Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 613: debated on Thursday 25 May 2000

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

Thursday, 25th May 2000

The Queen Mother's 100Th Birthday

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether there will be a national holiday to celebrate the 100th birthday of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother, and if not, why not. [HL2502]

The Minister for Science, Department of Trade and Industry
(Lord Sainsbury of Turville)

There will not be a national holiday to celebrate Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother's 100th birthday. It was decided that it would not be appropriate to proclaim a further bank holiday following so soon after the Millennium bank holiday and with proposals being considered for a bank holiday to mark the Queen's Golden Jubilee in 2002.

Civil Justice Review, Northern Ireland: Publication

asked Her Majesty's Government:When they intend to publish the review of civil justice in Northern Ireland. [HL2450]

The final report of the Civil Justice Reform Group will be published on 16th June with a consultation period until the end of September. Copies will be placed in the Libraries of both Houses.

Joint Committee On Human Rights

asked Her Majesty's Government:When it is intended to set up a parliamentary Select Committee on Human Rights in accordance with paragraphs 3.7–3.8 of the White Paper

Rights Brought Home (Cm 3782, 1997). [HL2461]

In its Second Report (8 May 2000, HL Paper 62) the Liaison Committee noted the Government's proposal to establish, before the Human Rights Act 1998 comes into force in October this year, a Joint Committee on Human Rights. Preliminary consultations on setting up a Joint Committee on Human Rights are now taking place within the usual channels. The House will, of course, have the opportunity to debate the proposed Standing Orders in due course, and I will ensure that adequate notice of any such debate is given on the Order Paper. The Government will propose very broad terms of reference for the Committee.

Committee On Standards In Public Life

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by the Leader of the House on 11 May (

WA 236), what mechanisms exist within the Committee on Standards in Public Life for dealing with any potential or perceived conflicts of interest. [HL2510]

The mechanisms for dealing with potential and perceived conflicts of interest for members of the Committee on Standards in Public Life are set out in the Committee's code of practice. Copies of the code can be obtained from the Committee or downloaded from its website at www.public-standards.gov.uk. Copies have also been deposited in the Library of the House.

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by the Leader of the House on 11 May (

WA 237), whether they are considering placing the Committee on Standards in Public Life on a statutory basis in the future. [HL2511]

I refer the noble Earl to the Answer I gave to the noble Lord, Lord Dean of Harptree, on 11 May 2000, col. WA 237.

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by the Leader of the House on 11 May (

WA 237), what options for the future work of the Committee on Standards in Public Life other than a review of standards of conduct in the House of Lords were discussed between the Prime Minister and the Lord Neill of Bladen on 10 January. [HL2512]

Information on internal deliberation, whose disclosure would harm the frankness and candour of discussion, is exempt from disclosure under the Code of Practice on Access to Government Information.

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they intend to ensure that the House of Lords can consider any report emanating from the Committee on Standards in Public Life's review of standards of conduct in the House in advance of it being disseminated more widely. [HL2513]

It will be for the Committee to decide the arrangements for publishing their report.

Written Questions: Electronic Answers

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether it is yet possible for a Peer to request that copies of all replies to his Written Questions should be sent to him by e-mail; and, if so, how. [HL2415]

The Central IT Unit of the Cabinet Office has investigated the feasibility of answering written parliamentary questions electronically and the Central Computer and Telecommunications Agency (CCTA) has been developing a detailed operating system. CCTA is now working towards the implementation of the system and will be providing a report to the Library and Computers Sub-Committee of the House in June.

Free Television Licences Concession

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will pay those pensioners who do not have a television the equivalent of the cost of a television licence, which they have proposed should be free to pensioners. [HL2537]

The Government is aiming to introduce, from 1 November, free television licences for all people aged 75 or over. We decided to introduce free licences for older pensioners because, as a group, they are more likely to be reliant on television as their window on the world. People aged 75 or over, who do not have a television set, will not receive a cash payment since the purpose of the concession is to assist access to television and not to provide a cash benefit.

