Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 633: debated on Monday 25 March 2002

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers The First Written Answer Should Have Been Printed In The Official Report Of Wednesday, 20 March

Monday, 25th March 2002.

Baltic Centre For Contemporary Art

asked Her Majesty's Government:What sum has been committed by the Arts Council of England to the development of the Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art in Gateshead, Tyne and Wear; and what are the terms under which that amount has been so allocated. [HL3269]

The Minister of State, Department for Culture, Media and Sport
(Baroness Blackstone)

The Arts Council has committed £33,885,000 to Baltic Flour Mills for the capital development, plus a further £7,500,000 which has been allocated as annual revenue support over five years.The Arts Council issues standard conditions, which are publicly available, and special conditions, which are not, due to commercial confidentiality. Both sets of conditions are closely monitored by the Arts Council.

asked Her Majesty's Government:Which Government departments have made awards or loans to Gateshead Council for the development of the Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art in Gateshead, Tyne and Wear; what is the amount of such awards or loans; and what are the terms under which the sums were made available. [HL3268]

As well as the lottery funding from the Arts Council, the Baltic Centre for Contemporary Arts has also received £9,349,000 from the Single Regeneration Budget, the European Regional Development Fund and English Partnerships as well as some private sponsorship. The details of any contracts with these bodies are commercially sensitive and not for Ministers to comment on.

North West Tourist Board

asked Her Majesty's Government:What funding has been given to the North West Tourist Board in the years 1998–99, 1999–2000, 2000–01 and the present financial year to date. [HL3301]

Government funding for regional tourist boards is made via grant in aid payments to the English Tourism Council. Funding for the North West Tourist Board between 1998–99 and 2001–02 is set out in the table.

Year

1998–991£337,993
1999–20001£329,607
2000–01£419,000
2001–02£413,100

1 Grant in aid paid to the English Tourist Board, predecessor to the English Tourism Council.

In addition to grant in aid payments, regional tourist boards receive direct funding from local authorities and through commercial activities.

Transport Heritage

asked Her Majesty's Government:What research they have undertaken or commissioned into transport heritage since June 1997. [HL3064]

Research into transport heritage is undertaken by those non-departmental public bodies responsible for either curating it, such as the Science Museum, or distributing funds for its conservation, such as the Heritage Lottery Fund. The Government have not directly commissioned research in this area. I am arranging for a list of relevant Science Museum research to be placed in the Libraries of both Houses. The full text of the Heritage Lottery Fund commissioned report on transport heritage cart be found on its website, www.hlf.org.uk.

Braithwaite Viaduct

asked Her Majesty's Government:Why they have awarded Grade II status to the Braithwaite Viaduct; and for what reasons they rejected representations from English Heritage that the viaduct should be given ancient monument status. [HL3266]

My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport announced her decision to list the Braithwaite Viaduct Grade II on 8 March. A copy of the letter to English Heritage stating the reasons for her decision has been placed in the Libraries of both Houses.

Bbc Governance In The Ofcom Age

asked Her Majesty's Government:What discussions they have held in 2002 with the Governors of the BBC on the issues raised by the publication of the BBC document

BBC Governance in the Ofcom Age; and what conclusions they have reached as a consequence of those discussions. [HL3267]

Gavyn Davies, Chairman of the BBC, outlined the reforms set out in the BBC document BBC Governance in the Ofcom Age when he met the Secretary of State on 11 February. My right honourable friend the Secretary of State has welcomed the changes as a very useful clarification and strengthening of the role of the BBC Governors, with the aim of allowing the board to concentrate more on its responsibility to ensure that the BBC serves the public interest.

National Gallery And National Portrait Gallery

asked Her Majesty's Government:How they will implement their recommendation at paragraph 2.12 of the stage two quinquennial review report National Gallery and National Portrait Gallery that officials of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport need the opportunity to engage directly with the chairmen and trustees of the galleries; and [HL3406]What action they propose to take as a consequence of their conclusion reached at paragraph 3.13 of the stage two quinquennial review report National Gallery and National Portrait Gallery that at the National Gallery there is a concern that the pressure to raise funds from nongovernmental sources is leading to a greater emphasis on the fund-raising ability of Trustees and that this may be to the detriment of other requirements at board level; and [HL3407]What action they propose to take in response to the conclusion reached at paragraph 3.74 of the stage two quinquennial review report National Gallery and National Portrait Gallery that the National Gallery believes that without an increase in grant-in-aid in real terms it will not be possible to expand its outreach and partnerships and may also have to reduce its services to the public; and [HL3408]What action they propose to take in respect to the conclusion reached at paragraph 4.13 of the stage two quinquennial review report National Gallery and National Portrait Gallery that the government increases in funding to the National Portrait Gallery have not matched the costs of initiatives such as

Summary of RAB administration and overhead costs as a percentage of expenditure
EABEMABLABNABNWABSABSEABABSWWMABYAB
1996–97
Total admin & overheads1,172,567907,9991,788,8261,153.4091,346,020987,085837,9201,062,3461,163,1081,098,290
Total expenditure5,672,0415,039,04314,864,1208,267,0169,667,5944,396,5633,386,6804,980,5926,468,1627,641,412
Admin & overheads as % of total expenditure21%18%12%14%14%22%25%,21%18%14%
1997–98
Total admin & overheads1,306,1921,022,9982,148,3601,191.1431,467,8661,152,5451,015,7941,076,8341,222,7271,232,622
Total expenditure5,921,2445,168,31914,872,4387,891,79411,219,2654,503,9993,615,5205,238,1976,822,6597,774,146
Admin & overheads as % of total expenditure22%20%14%15%13%26%28%21%18%16%
1998–99
Total admin & overheads1,356,8801,122,3041,967,7431,153,4091,548,1971,214,4851,133,4051,278,5641,277,3461,315,188
Total expenditure5,639,7745,365,20314,811,1188,267,01610,078,2395,079,6503,761,8615,297,0397,000,9278,021,625

extended opening hours and the opening of the Ondaatje Wing, and that the underlying level of grant-in-aid has not kept pace with inflation over the years; and [HL3409]

