Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 627: debated on Friday 14 September 2001

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

Friday, 14th September 2001.

Police Service: Retirement

asked Her Majesty's GovernmentWhat studies the Home Office is carrying out into patterns of retirement from police force to police force and as to the reasons why police officers are leaving (a) early or (b) after 30 years' service. [HL427]

A number of Home Office studies in the 1990s looked at the reasons why people leave the police service early other than on medical grounds. These studies identified particular difficulties in retaining officers who are female, graduates or from minority ethnic groups. The need for further research on all aspects of retention will be considered in the coming months.The importance of ensuring that the medical retirement rates for all forces are more consistent has been recognised for some time and we are currently considering how best to tackle the divergence in performance between forces.As most police officers are entitled to retire with an immediate—and maximum—pension after completion of 30 years' service it is to be expected that the majority of officers would choose to retire at this stage. We are, however, considering how suitable officers might be encouraged to delay their retirement as part of our plans to boost police numbers to record levels. This clearly requires an understanding of the motivations of officers who retire with 30 years' service.

Yarl's Wood Detention Centre

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether, when Yarl's Wood detention centre is fully commissioned, they will reduce the number of places used in processing for Immigration Act detainees by the number of places available at this detention centre. [HL533]

When Yarl's Wood detention centre opens later this year, the total number of places available for immigration detainees in the detention estate will increase by 900. We remain committed to pursuing a strategy of detaining people in dedicated detention facilities of this kind and reducing reliance on Prison Service accommodation.

Dogs: Deployment In Prisons

asked Her Majesty's Government:What conclusions the Advisory Committee on the Use of Dogs in Prison has reached on the effectiveness of drug dogs, both active and passive, and whether they will place copies of the committee's reports in the Library of the House.[HL610]

The Advisory Committee on the Use of Dogs in Prison reported in September 1998 and a copy of the report has been placed in the Library. Prison Service Order 1050 provides standards for the deployment of dogs in prisons, a copy of which is already in the Library.In January 2001 the Drug Strategy Unit commissioned a further independent review of the effectiveness of passive drug dogs, undertaken jointly by the Police Scientific Development Branch and the (then) Defence, Evaluation and Research Agency. The final report is not yet available. The emerging findings confirm that passive drug dogs remain the most effective means of screening non-intrusively for a wide range of drugs.

Prisoners: Hours Confined In Cell

To ask Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Rooker on 16 July (

WA 98), why men held in remand centres in May spent, on average, 2.6 hours longer in their cell per weekday than those held in Category B prisons and 3.9 hours longer than those held in Category C; and [HL614]

Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Rooker on 16 July ( WA 98), why men held in closed Young Offender Institutions in May spent, on average, 2.1 hours longer in their cell per weekday than those held in Category B prisons and 3.4 hours longer than those held in Category C. [HL615]

The only establishment that is designated as a remand centre is Her Majesty's Young Offender Institution/Remand Centre Northallerton. This is because the majority of the prison's population are remand prisoners, compared with other establishments whose population consists of only a minority of remand prisoners. Remand prisoners spend, on average, less time out of cell because they have not been found guilty of any offence and therefore cannot be required to undertake any activity. Their time in prison is frequently interrupted by court appearances so they cannot engage on courses. Therefore, most of their time is spent on recreational activities or in their cells. Category B and C prisons hold sentenced prisoners who would be required to work, take part in education and undertake offending behaviour programmes. They will therefore spend, on average, more time out of cell than remand prisoners.The Prison Service is making efforts to increase the amount of purposeful activity available for remand prisoners to participate in and so increase their time out of cell.As of 13 August this year, Her Majesty's Young Offender Institution/Remand Centre Northallerton will be introducing a new activity programme that will greatly increase the time remand prisoners spend out of cell to levels more comparable to Category C and B prisons.Most young offender institutions hold a mixture of sentenced and remand prisoners. Therefore, the average figure for time spent out of cell will again be lower than most Category B and C prisons which hold only sentenced prisoners.The conditions and regimes for juvenile offenders have, however, been transformed by the Prison Service in partnership with the Youth Justice Board. One effect of these improvements has been to highlight that young adult offenders have not fared so well. We are committed to building upon reforms of the youth justice system to improve the standards of custodial accommodation and offending programmes for this latter age group. We are currently considering how best to give effect to this commitment.

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Rooker on 16 July (

WA 98), whether the figures quoted for the 'average weekday time out of cell May 2001' are representative of the average times for which different categories of prisoner are allowed out of their cell. [HL616]

The Prison Service does not collect centrally the time out of cell for individual prisoners. The figures quoted for the 'average weekday time out of cell May 2001' are averages based on the time out of cell for all prisoners within a given establishment, regardless of the category of the prisoner.When figures are aggregated by function of establishment, prisons are categorised by their main function only. This means that in establishments with multiple functions the time out of cell for different types of prisoners are contained within the average. For example, the female wing at Her Majesty's Prison Winchester is included within the average for that establishment and appears in the table as part of the male local estate. For that reason the averages quoted for categories of prison are not necessarily representative of the average times for which different categories of prisoner are allowed out of their cell.

Children In Secure Facilities: Parental Contact

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will send a photograph and background information on each child admitted to prison to the Missing Persons Helpline. [HL641]

We do not propose to do so. Other steps are taken to provide parental contact with children and young people in secure facilities. The national standards produced by the Youth Justice Board for England and Wales require youth offending teams supervising officers to maintain contact with the person's parents or primary carer.

Prisoners: Training

asked Her Majesty's Government:What training is given prior to release to prisoners, particularly long-term inmates; and which outside agencies or industrialists are helping prisons provide courses to prepare prisoners for possible further employment. [HL642]

The Government are committed to increasing educational attainment by prisoners and linking this to employment and learning opportunities on release. The Prison Service provides a range of training to equip prisoners with the relevant skills and qualifications. This includes provision of basic skills, such as literacy and numeracy, and vocational training for particular trades and other occupations. In 2000–01, more than 50,000 nationally recognised qualifications were achieved by prisoners, including around 12,500 literacy and numeracy qualifications at level two, often helping to make them employable for the first time.The delivery of this training involves Prison Service instructional officers, further education colleges, learning and skills councils, businesses, industry bodies and others. Since April 2001 this work has been taken forward within a new partnership between the Prison Service and the Department for Education and Skills to improve the education and training of prisoners. It is also connected to the Prison Service's Custody to Work programme, which aims to double the number of prisoners getting jobs on release by April 2004. Better equipped prisoners for available jobs is an important element of that programme, together with a more effective engagement with the business and voluntary sectors and with other agencies, including the Employment Service and the National Probation Service.

Prison Service: Salaries

asked Her Majesty's Government:How prison staff salaries reflect qualifications and expertise. [HL643]

Most Prison Service staff join at the pay minima of the respective grade, of which there are over 100. The pay rates of civilian staff recognise various forms of specialism e.g. accountancy, auditing, psychology, farm management and industrial craft trades. Specialist prison officers e.g. those working in healthcare, catering, physical education, libraries, works services trades, instructing and as dog handlers currently receive an annual specialist allowance. We are also in the process of introducing market supplements to recognise specialisms such as personnel, procurement, project management, engineering and health and safety.

Prison Governors And Officers: Training

asked Her Majesty's Government:What professional training is given to governors and prison officers. [HL644]

There is an extensive range of training available to all staff in the Prison Service, from the initial training for new prison officers, through to specific operational training courses and opportunities for staff development.The initial training for new prison officers is an 11-week course that is partly residential and partly establishment based. This gives a thorough introduction to the Prison Service and equips officers to maintain security and contribute to prisoner resettlement.Serving officers are offered further training to meet the needs of security and the prison regime.Security training covers, for example, control and restraint techniques, security management, control room, searching, hostage incidents and use of X-ray equipment.Training in prisoner management and care includes, for example, courses for staff who work with young offenders or women prisoners, for those involved in delivering offending behaviour programmes, and for physical education officers.Officers are able to pursue a national vocational qualification in custodial care, based on newly-developed national occupational standards which were launched in January this year.A new approach to leadership and management development is now being created. It will include a leadership programme and direct support and advice to establishments. This review will take account of the recommendations of Lord Laming of Tewin.Details of all current training courses can be found in the latest edition of the Prison Service's

Directory of Training, copies of which can be found in the Library.

Slopping Out In Prisons

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Rooker on 11 July (

WA 76), what are the operational reasons for continuing not to provide sanitation in a proportion of cells in segregation units and health care centres. [HL695]

Cells without integral sanitation in segregation units and health care centres are used to hold prisoners while their behaviour is disturbed, violent or destructive and where they are assessed as presenting a serious risk of harm to themselves or others.

Policing Of Cannabis

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord Rooker of 12 July (

WA 85), whether they will introduce specific performance indicators relating to the policing of cannabis; and, if not, why not. [HL545]

We have no plans for introducing specific performance indicators relating to the policing of cannabis.The Home Secretary sets the strategic direction for the police service through a small number of ministerial priorities, each measured by a set of performance indicators including the best value suite of performance indicators (BVPIs).The priority on drugs, as reflected in the Government's 10-year drugs strategy, is to tackle the misuse of Class A drugs, such as heroin and cocaine, as these are the drugs that cause the greatest harm. A BVPI (No. 129) exists in respect of supply offences involving Class A drugs.We do not propose to divert police attention and resources away from tackling Class A drug offences by introducing a specific performance indicator in respect of Class B drugs, such as cannabis.

Sexual Offences Review: Report

asked Her Majesty's Government:When they intend to respond to

Setting the Boundaries, the report of the sexual offences review, published on 4 April 2000; and [HL548]

Whether they intend to implement the recommendations of Setting the Boundaries, the report of the sexual offences review, published on 4 April 2001. [HL549]

The recommendations to the Government of the sex offences review, contained in Setting the Boundaries: reforming the law on sex offences were published in July last year.We are currently considering over 700 responses to that consultation paper and will announce our decisions about implementation once we have completed our consideration.

Firearms Database

asked Her Majesty's Government:What progress is being made with the establishment of a central register, as required under Section 39 of the Firearms (Amendment) Act 1977, which came into force on 1 October 1997, of persons who have applied for a shot gun or firearm certificate or to whom a firearm or shot gun certificate has been granted; and whether they still expect this database to be operational in February 2002, as indicated in the Written Answer by the Lord Bassam of Brighton on 23 April. [HL450]

I understand that work has begun on the project, which will create a central register on the police national computer of firearms certificate Holders, drawn from the register already held by local police force systems.This development work will continue, but I regret to say that it will not be possible for the register to be implemented on the live operational PNC system until an upgrade of PNC software has been completed. This upgrade is essential for the continued daily operation of PNC, which might otherwise be prejudiced, and should be completed in March 2002 and advised that the firearms certificate holders register will go live as soon as possible after that; timing is dependent on rework necessary to ensure existing applications run on the upgraded software. I am asking the PITO board for a full report on this unwelcome slippage and will write to the noble Lord when this has been received.

Victoria Street: Rough Sleeping

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether it is the policy of the Metropolitan Police to prevent rough sleeping on the north side of Victoria Street around New Scotland Yard, but to permit it on the south side of Victoria Street and around the precinct of Westminster Cathedral. [HL564]

The Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police tells me that it is not his policy to deal with rough sleepers in the area around New Scotland Yard any differently from rough sleepers elsewhere in Westminster. The perimeter of the New Scotland Yard complex is subject to 24-hour police security patrols and this may also have an effect in reducing the incidence of rough sleeping on the north side of Victoria Street in the immediate vicinity of New Scotland Yard.

Religious Organisations: Home Office Consultation

asked Her Majesty's Government:Which faith-based organisations have had meetings with Home Office Ministers specifically to discuss policy in the last year. [HL623]

During the last year, Home Office Ministers have met representatives from the Afro-Caribbean Evangelical Alliance, Al Khoei Foundation, An-Nisa Society, Black Churches Civic Forum, Board of Deputies of British Jews, Breakfast Jewish Forum, Church of England, Hasidic community, Jewish Yemenite community, Muslim College, Muslim Council of Britain, Three Faiths Forum and Union of Muslim Organisations.

National Substance Misuse Treatment Agency

asked Her Majesty's Government:What role the new National Substance Misuse Treatment Agency has had in informing the draft residential care standards for younger adults in relation to people with substance misuse problems. [HL410]

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health
(Lord Hunt of Kings Heath)

The Government began their extensive consultation process on the proposed national minimum standards for care homes for younger adults before the inception of the national treatment agency. The agency's role in setting standards across the substance misuse treatment field will incorporate the new residential care standards once they are finalised, following further consultation with providers.

