terms and conditions is £43,750–£56,470.

    From 1 December 1997 the intended average net income for the average general practitioner is £46,450 per annum, plus approximately £3,000 a year for achieving higher levels of coverage for childhood immunisations and cervical screening. Midwives' salaries are dependent on a wide range of factors, such as grade and length of service. It is therefore not possible to provide the average salary of a midwife. However, current salary rates are published in Advance Letter NM1/97, copies of which are available in the Library.

    Parental Discipline

    asked Her Majesty's Government:In the light of the Written Answer by Baroness Jay of Paddington on 11 December (

    WA 56), when the consultation on clarifying the law in relating to parental discipline will begin; and which Government departments will be involved.

    We expect to consult in the spring next year. The Home Department, the Lord Chancellor's Department, the Department for Education and Employment, and the Scottish Welsh and Northern Ireland Offices are likely to be the main departments involved.

    Helplines

    The Government believe in the importance of providing information. The use of helplines is one of a number of communications methods which can be used. A recent example is the proposal in the White Paper The New NHS: Modern and Dependable to introduce new 24-hour advice lines to provide easier and faster advice and information through the National Health Service. We will pilot this through three care and advice helplines to begin in March 1998. We are aiming for the whole country to be covered by the year 2000.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Who was asked to tender for the CALM helpline; how the original contract was awarded to Network Scotland; and why the most used helpline in Britain—SANELINE—was not asked to tender.

    The contract was awarded to Network Scotland on the basis of value-for-money and fitness for purpose. This organisation has a proven track record in operating helplines on sensitive issues—most notably the Sexwise line, offering counselling on sex and emotional matters for young people; the National AIDS Helpline and the National Drugs Helpline. Four other organisations were invited to tender for the CALM helpline.The scale of the project required a European-wide invitation to tender for which there was insufficient time to meet the deadline of a 15 December launch.It was therefore, decided that this project should be managed by the Central Office of Information, which was able to organise a tender from suppliers assembled under a European Union framework agreement which had previously been established as a result of an advertisement for direct marketing services to government in the Official Journal of European Tenders. SANELINE do not appear on the framework list and were therefore ineligible for consideration.

    Care Of The Mentally Iii

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they intend to amalgamate the health and social services budgets for the provision of the mentally ill in light of the seven reports over 30 years that have all concluded this would provide for a more efficient service for the mentally ill.

    We are keen to develop closer working between health and social services. The National Health Service White Paper, A New NHS, introduces a number of steps to promote closer working, including plans to strengthen the duty of partnership between all parts of the NHS and social services, new provision for local authority chief executives to participate in health authority meetings, and a requirement that joint investment plans be produced from 1999–2000 for continuing community care, including mental health.We will consult during 1998 on further ways of achieving closer local working relationships, including joint operation and planning of budgets.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the total NHS expenditure on private in-patient care for NHS psychiatric patients requiring in-patient psychiatric care but for whom there are no beds available.

    As the grounds for referral of a patient to a private in-patient facility are not simply based on the availability or otherwise of a National Health Service bed. it is not possible to say what the expenditure might be in the circumstances outlined.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How much money is being released from community care funds following the death of former long-stay patients placed in the community; and whether the money has been directed towards the care of new long-term patients.

    :The net reduction in the 1997–98 Old Long Stay (OLS) special allocation, which funds the care in England of patients with mental illness admitted to hospital before 1 January 1971 and patients with learning disabilities admitted before 1 January 1970, was £20 million. Patient deaths is one of the factors in this net reduction but this element is not separately identified in the information held centrally.1997–98 general allocations to health authorities were enhanced by this £20 million to ensure that spending on mental health and people with learning difficulties could be maintained. For 1998–99 no reductions were made in the OLS special allocation to health authorities.

    Judgments: Legal Databases

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they permit judgments of United Kingdom courts to be reported on legal databases in a manner that indicates whether such judgments have been over-ruled or distinguished in subsequent judgments; and, if not, why not.

    There are no government restrictions imposed upon the reporting of judgments of United Kingdom courts on legal databases. It is for database owners to decide whether it is commercially viable to include information that indicates whether a judge has been over-ruled or distinguished and government do not influence this.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What restrictions they impose upon the reporting of judgments of United Kingdom courts on legal databases.

    There are no government restrictions imposed upon the reporting of judgments of United Kingdom courts on legal databases.

    Public Record Office Charges

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What are the annual profits made by the Public Record Office for each of the past five years and the proportion of those profits attributable to income received from photocopying charges.

    The Public Record Office has made no annual profit in the past five years. Charges for photocopies and all other charges are set to recover full cost with no profit element.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What charges are imposed by the Public Record Office, per page, for photocopying public records; and how such charges are calculated and regulated to ensure that they are no more than is appropriate and necessary.

    The current charges for electrostatic copies from original documents are set out in the Public Record Office (Fees) Regulations 1997 (Statutory Instruments 1997/400) a copy of which is available in the Library.The charges for photocopying of public records are calculated on the basis of full cost recovery in accordance with H.M. Treasury rules. Full cost is the total cost of the service including copying costs, costs of sales and overheads.The charges are made under the provisions of the Public Records Act 1958 section 2(5). They are reviewed annually to take account of likely changes in cost and demand. Proposed changes are considered by the Lord Chancellor's Advisory Council on Public Records, agreed by the Lord Chancellor and H.M. Treasury and implemented by statutory instrument. Every effort is made to keep the cost of copying to a minimum. However the public records are unique and their nature and format often makes them unsuitable for conventional copying methods: considerable care has to be taken to ensure that they are safely handled in order to preserve them for posterity. In some cases specialised equipment and labour intensive handling techniques are required and these inevitably have an impact on costs. The office is gradually increasing the amount of material made available to readers in surrogate format (for example, microfilm, electronic image) so that more copies can be made by cheaper self-service methods.

    Human Rights Legislation Implementation: Judicial Training

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is their estimate of the total costs of giving training to members of courts and tribunals about the implications of the forthcoming Human Rights Act; and how it is intended that funds should be allocated for this purpose across the United Kingdom.

    The cost of judicial training in preparation for implementation of the Human Rights Bill is estimated to be £5.0 million: £4.5 million for England and Wales; £450,000 for Scotland and £50,000 for Northern Ireland. Continuation training will be provided after implementation as necessary.

    Consolidation Bills

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Which consolidation Bills they plan to introduce during the current parliamentary session.

    The Petroleum Bill has already been introduced. Three other consolidation Bills, on the Audit Commission, the Armed Forces and European parliamentary elections, may also be introduced, dependent on the progress of other legislation.

    Administrative Decisions: Public Information

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the citizen has a legitimate expectation that the Government and public authorities will generally provide reasons for administrative decisions directly affecting the citizen's rights and interests.

    The Government recognise that giving reasons for administrative decisions contributes to good administration. The current Code of Practice on Access to Government Information commits government departments and certain public bodies to give reasons to those affected by administrative decisions.The recent White Paper,

    Your Right to Know, proposes that a wider range of pubic bodies should be required to make "active" disclosure. Part of this requirement will be a general statutory duty to give reasons. The limitations on the duty will be the same as those on the corresponding duty to provide information on request.

    Whether under the present law there is a duty to give reasons in any particular case, or an expectation that reasons will be given, depends on the circumstances of the decision and is a matter for the courts.

    Arms Exports To The Netherlands

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they have approved an export licence for the supply to the Netherlands of shotgun ammunition intended for use in Bosnia.

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office
    (Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean)

    We recently approved the export to the Netherlands of 2,500 rounds of CS gas and target-practice shotgun ammunition for use in riot-control by Dutch UN armed forces in Bosnia. Given that the ammunition is needed to support peace-keeping activities in Bosnia and that it is important that UN forces in Bosnia, which include British troops, are able to protect themselves, we were glad to be able to approve this export as an exception to our interpretation of the EU arms embargo on the former Yugoslavia. This decision does not affect our continued support of the EU common position on arms exports to the former Yugoslavia.

    Us Missiles: Developments

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they consider that the work described in a recent United States Department of Energy document on upgrading and replacing the B-61 gravity bomb, the W-87 warhead for air-launched missiles and the W-76 and W-88 warhead for submarine-launched Trident missiles may amount to a breach of the provisions of the comprehensive test ban treaty and of Article VI of the non-proliferation treaty, for both of which the United Kingdom is a depository power.

    :The depository of the comprehensive test ban treaty is the United Nations Secretary-General. We have no reason to believe that any developments proposed by the United States are in any way in breach of their obligations under the non-proliferation treaty or the comprehensive test ban treaty.

    Weapons In Space

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they consider the siting of weapons in space should be a subject of preventive diplomacy by the United Nations or by any other party; andWhy successive British Governments have voted against or abstained from resolutions in the United Nations General Assembly on "preventing an arms race in outer space" (PAROS); and whether in future they will support such resolutions.

    We have made clear that we have no objection to re-establishing an Ad-Hoc Committee at the Conference on Disarmament on this issue. Together with other European Union member states, we abstained on the United Nations General Assembly resolution on this issue because we did not wish to prejudge the outcome of further debate within the Conference on Disarmament.I cannot comment on the position taken by previous governments on this issue.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they have given any undertakings to the United States not to object to its current research and development programmes for the siting of weapons in space as announced in the Quadrennial Defense Review and other official documents of the United States Administration.

    Turkish/Israeli Military Collaboration

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What information Turkey has given to its fellow members of NATO about the scope and purpose of its military collaborations with Israel.

    The Turkish Government has given no specific briefings to NATO partners on its military collaboration with Israel. However, in bilateral contacts, Turkey has outlined the areas in which it sought to develop its contacts with the Israeli defence forces. These include defence industry co-operation, and search and rescue exercises.The Turkish authorities have also made clear that their co-operation with Israel is not directed against any third country.

    Nato

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is their response to the United States proposals for the "transformation" of NATO (President Clinton,

    International Herald Tribune, 17 December) into an organisation which is globally active and United States-led.

    We are not aware of any statement by President Clinton on the lines referred to in the noble Lord's Question. However we agree with Mrs. Albright's remarks, quoted in the International Herald Tribune of 17 December that "the United States and Europe will certainly face challenges beyond Europe's shores"; "our nations share global interests that require us to work together with the same degree of solidarity as we have long maintained in the continent".

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether NATO, as experienced and supported by successive British Governments over recent decades, or the "transformed" NATO currently being advanced by the United States as an element in its own "global strategy", which would extend NATO's responsibilities into the Caspian Oil Province and into the Middle East, is "the bedrock of European security and a key component in our foreign and defence policies", as stated by Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean on 9 December

    (WA18).

    As I informed the noble Lord in my Written Answer of 9 December, we have consistently made clear our wholehearted commitment to NATO.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answers by Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean on 9 December

    (WA 17–19), whether it is now being proposed by the United States to its NATO allies that NATO's area of operations be extended to the Middle East and to dealing there with weapons of mass destruction; and, if it is so proposed, whether the proposal includes monitoring the uses Israel may make of its nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction, including chemical weapons such as those recently used by its forces in Amman.

    NATO has no defined area of operations and the United States has not proposed creating one.In her speech to the North Atlantic Council on 16 December, Secretary Albright expressed concern at the threat from the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. We share that concern and are strongly committed to preventing such proliferation. We shall pursue this vigorously in close co-operation with our allies and partners, with the aim of maintaining and strengthening the relevant treaties and supplier regimes.

    Iraq: Further Military Action

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they agree with the United States Administration that further military action against Iraq does not need further United Nations Security Council authority, or with the French Government, which says that it does.

    If Saddam Hussein reverted to a policy of obstructing UNSCOM operations, as witnessed in November, this would be a clear breach of Iraq's obligations under Security Council resolutions. We would continue to pursue a diplomatic solution but could not rule out military action as a last resort.

    Relations With Unconstitutional Regimes: Policy

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether their policy on dealing with regimes which came into power unconstitutionally remains as stated by Lord Carrington on 28 April 1980 (HL Deb, cols. 1121–1122).

    It does. We recognise states, not governments. We decide the nature of our dealings with regimes which come to power unconstitutionally in the light of our assessment of whether they are able of themselves to exercise effective control of the territory of the state concerned, and seem likely to continue to do so.

    Governments In Exile: Uk Support

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What criteria they apply in deciding whether to support governments in exile, either politically or financially; and why they have given ―130,000 to former President Ahmed Tejan Kabbah of Sierra Leone and nothing to former President Pascal Lissouba of Congo Brazzaville.

    where democratic governments have been overthrown by violence we have often worked with them in exile as part of our global support for democracy. Tejan Kabbah is not the "former" President of Sierra Leone; he remains the legitimate leader of that country, whereas the outbreak of civil war in June 1997 in Congo (Brazzaville) resulted in the cancellation of the presidential election and the subsequent expiry of President Lissouba's mandate in August 1997. Moreover, although the UK was a principal donor to Sierra Leone before the coup—and hopes to be again after the restoration of constitutional order there—we have not had a bilateral aid relationship with the Republic of the Congo for many years.

    Pakistan: Penal Code

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will propose that the European Union issue a demarche on the 25 year prison sentences passed against three Ahmadis under Section 295(C) of the penal code in Pakistan and on the use of this provision in the law in general.

    Our High Commission in Islamabad are investigating why Section 295(C) of the penal code was invoked in this instance, and the prospects for appeal. The EU raised its concerns about the situation faced by religious minorities and the blasphemy laws with the Pakistan Government on 15 December.

    Un Victims Of Torture Fund: Uk Contribution

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What contribution they will make to the United Nations Voluntary Fund for Victims of Torture in 1998.

    We intend to contribute at least £100,000 to the fund in 1998, a major increase over previous years contributions. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office's overall spending plans for the next financial year are of course, subject to parliamentary approval early in 1998.

    Palestinians In West Bank, East Jerusalem And Gaza

    Hylton asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean on 9 December (

    WA 19), what positive results, if any, have followed from the European Union dialogue with Israel about the Palestinian economy and the restrictions imposed upon it.

    The EU/Israel dialogue has proven to be a useful mechanism for engaging Israel on the problems facing the Palestinian economy. Despite substantive discussions, the dialogue has yet to produce the intended results on the ground. During our presidency we will work closely with Special Envoy Moratinos to ensure it produces results that enhance Palestinian economic well-being.

    Hylton asked Her Majesty's Government:What responses Israel has made to the request from the European Union and the United Kingdom to relax all restrictions on free movements of goods and people from the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza.

    Israel has removed most of the closure restrictions on the movement of goods and people it imposed following the Jerusalem bombings of 4 September. But significant barriers remain. We will continue to press Israel to remove unnecessary impediments to Palestinian travel and commerce. both bilaterally and through the EU dialogue with Israel.