What are their plans to implement the proposal on page 49 of the stage two quinquennial review report National Gallery and National Portrait Gallery that the Department for Culture, Media and Sport could, in future, conducts a "conversation with a purpose" with all new trustees appointed by the Government so that they could be briefed on the role of the department. [HL3410]

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport, together with the two galleries, will prepare an implementation plan responding to each of the recommendations of the quinquennial review. Meanwhile DCMS:

  • (a) has put new arrangements in place for annual meetings between the chairmen and the DCMS Director of Museums, Libraries and Heritage;
  • (b) in consultation with the chairman, takes into account the skill requirements of the board of trustees when agreeing the role specification for each new appointment;
  • (c) considering how best to ensure that all new trustees are briefed properly on the role of the department; and
  • (d) is reviewing the financial requirements of its sponsored museums and galleries in the context of the current spending review;
  • (e) including the funding requirements of the National Gallery and the National Portrait Gallery.
  • Regional Arts Boards

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What were the annual budgets of the regional arts boards for the years 1997–2001 and the total spend by each board on administration costs as a percentage of their annual budget [HL3386]

    The following table, supplied by the Arts Council of England on behalf of the regional arts boards, contains the information requested by the noble Baroness.

    Summary of RAB administration and overhead costs as a percentage of expenditure

    EAB

    EMAB

    LAB

    NAB

    NWAB

    SAB

    SEAB

    ABSW

    WMAB

    YAB

    Admin & overheads as % of total expenditure24%21%13%14%,15%24%,30%24%,18%16%,

    1999–2000

    Total admin & overheads1,627,4481,674 6672,329,8401,304,9181,685,9401,447,1911,474,5301,843,8411,480,8371,464,843
    Total expenditure6,293,5727,006,54416,015,9169,405,89911,546,4415,819,4154,398,1276,183,1898,145,2668,814,294
    Admin & overheads as % of total expenditure26%24%15%14%15%25%34%30%18%17%

    2000–01

    Total admin & overheads2,028,8381,534,0753,214,9621,407,1152,071,8891,565,0381,642,9131,426,4841,637.7771,665,275
    Total expenditure9,690,1699,598,01931,498,33712,623,24018,643,25311,278,6927,210,1079,266,95113,766,02612,775,475
    Admin & overheads as % of total expenditure21%16%10%11%11%14%23%15%12%13%
    FTE staff35.542.069.037.053.039.042.037.045.045.0

    Notes:

    Total admin & overheads figure includes staffing costs, costs related to premises, office costs, travel & subsistence, company costs. Essentially anything which is not considered to be direct arts spend.

    All figures are taken from RAB audited accounts, with the exception of 2000–01 which are taken from RAB business plans.

    NB: RAB overheads include expenditure on arts development and fundraising which generates a net income.

    Death Penalty

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they intend to sign and ratify Protocol 13 to the European Convention on Human Rights banning the death penalty in all circumstances, including in times of war and imminent threat of war, when it is opened for signature on 3 May 2002. [HL2926]

    Her Majesty's Government will announce their position on Protocol 13 as soon as is reasonably possible.

    Zimbabwe

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many of the electorate in Zimbabwe were disenfranchised for the recent presidential election; and how this compares with previous elections; and [HL3310]What messages they have sent to Mr Robert Mugabe since Monday 11 March; and [HL3311]Whether they believe that the international observers of the Zimbabwean elections were impartial; and [HL3312]Whether they believe that the South African observers of the Zimbabwean elections carried out their duties fully and objectively; and [HL3313]Whether they have any evidence that the observers of the Zimbabwean elections were intimidated, attacked or otherwise prevented from either gaining access to places they wanted to visit or talking to people they wanted to interview. [HL3314]

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office,
    (Baroness Amos)

    Given the limited access afforded to international and other independent observers, it is difficult to estimate how many Zimbabweans were disenfranchised for the recent presidental election. However, the Commonwealth observer team concluded in its report that "thousands" were unable to vote as a result of inadequacies in the registration process.A number of observers, both local and international, were impeded by Zimbabwean authorities and partisan members of the Zimbabwean public from carrying out their duties. Despite this, many of the international observer teams (eg the Commonwealth, Southern African Development Community—Parliamentary Forum, Japanese and Norwegian) concluded that the election was not free and fair. This indicates a high degree of impartiality. We believe that a sufficient number oft he international teams' approach was impartial to give an accurate overall picture of the election process and outcome.We have not sent any message to Mr Mugabe since the Zimbabwean presidential election on 9–10 March. My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs told the House on 14 March that we did not accept that the election was free and fair and that the outcome did not reflect the will of the Zimbabwean people. The views of the Government on this issue have therefore been made very clear.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many observers monitored the recent presidential election in Zimbabwe; from what countries they came; and for how long they were in Zimbabwe. [HL3315]

    The total number of international observers for the presidential election in Zimbabwe on 9–10 March was 449, broken down as follows:

    • Commonwealth—62
    • Southern African Development Community (SADC) Parliamentary Forum—37
    • SADC Election Support Network—54
    • SADC Election Commission's Forum—26
    • Electoral Institute of Southern Africa—42
    • African, Caribbean and Pacific countries—5
    • Organisation of African Unity—26
    • South Africa—59
    • South African Parliamentarians—20
    • Japan—5
    • Nigeria—16
    • United States—18
    • Canada—8
    • Norway—26
    • Tanzania—20
    • Mozambique—7
    • Malawi—8
    • Botswana—10
    The observer teams deployed in phases during the run-up to the election and we do not know exactly how long each team stayed in Zimbabwe.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What steps they propose to take to have Mr Robert Mugabe condemned by the United Nations Commission on Human Rights. [HL3360]

    With UK Government support, the EU intends to express its serious concern at the human rights situation in Zimbabwe at the UN Commission on Human Rights, now under way in Geneva.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they can confirm that a deal has been agreed by a number of countries in Africa, including South Africa, that Mr Robert Mugabe should be allowed to win the recent election with a view to retiring "with dignity" within a year. [HL3361]

    Prison Population

    asked Her Majesty's Government: What was:

  • (a) the total United Kingdom prison population;
  • (b) the number of prisoners aged under 18;
  • (c) the number of prisoners aged under 21; and
  • (d) the number of prisoners aged under 25; on the most recent convenient date, broken down between sentenced prisoners and remand prisoners. [HL2895]
  • The data for England and Wales and Northern Ireland are set out in the table. The Scottish Executive should be approached for data on Scottish prisons where it is a devolved matter.