Nurses: Disclosure Of Addresses

asked Her Majesty's Government:In what circumstances they propose to allow the United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visitors to disclose the home address of registered nurses without their consent. [HL437]

It is for the council to decide how the register will be kept and the means of obtaining access to it. Our proposals for legislation to replace the council envisage that its successor should have a similar power, subject to a duty to consult those affected. They do not require the publication of home addresses of registrants on the register. The responses to consultation are now being carefully considered and a report will be published in due course.

Patients: Intermediate Care

asked Her Majesty's Government:What percentage of patients leaving intermediate care will go to (i) their own home, (ii) sheltered or very sheltered accommodation, (iii) a care home, or (iv) an acute, medical or long stay geriatric ward. [HL460]

Data have not been collected on where people who have left intermediate care have gone.The national research currently being commissioned by the Department of Health to evaluate intermediate care will provide information on this in due course.

asked Her Majesty's Government:What plans, reports or studies are currently being undertaken concerning the provision of intermediate care following the National Health Service Plan; and who is undertaking them. [HL550]

The National Service Framework for Older People, published on 27 March, made it clear that the National Health Service and councils should, by January 2002, agree three-year implementation plans for intermediate care, as part of their local action plans and joint investment plans. These plans will be reviewed by NHS regional offices and social care regions to ensure that they deliver the requirements set out in the NHS Plan and the National Service Framework for Older People. The NHS was asked to submit specific data on investment and activity for intermediate care and community equipment as part of 2001–02 service and financial frameworks (SaFFs). This data is currently being validated. Local action plans for older people's services, submitted as part of the SaFF process, indicated how the 2001–02 'must do' targets and milestones were to be planned for, and included information on how the agreed investment and activity for intermediate care in 2001–02 will be delivered.In addition to local evaluations, the Department of Health is currently commissioning national research which will evaluate intermediate care. The specification for this work asked researchers to focus on hospital acute admissions, lengths of stay, discharges, and re-admissions; health and social outcomes for users and carers; user and carer satisfaction; costs and savings to the NHS and other agencies; as well as the cost-effectiveness of intermediate care.

Nursing Homes: Self-Funders

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will publish and place in the Library of the House, as soon as the information is available, a copy of the composite returns for each health authority of the survey of self-funders in nursing homes in England setting out:

  • (a) the number and type of establishment;
  • (b) the number of registered nursing beds;
  • (c) the number of occupied nursing beds;
  • (d) the number of people registered with a GP indicating where this is (i) within the registering health authority, (ii) within another health authority, (iii) not registered;
  • (e) how many clients pay for full costs of their care (i) to the home directly, (ii) via the local authority, (iii) via an independent third party; and
  • (f) how many receive income support at a preserved rights rate. [HL553]
  • The Department of Health is carrying out a survey of those funding their own care (self-funders) in nursing homes via health authorities. Health authorities have until 27 July to provide all the information on self-fenders. We intend to make available a breakdown of all the data by health authority on the department's website at www.doh.gov.uk/jointunit/freenursingcare during August after this has been analysed.

    Periodontal Disease

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What measures the National Health Service will introduce to tackle the problem revealed by the Adult Dental Health Survey (1998) that some 42 per cent of adults over the age of 21 have a loss of about one-third of root length as a result of periodontal disease; and [HL466]How they intend to respond to the Adult Dental Health Survey (1998) which highlights the widespread incidence of periodontal disease among the adult population; and whether they will invest in periodontal disease care and treatment sufficiently to ensure high quality care and treatment for people suffering from periodontal disease across the United Kingdom. [HL467]

    As well as rewarding dentists for giving preventive care and advice to National Health Service patients, the general dental services contract already provides for both surgical and non-surgical periodontal treatment. The Government are committed to improving access to NHS dentistry. By September anyone requiring dental treatment will be able to find an NHS dentist by calling NHS Direct. We will monitor the effect of improved access to NHS dentistry on periodontal disease.

    National Heart Hospital, Westmoreland Street

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they plan to acquire the National Heart Hospital in Westmoreland Street, London; and, if so, what progress is being made on the acquisition. [HL523]

    The National Health Service is aware that the current owners of the Heart Hospital, a private hospital situated in Westmoreland Street, London, may be trying to dispose of the business. The local NHS trust has made informal soundings and is currently assessing the potential of the facility for NHS use.

    Mentally Handicapped People: Housing

  • (a) mentally handicapped people should be able to live in village communities when that is what they or their families choose;
  • (b) new village communities should be developed to meet demand, including those which could be created by modifying existing hospital sites; and
  • (c) if so, whether they will consider issuing statutory guidance to make sure that such intentions are respected at local level in future. [HL525]
  • Valuing People, the White Paper on learning disability published on 20 March 2001, makes clear that local councils in considering the future housing, care and support needs of people with learning disabilities and their families must ensure that all options are considered. These options should include small-scale ordinary housing, supported living and village and intentional communities. Councils should respect the preferences of individuals and their families, wherever the preferred options will meet individuals' assessed needs and are affordable.It remains the responsibility of local statutory authorities to determine the precise pattern of services to be developed in their area as they are best placed to make such decisions in the light of the Department of Health's guidance and their local knowledge of needs and resources. This could include the development of village communities on suitable hospital sites.We shall be issuing statutory guidance on implementing the proposals set out in

    Valuing People: A New Strategy for Learning Disability for the 21st Century. This will confirm that local authorities must not rule out any of the options when considering the future housing, care and support needs of people with learning disabilities and their families. We are currently consulting on the guidance.

    Nhs Oncology Budgets

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What were the overall oncology budgets for National Health Service trusts in London for each of the last three years; and [HL595]What were the oncology budgets for each of the last three years for (a) Guy's Hospital, (b) the Royal Marsden Hospital and (c) St Thomas' Hospital; and [HL596]What discussions they have had with, and what directions they have given to, the chief executives of health authorities to ensure that budgets in oncology are (a) maintained and (b) spent exclusively on cancer care and cancer services; and [HL597]

    What assessment they have made of shortfalls in National Health Service oncology drugs budgets; and [HL598]

    What plans they have to monitor the distribution of National Health Service oncology drugs budgets to treaters; and [HL599]

    What is their estimate of the percentage of National Health Service oncology drugs budgets received by oncologists. [HL600]

    Resources for oncology, including oncology drugs, are included in general allocations to health authorities. No information is held centrally on oncology or oncology drugs budgets. In 2001–02, health authority allocations nationally included a hypothecated amount of £255 million for increases in expenditure on cancer services and health authorities were asked to set aside specific additional resources from this amount to meet a number of priorities on cancer, including implementing the National Institute for Clinical Excellence guidance on new oncology drugs.

    Nhs Quality Assurance

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What steps they are taking to determine which models of quality systems management in common use would be most appropriate to ensure increased quality assurance in the National Health Service; and [HL601]What plans they have to evaluate the different approaches to quality management taken within the National Health Service, together with the current proven techniques, to determine which approach would best prevent further failures from occurring within the service. [HL602]

    Clinical governance provides National Health Service organisations and health care professionals with a framework for quality improvement which, over time, will develop into a single, coherent local programme for assuring and improving the quality of clinical services.National Health Service organisations are using a number of different tools to help them implement their own local arrangements to achieve the key components of clinical governance. Some organisations have found the generic quality management schemes (for example ISO 9000, the Excellence Model, Charter Mark and Investors in People) to be useful ways into this process, recognising that these schemes share general management principles with the aims of clinical governance and the Government's overall NHS quality strategy.The Cabinet Office document

    Getting it Together—A Guide to Quality Schemes and the Delivery of Public Services, published March 2001, sets out this work in more detail.

    The Commission for Health Improvement's (CHI's) rolling programme of clinical governance reviews of all NHS bodies is under way. These local reviews evaluate the implementation and adequacy of clinical governance arrangements in NHS organisations.

    The commission also has the capacity for rapid investigation and intervention to help the NHS identify and tackle serious or persistent clinical problems. In addition, CHI is conducting national reviews to evaluate the implementation of national standards set in national service frameworks (on topics such as mental health) and the take up of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence guidance.

    The Commission for Health Improvement has now assessed acute and mental health trusts and health authorities (covering primary care). Further reports have been published, including a review of Bedford Hospital NHS Trust, and these routine review reports will now be published on a regular basis.

    We are creating a national patient safety agency in response to the Chief Medical Officer's report An organisation with a memory. This new agency will manage and evaluate the results from the new NHS-wide mandatory reporting scheme for adverse healthcare events to learn and share lessons across the NHS, to help minimise patient risk and improve the quality and safety of care.

    The existence of the agency will, we believe, through its work, very significantly reduce the likelihood of major issues like Shipman and Bristol. It will do this in large part through helping promote a reporting culture throughout the NHS that benefits patient safety.

    An ongoing research project is evaluating the impact of the NHS Modernisation Agency's clinical governance support programme on participating NHS clinical teams. This project is due to finish at the end of 2002.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What plans they have to discuss the basic principles of quality management within the National Health Service, together with the appropriate training of National Health Service staff in these principles, with professional bodies like the Institute of Quality Assurance; and [HL603]What training in quality management principles is provided to National Health Service management and personnel. [HL605]

    The NHS Modernisation Agency is a recently launched major initiative within the National Health Service enabling a wide variety of NHS organisations to involve staff and patients in improving services. The agency is using a variety of quality improvement methods and procedures in its work to support NHS organisations on the ground.The NHS Modernisation Agency combines the work of several pre-existing national teams including the NHS clinical governance support team, national patients access team and primary care development team. The Leadership Centre within the NHS Modernisation Agency also provides access to quality management principles, tools and techniques for NHS leaders.Individual NHS organisations also provide opportunities for their own managers to develop necessary quality management skills through continuing professional development and through other forms of management development offered by academic institutions (for example, Master of Business Administration courses) and professional bodies (for example, the Institute of Health Management).

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What model of quality management system is in use in the National Health Service to establish and evaluate basic performance measures; and [HL604]What steps they have taken to ensure better quality management within the National Health Service. [HL606]

    Quality is the heart of the Government's agenda for modernising the National Health Service. Quality of care is increasingly being taken into account when judging the performance of NHS organisations.The basic elements of the NHS quality management system—as set out in

    A First Class Service—Quality in the new NHS, published in 1998—are all now in place; these are: clear national standards to help raise standards of care and reduce unacceptable variations for specific treatments, conditions and for patient safety, through routes including the National Institute for Clinical Excellence, national service frameworks and a National Cancer Plan; modern organisational delivery mechanisms to implement national standards effectively, dependably and safely—coordinated through comprehensive clinical governance arrangements; and strong monitoring mechanisms—including the Commission for Health Improvement, the NHS Performance Assessment Framework, national and local patient surveys.

    This agenda is underpinned by the Health Act 1999, which places a statutory duty of quality on NHS organisations continuously to monitor and improve the quality of the health care that they provide.

    The NHS Plan, published July 2000, takes this quality agenda further to cover improving customer service and patient/citizen representation and also sets out plans for a new mandatory reporting scheme for adverse healthcare events, to help minimise risks to patients and improve the quality and safety of patient care.

    This is a substantial agenda of reform, requiring major changes to culture and working practices throughout the NHS. However, we have made a good start towards implementing this agenda—increasingly NHS systems and practices are beginning to be refocused on improving quality and people are beginning to get better care as a result.

    Clinical Negligence

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the additional cost to the Department of Health for damages in clinical negligence cases (over and above provisions and estimates totalling £3.9 billion at 31 March as noted by the National Audit Office) arising from the lowering of the discount rate for personal injury cases from 3 to 2½ per cent announced by the Lord Chancellor on 27 June. [HL617]

    The Lord Chancellor's Department is carrying out a full assessment of the impact of the new discount rate, which is being prepared and will be published in due course.

    Nhs Waiting Lists

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many National Health Service patients are waiting more than four weeks for:

  • (a) cataract removal;
  • (b) heart bypass;
  • (c) hernia operation; and
  • (d) knee replacement; and [HL619]
  • How many National Health Service patients have been waiting for an operation for more than four weeks; which are the 10 operations making up the highest percentage of this waiting list; and how many patients have been waiting more than four weeks for each of these 10 operations. [HL689]

    Data on the number of patients currently waiting are only collected by specialty not by procedure and by the number waiting over three months not over four weeks. Therefore, data cannot be provided on the number of patients currently waiting over four weeks for operations.The percentage of patients waiting over three months at the end of May 2001 was 50 per cent.