    Mr Mordechai Vanunu

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether and when representations have been made to the Government of Israel concerning Mr. Mordechai Vanunu, his conditions of imprisonment, mental health and 18 year sentence; if so, with what result; and whether there has been any inter-governmental action on this matter.

    We have no formal standing to intervene in this case as there is no evidence of any illegality prior to his departure from the United Kingdom. Mr. Vanunu appears to have been treated in accordance with the normal judicial process in Israel. Nevertheless, on humanitarian grounds, we regularly raise with the Israelis the length of Mr. Vanunu's solitary confinement and did this most recently with the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs on 17 December.

    Caspian Sea Oil Reserves

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they are satisfied that the estimates of substantial oil reserves in the Caspian Sea are accurate and, if those estimates were to prove exaggerated, what difference that might make to the Government's policy in the Transcaucasus.

    It is generally accepted that the oil reserves in the Caspian Sea are substantial, but estimates vary considerably. Our principal policy objectives in the Transcaucasus are underpinning the countries' independence and territorial integrity, supporting efforts to resolve conflicts, encouraging political and economic reform. and increasing bilateral trade. These objectives are unaffected by the level of Caspian oil reserves.

    Vehicle Overloading On The M20

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many vehicles have broken down on the M.20 in the last three years as a result, or partly as a result, of overloading; and whether the incidence of overloading is markedly higher on this road than is usual.

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
    (Baroness Hayman)

    I have asked the Chief Executive of the Vehicle Inspectorate Executive Agency, Mr. Ron Oliver, to write to my noble friend.

    Letter to Lord Hardy of Wath from the Chief Executive of the Vehicle Inspectorate, Mr. R. Oliver, dated 22 December 1997.

    The Secretary of State has asked me to reply to your question about vehicle breakdowns on the M.20 as a result of overloading. The Vehicle Inspectorate does not maintain statistics relating to vehicle breakdowns but does maintain overloading statistics. These are recorded by geographical area rather than individual roads. Details of vehicles prohibited over the last three years for carrying overweight loads in the South Eastern Area, which would include the M.20 are shown below:

    1995–96

    1996–97

    1997–98

    2

    Vehicles

    1 weighed

    Vehicles prohibited

    Vehicles

    1 weighed

    Vehicles prohibited

    Vehicles1 weighed

    Vehicles prohibited

    17,00477313,3339746,437459

    1Heavy goods vehicles and light goods vehicles only.

    2 Figures for period 1 April to 30 September 1997 only.

    Health And Safety Laboratory: Annual Report And Accounts

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the Health and Safety Laboratory intends to publish its Annual Report and Accounts for 1996–97.

    The Health and Safety Laboratory has today published the 1996–97 Annual Report and Accounts, and copies have been placed in the Libraries of the House.

    "Pescado" Sinking: Maib Report

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they are now in a position to make public the report by the Marine Accident Investigation Branch into the sinking of the "Pescado" off the Cornish coast in 1991.

    The Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB) cannot formally complete a report while the matter is the subject of either a prosecution or an appeal. In the case of the "Pescado", the criminal prosecution of the owner and operator and the subsequent appeal process ended in March 1997.The MAIB is now completing its report. In accordance with the Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and Investigation) Regulations 1994, the final draft of the report will be sent to those whose reputation may be adversely affected. If passages in the report remain an issue, alternative text can be submitted to the MAIB within 28 days and these texts, if any, will be published as an appendix to the report. The report will then be submitted to the Secretary of State for approval to publish.

    Emissions Trading

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will agree to the setting up of a free market in pollution permits, as proposed by some parties at the Kyoto meeting on global warming; and, if so, what is their estimate of the effect this might have on the economic development of poor countries whose governments have sold off their permit entitlements.

    The Kyoto Protocol allows for the possibility of emissions trading, subject to rules and guidelines to be developed. The Government will be working with their EU partners and other countries to develop the rules for emissions trading to ensure that it becomes a useful way to maximise reductions, and not a loophole.The Kyoto Protocol only allows for emissions trading between countries with targets for the limitation or reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, which do not include developing countries at present.

    Railfreight Distribution: Terms Of Sale

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will place in the Library of the House a copy of the sale agreement of Railfreight Distribution to English, Welsh and Scottish Railways Ltd.

    No. The terms of the sale agreement between the British Railways Board and English, Welsh and Scottish Railways in respect of Railfreight Distribution are commercially confidential.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How much government money has been committed to English, Welsh and Scottish Railways Ltd. as part of the sale agreement to them of Railfreight Distribution.

    The net present value of cost of the sale to the British Railways Board is estimated at about £242 million. The biggest element comprises payments to Eurotunnel, to which BRB is in any case contractually committed.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How the sale of Railfreight Distribution to English, Welsh and Scottish Railways Ltd. complies with the European Community requirements for open access for rail freight through the Channel Tunnel.

    The terms of the sale were approved by the European Commission prior to the sale's completion. The Commission found that the sale terms did not unduly distort competition. Since then, we have secured from the French Government and Eurotunnel commitments designed to increase international railfreight not only by Railfreight Distribution but also by potential new entrants to the market.

    Memorial Land

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Under what circumstances, including any relevant statute, an area of land can become designated as "Memorial Land"; andFollowing the designation of an area of land as "Memorial Land", what conditions and restrictions as to its future use will result.

    As far as is known, there is no statutory definition of "Memorial Land" and thus no specific conditions or restrictions as to the use of such land. In general, a material change of use of land would require planning permission.

    Pyrethroid Pollution Of Watercourses

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many incidents of pyrethroid pollution of watercourses in England, Scotland and Wales have been reported to the relevant department in the past 12 months.

    In 1997 there were 11 confirmed cases of pollution by synthetic pyrethroid sheepdips reported to the Environment Agency in England and Wales.1997 data are not yet available for Scotland. However, in 1996 there were 13 incidents confirmed as due solely to synthetic pyrethroid sheepdips reported to the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency.

    The Government recognise that synthetic pyrethroids pose a particular threat to watercourses, and have reviewed the legislation regulating the disposal of sheepdip to controlled waters. As a result, the Government intend to consult in the near future on draft regulations designed to provide additional protection for groundwater.

    Thorne And Hatfield Moors

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether, further to the statement of Baroness Hayman on 17 November (H.L. Deb., col. 366) and the subsequent letter of the Wildlife Trusts of 10 December, they still consider that "parts of Thorn and Hatfield Moors have been included as candidates for Special Areas of Conservation", and that "it is only by continuing extraction to groundwater level that bogs will be re-established allowing the regeneration of the conservation interest."

    I can confirm that part of Thorne Moors is a candidate Special Area of Conservation.In my statement, I referred to the need to bring the level of peat close to the groundwater level to achieve the regeneration of conservation interest within peatbogs affected by commercial peat extraction. I was specifically referring to the water level within the peat mass (often termed the "groundwater mound" by hydrologists), and not the regional groundwater table. As the letter from the Wildlife Trusts correctly points out, the former is derived almost entirely from precipitation and is generally very low in nutrients. For this reason, the peat industry are required to leave a suitable depth of well humified peat (generally half a metre) above the mineral substrate to prevent nutrient enrichment from the underlying strata.

    Household Projections

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Of the projected 4.4 million additional households expected to be established between 1995 and 2016, what proportion will be generated by (a) young people leaving home as single people; and (b) family break-up; what will be the total cost of building new or converting old accommodation for those households; and how will this cost be shared between public and private providers.

    The projected 4.4 million additional households cover the 25-year period 1991 to 2016 and were published in 1995 in my department's document Projections of Households in England to 2016, a copy of which is in the Library of the House.The household projections do not identify household formation by the categories specifically requested. However, the number of one-person households formed by never married people is projected to rise by 1.85 million between 1991 and 2016. Of this projected rise, only 182,000 (just under 10 per cent.) are people aged under 30. The group of one-person households who are divorced or separated is projected to grow by 1.2 million between 1991 and 2016, with divorced and separated men representing two-thirds of this growth.It is the responsibility of regional conferences, made up of representatives from local authorities and other interested parties, to formulate proposals for the housing requirements in the Regional Planning Guidance (RPG) for each region, and the household projections are only one of the factors that they have to take into consideration in this process. Local planning authorities are required to ensure a reasonable mix and balance of house types and tenures to cater for a range of housing needs. It would not be feasible for my department to make the cost estimates requested.

    Eu Member States: Unfunded Liabilities

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What factual or estimated information they have of the total unfunded liabilities of each member state of the European Union; and in respect of any member state for which they have no such information when they propose to obtain it.

    Several estimates of the value of unfunded pension liabilities are available. For example, the OECD has published recent estimates of the net present value of public pension schemes for most of the member states in Ageing populations pension systems and government budgets: simulations for 20 OECD Countries. Economics Department Working Paper No. 168, 1996. Estimates and projections of pension expenditure by member states are available in Public pension expenditure prospects in the European Union: A survey of national projections, published by the European Commission in European Economy No. 3 1996. Copies are available in the Library of the House of Lords. Information on other unfunded liabilities for each member state of the EU is difficult to obtain and subject to considerable uncertainty. However the excessive deficit procedure and the Stability Pact are designed to ensure that member states cannot follow irresponsible budgetary policies. If a member state needs to address a build-up of liabilities of any kind, it will not be able to fund them through excessive borrowing.

    Deaths From Various Causes

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What were the number of deaths over a three-year period, up to the most recent date for which they are available, in each of the following categories:

    • road accidents;
    • hill-climbing accidents;
    • horse-riding accidents;
    • accidents in the home;
    • smoking related illness;
    • alcohol related illness;
    • sunburn related illness;
    • drug related illness;
    • AIDS (HIV);
    • influenza;
    • E. coli and salmonella poisoning;
    • CJD;
    • lightning strike.

    The information requested falls with the responsibility of the Chief Executive of the Office for National Statistics, who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.

    Letter to the Duke of Buccleuch from the Chief Executive of the Office for National Statistics, Mr. Tim Holt, dated 22 December 1997.

    I have been asked, as Director of the Office for National Statistics (ONS), to answer your recent question asking for the number of deaths from various causes for the latest three year period for which figures are available.

    The information requested is shown in the table below.

    Deaths occurring in England and Wales over the 1994–1996 period

    Number

    road accidents9,587
    hill-climbing accidents48
    swimming accidents422
    horse-riding accidents43
    accidents in the home9,094
    smoking related illness1360,000
    alcohol related illness12,577
    sunburn related illness24,133
    drug related illness37,657
    AIDS (HIV)1,616
    influenza492
    E. coli and salmonella poisoning197
    CID139
    lightning strike10

    1 United Kingdom, (based on the latest Department of Health estimate).

    2 Includes malignant melanoma of skin—unknown what proportion due to exposure to sun.

    3Includes suicides, accidents and undetermined deaths, as well as drug dependent and non-dependent abuse deaths.

    Millennium Dome

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Answer by Lord McIntosh of Haringey on 3 December (H.L. Deb, col. 1367), whether the total cost of £758 million attributable to the completion of the millennium dome includes the cost of internal completion and the setting up and installation of artefacts designed to provide the "experience".

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the companies that have been or will he contracted to supply the internal exhibits and fittings for the millennium dome will receive any share of the admission charges levied on the public; and if so, what share.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What terms they propose to extend to the commercial sector in order to encourage their participation in the creation of internal exhibits for, and fitting out of, the millennium dome; and whether tenders have been sought to this effect.

    The New Millennium Experience Company announced on 2 December that they had concluded contracts with the first 10 designers for the large scale exhibition structures within the millennium experience. They are Bentheim, Eva Jiricna Architects, HP:ICM, Jasper Jacob Associates, Land Design Studio Ltd., Media Projects International, MUF Architects, Park Avenue, Spectrum, and Work. In association with the NMEC, sponsors and specialist advisers, these designers are now developing further the design concepts for the experience attractions. I have placed a copy of the NMEC's detailed press release in the Libraries of the House. Since that announcement the company have also concluded a contract with Zaha M. Hadid. These contracts have been awarded as part of the competitive tendering process advertised in the 6 June edition of the Official Journal of the European Community (OJEC).

    Pharmaceutical Companies: Ministerial Code

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether any members of the Government have declared shareholdings or other financial links, either personally or through close family members, with pharmaceutical companies; and, if so, which Ministers have made such declarations and with which companies.

    There is no central list of the financial interests of Ministers and their close family members but paragraphs 109–129 of the Ministerial Code require Ministers to ensure that there is no conflict of interests between their public duties and their private interests. This includes not only Ministers' personal interests but those of spouse, partner and children who are minors.

    Proposed Freedom Of Information Act: Fees And Charges

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they intend that members of the public will have to pay the cost of photocopying documents when exercising their right of access to information under the proposed Freedom of Information Act; and if so, how such charges are to be calculated and regulated to ensure that they are no more than is appropriate and necessary.

    The White Paper Your Right to Know (Cm 3818) sets out in paragraphs 2.28 to 2.34 the Government's proposals for fees and charges under the proposed Freedom of Information Act. These include the requirement that any charges should reflect only reasonable costs; and that applicants for information would have a right of appeal to the proposed information commissioner about the level of charges made.

    Parliamentary Copyright

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they would support a review of the management of parliamentary copyright in the light of their current review of the management of Crown copyright.

    The responsibility for the management of parliamentary copyright rests with Parliament. A review of parliamentary copyright is, therefore, entirely a matter for senior parliamentary officials.

    Museums: Charges And Grants

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What was the admission charge for (a) the Natural History Museum (b) the Imperial War Museum at Lambeth Road (c) the National Maritime Museum (d) the Royal Air Force Museum (e) the Science Museum in London (1) the Victoria and Albert Museum (g) the National Museum and Galleries, Cardiff and (h) the Ulster Folk and Transport Museum when voluntary and compulsory charges were introduced; what it is now; and what is the percentage change of the charges since the introduction of admission charges.

    The information is given in the following table.

    Full adult admission charge at introductionYear of introductionFull adult admission charge nowPercentage rise
    Natural History Museum1£1 and £21987£6
    Imperial WarMuseum2£2.501989£4.7088
    National Maritime Museum£1.501984£5233
    Royal Air ForceMuseum3£31988£5.8595
    Science Museum4£21988£5.95198
    Victoria and Albert Museum5£51996£50
    National Museum & Galleries, Cardiff£11988£3.25225
    Ulster Folk andTransport Museum6£0.151964£42,567
    1 The Natural History museum initially operated differential charging regimes on two sites in 1987. A percentage comparison is therefore omitted.
    2 The figures are for the Lambeth Road site.
    3 The figures are for the Hendon site.
    4 The figures are for the South Kensington site.
    5 The Victoria and Albert Museum initially operated a suggested voluntary donation of £2 in 1995, which rose to £4.50 in 1996. A compulsory charge was introduced in 1996.
    6The figure quoted is for 1971. Although the Ulster Folk and Transport Museum began charging in 1964, figures for that year are not available.
    The prices quoted do not take inflation into account and represent the full single adult price. All museums operate generous concessionary pricing regimes and the majority of visitors do not pay the full price. Many gain free admission. Concessionary regimes differ from institution to institution and detailed comparisons would need to take this into account.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether there is any correlation between the reduction in Treasury grants to national museums and the increase in admission charges at those museums that charge them.