Millennium Dome: Funding

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the Millennium Commission has any further plans to provide financial support to the Millennium Experience at Greenwich. [HL2636]

On 22 May the Millennium Commission considered an application for additional grant totalling £38.6 million from the New Millennium Experience Company (NMEC). Whilst the Commission had serious reservations about providing further grant, they concluded that it would be foolish to withdraw support when the best of the year for visitor attractions is yet to come. They also felt that the value of the Dome as the centrepiece of the nation's millennium celebrations should be recognised and continued. The potential costs to the public sector arising from immediate closure, along with the economic impact on employment and tourism, were other factors taken into account.In light of this, the Commission announced that a further grant of £29 million, subject to stringent conditions, would be made available to NMEC. The Commission's decision was taken after an independent review of the NMEC's financial systems and business plans. The conditions are that there should be: strengthening and restructuring of NMEC's management and governance; a revised business plan showing substantial additional cost savings and enhanced marketing plans; and an enhanced financial team at NMEC, to be joined by a dedicated member of the Millennium Commission's own financial staff.All the Millennium Commissioners expressed confidence in NMEC's chief executive, P-Y Gerbeau and are appreciative of the changes he has made to the operation and running of the Millennium Experience.Despite lower than predicted visitor numbers, the Dome is the most popular and highly rated paid visitor attraction in the UK, with a wide range of educational benefits. NMEC is also running a national programme of events and activities across the UK. In addition, the largest derelict site in southern England has been regenerated and the foundations have been laid for a lasting legacy providing jobs and homes for thousands of people.In line with the commitment made by the previous administration that any additional Lottery funds required to support the Dome should not be at the expense of the Millennium Commission's wider programme of work, the Government confirmed that Lottery money would, if necessary, be made available to the Commission to ensure that its wider programme does not suffer.

Tobacco Smuggling

asked Her Majesty's Government:What is their estimate of the loss incurred (a) by British retailers and (b) by the Treasury as a result of (i) the smuggling of tobacco and (ii) the importation of duty paid tobacco between 1996 and 1999. [HL2548]

I refer my noble friend to the Tackling Tobacco Smuggling paper published on 22 March 2000 by HM Customs and Excise and HM Treasury.

A14 Road Bridges, Huntingdon

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether all the bridges supporting the Al4 near Huntingdon are rated for 44 tonnes; and, if not, what the limitations are; and [HL2562]Whether an operator running at 44 tonnes under the Construction and Use Regulations is required to notify any highway or bridge authority of his intention to use the A14 near Huntingdon. [HL2563]

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
(Lord Whitty)

This is an operational matter for the Highways Agency and I have asked the chief executive of the Highways Agency, Mr Peter Nutt, to write to the noble Earl.

Letter from Ginny Clarke, Board Member, to Earl Attlee, dated 25 May 2000:

"The Minister for Transport has asked me to reply to your recent question about bridges supporting the Al4 near Huntingdon, and about vehicles running at 44 tonnes under the Construction and Use Regulations. You also wish to know whether operators of such vehicles are required to notify any highway or bridge authority of their intention to use the Al4 near Huntingdon.

"All bridges on the A 1 4 near Huntingdon are currently rated for 44 tonnes provided the vehicle is within the Construction and Use Regulations. Under these regulations, there are no notification requirements for vehicles running at 44 tonnes on the Al4 near Huntingdon."

Public Footpaths And Bridleways

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will list, by county, for England and Wales the number of miles of (a) public footpaths and (b) bridleways. [HL2504]

This information is not collected by my department. The County Surveyors' Society has supplied the information in Table 1 for England, and the Countryside Council for Wales has provided the information in Table 2 for Wales.

