Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 638: debated on Tuesday 23 July 2002

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

Tuesday, 23rd July 2002.

Nepad

asked Her Majesty's Government:What new resources they intend to commit to the New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) agreed at the G8 Summit in Kananaskis. [HL5110]

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office
(Baroness Amos)

Over the course of the last year, a number of African leaders have been working together to draw up the New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) which seeks to put in place the policies necessary in Africa for sustainable development. In response to this initiative, G8 leaders prepared an Africa Action Plan, which was finalised at the G8 Summit in Kananaskis.The G8 plan includes a commitment that half or more of the new development funds announced at Monterrey (ie 6 billion dollars) could be used in African countries, but only if they put the NEPAD principles into practice and create the right policy environment.NEPAD itself is not a funding mechanism, and is not envisaged as a body that will implement projects. It is not therefore something that the UK will fund directly.We are, though, committed to increasing significantly the levels of development assistance provided to Africa. We have already doubled our bilateral assistance to Africa since 1997, and will increase it by a further 50 per cent so that by 2006 we will be spending £1 billion in Africa each year.

asked Her Majesty's Government:What action will be taken under the New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) agreed at the G8 Summit in Kananaskis to reduce the debt burden of African countries and to improve trade links between Africa and G8 countries. [HL5111]

Over the course of the last year, a number of African leaders have been working together to draw up the New Partnership for Africa's Development which seeks to put in place the policies necessary in Africa for sustainable development. In response to this initiative, G8 leaders prepared an Africa Action Plan, which was finalised at the G8 Summit in Kananaskis. As part of this, G8 leaders agreed their commitment to ensure the full financing of the enhanced heavily indebted poor countries initiative and that up to an extra 1 billion US dollars should be provided for the HIPC Trust Fund. G8 leaders also "reaffirmed their commitment to conclude negotiations no later than 1 January 2005 on further trade liberalisation in the Doha round of multilateral trade negotiations taking full account of the particular circumstances, needs and requirements of developing countries, including in Africa". In addition, G8 countries will work toward the objective of duty free and quota free access for all products originating from least developed countries.The full version of the Africa Action Plan; which gives further details on these and other areas, has been placed in the House Library.

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they are entirely satisfed with the New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) agreed at the G8 Summit at Kananaskis. (HL5112]

The New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) is an African initiative that sets out a framework for conflict resolution and sustainable development in Africa. At Kananaskis, the G8 agreed on an Action Plan for Africa as an initial response to NEPAD. The plan is a good first step in what we see as a long-term process of building a new partnership with Africa. There is more to be clone to implement the commitments expressed by both the Africans and the G8.

Diplomatic Missions: Minor Traffic Violation Fines

asked Her Majesty's Government:How many outstanding parking arid other minor traffic violation fines were incurred by diplomatic missions during the year ending 31 December 2001. [HL5343]

Unpaid parking and minor traffic violation fines—2001—diplomatic vehicles.

Diplomatic mission International organisationNo of fines outstandingAmount
Angola1,088£44,470,00
United Arab Emirates287£14,150,00
Libya222£10,710,00
China156£6,400,00
Egypt151£7,030,00
Mozambique147£5,940,00
Iran140£8,250,00
Ukraine140£7,949,00
Qatar122£5,790,00
Greece111£5,650,00
Ghana96£4,090,00
France95£5,330,00
Turkey87£4,980,00
Algeria69£3,840,00
Morocco68£3,830,00
Zambia64£3,710,00
Russia51£2,800,00
Ethiopia47£1,990,00
Jamaica43£2,670,00
Jordan42£2,480,00
International Maritime Organisation40£2,000,00
Vietnam40£2,280,00
Cyprus39£1,790,00
Mongolia39£2,630,00
Georgia38£2,250,00
Brunei37£1,540,00
Kazakhstan37£2,180,00
Diplomatic mission International organisationNo of fines outstandingAmount
Philippines37£2,000,00
Albania35£1,430,00
Afghanistan34£1,940,00
Hungary32£1,390,00
Poland31£1,250,00
Bahrain30£1,650,00
Malaysia30£1,360,00
Yemen30£1,410,00
Pakistan29£1,680,00
Peru29£1,680,00
United States of America27£1,010,00
Cuba26£950,00
Oman26£3,010,00
Portugal25£3,550,00
Dominican Republic23£1,390,00
Romania22£1,140,00
Rwanda20£850,00
Tunisia20£1,200,00
Uganda20£,840,00
Kenya19£730,00
Sierra Leone19£2,120,00
Commonwealth Secretariat18£1,400,00
Kuwait16£6,810,00
Sudan16£760,00
Cote D'Ivoire15£1,810,00
Barbados15£600,00
Belgium15£780,00
Brazil14£950,00
Zimbabwe14£560,00
Mexico13£1,210,00
Spain13£1,050,00
Germany12£540,00
Bulgaria11£670,00
Gabon11£780,00
Uzbekistan11£470,00
4,254217,699

Diplomatic Missions Nndr

asked Her Majesty's Government:Which diplomatic missions in the United Kingdom owed more than £10,000 as of the 5 April in respect of national non-domestic rates (NNDR) for office premises. [HL5344]

Most diplomatic missions in the United Kingdom meet their obligations and pay the NNDR requested from them. However, as at 5 April 2002, the following missions owed over £10,000 in respect of NNDR:

CountryAmount
Bulgaria£117,511.13
Iran97,352.55
Sierra Leone48,274.76
Algeria43,194.62
Mozambique31,116.14
Cameroon27,646.19
Uganda24,760.37
Bangladesh20,636.91
Syria20,004.66
Zambia19,276.56
Senegal14,600.98
Jordan13,154.29
Cote d'Ivoire12,066.16
Total£489,595.32

Eleven additional diplomatic missions which each owe more than £10,000 in respect of NNDR have made arrangements with the Valuation Office Agency to clear their outstanding debts have not been included in the list. These 11 missions owe £729,731.66. The total amount outstanding from all missions, therefore, is £1,219,326.98

Public Guardianship Office: Annual Report And Accounts 2001–02

asked Her Majesty's Government:When the annual report and accounts for 2001–02 of the Public Guardian Office will be laid before Parliament. [HL5487]

I have today laid before the House the Public Guardianship Office's annual report and accounts for 2001–02 which gives full details of the agency's performance and expenditure for that year.

Criminal Justice: Government Response To Auld And Halliday Reports

asked the Lord Chancellor:When the Government expect to publish a detailed response to Sir Robin Auld's

Review of the Criminal Courts of England and Wales and John Halliday's of Making Punishments Work—a Review of the Sentencing Framework for England and Wales. [HL5488]

Justice for All presented to Parliament on 17 July set out our policy on reform of the criminal justice system. We made clear that we are indebted to Sir Robin Auld and John Halliday for their extensive and thorough review of the criminal courts and sentencing policy. Today we publish a detailed resonse to all their recommendations and I have placed copies in the Library of the House.

Lord Chancellor's Department

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will make an announcement on the recent changes in the functions of the Lord Chancellor's Department. [HL5489]

For the assistance of noble Lords I have today placed in the Library of each House a list which sets out briefly the current functions of my department.

Law Commission: Quinquennial Review

asked Her Majesty's Government:When the next quinquennial review of the Law Commission is to take place. [HL5490]

I am today announcing the start of a QQR of the Law Commission. The approach to the review will take into account the wider process of law reform and the relationship between the Law Commission and other agencies involved in that process, particularly government departments. It is expected that a final report, outlining key findings and recommendations, will be produced by the end of the year.John Halliday CB has been appointed as Head of Review. Mr Halliday has been selected for this role because of the extent of his knowledge of the operation of government, Parliament and the Civil Service. In particular, he has experience of working with the Law Commission and of leading the fundamental review of the framework for sentencing criminal offenders in England and Wales. This resulted in the Halliday report, 2001.Copies of the terms of reference for the review have been placed in the Libraries of both Houses.