    Admission charges are a matter for the trustees of each institution.

    Museum Entry Charges

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the research carried out by the Museums and Galleries Commission into admission charges, whether they will carry out research into the effects on access, including effects at a national level and on local people and artists of (a) the levying of charges by public museums and galleries in the United Kingdom for admission to the permanent collections; and (b) the lifting of charges in those museums where this has occurred.

    The effects of both introducing and lifting admission charges have to some extent already been examined by the research carried out for the Museums and Galleries Commission.

    The effects of charging on access cannot be viewed in isolation. Other barriers to access such as opening hours, presentation and the cost of travel must be taken into account.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the statistical or other evidence used as the basis for Lord McIntosh of Haringey's remark in the House on 20 November that "there is evidence in Merseyside that customers have not been deterred by the [national museum] charges that were introduced in July [1997]" (HL Deb, col. 653).

    Initial figures from the National Museums and Galleries on Merseyside for the months of July and August 1997 showed a 2 per cent. increase in visitor numbers over the same months in the previous year. There are also indications that repeat visits to the same museum, and visits to more than one museum, have risen since the introduction of a charge for an annual ticket. However, the latest figures, for the four months July–October 1997, show a 6 per cent. drop in visitors compared with the same months in 1996. Data over a longer period are required before reliable inferences can be made.

    British Library: Mss Acquisition Budget

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the British Library's budget for the purchase of manuscript collections for the financial year 1998–99.

    Allocation of the British Library's resources is a matter for the British Library Board in the light of its various priorities. The board is currently reviewing its budgets for 1998–99, including its acquisitions budget, in light of the Government's announcement of grant-in-aid for the year and will submit its 1998–99 Business Plan to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport by the end of February 1998.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What was the central government grant per admission in the year 1996–97 for each of (a) British Museum (b) National Gallery (c) Tate Gallery (d) National Portrait Gallery (e) Wallace Collection (f) National Army Museum (g) Royal Armouries (h) National Museums and Galleries on Merseyside (t) Imperial War Museum (j) National History Museum (k) Science Museum in London (1) Victoria and Albert Museum (m) National Maritime Museum (n) Royal Air Force Museum.

    The information is given in the following table.

    Grant per admission in 1996–97
    Museum£
    British Museum4.87
    National Gallery3.75
    Tate Gallery7.57
    National Portrait Gallery5.73
    Wallace Collection10.34
    National Army Museum19.45
    Royal Armouries1.21
    National Museums and Galleries on Merseyside10.85
    Imperial War Museum8.23
    Natural History Museum15.25
    Science Museum8.13
    Victoria and Albert Museum19.29
    National Maritime Museum22.54
    Royal Air Force Museum23.21
    Visitor numbers for non-charging museums are often based on counting methods which are prone to error. They may over-estimate the true number of visitors by a significant amount. Comparisons between charging and non-charging museums therefore need to be treated with caution.In some cases the figures include visits to outstations museums as well as to main sites. No distinction is made at the Tower of London between visitors to the Royal Armouries exhibition and visitors to the rest of the Tower.The Royal Air Force Museum and National Army Museum are sponsored by the Ministry of Defence, not by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport.

    Museum Visits: Studies

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the research commissioned by the Museums and Galleries Commission into admission charges, whether they will commission research into the nature of the experience of a person's visit to public museums and galleries in the United Kingdom, including the subjective responses of individual visitors and data on visiting habits.

    The Museums and Galleries Commission (MGC) has carried out a public opinion survey concerning those aspects of museums which most interest visitors and in recent months has carried out qualitative research into the experiences of children on their visits and also those of ethnic minorities. The first two studies have been published and the third will be available shortly.These studies are part of an ongoing programme of research into museum visits. The quality of a person's experience when visiting a museum or gallery is of fundamental importance and will continue to be looked at very closely.

    Uk Civil Servants Working In The European Commission

    asked Her Majesty's Government:In respect of each ministry or department involved how many civil servants in the administrative grade are, whether on secondment or otherwise, performing duties in the European Commission and in which directorates.

    Most UK civil servants performing duties in the European Commission are seconded as detached national experts (DNEs), of which there are currently 105. In addition, there are currently 15 UK civil servants on short term placement within the European Commission. There is also a small number of UK civil servants who are fulfilling roles within the Commission as temporary agents. Most obtain special leave (unpaid) from their departments in order to undertake these temporary contracts. No figures are available for people who fall into this category. UK civil servants seconded as detached national experts or on short term placement are listed below by department (or ministry) and directorate within the European Commission:

    Cabinet Office
    DGII1
    Department for Education and Employment
    DGV5
    DGXXII2
    Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
    DGI1
    DGIII2
    DGVII3
    DGX2
    DGXI1
    SECRETARIAT-GENERAL1
    Department of Health
    DGIII3
    DGV1
    DGVII1
    Department for International Development
    DGIa1
    DGIb3
    DGII1
    DGVIII6
    DGXII1
    DGXVI1
    EUROSTAT1
    Department of Social Security
    DGV1
    DGIX1
    LEGAL SERVICE1
    SECRETARIAT-GENERAL1
    Department of Trade and Industry
    DGI3
    DGIa3
    DGIII1
    DGIV3
    DGXII1
    DGXIII1
    DGXIV1
    DGXV2
    DGXVII1
    DGXXI1
    LEGAL SERVICE1
    WASHINGTON DELEGATION1
    Employment Agency
    DGXI2
    JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE2
    Foreign and Commonwealth Office
    DGIa2
    DGII1
    DGXVII1
    CABINET1
    HM Customs and Excise
    DGXIX1
    DGXXI8
    SECRETARIAT-GENERAL1
    HM Treasury
    DGII2
    DGIV1
    DGXX1
    EUROSTAT6
    SECRETARIAT-GENERAL1
    Health and Safety Executive
    DGIII1
    DGV1
    DGXI3
    DGXII1
    Home Office
    SECRETARIAT-GENERAL1
    Inland Revenue
    DGXIV1
    DGXV2
    LEGAL SERVICE1
    Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
    DGI1
    DGVI4
    DGVIII1
    DGXIV1
    Minister of Defence
    DGVII1
    JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE1
    National Audit Office
    DGIX1
    DGXX1
    Northern Ireland Civil Service
    DGVI1
    DGVII1
    DGXVI1
    Office of Fair Trading
    DGIV2
    Scottish Office
    DGXI1
    DGXVII1
    DGXXIII1

    European Commission: Staff Assignments

    asked Her Majesty's Government:In respect of each member state of the European Union what is the number of their respective nationals working at A grade in each directorate of the European Commission.

    It is for the European Commission to provide information about the staff it employs and the way in which it assigns them. The European Commission does not normally supply information about staffing levels. However, some recent figures have been made available relating to administrative (A grade) officials. These set out the position as at 5 May 1996 (below). The most senior category is Al, the most junior A8.

    AlA2A3A4A5A6A7A8Total
    Belgium492410815092978492
    Germany721731541075414220578
    Denmark1715392510383138
    Spain5163890III6114124486
    France821681961408016231706
    United Kingdom720661221194611220512
    Greece2718418835494244
    Italy72057157924217936590
    Ireland2616342922342145
    Luxembourg13612852138
    Netherlands310244560296110242
    Portugal2812253951434184
    Austria23402039959
    Finland12443025948
    Sweden25523046972

    Tax Credits For Students

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether their proposed Earned Income Tax Credit will be available to full-time students who take part-time employment.

    Her Majesty's Government are considering introducing a "Working Family Tax Credit" which would build on the successful elements of Family Credit and be paid through the wage packet. The Government are considering all the options for their potential design and delivery.

    Alcohol And Tobacco Smuggling

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many detections of smuggling of alcohol and tobacco have been recorded in each of the last three years.

    In the past three financial years, Customs made the following numbers of detections of smuggled alcohol and tobacco goods:

    AlcoholTobaccoTotal
    1994–951,2191,7732,992
    1995–962,4322,0714,503
    1996–972,6333,9496,582

    Emu Accession Date

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether potential inward investors to the United Kingdom are made aware of an approximate date for entry into the Economic and Monetary Union; and an approximate date for harmonisation of British Standard Time (BST) with Central European Time (CET).

    As the Chancellor said in his statement of 27 October 1997, it is sensible for business and the country to plan on the basis that, in this Parliament, we will not enter a single currency.But, if the single currency is successful and the economic case for joining is clear and unambiguous, then the Government believe that Britain should be part of it. We need to prepare intensively during this Parliament, so that Britain will be in a position to make a decision to join EMU, should the Government, Parliament and the people so decide, early in the next Parliament.I understand from my right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Home Affairs that there are no present plans for the United Kingdom to move to Central European Time.

    Economic And Monetary Union

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they are prepared to make available funds to non-party and cross-party organisations seeking to engage in public debate on economic and monetary union and to put alternative views to those of the Government and European Commission.

    The Government have no plans to make funds available to any non-party or cross-party organisations seeking to engage in public debate on economic and monetary union.

    Benefit Integrity Project

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many additional interviewers for the benefit integrity project they have appointed and how many more will be appointed;What restrictions have been given to interviewers on the benefit integrity project and whether target figures for savings have been given or suggested;How many disabled people have been interviewed since the benefit integrity project began and what proportion have had their benefits cut or removed;How much money disabled people have lost and the Government gained since the benefit integrity project began; andWhat steps have been taken under the benefit integrity project to assess the amount of under claiming and under payment and with what results.

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Social Security
    (Baroness Hollis of Heigham)

    One of our key aims is to rebuild integrity in, and public support for, the social security system and the way in which public money is spent. We need to focus on those who are properly entitled to benefit. This is why we have set up the benefit integrity project. The administration of the benefit integrity project is a matter for Peter Mathison, the Chief Executive of the Benefits Agency. He will write to the noble Lord.

    Letter to Lord Ashley of Stoke from the Chief Executive of the Benefits Agency, Mr. Peter Mathison, dated 19 December 1997.

    The Secretary of State for Social Security has asked me to reply to your recent Parliamentary Questions regarding the benefit integrity project (BIP).

    The BIP was set up in April 1997 using existing staff from within the agency. The BIP is conducting a programme of visits to people receiving disability living allowance (DLA) at the higher rate of mobility combined with the highest rate of care. To undertake these visits the Benefits Agency (BA) currently employs 99 staff located in 10 disability benefit centres (DBC's) in England and Scotland. In Wales, 31 staff located at BA district offices have been trained to undertake the visits, as part of their duties. There are plans to increase the number of staff at Bootle DBC by one.

    The role of BIP visiting officers is to obtain an up to date, factual statement of circumstances from the disabled person; they play no direct part in the adjudication process. therefore, they have not been set targets for savings. It is important to stress that BIP is a measure designed to address incorrectness within DLA rather than stopping benefit. Adjudication officers are required to make the correct decision on any case they handle and have no financial target to achieve.

    As at 30 November 1997, the number of people interviewed since the BIP began is 5,348 of whom 10.62 per cent. (568) have had their benefit reduced or disallowed entirely. A further 22,163 people have been dealt with by postal enquiry of whom 13.19 per cent. (2,923) have had their benefit reduced or disallowed entirely.

    As at 30 November 1997, the total amount of weekly benefit payments identified as incorrect has resulted in reductions amounting to £150,603.00 per week and increases amounting to £10,744.80 per week.

    The BIP is only looking at DLA awards of the higher rate mobility component combined with the highest or middle rate of the care component, thus the scope for increasing awards is limited. However, any evidence obtained from DLA customers which indicates an increased need is placed before the adjudication officer and where appropriate that award is increased. To date 657 awards of middle rate care have been increased to highest rate care—amounting to £10,744.80 per week. There has been no assessment of the total amount of under claiming and under payment under BIP.

    Services Personnel: Chemical Warfare Immunisation And Disability

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many ex-service personnel and reservists known to be suffering from latent adverse effects of immunisation treatment against chemical warfare agents who have not been awarded disability pensions or grants have been awarded Disability Living Allowance and Disability Working Allowance.

    The information is not available. No statistics are maintained on recipients of Disability Living Allowance or Disability Working Allowance which could provide the answer to this Question.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many ex-service personnel and reservists known to be suffering from the latent adverse effects of immunisation treatment against chemical warfare agents have been awarded disability pensions or grants.

    No awards have been made under the War Pensions Scheme in respect of latent adverse reactions to either immunisation against biological warfare agents or prophylactic protection against chemical warfare agents. However, where any ex-serviceman or woman has any disablement, and where a claim for war pension is made in respect of that disablement within seven years of termination of service in the armed forces, the onus is on the Secretary of State to show, beyond reasonable doubt. that the disablement is not due to, or has not been aggravated by, service. Where she cannot do that, an award will normally be made.

    Benefit Claims Backdating Limitation

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What would have been the annual savings to the Department of Social Security if the regulations limiting the back-dating of claims for benefits to one month had been in operation from 1 April 1992.

    Child Benefit Lone Parent Element

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many individuals in the United Kingdom are in receipt of the lone parent element of child benefit; and how many there are in each parliamentary constituency.

    There are an estimated 1,100,000 families in the United Kingdom currently receiving the lone parent element of child benefit. This information is not currently available at parliamentary constituency level.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What would be the annual cost to the Department of Social Security if all lone parents with children under five years of age were allowed to retain the lone parent element of child benefit.

    Existing recipients will continue to retain entitlement to the lone parent element of child benefit. The estimated additional annual cost of allowing all new lone parents with children under five to receive the lone parent rate of Child Benefit is set out in the table.

    YearSavings
    1998–99£2m
    1999–00£8m
    2000–01£12m

    Note:

    All numbers are rounded to the nearest £1 million.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How much family credit a lone parent with two school-age children and in receipt of lone parent element of child benefit would receive if he or she moved into full time employment at an hourly rate of (a) £3; (b) £2.75; (c) £2.50; (d) £2.25; and (e) £2.00.

    The information requested is in the table. These calculations are based on a number of alternative lengths of working weeks, with one child aged under 11 and one aged 11–15. No allowance has been made for childcare costs.

    Weekly Family Credit Entitlement (Hours worked)
    Hourly rate16 hrs24 hrs30 hrs40 hrs
    £3.00£79.65£79.65£84.03£67.35
    £2.75£79.65£79.65£88.76£72.25
    £2.50£79.65£79.65£90.20£77.73
    £2.25£79.65£79.65£9020£84.03
    £2.00£79.65£79.65£90.20£90.20

    Source:

    The figures have been derived using the 1997 version of the Tax Benefit Model (TBM). The TBM is designed to illustrate the financial circumstances of a selection of hypothetical local authority and private tenants at April 1997.