    Nhs Operations: Cost

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How the cost of the following operation in the United Kingdom National Health Service compares with the costs in France shown in brackets, as reported in

    The Sunday Times on 22 July:

  • (a) cataract removal (£1,000);
  • (b) heart bypass (£7,000);
  • (c) hernia operation (£1,000); and
  • (d) knee replacement (£4,000). [HL620]
  • The costs within the National Health Service compare favourably with those quoted in the article. The following list shows the straightforward comparison, based on the definitions used in the NHS.

    NHS

    Article

    (a) cataract removal (day cases)£568£1,000
    (b) coronary bypass£4,956£7,000
    (c) hernia operation£809£1,000
    (d) knee replacement£4,390£4,000

    In addition the following points should be noted for the figures supplied on the costs within the NHS:

  • (i) the NHS costs are the full costs of the NHS service, including ward and nursing costs etc. associated with the inpatient or day case stay and not just the costs of the surgery itself, except for any stay in critical care;
  • (ii) the average cost of a stay in a coronary care (intensive) care ward is £388 per day and the length of stay in critical care will be dependent on the individual patient;
  • (iii) any ongoing physiotherapy etc. undertaken after the surgery on an outpatient basis is not included;
  • (iv) the day case cost is quoted for cataract surgery as the majority of this type of surgery is undertaken as day cases (81 per cent in 1999–2000);
  • (v) any costs associated with outpatient attendances before and after surgery are separately identified. This is standard practice across the NHS and allows comparison with the private sector, which charges for each element separately.
  • Source: Reference Costs 2000 (published November 2000 by Department of Health).

    Religious Organisations: Department Of Health Consultation

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Which faith-based organisations have had meetings with Department of Health Ministers specifically to discuss policy in the last year. [HL624]

    Care Homes For Younger Adults: Standards

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether, in the light of the latest findings of the national treatment outcome research study, they will consider whether the national minimum standards for care homes for younger adults will undermine the ability of drug and alcohol treatment services to ensure residents' engagement with therapy and to prevent social isolation. [HL647]

    The draft national minimum standards for care homes for younger adults place strong emphasis on meeting the assessed needs of service users and providing appropriate programmes of care. The Government have carried out an in-depth consultation exercise targeted specifically at service users with drug or alcohol problems and we will continue to take users' views into account when developing these standards.

    Anti-Psychotic Medication

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What work has been undertaken to explain the trend in prescribing of anti-psychotic medication;

    Estimated number of prescription items dispensed in the community for anti-psychotic drugs by broad age group 1999 England
    Prescription items dispensed by community pharmacists and appliance contractors onlyPrescription items dispensed by dispensing doctors and items personally administeredAll prescription items dispensed in the community
    (Thousands)(Thousands)
    Health authority in which item was dispensedChildren aged 0–15 yearsElderly people aged 60 and overAged 16 to 59 yearsAll agesAll ages
    ExemptCharged (3)
    Bedfordshire0.116.013.54.23.237.0
    North Essex0.432.129.26.67.675.8
    South Essex0.923.920.34.90.350.3
    North West Anglia0.03.43.61.01.89.8
    Suffolk0.327.616.85.210.160.0
    East and North Hertfordshire0.118.113.64.21.437.4
    West Hertfordshire0.119.416.05.20.341.0
    Cambridgeshire0.320.017.05.510.753.5
    Norfolk0.230.134.67.914.787.5
    Total Eastern Region2.4190.6164.544.750.0452.3
    Hillingdon0.05.86.92.00.014.7
    Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster0.17.014.42.50.024.0
    Enfield and Haringey0.116.322.73.80.042.8
    Redbridge and Waltham Forest0.316.915.73.40.036.3
    Bexley and Greenwich0.215.612.13.00.030.9
    Bromley0.111.98.02.40.022.4
    Croydon0.011.915.92.90.030.7
    Kingston and Richmond0.111.59.63.20.024.4
    Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham0.225.532.24.00.061.9
    Merton, Sutton and Wandsworth0.121.822.84.70.049.3
    Barking and Havering0.214.012.83.40.030.4
    Barnet0.116.310.13.20.029.8
    Brent and Harrow0.112.717.53.50.033.9
    Camden and Islington0.09.526.32.80.038.6
    Ealing, Hammersmith and Hounslow0.220.229.65.20.055.1
    East London and The City0.513.533.83.20.051.1
    Total London Region2.0230.4290.453.30.0576.2
    South Lancashire0.112.89.53.50.226.1
    Liverpool0.426.133.92.70.063.0
    Manchester0.122.839.83.70.066.4
    Morecambe Bay0.118.814.73.42.039.0
    St Helens and Knowsley0.117.523.62.90.044.1
    Salford and Trafford0.229.729.84.80.064.5
    Sefton0.117.923.72.70.044.4
    Stockport0.226.519.94.70.051.2

    what are the key findings; and whether they will set out prescription numbers for such medication in each of the last five years for each region and health authority for each of the following age groups (i) 0 to 15 years, (ii) 16 to 59 years, and (in) 60 years and over. [HL671]

    No work has been done at this stage to explain the recent trends in prescribing of anti-psychotic medication although the figures are monitored. The National Institute for Clinical Excellence is expected to issue guidance on the use of atypical anti-psychotic drugs in December. The available information relates to anti-psychotic medicines dispensed in the community for 1999 and 2000 only; these are set out in the table and are estimates derived from a 1 in 20 sample of prescription items.

    Estimated number of prescription items dispensed in the community for anti-psychotic drugs by broad age group 1999 England

    Prescription items dispensed by community pharmacists and appliance contractors only

    Prescription items dispensed by dispensing doctors and items personally administered

    All prescription items dispensed in the community

    (Thousands)

    (Thousands)

    Health authority in which item was dispensed

    Children aged 0–15 years

    Elderly people aged 60 and over

    Aged 16 to 59 years

    All ages

    All ages

    Exempt

    Charged (3)

    West Pennine0.119.822.53.90.046.4
    Bury and Rochdale0.321.123.74.20.049.3
    North Cheshire0.115.217.83.40.136.6
    South Cheshire0.232.722.95.62.563.8
    East Lancashire0.225.230.36.00.662.2
    North West Lancashire0.127.924.25.20.958.2
    Wigan and Bolton0.028.524.65.10.058.2
    Wirral0.017.925.13.80.046.8

    Total North West Region

    2.4

    360.3

    385.9

    65.3

    6.2

    820.2

    Bradford0.221.726.94.00.853.7
    County Durham and Darlington0.328.727.46.45.167.8
    East Riding and Hull0.125.222.45.03.355.9
    Gateshead and South Tyneside0.319.418.53.40.241.8
    Leeds0.237.538.78.00.584.8
    Newcastle and North Tyneside0.228.529.04.40.062.1
    North Cumbria0.213.213.33.42.932.9
    Northumberland0.111.410.92.31.526.2
    Sunderland0.113.211.51.90.026.7
    Tees0.327.525.94.50.158.4
    Wakefield0.215.013.23.61.533.5
    North Yorkshire0.327.618.05.78.259.8
    Calderdale and Kirklees0.328.923.35.50.658.6

    Total Northern & Yorkshire Region

    2.8

    297.9

    278.9

    58.0

    24.6

    662.3

    Berkshire0.224.120.87.22.454.8
    Buckinghamshire0.220.016.85.22.544.7
    East Kent0.427.924.54.23.560.5
    West Kent0.333.831.18.93.978.1
    East Surrey0.016.911.13.80.932.8
    West Surrey0.121.917.46.10.746.3
    East Sussex, Brighton and Hove0.238.135.56.82.182.7
    West Sussex0.240.319.97.83.471.6
    Northamptonshire0.319.719.95.23.248.2
    Oxfordshire0.114.814.34.96.640.7
    North and Mid Hampshire0.418.815.96.13.744.9
    Portsmouth and South East Hampshire0.326.319.64.10.450.7
    Southampton and South West Hampshire0.324.621.46.71.054.1
    Isle Of Wight0.17.55.50.90.414.4

    Total South East Region

    3.2

    335.0

    273.7

    77.9

    34.7

    724.4

    Somerset0.418.513.83.33.439.4
    South and West Devon0.329.432.35.41.568.9
    Wiltshire0.223.319.55.52.851.3
    Avon0.541.638.48.31.890.6
    Cornwall and Isles Of Scilly0.619.919.63.58.251.7
    Dorset0.734.124.36.93.669.6
    North and East Devon0.520.319.54.24.849.3
    Gloucestershire0.519.515.25.44.745.4

    Total South West Region

    3.8

    206.7

    182.5

    42.4

    30.7

    466.1

    Barnsley0.111.011.02.70.925.7
    North Derbyshire0.116.013.33.12.334.7
    Southern Derbyshire0.225.618.05.02.150.8
    Doncaster0.113.412.42.60.529.0
    Leicestershire0.430.633.27.12.774.0
    Lincolnshire0.327.518.55.614.666.5
    North Nottinghamshire0.220.910.23.21.135.6
    Nottingham0.127.219.25.91.554.0
    Rotherham0.217.39.92.20.329.9

    Estimated number of prescription items dispensed in the community for anti-psychotic drugs by broad age group 1999

    England

    Prescription items dispensed by community pharmacists and appliance contractors only

    Prescription items dispersed by dispensing doctors and items personally administered

    All prescription items dispensed in the community

    (Thousands)

    (Thousands)

    Health authority in which item was dispensed

    Children aged 0–15 years

    Elderly people aged 60 and over

    Aged 16 to 59 years

    All ages

    All ages

    Exempt

    Charged (3)

    Sheffield0.224.021.73.70.149.6
    South Humber0.113.012.33.04.432.8

    Total Trent Region

    2.0226.5179.644.230.5482.7
    Birmingham1.142.156.47.40.0107.0
    Coventry0.115.215.83.30.134.5
    Dudley0.213.012.73.80.029.6
    Herefordshire0.15.24.91.32.614.1
    Sandwell0.112.513.72.40.028.6
    Shropshire0.216.813.33.44.137.8
    Solihull0.05.37.62.00.014.9
    North Staffordshire0.124.018.05.31.148.5
    South Staffordshire0.422.215.15.14.347.1
    Walsall0.216.113.82.70.032.7
    Warwickshire0.219.315.14.74.543.8
    Wolverhampton0.110.511.22.00.023.8
    Worcestershire0.221.613.93.43.442.4

    Total West Midlands Region

    3.0

    223.7

    211.4

    46.8

    20.0

    504.9

    England

    21.7

    2,071.0

    1,966.9

    432.5

    196.8

    4,689.0

    Notes

    1. The age related information is based on an analysis of those not required to pay a charge indicated by the categories completed on the back of the prescription form. The estimates are based on a 1 in 20 sample of all prescription items submitted to the Prescription Pricing Authority by community pharmacists and appliance contractors only. Dispensing doctor prescriptions were not analysed into categories in 1999. Personally administered items are free of charge. Small numbers in the original sample may cause some variation in the estimates.