    Prison population England and Wales on 28 February 2002

    Remand

    Sentenced

    Non-criminal

    Fine defaulter

    Total

    Male11,67953,2966754565,695
    Female9123,1924534,152
    Total12,59156,4887204869,847

    Male

    Under 184931,851112,346
    18 to 201,8525,9552427,833
    21 to 252,89111,8031441114,849
    Total under 255,23619,6091691425,028

    Female

    Under 18159000105
    18 to 2013032440458
    21 to 25247746811,002
    Total under 253921,1601211,565

    Total prison population in Northern Ireland on 31 January 2002

    Remand

    Sentenced

    Non-criminal

    Fine defaulter

    Total

    Male279619329930
    Female10101122
    Total289629430952

    Male

    Under 1813100124
    18 to 20466004110
    21 to <25489918156
    Total under 25107169113290

    Female

    Under 1800000
    18 to 2011002
    21 to <2520002
    Total under 2531004

    Homicide

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many people have died since 1963 in England and Wales at the hands of persons previously convicted of homicide. [HL3172]

    During the period 1963 to date, a total of 104 persons in England and Wales are known to have been killed by persons who had been previously convicted of homicide in England and Wales.As with previous Answers, the figure excludes persons who have been killed by those who may have been convicted outside England and Wales (for whom there is incomplete information) and persons who have been killed by those not previously convicted of homicide by reason of their mental state.

    Badgers: Offences Against Wild Animals

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether offences against wild animals, and especially those involving the baiting and abuse of badgers, are classed as notifiable offences; and, if not, whether such a classification could be established without delay. [HL3213]

    The Protection of Badgers Act 1992 provides the required statutory protection for badgers. The Act makes it an offence to cruelly kill, injure or take a badger or to attempt to do so, or to wilfully ill-treat a badger, or, intentionally or recklessly, to interfere with a badger sett by damaging it or any part of it.These offences are recordable on the Police National Computer, although they are not notifiable to the Home Office for the purposes of the recorded crime statistics. These statistics are restricted to offences which are indictable or triable either way and a few closely associated summary offences. Although these arrangements may be changed without legislation, we do not consider that the additional

    Body conducting reviewPurposeDate reportedBody receiving report
    Deloitte ToucheMonitor and report on the efficiency and effectiveness with which the new asylum support arrangements are being implemented and operated; make recommendations for improvement where necessaryOctober 2000NASS management
    INEX ConsultingDetermine where workflow and document management techniques could bring benefits. Possibly propose changes to the current processes (though s/he) should be aware of restrictions which legal and audit requirements, such as the separation of duties, place upon the possible alternativesFebruary 2001NASS management
    Audit and Assurance Unit of the Home OfficeProcedures for asylum seekers support arrangementsJanuary 2001Departmental Accounting Officer
    Audit and Assurance Unit of the Home OfficePayments by NASS for accommodation used to house asylum seekersSeptember 2001Departmental Accounting Officer
    Audit and Assurance Unit of the Home OfficeImmigration Nationality Directorate (IND) payments—asylum seekers support new arrangementsOctober 2001Departmental Accounting Officer
    Audit and Assurance Unit of Home OfficeCessation of support by NASSJanuary 2002Departmental Accounting Officer
    Audit and Assurance Unit of the Home OfficeNASS arrivalsDepartmental Accounting Officer
    NASSReview of operation of the voucher schemeOctober 2001Home Office Ministers
    NASSReview of operation of dispersalOctober 2001Home Office Ministers

    Drugs: Prison Sentences For Importation

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many men and how many women are currently in prison following convictions for illegally importing drugs; and what is the average length of sentence in both cases. [HL3234]

    The number of men and women who were serving sentences for illegal importation/exportation of drugs on 31 January 2002:

    Prisoners serving sentences for illegal import/export of drugsNumber of prisonersAverage sentenced length imposed (years)
    Men2,4008.1
    Women7506.4
    All prisoners serving sentences for illegal import/export of drugs3,1507.7

    Computer Crime

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the Computer Misuse Act 1990 is appropriately drafted to deal with current trends in computer crime. [HL3295]

    workload on the police which would be entailed by a requirement to notify summary offences would be justified.

    National Asylum Support Service

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What internal and external inquiries have taken place into the purpose, organisation, efficiency, effectiveness and success in meeting the objectives and targets of the National Asylum Support Service since 1 April 2000; when they reported; and to whom. [HL3220]

    The Government are considering whether changes are needed to the Computer Misuse Act 1990 in the light of the United Kingdom's obligations as a signatory state to the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime.

    Prisoners On Remand

  • (a) have children;
  • (b) have step-children;
  • (c) have siblings under age 18;
  • (d) are married;
  • (e) are co-habitees; and
  • (f) are single. [HL3333]
  • On 31 January 2002 there were 12,270 prisoners on remand, 11,382 males and 888 females. Data on prisoners' families and marital status are not held centrally.

    Offender Programmes In Prisons: Faith Organisations

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will restate their policy on the involvement of faith organisations in offender programmes in HM prisons. [HL3334]

    Offender programmes in prisons, including those involving faith organisations, will be considered on their merits in line with the What Works principles. What Works principles are based upon the best available evidence of what works in reducing re-offending.

    Criminal Records Bureau

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the Criminal Records Bureau intends to publish its corporate and business plan 2002 to 2007. [HL3503]

    The Criminal Records Bureau corporate and business plan has been published today. Copies of the plan have been placed in the Library.

    Passport Service

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the United Kingdom Passport Service intends to publish its corporate and business plan 2002 to 2007. [HL3504]

    The United Kingdom Passport Service corporate and business plan has been published today. Copies of the plan have been placed in the Library.