    Notes:

  • 1. In addition to the assumptions set out in the reply, the TBM also rests on a number of other more minor assumptions:
  • (i) No tax allowances apart from personal allowances are in operation;
  • (ii) There is no reduced tax liability for spells of unemployment or sickness earlier in the tax year;
  • (iii) National Insurance Contributions (NICs) are paid at the not contracted out rate.
  • 2. Whether the family are local authority or private tenants makes no difference to the answer in this case.
  • 3. Maximum Family Credit (FC) for this lone parent is £79.65, made up of the personal allowance (£47.65) and child allowances (£12.05 + £19.95). When the FC claimant works 30 hours a week or more, the maximum FC is increased by the 30 Hour Credit of £10.55. giving a maximum FC of £90.20. The maximum applies where net income (gross income less income tax and NICS) is lower than the FC threshold of £77.15.
  • asked Her Majesty's Government:What would be the annual cost to the Treasury if 100,000 individuals in receipt of the lone parent element of child benefit were to move into full time employment and each one received the free services of a child minder for 20 hours per week at £2.75 per hour.

    The information requested is not available.Direct comparisons between out of work income and in work income for those lone parents currently receiving income support are difficult. It is not straightforward to predict the earnings of those lone parents who move into work, since this would depend on the type of job they might get, and for how many hours.

    Peers: Free Parliamentary Publications

    asked the Chairman of Committees:Which types of publications from the

    Daily List produced by The Stationery Officer peers are entitled to free of charge, including parliamentary papers; and at what cost level are peers likely to be charged for those publications which they are not entitled to receive free of charge.

    The Companion to the Standing Orders states that Lords are entitled to draw free of charge from the Printed Paper Office (a) current parliamentary papers and (b) other publications that "they clearly require in order to discharge their parliamentary duties" (page 58).Parliamentary papers are those presented by Command, laid pursuant to Act, statutory instrument or measure, or printed to an order of either House, and other working papers of the House, including the Minutes of Proceedings and Lords and Commons Hansard.Lords may also obtain free of charge non-parliamentary government papers or other publications (whether they are published by The Stationery Office or not), provided that they can show that they require them for the discharge of their parliamentary duties. Peers must pay the normal price for publications which they are not entitled to receive free of charge, which can, if published by The Stationery Office, be purchased from the Parliamentary Bookshop.

    Jobcentres: Registered Vacancies

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many vacancies registered at Jobcentres in the United Kingdom there are for (a) women over 25; and (b) women aged 25 and under, and how many there are in both categories by parliamentary constituency.

    The Minister of State, Department for Education and Employment
    (Baroness Blackstone)

    Responsibility for the subject of this question has been delegated to the Employment Service Agency under its Chief Executive, Mr. Leigh Lewis. The agency has been asked to respond to your question, and its reply is attached.

    Letter to Lord Evans of Parkside from the Chief Executive of the Employment Service, Mr. Leigh Lewis, dated 22 December 1997.

    The Secretary of State has asked me to reply to your question about the number of vacancies registered at Jobcentres in the United Kingdom for women under and over the age of 25 respectively. This is something that falls within the responsibilities delegated to me as Chief Executive of the Agency.

    I ought to say first that we do not keep statistics on the number of vacancies registered at Jobcentres in the format you have requested. Apart from the permitted exceptions under the Sex Discrimination Act 1976, jobseekers can apply, irrespective of their gender, for any of the job vacancies held at Jobcentres. Overall, since the beginning of April 1997, over 1.6 million vacancies have been registered with Jobcentres.

    As far as age requirements are concerned, the Employment Service has a long established policy which is that Jobcentres should challenge age restrictions placed on job vacancies and seek to persuade employers to consider jobseekers on their merits regardless of age.

    I am sorry I am unable to provide the specific information you required but I hope this clarifies the position.

    Social Security (Lone Parents) (Amendment) Regulations 1997: Si Committee's Consideration

    asked the Leader of the House:When the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments considered the Social Security (Lone Parents) (Amendment) Regulations 1997 (S.I. 1997/1790); and what was the result of that consideration.

    The Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments is a technical scrutiny committee which does not consider the merits or policy of statutory instruments. The Social Security (Lone Parents) (Amendment) Regulations 1997 were considered by the committee in its 10th Report of this Session (H.L. Paper 29). The committee did not draw the special attention of either House to the regulations.

    Electricity Generation

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What would be their best estimate of the additional cost on the annual average household fuel bill, for each of the next three years, of maintaining the proportion of electricity created by gas-fired generation at 1997 levels and requiring planned increases in gas generation to be replaced by coal.

    No such estimates have or can be made.

    Falkland Islands Garrison

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the annual budget for the defence of the Falkland Islands;What value or benefit it attaches to the Ministry of Defence's use of the Falkland Islands as an operational and joint services training facility; andWhat proportion of the budget spent on Falkland Islands defence it perceives to represent "added value" in terms of, for example, training opportunities not otherwise available in other theatres of Ministry of Defence operation.

    The budget for the Falkland Islands garrison is £74 million in the financial year 1997–98.The purpose of the British military presence in the Falkland Islands is to uphold the right of the Falkland Islanders to determine their own future. While there, British forces take the opportunity to conduct joint land, sea and air exercises in a challenging environment, and the RAF makes full use of the extensive facilities for low flying. This training is however designed to maintain the forces' high level of military preparedness, and is not regarded or costed as separable from their main purpose in being there.

    Gulf Veterans: "Rabbit Fever" Vaccinations

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many members of Her Majesty's Armed Forces who served in Operation Granby have "Rabbit Fever" (rabbit peroxinase) entered on their vaccination records; what was the purpose of the vaccine; and what regime is in place to monitor its effects; andWhether Gulf veterans who have "Rabbit Fever" (rabbit peroxinase) entered onto their vaccine records (B27) have been advised by a Ministry of Defence official that these records will be considered to be forgeries and the holders prosecuted; and what is their response.

    In the course of work in the Gulf veterans' illnesses, the Ministry of Defence received a copy of an anonymous vaccination record which appeared to show a vaccination for rabbit fever, also known as tularemia, as one of a set of five vaccinations given on a date in Janaury 1991. The record was passed to MoD officials via a Gulf veterans' group in response to a request by MoD for information about the implementation of the anti-biological warfare immunisation programme. It had an identifiable signature and unit stamp, which has enabled the medical officer who had apparently administered the five injections to be traced and shown the document. He has confirmed that two entries, for anthrax and pertussis vaccines, are in his handwriting and that he gave these injections; however he has stated that he did not administer any vaccinations against rabbit fever, and that the remaining three entries on the document, which include the one for rabbit fever, are not in his handwriting. It is his belief that these entries have been added subsequently.An unlicensed US vaccine is known to be available against tularemia. So far as the MoD can ascertain, this vaccine was not administered to UK troops during Operation Granby. However, the MoD will continue to investigate this matter as part of its fact finding work to examine the range of routine vaccines which may have been received by certain groups of Service personnel deployed to the Gulf.The individuals who had originally brought this document to MoD's attention were told that only two of the five vaccination entries were now regarded as genuine during a recent meeting with MoD officials. The MoD believes the document was passed to it in good faith and the matter has not been referred to the police.

    Operation Granby: Contaminated Debris

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What research is being conducted into the effect of exposure to depleted uranium and contaminated debris on members of Her Majesty's Armed Forces who served in Operation Granby; and whether any research is being conducted on Iraqi civilians who may have handled the debris after the cessation of hostilities.

    In the time available, it has not proved possible to obtain sufficient information properly to answer this Question.I will write to the noble Countess as soon as our investigations are complete and a copy of my letter will be placed in the Library of the House.

    Gulf Veterans: Medical Tests

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What tests and medical examinations have been conducted by medical assessment programme doctors on Gulf veterans since the inception of the programme and on what dates any changes were made; and whether they intend to incorporate any new tests into the programme, and if so which.

    In the time available, it has not proved possible to obtain sufficient information properly to answer this Question.I will write to the noble Countess as soon as our investigations are complete and a copy of my letter will be placed in the Library of the House.

    Depleted Uranium Ammunition: Handling

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What safety instructions have been and are currently issued to members of Her Majesty's Armed Forces and any civilian staff who may be responsible for transport, handling or use of depleted uranium ammunition.

    In the time available, it has not proved possible to obtain sufficient information properly to answer this Question.I will write to the noble Countess as soon as our investigations are complete and a copy of my letter will be placed in the Library of the House.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:When the Ministry of Defence applied to the Health and Safety Executive for official recommendations, guidance and usage procedures for depleted uranium ammunition.

    In the time available, it has not proved possible to obtain sufficient information properly to answer this Question.I will write to the noble Countess as soon as our investigations are complete and a copy of my letter will be placed in the Library of the House.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What training aids or other provisions, before the use of depleted uranium ammunition, were made available to members of Her Majesty's Armed Forces who served in Operation Granby and are currently available, whether for training or combat missions.

    In the time available, it has not proved possible to obtain sufficient information properly to answer this Question.I will write to the noble Countess as soon as our investigations are complete and a copy of my letter will be placed in the Library of the House.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether any risk assessment of depleted uranium contamination of British troops has been conducted and, if so, with what results; and if not, why not.

    In the time available, it has not proved possible to obtain sufficient information properly to answer this Question.

    I will write to the noble Countess as soon as our investigations are complete and a copy of my letter will be placed in the Library of the House.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will place in the Library of the House a copy of the August 1991 report by the Atomic Energy Authority on the effects of depleted uranium ammunition fragments left in southern Iraq after Operation Granby.

    In the time available, it has not proved possible to obtain sufficient information properly to answer this Question.I will write to the noble Countess as soon as our investigations are complete and a copy of my letter will be placed in the Library of the House.

    Camp Doha Fire, July 1991: Casualties

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many members of the 14th/20th Hussars, the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers and the Queen's Own Irish Hussars were present in the St. George's Lines, Camp Doha on 11 July 1991 and in the subsequent four days when a fire occurred in the British military headquarters; how many casualties were reported as a result of exposure to oxidised depleted uranium; and what regime is in place to monitor the possible delayed effects of such exposure.

    In the time available, it has not proved possible to obtain sufficient information properly to answer this Question.I will write to the noble Countess as soon as our investigations are complete and a copy of my letter will be placed in the Library of the House.

    Chemical Warfare Agents: Immunisation Effects

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many ex-service personnel and reservists are known to be suffering from the latent adverse effects of immunisation treatment against chemical warfare agents; and how many of these are female.

    In the time available, it has not proved possible to obtain sufficient information properly to answer this Question.I will write to the noble Lord as soon as our investigations are complete and a copy of my letter will be placed in the Library of the House.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they have examined the needs of ex-service personnel and reservists who have suffered latent adverse effects of immunisation against chemical warfare agents; and whether they will consult Sir Kenneth Calman, Chief Medical Officer, Department of Health, to examine ways of commissioning a report on the assessment of the optimum management of such sufferers and the current availability of specialist consultants for such management in each of the NHS regional centres.

    In the time available, it has not proved possible to obtain sufficient information properly to answer this Question.I will write to the noble Lord as soon as our investigations are complete and a copy of my letter will be placed in the Library of the House.

    Raf Tristar Maintenance

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the contract for the deep servicing of RAF TriStar Aircraft provides for financial penalties in the event of late delivery.

    The RAF TriStar maintenance contract includes a liquidated damages clause which allows the department to make a claim against the contractor should an aircraft not be delivered within the contracted turnround times.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they are satisfied with the arrangements for the deep servicing of RAF TriStar Aircraft.

    The five-year contract for the maintenance of RAF TriStar Aircraft is proceeding satisfactorily.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the cost, including crew costs but excluding contractor costs, of each rotation to Abu Dhabi by RAF TriStar Aircraft for the purpose of maintenance.

    The average cost of each rotation to Abu Dhabi, including fuel, and travel and subsistence costs for the crew, is some £24,500. These costs were taken into account during the commercial assessment of the tenders received for this work.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the servicing of RAF TriStar Aircraft at long distances from the United Kingdom creates any logistical problems for operational staff.

    There are no significant logistic problems for operational staff arising from the current arrangements for maintenance of the RAF TriStar fleet.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:On how many occasions during the last 12 months RAF TriStar Aircraft have been returned from deep servicing late or with significant defects outstanding.

    During the past year, work on five out of the six aircraft passed to the contractor for maintenance has been completed on time. One TriStar tanker aircraft has had to be returned to the contractor for rectification of an outstanding problem following major servicing.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What are the arrangements for the rectification of significant defects arising with RAF TriStar Aircraft within the United Kingdom.

    Rectification of any significant defects on the aircraft are undertaken by the maintenance contractor at RAF Brize Norton or. alternatively, at a repair facility within 1½ hours' flying time of RAF Brize Norton.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the deep servicing for RAF TriStar Aircraft at long distances from the United Kingdom has any effect on the operational effectiveness of the fleet.

    Current arrangements for the maintenance of the RAF's TriStar Aircraft are not expected to have any adverse effect on the operational effectiveness of the fleet.

    Raf Tristar: Operation And Maintenance Costs

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the total hourly cost of operation of RAF TriStar Aircraft and what proportion of this cost is devoted to maintenance.

    Based on current tasking, the estimated operational cost for an RAF TriStar Aircraft is some £7,000 per hour. Of this, some 45 per cent. may be attributed to the cost of maintenance.

    Ballistic Missile Defence: Studies

    asked Her Majesty's Government:When they propose to allow the release of the following studies commissioned by the previous government: (a) ballistic missile defence technologies, from a consortium of firms led by British Aerospace and Messrs. Lockheed Ltd.; and (b) the fundamental issues of ballistic missile defences, from Professor Neville Brown.

    The study into ballistic missile defence systems conducted by a consortium led by British Aerospace contains a great deal of information which remains classified. We do not therefore propose to publish it. We are, however, declassifying the internal Ministry of Defence report based on this and other external inputs. This will involve a considerable amount of detailed work but should be completed during Autumn 1998. Work on a declassified version of Professor Brown's fundamental issues study report is nearing completion. Publication of the report will be a matter for Professor Brown.

    Nuclear Weapons

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they are prepared to support the United States plans to target American nuclear weapons on so-called "rogue states".

    Neither UK nuclear weapons nor those of the US are targeted at any country. All members of NATO agree that the primary purpose of nuclear weapons is to preserve peace and deter aggression.

    Raf Northolt

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What are the main functions of RAF Northolt; the number of aircraft movements in the most recent 12 month period for which figures are available; the total area in acres of the Ministry of Defence property at Northolt; and the annual cost of the establishment.

