Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 641: debated on Tuesday 3 December 2002

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

Tuesday, 3rd December 2002.

Chief Surveillance Commissioner: Annual Report

asked Her Majesty's Government:When they will publish the annual report for 2001–02 of the Chief Surveillance Commissioner appointed under section 91(1)(a) of the Police Act 1997. [HL399]

The Prime Minister has today laid before Parliament the annual report for 2001–02 of the Chief Surveillance Commissioner on the discharge of his functions under Part III of the Police Act 1997 and Part II of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000. As required. under Section 107(3A) of the Police Act 1997, after consultation with the Chief Surveillance Commissioner the Prime Minister can confirm that no matter has been excluded from the enclosed report.My right honourable friend the Prime Minister is most grateful to Sir Andrew Leggatt and his colleagues for the work which has gone into preparing it.

Criminal Records Bureau

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to Written Answers by Lord Falconer of Thoroton on 6 November (

WA 111), whether:

  • (a) no Minister or official from the Home Office formally agreed the specification for the contract with Capita to process criminal record checks, or
  • (b) no Minister or official from the Home Office was responsible for the actual procurement of the contract with Capita to process criminal record checks. [HL211]
  • Bernard Herdan, chief executive of the Criminal Records Bureau, (CRB) was the senior Home Office official responsible for the specification and for the actual award of the contract to Capita to process criminal record checks. Mr Herdan was, and remains, the senior accountable officer for the CRB.The Minister approved the user requirement for the CRB and the business case for public private partnerships outsourcing and agreed that a contract should be awarded on this basis.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Who is authorised to see personal bank and building society details which appear on an application form for a criminal record check; and what guarantee there is for the applicant that such information cannot be used or abused. [HL213]

    All Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) staff are authorised to see applicants' personal information supplied on the disclosure application form. All civil servants and Capita staff must be cleared to government security standards, undertaken by the Home Office Security Unit. In addition all civil servant CRB staff who are responsible for seeing and handling sensitive disclosure information are checked to the same level as enhanced disclosures. Only civil servants have access to the sensitive information held by the police and other data sources. The CRB carries out security checks on the employees of the data processing companies contracted to it. Contractors are also under a legal requirement to ensure their staff respect the confidential nature of the information released to them by an applicant.The scope of personal information available within and to the CRB is limited, precisely to prevent information being used inappropriately. All information on applicants is held confidentially in secure computer files, and we have taken steps to ensure that our systems and procedures prevent authorised access and unlawful disclosure. The CRB has taken advice from the Information Commissioner during the time when the disclosure application forms and our procedures were being drafted, and all personal information applications provide with their disclosure application will be protected under the Data Protection Act 1998.

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether any penalty clauses were built into the contract with Capita to process criminal record checks; whether any such clauses have been invoked; and to what effect. [HL216]

    The contract contains a series of "Milestones" schedule dates, which, in turn have liquidated damage (financial remedies) regimes attached to them. The contract also defines contracted service levels, failure to achieve these results in financial remedies being applied by the agency. Both categories of financial remedy have been applied.

    Updated Drug Strategy

    asked Her Majesty's Government:When they intend to publish their Updated Drug Strategy. [HL400]

    All controlled drugs are harmful and will remain illegal. Drug misuse is the biggest challenge society faces. It damages the health and life chances of individuals. It undermines family life, turns law-abiding citizens into thieves and erodes communities. It is essential that we educate the young about the dangers of drugs, prevent drug misuse, tackle the dealers to reduce the prevalence of drugs on the streets and reduce the harm drugs cause.

    To address this, the Government have published their Updated Drug Strategy developed to take account of new evidence of what works and to focus on delivery.

    In 1998 the first cross-cutting strategy was introduced to tackle drug trafficking, supply and misuse. This update builds on the foundations laid and the lessons learnt. We must concentrate on the most dangerous drugs, the most damaged communities and the individuals whose addiction and chaotic lifestyles are the most harmful, both to themselves and others. Education, prevention, enforcement, treatment and harm minimisation are our most powerful tools.