    Babies Born With Birth Defects

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What efforts have been made to ensure that the Office for National Statistics complies accurate figures on the number of babies born with birth defects [HL3457]

    The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician, who has been asked to reply.

    Letter from the National Statistician, Len Cook, dated March 2002.

    As National Statistician I have been asked to reply to your recent question on what efforts have been made to ensure the compilation of accurate figures on the number of babies born with birth defects. [HL3457]

    The Office for National Statistics (ONS) collects information on live born babies and stillbirths with congenital anomalies through the National Congenital Anomaly System (NCAS). This system has been monitoring congenital anomalies in England and Wales since 1964. Its primary purpose is to detect changes in the frequency of reporting of congenital anomalies rather than to estimate exact prevalence at birth.

    Reporting to NCAS is voluntary, and it has long been recognised that there is under-notification. A review in 1995 recommended that where good congenital anomaly registers existed outside ONS, information should be exchanged with these to improve the completeness and validity of both local and national data. ONS began data exchange in 1998 and now receives high quality data from Wales and three English regions where there are local registers. These registers obtain details of cases from a wide variety of sources before sending the notifications on to ONS. These registers cover all births in Wales and 23 per cent of births in England. Reports for the remainder of England are sent directly to ONS by NHS Trusts.

    In January 2002 two further local registers began providing information to NCAS. ONS is also currently working with national condition-specific registers where these exist, to improve notification levels. These improvements in the notification system have increased the numbers of babies with congenital anomalies reported. The recent increases in National Statistics' numbers of congenital anomaly notifications have all coincided with the timing and location of these improvements.

    Government Debt And Asset Management

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What are the future organisational arrangements for government debt and asset management. [HL3505]

    Following a detailed review of the current arrangements and future requirements for government debt and asset management, the National Debt Office (NDO) and the Public Works Loans Board (PWLB) will be integrated with the UK Debt Management Office (DMO) with effect from 1 July. Both the NDO and the PWLB are part of the National Investment and Loans Office (NILO) and the relevant staff will be relocated to the DMO's offices. This reorganisation, while maintaining provision of existing services, is designed to deliver improved management of the central government balance sheet and to offer a more robust, flexible and innovative service to public sector clients.At the same time the remaining part of NILO, the Office of HM Paymaster General (OPG), will be merged with the Treasury, while also maintaining the provision of its existing services. NILO will thereafter cease to exist.

    Occupational Pension Schemes: Preston Judgment

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What will be the treatment of tax settlements between employers and employees following the Preston judgment. [HL3506]

    The Preston judgment means that many employers must give all their part-time employees and certain of their ex-employees, retrospective access to membership of their occupational pension schemes from April 1976 or in some cases later. The employers concerned have a responsibility to settle with their employees and ex-employees how this should be achieved in each case. There are outstanding cases before employment tribunals which are designed to determine how employers and employees should meet their liabilities.Where employees are entitled to membership rights in an occupational scheme in respect of past periods of employment, the normal rules about tax relief on contributions continue to apply. That is: all employers' contributions to occupational pension schemes, including any for past service, qualify for corporation tax relief; employees' contributions up to 15 per cent of their salary from the employer concerned in the year the contributions are paid qualify for income tax relief, irrespective of whether any part of the contribution is in respect of previous years' service; employees may make contributions to their schemes above 15 per cent of salary in any tax year but any such contributions do not benefit from tax relief.In some cases, employers and employees may prefer to agree on lump sum settlements rather than additional membership rights in occupational schemes. In these cases, the lump sums are not taxable as income under Schedule E but will be liable to capital gains tax subject to the normal annual exemption.

    Tax Law Rewrite Project

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What further developments there have been as a result of the Tax Law Rewrite Project. [HL3507]

    The Tax Law Rewrite Project continues to make good progress. At the end of this month it will be publishing its thirteenth Exposure Draft, containing draft clauses on foreign income and property income.The project is also currently working on an income tax Bill rewriting the provisions on employment income, pension income and taxable social security benefits. In preparation for that Bill, this year's finance Bill will include some small amendments to the tax legislation on employment income. Copies of this draft finance Bill legislation will shortly be published on the project's website.

    Copies of the exposure draft and the draft finance Bill legislation will be placed in the Library as soon as they are available.

    Strategic Defence Review

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What responses they have received to the public discussion paper

    The Strategic Defence Review, A New Chapter, on which views were invited by 15 March. [HL3346]

    The Ministry of Defence received over 200 responses by 15 March to its public discussion paper, The Strategic Defence Review: A New Chapter. The responses cover a wide range of issues and are from a wide range of correspondents, including parliamantarians local authorities, nongovernmental organisations, academics, members of the public and MoD personnel. All responses are being given full consideration in the continuing SDR New Chapter work.

    Armed Forces Memorial

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What progress has been made to the proposed siting of the new national Armed Forces memorial to service personnel killed since the Second World War. [HL3364]

    A project team was appointed early last year to look at potential sites for the memorial and to consider the qualifying criteria for those to be commemorated. Extensive research was carried out on suitable sites both in and outside London. There has been wide consultation with the service and ex-service organisations on both the siting and eligibility criteria. There is general support for the proposals.We are delighted to be able to confirm that the Armed Forces memorial will be sited at the National Memorial Arboretum in Staffordshire. The names of those commemorated will either be engraved on the memorial or in rolls of honour that will be kept close by in the Millennium Chapel at the arboretum. The design of the memorial will be decided following an architectural competition that will be held later this year.The qualifying criteria for inclusion on the memorial are:"All those Service personnel who were killed on duty whilst performing functions attributable to the special circumstances and requirements of the Armed Forces, or as a result of terrorist attack, and all those who died whilst deployed on designated operations.""Those members of the Royal Fleet Auxiliary and the Merchant Navy who were killed in conflict zones while in direct support of the Armed Forces will also be included on the memorial."An additional part of the project will be to erect a memorial plaque in the Cloisters of Westminster Abbey to those members of the Armed Forces killed in conflict since the end of the Second World War. Finally, there will be rolls of honour recording the names of all members of the Royal Navy and the Army who have died in service during this period. These will be kept in suitable churches in London and will be similar to those for the Royal Air Force that are kept in the Church of St Clement Danes.Trustees of the Armed Forces memorial trust will now be appointed to take this project forward. They will take on the ownership of the memorial and will be responsible for its funding and construction. Funds will be raised by public subscription.This is a very important national project that will also provide a platform to help educate our younger generations about the value of our Armed Forces.