    The main function of RAF Northolt is to provide the airhead for communications, and VIP and royal flying tasks, which are undertaken principally by aircraft of No. 32 (the royal) Squadron. The station is also host to a number of other units and is regularly used by other military and MoD charter flights and, on a repayment basis, by business aviation users. In the 12 months to the end of November 1997 there were 14,236 air movements at the station. The station covers some 490 acres. The total annual running costs for financial year 1997–98 are estimated at some £26 million.

    Multilateral Agreement On Investment

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the draft text of any multilateral agreement on investments has been or is to be published, and if so where and when; and which government department will be responsible for presenting it to Parliament.

    My department is responsible for presenting the multilateral agreement on investment (MAI) to Parliament. Copies of the current draft MAI consolidated text were put on the Internet at the OECD's site in October and in the Library of the House. The text is also available on request from my department and has already been circulated among interested parties including business and NGOs.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether it is their intention to sign a multilateral agreement on investment, such as is being prepared for signature next year within the OECD.

    It is the Government's intention to sign the multilateral agreement on investment, subject to the satisfactory conclusion of the negotiations. We support the general aims of the agreement and are working hard to achieve a successful outcome by April 1998.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether, if the proposed multilateral agreement on investment were to go ahead, it is intended to be accompanied by a standardisation of environmental, labour and human rights regimes worldwide.

    There are no plans to standardise regimes worldwide on these topics, whether in association with the multilateral agreement on investment or otherwise. Some aspects of these subjects are under separate discussion in other multilateral fora.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the provisions of the proposed multilateral agreement on investment are compatible with policy commitments to reduce pressure on the British or any other, including global, environment.

    The Government are committed to sustainable development and the protection of the environment. The multilateral agreement on investment will be compatible with this aim.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the purpose of the multilateral agreement on investment reputedly being prepared for signature next year within the OECD, and what is their relationship to the World Trade Organisation.

    I refer the noble Lord to my noble friend the Minister for Trade's reply on 4 November, Official Report, WA 279. The multilateral agreement on investment will be consistent with World Trade Organisation agreements; all seek to liberalise markets.

    "Millennium Goods": Trade Descriptions Act

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether tradesmen selling anything which could be described as "millennium goods" and which display the date 2000 AD will be liable for prosecution under the Trade Descriptions Act 1968.

    The Trade Descriptions Act 1968 makes it an offence for a trader to apply false or misleading statements to products. It is for local authority trading standards departments to decide whether to prosecute under the Act in a given case.I am aware that there are different views as to when the new millennium should be celebrated. However, given that the year 2000 is the year in which most people intend to celebrate, it would seem highly improbable that trading standards officers would consider prosecution appropriate in the circumstances described in the noble Lord's Question.

    Eu Members: Export Rights

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the European Union has the legal right to forbid a British export to a non-European Union country.

    Exports from a member state to a third country are part of the common commercial policy within the exclusive competence of the Community under Article 113 of the EC treaty, subject only to Article 223 of the treaty. This means that the Council of Ministers may make a regulation by a qualified majority of its members to prohibit a member state from exporting goods of a particular type; but the council cannot prohibit a member state from exporting military goods if the member state considers the export to be necessary for the protection of the essential interests of its security.The Commission is also empowered by Council Directives 89/662/EEC and 90/425/EEC (which are concerned with veterinary and zootechnical checks in intra-Community trade) to adopt any measures which may be necessary to safeguard the health of humans and/or animals. The Commission purported to act under this power in March 1996 when imposing a ban on the export of UK beef and bovine products to other member states and third countries, in response to the BSE crisis. The UK Government have challenged the ban in the European Court of Justice, arguing, in relation to third countries, that the ban exceeds the limits of the power delegated to the Commission by the Council. The advocate-general concluded in September this year that the third country element of the ban is necessary to prevent the spread of BSE and effect its eradication, and therefore the Commission had the necessary power. The court's judgment is expected in the New Year.

    United Bank Ltd: Industrial Relations

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they have received any representations concerning the compliance with EU directives and ILO conventions of the industrial relations policy of United Bank Ltd. (a Pakistan-owned bank operating in the United Kingdom); and what steps they will take to ensure that the Bank's industrial relations policy does comply with those directives and conventions.

    My department has received several representations from the Banking Insurance and Finance Union about the bank's decisions to derecognise it for collective bargaining purposes and to declare redundancies. The representations have not specifically referred to compliance with EU directives or ILO conventions. The bank is subject to employment law in the normal way, and there are remedies under the law if employees consider that the bank has failed to comply with its statutory or contractual obligations. The Government intend to publish a White Paper on fairness at work, and principally union recognition, in the first part of next year.

    Pregnant Women And Employment Law

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Baroness Blackstone on 2 December (

    WA 161) whether they are content with a situation where, under European Community law, a self-employed person can be obliged, in certain circumstances, to employ a pregnant woman and so incur some of the costs associated with her condition, even though there is no biological relationship between them: and, if not, what action they intend to take.

    It is unlawful for an employer to discriminate against a woman in employment matters on the basis that she is pregnant. Successive governments have accepted that statutory maternity rights and sex discrimination legislation contribute to competitiveness by helping to ensure that the benefits of women's skills, training and expertise are not lost to the economy when they raise a family.To qualify for statutory maternity pay (SMP) from her employer, a woman must have completed 26 weeks' work for that employer ending with the 15th week before her expected week of birth. She will therefore have worked for the employer before becoming pregnant. Any employer paying SMP is reimbursed 92 per cent. of the cost of SMP through deductions from national insurance contributions. Small firms may recover 100 per cent. of SMP paid plus 6.5 per cent. in additional compensation. We recognise that some individual employers may incur costs in holding a job open for a woman who is having a baby, and we aim to ensure that these costs are minimised, but we consider that they are outweighed by the benefits.

    Eu Internal Market Council, 27 November: Votes

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether in respect of the European Union Internal Market Council held on 27 November they will publish the detailed text of each political agreement, agreed common positions, proposals and directive modifications accompanied by qualified majority on that occasion together with particulars of voting by each member state.

    The department sends to the parliamentary scrutiny committees copies of all common positions. These do not differ materially from political agreements. The department also sends proposals and amending modifications put forward by the European Commission. The department will ensure that, in future, all parliamentary answers reporting the outcomes of internal market councils give voting particulars. At the 27 November Council, these were as follows:Action Robert Schuman agreement on a common position by a qualified majority (QM), with Germany, Netherlands and Sweden voting against.KAROLUS: unanimous political agreement.Legal protection of biotechnology political agreement by QM, with the Netherlands voting against, and Belgium and Italy abstaining.Amendment of Directive 83/189/EC to extend its provisions for regulatory transparency to information society services: agreement by QM on a common position, with Germany and the Netherlands abstaining, and Belgium opposing.Supplementary supervision of insurance undertakings in an insurance group: political agreement by QM, with Germany opposing.

    In vitro diagnostic medical devices: unanimous agreement by QM on a common position.

    Amendment of Directive 95/2/EC on food additives: agreement by QM on a common position, with Germany, Austria and Denmark voting against and Belgium abstaining.

    Coffee extracts and chicory extracts: unanimous agreement.

    Fossil Fuel Alternatives

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What plans they have to encourage development by new or existing companies to take advantage of new markets in alternatives to fossil fuel; andWhether they will ensure that manufacturing of equipment needed to develop renewable sources of energy will be located in or near regions which are suffering, or will suffer, from a reduced demand for fossil fuel; andWhether they accept the estimates of the recent European Commission Green Paper (COM 12109/96) on

    Energy for the Future—Renewable Sources of Energy that 1,250,000 jobs with annual exports of some £10 billion per annum will be created when alternatives to fossil fuel are introduced; and what plans they have to ensure that the United Kingdom will take advantage of these employment opportunities, particularly in the mining areas.

    The Government are undertaking a new and strong drive to develop renewable energy sources in line with our manifesto commitment. UK industry is well placed to exploit the growing market over the next decade and to take its share of employment opportunities.The European Commission has now published its White Paper on

    Energy for the Future: Renewable Sources of Energy, which makes similar claims to the earlier Green Paper. We shall be studying the White Paper over the coming months but we agree with the view expressed in the White Paper that net employment figures in the renewable energy sector are difficult to predict and calculate. It is also difficult to obtain accurate figures for current levels of exports, so the estimate of £10 billion of annual exports across the EC as a whole at some point in the future is difficult to verify.

    World Climate Research Programme: Uk Participation

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What steps they are taking to ensure that British scientists will be able to exploit the major investment of public funds already made in the World Ocean Circulation Experiment by participating in other elements of the World Climate Research Programme; andWhether they have made any representations to the Natural Environment Research Council concerning the decision to terminate the funding of the United Kingdom's component of the World Ocean Circulation Programme.

    UK participation in the international WOCE continues with NERC support at several Higher Education Institutes and also via the council's own centres and surveys. In addition, there is also UK involvement in a number of other WCRP programmes, including a new £3 million NERC initiative in Arctic science (ARCICE) which will provide a major contribution to the Arctic Climate System Study. The marine component of the ARCICE will address the role of Arctic deep water formation and air-sea-ice interactions in driving global ocean circulation patterns, extending and using the data sets collected during the field phase of WOCE. There is also joint funding for a possible future programme on Coupled-Ocean Atmosphere Processes and their Effects on Climate which is currently being explored with the Hadley Centre.Under the Haldane Principle, which governs our relationship with the Research Councils, specific funding decisions are properly for the individual council and its committees in consultation with its research and user communities. However, the noble Lord may like to be aware that the NERC thematic programme on WOCE came formally to its scheduled end in 1997: 12 research grants and 10 studentships supported under that programme have now been completed and a further three major research grants and five studentships are still running with committed NERC expenditure of around £150,000 in FY 1998–99. There is ongoing NERC support of around £1 million per annum for work related to ocean circulation and climate at the Southampton Oceanography Centre (SOC) through three major research programmes. The SOC also hosts, with NERC support, the International Project Office for WOCE—facilitating access by UK researchers to international results and scientific developments.

    Biotechnological Inventions: Draft Directive

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will set up an independent inquiry into the ethical, social, environmental and political implications of the draft EC directive on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions.

    The proposed directive on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions is substantially consistent with current United Kingdom legislation (the Patents Act 1977) apart from certain exclusions from patentability for ethical reasons. It is an Internal Market measure which seeks to eliminate uncertainties regarding patent rights in the biotechnological field, reducing the level of legal uncertainty, which may act as a deterrent to investment by the industry in Europe. Information concerning the European Commission's revised directive was circulated in July for comment to over 150 organisations and interest groups representing consumers, the research community, groups concerned with the social and environmental impact of biotechnology, members of the patent law profession, the industry and the Standing Advisory Committee on Industrial Property, an independent body set up to advise Ministers on aspects of industrial property. Consequently, the Government have not considered it necessary to set up an independent inquiry into the implications of the proposed directive.However, the debate which has surrounded the European Commission's proposal for a directive on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions has highlighted a number of ethical issues which surrounded this technology. Therefore, my honourable friend the Minister for Science, Energy and Industry announced on 24 November that my department would be sponsoring a consultation initiative to seek public views on biological research.The ultimate goal is to engage members of the public in debate to enable us to assess the issues that are of concern to a lay audience. However, it is an important precursor to involve interested parties active in the debate to add to the credibility that an inclusive approach will offer.My honourable friend the Minister for Science, Energy and Industry will be hosting an event in the New Year to discuss with groups active in the biosciences and science communication how we can best develop the public activity which is planned for next summer.

    Bleach Green To Antrim Railway Line

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Why there has been a delay in the re-opening of the Bleach Green to Antrim railway line; and when the line is now due to be opened.

    This delay has been due to the priority which was given to the upgrading of the Belfast-Dublin railway line and rolling stock. Current Northern Ireland Railway planning assumptions envisage commencement of work on the Bleach Green to Antrim scheme in mid-1998.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What action they intend to take in order to ensure that the European Union's agreed 75 per cent. grant aid for the Bleach Green to Antrim railway line is not rescinded because of construction delays.

    The current Northern Ireland Railway planning assumptions envisage commencement of work on the Bleach Green to Antrim reinstatement during 1998, which would enable the draw down of the EU funds within the life of the current NI Single Programming Document 1994–99.

    On-Line Lottery Games

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is their response to the statement of the Director of Gamcare (the national centre for information advice and practical help on the social impact of gambling) that their proposed ban of Pronto! lotteries is hypocritical.

    I understand that the Director of Gamcare, Mr. Paul Bellringer, has not made any such statement. On the contrary, Gamcare has welcomed the Government's announcement about the need to restrict the frequency of on-line lottery draws.The noble Lord may be referring to a remark made by Dr. Mark Griffiths, Chairman of Gamcare, which he made in his independent capacity as a psychologist at North Trent University. Dr. Griffiths was referring to the fact that gambling in the form of gaming machines is already available in public houses.The reasons for government action were made clear in the announcement by the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Home Office in another place on 13 November. The Government are not seeking to ban Pronto but to amend the legislation to restrict the frequency of on-line lottery draws for social policy reasons.The Government have pointed out that gaming machines in public houses are subject to strict statutory controls which ensure that they are an ancillary facility there. In contrast, there are inadequate controls over frequent draw on-line lottery games, which have only emerged since the 1976 Act was passed.The Government will shortly be publishing a draft Bill to restrict the frequency of on-line society and local authority lotteries. There will be an opportunity to comment on the terms of the Bill before it is introduced to Parliament.

    Litter: Offences

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many prosecutions have been pursued and how many convictions secured in respect of offences under the Litter Act 1983 in each of the last three years; and whether they consider this measure is providing adequate discouragement of such offences.

    Information on prosecutions and convictions under Section 87 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990, which replaced Section 1(3) of the Litter Act 1983, is given in the table.

    Number of defendants prosecuted and convicted for litter offences under section 87 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990, 1994–1996 England and Wales
    YearTotal prosecutionsTotal convictions
    19941,164952
    19951,101723
    1996626468
    Prosecution through the courts is not the only deterrent available to local authorities to deal with this problem. The Act also contains the provision for local authorities to issue a fixed penalty notice to a person they believe has committed an offence. Payment within 14 days of the notice discharges any liability to conviction for that offence. A survey of local authorities identified that of 886 fixed penalty notices in 1996–97, 762 were paid. In January 1997, the fixed penalty was raised from £10 to £25.

    Crime And Disorder Bill: Representations

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many representations in regard to the Crime and Disorder Bill they have received; and what proportion of these were hostile to their proposals.

    During the autumn, the Government published nine consultation papers on measures included in the Bill. One thousand seven hundred and sixty five responses were received. They revealed broad support for the measures in the Bill from the police, the public, local authorities and practitioners in the field. Information about the responses to eight of these papers (Tackling Youth Crime, New National and Local Focus on Youth Crime, Tackling Delays in the Youth Justice System, Reducing Remand Delays, Racial Violence and Harassment, Getting to Grips with Crime,Community Safety Order and Community Protection Order), including the number of responses to each paper and a summary of the main points raised, has been placed in the Library. Information about the consultation paper on the drug treatment and testing order will be placed in the Library as soon as possible.