    Setting out a range of policies and interventions, the Updated Drug Strategy provides:

    A tougher focus on Class A drugs;

    A stronger focus on education, enforcement and treatment to prevent and tackle problematic drug use;

    More resources—direct annual expenditure for tackling drugs will rise from £1,026 million in this financial year to £1,244 million in the next financial year, £1,344 million in the year starting April 2004 to a total annual spend of nearly £1.5 billion in the year starting April 2005—an increase of 44 per cent;

    A major new education campaign to be launched in Spring 2003 to drive home the risks of drug misuse. More support for parents, carers and families so they can easily access advice, help, counselling and mutual support;

    More help for the young people most at risk of developing drug problems through increased outreach and community treatment and an extension of drug testing and referrals to treatment and care via the youth justice system so that by 2006, we are able to support 40,000 to 50,000 vulnerable young people a year;

    Strengthened enforcement—including new cross-regional police teams to tackle middle markets and targeted policing to crack down on crack;

    A major expansion of services to refer people into treatment via the criminal justice system. We will use every opportunity from arrest, to court and sentence to identify drug-misusing offenders and engage them in treatment. Starting from next year in the highest crime areas with the worst drug problems we will roll out a comprehensive end-to-end approach. This will ensure that every drug-addicted offender is identified through drug testing at the point of arrest and charge and given the choice at their bail hearing of entering treatment rather than entering custody. All this is backed up by extra resources for arrest referral, drug treatment and testing orders, treatment in prison and youth offending institutes and for post-release treatment and support for those leaving custody;

    An expansion of treatment services to ensure access is available when needed and is tailored to individual need, including residential treatment. Improved treatment for crack and cocaine users and heroin prescribing properly supervised for all those who would clinically benefit from it. By 2008, we will have developed the capacity to treat 200,000 problematic drug users each year. Funding for treatment services, including prisons, will increase by £45 million in the next financial year, £54 million for the year starting from April 2004 and £115 million from April 2005. This will be boosted by treatment funding associated with drug treatment and testing orders of nearly £10 million in the next financial year, £12 million in the year starting from April 2004 and £16 million from April 2005—bringing the total direct annual spend on treatment up to £589 million by 2005;

    New aftercare and throughcare services to help those leaving prison or treatment remain free from drugs;

    Strengthened capacity to deliver first in the areas with the greatest problems and improved services in those areas most affected by crack use; and

    Revised targets which are challenging but achievable.

    Copies of Updated Drug Strategy 2002 have been placed in the Library. It is also available on the web at http://www.drugs.gov.uk

    Iraq

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the human rights situation in Iraq. [HL363]

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office
    (Baroness Amos)

    On 2 December 2002, Her Majesty's Government published a report on human rights abuses in Iraq. It is based on intelligence material, first-hand accounts of Iraqi victims of torture and oppression, and reports amassed by NGOs over the past decade. The report examines Iraq's record on torture, the treatment of women, prison conditions, arbitrary and summary killings, the persecution of the Kurds and Shia, the harassment of opposition figures outside Iraq and the occupation of Kuwait.The Iraqi regime's contempt for international law and its attachment to weapons of mass destruction were documented in the Government's dossier published on 24 September. Its dreadful human rights record is widely known. Her Majesty's Government consider it important that Parliament and the public should have accurate information about the awful reality of Saddam Hussein's policy of regime terror, which sustains his rule inside Iraq.

    Lighthouses

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord Macdonald of Tradeston on 5 November (

    WA 92–93), whether they have received representations about bringing lighthouses around Britain and Ireland under the British-Irish Council; and, if so, from whom. [HL252]

    The Minister for the Cabinet Office and Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
    (Lord Macdonald of Tradeston)

    We have received one representation from the Northern Ireland Executive concerning lighthouses in Ireland and Northern Ireland only.

    European Bus Directive

    asked Her Majesty's Government: Further to the reply by Lord McIntosh of Haringey on 27 November (HL Deb, cols. 743–44), what is the position with the European Bus Directive, and whether the future of the double-decker bus is assured. [HL331]

    The directive was adopted on 20 November 2001. Officials at the Department of Transport are in the process of completing initial consultations requesting views on the proposed method of implementing it into UK legislation. We are proposing to integrate the requirements of the directive into a consolidation of existing bus and coach regulations to make them simpler and easier to understand. It is hoped to implement this consolidation in the latter half of 2003.The directive will have no effect on the use of existing double-decker buses operating in the UK. Our regulations will permit the current design of low-floor, accessible double-decker buses to continue to be produced.