Retrials In Serious Criminal Cases

asked Her Majesty's Government:What criteria have to be satisfied before a retrial can be ordered in a serious criminal case. [HL5194]

The Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department
(Baroness Scotland of Asthal)

In accordance with the Criminal Appeal Act 1968, a court can only order a retrial in a serious criminal case if (a) it is in the public interest to do so, and (b) the retrial would be conducted without unfairness to, or oppression of, the defendant.

Highland Midges

asked Her Majesty's Government:What action they are taking to encourage the search for effective measures to protect people and animals from attacks by Highland midges. [HL5016]

This matter is devolved to the Scottish Executive and the noble Lord may wish to write to them about the issue.

Treasury Silver

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord McIntosh of Haringey on 10 June (

WA5), by what criteria the Treasury determined that the threshold above which "not to sell items…with the greatest historical and heritage significance" should be £1 million; and whether these criteria are those followed by all government departments; and [HL5218]

Further to the Written Answer by Lord McIntosh of Haringey on 10 June ( WA5), why there is such a discrepancy between the Treasury's threshold of £1 million and the open general export licence limit of £39,600 for antique silver, when the purpose of the OGEL system is to prevent the dispersal of the national heritage; and [HL5219]

Further to the Written Answer by Lord McIntosh of Haringey on 11 April. ( WA115), by what criteria the Treasury determined that these 15 items of silver should be classified as a single group under their policy "not to sell items valued at over £1 million with the greatest historical and heritage significance"; and [HL5221]

Further to the Written Answer by Lord McIntosh of Haringey on 11 April ( WA115), why the lots of Privy Council silver that were withdrawn from auction on 29 October 2001 were not classified in the same group as the 12 candlesticks and inkstands, and therefore protected by the decision "not to sell items valued at over £1 million with the greatest historical and heritage significance". [HL5222]

The noble Lord's questions suggest that the Treasury has adopted a policy of not selling items valued at more than £1 million. That is not the case. The candlesticks and inkstands to which he refers were excluded from the sale because some of them are in operational use, not by reference to any arbitrary threshold or other policy. My previous statement that the items were valued at more than £1 million was an observation of fact, not an explanation of a policy.

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord McIntosh of Haringey on 11 April (

WA115), why, when the Treasury has stated that they are of "the greatest historical and heritage significance", these 15 items of silver are not classified as "heritage assets" under the guidelines provided in the Resource Accounting Manual. [HL5220]

While the items are of the greatest significance of any item in the Treasury's silver collection, they are not of such significance as to merit classification as heritage items—which is a term used to cover items of national importance such as Stonehenge and Nelson's column.

Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord McIntosh of Haringey on 10 June (

WA5), by what criteria the Treasury distinguishes an "antique asset" from an object classified under "fixtures and fittings". [HL5223]

There is no special definition of the term "antique"; it is taken as having its plain English meaning. All items which might possibly be considered as antiques are drawn to the attention of professional valuers, who confirm or reject this classification.

Life Peers

asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the actuarially expected mortality rate of life Peers year by year over the next 20 years, assuming that no life Peers are appointed. [HL5437]

The aggregate mortality rates of life Peers year by year over the next 20 years, assuming that no new life Peers are appointed, is estimated as follows:

PeriodEstimated mortality rate over per 100,000 alive at beginning of period
1 July 2002–30 June 20033,589
1 July 2003–30 June 20043,658
1 July 2004–30 June 20053,733
1 July 2005–30 June 20063,814
1 July 2006–30 June 20073,901
1 July 2007–30 June 20083,994
1 July 2008–30 June 20094,094
1 July 2009–30 June 20104,201
1 July 2010–30 June 20114,316
1 July 2011–30 June 20124,443
1 July 2012–30 June 20134,580
1 July 2013–30 June 20144,725
1 July 2014–30 June 20154,880
1 July 2015–30 June 20165,047
1 July 2016–30 June 20175,227
1 July 2017–30 June 20185,418
1 July 2018–30 June 20195,624
1 July 2019–30 June 20205,839
1 July 2020–30 June 20216,062
1 July 2021–30 June 20226,295
The aggregate mortality rates shown in the table give the numbers of expected deaths over the period shown, assuming 100,000 people alive at the beginning of the period. Since it is assumed that no new life Peers are created, the average age of those remaining increases over time and hence the aggregate mortality rate for those remaining also rises.The mortality rates shown in the table have been calculated by the Government Actuary's Department and are consistent with those used to project the numbers of life Peers at each 1 July for the period 1 July 2002 to 1 July 2012 assuming that no new life Peers are created, given in the written reply of 10 June 2002 to the Question of the noble Lord, Lord Jacobs, to the Lord Chancellor (

WA2).

Criminal Cases In Consequence Of 1994 Bomb Explosions At Embassy Of Israel And Balfour House

asked Her Majesty's Government:How many instances of human error affecting full disclosure occurred and when, both at first instance and on appeal, in the criminal cases tried in consequence of the bomb explosions on 26 Juy 1994, at the Embassy of Israel and Balfour House; and whether anyone has been disciplined on account of these errors. [HL5196]

The appellants in this matter have petitioned the House of Lords for leave to appeal. Whether leave to appeal will be granted is under active consideration. As such it is inappropriate at this stage to comment on matters which may in due course be aired in court.

Local Government

asked Her Majesty's Government:What monitoring of local government workings, where a cabinet system has been introduced, has been undertaken; and, if monitoring has taken place, what are the findings. [HL4688]

Officials at the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister maintain a record to monitor the implementation by local authorities under the Local Government Act 2000 of their new constitutions, including those authorities operating or planning to operate executive arrangements involving a cabinet.According to the information which local authorities have provided:as of 11 July 2002, 383 local authorities have implemented a new constitution, with the remaining three planning to implement by the end of 2002;316 authorities are operating executive arrangements involving a leader and cabinet;10 local authorities are or will be operating executive arrangements involving a directly elected mayor and cabinet;one local authority will be operating executive arrangements involving a directly elected mayor and cabinet;the remaining 59 authorities are operating the alternative form of arrangements available under the Act involving a streamlined version of the committee system. One of these will be holding a referendum on whether to move to arrangements involving a directly elected mayor and cabinet executive, having received a valid petition from local people which requires such a referendum.This monitoring supports the public service agreement target the Government have set to ensure that by December 2002 each council has adopted and put into operation a new constitution which is transparent, accountable and efficientIn addition, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister has recently let a contract to a consortium involving Manchester University, Birkbeck College London, Goldsmith College London and Salford University, to undertake a five-year evaluation of the new council constitutions policy, including the effectiveness of executive arrangements. Results of this evaluation are not yet available.

Parish Councils: Code Of Conduct

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Rooker on 13 June (HL Deb, cols. 367–68), what system is in place, and under what Act of Parliament, to address the situation when a parish councillor, in mid-term, refuses to sign the code of conduct, declines to fill in the register of interests and does not offer his or her resignation. [HL4996]

The Local Government Act 2000 requires members of parish councils to give a written undertaking to observe the authority's code of conduct. If a member fails to give that undertaking within two months of the authority adopting a code, he or she ceases to be a member of the authority.Members must complete a register of interests within 28 days of a code applying to their parish council, as a result either of the council adopting a code, or of the statutory application of the model code from 5 May on all councils which had not by then adopted a code. Failure to complete a register could lead to investigation by the Standards Board for England.