    Osce Parliamentary Assembly, 21 And 22 February

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What were the main issues discussed by the Organisation for the Security and Co-operation in Europe Parliamentary Assembly held in Vienna from 21 to 22 February. [HL2965]

    The United Kingdom was represented at the meeting by a delegation of parliamentarians led by my right honourable friend the Member for Walsall South, with my noble friends Lady Hilton of Eggardon and Lord Ponsonby of' Shulbrede representing the House of Lords. They were briefed on current issues, including budgetary matters, by the chair in office, Foreign Minister Gama and Secretary General Jan Kubis. The three general committees also discussed reports relating to the upcoming annual session in Berlin.

    Irish Government: Discussions

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What topics the Irish Government have discussed with them since 1 January 2000. [HL3167]

    The Government of Ireland have very frequent discussions with Her Majesty's Government. These discussions occur routinely at all levels, include official and ministerial discussions and take place both in international fora (such as the UN and the EU) and bilaterally. The discussions cover a wide range of issues in both domestic and foreign policy.

    Eu Council Meetings: Scrutiny Arrangement

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean on 7 February (

    WA 112), at what stage in the preparation of agendas of European Council meetings are the scrutiny committees of both Houses of Parliament apprised of each item of business; and whether, in respect of framework decisions, clearance by Her Majesty's Government is given, or withheld, at the stage of the framework agreement or at the time of the specific proposals for its implementation. [HL3195]

    There is no formal agenda for European Council meetings. However, the committees are informed three weeks before a Council of Ministers meeting of items expected to appear on the agenda. As soon as the agenda becomes clearer, departments provide a detailed assessment to the committees of the main agenda items.As with all other EU legislation, Framework Directives Decisions and any subsequent secondary legislation are provided to the scrutiny committees in line with agreed guidance.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean on 7 February (

    WA 112) concerning matters on the agenda of formal meetings of the European Council, what is their practice in respect of parliamentary scrutiny of proposals which have not so far been scrutinised by any such procedures and which are given political approval for subsequent detailed negotiation or legislative or executive implementation. [HL3196]

    The Government have given Parliament an undertaking that Ministers will not agree to proposals in the Council of Ministers unless scrutiny has been completed. In exceptional circumstances, e.g. where the national interest would be damaged by delaying agreement, the Minister responsible will write to the scrutiny committees explaining the special reasons for which scrutiny was overridden.

    Cyprus

    asked Her Majesty's Government:As guarantor power, what representations have they made to the Cyprus Government following their decision to take delivery to southern Cyprus of military helicopters from Russia; and whether this delivery of military equipment will facilitate the present talks between the leaders of the Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot communities. [HL3228]

    The Government have consistently made it clear to all parties in Cyprus that they deplore weapons acquisition, in line with UN Security Council resolutions which express concern about military build-up on the island. We do not consider such procurement to be conducive to efforts aimed at securing a just and lasting settlement in Cyprus. We have raised the issue with the Republic of Cyprus at the highest level. We have also raised the matter with EU partners.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:When they gave assurances to the Greek Cypriot leader, Glafcos Clerides, that the present phase of direct talks between the two Cypriot community leaders would be held within the framework of United Nations Security Council resolutions. [HL3229]

    The UK has always believed that the UN settlement process, based upon UNSCR 1250, offers the best chance of achieving a just and lasting settlement in Cyprus which respects the vital interests of all concerned. Accordingly, we welcomed the decision by the two leaders in December 2001 to begin direct talks on-island in January under the auspices of the UN We support this process and continue to urge all involved to engage in the talks in a positive and constructive manner.

    Belize And Guatemala

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether there have been any recent negotiations between Belize and Guatemala to resolve their territorial dispute. [HL3398]

    The Governments of Belize and Guatemala are working closely under the auspices of the Organisation of American States (OAS) to negotiate a settlement to their longstanding territorial dispute. Two facilitators appointed by Belize and Guatemala aim to present recommendations for an agreed settlement to both governments shortly.We firmly support the OAS-facilitated process. We very much hope that Belize and Guatemala will be able to agree a settlement this year. Such an agreement would have great significance for both countries and the region more widely. We are in close touch with both countries and are actively helping the facilitators to secure a final and lasting settlement to the dispute.

    Zimbabwe:Suspension

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What recent developments there have been in relation to the suspension of Zimbabwe from the Councils of the Commonwealth. [HL3440]

    I refer my noble friend to the statement I made to the House on 21 March.

    Sound Recording: Copyright Exception

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord Sainsbury of Turville on 12 March (

    WA 74), who are the "key interests" with whom the Government are continuing to have dialogue with regard to the possible repeal of the exception to copyright in Section 72 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. [HL3349]

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Trade and Industry
    (Lord Sainsbury of Turville)

    There is an ongoing dialogue with the representatives of right holders who favour a repeal of Section 72. It will be important to engage with those who would have to pay a public performance royalty as a result of any change to Section 72 before any decisions are taken.

    Consumer Safety

    asked Her Majesty's Government:On what date in 2003 they expect to publish the next statutory report on consumer safety; and whether meanwhile they can provide any provisional estimates of the number of prosecutions and convictions under the Furniture and Furnishings (Fire) (Safety) Regulations 1998 for the years 1999, 2000 and 2001. [HL3356]

    The next statutory report on consumer safety will cover the period from I April 1998 to 31 March 2003 and will, be published as soon as practicable after the end of that period. The department only collates statistics on safety enforcement at the end of each five-year period, so cannot provide the estimates requested.

    Genetically Modified Crops

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether genetically modified crop trials are being evaluated to establish any benefits to biodiversity in replacing damaging practices in conventional agricultural by planting certain genetically modified crops. [HL2994]

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
    (Lord Whitty)

    The farm scale evaluations are primarily assessing the impact on farmland wildlife of the management of four genetically modified crops (winter and spring oil seed rape, fodder maize and sugar beet) relative to the equivalent conventional (non-GM) crops.