    2. Antipsychotics are defined within British National Formulary paragraph 4.2.1, antipsychotic drugs.

    3. Charged prescriptions also includes prescriptions obtained by patients with a pre-payment certificate.

    Estimated number of prescription items dispensed in the community for anti-psychotic drugs by broad age group 1999

    England

    Prescription items dispensed by community pharmacists and appliance contractors only

    Prescription items dispersed by dispensing doctors and items personally administered

    All prescription items dispensed in the community

    (Thousands)

    (Thousands)

    Health authority in which item was dispensed

    Children aged 0–15 years

    Elderly people aged 60 and over

    Aged 16 to 59 years

    Exempt

    Charged (3)

    All ages

    All ages

    Bedfordshire0.317.615.74.33.441.2
    North Essex0.335.129.66.57.979.5
    South Essex0.724.722.75.90.354.2
    Suffolk0.329.218.65.310.163.6
    East and North Hertfordshire0.118.414.84.71.539.5
    West Hertfordshire0.222.414.85.20.342.9
    Cambridgeshire0.424.119.77.111.462.8
    Norfolk0.233.640.68.415.698.3

    Total Eastern Region

    2.6

    205.1

    176.4

    47.4

    50.5

    482.0

    Hillingdon0.17.25.92.30.015.7
    Kensington and Chelsea And Westminster0.07.415.73.30.026.3
    Enfield and Haringey0.116.224.83.90.044.9

    Estimated number of prescription items dispensed in the community for anti-psychotic drugs by broad age group, 2000

    England

    Prescription items dispensed by community pharmacists and appliance contractors only

    Prescription items dispensed by-dispensing doctors and items personally administered

    All prescription items dispensed in the community

    (Thousands)

    (Thousands)

    Health authority and region in which item was dispensed

    Children aged 0–15 years

    Elderly people aged 60 and over

    Aged 16 to 59 years

    Exempt

    Charged (3)

    All ages

    All ages

    Red bridge and Waltham Forest0.318.714.84.00.037.7
    Bexley and Greenwich0.215.712.72.90.031.5
    Bromley0.012.57.82.70.022.9
    Croydon0.213.616.32.90.033.0
    Kingston and Richmond0.112.69.63.90.026.1
    Lambeth, Southwark And Lewisham0.227.635.14.50.067.3
    Merton, Sutton and Wandsworth0.325.223.15.30.053.9
    Barking and Havering0.115.312.83.70.031.9
    Barnet0.016.411.13.30.030.7
    Brent and Harrow0.013.118.54.20.035.7
    Camden and Islington0.19.626.53.10.039.4
    Ealing, Hammersmith and Hounslow0.220.231.85.80.058.0
    East London and The City0.214.736.03.60.054.5

    Total London Region

    2.1

    245.9

    302.3

    59.2

    0.0

    609.6
    South Lancashire0.213.310.93.70.228.2
    Liverpool0.126.736.13.30.066.3
    Manchester0.323.843.53.90.071.5
    Morecambe Bay0.220.014.34.12.240.8
    St Helens and Knowsley0.219.424.73.60.047.9
    Salford and Trafford0.234.230.85.20.070.4
    Sefton0.120.923.33.70.048.0
    Stockport0.226.921.84.70.053.6
    West Pennine0.121.523.44.40.049.4
    Bury and Rochdale0.122.024.55.10.051.8
    North Cheshire0.215.118.23.70.137.4
    South Cheshire0.233.825.56.42.368.2
    East Lancashire0.327.132.55.90.666.3
    North West Lancashire0.329.127.55.50.863.2
    Wigan and Bolton0.231.126.95.40.063.6
    Wirral0.121.523.73.90.049.3

    Total North West Region

    2.8

    386.5

    407.7

    72.7

    6.2

    876.0

    Bradford0.223.726.74.20.254.9
    County Durham and Darlington0.530.130.46.94.972.7
    East Riding and Hull0.126.023.45.43.758.6
    Gateshead and South Tyneside0.219.718.72.90.141.7
    Leeds0.338.842.18.10.589.8
    Newcastle and North Tyneside0.430.430.94.40.066.1
    North Cumbria0.314.712.63.73.134.4
    Northumberland0.311.811.82.61.628.2
    Sunderland0.212.711.32.40.026.6
    Tees0.528.927.44.30.261.3
    Wakefield0.116.213.73.71.535.1
    North Yorkshire0.228.917.56.08.561.1
    Calderdale and Kirklees0.331.125.35.80.663.2

    Total Northern & Yorkshire Region

    3.5

    313.0

    291.8

    60.4

    24.9

    693.5

    Berkshire0.226.021.38.12.658.1
    Buckinghamshire0.223.116.96.52.349.0
    East Kent0.926.625.44.83.561.2
    West Kent0.635.232.79.14.081.6
    East Surrey0.217.310.23.60.932.2
    West Surrey0.222.918.26.50.748.5
    East Sussex, Brighton And Hove0.438.637.47.52.186.0
    West Sussex0.442.122.39.23.477.4
    Northamptonshire0.319.519.86.23.248.9
    Oxfordshire0.216.814.55.27.143.8
    North and Mid Hampshire0.619.116.76.03.646.0
    Portsmouth and South East Hampshire0.327.921.44.60.354.5

    Estimated number of prescription items dispensed in the community for anti-psychotic drugs by broad age group, 2000

    England

    Prescription items dispensed by community pharmacists and appliance contractors only

    Prescription items dispensed by-dispensing doctors and items personally administered

    All prescription items dispensed in the community

    (Thousands)

    (Thousands)

    Health authority and region in which item was dispensed

    Children aged 0–15 years

    Elderly people aged 60 and over

    Aged 16 to 59 years

    Exempt

    Charged (3)

    All ages

    All ages

    Southampton and South West Hampshire0.226.622.07.61.057.4
    Isle of Wight0.07.36.31.30.515.4

    Toted South East Region

    4.6

    348.8

    285.2

    86.1

    35.2

    759.9

    Somerset0.320.215.03.13.141.7
    South and West Devon0.432.434.95.71.474.8
    Wiltshire0.125.119.95.92.853.8
    Avon0.443.743.08.61.897.5
    Cornwall and Isles Of Scilly0.619.021.83.18.052.6
    Dorset0.633.724.56.13.468.3
    North and East Devon0.521.119.94.34.850.5
    Gloucestershire0.421.215.95.44.747.6

    Total South West Region

    3.3

    216.2

    194.9

    42.2

    30.0

    486.8

    Barnsley0.010.810.52.60.924.6
    North Derbyshire0.118.313.83.72.338.2
    Southern Derbyshire0.225.819.05.02.051.9
    Doncaster0.213.512.83.00.530.0
    Leicestershire0.432.335.28.22.778.8
    Lincolnshire0.427.719.75.814.968.5
    North Nottinghamshire0.221.010.33.51.236.3
    Nottingham0.229.119.75.81.556.4
    Rotherham0.123.511.21.90.236.9
    Sheffield0.223.720.44.10.148.5
    South Humber0.314.012.22.84.333.6

    Total Trent Region

    2.3

    239.5

    184.9

    46.4

    30.5

    503.7

    Birmingham1.144.358.58.10.0111.9
    Coventry0.214.517.93.40.136.2
    Dudley0.214.712.93.70.031.5
    Herefordshire0.15.85.01.12.614.6
    Sandwell0.113.512.12.60.028.3
    Shropshire0.216.814.63.84.239.6
    Solihull0.07.36.72.10.016.2
    North Staffordshire0.126.017.65.31.050.0
    South Staffordshire0.524.217.24.83.950.6
    Walsall0.116.413.42.90.032.7
    Warwickshire0.320.215.85.24.646.2
    Wolverhampton0.111.012.21.80.025.1
    Worcestershire0.423.614.53.73.145.3

    Total West Midlands Region

    3.6

    238.2

    218.3

    48.6

    19.5

    528.2

    England

    24.8

    2,193.2

    2,061.6

    463.1

    197.0

    4,939.7

    Notes

    1. The age related information is based on an analysis of those not required to pay a charge indicated by the categories completed on the back of the prescription form. The estimates are based on a 1 in 20 sample of all prescription items submitted to the Prescription Pricing Authority by community pharmacists and appliance contractors only. Dispensing doctor prescriptions were not analysed into categories for most of 2000. Personally administered items are free of charge. Small numbers in the original sample may cause some variation in the estimates.

    2. Antipsychotics are defined within British National Formulary paragraph 4.2.1, antipsychotic drugs.

    3. Charged prescriptions also includes prescriptions obtained by patients with a pre-payment certificate.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will indicate the cost to the National Health Service of prescriptions of anti-psychotic medication (a) in total and (b) for those aged 60 and over [HL672]

    The available information relates to anti-psychotic medicines dispensed in the community; this is set out in the table. Reliable information is not available about the cost of anti-psychotic medication used by hospitals.

    The estimated net ingredient cost of prescription items dispensed in the community for anti-psychotic drugs by broad age group 2000

    England

    Prescription items dispensed by community pharmacists and appliance contractors only

    Prescription items dispensed by dispensing doctors and items personally administered

    All prescription items dispensed in the community

    (£ Thousands)

    (£ Thousands)

    Children aged 0–15 years

    Elderly people aged 60 and over

    Aged 16 to 59 years

    Exempt

    Charged (3)

    All ages

    All ages

    55424.00754.33212.7552.89394.540

    Notes

    1. The age related information is based on an analysis of those not required to pay a charge indicated by the categories completed on the back of the prescription form. The estimates are based on a 1 in 20 sample of all prescription items submitted to the Prescription Pricing Authority by community pharmacists and appliance contractors only. Dispensing doctor prescriptions were not analysed into categories for most of 2000. Personally administered items are free of charge.

    2. Anti-psychotics are defined within British National Formulary paragraph 4.2.1, antipsychotic drugs.

    3. Charged prescriptions also includes the net ingredient cost of prescriptions obtained by patients with a pre-payment certificate.

    4. The net ingredient cost (NIC) is the basic cost of a drug and does not take account of discounts, dispensing costs, fees or prescription charges income.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will give the numbers of prescriptions dispensed for anti-psychotic medicine to hospital patients in each health authority in England for the following ages:

  • (a) up to 16;
  • (b) 16 to 59; and
  • (c) 60 and over. [HL675]
  • Data of prescriptions dispensed for anti-psychotic medicine in hospitals are not available centrally.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will give the numbers of prescriptions dispensed for anti-psychotic medicine to non-hospital patients in each health authority in England for the following ages:

  • (a) up to 16;
  • (b) 16 to 59; and
  • (c) 60 and over. [HL676]
  • The number of prescription items dispensed in the community in England for atypical anti-psychotic drugs, 1999 and 2000, are provided in the table. These are estimates derived from a one in 20 sample of prescription items.

    Number of prescription items dispensed in the community in England for atypical anti-psychotic drugs, 1999 and 2000
    England
    Prescription items (thousands)
    Health Authority in which item was dispsensed19992000
    Avon13.421.7
    Barking and Havering5.18.0
    Barnet6.910.1
    Barnsley2.64.1
    Bedfordshire4.710.3
    Berkshire11.216.2
    Bexley and Greenwich5.78.1
    Birmingham16.725.3
    Bradford6.810.5

    Number of prescription items dispensed in the community in England for atypical anti-psychotic drugs, 1999 and 2000

    England

    Prescription items (thousands)

    Health Authority in which item was dispsensed

    1999

    2000

    Brent and Harrow8.712.6
    Bromley4.86.6
    Buckinghamshire9.414.7
    Bury and Rochdale6.49.6
    Calderdale and Kirklees8.514.3
    Cambridgeshire8.613.2
    Camden and Islington8.211.4
    Cornwall and Isles of Scilly6.28.5
    County Durham and Darlington8.513.7
    Coventry7.812.0
    Croydon7.510.9
    Doncaster4.05.0
    Dorset10.313.8
    Dudley3.14.3
    Ealing, Hammersmith and Hounslow10.715.6
    East and North Hertfordshire6.810.3
    East Kent12.016.5
    East Lancashire9.313.9
    East London and The City12.417.4
    East Riding and Hull10.114.5
    East Surrey5.87.3
    East Sussex, Brighton and Hove15.522.0
    Enfield and Haringey8.613.2
    Gateshead and South Tyneside6.58.9
    Gloustershire5.48.3
    Herefordshire1.32.1
    Hillingdon2.53.5
    Isle of Wight3.34.9
    Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster7.611.1
    Kingston and Richmond5.48.4
    Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham15.722.8
    Leeds17.123.5
    Leicestershire11.616.8
    Lincolnshire6.510.2
    Liverpool12.818.1
    Manchester12.718.7
    Merton, Sutton and Wandsworth12.918.4
    Morecambe Bay6.29.1
    Newcastle and North Tyneside15.621.6
    Norfolk9.115.5
    North and East Devon9.112.8

    Number of prescription items dispensed in the community in England for atypical anti-psychotic drugs, 1999 and 2000

    England

    Prescription items (thousands)

    Health Authority in which item was dispsensed

    1999

    2000

    North and Mid Hampshire10.214.2
    North Cheshire3.85.6
    North Cumbria5.98.9
    North Derbyshire3.95.8
    North Essex12.919.0
    North Nottinghamshire4.25.6
    North Staffordshire5.27.9
    North West Anglia0.80.0
    North West Lancashire8.714.5
    North Yorkshire8.812.6
    Northamptonshire8.610.8
    Northumberland5.17.6
    Nottingham2.13.1
    Oxfordshire9.814.5
    Portsmouth and South East Hampshire8.212.7
    Red bridge and Waltham Forest8.211.7
    Rotherham4.17.1
    Salford and Trafford8.313.8
    Sandwell3.64.7
    Sefton6.710.5
    Sheffield5.27.1
    Shropshire6.59.2
    Solihull2.54.0
    Somerset5.18.3
    South and West Devon10.917.4
    South Cheshire11.517.9
    South Essex8.713.8
    South Humber3.45.9
    South Lancashire4.27.0
    South Staffordshire6.59.5
    Southampton and South West Hampshire11.317.2
    Southern Derbyshire3.36.1
    St Helens and Knowsley7.110.9
    Stockport5.38.9
    Suffolk7.011.4
    Sunderland4.86.7
    Tees8.612.6
    Wakefield5.39.1
    Walsall5.05.7
    Warwickshire8.811.8
    West Hertfordshire8.212.1
    West Kent14.121.4
    West Pennine5.08.8
    West Surrey8.913.1
    West Sussex12.016.6
    Wigan and Bolton9.416.0
    Wiltshire10.414.1
    Wirral8.913.6
    Wolverhampton4.25.5
    Worcestershire3.97.0

    England

    772.6

    1,149.4

    Notes:

    1. The prescription information is from the Prescription Cost Analysis (PCA) system and is based on a full analysis of all prescriptions dispensed in the community, i.e. by community pharmacists and appliance contractors, dispensing doctors and prescriptions.