    Crime And Disorder Bill Provisions: Monitoring

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What steps will be taken to monitor the implementation and the effect of the provisions of the Crime and Disorder Bill.

    Following their implementation, the effect of the various provisions of the Bill will be monitored through the regular collection of criminal justice statistics, special data collections and research exercises. The precise method of monitoring will vary according to the nature of the provision. The Bill permits a number of its provisions to be piloted. These pilots will be carefully evaluated to assist in the full implementation of the relevant provision.

    Electronic Monitoring: Pilot Projects

    asked Her Majesty's Government:When the pilot projects to test the new community penalties introduced by Sections 35, 37, 39, 40 and 43 of the Crime (Sentences) Act 1997 and electronic monitoring as a condition of bail will begin.

    The pilot projects started on 2 January 1998 in Norfolk and in Manchester City Magistrates' Court. The remaining courts in Greater Manchester will be included in the pilot scheme from 1 April 1998. The trials of electronic monitoring as a condition of bail will begin in Norwich Magistrates' Court and Norwich Crown Court on 1 April 1998 and in Manchester City Magistrates' Court and Manchester Crown Court on 1 July 1998.

    British Citizenship Application Refusals: Publication Of Reasons

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will ensure that persons whose applications for British citizenship are being refused are given the reasons for such decisions.

    Yes. This Government believe in greater openness in public administration, as we showed when we published the White Paper on the Freedom of Information Act on 11 December 1997. This openness is especially necessary where our decisions affect the rights of individuals. We have long been unhappy with the practice of not giving reasons when refusing some applications for British citizenship, and relying upon Section 44(2) of the British Nationality Act 1981 as the authority for not doing so. Since taking office in May, we have considered this matter in considerable detail. My right honourable friend is required to give reasons in a wide range of immigration cases and he can see no persuasive argument why his decisions involving the refusal of British citizenship should not similarly be open to public scrutiny. He has therefore decided as a matter of principle that henceforth reasons should he given in such cases.One immediate consequence of this decision concerns the appeal to the House of Lords from the Court of Appeal in the cases of

    R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Mohamed Abdel Moneim Fayed and ex parte Ali Fayed regarding the application of Section 44(2) of the 1981 Act. My right honourable friend instructed the Treasury Solicitor on 22 December 1997 that these appeals should be withdrawn. The effect of this is that the judgment of the Court of Appeal quashing the decisions made in 1995 to refuse these two applications now stands.

    It will now fall to my right honourable friend to decide the applications on Mohamed and Ali Fayed, on their merits, and he cannot comment upon them further at this stage. He also makes clear that, in reaching the decision on principle that reasons should be given in citizenship cases, he has not considered any of the original papers in the Fayeds' application.

    Asylum Applications: European Union

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will propose to other member states of the European Union amendment of the rules for determining the country in which an asylum application should be considered, so that an individual's total family and cultural affiliations with his or her community in a country would be taken into consideration on a discretionary basis, if the asylum-seeker wishes to settle in a country other than that of first asylum.

    The Dublin Convention, which determines which member state is responsible for asylum applications made in the European Union, already provides for member states to take account of family and cultural affiliations. Under Article 3(4) member states have full discretion, subject to the agreement of the applicant, to examine asylum applications that are not their responsibility under the criteria defined in the convention. Article 9 also specifically provides that member states may, for humanitarian reasons, based in particular on family or cultural grounds, examine applications for asylum at the request of another member state even when it is not responsible under the criteria in the convention.

    Asylum Applications: Osce

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will propose to the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe that, as a condition of membership of the organisation, states should agree not to adopt any geographical limitation on the applications for asylum they will consider.

    Applicants to the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe will continue to be considered on the basis of their willingness to comply with the principles as set out in the 1975 Helsinki Final Act. We have no plans to recommend additional principles in this area.

    Firearms Incidents

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer given by Lord Williams of Mostyn on 9 December (

    WA 14), what information in relation to firearms incidents in:

  • (a) each division of the London Metropolitan Police area; and
  • (b) the whole London Metropolitan Police area, was provided by officers of the Metropolitan Police to television journalists, for the production of two television news programmes in November.
  • The question of what information is given out by members of the Metropolitan Police is a matter for the commissioner. I understand that in recent months a range of information has been provided in relation to firearms incidents but that details regarding contact between individual divisions or officers and the media is not readily available.

    Taxi Licensing: Criminal Records Checks

    asked Her Majesty's Government:When consultations between the Home Office and local licensing authorities on the availability of criminal records to authorities during licensing of taxis and hire cars will be completed; and whether, when making decisions following consultations, they will make it their priority to safeguard the travelling public.

    The Government are currently reviewing the provisions relating to criminal records checks in Part V of the Police Act 1997. Our top priority in doing so is the protection of children and other vulnerable people. The local licensing authorities have given us their views on a number of occasions and they will be taken fully into account during the course of this review.

    Under-Age Sexual Intercourse

    asked Her Majesty's Government:(a) how many men were prosecuted in 1995 under Sections 5, 6 or 28 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956, for sexual intercourse with girls under the age of 16 years; and (b) how many girls under that age were provided with contraceptives by government-funded family planning clinics, in the same year.

    Information at (a) on prosecutions in England and Wales under Sections 5, 6 and 28 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 is given in the table.

    Number of males prosecuted for offences under Sections 5, 6 and 28 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956
    England and Wales, 1995
    OffencesDescriptionTotal prosecutions
    Sec 5Unlawful sexual intercourse77
    with girl under 13
    Sec 6Unlawful sexual intercourse195
    with girl under 16
    Sec 28Person responsible for girl—
    under 16 causing or
    encouraging prostitution etc.
    Information at (b) is not available in the format requested. However, the total number of female first contacts aged under 16 at National Health Service family planning clinics in England for contraceptive advice in 1995–96 was 51,400.

    Isle Of Man And Channel Islands: Human Rights Provisions

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they consider that they have international obligations to: (a) secure rights under the European Convention on Human Rights; and (b) provide effective remedies for breaches of those rights, for everyone within the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands; and if so, what steps have been taken by the Government to give effect to those obligations.

    The obligation on Her Majesty's Government is to ensure that the Crown Dependencies comply with the European Convention on Human Rights. All Channel Islands Laws and Isle of Man Acts are scrutinised to ensure that they comply with this and other international obligations.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the courts of the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands respectively have given effect to the European Convention on Human Rights in their decisions; and if so, in which cases this has been done.

    The convention has not been incorporated into domestic law in the Crown Dependencies. It is applied by the Island courts only in limited circumstances, as is presently the case in the United Kingdom.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the courts of the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands respectively are required or authorised to provide effective remedies for breaches of the European Convention on Human Rights by public authorities within their jurisdiction; and if so, how such a requirement or authorisation is prescribed by law.

    The courts in the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands are not required or authorised directly to provide remedies for breaches of the European Convention on Human Rights. People in the Crown Dependencies may petition the European Commission of Human Rights in the same way as people in the United Kingdom may do.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they have renewed the right of individual application under the European Convention on Human Rights in respect of the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands; and if not, why not.

    The right of individual petition was renewed on 3 June 1993 in respect of the Isle of Man and with effect from 14 January 1996 in respect of the Channel Islands.

    Justice And Home Affairs Council, 4–5 December

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will comment on the outcome of the Justice and Home Affairs Council held in Brussels on 4 and 5 December.

    My right honourable friend and my honourable friend the Minister of State represented the United Kingdom at the Council, together with my honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the Lord Chancellor's Department. The main matters dealt with were as follows:The Council agreed as "A" points, among other things, a resolution on marriages of convenience, the organisation of future work on revising the Brussels and Lugano Conventions on recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial, civil and commercial matters, and a joint action on a mechanism for evaluation of the fight against organised crime. Several regulations relating to Europol were also agreed, dealing with its computer system, its budget for 1998 and its relationship with third countries and international organisations.Political agreement was reached on a text of the "Brussels II" Convention on jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in family matters. The Convention will enhance procedures for the recognition of marriages, divorces and adoptions within the European Union. The text will now be considered further, taking into account any views expressed by the European Parliament, with a view to signature of the Convention by June 1998.The scope of the draft Convention on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters was discussed. This Convention covers the giving and receiving of assistance and evidence during criminal investigations and prosecutions. The Council agreed that the Convention would not contain provisions on cross-border investigation techniques, which would be the subject of a separate Protocol, along with provisions on search and seizure. Initial negotiations on the terms of the Protocol could begin under the United Kingdom Presidency, before the Convention itself was finalised.Discussion on the draft convention on enforcement of driving disqualifications revealed that a number of member states had unresolved problems which required further work. Progress on the Action Plan on Organised Crime was noted. Two elements in particular were touched on: finalisation of the Naples H Convention on mutual assistance and co-operation between customs administrations, which is due to be signed before the end of the year, and ratification by all member states of the Europol Convention, which is on course for early 1998.The Council took stock of the position reached on the draft joint action to establish a European judicial network, which seeks to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of current arrangements for requesting and granting mutual legal assistance through a network of contact points. It was agreed that member states would notify the Council informally of the contact points which they intended to nominate, pending a decision at the next meeting of the Justice and Home Affairs Council in March 1998.Some progress was made on the draft joint action on making it a criminal offence to participate in a criminal organisation. A number of difficulties still remain, particularly concerning the definition of the conduct to be criminalised. The joint action was remitted to the Committee of Permanent Representatives for further work.The Council agreed a draft joint action establishing a funding programme for training, visits and exchanges in the fight against organised crime (the FALCONE programme). The Council also approved a report on organised crime in the European Union in 1996, for submission to the European Council.The Council took stock of the position reached on a draft resolution on a strategic action plan for customs co-operation in the Third Pillar. In the absence of agreement on the territorial application of the resolution, the Council instructed the Committee of Permanent Representatives to find a solution.The Council approved a report on the internal and external threat from terrorism, for submission to the European Council; took note of a draft report to the European Council on drugs; and approved a report for the European Council on implementation of the joint action of December 1996 on approximation of laws and practices to combat drugs.The Council agreed in principle to amend the definition in the Europol Convention of "trafficking in human beings" so as to include trafficking in child pornography. This was necessary to enable the Europol Drugs Unit to collect and analyse data on the subject. At the request of one member state, the K4 Committee was instructed to ensure that Europol's remit was extended to cover terrorism as soon as possible, and at latest within two years of Europol beginning its work.The Council agreed that a further action plan should be drawn up making specific proposals for countering a recent increase in illegal immigration from Iraq. Justice and Interior Ministers would take stock of progress when they met informally in Birmingham at the end of January.The Council discussed the draft EURODAC Convention for exchange and comparison of the fingerprints of asylum seekers. Agreement was reached in principle on some outstanding questions concerning the storage and erasure of data under the Convention. The working group will now begin drawing up the technical specifications for the system.The Council also discussed a draft joint action establishing a programme for training, exchanges and co-operation in the fields of immigration, asylum and the crossing of external frontiers (the Odysseus programme). In the absence of agreement on the provisions concerning crossing of external frontiers, the Council remitted the issue to the Committee of Permanent Representatives for further consideration.The Council held meetings, as part of the Structured Dialogue, with Ministers of the associated Central and Eastern European countries (CEEs) and, separately, with Cyprus. Discussion with the CEEs centred on mutual legal assistance, particularly in the areas of extradition, money laundering and the Lugano Convention on jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. The question of illegal immigration from Iraq was also raised, as well as asylum matters. In the meeting with Cyprus, Ministers from Cyprus set out the measures that it had taken to combat money laundering and described the position in Cyprus with regard to illegal immigration and Iraqi refugees.At the Council, the Luxembourg Presidency hosted an informal joint lunch of Justice and Health Ministers to exchange views on drugs matters. The discussion highlighted the range of measures currently taken within member states to combat drugs abuse and the value to be obtained from the exchange of information and ideas.

    Freemasonry In The Police And Judiciary

    asked Her Majesty's Government:When they propose to respond to the Home Affairs Committee's recommendations on freemasonry in the police and judiciary.

    We had hoped to be in a position to do so by the end of November, but our consideration of the issue is not yet completed. We expect to he able to reply to the Home Affairs Committee shortly.

    Beef Sales: Regulation

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What checks are made to ensure that raw, cooked or processed imported beef over 30 months is not offered for sale in the United Kingdom.

    The Parliamentary Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
    (Lord Donoughue)

    The Fresh Meat (Beef Controls) (No. 2) Regulations 1996 prohibit the sale for human consumption of bovine meat from animals over 30 months old. Responsibility for enforcement falls to local authorities.

    Peanuts And Vitamin B6: Adverse Reactions

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What was the number of recorded deaths from adverse reactions to peanuts for the latest year for which figures are available; what was the number of deaths attributed solely to vitamin B6 supplements for that year; and what quantity of peanuts would be available (a) on general sale; (b) from a pharmacy; and (c) on prescription from a general medical practitioner if restrictions on the sale of peanuts comparable to those proposed for vitamin B6 were applied.

    There are no reliable data on the number of deaths from food allergies or as a result of the consumption of food supplements. However, reports from coroners' courts suggest that there have been two or three deaths from peanut allergy so far this year. We are not aware of any deaths this year attributable to the consumption of food supplements that contain only vitamin B6.The proposed maximum limits on the level of vitamin B6 in food supplements and in products licensed as medicines available from pharmacies and on prescription were based on evidence which showed the lowest dose to have adverse effects in humans to be 50mg per day. Because peanut allergies only affect a small proportion of the population it is not possible to relate dose and effect across the population or to make calculations equivalent to those used in the consideration of vitamin B6.

    Vitamin B6 Symposium: Government Response

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether Dr. Margaret Ashwell, OBE, who chaired the symposium on the safety of vitamin B6 at the Royal College of Physicians on 8 September, has served on the Food Advisory Committee; if so, for how long; whether she is involved with the provision of programme advice for the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food optimal nutrition status project; and why they have failed to accept the conclusions of that symposium about the inappropriateness of the committee on toxicity's proposed restrictions on the sale of vitamin B6.

    Dr. Margaret Ashwell was a member of the Food Advisory Committee from 1 November 1986 to 31 October 1995. She is currently programme adviser for the MAFF optimal nutrition status research and development programme.The Government have noted the views of speakers at the industry organised symposium on vitamin B6 on 8 September. However, it has every confidence in the advice of the Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment and the Food Advisory Committee that the level of vitamin B6 in dietary supplements sold under food law be limited to a maximum of 10mg per daily dose.

