asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will consider a change in the law so as to allow the service of a notice of intention to deport on a person serving a sentence of imprisonment several weeks prior to the end of his sentence and to provide that no challenge could then be made to the Secretary of State on the grounds that he could not have considered all the circumstances, so that minimum delays occur between the end of the sentence and the hearing of any appeal against deportation, as was originally proposed in 1979. [HL3516]

The Immigration Rules stipulate that before a decision to deport is reached, full account will be taken of all relevant factors. We have no plans to change this requirement. There is a right of appeal, exercisable before removal, against a decision to deport.It is our normal practice to take a decision on whether or not to initiate deportation action against someone serving a custodial sentence as soon as practicable, with a view to completing all the administrative action in connection with the decision, including any appeal hearing, prior to the completion of the sentence. Where this can be achieved, removal can be effected at once. Unfortunately, this is not always possible. Sometimes the sentence imposed is too short to allow the administrative action to be completed (particularly where time spent on remand is taken into account or the sentence is reduced on appeal); sometimes the deportee will submit an application for asylum or notify us of a change in his circumstances at a late stage; and occasionally there may be difficulties in obtaining a travel document for the person concerned.The Government do not consider that changing the law to provide that no challenge be made to the Secretary of State's decision to deport would significantly reduce these delays.

asked Her Majesty's Government:On what date they received the draft report of the Chief Inspector of Prisons on Haslar and when they now expect to publish it. [HL3480]

The Chief Inspector of Prisons submitted the draft report of his inspection of Haslar to my right honourable friend the Home Secretary on 11 September. Under the protocol procedures for the handling of the Chief Inspector's inspection reports, Ministers approve publication of a report once the Director General of the Prison Service has confirmed its factual accuracy. The Director General wrote to the Chief Inspector on 6 October, seeking the correction of a number of factual inaccuracies within the draft report. Once this correspondence has been concluded, I will make an early decision about publication.

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the review of the Prison Service's Quantum Project has been completed and what action has been taken thereon: whether they will publish the reports on the information system consultancy, for which £5 million had already been paid when the project was suspended: and what controls were used in accordance with CCTA and government accounting guidelines to ensure that value for money was obtained. [HL3518]

The review of the Quantum project announced by the Director General of the Prison Service on 10 August should take up to six months to complete. Any action will depend upon the outcome of the review. Consultants were employed to facilitate the management of the project, but the papers relating to them contain commercially and legally sensitive material and cannot therefore be made available publicly. The Director General has established an internal inquiry to consider specifically lessons to be learned from the management of the project before 10 August.

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will publish a list of the Boards of Visitors at Her Majesty's prisons which do not publish their annual reports. [HL3517]

Of the 130 Boards of Visitors at prison establishments due to submit an annual report to the Home Secretary in 1997, 66 did not publish their report. The establishments in question were as follows:

• Acklington
• Albany
• Ashwell
• Aylesbury
• Bedford
• Birmingham
• Brinsford
• Brockhill
• Buckley Hall
• Bullingdon
• Camp Hill
• Canterbury
• Castington
• Coldingley
• Cookham Wood
• Deerbolt
• Doncaster
• Dover
• Durham
• Eastwood Park
• Elmley
• Erlestoke
• Everthorpe
• Featherstone
• Frankland
• Garth
• Gartree
• Glen Parva
• Gloucester
• Hatfield
• Hindley
• Holloway
• Kirklevington
• Lancaster Castle
• Latchmere House
• Leeds
• Leicester
• Leyhill
• Lindholme
• Liverpool
• Long Lartin
• Low Newton
• Maidstone
• Manchester
• Moorland
• North Sea Camp
• Onley
• Parkhurst
• Portland
• Preston
• Ranby
• Rochester
• Shrewsbury
• Stafford
• Standford Hill
• Stocken
• Styal
• Sudbury
• Swinfen Hall
• Thorn Cross
• Wakefield
• Wealstun
• Werrington
• Wetherby
• Woodhill
• Wymott