    2. Atypical antipsychotics are defined within British National Formulary paragraph 4.2.1, antipsychotic drugs, and cover the drug Amisulpride, Clozapine, Olanzapine, Quetiapine, Risperidone and Zotepine.

    Nhs Waiting Lists

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will rank health authorities in England in order of the highest waiting times per weighted head of population for hospital operations using as the measures (a) those waiting over six months for in-patient treatments; (b) those waiting over 12 months for in-patient treatments; and what proportion of those people waiting are aged (i) 0 to 15 years, (ii) 16 to 59 years, and (iii) 60 years and over. [HL.673]

    The information in the tables relates to all patients awaiting admission to hospital on 31 May 2001. Patients awaiting operations are not identifiable separately nor is an age split possible. Population figures have been weighted on the basis of age and need.

    Patients waiting more than 6 months per weighted head of population
    Health Authority
    West Surrey HA0.010
    West Sussex HA0 010
    North Cheshire HA0.009
    East Kent HA0.009
    West Kent HA0.009
    East Surrey HA0.009
    Barking & Havering HA0.008
    Redbridge & Waltham Forest HA0.008
    Cornwall & Isles of Scilly HA0.008
    Southampton & SW Hampshire HA0.008
    North Essex HA0.008
    Lambeth, Southwark & Lewisham HA0.007
    East Sussex Brighton and Hove HA0.007
    Salford & Trafford HA0.007
    North & East Devon HA0.007
    Avon HA0.007
    Suffolk HA0.007
    Croydon HA0.007
    South Lancashire HA0.007
    South Essex HA0.007
    South Staffordshire HA0.007
    Bexley, Bromley & Greenwich HA0.007
    Kingston & Richmond HA0.007
    Hertfordshire HA0.007
    Northamptonshire HA0.007
    Isle of Wight, Portsmouth & South East Hampshire HA0.006
    South and West Devon HA0.006
    Lincolnshire HA0.006
    Wakefield HA0.006
    North Cumbria HA0.006
    Sefton HA0.006
    Barnet, Enfield & Haringey HA0.006
    South Humber HA0.006
    Somerset HA0.006
    East Riding & Hull HA0.006
    South Cheshire HA0.006
    Wiltshire HA0.006
    Norfolk HA0.006
    Buckinghamshire HA0.006
    Stockport HA0.006
    Bedfordshire HA0.006
    North & Mid Hampshire HA0.006
    East Lancashire HA0.005
    Manchester HA0.005
    St Helens & Knowsley HA0.005
    Leeds HA0.005
    Wigan & Bolton HA0.005

    Patients waiting more than 6 months per weighted head of population

    Health Authority

    Ealing, Hammersmith & Hounslow HA0.005
    South Derbyshire HA0.005
    Worcestershire HA0.005
    North Derbyshire HA0.005
    Liverpool HA0.005
    Cambridgeshire HA0.005
    Brent & Harrow HA0.005
    Oxfordshire HA0.005
    North Yorkshire HA0.005
    Berkshire HA0.005
    North Nottinghamshire HA0.005
    Hillingdon HA0.005
    East London & City HA0.004
    Bury & Rochdale HA0.004
    Gateshead & South Tyneside HA0.004
    Sheffield HA0.004
    Bradford HA0.004
    West Pennine HA0.004
    Morecambe Bay HA0.004
    Merton, Sutton & Wandsworth HA0.004
    Sunderland HA0.004
    Tees HA0.004
    North West Lancashire HA0.004
    Herefordshire HA0.004
    Warwickshire HA0.004
    Nottingham HA0.004
    Shropshire HA0.004
    Leicestershire HA0.004
    County Durham & Darlington HA0.003
    Camden & Islington HA0.003
    Newcastle & North Tyneside HA0.003
    Northumberland HA0.003
    Wirral HA0.003
    Wolverhampton HA0.003
    Coventry HA0.003
    North Staffordshire HA0.003
    Solihull HA0.003
    Dudley HA0.003
    Calderdale & Kirklees HA0.003
    Gloucestershire HA0.003
    Barnsley HA0.002
    Birmingham HA0.002
    Kensington, Chelsea & Westminster HA0.002
    Sandwell HA0.002
    Rotherham HA0.002
    Doncaster HA0.002
    Walsall HA0.001
    Dorset HA0.000

    Patients waiting more than 12 months per weighted head of population

    Health Authority

    West Surrey HA0.003
    West Sussex HA0.002
    North Cheshire HA0.002
    Lambeth, Southwark & Lewisham HA0.002
    Salford & Trafford HA0.002
    Southampton & SW Hampshire HA0.002
    East Kent HA0.002
    Croydon HA0.002
    Redbridge & Waltham Forest HA0.002
    East Surrey HA0.002
    West Kent HA0.002
    Isle of Wight, Portsmouth & South East Hampshire HA0.002
    North Essex HA0.002
    Avon HA0.002
    East Sussex Brighton and Hove HA0.001
    Manchester HA0.001
    North & East Devon HA0.001

    Patients waiting more than 12 months per weighted head of population

    Health Authority

    Cornwall & Isles of Scilly HA0.001
    Barking & Havering HA0.001
    South and West Devon HA0.001
    Kingston & Richmond HA0.001
    Hertfordshire HA0.001
    Bedfordshire HA0.001
    Barnet, Enfield & Haringey HA0.001
    Norfolk HA0.001
    Wiltshire HA0.001
    South Staffordshire HA0.001
    Bexley, Bromley & Greenwich HA0.001
    Buckinghamshire HA0.001
    Liverpool HA0.001
    Ealing, Hammersmith & Hounslow HA0.001
    Northamptonshire HA0.001
    Sefton HA0.001
    Hillingdon HA0.001
    St Helens & Knowsley HA0.001
    Brent & Harrow HA0.001
    North & Mid Hampshire HA0.001
    Merton, Sutton & Wandsworth HA0.001
    South Cheshire HA0.001
    Suffolk HA0.001
    Lincolnshire HA0.001
    East London & City HA0.001
    Stockport HA0.001
    Wigan & Bolton HA0.001
    Cambridgeshire HA0.001
    South Lancashire HA0.001
    Oxfordshire HA0.001
    Worcestershire HA0.001
    Somerset HA0.001
    Camden & Islington HA0.001
    South Essex HA0.001
    Bury & Rochdale HA0.001
    Shropshire HA0.001
    Berkshire HA0.001
    Herefordshire HA0.001
    West Pennine HA0.001
    North Cumbria HA0.001
    Morecambe Bay HA0.001
    East Riding & Hull HA0.001
    Wakefield HA0.000
    Leeds HA0.000
    North Staffordshire HA0.000
    Wirral HA0.000
    Leicestershire HA0.000
    South Derbyshire HA0.000
    North West Lancashire HA0.000
    Nottingham HA0.000
    East Lancashire HA0.000
    Dudley HA0.000
    Coventry HA0.000
    Calderdale & Kirklees HA0.000
    Kensington, Chelsea & Westminster HA0.000
    Newcastle & North Tyneside HA0.000
    Birmingham HA0.000
    Gloucestershire HA0.000
    North Yorkshire HA0.000
    Tees HA0.000
    Bradford HA0.000
    Northumberland HA0.000
    Wolverhampton HA0.000
    County Durham & Darlington HA0.000
    North Nottinghamshire HA0.000
    North Derbyshire HA0.000
    Warwickshire HA0.000
    Sunderland HA0.000
    Gateshead & South Tyneside HA0.000
    South Humber HA0.000
    Sheffield HA0.000
    Walsall HA0.000

    Patients waiting more than 12 months per weighted head of population

    Health Authority

    Solihull HA0.000
    Sandwell HA0.000
    Barnsley HA0.000
    Rotherham HA0.000
    Doncaster HA0.000
    Dorset HA0.000

    Source:

    Department of Health monthly monitoring

    Patient Discharge Delays

    asked Her Majesty's Government:For England and for each health authority in England, what is the number of patients whose discharge from hospital is delayed in each of the following age groups (i) 0 to 15 years, (ii) 16 to 59 years, and (iii) 60 years and over, and what were the reasons for such delays. [HL674]

    Information is not available centrally in the form requested. Information on the delayed discharges of patients aged over 75 years is collected from each health authority on a quarterly basis. That information has been collected on a consistent basis for the last two years and has been placed in the Library.

    Kohll And Decker Judgments

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What assessment they have made of the

    Kohll and Decker cases decided by the European Court of Justice and their consequences for National Health Service patients. [HL677]

    The Department of Health has fully considered the judgments of the European Court of Justice in the cases of Kohll and Decker and concluded that they have no direct effect on National Health Service patients. These judgments were given in the context of Luxembourg national health insurance law, in circumstances which are not replicated in NHS law within the United Kingdom.

    Tobacco Advertising And Promotion Bill

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is their estimate of the number of smoking-related premature deaths that would be avoided per year by the measures contained in the Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Bill. [HL678]

    Smoking causes around 120,000 deaths a year in total in the United Kingdom. The likely eventual net effect of measures such as those contained in the Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Bill would be to decrease tobacco consumption, and the size of the decrease could lie in a range up to about 5 per cent. It is reasonable to use the mid-point of this range (2.5 per cent.) to indicate the likely effects of a ban and on this basis we estimate that in the longer term up to 3,000 lives a year could be saved.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is their estimate of the number of smoking-related premature deaths that would result from a two year delay in introducing the measures contained in the Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Bill. [HL679]

    We have not made such an estimate. We consider it reasonable to estimate that in the longer term a total of 3,000 lives a year in the United Kingdom could be saved by measures such as those in the Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Bill.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is their estimate of how much smoking costs the National Health Service each year, and how much money would be saved each year in the National Health Service by the introduction of a ban on tobacco advertising. [HL680]

    Smoking related diseases are estimated to cost the National Health Service in the United Kingdom around £1.5 billion to £1.8 billion each year. If a ban on tobacco advertising led to the estimated 2.5 per cent. reduction in consumption, between about £20 million and £40 million per year might be saved from the NHS budget in England alone. Further proportionate savings could be expected with regard to expenditure in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:(a) How much money they spend each year on advertising and education programmes aimed at stopping people smoking; and (b) what estimate they made of the advertising budget of the tobacco industry in the United Kingdom when preparing to introduce last Session's Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Bill. [HL681]

    Expenditure on health education campaigns aimed at stopping people smoking in the current and last two years is as follows:

    • 1999–2000: £15.9 million
    • 2000–01: £13.73 million
    • 2001–02: £13.3 million has already been allocated
    The regulatory impact assessment published in connection with the Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Bill stated that approximately £100 million was spent annually by United Kingdom tobacco companies on tobacco advertising and promotion, comprising £50 million on press and poster advertising, £8 million on sports sponsorship other than Formula One, £35 million on sponsorship of the Formula One Grand Prix circuit and about £7 million on direct marketing.More recent research suggests that the current figure for Formula One sponsorhip by UK tobacco companies is in the region of £70 million.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What targets they have set for reductions in tobacco consumption by 2010; what proportion of these targets rely on reductions in tobacco advertising; what proportion of targets for the reduction of coronary heart disease and cancer rely on reductions in tobacco advertising; and what legislation is needed to achieve these targets. [HL682]

    The White Paper Smoking Kills published in December 1998 set the following targets for 2010:

  • (a) to reduce adult smoking (aged 16 and over) in all social classes so that the overall rate falls from 28 per cent. [1996] to 24 per cent. or less by the year 2010;
  • (b) to reduce smoking among 11–15 year olds from 13 per cent. [1996] to 9 per cent. or less by 2010;
  • (c) to reduce the percentage of women who smoke during pregnancy from 23 per cent. [1995] to 15 per cent. by the year 2010.
  • The NHS Cancer Plan in September 2000 added an additional target:(d) to reduce smoking among manual social groups from 32 per cent. [1998] to 26 per cent. by 2010.The White Paper

    Our Healthier Nation, published in July 1999 set the following targets for reducing mortality from coronary heart disease and cancer:

  • (a) to reduce the death rate from cancer in people under 75 by at least a fifth by 2010—saving up to 100,000 lives in total;
  • (b) to reduce the death rate from coronary heart disease and stroke and related diseases in people under 75 years by at least two-fifths by 2010—saving up to 200,000 lives in total.
  • Tobacco use is a major contributory factor in many cases of cancer and coronary heart disease. Any fall in tobacco consumption as a result of reductions in tobacco advertising will contribute towards reaching these targets, as will a range of other policies designed to reduce the harmful effects of tobacco consumption on public health.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What estimate they have made of the possible reduction of annual tobacco consumption in the United Kingdom as a result of a ban on tobacco advertising; and whether this can only be achieved with legislation to ban tobacco advertising throughout the European Union. [HL683]

    The likely eventual net effect of measures such as those contained in the Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Bill would be to decrease tobacco consumption, and the size of the decrease could lie in a range up to about 5 per cent. It is reasonable to use the mid-point of this range to indicate the likely effects of a ban. The Government believe that these reductions could be delivered by domestic legislation.The Government support European Union action to ban transnational tobacco advertising as this would prevent advertising originating in other Member States having an effect in the United Kingdom.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What meetings the Secretary of State for Health, his special advisers or officials have held with representatives of the tobacco industry since January 2000 to discuss tobacco, tobacco advertising or the protection of employees from passive smoking at work; and [HL684]What meetings the Secretary of State for Health, his special advisers or officials have held with members of the advertising industry to discuss tobacco; and [HL685]What meetings the Prime Minister, members of his policy unit or private staff have held with representatives of the tobacco industry since January 2000 to discuss tobacco, tobacco advertising or the protection of employees from passive smoking at work; and [HL686]What meetings the Prime Minister, members of his policy unit or private staff have held with members of the advertising industry to discuss tobacco. [HL687]

    It is not the normal practice of government to release details of meetings or discussions with private individuals or companies.