    Vitamin B6: Daily Intake Advice

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will list those "many official bodies.' reported on 24 November (H.L. Deb., col. 749) to have accepted that 50mg and above is a potentially dangerous daily dose of vitamin B6.

    The Food Advisory Committee (FAC), the Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM) the Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment (COT) and the EU Scientific Committee for Food have all accepted that intakes of 50mg of vitamin B6 per day must be regarded as potentially harmful.

    Vitamin B6: Consumers' Association

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the initial request that the safety of vitamin B6 be reviewed by the Committee on Toxicity came from the Consumers' Association; whether that association declared any interest in, or the receipt of any funding from, the pharmaceutical industry or any associated trusts; and. if so, which.

    The Consumers' Association did not request that the safety of vitamin B6 be reviewed by the Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment (COT). It expressed concerns about the safety of high dose vitamins and mineral supplements and in this context drew attention to the availability of supplements containing high doses of vitamin B6. The decision to ask the COT to review the safety of vitamin B6 was taken by the Government of the day in the light of the concerns expressed.The Consumers' Association did not declare any interests in, or the receipt of any funding from, the pharmaceutical industry or any associated trusts when expressing its concerns about the safety of high dose vitamins and mineral supplements.

    Vitamin B6 Controls: Consultations

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Which organisations and individuals they intend to consult about the draft statutory instrument relating to the regulation of general retail sales of vitamin B6 supplements.

    No decision has yet been made on the extent of the consultation exercise on the draft regulations to introduce the controls on dietary supplements containing vitamin B6. However, organisations representing interests likely to be substantially effected by the regulations will be included.

    Specified Risk Material: Controls

    asked Her Majesty's Government:When they will introduce further controls on specified risk material in Great Britain and whether they will apply to imports.

    My right honourable friend the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food received advice from the Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee (SEAC) in May that our existing controls on specified bovine material and heads of sheep and goats should be extended to cover the spleen of all sheep and goats and the spinal cord of sheep and goats aged over 12 months or with one permanent incisor tooth erupted through the gum. In addition, SEAC advised that all the controls should be applied to imports. We were pleased, therefore, when the European Commission adopted in July Decision 97/534/EC which provides for Community-wide controls on the use and destruction of specified risk material (SRM) and for controls on products of animal origin imported into the Community to ensure they are SRM-free. In reaching agreement on that Decision my right honourable friend the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food accepted that the Community-wide controls should take effect from 1 January 1998. However, it subsequently became clear that the decision would create serious practical difficulties, in particular for importers of pharmaceutical and medical products. The Commission therefore proposed a new decision to replace 97/534/EC which took account of these problems.The Standing Veterinary Committee has failed to agree on a new decision to replace 97/534 but did agree to postpone its implementation until 1 April 1998. As my right honourable friend the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food has made clear previously, however, he is not prepared to tolerate any slippage in the introduction of Community-wide controls on SRM. He has therefore decided, in the interests of public health, to introduce unilateral interim controls in Great Britain. He has accordingly laid before Parliament today the Specified Risk Material Regulations 1997 and the Specified Risk Material Order 1997. both of which will come into force on 1 January 1998. Together, these consolidate existing national legislation providing for destruction of certain bovine materials and heads of sheep and goats and extend them to the spleen of all sheep and goats and spinal cord of sheep and goats over 12 months of age. They will also prohibit imports of SRM except where they are for technical use. Imports of certain animal products for food and animal feed, including imports from EU member states, will need to be accompanied by official veterinary certification confirming that they do not contain and were not derived from SRM. Products manufactured before 1 January 1998 and those containing material derived from Australia and New Zealand will be exempt from this requirement.Equivalent legislation is being introduced in Northern Ireland to come into force at the same time.

    British Cattle Movement Service

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the progress on setting up the British Cattle Movement Service at Workington

    My honourable friend the Minister of State of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food is glad to report that refurbishment work has been completed at three out of the four buildings at the British Cattle Movement Service site at Workington. One building was handed over to MAFF in November, and a further two are being completed and handed over today. Work is now under way to equip these buildings ready for occupation. The fourth building will be handed over next year.My honourable friend the Minister of State of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food was also pleased to announce that we have appointed a director of the British Cattle Movement Service following an open competition. He is David Evans, currently assistant regional director at the MAFF Regional Service Centre at Carlisle.These developments are milestones in the important task of setting up the British Cattle Movement Service, which will run the new computerised cattle tracing system for Great Britain.

    Eu Surplus Food Scheme

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether it is their intention to participate in the European Union surplus food scheme in 1998.

    Yes. The European Commission has allocated the United Kingdom some £20.3 million to operate the Scheme during 1998. Approximately 10 million cans of stewed steak will be made available to local authorities and to charitable and other non-profit making organisations to distribute to those on income support, family credit, jobseeker's allowance (income based only) or disability working allowance, the homeless and destitute and those living in welfare hostels. The scheme will only involve UK intervention beef which contains no offal and will be from animals killed when they were under 30 months of age and is no different to the meat currently available in the shops. We are pleased that this surplus beef is to be put to good use.

    Animals: Intraspecies Feeding

    Majesty's Government:Whether they have received advice from the Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee on the practice of feeding animal products to animals of the same species.

    At my right honourable friend the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food's request, at its meeting on 2 December the Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee considered the practice of feeding animal by-products to animals of the same species. The committee's advice is being published in full, and a copy has been placed in the Library of the House.The committee did not consider that there was an immediate risk from intraspecies feeding. However, they thought it possible that TSEs might arise spontaneously in any species with a prion protein gene, and that if this were the case the practice of recycling waste as feed within a species could spread any resultant disease. The committee describes the risk here as small, but considered that it could not be discounted completely.The committee has recommended that the Government develop a strategy to remove this risk, taking account of practical enforcement considerations and alternative disposal options, and discusses it with EC partners. Although the risk is small, my right honourable friend the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food intends to accept this recommendation on a precautionary basis.Essentially this means that the current practices of processing certain types of waste containing porcine material and feeding it as swill to pigs, and using poultry and feather meal as high protein ration for poultry, will have to end. Before legislating, however, my right honourable friend the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food shall, as advised, consider the alternative routes for disposing of such waste. We are currently conducting a review of national animal waste legislation and intend to issue proposed legislation for consultation early in the New Year. That will set out our proposals in respect of pig swill subject to any further discussions in the European Community. My right honourable friend the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food shall use that opportunity to ask for comments on the other issue raised by SEAC's advice. Subject to those comments, he also envisages bringing forward legislation to ban the recycling of poultry meals as poultry feed, but wants to sound out Community partners first.This action to avoid any possibility that a risk which the committee described as "small" and "potential" means that consumers will continue to enjoy the highest possible protection against the risks from TSEs, and gives the assurance that pig and poultry products remain TSE-free.

    Mussel Seed Stock: Licences

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will continue to make available licences to take mussel seed stock for the purpose of ongrowing.

    This year licences have been made available on request to registered shellfish farmers in England and Wales to enable them to collect wild mussel seed for cultivation on registered shellfish farms. We shall continue to make such licences available and will be discussing the detailed arrangements with the shellfish industry and with other interests. Vessels licensed in this way will not count against the United Kingdom's objectives under the EU's multi-annual guidance programme.

    Bovine Tb In Cattle And Badgers: Report

    asked Her Majesty's Government:When the Krebs Report on Badgers and Bovine TB will be published.

    My honourable friend the Minister of State of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food was pleased to announce that Professor Krebs Report on Bovine Tuberculosis in Cattle and Badgers was published 16 December 1997, as was the Government response to the report.In November 1996, Professor John Krebs, FRS began a scientific review on behalf of the then Government into the links between bovine tuberculosis and badgers. His terms of reference were:

    "To review the incidence of tuberculosis in cattle and badgers and assess the scientific evidence for links between them; to take account of EU policies on reducing and eliminating the incidence of tuberculosis in cattle; to take account of any risk to the human population; and accordingly to review, in the light of the scientific evidence present government policy on badgers and tuberculosis and to make recommendations".

    Professor Krebs was assisted in his review by Professor Roy Anderson, FRS, Professor Ivan Morrison, Professor Douglas Young, Professor Tim Clutton-Brock FRS, and Dr. C. Donnelly, as well as by two research assistants.

    The Government are most grateful for the vigour and rigour with which Professor Krebs and his team have tackled their remit. They believe that their report represents the best available scientific advice across this difficult area which is of great interest both to farmers, whose livelihood can be badly affected by bovine tuberculosis, and to conservation groups. The Government are disposed to accept the recommendations in the report in principle, subject to further consideration of the public expenditure, legal and practical implications.

    The report concludes that the available evidence, albeit largely indirect, strongly supports the view that badgers are a significant source of TB in cattle; but that it is not possible to state how large a contribution badgers make to cattle infection.

    The main recommendations are that:

  • (a) the current policy of limited culling of badgers should end, and be replaced by a policy of no culling in most of the country;
  • (b) a trial should be set up in certain areas with a history of repeated occurrence of TB to quantify the efficacy and cost effectiveness of badger culling to control bovine TB. Culling of all badgers will take place in some of the trial areas on a carefully designed experimental basis. This will be compared with the culling of all badgers assumed to be linked with bovine TB outbreaks in other trial areas, and no culling of badgers in a last set of trial areas. The aim will be to establish a rigorous scientific foundation for policy in the future, which should benefit all with an interest in this area;
  • (c) outside the culling trial areas, there should be an experimental comparison of the effectiveness of different cattle husbandry methods in controlling bovine TB. The livestock industry should take the lead here, with help from Government;
  • (d) the Government's research strategy for bovine tuberculosis should be redirected, and in particular there should be new work on developing a vaccine to protect cattle against TB.
  • The Government recognise that the subjects covered by the report are of profound concern both to those in badger conservation groups, and to livestock farmers. Account also needs to be taken of the fact that bovine tuberculosis can be transmitted to humans, although the number of cases is very low because of measures such as milk pasteurisation. The Government are therefore setting a period of two months (until 27 February 1998) for comments on how the recommendations should be implemented.

    Fishing Vessels: Licensing

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they propose to make changes to the arrangements for the licensing of United Kingdom registered fishing vessels when implementing the United Kingdom's latest multi-annual guidance programme (MAGP IV).

    The existing arrangements for the licensing of fishing vessels will continue to operate subject to certain changes which are set out below.

    Segmentation of the Fleet

    The UK's multi-annual guidance programme will set for each segment of our fishing fleet objectives to be met by 31 December 2001. There will be eight segments as follows:

    • pelagic trawls and purse seines
    • beam trawls
    • demersal and nephrop trawls and seines
    • lines and nets
    • shell-fish mobile gear
    • shell-fish fixed gear

    distant waters subdivided according to whether the vessels are exclusively or predominately active in non-EU waters.

    small scale coastal vessels under 10 metres.

    The means by which these objectives are achieved will vary from segment to segment. They may involve restrictions and/or reductions in fishing effort or capacity or a combination of both.

    From 1 January 1998, each fishing vessel will be assigned to a single segment, based on the principal activity recorded as being undertaken in 1996. Vessels which are new to the fleet or those which recorded no fishing activity in 1996 have been assigned to segments on the basis of earlier recorded activity or on the basis of other information available to departments. The allocation of vessels to segments will be reviewed during 1998 to take account of fishing activity up to and including 1997. Departments will take into account information provided by owners where:

  • (i) the segmentation has been based on no recorded fishing activity;
  • (ii) a vessel is new to the fleet;
  • (iii) a vessel has engaged in a licence transaction as a result of which its fishing opportunities have materially changed.
  • Such information must be provided by 31 March 1998.

    Once a fishing vessel has been assigned to a particular segment its capacity and fishing activity will continue to be recorded against that segment until further notice. Vessel owners will however be free to change the pattern of their fishing effort within any segment subject to any limitations posed by their fishing vessel licences.

    Restrictions on Fishing for Pelagic Species

    From 1 April 1998 UK registered fishing vessels eligible to fish for more than 500 tonnes of pelagic species—herring, mackerel, horse mackerel, pilchards, sprats and blue whiting—will be restricted to existing vessels in the fleet which on 17 December 1997;

  • (a) held an existing category A pelagic (purse seine or freezer trawler) licence;
  • or
  • (b) held an existing category A licence and caught at least 500 tonnes of pelagic species in any of the four years 1994, 1995, 1996 and 1997.
  • Eligible vessels other than purse seiners and freezer trawlers will have their existing licences replaced by a new category A pelagic (trawler) licence. Any vessel which already holds a beam trawler licence will be permitted to continue to fish by that method.

    Vessels holding category A pelagic (purse seine or freezer trawler) licences or category A pelagic (trawler) licences will also be able to fish for demersal species and pelagic species other than herring, mackerel, horse mackerel, pilchards, sprats and blue whiting, subject to complying with any licence or other restrictions in force or that may be imposed.

    Any person who would not qualify for a category A pelagic (trawler) licence under the criteria outlined above but who considers that they should be issued with such a licence must advise the fisheries departments by 31 January 1998. Such applicants must:

  • (a) have introduced a registered and licensed vessel into the UK fleet during 1997 with the intention of catching more than 500 tonnes of herring, mackerel, horse mackerel, sprats, pilchards or blue whiting;
  • or
  • (b) have entered into an enforceable financial commitment on or before 17 December 1997 to introduce a fishing vessel intended to catch more than 500 tonnes of herring, mackerel, horse mackerel, sprats, pilchards or blue whiting.
  • Documentary evidence of such an intention or enforceable financial commitment must also be presented to the fisheries departments by 31 January 1998.

    Ring Fencing of Pelagic Licences

    From 1 April 1998 vessels holding a category A pelagic (purse seine or freezer trawler) licence or a category A pelagic (trawler) licence will be ring fenced. Anyone wishing to introduce a new vessel into the pelagic fleet or to modify an existing pelagic vessel may only do so by acquiring an entitlement to a pelagic (purse seine or freezer trawler) licence or to a pelagic (trawler) licence. Within the ring fence it will not be possible to undertake a single licence transfer which involves the placement of a pelagic (trawler) licence on a pelagic freezer trawler or purse seiner.

    Existing capacity penalties—10 per cent. for licence transfers and 20 per cent. for licence aggregations—will continue to apply to all licence transactions within the pelagic ring fence, as will existing restrictions on engine power and tonnage.

    However from 1 April 1998 the replacement or modification of purse seiners or pelagic freezer trawlers will be subject to a zero capacity penalty where single licence transfers occur or to a 10 per cent. capacity penalty where the aggregation of licences occurs. Any freezer trawler must be capable of processing at least 30 tonnes of pelagic species per day.

    As from today it will no longer be possible to aggregate white fish licences with pelagic (purse seine or freezer trawler) licences to undertake minor engine modifications. The provision to park licences on purse seiners or freezer trawlers for up to 2 years pending their replacement or modification will also be terminated from this date.