Accommodation For The Homeless: London

asked Her Majesty's Government:How accommodation for the homeless in London is monitored; against what specifications; and how the accommodation is funded. [HL5246]

Part 7 of the Housing Act 1996 requires local housing authorities to secure suitable accommodation for homeless applicants who are eligible for assistance, unintentionally homeless and have a priority need for accommodation for particular applicants having regard to the circumstances and needs of the applicant and their household. In determining whether accommodation is suitable for an applicant, authorities must have regard to Parts 9, 10 and 11 of the Housing Act 1996 which deal with slum clearance, overcrowding and houses in multiple occupation, respectively. Applicants have the right to ask for a review of the suitability of accommodation offered to them and, if dissatisfied with the authority's review decision, can appeal to the county court on a point of law.Where authorities secure accommodation for a homeless applicant under Part 7, they may require the applicant to pay reasonable charges for, or a reasonable contribution towards, the cost of the accommodation. Applicants on a low income may claim housing benefit towards the accommodation costs. The net costs to local authorities of securing accommodation for homeless applicants are funded through general grant. Costs related to the use of authorities' own housing stock which fall within the housing revenue account are supported by housing revenue account subsidy.

The annual general grant for English local authorities has already been increased by £8 million in respect of legislative changes that will be introduced by the Homelessness Act 2002 and the proposed Homelessness (Priority Need for Accommodation) (England) 2002. A further £10 million will be allocated to English authorities this year to help them implement the priority need order.

In March this year, a £35 million programme was launched to help local authorities ensure that by March 2004 no homeless family with children is in B&B other than in an emergency, and even then for no more than six weeks. Statutory guidance issued by my department makes it clear that if authorities do have to use bed-and-breakfast accommodation they should ensure that the accommodation meets statutory standards for houses in multiple occupation. My department is currently consulting with specialist bodies on draft proposals for minimum acceptable standards of B&B accommodation in advance of a wider consultation in due course.

In London, over 450 hostels provide around 19,600 beds for single homeless people. Hostels are funded in several ways. These include rent/housing benefit, supported housing management grant (SHMG) which is provided through the Housing Corporation revenue grant and other funding such as Section 180 grant funding.

As part of a drive to improve the information available to policy makers and service providers, the Homelessness Directorate set up within my department in March 2002 will investigate the range of accommodation available to homeless people. This will involve defining, and establishing, the number of different sorts of accommodation.

Supporting People and the Homelessness Act 2002 requirement for local authorities to conduct homelessness reviews will also improve the information collected on hostel use. In addition, to ensure that best practice is replicated throughout the country we are exploring the feasibility of ensuring that hostels are inspected in a structured way, by either the voluntary or statutory sectors.

Gypsy Accommodation

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will draw the attention of local authorities to the case of

Casey v Hertstmere in which it was decided that the borough council had not satisfied the requirements of Circular 1/94 in that it had failed to carry out any quantitative assessment of the need for gypsy accommodation. [HL5351]

I cannot comment on particular planning cases. Decision-makers in planning cases, including planning appeals, must take into account a variety of issues and circumstances as well as local and national planning policies whether they involve gypsies or members of the settled community. The weight to be attached to a particular concern is a matter of judgement for the decision-maker.

Science, Engineering And Technology

asked Her Majesty's Government:What are their plans for the future of science, engineering and technology in the United Kingdom. [HL5485]

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Trade and Industry
(Lord Sainsbury of Turville)

The Government are today publishing Investing in Innovation: a strategy for science, engineering and technology. This document sets out the Government's strategy for science, underpinned by the substantial new investment in science announced on 15 July by my right honourable friend the Member for Dunfermline East.It sets out what the Government propose to do, in partnership with other stakeholders, to ensure the long-term sustainability of our university research base. It provides details of how the Government intend to implement the recommendations of the Roberts review. It makes clear the Government's commitment to continuing to expand our research base by strengthening existing research programmes through the research councils and allowing for research into exciting and promising new areas of science.The document shows how government will further encourage collaboration between universities and the business sector through increased investment in knowledge transfer activities and, in particular, through an expansion of the Higher Education Innovation Fund. It also sets out how the DTI will increase the diffusion of advances in science and technology in the economy.Finally, it shows what steps the Government will take to improve the quality of the science done by government departments, and commissioned from others.Copies of the document have been placed in the Libraries of the House and may be viewed at

http://www.ost.gov.uk/whats_new.htm.

Dangerous Severe Personality Disorder

asked Her Majesty's Government:What funding they have made available in the past year for research into the treatment of "dangerous severe personality disorder". [HL5314]

The Government have allocated substantial funds for research into the treatment of individuals who are dangerous as a result of a severe personality disorder (DSPD). In total, during the past year the joint Home Office, Department of Health and Prison Service DSPD Programme contracted research on this issue to the value of £232,887.00.A further substantial programme of research into the treatment of DSPD is planned for 2003 and 2004.

Immigration And Nationality Directorate: Complaints Audit Committee Annual Report 2001–02

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they have received the annual report for 2001–02 of the Immigration and Nationality Directorate's independent Complaints Audit Committee. [HL5537]

A copy of the report has been placed in the Library and will be placed on the Immigration and Nationality Directorate website. It is a useful and informative document, and we are grateful to the committee for its comments and its recommendations. We are currently considering how best to implement the recommendations.

Prison Service: Key Performance Indicator Measures

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they intend to publish the final key performance indicator targets for the Prison Services for 2002–03. [HL5545]

The Prison Service Business Plan for 2002–03, published in February 2002, included key performance indicator (KPI) measures for the year but at that stage not all the associated targets had been finalised.The full set of measures and targets for 2002–03 are listed as follows:to ensure no escapes of Category A prisoners;to ensure that the number of escapes from prisons and from escorts undertaken by Prison Service staff, expressed as a proportion of the average prison population, is lower than 0.05 per cent;to ensure that the number of escapes from contracted-out escorts is no more than one per 20,000 prisoners handled;to ensure that the number of positive adjudications of assault on prisoners, staff and others, expressed as a proportion of the average prison population, is lower than 9 per cent;to ensure that the number of prisoners held two to a cell designed for one, expressed as a proportion of the average prison population, does not exceed 18 per cent;to ensure that the number of minority ethnic staff in the Prison Service, expressed as a proportion of the total workforce, is at least 4.5 per cent by April 2003;to ensure that average staff sickness does not exceed nine working days per person by April 2003;to ensure that the average cost per uncrowded prison place does not exceed £38,743;to ensure that the average cost per prisoner does not exceed £36,539;

to deliver 7,100 accredited offending behaviour programme completions in 2002–03, including 950 sex offender treatment programmes;

to ensure that prisoners spend on average at least 24 hours per week in purposeful activity;

to ensure the rate of positive results from random mandatory drug tests is lower than 10 per cent by April 2003;

to achieve a 5 per cent reduction in the number of self-inflicted deaths expressed as a rate per 100,000 of average population compared with 2001–02;

prisoners to achieve 45,000 key skills awards and 28,800 in basic skills including 10,800 at level 2, 12,000 at level 1 and 6,000 at entry level;

to ensure 28,200 prisoners have a job, training or education place after release by April 2003; and

to develop and pilot a joint indicator with the Department of Health to reduce waiting times for mental health transfers and to implement the KPI from April 2003.

Forensic Science Service

asked Her Majesty's Government:What plans they have to review the Forensic Science Service. [HL5546]

A review of the Forensic Science Service will commence on 2 September and is expected to be completed by spring 2003. The review team, independently lead by Robert McFarland, a former chief executive of the BOC Group, has been appointed and preliminary work is already underway. A steering group, chaired by one of my officials, will oversee the review and recommendations will be made to me in due course. We will report back to the House on its findings.The review process will provide extensive opportunities for consultation work with internal and external stakeholders and will follow the procedures recommended in the guidance for the review of executive agencies and non-departmental public bodies published by the Cabinet Office.

Police Use Of Firearms

asked Her Majesty's Government:What the most recent statistics are for the police use of firearms. [HL5550]

The statistics for April 2000 to March 2001 show that the number of police operations in which firearms were issued was 11,109. The number of occasions on which firearms were discharged by police increased to nine.There was a small decrease in the number of operations in which armed response vehicles were deployed.