    The farms selected for the evaluations include a wide range of conventional agricultural practices, from intensive to extensive. The research programme should therefore also reveal the impact of conventional practices on biodiversity and contribute to our understanding of the relationships between farming practice and wildlife abundance generally.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether, in considering safe separation distances for genetically modified crop growth, they have taken into account potential effects on private gardens and allotments. [HL2995]

    The separation distances are set to limit the interaction between genetically modified (GM) crop plants and other plants. The distances set for any particular trial take full account of the potential effects on private gardens and allotments.The GM crops being grown in the farm scale evaluations, oil and seed rape, fodder beet, sugar beet and forage maize, are not grown in gardens and allotments. The forage maize could potentially cross pollinate with sweetcorn varieties of maize, so a separation distance of 200 metres has been specified between GM maize and sweetcorn. The Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment has advised that at this distance the incidence of cross-pollination should be less than 0·5 per cent.

    Livestock Movement Restrictions: Agricultural Shows

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the rules regulating the movement of livestock will in practice prevent agricultural shows having cattle and sheep classes this summer. [HL3045]

    Cattle are allowed to move to and from agricultural shows under the interim movements arrangements and we expect cattle will be shown. Subject to veterinary advice, we hope it will be possible to allow sheep and goats to go to shows from around the end of May.

    Imported Plant And Animal Material

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What steps they are taking to protect imported plant and animal material, including "organic" material, at ports of entry in order to control pests and other undesirable organisms. [HL3272]

    All consignments of products of animal origin currently imported from third countries into the UK are subjected to a documentary check of the veterinary certification and an identity check to match the goods to the certification. A percentage of consignments are also subjected to a physical check, which may include organoleptic checks, temperature checks and laboratory tests for pathogens or contaminants. Where import checks reveal that any product of animal origin does not comply with Community import conditions, it is re-exported or destroyed.Defra's plant health and seeds inspectors aim to inspect all commercial imports of plants from non-EU countries and a proportion, according to risk, of imported consignments of fruit, vegetables and cut flowers, including "organic" produce. These inspections take place at ports of entry and at suitable sites inland. Plants and plant produce of EU origin, including "organic" produce, are inspected at distribution points and nurseries. Appropriate action is taken when pests and diseases are found which pose a risk to plant health, regardless of whether the produce is "organic". Measures may include destruction, re-export or treatment. Interceptions are notified to the exporting country. Further information is available on the plant health pages of the department's website (http://defraweb/planth/ph.htm).

    Organophosphates

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether, in the light of the results of the research conducted by Cherry N.

    et al at the University of Manchester showing a genetic susceptibility to health damage resulting from exposure to organophosphates in some individuals, they propose to offer any advice, diagnostic tests, biological monitoring or other practical assistance to users of these chemicals. [HL3343]

    The Government are gauging the significance of these findings in consultation with their independent expert advisory committees, the Advisory Committee on Pesticides and the Veterinary Products Committee.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:For what period the organophosphate cruformate was licensed for use as a warble fly dressing in the United Kingdom; and what are the known mutagenic, teratrogenic and neurological effects of its use on cattle. [HL3345]

    Crufomate was used as an active ingredient in veterinary medicinal products for the treatment of warble fly from the 1950s onwards. This predates the introduction of the current controls under the Medicines Act 1968 and so our information on such products is very limited. With the entry into force of the Medicines Act in 1970 these products would have been issued with licences of right that permitted their continued marketing pending a formal review of their safety, quality and efficacy.

    Evidence from the marketing authorisation holders indicates that these products were removed from the market prior to 1978. They would not therefore have been included within the formal review of all pharmaceutical products that began in the mid-1980s.

    Consequently no data on possible mutagenic, teratogenic or neurological effects of the use of crufomate on cattle were collected as part of their authorisation for marketing as veterinary medicinal products.

    Trade: Foot And Mouth Disease

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What are the figures for the total tonnage of British meat exported (a) before the foot and mouth disease epidemic, and (b) as at 15 March and; [HL3369]What are the figures for the total tonnage of imported meat (a) before the foot and mouth disease epidemic and (b) as at 15 March; and for each category what percentage of meat depended or depends on vaccination for its good health. [HL3370]

    The attached table shows the monthly volume of UK trade in meat and meat preparations between January 2000 and December 2001. The monthly data for February cannot be split before and after the FMD outbreak. Monthly data are provided so that normal seasonal patterns of trade can be taken into account and to show the effects of the gradual lifting of the export ban.The importation of meat is permitted from a limited number of third countries where foot and mouth disease is present and where the veterinary authorities have contained the disease in specified regions. European Community rules permit imports from certain regions of those countries that are not considered to pose a risk to human or animal health. Fully matured boneless beef, which does not post a FMD risk, may in some cases be imported from other regions subject to veterinary certification. Countries to which these controls currently apply are Botswana, Namibia, South Africa, Swaziland, Zimbabwe, Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay. All meat imported from third countries is subject to veterinary checks at border inspection posts to ensure that import requirements are met.The importation into the EU of meat from vaccinated animals is not permitted from African countries. Imports of meat from Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and Paraguay may be from vaccinated animals, but the meat must be deboned and matured so as to remove any risk of live FMD virus being present. No record is kept on whether the meat imported from these countries is derived from vaccinated or unvaccinated animals.