    As at present there will be no restrictions on category A pelagic licences being downgraded to ordinary category A white fish licences.

    The Recording of Engine Power on Fishing Vessel Licences

    For all licence transactions which take place from 1 January 1999 the fisheries departments propose that the engine power to be recorded on the fishing vessel licence shall be the maximum continuous engine power that is capable of being generated by the vessel's engine. It is further proposed that this provision be extended on 1 January 2000 to all vessels licensed before 31 December 1998. Where fishing vessels engines have been permanently derated, the derated engine power will be treated as the maximum continuous engine power.

    In parallel with the arrangements set out in the previous paragraph the fisheries departments will be undertaking random checks to ensure that the maximum continuous engine power of fishing vessels is not greater than that which is stated on the fishing vessel licence.

    Review of the Licensing Arrangements

    The present system of licensing has evolved over a long period following the agreement of the Common Fisheries Policy in 1982. It is the mechanism through which the fisheries departments seek to regulate both fishing activity and the size and structure of the UK fleet. Over the years the system has become highly complex in terms of the number of different licences that are issued, the conditions which are attached to the licences, the arrangements for transferring and aggregating licences, and the operation of capacity penalties and tonnage and engine power constraints which together exert downward pressure on the size of the UK fleet. Although a number of changes to the licensing arrangements have been announced today, I believe that it would be beneficial to undertake a more detailed review of the operation of the arrangements to establish whether they are necessary and if so how they may be improved. In undertaking such a review it is important to take account of the knowledge and expertise that lies within the fishing industry. To this end we propose that a series of meetings should be held with representatives of the principal fishermen's organisations and that a report on the conclusions reached be presented to Ministers. This forum will also be invited to consider what arrangements might be made to accommodate the recording of maximum continuous engine power on fishing vessel licences.

    Beef On The Bone: Seac Advice

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will publish the recommendations of the Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee with regard to the danger of eating beef on the bone.

    The Government published SEAC's advice in full on 3 December 1997. Copies are available in the Library of the House and on the MAFF Internet site.

    Agriculture Ministers: Consultation With Farmers

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether, having abolished the nine regional advisory panels to the Ministry of Agriculture in May, they propose to establish any alternative procedures to facilitate regular communication and consultation between the Minister and farmers.

    We have arrangements for consulting formally with a wide range of interests, including farmers, on a wide range of issues. These will continue. Additionally, Ministers wish to be available and accessible to farmers, and to consumers and all those who use, live and work in the countryside on their regular regional visits. This is part of our new approach to create a more direct, open and accessible Ministry.

    Vitamin And Mineral Supplements

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What plans they have to review the safety of vitamin and mineral supplements.

    The Government are concerned about the potential adverse effects of high-dose vitamin and mineral supplements. In view of these concerns, the Minister of Public Health and my honourable friend the Minister of State of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food have agreed that an ad hoc Expert Group should be established to consider the general principles on which maximum levels of vitamins and minerals in supplements sold under food law could be set. The Expert Group will review the available science, and recommend maximum levels for a range of nutrients if appropriate. The Expert Group may also wish to provide advice on the addition of vitamins and minerals to foods. It will report to the Food Advisory Committee (FAC), which will consider the group's findings and make recommendations to Ministers. The Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM) will also wish to consider the report as it may have implications for the way that medicinal products containing vitamins and minerals are licensed. The conclusions of the review will also be used to inform any discussions in Brussels on the possible harmonisation of controls on food supplements and on fortified foods.The Expert Group will comprise a number of experts from the Committee of Medical Aspects of Food and Nutrition Policy (COMA); the Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment (COT); CSM and FAC.In order to ensure transparency in the process, an observer from each of the main interest groups—the health food industry, the food industry, complementary medicine interests and consumer organisations—will be invited to meetings of the Expert Group. Interested parties will also be given the opportunity to make written submissions to the Expert Group. It is expected that the Expert Group will take 18 months to two years to complete its task.The establishment of this Expert Group will not affect the decision to introduce legislation to control the maximum level of Vitamin B6 allowed in dietary supplements.

    Agriculture Council, 15–16 December

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What was the outcome of the Agriculture Council held in Brussels on 15 to 16 December.

    My right honourable friend the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and I represented the United Kingdom at the meeting of the European Union Council of Agriculture Ministers in Brussels on 15 and 16 December.My right honourable friend the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food informed our ministerial colleagues of developments in relation to BSE, in particular my decision to ban from 1 January 1998 the import into the United Kingdom of meat from which the specified risk material had not been removed. This decision had been taken in the light of the postponement for three months of an EU-wide ban on such material. He also informed the Council of the prohibition which he had announced on 3 December in relation to the marketing of bone-in-beef in the light of the scientific evidence which he had received from SEAC.The Council considered and reached agreement on two animal welfare measures: one attaching welfare conditions to the payment of export refunds, which was adopted unanimously, the other laying down standards for vehicles used for the transport of animals. The latter was agreed in principle by qualified majority. My right honourable friend the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, with our Swedish and Danish colleagues, was unable to support the measure on the grounds that the standards of animal protection would be insufficiently high, and difficult to police. Detailed texts implementing this agreement will be considered early in the United Kingdom Presidency.The Council discussed at some length a Commission report on the impact of third country trade agreements on the EU's Mediterranean producers. My right honourable friend the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food insisted that, in drawing conclusions on this matter, the Council should have available to it an assessment of the trade benefits of such agreements to the EU as well as the impact on EU producers. The Council also considered a report from the Commission on progress in the negotiations on a veterinary equivalence agreement with the US. It noted that, although the conditions were not yet right for concluding that agreement, the Commission should continue its negotiations with a view to reaching a satisfactory conclusion as soon as possible in the new year.Amongst other matters discussed and agreed at the Council were measures on the granting of national aid to sugar beet producers in Portugal (Italy voting against) an extension of the temporary derogations for imports of wine from the US (Portugal voting against); rules governing veterinary checks on products entering the EU from third countries (by unanimity); and a proposal consolidating the drinking milk regulation (Greece and Denmark voting against).The Irish Minister raised in the Council his Government's concerns over the recent interruptions to trade between the UK and the Republic of Ireland as a result of UK farmers' protests at ports; but he emphasised the close co-operation which exists between the two governments in seeking to resolve this matter. My right honourable friend the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food stressed the absolute commitment of the Government to maintaining the rule of law and our intention to do everything necessary to allow the unimpeded movement of goods within the EU single market.

    Animal Product Imports: Imposition Of Controls

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord Donoughue on 21 July (

    WA 148) why they did not immediately implement a ban on the importation of all fresh meat and meat products that failed to come up to the required British standards on or before that date.

    On 30 July the Commission adopted Decision 97/534/EC introducing Community-wide controls on the use and disposal of Specified Risk Material (SRM) with effect from 1 January 1998. This Decision addressed the Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee (SEAC) recommendations to government by introducing Community-wide controls. When it became clear, in December, that the implementation of the Decision would need to be deferred because of its effect on the availability of certain medical and pharmaceutical products, the Government decided to introduce national measures requiring certain imported animal products for food and feed to be accompanied by official certification confirming that they do not contain and were not derived from SRM. These measures came into force on 1 January 1998.

    Beef Imports: Controls

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they intend to extend the ban on the importation of beef from the European Community to the importation of beef from each of North America, Australia, Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil, New Zealand, Botswana, Kenya, Madagascar, Swaziland, Zimbabwe, Namibia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina. Macedonia, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and any other non-EC country; and whether they are satisfied that each of these sources of beef supply satisfies in its slaughtering, breeding and health arrangements the standards laid down by the Government for the beef produced domestically.

    There is no ban on the importation of beef from the European Community. The United Kingdom's new controls on Specified Risk Materials (SRM) require certain imported animal products for food or feed use to be accompanied by additional certification confirming that they are free of SRM. This requirement applies to imports from all EU and non-EU countries other than Australia and New Zealand.More generally, all fresh meat produced in, and imported into, the UK, whether from other EU Member States or third countries, must have been produced in accordance with harmonised Community rules as laid down in Council Directive 64/433/EEC.

    Varroa Mite Control

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they are aware that on the Continent the Varroa mite, which attacks domestic and wild honey bees, has developed an immunity to Bayvarol, the only licensed product with which to treat bees; and what steps they are taking to make it legal for the United Kingdom beekeepers to use substances such as talc, formic or lactic acid which cannot be licensed as they occur naturally.

    The Government are monitoring the situation on the Continent but are not aware of any incidence of varroa mite resistance in the United Kingdom.The question of any application for authorisation of new veterinary medicines to control varroa mites is one for the pharmaceutical industry. No veterinary medicine is authorised unless it satisfies the statutory criteria of safety, quality and efficacy.Whilst the administration of unauthorised veterinary medicinal products is prohibited by the Animals and Animal Products (Examination for Residues and Maximum Residue Limits) Regulations 1997, the situation is different for non-medicinal substances such as talc, formic or lactic acid. The regulations prohibit the administration of such products only where, if transmitted to an animal product, they would be likely to be harmful to human health. These regulations are implemented primarily through residues surveillance programmes and it is likely that, only where residues of an unauthorised substance are detected, would further action be taken in relation to the use of that substance. In such circumstances the Government would take expert advice on the human health implications and any relevant information on the implications for bee welfare and the industry in general before considering further action.

    Beef Imports: Origins

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether all raw, cooked or processed imported beef is traced back to the origin of the animals' birth; and if so how.

    In common with domestically produced beef, there is currently no requirement for imported raw, cooked or processed beef to be traced back to the origin of the animals' birth.

    Bone Meal Fertilisers

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether it is permissible to use bone meal from beef animals on the garden, and if so, whether individuals are allowed to obtain these bones to process into bone meal.

    Under the Beef Bones Regulations 1997, bovine bones removed from any bone-in beef deboned in Great Britain must be disposed of as animal waste under Part II of Schedule I to the Animal By-Products Order 1992. Such bones will not therefore be available to individual consumers and may not be sold or used in the preparation of any food or ingredient for human consumption. They can however, continue to be used for other purposes such as commercial manufacture of bone meal fertiliser for the garden.

    Beef Bones For Dog Food

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether it is permissible to obtain bones from beef animals to feed to dogs.

    Bones removed from bone-in beef deboned in butchers shops in Great Britain may not be sold or given away to feed to dogs. Such bones must be disposed of as animal waste under Part II of Schedule I to the Animal By-Products Order 1992, in accordance with the Beef Bones Regulations 1997. Dog owners can purchase sterilised bones from knackers' yard.

    Fisheries Surveillance

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Which offshore vessels are at present used within the Fisheries Protection Squadron (Sea Fisheries Inspectorate) and Scottish Fisheries Protection Agency, what is the expected lifespan of such vessels and the contingency plans to replace them; and whether it is expected that the number of vessels will increase or decrease:

  • (a) up to the end of the year 2002;
  • (b) after the year 2002.
  • Responsibility for fisheries surveillance in British fisheries limits is shared between the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF) and the Scottish Fisheries Protection Agency (SFPA) on behalf of the Scottish Office Agriculture, Environment and Fisheries Department.In the waters adjacent to England and Wales, fisheries surveillance is undertaken on behalf of MAFF by the Royal Navy's Fishery Protection Squadron. The squadron comprises a core of eight purpose-built vessels and is supplemented by the short term deployment of Hunt Class Mine Countermeasure Vessels. The core vessels are:

    NameDate of CommissioningCurrent expected lifespan
    HMS "Guernsey:199730 years
    HMS "Shetland:197730 years
    HMS "Orkney"197730 years
    HMS "Lindisfarne"197830 years
    HMS "Alderney197930 years
    HMS "Anglesey"197930 years
    HMS "Leeds Castle"198130 years
    HMS "Dumbarton Castle"198230 years
    Each year the Navy undertakes to provide MAFF with an agreed number of patrol days using the above vessels and mine hunters.In the waters adjacent to Scotland, the SFPA operates four offshore vessels. These are:
    NameDate of CommissioningCurrent expected lifespan
    "Westra"1975until 2005
    "Sulisker"1980until 2010
    "Vigilant"1982until 2012
    "Norna"1987until 2017

    Additionally the SFPA operates two inshore vessels which were commissioned in 1983 with an expected lifespan of some 15 years.

    The Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland also operates an inshore patrol vessel, the "Ken Vickers", which was commissioned in 1992 with an expected lifespan of 10 years.

    Future requirements for fisheries surveillance in British fishery limits are reviewed from year to year. No decisions have yet been taken with regard to the replacement of the vessels named above or to the number of vessels that will be required for fisheries surveillance up to the year 2002 and beyond.

    Fish Spawning Stock

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the expected drop in spawning stock biomass for hake, plaice and megrim from the year 2000, given that the landing sizes have been set at 27 cm, 22 cm and 20 cm from this date.

    Changes in landing size will not, of themselves, result in any change in spawning stock biomass. It is the mesh size of nets, not the permitted landing size, which determines the size at which fish are killed.From 1 January 2000, fishermen will be able to land hake, plaice and megrim at these smaller sizes rather than be forced to discard and waste fish that have already been killed.

    Total consumption of fish and other marine resources—FAO estimates Metric tons in lire weight (thousands)
    19851986198719881989199019911992199319941995
    Belgium/Luxembourg181184185184181196194203187202215
    Greece168179186175196213219232246279254
    Finland153156158161161164163165163172169
    France1,3551,4401,5201,6111,5901.7371.6961,6541,5921,5821,537
    Germany8489128288719521,0469821,0269871,0601,052
    Ireland55666159565853606470nd
    Italy1,1311,0901,2451,1511,2041,2231,2981,2551,2261,2301,245
    Netherlands188155175203207162155203210215223
    Portugal547554569586581582606571585575573
    Spain1,2771,3281,3391,3761,3541,3511,3391,3731,4071,4571,446
    Sweden215225218225232233230229235248nd
    UK1,0201,0211,0301,0471,0751,1071,0821,1121,1001,1221,113
    Austria464953616971728078ndnd
    Denmark100101105109109101105110103ndnd
    nd: no data available.

    Source:

    Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.

    Marine Resource Consumption In The Ec

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What proportion of the annual consumption of marine resources in the European Community came from:

  • (a) waters within the 200 mile limit of member states;
  • (b) waters of third world countries with which special agreements have been made;
  • (c) countries other than those mentioned in (a) and (b)
  • in each year since 1983.

    The available information on consumption of marine resources in the European Community does not permit the requested identification of the geographical origin of the products contributing to that consumption.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What has been the total annual consumption of fish and other marine resources in each year since 1985 for the 15 member states of the European Community.

    The available information which has been produced by the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) of the United Nations is set out in the table below.These estimates of consumption are calculated by FAO as production adjusted for imports net of exports and non-food uses. Data are given for all years since 1985, though not all the current 15 member states have been part of the European Community for the whole of this period.