Full details are set out in the tables:

Number of Operations in which Firearms were Authorised

1997–98

1998–99

1999–2000

2000–01

Total

11,842

10,928

10,915

11,109

Avon & Somerset139889065
Bedfordshire323260190294
Cambridgeshire96437571
Cheshire216299386545
Cleveland103357628
City of London3071471253
Cumbria68522430
Derbyshire147176178167
Devon & Cornwall1336165151
Dorset546979174
Durham10311411440
Essex505590497435
Gloucestershire51525248
Greater Manchester165160224357
Hampshire217129103114
Hertfordshire82757386
Humberside472317193158
Kent423928583
Lancashire338616267242
Leicestershire89109222217
Lincolnshire5257155336
Merseyside675484489825
Metropolitan2,5782,7422,8621,862
Norfolk128185239226
Northamptonshire77515758
Northumbria823683465708
North Yorkshire102696172
Nottinghamshire306266255233
South Yorkshire302135237127
Staffordshire240209174203
Suffolk193174165176
Surrey8760143221
Sussex330123185353
Thames Valley227158110153
Warwickshire152291194233
West Mercia13213011036
West Midlands227305362485
West Yorkshire630662813822
Wiltshire26241966
Dyfed Powys27383718
Gwent86643930
North Wales310386371195
South Wales101148255363

Number of Authorised Firearms Officers (AFOs)

1997–98

1998–99

1999–2000

2000–01

Total

6,585

6,308

6,262

6,064

Avon & Somerset161153150135
Bedfordshire42504645
Cambridgeshire80807773
Cheshire82707574
Cleveland84788075
City of London81557374
Cumbria122989894
Derbyshire100877781
Devon & Cornwall14782119100
Dorset72726667
Durham14496101101
Essex217235228195
Gloucesteshire84797772
Greater Manchester182217218240
Hampshire112110111100
Hertfordshire41435244
Humberside10210297102
Kent150130136136
Lancashire125132143132
Leicestershire94909085
Lincolnshire85757880
Merseyside16512196103
Metropolitan1,9711,9511,9771,940
Norfolk102109110114
Northamptonshire92927577
Northumbria126123114109
North Yorkshire95835966
Nottinghamshire129120116137
South Yorkshire1089010098

Number of Authorised Firearms Officers (AFOs)

1997–98

1998–99

1999–2000

2000–01

Staffordshire86928167
Suffolk961019890
Surrey61697172
Sussex146156131118
Thames Valley194179187185
Warwickshire38445445
West Mercia159139129130
West Midlands95929383
West Yorkshire114128110117
Wiltshire105888971
Dyfed Powys71676561
Gwent59646866
North Wales90979267
South Wales176169155143

Number of Operations involving Armed Response Vehicles (ARVs)

Annex C

1997–98

1998–99

1999–2000

2000–01

Total

7,544

7,791

8,276

8,179

Avon & Somerset121837856
Bedfordshire285240172253
Cambridgeshire19275436
Cheshire166247330441
Cleveland57*292516
City of London34322430
Cumbria43382127
Derbyshire99153167152
Devon & Cornwall584352121
Dorset506669155
Durham85846731
Essex180285244206
Gloucestershire48494439
Greater Manchester5643173302
Hampshire1701149084
Hertfordshire25264465
Humberside437277181136
Kent212745864
Lancashire321596250177
Leicestershire68109144195
Lincolnshire3442141324
Merseyside55939646675
Metropolitan9541,5731,8121,380
Norfolk117167210192
Northamptonshire29322135
Northumbria515503397655
North Yorkshire52304054
Nottinghamshire256*246232207
South Yorkshire252115214103
Staffordshire206185131136
Suffolk135104101103
Surrey7646110192
Sussex2840*172245
Thames Valley184139108108
Warwickshire127220158194
West Mercia98999826
West Midlands102129138243
West Yorkshire586630787785
Wiltshire21171548
Dyfed Powys19303718
Gwent47392717
North Wales260298354155
South Wales97136220298

* these forces have changed the counting method for incidents to which ARVs are deployed

England Rural Development Programme

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answers by Lord Whitty on 19 June (

WA89) and on 16 July ( WA137), whether they will now answer the Question with

regard to administrative costs for each £1 of grant aid subsidy made under the environmental programme. [HL5400]

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
(Lord Whitty)

For each £1 of grant paid under the England Rural Development Programme the Government spend approximately 18p on technical advice to recipients and administration.

Defra And Forestry Commission: Spending Plans

asked Her Majesty's Government:What are the spending plans for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and for the Forestry Commission for the next three years following the 2002 Spending Review. [HL5431]

The results of the Spending Review for Defra and the Forestry Commission are summarised in Chapter 16 of the White Paper on 2002 Spending Review (Cm 5570). The key figures are as follows:

£ million
2002–032003–042004–052005–06
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Resource Budget2,4432,7652,7422,792
Capital Budget241316344354
Total Departmental Expenditure Limit12,5232,9022,8902,944
Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs12,4262,8082,7962,850
Forestry Commission197949494
Near-cash spending in Defra DEL22,3412,7272,7102,757
1 Full resource budgeting basis, net of depreciation.
2 Consistent with previous control basis.
When Defra was created, the objective was to have a step change in the way environment, agriculture and rural issues were treated in government. The aim was to create a department with sustainable development at its heart—and with responsibility for supporting sustainable development across government. For Defra this means working to achieve a better environment at home and internationally. It also means a food and farming industry working within a prosperous countryside, producing the food that consumers want in harmony with the environment.For the Government as a whole, sustainable development goes much further. The vital importance of sustainable development for government as a whole underlay the decision to make it a central theme of the Spending Review. As custodian of the Government's sustainable development strategy, I particularly welcome the elements of the settlement, for my own department and for others, which will deliver significant improvements in key policy areas. These include.

Climate change—where we will invest in innovation to meet our climate change objectives, building on existing funding for renewable energy sources with an additional £38 million in 2005–06 compared with 2002–03, and make further progress towards our greenhouse gas emissions targets;

Health—where we have announced the biggest ever sustained spending growth in the history of the NHS, to improve health outcomes and the quality of care for patients;

Education—where increased spending and further reforms are aimed at getting and helping 16–19 year olds into further education;

And Crime—where extra funding for the police will help them target reductions in vehicle crime, domestic burglaries and robbery, and reduce the gap between the highest crime local areas and the best comparable areas.

In addition, new spending on transport and regeneration will improve the quality of our local environments. For example, capital expenditure on capital transport plans—which includes expenditure on home zones, cycling, walking and local safety schemes—is doubling in real terms from 2001–11 as part of the Ten Year Transport Plan. The neighbourhood renewal fund is being increased from £400 million in 2003–04 to £525 million in 2005–06, in part reflecting an increased commitment to safer and cleaner communities.

Let me now explain how the Spending Review settlement will impact on Defra's programmes over the next three years and will assist the department in pursuing its aims and objectives.

Sustainable Farming and Food

When Defra was created, the farming industry was in crisis. Foot and mouth disease, coupled with the lowest farm incomes in many years, had destroyed farmers' confidence and, in some cases, their livelihoods. The review provides Defra with the resources to make progress—working together with the industry—towards a more sustainable future for the farming and food industries. Investment totalling over £500 million over three years will be available to support the key recommendations of the policy commission chaired by Sir Don Curry, and to improve animal health and welfare.

Action through the England Rural Development Programme, including:

A new broad and shallow agri-environment scheme which will reward farmers for delivering environmentally friendly outcomes to be piloted over the next two years and then rolled out in full in 2005–06;

An expansion of schemes such as the Rural Enterprise Scheme, the Processing and Marketing Grants Scheme and the Vocational Training Scheme to assist people in rural areas retrain, diversify and extend their businesses;

A more efficient food chain;

Enhanced farm advice; and

Further measures to improve animal health and welfare, including livestock identification and tracing systems, enhanced testing for TSE-type disease (such as BSE); and further action to prevent illegal meat imports.