    Civil Defence Grants

    asked Her Majesty's Government:If they will publish (a) the aggregate amount of civil defence grants to be made for the financial year 2003–04, (b) the amount of grant to be paid in to each local authority, and (c) any formula or other criteria used to determine the allocation between authorities. [HL370]

    The aggregate amount is £19,038,000 of which £100,000 will be retained as discretionary grant for special projects and special events deemed of benefit to the wider emergency planning community in England and Wales.The remaining £18,938,000 will be allocated to individual authorities as set out in the table below.

    The grants have been allocated in the same way as last year, but with each authority receiving an equal share of the additional £70,000 available. Every authority thereby receives a slight increase in grant of £386.

    Local Authority

    Grant Allocation 2003–04 (£)

    Anglesey/Ynys Mon61,342
    Barking and Dagenham75,969
    Barnet80,694
    Barnsley76,076
    Bath and North East Somerset90,011
    Bedfordshire136,511
    Bexley78,758
    Birmingham187,380
    Blackburn with Darwen70,658
    Blackpool66,662
    Blaenau Gwent63,083
    Bolton82,674
    Bournemouth70,122
    Bracknell Forest63,899
    Bradford125,756
    Brent86,592
    Bridgend68,323
    Brighton and Hove81,172
    Bristol98,486
    Bromley84,980
    Buckinghamshire200,557
    Bury71,195
    Caerphilly73,088
    Calderdale74,574
    Cambridgeshire163,057
    Camden84,175
    Cardiff87,322
    Carmarthenshire73,858
    Ceredigion64,143
    Cheshire189,969
    Conwy64,811
    Cornwall189,279
    Corporation of London60,145
    Coventry77,776
    Croydon90,666
    Cumbria216,116
    Darlington63,899
    Denbighshire71,434
    Derby76,503
    Derbyshire220,459
    Devon217,294
    Doncaster85,516
    Dorset175,886
    Dudley82,908
    Durham213,601
    Ealing90,344
    East Riding of Yorkshire72,166
    East Sussex208,288
    Enfield88,198
    Essex315,112
    Flintshire77,741
    Gateshead79,140
    Gloucestershire189,960
    Greater Manchester FCDA64,060
    Greenwich86,482
    Gwynedd67,698
    Hackney88,145
    Halton68,137
    Hammersmith and Fulham76,719
    Hampshire298,996
    Haringey85,624
    Harrow65,726
    Hartlepool64,650
    Havering77,685
    Herefordshire70,229
    Hertfordshire310,886
    Hillingdon81,386

    Local Authority

    Grant Allocation 2003–04 (£)

    Hounslow80,742
    Hull (Kingston upon Hull)72,265
    Isle of Wight72,230
    Isles of Scilly53,708
    Islington83,424
    Kensington and Chelsea74,788
    Kent339,586
    Kingston upon Thames67,654
    Kirklees95,431
    Knowsley74,359
    Lambeth87,789
    Lancashire315,233
    Leeds172,987
    Leicester88,896
    Leicestershire192,957
    Lewisham83,978
    Lincolnshire212,793
    Liverpool97,648
    London FEPA151,825
    Luton59,894
    Manchester147,667
    Medway81,547
    Merseyside FCDA73,332
    Merthyr Tydfil60,998
    Merton72,053
    Middlesbrough71,355
    Milton Keynes81,404
    Monmouthshire62,154
    Neath Port Talbot70,259
    Newcastle Upon Tyne102,823
    Newham88,226
    Newport68,616
    Norfolk276,813
    North East Lincolnshire71,624
    North Lincolnshire69,532
    North Somerset71,248
    North Tyneside74,091
    North Yorkshire244,523
    Northamptonshire239,260
    Northumberland188,122
    Nottingham86,321
    Nottinghamshire210,927
    Oldham79,294
    Oxfordshire202,459
    Pembrokeshire66,735
    Peterborough72,214
    Plymouth81,708
    Poole66,635
    Portsmouth74,467
    Powys85,886
    Reading67,386
    Redbridge82,566
    Redcar and Cleveland69,693
    Rhondda Cynon Taff82,319
    Richmond upon Thames69,424
    Rochdale77,310
    Rotherham81,654
    Rutland56,443
    Salford72,386
    Sandwell88,413
    Sefton84,015
    Sheffield96,386
    Shropshire153,834
    Slough68,566
    Solihull73,716
    Somerset164,359
    South Gloucestershire76,183
    South Tyneside71,516
    South Yorkshire FCDA84,356
    Southampton77,470
    Southend71,966
    Southwark77,343
    St Helens73,333
    Staffordshire226,842