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether progress has been made on the recommendations of the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Report

The then Government's response to the 1986 Home Affairs Committee report Bangladeshis in Britain was published in a White Paper in 1987. In 1993, Sir Peter Lloyd provided an update on the progress made with regard to the Bangladeshi community (Official Report, 30 April 1993, col. 568).The Government do not intend to set up an inquiry into the progress of the Bangladeshi community. The Government are aware of the particular problems of the Bangladeshi community and will address these issues as part of their wider policy of tackling racism and discrimination in society.

asked Her Majesty's Government:How many current members of the Judicial Committee, eligible to sit in proceedings raising devolution issues arising under the Scotland Bill, the Northern Ireland Bill and the Government of Wales Act 1998, have held judicial office in Scotland, Northern Ireland, and England and Wales, respectively. [HL3439]

The information requested is as follows:1.

asked Her Majesty's Government:What is their position on the investigation initiated by the President of the World Bank into allegations of fraud and other illegal activities by senior bank staff. [HL3541]

While there is no reason to believe that there is a widespread problem of corruption in the World Bank, we welcome the steps taken by the bank to root out corruption and fraud in the organisation. These include recent measures to introduce an anti-corruption hot line and an Oversight Committee responsible for supervising all investigations. We are satisfied that the World Bank is doing its best to address allegations of corruption and is taking the same attitude to corruption internally as it does externally.

asked Her Majesty's Government:What is their view of the draft proposals by the working group of executive directors of the World Bank in relation to the reform of their inspection panel. [HL3540]

We support the efforts of the working group, which was set up in March 1998, to consult widely with bank staff, management, the inspection panel, claimants, executive directors and others to build a consensus on an operational framework for the panel. The working group was originally mandated to report to the board within three months. It has had a number of meetings, and its consultations continue. To date no draft proposals have been formally tabled for consideration by the board.

asked Her Majesty's Government:What is their policy with regard to nuclear retaliation in the case of aggressor states contemplating the use of chemical and biological weapons. [HL3331]

The use of chemical or biological weapons by any state would be a grave breach of international law. A state which chose to use chemical or biological weapons against the United Kingdom should expect us to exercise our right of self defence and to make a proportionate response.

asked Her Majesty's Government:What is their latest position on Negative Security Assurances in the context of the possible use of chemical and biological weapons by aggressor states; and whether they have considered the adoption of a "no first use of any weapon of mass destruction" policy at least with regard to non-nuclear weapon states. [HL3350]

We have long given assurances to non-nuclear weapon states who are party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and who meet their obligations under that treaty that we would not use nuclear weapons against them unless they first attacked us in association with a nuclear weapon state. We considered No First Use in the Strategic Defence Review but saw no reason to change our and NATO's current nuclear policy. As for our policy on responding to attacks using chemical or biological weapons, I refer the noble Lord to my answer to him earlier today.

asked Her Majesty's Government:What action they are taking to reallocate responsibility for underwater archaeology in English and Welsh waters. [HL3415]

We have recently completed a consultation exercise on all the proposals resulting from our Departmental Spending Review, including that of transferring responsibility for underwater archaeology to the new heritage lead body. We are considering responses to the consultation, and hope to make an announcement on the outcome by the end of the year. We are, in the meantime, beginning discussions with English Heritage on how the proposed transfer of responsibility might be implemented. Legislation will be needed to give English Heritage the wider powers to carry out certain functions in waters off England.It is not envisaged that there would be changes to the current work carried out by CADW off Welsh waters.

asked Her Majesty's Government:What will be the remit of the Advisory Committee on Pesticides when assessing applications for the use of herbicide on crops genetically engineered to be resistant to the herbicide. [HL3397]

The remit of the Advisory Committee on Pesticides is to give advice to Ministers, either when requested to do so or otherwise, on any matters relating to the control of pests in furthering the general purposes of Part III of the Food and Environment Protection Act 1985.No herbicide (or any pesticide) may be used unless Ministers, advised by the committee, have given approval to that use. The use of a herbicide on a crop genetically engineered to be resistant to that herbicide would be a new use requiring a new ministerial approval. When considering whether to recommend that such an application to use a herbicide should be approved by Ministers, the committee will apply its usual standards of human and environmental safety.