The additional funding will rise to £200 million in 2005–06, of which £75 million has been specifically allocated to fund, alongside equivalent EU funding, the full roll-out of the new agri-environment scheme in England. Additional funding will also be made available to the devolved administrations to allow them to increase expenditure on their rural development programmes. In return for the investment in their industry, farmers will be expected to play their part in making the industry sustainable, for example by acting to reduce the risks of animal disease. I know they will co-operate with us fully in achieving these joint goals.

The Government will continue to press for radical reform of the common agriculture policy (CAP) in the negotiations on the mid-term review of Agenda 2000 which began earlier this week. But the resources allocated in the Spending Review allow Defra to press ahead with reform and modernisation of the fanning industry now. The department will publish its strategy for sustainable farming and food in the autumn. I am very pleased that Sir Don Curry has agreed to chair a group which will act as a driver and overseer of change in the farming and food sectors through the implementation of the farming and food strategy, to ensure that we move rapidly towards a more sustainable, competitive and diverse farming and food industry which contributes to a thriving rural economy. The group will report to me.

The settlement recognises the need to prevent, control and manage the risk of animal disease, where we are driven by the memory of last year's outbreak of foot and mouth disease as well as the legacy of BSE. The additional resources provided will allow funding of a wide range of work on animal health issues. These measures will be set in the context of a comprehensive animal health and welfare strategy, as recommended by the policy commission. This will address ways in which the industry should bear its share of the costs of animal health controls and services. I am also pleased to be able to announce that we have secured additional funds to deal with bovine TB this year. These will be used to pay for the extra staff and resources already committed to work on the TB testing backlog and control measures, and additional casual staff who will be recruited to supplement this work. Testing is being carried out on the basis of a veterinary risk assessment, with those posing the greatest risk being tested first.

A countryside for all to enjoy

In addition to the new agri-environment scheme, which will play an important role in making the countryside more attractive and in helping to preserve biodiversity, the Spending Review has allocated an additional £5 million in 2004–05 and £10 million in 2005–06 for work in bringing our major wildlife sites into favourable condition. In addition, the extra funding of £5 million in 2003–04 and £10 million in the two following years to implement the Countryside and Rights of Way (CROW) Act will increase public access and enjoyment of our beautiful countryside landscapes.

Thriving rural economies and communities

The investment in sustainable food and farming, in improving the condition of sites of special scientific interest (SSSIs) and in opening up access to the countryside will benefit the wider rural economy. However, Defra's leadership role on rural affairs goes beyond this and our new rural PSA target reflects this. It commits us to reducing the gap in productivity between the least well-performing rural areas and the English average and making services more accessible for rural people. Defra will work with other government departments and agencies to deliver this and to ensure that the rural-proofing of their policies and programmes helps to deliver real improvements in prosperity and access to public services. The Spending Review White Paper sets out a range of commitments from other departments to deliver key services in rural areas and ensure that rural people benefit from the extra resources delivered through the review. The extra £25 million allocated in the settlement over three years will further increase the additional funds announced in the Rural White Paper to help regenerate in market towns and improve the ability of rural communities and the rural voluntary sector to deliver services in support of the socially excluded and progress towards solutions to key rural concerns in each region.

Protecting our communities from flooding

Government investment in flood defence has increased significantly in real terms since 1997. Additional funding of £15 million a year was made available in the wake of the autumn 2000 floods. The new funds over and above this which have been allocated in the Spending Review will ensure that this growth will now accelerate to reach 8.6 per cent a year in real terms over the SR2002 period. The further allocation to the department of £15 million in 2004–05 and £40 million in 2005–6, together with the amounts available for grants to local authorities and the revenues we expect to be able to raise from new funding mechanisms, will deliver an increase of £150 million in the third year of the review. This level of resources, together with simplification of the administration of flood defences and effective partnership working with homeowners, local government, the Environment Agency, scientists and the insurance industry, will allow us to reduce the risk of threats to life and damage to property from flooding.

Sustainable use of resources: the challenge from waste

The Spending Review settlement takes into account the pressures on local government and provides for spending on environmental, protective and cultural services, including waste management, to rise by £671 million by 2005–06. The funds will also enable them to deal with the short-term problems of fridge disposal and changes to the legislation on hazardous waste. Final decisions on additional resources for addressing the challenge of growth in municipal waste and moving away from landfill disposal and on other policy measures will be made available when the Performance and Innovation Unit (PIU) publishes its report into sustainable waste management in the autumn. These decisions and those on landfill tax and the future of the Landfill Tax Credit Schemes (LCTS) will deliver a step change in performance. Defra's PSA target of 25 per cent recycling and composting of household waste by 2005–06 demonstrates the Government's commitment to radical reform of municipal waste management.

Science

Evidence-based policy work is central to Defra's approach. I want, at the very least, to maintain the department's expenditure on research in real terms over the Spending Review period. This is consistent with our commitment to the development of a strong and high quality science base. It will ensure that Defra's policy-making continues to be based on the latest evidence and scientific and economic analysis. We will aim to increase science spending in our identified priority areas. These include: environmental horizon-scanning, climate change and extreme weather, a supercomputer to strengthen the UK climate change research capability, non-food crops, organic food production and animal disease. We will also examine the findings of the foot and mouth disease inquiries closely and determine if any additional funding for research is required in these areas.

Investment in the department

A theme of the Spending Review across all departments has been ensuring that they have the necessary capacity to deliver. That has been a primary focus of the developing Defra change programme that was set up after the department was created last year. Additional funding of £140 million over the Spending Review period for investment in the department will enable it to take forward the next phase of the change programme flowing from the recent joint strategic review carried out with the Office for Public Service Reform (OPSR). The investment will give staff the tools they need to change their ways of working, focus on customers and deliver the high quality services that will build Defra's reputation as a respected, high performing, and efficient department.

Forestry Commission

The Forestry Commission is funded on a net basis after taking account of the income it received, mainly from sales of timber from the public forests. Its timber income has fallen significantly in recent years due to a worldwide slump in timber prices. The Spending Review settlement provides additional funding of £5 million a year on top of the 2003–04 baseline to enable the commission to continue to drive forward the Government's England Forestry Strategy despite the reduction in timber income. This new money underlines forestry's important place in England's rural affairs and will allow the commission to extend sustainable forests management, restore more native woodlands, increase community forests and the role of forests in tackling industrial dereliction. In addition to the funding shown in the White Paper, the commission is also benefiting from special funding from the Capital Modernisation Fund and the Invest to Save Budget amounting to almost £11 million in the next two years.

Conclusion

Spending by the department in 2005–06 will be more than £400 million higher than in 2002–03, supporting a programme of reform. It fulfils the Government's pledge to introduce a significant programme of measures to move the food and farming industries to a long-term sustainable basis, to create thriving and prosperous rural economies and communities and to improve the environment. And it takes full account of the department's lead role in promoting sustainable development across government for the good of our citizens, both now and in the future.

Veterinary Laboratories Agency Targets

asked Her Majesty's Government:What targets they have set the Veterinary Laboratories Agency for 2002–03. [HL5432]

We have set the Veterinary Laboratories Agency the following performance targets for 2002–03.Quality of Service1. To maintain current third party accreditations.2. To achieve ISO9000 accreditation for the TSE archive.Service Delivery3. To achieve a minimum of 85 per cent of ROAME project milestones.4. To meet 95 per cent of published turnaround time for export tests.5. To set a baseline for the customer satisfaction survey.Efficiency6. To achieve £500k savings on procurement spending.7. To achieve a 3 per cent improvement of overheads against turnover using the baseline established in 2001–02.Financial Performance8. To recover from government departments, agencies and external customers, the full economic cost of the agency's services.

Environment Agency Management Statement

asked Her Majesty's Government:When they expect to issue a revised management statement to the Environment Agency. [HL5433]

We are pleased to inform the House that the management statement has been issued to the Environment Agency today. The statement sets out the relationships between the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, the Welsh Assembly Government, exercising powers delegated by the National Assembly for Wales and the Environment Agency; the framework within which the agency will operate; and other guidance relevant to its functions. The management statement has been drawn up in consultation with the agency and is being issued jointly with the Welsh Assembly Government.A copy of the Statement has been placed in the Libraries of both Houses.