Table 1
FootpathsBridleways
Council(km)(km)
Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council555150
Birmingham City Council5005
Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council3272
Bradford Metropolitan District Council834105
Bury Metropolitan Borough Council28019
Calderdale MBC1,200218
City of Sunderland13126
Newcastle City Council7117
Coventry City Council1020
Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council35894
Dudley MBC28010
Gateshead MB Council17332
Kirklees MC94483
Knowsley Metropolitan Brough Council707
Leeds City Council942153
Liverpool City Council4010
Manchester City Council720
North Tyneside Council9724
Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council37531
Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council42177
Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council40050
Salford City Council1193
Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council723
Sheffield City Council63276
Solihull MBC20011
South Tyneside MB Council7410
St Helens MBC2203
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council20535
Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council815110
Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council951
Wakefield MDC38979
Walsall MB872
Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council43035

Table 1

Footpaths

Bridleways

Council

(km)

(km)

Wolverhampton MBC576
Bedfordshire County Council1,543565
Cambridgeshire County Council2,202516
Lincolnshire County Council3,040782
Luton Borough Council86
Norfolk County Council2,628499
North Lincolnshire Council41083
North East Lincolnshire Council15075
Peterborough City Council16589
Suffolk County Council4,482558
Derby City Council523
Derbyshire County Council4,800456
Herefordshire Council2,942394
Leicester City Council7618
Leicestershire County Council2,429504
Northamptonshire County Council2,148810
Nottingham City Council28
Nottinghamshire County Council2,368815
Rutland County Council191124
Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council2545
Shropshire County Council4,250770
Staffordshire County Council3,620355
Stoke City Counciln/kn/k
Telford and Wrekin Council30065
Warwickshire County Council2,318482
Worcestershire County Council4,210421
Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council4662
Blackpool Borough Council193
Cheshire County Council2.807132
City of York Council16535
Cumbria County5,4511,883
Darlington Borough Council22465
Durham County Council2,795501
East Riding of Yorkshire Council950350
Halton Borough Council771
Hartlepool Borough Council835
Kingston-upon-Hull City Council390
Lancashire County Council5,568383
Middlesbrough Borough Council352
North Yorkshire County Council8,7492,737
Northumberland County Council3,1331,295
Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council22153
Stockton Borough Council15633
Warrington Borough Counciln/kn/k
Wirral Borough Council9517
Bracknell Forest Borough Council455
Brighton and Hove Council2577
Buckinghamshire County Council2,720587
East Sussex County Council2,451713
Essex County Council6,505800
Hampshire County Council3,342681
Hertfordshire County Council2,228577
Isle of Wight Council514266
Kent County Council5,744663
Milton Keynes Council345191
Oxfordshire County Council2,553970
Portsmouth City Counciln/kn/k
Reading Borough Council171
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead21930
Slough Borough Council193
Southampton City Council163
Southend-on-Sea Borough Council902
Surrey County Council2,1121,014
The Medway Towns Council21815
Thurrock Council151
West Sussex County Council2,8161,006
West Berkshire Council676200
Wokingham District Council14321
Bath & North East Somerset Council73836
Bournemouth Borough Council321
Bristol City Council1255
Cornwall County Council3,533527
Devon County Council4,2001,250
Dorset County Council2,7901,730

Table 1

Footpaths

Bridleways

Council

(km)

(km)

Gloucestershire County Council4,503703
North Somerset Council65665
Borough of Poole356
Plymouth City Council90
Somerset City Council4,760910
South Gloucestershire Council1,118112
Swindon Borough Council12959
Torbay Borough Council1803
Wiltshire County Council3,5601,573
Dartmoor National Park331316
Exmoor National Park438464
Broads National Park27832
Lake District National Park2,896673
Northumberland National Park529368
North York Moors National Park1,506752
Peak District National Park2,124258
Yorkshire Dales National Park1,483634
London Borough of Barking & Dagenham170
London Borough of Barnet231
Bexley Council433
London Borough of Brent161
London Borough of Bromley16914
London Borough of Croydon10717
London Borough of Ealing651
London Borough of Enfield375
London Borough of Haringey160
London Borough of Harrow214
London Borough of Havering977
London Borough of Hillingdon814
London Borough of Hounslow202
Royal Borough of Kingston247
London Borough of Merton4310
London Borough of Newham193
London Borough of Redbridge161
London Borough of Richmond-upon-Thames1002
London Borough of Sutton174
London Borough of Waltham Forest120
Corporation of London80
Camden20
Greenwich161
Hackneyn/kn/k
Islington00
Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea60
Lambeth140
Lewisham60
Southwark20
Tower Hamletsn/kn/k
Wandsworth190
Westminster Cityn/kn/k