    Local Authority

    Grant Allocation 2003–04 (£)

    Stockport79,992
    Stockton-on-Tees73,877
    Stoke-on-Trent74,413
    Suffolk221,786
    Sunderland101,107
    Surrey297,388
    Sutton73,126
    Swansea78,933
    Swindon71,355
    Tameside77,310
    Telford and Wrekin72,385
    Thurrock68,666
    Torbay67,440
    Torfaen64,876
    Tower Hamlets93,509
    Trafford75,754
    Tyne and Wear FCDA34,892
    Vale of Glamorgan72,385
    Wakefield86,667
    Walsall83,639
    Waltham Forest83,532
    Wandsworth79,155
    Warrington72,804
    Warwickshire181,722
    West Berkshire67,815
    West Midlands FCDA60,386
    West Sussex225,386
    West Yorkshire FCDA61,593
    Westminster86,804
    Wigan84,497
    Wiltshire194,786
    Windsor and Maidenhead66,796
    Wirral89,861
    Wokingham66,525
    Wolverhampton82,030
    Worcestershire186,835
    Wrexham72,926
    York72,220

    Hms "Nottingham"

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What plans they have for the repair of HMS "Nottingham". [HL371]

    When the destroyer HMS "Nottingham" grounded in Australian waters on 7 July 2002 she sustained severe damage and flooding in the forward part of the ship. She is now on passage to the UK on a heavy lift ship and is expected to arrive in United Kingdom waters on 7 December. She will then be unloaded and towed into HM naval base at Portsmouth where a contract has been placed for her repair with Fleet Support Limited. The repair work—which will cost around £26 million, including all materials supplied by the department—is expected to last up to 18 months. HMS "Nottingham" is expected to return to operational service in November 2004.HMS "Nottingham" is a highly capable Type 42 destroyer designed to provide area air defence either independently or as an integral component of larger joint or coalition maritime task groups. Her key weapons, sensors and command system were significantly ungraded during an extensive refit in 1999–2000. These improvements will enable the ship to keep pace with the increasing demands of maritime air defence during the next 10 years and will aid interoperability with key allies, in particular the USA. HMS "Nottingham's" contribution will be crucial to bridging the air defence gap during the drawdown in Sea Harrier air defence aircraft beginning in 2005 and the introducton of the Type 45 destroyer from 2007.To ease the short-term programming gap in the fleet created by HMS "Nottingham's" unavailability, HMS "Glasgow'', an older and less capable Type 42, is being regenerated from a planned state of lower readiness. An alternative solution which would have given HMS "Glasgow" a similar capability upgrade to that received by HMS "Nottingham" was deemed to provide best value for money.

    Armed Forces: Invalidity Pensions

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the internal review of mistaken taxation of some Armed Forces invalidity pensions has been completed. [HL372]

    On 25 April 2002 (Official Report, cols. 426–27W), we informed the House in another place that the problem of mistaken taxation of some service invalidity pensions were more extensive than previously understood. We reported that we had set up an internal review, independent of the staffs involved, to establish the extent of the taxation errors and expose any related problems. This review is now complete.The review has established that the taxation problem is more extensive than we indicated in April. It is now clear that some RAF pensions are affected, and that RN pensions affected are not limited to the period 1973–99. In addition, the review has found that further work is needed on Army pensions; this is required both to re-examine more thoroughly certain cases adjudged when first reviewed as correctly taxed, and to examine for the first time some other cases previously not thought to be at risk.The findings of the review mean that the number of files needing examination has proved considerably larger than we stated previously. We now expect it will not be possible to complete a comprehensive check for all three services before next summer. We regret that this work cannot be done faster, but it is vital that it be done accurately by suitably cleared staff who are also familiar with the relevant documents. The pace of the work is also affected by the lack of comprehensive

    Students obtaining qualifications in social work HE institutions in the UK
    Year of qualification:
    1995–961996–971997–981998–991999–20002000–01
    Qualification type:
    Diploma of HE2,0022,0391,9271,6861,4791,645
    Certificate of HE7086298274370335
    HND/HNC135188166207210337
    Other undergraduate diploma/certificate1,2581,1741,0241,0059231,225
    Total3,4653,4873,4153,1722,9823,542

    Source:

    Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) Student Record.

    computerised information distinguishing invalidity pensions from others. This has made it necessary to handle tens of thousands of files which are not at risk in order to identify those that are. This difficulty continues to affect progress.