Animal Health And Welfare Expenditure

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will provide an explanation for the animal health and welfare expenditure trends shown in the departmental report for 2002. [HL5435]

Tables 5.1 to 5.5 in the departmental report for 2002 contain a number of errors. These arose from differences in the way information is loaded on central databases, complications with compiling historical information following the recent machinery of government changes and the restructuring of Defra with the revised objectives that followed. Unfortunately, the tight timetable for producing these tables interfered with the quality assurance procedures that would normally have applied.The department's quality assurance procedures are being revised to prevent similar errors in future. Meanwhile, work is in hand to re-issue corrected tables. This is a significant task involving the re-loading of central databases which are subject to a number of timetable constraints. The intention is to provide revised figures by the autumn.Meanwhile, it is possible to clarify that underlying provision for resources available to control animal disease has risen in real terms over the period as follows:

1999–2000 Cash outturn2000–01 Cash outturn2001–02 Provisional resource outturn2002–03 Resource budget
£152m£183m£159m£206m
These figures exclude expenditure incurred on foot and mouth disease, given that this was funded centrally out of the reserve. The drop seen in 2001–02 can be explained by the diversion of state veterinary staff to tackling foot and mouth disease.

Adoption

asked Her Majesty's Government:How many would-be adopters have been rejected after assessment in each of the last live years. [HL4934]

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health
(Lord Hunt of Kings Heath)

The information requested is not collected centrally.However, the department funded a study published by the British Association for Adoption and Fostering in 2000 called

Children and families in the voluntary sector—An overview of child placement and adoption work by voluntary adoption agencies in England 1994–1998. This study was based on a sample of 949 cases from existing data collected and held by the Social Services Inspectorate. The SSI obtain the information during the inspection of voluntary adoption agencies. The study found that where a decision was made about applicants who had applied to voluntary adoption agencies 94 per cent were successful. The study did not include decisions made by local authorities.

Prostate Cancer And Aids: Government Expenditure

asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the total sum of government money spent on research into (a) prostate cancer and (b) AIDS; and what is the annual number of deaths due to each. [HL5023]

In 2000–01, the latest year for which complete information is available for the United Kingdom, the total government expenditure on research into prostate cancer was estimated to be £2 million and on research into AIDS was estimated to be £21 million. In 2000, in the United Kingdom, the total number of deaths due to prostate cancer was 9,280 and the total number of deaths due to HIV/AIDS was 418.The total government expenditure in 2000–01 on prostate cancer research includes £1.2 million by the Department of Health on directly commissioned research. The department is committed to increasing this expenditure to £4.2 million a year by 2003–04. The total government expenditure in 2000–01 on cancer

Probable route of infection
Year of diagnosisSex between menSex between men and womenInjecting drug useBlood/Blood factorMother to childOther/un-determinedTotal
1984 or earlier*68426312569261,617
19852,112542766863983,229
19861,9891564488910752,767
19871,7472373825010832,509
19881,3802412302513621,951
19891,4523592122916722,140
19901,7005342002429562,543
19911,7126462412436562,715
19921,6397801872457532,740
19931,4987662031766632,613
19941,4807931681760532,571
19951,4658491812059652,639
19961,5398371722160561,685
19971,3901,0051682782512,723

research was estimated to be £190 million, and an unquantifiable proportion of this will have been spent on research that is relevant to many types of cancer, including prostate.

Hiv

asked Her Majesty's Government:What are the number of cases of HIV identified in (a) the United Kingdom and (b) the London region in each of the years since the condition was first recorded; whether they have identified any patterns from those figures, with particular regard to means of transmission; and whether they will give details of measures being taken to bring down the number of cases in the United Kingdom. [HL5061]

Figures for reported cases of HIV infection diagnosed in the United Kingdom and in the London region are shown in the first table.

Year of diagnosisLondon regionUK total
1984 or earlier*7741,617
19851,8023,229
19861,6182,767
19871,5482,509
19881,2021,951
19891,3752,140
19901,6362,543
19911,7542,715
19921,6972,740
19931,6232,613
19941,5842,571
19951,6812,639
19961,7052,685
19971,7162,723
19981,7602,799
19991,9413,030
20002,2623,723
2001**2,3624,164
Total30,04049,158
The second table shows the figures for UK-diagnosed HIV infections according to probable route of infection.

Probable route of infection

Year of diagnosis

Sex between men

Sex between men and women

Injecting drug use

Blood/Blood factor

Mother to child

Other/un-determined

Total

19981,3441,1541301092692,799
19991,3261,4051091980913,030
20001,4371,88010022951893,723
2001**1,3382,2268921524384,164
Total27,23213,9483,8081,6948201,65649,158

* Data for 1984 and earlier years have been combined as these pre-date the availability of the first HIV antibody test.

** Numbers, particularly for recent years, will rise as further reports are received.

Source: Public Health Laboratory Service: data to the end of March 2002.

A number of trends are apparent from these data. It is important to note, however, that diagnosed infections may not reflect contemporary transmission patterns, as many years may elapse between infection and diagnosis. For example, a very high proportion of infections acquired through sex between men and women were recorded as probably acquired abroad, mainly in sub-Saharan Africa. Therefore, although more infections have been diagnosed among heterosexuals for the past three years, sex between men remains the predominant route of HIV transmission within the UK. Around half of all HIV-infected individuals currently living in the UK were infected by this route.

The Sexual Health and HIV Strategy for England prioritises the prevention of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. In line with the epidemiology, HIV prevention and health promotion targets those groups most at risk, particularly men who have sex with men and heterosexuals from or with close links to African countries. For a number of years we have funded the Terrence Higgins Trust to undertake national HIV prevention work for gay men through the CHAPS project (Community HIV/AIDS Prevention Strategy). As part of the implementation of the Sexual Health and HIV Strategy we are working with the African HIV Policy Network and the National AIDS Trust to develop a strategic framework for HIV prevention. The strategy also announced a new information campaign for the general population in England to raise awareness of sexually transmitted infections (including HIV) and how they can be prevented. We plan to launch the new campaign later this year.

Furthermore, the routine offer and recommendation of an HIV test to all pregnant women is enabling women to benefit from treatment for themselves and for their babies to reduce the risk of mother to child transmission. An estimated 75 infections in infants were averted in 2000.

Contraceptive Advice For Young People

asked Her Majesty's Government:When questions of conscientious objection to abortion referral and contraceptive provision to under-16s were included in local audits of general practice; and who they consulted beforehand. [HL5164]

Best Practice Guidance on the Provision of Effective Contraceptive and Advice Services for Young People was issued to local teenage pregnancy co-ordinators in 2000. The guidance is a specific action point of the Government's Teenage Pregnancy Strategy and sets out the criteria by which contraceptive advice services should be commissioned and provided. This includes the provision of confidential contraceptive advice to under-16s within the established legal framework, the provision of early pregnancy testing and non-judgmental advice, and, where abortion is the agreed course, quick referral to NHS funded abortion services in line with the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Evidence Based Guideline 7 (2000).In 2001 the Teenage Pregnancy Unit provided an audit questionnaire for local areas to review community contraceptive services and general practice against the

Best Practice Guidance in order to identify gaps in provision and plan improvements. The majority of areas completed their general practice audits by March 2002.

The guidance and the audit questionnaire were developed in consultation with health professionals, including those representing general practice on the Government's Independent Advisory Group on Teenage Pregnancy.

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether it is their policy to encourage general practitioners to provide abortions or contraception to under-16s; and, if so, how they propose to do this. [HL5165]

The Government's Teenage Pregnancy Strategy recognises the importance of helping young people resist peer pressure to have early sex while seeking to ensure that those who are sexually active have easy access to high quality contraceptive advice. Under-16s are at particular risk of unprotected sex. Although over a quarter are sexually active, they are less likely than older teenagers to access services and use contraception. Teenagers who become pregnant often delay seeking advice from a health professional and are more likely to have late abortions and miss out on antenatal care.