    Nursing Homes: Free Nursing Care

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether each health authority or primary care trust will be required to draw up its own eligibility criteria in implementing free nursing care in nursing homes. [HL688]

    Detailed draft guidance issued on 17 July, outlines a standard approach to assessment which will enable National Health Service staff to make consistent decisions throughout the country. The guidance can be found on the Department of Health's website at www.doh.gov.uk/jointunit/freenursingcare.

    Maxillo-Facial Trauma Services

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Why, in view of the Royal College of Surgeons' recommendation of 24-hour availability of maxillofacial surgery on the site of all accident and emergency departments, the Royal Free Hospital maxillo-facial unit is to be closed; and [HL690]Why the consultant maxillo-facial surgeon post for work at the Royal Free Hospital was withdrawn one week before the date proposed for interviewing the already short-listed candidates. [HL691]

    The Royal College of Surgeons' recommendation outlined in the Better Care for the Severely Injured Report advocates a requirement for oral and maxillo-facial trauma services to provide 24 hours cover. However the facilities need not be on site and can be derived from network arrangements between adjacent hospitals. The Royal Free Hospital has complied with this recommendation. Following the retirement of the previous postholder, and after unsuccessfully trying to recruit to this post, it was concluded that without senior staff the service was no longer viable. It was therefore agreed that the Eastman Dental Hospital, part of University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, should provide cover for facial trauma for the Royal Free. A protocol was agreed with the accident and emergency department at the Royal Free Hospital and the arrangement has been running satisfactorily since April 2001.After the Royal Free Hospital failed to recruit a consultant, an attempt was made to create a joint oral surgery post between University College London NHS Trust and the Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust.At a late stage in the process, University College London indicated that it did not have sufficient funding for its element of the post and had to withdraw. It was subsequently agreed that the Eastman Dental Hospital should provide facial trauma cover for the Royal Free. This arrangement has been running satisfactorily since April 2001 and as a result there are no current plans to create another joint oral surgery post.

    Residential Care Standards For Younger Adults

    asked Her Majesty's Government:In the case of treatment of drug and alcohol addicts, how the requirements in the draft residential care standards for younger adults that staff should only enter service users' bedrooms with their permission can be reconciled with the requirement that service users are safeguarded from self harm. [HL692]

    The draft national minimum standards for care homes for younger adults were developed after extensive consultation with service users and providers. They make explicit reference to individualised procedures for service users at risk of self-harm (or harming others) and provide for any limitations on choice and freedom to be agreed with the service user and specified in the care plan.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:In the case of treatment of drug and alcohol addicts, how the requirement in the draft residential care standards for younger adults that staff should only enter service users' bedrooms with their permission can be reconciled with the requirement under Section 8 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 that home owners should use all reasonable and readily available means to prevent the supply and use of prohibited substances on their premises. [HL693]

    The draft national minimum standards for care homes for younger people were developed after widespread consultation with service users and providers. They make explicit provision for any limitations on choice and freedom imposed by a specialist programme to be agreed with the service user and recorded in the individual care plan.

    Human Rights Act 1998

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Bach on 2 May 2000 (

    WA 156), whether they consider the Human Rights Act 1998 to be sufficiently "bedded down" to allow them to sign the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights allowing the individual right of petition; and, if not, why not; and [HL611]

    Further to the Written Answer by the Baroness Scotland of Asthal on 20 March 2000 ( WA 1), whether they consider the Human Rights Act 1998 to be sufficiently "bedded in" to allow them to sign the Optional Protocol to the United Nations Convention for the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women; and, if not, why not; and [HL612]

    Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Bassam of Brighton on 12 April 2000 ( WA 50), whether they consider the Human Rights Act 1998 to be sufficiently well "implemented" and "bedded down" to allow them to sign the Optional Protocol to the United Nations Convention Against Torture; and, if not, why not. [HL613]

    The Act has been fully in force for only ten months. When it has bedded down we will again review the case for allowing the right of individual petition under these United Nations human rights instruments.

    Personal Injury Cases

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the estimate of the additional cost to public funds (identifying, where possible, the separate costs to public bodies, government departments and local authorities) arising from the lowering of the discount rate for personal injury cases from 3 to 2½ per cent announced by the Lord Chancellor on 27 June. [HL618]

    A full assessment of the impact of the new discount rate is being prepared and will be published in due course.

    Court Records: Access

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the average time taken to gain access to court records stored on the legacy systems using the new Libra infrastructure; and what was the average time taken to gain access under the pre-Libra dedicated terminals. [HL702]

    Response times for the main legacy systems on the new Libra infrastucture are tested as part of the acceptance procedures for Libra at each magistrates' courts committee to ensure that they are comparable to those previously recorded under the pre-Libra arrangements. There is no national average time as the latter differ for each MCC.

    Democracy And The Will Of The People

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Privy Seal on 3 July (

    WA 36) that it is false to suggest that democracy is about the will of the people to be paramount, because,

    "we must have clear laws and independent and objective means of administering them; anything else would risk lynch law and mob rule",

    whether they consider that a democratically-elected or predominantly-elected second Chamber would risk "lynch law and mob rule"; and [HL561]

    Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Privy Seal on 3 July ( WA 36) that the,

    "necessary institutions and safeguards of mature democracy extend well beyond those circumstances where it is appropriate for the will of the people to be paramount",

    whether they will list those institutions and safeguards which they do not believe should be ultimately accountable; and [HL562]

    Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Privy Seal on 3 July ( WA 36) which referred to the need for,

    "clear laws and independent and objective means of administering them; anything else would risk lynch law and mob rule",

    whether they believe that the police should be democratically accountable. [HL563]

    In bringing forward its further proposals for the reform of the House of Lords, the Government will aim to improve the workings of the constitution without risking lynch law and mob rule. On the more general question of constitutional accountability, the arrangements which govern central and local government, including the police, and the system of justice are many and varied. Any major proposals to change them would be brought forward in legislation in the normal way, as necessary.

    Raf Akrotiri And Dhekelia

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many United States military and civilian personnel respectively are deployed at RAF Akrotiri and Dhekelia respectively, as at the latest convenient date. [HL608]

    A small number of US military and civilian personnel are deployed to the sovereign base areas. This number fluctuates slightly from time to time.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What role RAF Akrotiri and Dhekelia play in the implementation of the United States space based infra-red system (SBIRS). [HL609]

    Droit De Suite

    droit de suite levy will become part of British law; how they intend to inform the public of its introduction; and what arrangements are being made to prepare for this. [HL648]

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Trade and Industry
    (Lord Sainsbury of Turville)

    Droit de suite is a new and complex right. The Government plan to introduce the levy on 1 January 2006—that is, on the last day allowed by the directive harmonising the right. A notice informing the public of the legislation will be mounted on the Patent Office's website at the appropriate time. However, the Government intend to consult widely on transposition of the directive into national law and those affected will be aware, in advance, of the legislation.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What are the sale price bands and tapering scale of rates of

    droit de suite as now agreed at the European level. [HL649]

    The royalty rates are:

  • (a) 4 per cent of the portion of the sale price up to EUR 50,000 (£30,750);
  • (b) 3 per cent for the portion of the sale price EUR 50,000.01 to 200,000 (£30,750 to £123,000);
  • (c) 1 per cent of the portion of the sale price from EUR 200,000.01 to 350,000 (£123,000 to £215,250);
  • (d) 0.5 per cent for the portion of the sale price from EUR 350,000.01 to 500,000 (£215,000 to £307,500);
  • (e) 0.25 per cent for the portion of the sale price exceeding EUR 500,000 (£307,500).
  • By way of derogation, member states may apply a rate of 5 per cent for the portion of the sale price up to EUR 50,000. They may also set a minimum sale price from which sales shall be subjected to

    droit de suite, but this price must not exceed EUR 3000 (£1,845). If a lower minimum is set, the member state may determine the rate applicable up to EUR 3000; but this must not be lower than 4 per cent. The total royalty payable may not exceed EUR 12,500 (£7,687). [Sterling equivalents are based on a prevailing conversion rate of 1 EUR = 61.5 pence].

    Incapacity Benefit

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will give the source and method of calculation behind the figures quoted by the Prime Minister in his assertion on 4 July (HC Deb, col. 254) that people coming on to incapacity benefit will be paid on average £4,000 a year for 10, 15 or 20 years without any checks as to their recovery or ability to work; and [HL433]Following the Prime Minister's assertion that people coming on to incapacity benefit will be paid on average about £4,000 a year for 10, 15 or 20 years without any checks as to their recovery or ability to work (HC Deb, 4 July, col. 254), whether they will clarify which permanently or severely disabling conditions will exempt an incapacity benefit claimant from an eligibility review. [HL434].

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Work and Pensions
    (Baroness Hollis of Heigham)

    The Disability Rights Commission has stated that 1 million disabled people not in work say they would like to work. We have a duty to help them do so. My right honourable friend the Prime Minister was quoting the type of case that can arise under the regime.The proposed changes announced by my right honourable friend the Secretary of State on 11 July (Commons

    Official Report col. 567W) do not change

    the current exemptions from medical testing which apply to the most severely disabled people. However, they will ensure that there is a review at least every three years to make sure people are getting all the help they need.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many recipients of incapacity benefit are not subject to further medical tests because of the severity of their disabilities; and what percentage of incapacity benefit recipients as a whole they represent. [HL621]

    The information is in the table.

    Thousands
    Total number of Incapacity Benefit (IB) recipients at 28 February 2001Number exempt from the Personal Capability Assessment (PCA) due to severe medical conditionsPercentage of IB recipients
    1,515.2366.724.2

    Notes:

    1. Although people with severe medical conditions do not have to undergo the whole PCA their cases may be reviewed from time to time to ensure that the criteria is satisfied.

    2. The table excludes national insurance credits only cases.

    3. The figures are taken from a 5 per cent sample of the benefit computer system and exclude a small number of cases held clerically.

    4. Figures are expressed as thousands and are rounded to the nearest hundred.

    Sick Or Disabled People: Benefit Applications

    asked Her Majesty's Government:For each of the past five years for which figures are available, how many applications for all the benefits available to sick or disabled people were made; how many were rejected for failing the medical test; how many appealed; and how many appeals were successful. [HL554]

    The available information is in the tables.Information is available on the total number of appeals made against decisions in respect of all of these benefits. However, information on the number of people who appealed because they were disallowed benefit following a medical test is not available separately.