    We are very much aware of the importance of giving as much priority as possible to examining the cases of our oldest pensioners. Although over 70 per cent of errors identified so far affect younger pensioners, discharged in or after 1990, we anticipate that errors still to be found will include some affecting the oldest age-group. We much regret that in several of the cases recently re-examined a pensioner, previously misadvised that his pension was correctly taxed, has died before an error was recognised. In such cases the tax refund is to be paid, with due apology, to the pensioner's widow or estate.

    A further problem brought to light by the review is that some of the pensions taxed in error were also affected by an underpayment of Armed Forces pension scheme benefits. Over 350 pensioners have so far been identified in this category, most of whom were discharged in the 1990s. The average underpayment in these cases was around £4,500. The cost to date of rectifying tax errors has been some £5 million, which happens also to be an average of some £4,500 per pensioner.

    The review includes a full analysis of the causes of errors and the necessary remedial action; the latter is already in hand. The procedures used in the conduct of the review have been validated by the National Audit Office. The NAO's letter of validation and the report of the review have been placed in the Library of the House.

    Social Work: Awards Of Undergraduate Qualifications

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many persons were awarded the National Diploma in Social Work last year; and how this figure compares with each of the previous five years. [HL66]

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Education and Skills
    (Barones Ashton of Upholland)

    The latest available information showing the number of students who obtained undergraduate diplomas or certificates, is shown in the following table. Information for 2001–02 will be available in January 2003.

    School Admissions: Consultation Document

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether copies of the consultation document on school admissions were sent to all schools and governing bodies; and who else received the consultation document. [HL228]

    As part of a drive to reduce the amount of paperwork sent directly to schools, the department routinely consults representative samples, rather than going to every individual school. In this instance, the consultation was targeted towards admission authorities, as they would have the most direct interest in changes to the codes and regulations. All local education authorities—as the admission authorities of community and voluntary controlled schools—were consulted, along with a representative sample of foundation and voluntary aided schools, who are their own admission authorities, and a smaller sample of other non-admission authority schools. The consultation was also available on the department's website. In addition, the following representative and national bodies were also consulted:

    • Advisory Centre for Education (ACE) Ltd
    • The Association of Foundation and Voluntary Aided Schools
    • Association of London Government
    • Association of Muslim Schools (UK)
    • The Board of Deputies of British Jews
    • British Humanist Association
    • Campaign for State Education (CASE)
    • Catholic Education Service and diocesan boards of education
    • Centre for Academies Support Services (CASS)
    • Church of England Board of Education and diocesan boards of education
    • Commission for Racial Equality
    • Consortium for Selective Schools in Essex
    • Council on Tribunals
    • CTC Principals' Forum
    • Department of Health
    • Equal Opportunities Commission
    • Free Church Federal Council
    • Greek Orthodox Church
    • Home Office Immigration and Nationality Division
    • Information for School and College Governors (ISCG)
    • Local Government Association
    • Local Government Ombudsman
    • National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers
    • National Confederation of Parent Teacher Associations
    • National Governors Council
    • National Union of Teachers
    • Office of the Schools Adjudicator
    • Public Sec eam, Cabinet Office
    • Personnel Command—Personnel Services, Foreign and Commonwealth Office
    • Secondary Heads Association
    • Service Personnel Policy Families
    • Seventh-Day Adventist Church
    • Sikh Secretariat
    • Society of Friends
    • The Education Network
    • The Muslim Educational Trust
    • The Wales Office

    Foot And Mouth: Research Into Emotional, Social And Mental Health Consequences

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will undertake or commission further work into the emotional, social and mental health consequences of foot and mouth disease in Cumbria; and whether the research should be extended to encompass children. [HL74]

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health
    (Lord Hunt of Kings Heath)

    A national study is currently being carried out by the Institute of Health Research at Lancaster University, on behalf of the Department of Health, and is due to conclude in 2004.In the mean time the Department of Health through the Rural Stress Action Plan continues to work closely with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs to support farmers and their families with the aim of delivering support that will make a difference to those in need.