Improving access to professional advice by sexually active teenagers is a central strand of the Teenage Pregnancy Strategy. General practitioners have a key role to play in this. Best Practice Guidance on the Provision of Effective Contraception and Advice Services was issued in 2000 setting out the criteria against which services should be commissioned and provided. The guidance includes the provision of contraceptive advice to under-16s within the established legal framework and highlights that health professionals' duty of confidentiality to under-16s is the same as that owed to older patients. Services are also expected to provide early pregnancy testing, non-judgmental advice and, where abortion is the agreed option, quick referral to NHS funded abortion in line with the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists evidence based guideline The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion (2000). General practitioners are expected to work to the principles of the guidance.

Section 4 of the Abortion Act 1967, as amended, which relates to conscientious objection to abortion, does not extend to giving advice or performing the preparatory steps to arrange an abortion where the request meets the legal requirements. Such steps include referral to another doctor, without delay.

Local teenage pregnancy strategy partnerships have been auditing services against the guidance to identify gaps in provision and plan improvements. Each area is developing plans with the relevant PCTs to support general practice in meeting the needs of their teenage patients. The Teenage Pregnancy Unit is also working closely with the Royal College of General Practitioners to develop relevant training materials.

Nhs Bodies: Contracts With Non-Uk Organisations

asked Her Majesty's Government:Which National Health Service bodies will enter into contracts with non-United Kingdom organisations to carry out operations on National Health Service patients in England; and, if any of those National Health Service bodies are strategic health authorities, how that will affect the commissioning responsibilities of primary care trusts. [HL5187]

Decisions on which National Health Service bodies will enter into these contracts are likely to depend on the exact nature of the contracts proposed. As the prospectus Growing Capacity, a new role for external healthcare providers in England notes, NHS commissioners will have a key role—working with the Department of Health—in defining their requirements from international establishment initiatives.

Mental Health Bill: Categories Of Mental Disorder

asked Her Majesty's Government:In the context of the draft Mental Health Bill, which definitions they prefer for "personality", "personality disorder", "severe personality disorder", "dangerous severe personality disorder" and "dangerous". [HL5311]

The draft Mental Health Bill does not define particular categories of mental disorder. This means that no particular clinical diagnosis will have the effect of limiting the way the powers are used. The same conditions will be used to determine whether an individual falls within the scope of the legislation whatever their diagnosis.The Government have not attempted to produce new definitions for the terms described, but would accept those in general usage and agreed clinical definitions. There is an internationally recognised classification system for personality disorder and these clinical definitions are accepted in relation to the term personality disorder where it is used in the consultation document attached to the draft Mental Health Act.The World Health Organisation and the American Psychiatric Association have produced definitions of personality disorder. The

International Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders (ICD-10) (World Health Organisation 1992), defines a personality disorder as: "a severe disturbance in the characterological condition and behavioural tendencies of the individual, usually involving several areas of the personality, and nearly always associated with considerable personal and social disruption". The fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) (American Psychiatric Association 1994) defines a personality disorder as: "an enduring pattern of inner experience and behaviour that deviates markedly from the expectations of the individual's culture".

The classification system does not distinguish between "personality disorder" and "severe personality disorder". The term "dangerous and severe personality disorder" is not a recognised clinical classification.

The term "severe personality disorder" is now in general use as a means of identifying, from within the millions of people with a degree of personality disorder in this country, the relatively small number whose condition is so serious as to require specialist interventions.

It is acknowledged that dangerous and severe personality disorder does not exist as a condition in its own right. The DSPD Programme has adopted the term DSPD as a working title and is currently developing—with clinicians and others—a supporting description that will be more meaningful to clinicians, lawyers and the general public. Any definition and description will be considered as part of the evaluation of the pilot projects.

Disability Equipment

asked Her Majesty's Government:What action they have taken so far on the report of the Audit Commission, published in March 2000, on the quality of artificial limbs, surgical appliances and disability equipment services in the United Kingdom. [HL5320]

The National Health Service Purchasing and Supplies Agency (PASA) is in ongoing consultation with the industry regarding supply of disability equipment in general, which includes discussion regarding research and development. The Department of Health's Medical Devices Agency is responsible for enforcing regulations which cover safety and quality aspects of disability equipment. The agency investigates adverse incidents involving these products in conjunction with the manufacturers. Resultant design or material changes generally improve product quality.The NHS Plan set targets to integrate health and social care community equipment services and to increase by 50 per cent the number of people who can benefit from such services by 2004. A national implementation support team has been established to help local NHS and social services organisations through the transition from separate to integrated services.In relation to orthotics, PASA and others are working together to identify and resolve service problems with a view to developing improved patient outcomes and patient focussed service provision. The quality of the finish of artificial limbs has been improved by the introduction of silicone cosmesis covers, funding for which has been increased by £4 million over three years from April 2001: £30.75 million has also been invested in modernisation of hearing aid services, including the provision of high quality digital hearing aids.

Meat Hygiene Service Annual Report And Accounts

asked Her Majesty's Government:When the 2001–02 annual report and accounts for the Meat Hygiene Service will be laid before Parliament. [HL5491]

The 2001–02 annual report and accounts for the Meat Hygiene Service were laid before Parliament today. Copies are available in the Library, but formal printing and publication will not occur for another six to eight weeks, pending preparation of a version in Welsh as required by the Welsh Language Act.

Medicines Control Agency Annual Report And Accounts

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will publish the annual report and accounts of the Medicines Control Agency. [HL5493]

We have received the report and copies have today been laid before both Houses of Parliament in accordance with the requirements of Section 5(2) and 5(3) of the Exchequer and Audit Departments Act 1921. Copies have also been placed in the Library.

Medicines Commission Annual Report And Accounts

asked Her Majesty's Government:When they expect to receive the annual report of the Medicines Commission for 2001; and whether this will be published [HL5494]

We have received the report, and copies have been laid before both Houses of Parliament today in accordance with the requirements of Section 5(2) of the Medicines Act 1968.Bound volumes have been placed in the Library containing the 2001 reports of the Medicines Commission, the Committee on Safety of Medicines, the Advisory Board on the Registration of Homoeopathic Products, the British Pharmacopoeia Commission, the Independent Review Panel on Advertising, the Independent Panel for Borderline Products and the Veterinary Products Committee.We are glad to acknowledge the valuable work done by the distinguished members of the Medicines Act advisory bodies and thank them for the time and effort dedicated in the public interest to this important work.

Nhs Pensions Agency

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will publish the annual report and accounts of the National Health Service Pensions Agency. [HL5495]

We have approved the annual report and accounts which have today been laid before the House of Commons in accordance with the requirements of Section 7 of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000. Copies have been placed in the Library.

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will publish the key targets for 2002–03 of the National Health Service Pensions Agency; and whether they will make an announcement over the future of the agency [HL5496]

We have agreed the agency's key targets for 2002–03, and have placed copies in the Libraries of both Houses. A review of the agency will be completed by the end of this year. This will address the performance of the agency and will examine the options ("prior options") for the future of the agency.

Religious Organisations Broadcasting Licences

asked Her Majesty's Government:Which other member states of the European Union have enacted statutory discrimination legislation to prevent religious organisations holding a wide range of broadcasting licences. [HL5416]

The Minister of State, Department for Culture, Media and Sport
(Baroness Blackstone)

We hold no information on which other member states of the European Union have legislation preventing religious organisations from holding certain broadcasting licences.

Centre For Management And Policy Studies Annual Report And Accounts

asked Her Majesty's Government:When they will publish the annual report and accounts for the Centre for Management and Policy Studies. [HL5466]

The Minister for the Cabinet Office and Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
(Lord Macdonald of Tradeston)

Copies of the second annual report and accounts for the Centre for Management and Policy Studies for the year 1 April 2001 to 31 March 2002 have been placed in the Libraries of the House.The report and accounts show that financial targets have been met. The quality targets were met and in some cases exceeded. The volume targets for participants in training and development were exceeded in the aggregate.The changes to the Cabinet Office announced by Sir Andrew Turnbull, and presently being implemented in advance of his arrival in September, will have a significant effect on CMPS as an organisation.