    New claims figures for Incapacity Benefit, Severe Disablement Allowance and Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit (IIDB)
    YearIncapacity BenefitSevere Disablement AllowanceIndustrial Injuries Disablement Benefit
    1996 to 19971,062,81788,65070,600
    1997 to 19981,012,98148,82996,200
    1998 to 1999930,00244,27273,200

    New claims figures for Incapacity Benefit, Severe Disablement Allowance and Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit (IIDB)

    Year

    Incapacity Benefit

    Severe Disablement Allowance

    Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit

    1999 to 2000907,59746,92068,800
    2000 to 2001873,49148,38675,400

    Notes:

    1. Figures for incapacity benefit and severe disablement allowance are taken from Central Data Unit 100 per cent counts.

    2. Figures for industrial injuries disablement benefit (IIDB) are based on a 10 per cent sample and are rounded to the nearest hundred.

    3. Figures are for the period 1 April to 31 March in each year shown.

    4. Since 6 April 2001 new claims to severe disablement allowance are not accepted.

    5. Some people who claimed severe disablement allowance may have been required to take a medical test before benefit could be paid but information is not available on the numbers involved.

    6. People receiving IIDB are required to take a medical examination before benefit can be awarded, although IIDB can be disallowed without such an examination. Information is not available on the number of people who have been disallowed IIDB following a medical examination.

    7. People who claim incapacity benefit are not required to take a medical test at the outset of a claim.

    New claims and disallowances following a medical test for Disability Living Allowance

    Year

    New claims

    New claims disallowed following a medical test

    1996 to 1997517,58894,182
    1997 to 1998461,35992,168
    1998 to 1999398,27777,817
    1999 to 2000392,59986,954
    2000 to 2001410,26991,465

    Notes:

    1. Figures are taken from 100 per cent Management Information System data.

    2. Figures are for the period 1 April to 31 March in each year shown.

    New claims and disallowances following a medical test for Attendance Allowance

    Year

    New claims

    New claims disallowed following a medical test

    1996 to 1997460,99640,157
    1997 to 1998412,25030,345
    1998 to 1999414,01428,274
    1999 to 2000395,16636,252
    2000 to 2001408,26131,602

    Notes:

    1. Figures are taken from 100 per cent Management Information System data.

    2. Figures are for the period 1 April to 31 March in each year shown.

    Disability Living Allowance: Appeals And Withdrawals

    asked Her Majesty's Government:In how many cases the withdrawal of disability living allowance following medical examinations by the SEMA company, on behalf of the Benefits Agency, was reversed by appeal tribunals in the last full year for which figures are available. [HL569]

    The information is not available, as statistics on the outcomes of appeals do not distinguish cases where the original decision appealed against was made following a medical examination.

    Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What individuals or organisations requested the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission to make its call of 18 July for the Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary to stop using "plastic bullets". [HL570]

    The Minister of State, Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions
    (Lord Falconer of Thoroton)

    These are matters for the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission. The Chief Commissioner has been asked to write to the noble Lord. A copy of his letter will be placed in the Library.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission considered police regulations on the use of baton rounds before it made its call on 18 July for the Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary to stop using "plastic bullets". [HL572]

    These are matters for the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission. The Chief Commissioner has been asked to write to the noble Lord. A copy of his letter will be placed in the Library.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission has considered paragraphs 9.12 to 9.17 of the report of the independent commission on policing for Northern Ireland (the Patten report), where it is reported that overseas police officers would use live rounds if confronted with the circumstances of Northern Ireland. [HL573]

    These are matters for the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission. The Chief Commissioner has been asked to write to the noble Lord. A copy of his letter will be placed in the Library.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will name the "Chief Constables in England" cited in the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission's call of 18 July for the Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary to stop using "plastic bullets". [HL574]

    These are matters for the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission. The Chief Commissioner has been asked to write to the noble Lord. A copy of his letter will be placed in the Library.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What efforts the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission made to ascertain the circumstances in which the Royal Ulster Constabulary uses "plastic bullets" before issuing its call on 18 July for the Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary to stop using them. [HL575]

    These are matters for the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission. The Chief Commissioner has been asked to write to the noble Lord. A copy of his letter will be placed in the Library.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What authority the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission has for its claim, in its call of 18 July for the Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary to stop using "plastic bullets", that the new plastic bullets "appear[s]" to be even more dangerous than those used before 1 June. [HL663]

    These are matters for the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission. The Chief Commissioner has been asked to write to the noble Lord. A copy of his letter will be placed in the Library.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What authority the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission had, in its call of 18 July for the Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary to stop using "plastic bullets", for the claim that it was a "disproportionate use of force". [HL664]

    These are matters for the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission. The Chief Commissioner has been asked to write to the noble Lord. A copy of his letter will be placed in the Library.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What convention rights the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission was relying upon in its call of 18 July for the Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary to stop using "plastic bullets"; and what cases of the European Commission on Human Rights or the European Court of Human Rights it was relying upon. [HL665]

    These are matters for the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission. The Chief Commissioner has been asked to write to the noble Lord. A copy of his letter will be placed in the Library.

    Public Entertainment Licences

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether councils have statutory duties to ensure that licensees implement appropriate public safety measures in public houses and restaurants for all activities taking place, irrespective of whether those activities require a public entertainment licence. [HL670]

    The Minister of State, Department for Culture, Media and Sport
    (Baroness Blackstone)

    Responsibility for enforcing health and safety legislation in England and Wales is shared by the Health and Safety Executive and the local authorities, but in the case of on-licensed premises is mainly the responsibility of the local authority. In addition, under the current law, licensing justices may seek undertakings relating to public safety measures in on-licensed premises before granting liquor licences; and local authorities may attach reasonable terms and conditions relating to public safety to public entertainment licences.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the Department for Culture, Media and Sport has responsibility for public entertainment licensing; and how they ensure that any advice they give is consistent. [HL669]

    Responsibility for public entertainment licensing policy was transferred from the Home Office to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport on 8 June this year. The administration and enforcement of public entertainment licensing law remain the statutory responsibility of the local authorities. The department offers advice where it can be helpful to inquirers; but the interpretation of public entertainment licensing law is ultimately a matter for the courts. Whenever it has been considered necessary to issue guidance to local authorities for the promotion of consistency in good practice, the Home Office approach has been to issue circulars to local authorities, thus ensuring that the same guidance reaches all. Where possible circulars have been issued jointly with the Local Government Association. We expect to adopt a similar practice.

    The Solicitor-General

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Who were the sponsors or referees that supported the Solicitor-General in her application for a patent as Queen's Counsel. [HL636]

    The Solicitor-General was made Queen's Counsel upon her appointment which is in accordance with past practice. There were no sponsors or referees.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the Solicitor-General has received a certificate to practise advocacy in the High Court; and, if so, when. [HL637]

    The Solicitor-General does not have a certificate to practise advocacy in the High Court.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the Solicitor-General holds any office in the Bar Council. [HL638]

    The Solicitor-General is an ex-officio member of the Bar Council.

    Pdvn: Annual Expenditure

    asked the Chairman of Committees:What is the current annual expenditure on the Parliamentary Data and Video Network; and what expenditure is projected for each of the next five years. [HL568]

    Estimates for PDVN expenditure for the current year and the three following years are given in the table below. Estimates for 2005–06 and 2006–07 have not yet been made.Since PDVN staffing is under review, the estimates for 2002–05 may be subject to considerable variation. In order to provide at least an indicative projection for PDVN overall costs, this year's estimated staff costs have been extended forward in the calculations. All figures for later years may also, of course, be subject to change as a result of normal budgetary and forecasting processes. Telecommunications and administration costs are excluded.The House of Commons contributes 85 per cent of the total PDVN costs; the House of Lords 15 per cent.

    YearPDVN costs (£)
    2001–024,284,600
    2002–033,692,900
    2003–044,157,400
    2004–053,958,800
    2005–06Not yet estimated
    2006–07Not yet estimated

    Religious Organisations: Consultation With The Department For Education And Skills

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Which faith-based organisations have had meetings with Department for Education and Skills Ministers specifically to discuss policy in the last year. [HL625]

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Education and Skills
    (Baroness Ashton of Upholland)

    In the last year, Department for Education and Skills Ministers have met representatives of the Church of England, the Roman Catholic Church, the Methodist Church, the Free Church Federal Council and the Muslim Education Co-ordinating Council (UK) to discuss policy.Officials held a meeting with all the national faith organisations which provide maintained schools on 25 May to discuss the Green Paper,

    Schools Building on Success.

    Childcare Strategy: Expenditure

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will give, for the most recent available year, expenditure on Childcare Strategy in each county in England and Wales. [HL652]

    We only have information on expenditure on the National Childcare Strategy relating to England. Expenditure in Wales is a matter for the Welsh Assembly. Annex 1 shows expenditure in 2000–01 for each local authority from grants made by the former Department for Education and Employment. This excludes other childcare expenditure such as the working families tax credit, grants to students, independent local authority expenditure and grants made from the New Opportunities Fund for which local authority figures are not available.

    Local AuthorityExpenditure on childcare 2000–01 (£)
    Barking & Dagenham178,559
    Barnet327,310
    Barnsley289,733
    Bath & North East Somerset147,538
    Bedfordshire378,933
    Bexley222,610
    Birmingham1,397,818
    Blackburn UA276,939
    Blackpool UA148,780
    Bolton450,467
    Bournemouth UA135,748
    Bracknell Forest UA103,563
    Bradford678,203
    Brent320,831
    Brighton & Hove UA240,154
    Bristol, City of516,647
    Bromley252,621
    Buckinghamshire410,040
    Bury230,190
    Calderdale195,705
    Cambridgeshire580,381
    Camden204,476
    Cheshire648,163
    City of London49,650
    Cornwall487,185
    Coventry383,168
    Croydon373,095
    Cumbria481,544
    Darlington UA116,478
    Derby UA286,190
    Derbyshire624,516
    Devon617,224

    Local Authority

    Expenditure on childcare 2000–01 (£)

    Doncaster351,669
    Dorset302,066
    Dudley378,206
    Durham545,878
    Ealing346,862
    East Riding of Yorkshire219,066
    East Sussex466,439
    Enfield272,340
    Essex1,144,642
    Gateshead230,632
    Gloucestershire514,620
    Greenwich362,061
    Hackney337,204
    Halton UA155,860
    Hammersmith & Fulham218,520
    Hampshire1,131,405
    Haringey302,562
    Harrow247,094
    Hartlepool UA104,752
    Havering228,949
    Herefordshire, County of148,494
    Hertfordshire832,270
    Hillingdon235,745
    Hounslow263,221
    Isle of Wight128,792
    Isles of Scilly42,000
    Islington252,133
    Kensington & Chelsea182,859
    Kent1,444,683
    Kingston upon Hull, City of351,286
    Kingston upon Thames123,157
    Kirklees397,678
    Knowsley283,261
    Lambeth417,557
    Lancashire1,106,726
    Leeds807,583
    Leicester UA428,391
    Leicestershire547,823
    Lewisham298,972
    Lincolnshire453,238
    Liverpool776,220
    Luton UA282,844
    Manchester706,315
    Medway (Rochester & Gillingham)254,759
    Merton178,602
    Middlesbrough249,963
    Milton Keynes UA192,545
    NE Lincolnshire203,557
    Newcastle upon Tyne340,977
    Newham392,932
    Norfolk702,466
    North Lincolnshire UA172,561
    North Somerset170,377
    North Tyneside183,219
    North Yorkshire552,887
    Northamptonshire545,220
    Northumberland263,940
    Nottingham UA348,416
    Nottinghamshire659,015
    Oldham289,280
    Oxfordshire541,382
    Peterborough UA177,376
    Plymouth240,522
    Poole UA122,973
    Portsmouth UA222,301
    Reading UA149,938
    Redbridge200,863
    Redcar & Cleveland UA164,866
    Richmond upon Thames141,287
    Rochdale265,112
    Rotherham277,377
    Rutland UA74,219
    Salford349,040

    Local Authority

    Expenditure on childcare 2000–01 (£)

    Sandwell330,140
    Sefton314,468
    Sheffield623,746
    Shropshire239,454
    Slough UA135,574
    Solihull184,252
    Somerset443,937
    South Gloucestershire212,898
    South Tyneside222,846
    Southampton UA225,729
    Southend UA161,346
    Southwark400,075
    St Helens213,762
    Staffordshire658,630
    Stockport278,071
    Stockton-on-Tees UA296,953
    Stoke-on-Trent312,160
    Suffolk622,669
    Sunderland354,767
    Surrey869,738
    Sutton168,993
    Swindon (Thamesdown)219,122
    Tameside257,536
    Telford & Wrekin UA171,645
    Thurrock UA99,445
    Torbay UA116,087
    Tower Hamlets308,354
    Trafford226,748
    Wakefield363,129
    Walsall303,941
    Waltham Forest211,419
    Wandsworth298,985
    Warrington UA191,664
    Warwickshire465,945
    West Berkshire (Newbury)132,519
    West Sussex724,042
    Westminster207,005
    Wigan316,091
    Wiltshire381,032
    Windsor & Maidenhead UA118,451
    Wirral404,912
    Wokingham UA110,719
    Wolverhampton297,299
    Worcestershire421,596
    York UA143,180

    Childcare Provision In Rural Counties And Urban Areas

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What estimates they can make of the difference in cost of developing and sustaining childcare provision in rural counties and urban areas. [HL653]

    We do not have arty information to suggest that there are overall differences in the cost of developing and sustaining childcare provision in rural counties and urban areas. Early years development and childcare partnerships in each local authority area are responsible for ensuring that particular attention is paid to the development and maintenance of childcare services in rural and disadvantaged areas.