    Nhs Managers: Early Retirements

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many managerial staff, at each grade and for each region of the National Health Service, have been granted concessionary pension benefits arising from early retirement during the financial years 2001–02 and 2002–03 to date; and [HL158]How many managerial employees of the National Health Service who took early retirement in the financial years 2001–02 and 2002–03 to date were aged 61–65, 56–60, 51–55, and 50 and under respectively. [HL159]

    The information requested is not collected centrally. The number of early retirements, in respect of all National Health Service staff in England and Wales, in the financial years 2001–02 and up to October 2002–03, is in the table:

    Number
    2001–025,755
    2002–032,746
    Early retirements include those from age 50, on the grounds of redundancy, retirement in the interests of the efficiency of the service, agreed voluntary early retirement and ill-health retirements at any age.

    Nhs: Cost Of Temporary Workers

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What was the cost to the National Health Service in 2001–02 of temporary workers, broken down between the cost of doctors, nurses and other staff categories. [HL272]

    Information on the cost to the National Health Service in 2001–02 of temporary workers, by category, is not available yet, but figures are expected to be available from mid-December 2002.

    Primary Healthcare: Rural One-Stop Centres

    asked Her Majesty's Government: Further to the Rural Proofing Report (page 20), how many rural, one-stop, primary healthcare centres have been opened since the production of the report. [HL317]

    The NHS Plan sets a target to create 500 new one-stop centres to bring together primary and community care services. The rural White Paper announced that up to 100 of these centres or mobile service units will serve rural populations. Data are currently being analysed and a copy of the results will be placed in the Library when available.

    European Union: Forthcoming Council Business And Major Events

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the forthcoming business in the Council of the European Union for December, and what are the major European Union events for the period between 1 January and 30 June 2003. [HL364]

    Business in the Council of the European Union, December 2002 including major European Union events, 1 January to 30 June 2003 is as follows:

    December

    • 2—Brussels—Meeting on Macro Economic Dialogue (Ministerial Troika)
    • 3—Brussells—ECOFIN
    • 2–3—Brussels—Employment, Social Policy, Health & Consumer Affairs Council
    • 4—Brussels—Meeting of the Praesidium
    • 5–6—Brussels—Transport, Telecom & Energy Council
    • 9—Brussels—General Affairs Council
    • 9–10—Brussels—Environment Council
    • 12–13—Copenhagen—European Council
    • 16–19—Brussels—Agricultural & Fisheries Council
    • 19—Brussels—Meeting of the Praesidium
    • 20—Brussels—Justice & Home Affairs & Civil Protection Council
    • 20–21–Brussels—Convention Plenary—External Action & Defence Working Group Conclusions

    Date

    Location

    Event

    January 2003
    9BrusselsMeeting of the Praesidium
    9BrusselsAgriculture & Fisheries Council (tbc)
    16BrusselsMeeting of the Praesidium
    20BrusselsEUROGROUP (evening)
    20BrusselsConvention Plenary
    20–21BrusselsAgriculture & Fisheries Council
    21BrusselsECOFIN
    24NafplionEmployment Council (Ministerial Informal)
    27–28BrusselsGeneral Affairs & External Relations Council
    28BrusselsEU-ASEAN Ministerial
    30BrusselsMeeting of the Praesidium

    February 2003

    5BrusselsMeeting of the Praesdium
    6–7BrusselsConvention Plenary
    10–11BrusselsAgriculture & Fisheries Council (tbc)
    13BrusselsMeeting of the Praesidium
    17BrusselsEUROGROUP (evening)
    18BrusselsECOFIN
    20BrusselsEducation, Youth & Culture Council (tbc)
    22ThessalonikiEnergy Council (Ministerial Informal)
    24–25BrusselsGeneral Affairs & External Relations Council Agriculture & Fisheries
    26BrusselsMeeting of the Praesidium
    27–28BrusselsConvention Plenary
    27–28BrusselsJustice & Home Affairs Council
    28BrusselsEmployment, Social Policy, Health & Consumer Affairs Council