It Procurement: Open Source Software

asked Her Majesty's Government:What their policy is towards the use of open source software to enable increased value for money in IT procurement across the public sector. [HL5467]

This Government are intent on securing the best value for money in their IT procurements by encouraging the development of a flourishing IT industry which supplies both proprietary and open source software solutions to the public sector. Government procurement decisions will be based on the ability of the solutions to deliver effective and economic systems and services.I am pleased to announce new policy on the use of open source software within UK Government. It explains how we will consider open source software solutions alongside proprietary ones in IT procurements and award contracts on a value for money basis, seeking to avoid lock-in to proprietary IT products and services. In addition, the UK Government will consider obtaining full rights to bespoke software code or customisations of COTS (commercial off the shelf) software they procure wherever this achieves best value for money. They will also explore further the possibilities of using OSS as the default exploitation route for government funded R&D software.The open source software policy has been formulated for use within UK Government because we seek to embrace the fast moving pace of the software industry and to acknowledge the clear potential for open source software to change the software infrastructure marketplace. It also serves as an appropriate response to the recent European Commission's action plan for the initiative

eEurope—An information Society for all. UK Government, in joining with their European partners to explore the availability of open source software solutions, will seek to realise the significant potential for cost-savings in the future and to achieve an increased flexibility in the development, enhancement and integration of our IT systems.

Executive Agencies

asked Her Majesty's Government:What the outcome was of the review of policy towards executive agencies. [HL5468]

The Government have published the report of the review which was jointly sponsored by the Cabinet Office and the Treasury. Pam Alexander led the review. Copies of the review's report and recommendations have been placed in the Libraries of the House.The review has far-reaching implications for improving the delivery of central government services. It concludes that the agency model has been a success in improving, and in some cases transforming, services and functions delivered by central government and has brought customer focus and a performance culture into the Civil Service. However, it finds that agencies have in some cases become detached from Ministers and from departments' increasing focus on strategic aims; controls over processes have reduced effectiveness and responsiveness without providing a shared strategic direction.The report makes 12 recommendations to achieve and maintain strategic connection and improve service delivery. These include:departmental leadership which values equally policy and delivery skills and agency management with a clear understanding of ministerial objectives;simpler governance structures providing strategic direction from departments and external challenge from non-executive directors on management boards;alignment of departmental and agency key targets and a cycle of reviews to ensure that structures and processes across departments support the achievement of key objectives; andmaximum use of financial and managerial delegations to support responsive, flexible and effective delivery.The Cabinet Office and Treasury will be working with departments to put the review's recommendations into effect over the coming months as part of the wider drive to improve the effectiveness of public services and place a culture of delivery at the heart of government.

Civil Service Pension Arrangements

asked Her Majesty's Government:What plans they have to introduce new pension arrangements for the Civil Service. [HL5469]

Under the provisions of the Superannuation Act 1972, three amendment schemes have been placed before Parliament. The first of these amends the rules of the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme (PCSPS) and introduces new provisions for those joining the pension scheme on or after 1 October 2002. The second amendment scheme makes consequential changes to the Civil Service Compensation Scheme, and the third amendment scheme removes the injury benefit provisions of the PCSPS to a separate scheme.Pension arrangements for civil servants (and those in employments and offices listed in Schedule 1 to the Superannuation Act 1972) will change on 1 October 2002. New entrants joining after that date will generally be given the choice of a final salary pension or a stakeholder pension with an employer contribution. The new arrangements are being introduced on a cost-neutral basis for employers.We recognise that pensions form a significant part of the Civil Service remuneration package, and we want civil servants to be able to choose the pension that suits them best. Today's Civil Service does not offer a job for life and is benefiting from greater interchange with other sectors at all levels within the organisation. Final salary pensions may be good for those who spend a long period with one employer, but those who change jobs frequently during their career may prefer their employer to contribute to a stakeholder pension. By giving our new staff a choice of two good quality pension alternatives we aim not only to support a more diverse Civil Service but also to raise awareness and appreciation of the value of the pension element of the pay package.The new final salary option will be known as the premium scheme. It will provide a pension based on one-sixtieth of final pensionable earnings for each year of service. Other features of the premium scheme include:option to exchange part of pension for lump sum on retirement;ill-health pensions varying in amount depending on the extent of incapacity;death-in-service lump sum of three times pay;pensions for surviving spouses of 3/8ths of the member's pension;pension payable to a surviving eligible unmarried partner if the member does not leave a spouse;pensions for children.Existing members of the PCSPS will have the option of joining the premium scheme or remaining with the current provisions (to be renamed the classic scheme). Members opting for classic will continue to earn a pension based on 1/80th of pay for each year of service, plus a retirement lump sum of three times pension. Members opting to join the premium scheme will have their past service reduced—typically to 92 per cent of its previous amount—to reflect the improved benefit structure. Members may also opt for classic plus; this option effectively provides premium scheme benefits for service from I October with service before 1 October continuing to be pensioned broadly on the classic model.We are moving to the new arrangements on a cost-neutral basis, with the entire cost of benefit improvements being met by increased contributions by members. None of the cost of the benefit improvements will fall on the taxpayer. All premium and classic plus members will pay the new contribution rate of 3.5 per cent. Members opting to remain in the classic scheme will continue to pay contributions of 1.5 per cent of pay.The stakeholder pension alternative will be known as the partnership pension account. Employees will choose their pension provider from the following panel:

  • AMP Corporate Pensions
  • Scottish Widows
  • Standard Life
  • TUC.

Employees opting for a partnership pension account do not need to contribute but will be encouraged to do so by having their contributions matched up to 3 per cent of pay. In addition, the employer will pay contributions based on age, varying from 3 per cent of pay for those under 21, to 12.5 per cent of pay for those aged 46 and over. Lump sum benefits of up to three times pay on death in service and on ill health retirement will be provided separately and will be the subject of future schemes under the Superannuation Act.

Civil Service remuneration is set having regard to the need to recruit, retain and motivate staff of the appropriate quality. Full account is taken of the value of pension arrangements, including the cost of index-linking, in setting the balance between the pay and pension elements of the reward package.

The Civil Service unions have been involved throughout the development of the new pension options, both in negotiating the terms and also in appraising their members of the options open to them. The unions' constructive involvement throughout this process stands as a testament to the value of partnership working.

Government Car And Despatch Agency Annual Report And Accounts

asked Her Majesty's Government:When they expect to publish the Government Car and Despatch Agency's (GCDA) annual report and accounts 2001–02. [HL5535]

The GCDA annual report and accounts 2001–02 has today been laid before Parliament, copies of which are available in the Libraries of the House.

Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission

asked Her Majesty's Government:On what (a) general topics and (b) Bills they have sought advice of the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission; what was that advice; and in what ways it was acted upon. [HL4551]

The Northern Ireland Act 1998 required the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission to advise the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland on the scope for a Bill of Rights for Northern Ireland. The consultation is still ongoing, and the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission will send the final advice to the Secretary of State in 2003.Section 69(2) of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 required the commission to make recommendations to the Secretary of State as to the commission's effectiveness within two years of its inception. The Secretary of State received the commission's recommendations in March 2001, and has recently published, for consultation, the Government's response to the review document. Replies to the consultation document are expected in mid-August, at which time the Government will consider the replies received prior to issuing a response to the commission.The Government have also referred two Bills to the commission for comment, the Police (Northern Ireland) Bill and the Terrorism Bill. The commission offered advice to the Government on both those Bills. The Government have considered carefully the advice they have received from the commission in framing their policies and legislation. The advice given by the commission is a matter for the commission to make public, if it wishess.