    Specialist Schools: Pupil Performance

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What evidence they have to support their contention that shifting to specialist status improves pupil performance in secondary schools. [HL658]

    Research carried out by the London School of Economics calculated that between 1994–98 the average annual rate increase in GCSE A*-C performance in specialist schools was half as much again as in non-specialist maintained schools. On the same measure, specialist schools continued to improve faster than the national average for all other schools between 1997 and 2000 when the percentage point improvement for pupils gaining 5+ A*-C grades at GCSE in specialist schools throughout this period was 6.1 compared with 4.1 in other maintained schools. Research carried out by Professor David Jesson of York University also shows that specialist schools are performing very well on value added scores. Comparing results of 1995 key stage 2 tests with GCSE results in 2000, comprehensive specialist schools achieved a value added of + 5.4 percentage points compared to -1.1 for all other comprehensive schools. Last year the percentage of pupils gaining 5 or more GCSEs at A*-C grades was 54 per cent in specialist schools compared with 45 per cent in other maintained schools.

    Childcare Development Targets

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What childcare development targets they have set for each county in England and Wales; and which counties have met those targets to date. [HL654]

    We have only information relating to England. Targets in Wales are a matter for the Welsh Assembly. Childcare targets for each local authority are agreed with early years development and childcare partnerships (EYDCPs). These targets are based on the findings of their local audits of childcare provision and the Government's own national strategic targets. A wide range of targets for the development of childcare is set.Annex 1 shows the overall targets for new childcare places created and actual places achieved by each local authority area in the most recent available year, 2000–01.Annex 2 shows the overall targets for new childcare places to be created for the next three years from 2001 to 2004.

    Achievement of 2000–01 Targets
    TargetActualDifference
    Barking & Dagenham44252381
    Bamet954727-227
    Barnsley40045151
    Bath & North East Somerset36443066
    Bedfordshire1,0521,391339
    Bexley825986161

    Achievement of 2000–01 Targets

    Target

    Actual

    Difference

    Birmingham2,0003,1051,105
    Blackburn UA55157827
    Blackpool UA390730340
    Bolton4221,203781
    Bournemouth UA861394-467
    Bracknell Forest UA486236-250
    Bradford9927,5696,577
    Brent520754234
    Brighton & Hove UA530779249
    Bristol1,2191,023-196
    Bromley628874246
    Buckinghamshire5902,7672,177
    Bury304468164
    Calderdale540494-46
    Cambridgeshire2,9822,208-774
    Camden514801287
    Cheshire2,2782,987709
    City of London57278221
    Cornwall2,0002,610610
    Coventry1,1391,21273
    Croydon9801,06484
    Cumbria9751,287312
    Darlington UA492435-57
    Derby UA400661261
    Derbyshire3,1042,496-608
    Devon1,8082,8451,037
    Doncaster5821,006424
    Dorset990712-278
    Dudley827638-189
    Durham1,4001,861461
    Ealing455935480
    East Riding of Yorkshire5451,398853
    East Sussex1,1961,697501
    Enfield5865937
    Essex2,6503,461811
    Gateshead580791211
    Gloucestershire2,9003,350450
    Greenwich7481,047299
    Hackney460592132
    Halton UA46054888
    Hammersmith & Fulham504459-45
    Hampshire4,3837,5993,216
    Haringey1,5851,399-186
    Harrow500466-34
    Hartlepool28030727
    Havering480361-119
    Herefordshire, County of45050959
    Hertfordshire3,0002,781-219
    Hillingdon54263593
    Hounslow353342-11
    Isle of Wight210440230
    Isles of Scilly345925
    Islington388519131
    Kensington & Chelsea18427288
    Kent2,4322,668236
    Kingston upon Hull510647137
    Kingston upon Thames343714371
    Kirklees1,2491,27526
    Knowsley210682472
    Lambeth5301,474944
    Lancashire2,2913,5871,296
    Leeds2,4002,224-176
    Leicester UA840485-355
    Leicestershire1,4501,705255
    Lewisham420350-70
    Lincolnshire1,6481,412-236
    Liverpool800955155
    Luton UA8001.092292
    Manchester7401,109369
    Medway (Rochester & Gillingham)300619319

    Achievement of 2000–01 Targets

    Target

    Actual

    Difference

    Merton3483535
    Middlesbrough424540116
    Milton Keynes UA1,3711,237-234
    Newcastle upon Tyne967664-303
    Newham310585275
    Norfolk7401,529789
    North East Lincolnshire454760306
    North Lincolnshire UA420187-233
    North Somerset471747276
    North Tyneside668651-17
    North Yorkshire1,8982,679781
    Northamptonshire1,3002,228928
    Northumberland1,255797-458
    Nottingham UA57066393
    Nottinghamshire2,2502,427177
    Oldham424598174
    Oxfordshire1,2801,486206
    Peterborough UA8841,241357
    Plymouth4841,5201,036
    Poole UA889301-588
    Portsmouth UA280673393
    Reading UA350999649
    Redbridge600485-115
    Redcar & Cleveland UA247347100
    Richmond upon Thames376828452
    Rochdale760752-8
    Rotherham398805407
    Rutland UA174316142
    Salford68772134
    Sandwell976551-425
    Sefton354495141
    Sheffield1,1501,21262
    Shropshire930914-16
    Slough UA495304-191
    Solihull592738146
    Somerset1,4451,638193
    South Gloucestershire606595-11
    South Tyneside499385-114
    Southampton UA947672-275
    Southend UA453421-32
    Southwark825940115
    St. Helens512479-33
    Staffordshire3,0502,313-737
    Stockport410781371
    Stockton-on-Tees UA390380-10
    Stoke-on-Trent675491-184
    Suffolk1,1501,009-141
    Sunderland957671-286
    Surrey5003,5433,043
    Sutton600875275
    Swindon (Thames Down)551924373
    Tameside405513108
    Telford & Wrekin UA718644-74
    Thurrock UA532510-22
    Torbay UA286391105
    Tower Hamlets675356-319
    Trafford697605-92
    Wakefield656533-123
    Walsall670910240
    Waltham Forest76683468
    Wandsworth300464164
    Warrington UA626556-70
    Warwickshire602754152
    West Berkshire (Newbury)350922572
    West Sussex1,4742,9891,515
    Westminster4251,044619
    Wigan820700-120
    Wiltshire1,1201,734614
    Windsor & Maidenhead UA600812212
    Wirral1,000747-253
    Wokingham UA205590385

    Achievement of 2000–01 Targets

    Target

    Actual

    Difference

    Wolverhampton711625-86
    Worcestershire8102,3761,566
    York UA5301,123593
    Totals129,358168,22338,865

    Childcare Place Targets

    2001–02

    2002–03

    2003–04

    Barking & Dagenham452665655
    Barnet1,1421,163998
    Barnsley294492570
    Bath & North East Somerset741844829
    Bedfordshire1,2701,6001,190
    Bexley1,063728582
    Birmingham3,0704,2004,925
    Blackburn UA744417158
    Blackpool UA592751444
    Bolton812792819
    Bournemouth UA459602709
    Bracknell Forest UA726801402
    Bradford1,9362,0391,527
    Brent445495545
    Brighton & Hove UA603761711
    Bristol1,2101,2781,278
    Bromley1,1871,384720
    Buckinghamshire2,1332,3142,191
    Bury527586581
    Calderdale862763787
    Cambridgeshire1,5771,5121,328
    Camden813620396
    Cheshire3,6883,1202,493
    City of London46416
    Cornwall2,7302,7382,642
    Coventry6701,2001,316
    Croydon1,1251,1251,015
    Cumbria2,5201,8781,478
    Darlington UA576462422
    Derby UA530509131
    Derbyshire2,0942,2971,444
    Devon2,2732,3741,984
    Doncaster1,0741,3071,362
    Dorset1,4321,3151,160
    Dudley442727747
    Durham2,2141,9151,715
    Ealing1,1671,31711,437
    East Riding of Yorkshire1,121980600
    East Sussex1,6441,8281,814
    Enfield1,2481,3131,283
    Essex4,4743,2992,359
    Gateshead1,092515196
    Gloucestershire2,5002,5002,500
    Greenwich750800750
    Hackney548398398
    Halton UA663404402
    Hammersmith & Fulham1,021414252
    Hampshire7,2187,2187,218
    Haringey1,005300220
    Harrow483430430
    Hartlepool UA332403388
    Havering540456457
    Herefordshire, County of578594565
    Hertfordshire5,3895,7922,499
    Hillingdon1,1231,6001,550
    Hounslow632502536
    Isle of Wight438341288
    Isles of Scilly1356060
    Islington488593190
    Kensington & Chelsea475467322
    Kent2,1283,2882,128
    Kingston upon Hull1,0941,345629

    Childcare Place Targets

    2001–02

    2002–03

    2003–04

    Kingston upon Thames401564196
    Kirklees1,3731,5581,288
    Knowsley1,020630180
    Lambeth574623365
    Lancashire3,0503,0903,036
    Leeds1,9031,7471,109
    Leicester UA1,164985652
    Leicestershire4,1424,2964,503
    Lewisham956504432
    Lincolnshire1,6071,7361,903
    Liverpool1,2511,2521,192
    Luton UA9901,0531,076
    Manchester1,5541,1631,212
    Medway (Rochester & Gillingham)931900522
    Merton380612534
    Middlesbrough662330317
    Milton Keynes UA1,3051,203696
    Newcastle upon Tyne1,046835553
    Newham711908991
    Norfolk3,2393,1662,941
    North East Lincolnshire392495478
    North Lincolnshire UA451455429
    North Somerset8271,2251,559
    North Tyneside803624254
    North Yorkshire2,7852,5331,144
    Northamptonshire1,1211,8852,210
    Northumberland572666460
    Nottingham UA8561,1231,357
    Nottinghamshire2,5122,5622,612
    Oldham1,0101,2901,190
    Oxfordshire1,9342,3682,568
    Peterborough UA643495495
    Plymouth1,6981,357613
    Poole UA341341345
    Portsmouth UA676507167
    Reading UA498412345
    Redbridge727982796
    Redcar & Cleveland UA508413189
    Richmond upon Thames662600436
    Rochdale687805893
    Rotherham842930762
    Rutland UA188117116
    Salford692703616
    Sandwell6251,170745
    Sefton8281,135926

    Childcare Place Targets

    2001–02

    2002–03

    2003–04

    Sheffield1,6971,9241,064
    Shropshire1,0181,2891,101
    Slouth UA602432264
    Solihull706476302
    Somerset1,5231,538901
    South Gloucestershire1,0461,144762
    South Tyneside6918701,037
    Southampton UA793827726
    Southend UA416375231
    Southwark680680630
    St Helens796752336
    Staffordshire2,4202,4742,524
    Stockport6041,0851,033
    Stockton-on-Tees UA729855650
    Stoke-on-Trent425625425
    Suffolk2,2162,1661,903
    Sunderland1,4321,2941,294
    Surrey1,7132,8921,862
    Sutton637831469
    Swindon (Thamesdown)428458352
    Tameside748828828
    Telford & Wrekin UA9861,117889
    Thurrock UA395468309
    Torbay UA38627097
    Tower Hamlets690920891
    Trafford572673448
    Wakefield9591,1251,130
    Walsall920745690
    Waltham Forest1,963891764
    Wandsworth591716515
    Warrington UA7281,017628
    Warwickshire2,5522,0782,079
    West Berkshire (Newbury)516319216
    West Sussex2,5272,0031,634
    Westminster407398148
    Wigan1,1401,2041,251
    Wiltshire1,6601,6801,626
    Windsor & Maidenhead UA600400400
    Wirral1,4191,5091,719
    Wokingham UA586511451
    Wolverhampton7551,0351,028
    Worcestershire2,4152,6802,515
    York UA1,0569801,349
    Total178,719181,874154,605