Table 2

Footpaths

Bridleways

Council

(km)

(km)

Blaenau Gwent193,465,173
Ynys Mon1,056.53
Gwynedd3,317.7300.88
Wrexham78360
Newport2667
Swansea506113
Torfaen2927
Conwyn/kn/k
Neath and Port Talbot529123
Brecon Beacons NP1,500220
Carmarthenshire3,100120
Bridgend494.7879.66
Pembrokeshire1,287.2209.17
Powys6,3912,770
Snowdonia NP2,316186
Ceredigion NP1,634468
Cardiff165.2255.536
Caerphilly818.4135
Pembrokeshire Coast NP823121

Table 2

Footpaths

Bridleways

Council

(km)

(km)

Flintshire935106
Denbighshire1,110185
Vale of Glamorgan498.227.17
Rhondda Cynon Taff652.53488.172
Merthyr Tydfil50.14129.176
Monmouthshire1,434.666.7

Guide Dogs Carried In Taxis: Regulations

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the provisions in the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, applying to the carriage of guide dogs for blind people in taxis, have yet been put into effect: and to what extent minicabs are included under those provisions. [HL2552]

The package of regulations relating to those provisions is being finalised now. We are taking the opportunity to extend these duties, as provided for by the legislation, by specifying other assistance dogs used by disabled people in addition to guide and hearing dogs which are included on the face of the Disability Discrimination Act. This addition has delayed final production of the package, but we aim to consult on it within a matter of weeks with the aim of bringing in the duty at the end of this year. Private hire vehicles-or minicabs as they are known—are not covered by the Act. We therefore have no powers to extend these duties to the drivers of those vehicles.

Right Of Access To Countryside: Assessment Of Litter Problem

asked Her Majesty's Government:What consideration has been given to the dumping of litter or waste upon private land in connection with the proposed extension of access; what action (a) the owner or occupier of open land and (b) police forces will be able to take to prevent or respond to the problem. [HL2546]

The right of access to open countryside provided for in the Countryside and Rights of Way Bill is limited to those who enter onto land on foot for the purposes of open-air recreation. The Bill provides that those who exercise the right of access must abide by sensible restrictions, including a requirement not to deposit any rubbish or leave any litter. Leaving litter on access land will also be an offence. The Bill does not give people any right to enter onto land for the purpose of dumping litter or waste, nor does it oblige landowners to facilitate access for that purpose. We do not expect that the Bill will generally lead to a significant increase in littering on open country. Access authorities will be able to provide assistance with wardening where problems may occur.

Prison Service Projects

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will list the initiatives on which the Prison Service spent money without contractual backing in 1999–2000, giving in each case the name of the initiative and the money spent. [HL2468]

The Prison Service does not have any information available centrally about initiatives operating without contractual backing.A new Prison Service instruction is to be issued shortly which documents overall strategies, procurement best practice, mandatory instructions and carries with it a revised system of contractual delegations. A copy will be sent to the noble Lord and copies placed in the Library when it is published.I understand that the noble Lord is primarily interested in expenditure on the KAIROS/APAC projects which were operating in three prisons; the Verne, Swaleside and Highpoint under partnership agreements until June 1999.Money spent on these projects during the financial year 1999–2000 amounted to a total of £41,075. The amounts spent by each establishment in that financial year and, in total, are given in the table.

Payments made by the Prison Service to KAIROS/APAC Trust
Payments MadeTotal Payments
Establishment1999–2000Made
Brixton£17,587£37,126
Highpoint£4,738£38,427
Swaleside£8,250£16,344
The Verne£10,500£18,500
Totals£41,075£110,397