asked Her Majesty's Government:What progress has been made at the British Cattle Movement Service since the launch of the computerised Cattle Tracing System for Great Britain on 28 September 1998. [HL3493]

The British Cattle Movement Service (BCMS) launched the new Cattle Tracing System for Great Britain on 28 September 1998. As of 14 October, the BCMS has issued 120,666 passports and processed 26,520 notifications of cattle movements. The BCMS has also dealt with over 50,000 calls to the local call rate Helpline since it opened on 1 July 1998.Passport production peaked on 10 October when 23,747 passports were issued. The busiest day for the Helpline was 29 September, when 1,914 calls were received.

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the Intervention Board intends to publish a revised corporate plan, as set out in its Policy and Resources Framework Document. [HL3507]

The Intervention Board published a new corporate plan in September 1998, to cover the years 1998–1999 to 2002–03. Copies are held in the Library of the House.

asked Her Majesty's Government:What was the outcome of the Agriculture Council held in Brussels on 28 September. [HL3506]

My right honourable friend the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food represented the United Kingdom at a meeting of the European Union Agriculture Council in Brussels on 28 September.The Council held a first debate on a Commission proposal to reform the EU wine regime. My right honourable friend the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food welcomed many elements in the proposal, in particular measures to redirect EU production away from its traditional reliance on market intervention and towards improved quality and competitiveness. However he questioned the need to increase the budgetary cost of the wine regime in order to achieve those ends.The Council also debated the impact of the crisis in Russia on EU agricultural markets, and invited the Commission to keep the position under constant scrutiny in view of the importance of the Russian market for EU agricultural exports. More generally, the Commission circulated updated market forecasts for the principal EU agricultural commodities in the period up to 2005, forecasts which will form part of the Council's consideration of proposals to reform the Common Agricultural Policy within the framework of Agenda 2000.In the context of CAP reform my right honourable friend the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food introduced in the Council a paper prepared jointly with Italian, Swedish and Danish colleagues which proposes a mechanism and a timetable for the removal of milk quotas by 2006. He collectively called for the paper to be examined in detail as part of the ongoing Agenda 2000 negotiations.Discussion of the proposal to improve the welfare of laying hens revealed continuing differences amongst member states over the desirability of the measure, and the economic effect of the proposal if implemented. In common with several other member states, my right honourable friend the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food stressed the UK view that the EU should commit itself to an eventual phasing out of the battery cage system.The Council also took stock of the difficult economic conditions prevailing on the pigmeat market and invited the Commission to keep the situation under review. There was also an exchange of views on the incidence of BSE in Portugal in which the Commission reported that its own inspection team was currently examining the measures taken by the Portuguese administration to protect human health and combat the disease in animals.

asked Her Majesty's Government:What steps they have taken to clarify the legality of the state aids to pig producers recently announced by the French and German governments. [HL3418]

Assessing the legality of state aids is the responsibility of the EU Commission. I understand that the Commission is currently considering French and German proposals for schemes targeted at pig producers in those countries. According to Commission regulations, no measures may be put in place unless and until approval is granted.

asked Her Majesty's Government:What is their latest estimate of the total cost to public funds so far of dealing with BSE; and whether they will break down this information by financial year. [HL3431]

The gross cost to public funds since 1 April 1996 of dealing with BSE is approximately £3.2 billion. For the financial years 1996–97 and 1997–98 costs were £1.5 billion and £1.0 billion respectively. We have, however, received EU contributions of approximately 45 per cent. towards these costs. Costs in 1998–99 are forecast to be about £0.7 billion.

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will publish in the

The following table shows the number of cases of BSE confirmed in Great Britain during each week of 1998 up to 16 October, together with the moving annual total of cases reported for this period.