    UK trade in meat and meat preparations 2000–01

    ('000 tonnes)

    Trade Type

    Product

    Month

    2000

    2001

    Exports

    BeefJanuary11
    February11
    March11
    April11
    May11
    June11
    July10
    August11
    September11
    October11
    November11
    December11
    Beef total98
    SheepmeatJanuary910
    February76
    March80
    April70
    May50
    June71
    July82
    August102
    September92
    October92
    November102
    December114
    Sheepmeat total10031
    PigmeatJanuary1916
    February2413
    March251
    April211
    May232
    June242
    July213
    August233
    September203
    October193
    November196
    December175
    Pigmeat total25457
    PoultrymeatJanuary1519
    February1619
    March2119
    April1418
    May1619
    June1818
    July1620
    August1720
    September1819
    October1922
    November2021
    December2020
    Poultrymeat total209236
    OtherJanuary11
    February00
    March00
    April00
    May00
    June01
    July00
    August00
    September00
    October01
    November10
    December11
    Other total65
    Exports total578336

    UK trade in meat and meat preparations 2000–01

    ('000 tonnes)

    Trade Type

    Product

    Month

    2000

    2001

    Imports

    BeefJanuary1924
    February1921
    March2030
    April2024
    May2425
    June2624
    July2221
    August2326
    September2122
    October1925
    November2124
    December2126
    Bovine total257292
    SheepmeatJanuary98
    February109
    March1415
    April1212
    May1111
    June108
    July88
    August97
    September89
    October96
    November95
    December138
    Sheepmeat total121106
    PigmeatJanuary4152
    February4347
    March5563
    April4233
    May4743
    June5250
    July4845
    August5047
    September5949
    October4852
    November5054
    December5351
    Pigmeat total587586
    PoultrymeatJanuary3032
    February3331
    March3535
    April3128
    May3430
    June3832
    July3131
    August3233
    September3230
    October3035
    November3435
    December3332
    Poultrymeat total393384
    OtherJanuary47
    February168
    March138
    April57
    May69
    June610
    July78
    August69
    September69
    October510
    November813
    December712
    Other total90110
    Imports total1,4491,479

    Pest And Disease Control

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What percentage of the total agricultural research budget for 2000–01 was spent on investigating methods of pest and disease control which do not involve the use of chemical pesticides. [HL3382]

    In 2000–01, Defra spent £8.4 million on research into methods of pest and disease control which do not involve the use of chemical pesticides.Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) spent approximately £3.9 million on research directly into alternatives to chemical pesticides. Together this represents nearly 7 per cent of the agricultural research budget.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many research projects over the last five years which were in receipt of public funds involved research into alternatives to the use of organophosphate and carbamate pesticides; and whether they will give the names of the research institutions involved and the value of each contract. [HL3383]

    During the last five years, Defra has funded 113 projects which have involved research into alternatives to the use of organophosphate and carbamate pesticides and BBSRC has funded 14. Many of these projects, including LINK projects funded jointly with industry, have been developing methods of integrated pest management to reduce dependence on pesticides.The main research institutions involved were Horticulture Research International (total value of contracts £21 million); Institute of Arable Crops Research (£17 million); Central Science Laboratory (£13 million) and ADAS (£2 million). The total value of all 127 contracts was £57 million, giving an average contract value of about £0.45 million.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What procedure is followed when they receive a request to extend the approval for use of a pesticide beyond its intended revocation date; and what are the criteria by which the Government decide whether or not to grant such an extension of approval. [HL3384]

    Pesticide approvals may be revoked for a variety of different reasons. The most important would be the identification of safety concerns but often include an approval holder's failure to meet data submission deadlines or the withdrawal of the product by the company for commercial reasons. Provided the approval is extant at the time the request is made, an extension can be considered. There are no set procedures when considering an extension beyond the intended revocation date. Each request is considered on its merits, taking into consideration the reason for the original revocation decison and, where applicable, whether any data requirements should be met before granting any extension.

    National Forest Company

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether a conclusion has been reached on the review of' the National Forest Company. [HL3470]

    The quinquennial review of the National Forest Company has been completed. It has concluded that the company, a non-departmental public body sponsored by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, should continue to be responsible for delivering the National Forest Strategy which is contributing strongly to the Government's sustainable development agenda. Since its creation in 1995, the company has, for example, achieved an expansion of woodland cover in the national forest area, covering 200 square miles in Derbyshire, Leicestershire and Staffordshire, from 6 per cent to 12 per cent. Detailed changes to the company's operations will be made in order to maximise effective delivery and value for money. A full report of the review is available at www.defra.gov.uk.

    Education Bill

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What would be the status of compulsory subjects such as the core curriculum, religious education and daily worship, and citizenship, if proposals were to come forward under Clause 2 of the Education Bill linking the dropping of subjects with the raising of standards. [HL3317]

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Education and Skills
    (Baroness Ashton of Upholland)

    Exemptions under Clause 2 of the Education Bill may be conferred for a temporary period only, and only for the purposes set out in Clause 1. That is, exemptions may be conferred only "to facilitate the implementation by qualifying bodies of innovative projects that may—(a) in the opinion of the Secretary of State contribute to the raising of the educational standards achieved by children in England, or (b) in the opinion of the National Assembly for Wales contribute to the raising of educational standards achieved by children in Wales". The Secretary of State would have to approve any such proposals, and would do so only if she were convinced it would lead to higher educational standards.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What would be the liability of governors, head teachers and other partners if a company, set up under Chapter Three of the Education Bill, were to fail; and who would be responsible for assessing risk. [HL3318]

    In the event of a school company failing financially, we would expect the liability of each company member to be limited to a nominal sum. In the case of a company limited by guarantee, this would be the nominal guarantee figure of perhaps £10. In the case of a company limited by shares, this would be any amount outstanding on the shares, which we would anticipate to be a nominal sum. For member schools, the liability would not rest with individual governors or the head teacher. We expect joint venture companies to operate under the same principles as school companies.Other partners could include other company members whose liability would be limited in the same way as school company members. The situation of LEAs would differ depending upon the type of company. Just as schools spend their delegated budgets as agents of the LEA, so a purchasing company, when spending those delegated budgets, would also be acting as an agent of the LEA. This would not be the case for service provider companies, who would be spending income from contracts.It would be up to a school governing body to assess operational risks before deciding whether or not to join a school company.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:In the light of the Education Bill, which Criminal Justice Act would require amendment in order to extend parenting orders. [HL3319]

    The powers relating to parenting orders are contained at Section 8 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. That is the Act that would require amendment in order to extend these powers.

    Vocational Gcses

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the estimated cost of introducing the new vocational GCSEs, including materials, equipment and the recruitment and training of appropriately qualified staff. [HL3351]

    The department has funded an extensive programme of training and support for schools and colleges to support the expansion of vocational opportunities at Key Stage 4. Among other things, this will cover the introduction of the new GCSEs in September 2002. The cost will be £2.7 million in 2001–02 and the programme will be extended in 2002–03. In addition, a general programme with funding of £38 million will be made available in 2002–04. Aimed at increasing work related learning opportunities, it will also support the roll-out of the new GCSEs at Key Stage 4.

    Classroom Assistants

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will clarify the distinction between a classroom assistant employed under current arrangements and a classroom assistant as envisaged under Clause 129 of the Education Bill. [HL3354]

    A classroom assistant as envisaged under Clause 129 of the Education Bill will be required to work under a framework set by a qualified teacher when work of a teaching nature is undertaken. In comparison with present arrangements, this will add a clear assurance that adequate supervision is in place.

    Education Bill: Applications To Innovate

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Under the Education Bill, how many additional staff will be required to assess all applications to innovate under Chapter 2 and also to assess all applications under Chapter 3. [HL3355]

    Chapters 2 and 3 in the Education Bill refer to earned autonomy and powers to form companies.We intend to consult widely on which flexibilities under Chapter 2 will be available as of right and which on a discretionary basis before regulations are laid. Until consultations have been completed, it is not possible to say precisely how many additional staff will be required, but the intention is to design procedures to minimise bureaucracy and extra staff and enable as many flexibilities as possible to be made available automatically.Under Chapter 3, the relevant LEA has a role in determining whether or not schools may form or join school companies. However, the LEA may only refuse schools permission to join in limited circumstances, to be set out in regulations. We therefore do not expect this task to be an onerous one and so do not expect there to be a need for LEAs to employ additional staff.

    Martin Sixsmith

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the Strategic Communications Unit, or any of its members, was involved in any media briefings concerned with the resignation of Mr Martin Sixsmith from his post in the Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions. [HL3037]

    The Minister for the Cabinet Office and Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
    (Lord Macdonald of Tradeston)

    No.

    Northern Ireland Police Ombudsman

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they have received representations from the Government of the Irish Republic supporting the Northern Ireland Police Ombudsman; what was the nature of these representations; by whom were they made; and what was the response. [HL3002]

    No formal representations have been received from the Government of the Irish Republic supporting the Police Ombudsman.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What arrangements they are making to train the Northern Ireland Police Ombudsman and her staff in the skills required to write clear, concise and consistent reports. [HL3100]

    The arrangements for the training of staff in the Northern Ireland Police Ombudsman's office are entirely a matter for that office.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the annual budget for the office of the Northern Ireland Police Ombudsman. [HL3101]

    The annual budget for the office of the Northern Ireland Police Ombudsman for financial year 2001–02 is £5,815K.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What redress members of the police in Northern Ireland should have when accused of offences by the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland and which subsequently prove to be incorrect. [HL3168]

    The police ombudsman does not have the power to accuse police officers of committing offences. The decision as to the substance of a case investigated by the police ombudsman is for the Director of Public Prosecutions to decide. Common law provides for civil action to be taken by those who believe they have been wrongly prosecuted.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the office of the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland can be cited in libel actions. [HL3169]

    The police ombudsman can be cited in libel actions. However in relation to defamatory material published in the course of her duties, the police ombudsman has the benefit of qualified privilege, which means that any action against her would only succeed if malice could be proved.

    Northern Ireland: Appointments

    asked Her Majesty's Government:In which areas of public appointment in Northern Ireland the Government of the Irish Republic is consulted. [HL3103]

    I refer the noble Lord to Lord Falconer of Thoroton's Answer of 30 November 2000 (Official Report, col. WA 161).

    Northern Ireland: Policing

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many people were on the establishment of the Royal Ulster Constabulary and on the Police Service of Northern Ireland on 1 January from each year from 1994 to date. [HL3165]

    The manpower figures for the Royal Ulster Constabulary and the Police Service of Northern Ireland on 1 January of each year from 1994 to date are as follows:

    YearRegular StrengthFull-time Reserve StrengthPart-time Reserve Strength
    19948,4693,1841,388
    19958,4993,1991,488
    19968,4243,1011,582
    19978,4302,9291,473
    19988,4952,9821,323
    19998,4652,9361,235
    20008,5212,7181,170
    20018,3492,5511,095
    200217,1262,2371,021
    1 Figures for 2002 do not include trainees.

    Omagh Bombing

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they have made representations to the Government of the Irish Republic to seek an independent inquiry into the police investigation of the Omagh bomb of 1998: and, if not, why not. [HL3292]

    The Government have made no representations to the Government of Ireland to seek an independent inquiry into the police investigation of the Omagh bomb in 1998. The Government are satisfied that the Government of Ireland and an Garda Siochána wholeheartedly share our objective of bringing to justice the perpetrators of this terrible atrocity.

    Northern Ireland: Education

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the total number of separate pieces of legislation relating to education at secondary and primary level in Northern Ireland passed by Parliament from 1989 until education became a devolved matter. [HL3367]

    There have been five major pieces of such legislation. Information on the more minor legislation is not available in the form requested.

    Wales Office: Staffing

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What has been the increase in staffing numbers at the Wales Office, including the National Assembly for Wales, since the dissolution of the Welsh Office; and what has been the increase in staffing costs in cash and constant terms over the same period. [HL2799]

    Since devolution on 1 July 1999 and the establishment of the National Assembly for Wales and the Wales Office, staffing for the Wales Office has increased from 38 to 441. The increase in staffing costs has been £406,000 in cash terms and £389,000 in constant terms (as measured by the GDP deflator at market prices)2.Equivalent figures for the National Assembly for Wales are a matter for the Welsh Assembly Government.

    1 The figures are shown on a staff-year basis and include the number of special advisers and overtime calculated on a staff year full-time equivalent. The figure for 1999–2000 has been calculated pro rata because the Wales Office was in existence only for three-quarters of that year (1 July 1999 to 31 March 2000). The figure for this year so far has also been calculated pro rata.

    2 The figures for this year so far include the costs up to and including February 2002 and are calculated pro rata.