    March 2003

    1–2IoanninaInformal Education
    3BrusselsCompetitiveness Council
    4BrusselsEnvironment Council
    6BrusselsMeeting of the Praesidium
    6LuxembourgEmployment, Social Policy, Health & Consumer Affairs Council
    6LuxembourgEUROGROUP (evening)
    7LuxembourgECOFIN
    7LuxembourgTransport, Telecom & Energy Council
    13BrusselsMeeting of the Praesidium
    14–15Athens(Informal Defence Meeting)
    17–18BrusselsConvention Plenary
    17–18LuxembourgAgriculture & Fisheries Council
    18–19LuxembourgGeneral Affairs & External Relations Council

    Date

    Location

    Event

    21BrusselsEuropean Council
    27BrusselsMeeting of the Praesidium
    27VeriaJustice and Home Affairs Council (Ministerial Informal)
    27–28LuxembourgTransport, Telecom & Energy Council
    27–28AthensEU–Rio Group, EU-MERCOSUR
    28–29VeriaInformal Justice & Home Affairs (Veria)
    31BrusselsAgriculture & Fisheries Council (tbc)

    April 2003

    2BrusselsMeeting of the Praesidium
    3–4BrusselsConvention Plenary
    4BrusselsJustice & Home Affairs
    4–6Hania (Crete)Informal ECOFIN (Ministerial)
    5LisbonEurope—Africa Summit
    5IoanninaMinisterial Meeting on Education (Informal)
    10BrusselsMeeting of the Praesidium
    11–13ChaniaECOFIN (Informal)
    14BrusselsGeneral Affairs & External Relations
    14BrusselsAgriculture & Fisheries
    16AthensEuropean Conference
    16AthensSignature of the Accession (Provisional Date)
    23BrusselsMeeting of the Praesidium
    24–25BrusselsConvention Plenary

    May 2003

    2–4GreeceGymnich (Informal Foreign Ministers)
    5AthensInformal Environment (Ministerial)
    5–6BrusselsEducation, Youth & Culture Council (tbc)
    8BrusselsMeeting of the Praesidium
    12–13CorfuAgriculture (Ministerial Informal)
    12–13BrusselsCompetitiveness
    12BrusselsEUROGROUP
    13BrusselsECOFIN
    14BrusselsMeeting of the Praesidium
    14BrusselsTransport, Telecom & Energy Council
    15–16BrusselsConvention Plenary
    16BrusselsEU—ACP Ministerial
    16–17HalkidikiInformal Regional Policy (Ministerial)
    16–18Cruise off GreeceInformal Transport & Merchant Marine (Ministerial)
    17BrusselsEU—W. Balkans (Zagreb Process)
    19BrusselsGeneral Affairs & External Relations (plus Defence)
    20BrusselsGeneral Affairs & External Relations
    22BrusselsMeeting of the Praesidium
    24ThessalonikiInformal Culture (Ministerial)
    26–27BrusselsAgriculture & Fisheries Council
    26–27AthensEUROMED Conference (Mid Term Ministerial)
    27BrusselsEnvironment Council
    28BrusselsMeeting of the Praesidium
    30–31BrusselsConvention Plenary
    31St PetersburgEU—Russia Summit

    June 2003

    2BrusselsEUROGROUP
    2–3AlexandroupoliDevelopment Co-operation (Ministerial Informal)
    2–3BrusselsTransport, Telecom & Energy Council
    3BrusselsECOFIN
    4BrusselsMeeting of the Praesidium
    5–6BrusselsConvention Plenary

    Date

    Location

    Event

    5–6BrusselsJustice & Home Affairs Council
    5–6BrusselsEmployment, Social Policy, Health & Consumer Affairs Council
    11BrusselsMeeting of the Praesidium
    11–12BrusselsAgriculture & Fisheries Council
    12–13BrusselsConvention Plenary
    17–18BrusselsGeneral Affairs & External Relations
    20–21ThessalonikiEuropean Council
    22BrusselsGeneral Affairs & External Relations
    24BrusselsEmployment, Social Policy, Health & Consumer Affairs Council

    Intermediate Level Radioactive Waste

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether adequate arrangements exist for the disposal of intermediate nuclear waste following the dismantling of Hinkley Point nuclear power station. [HL200]

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Trade and Industry
    (Lord Sainsbury of Turville)

    All intermediate level radioactive waste (ILW) is currently stored in line with government policy. This is under review, and the present arrangements for managing ILW arising from the decommissioning of Hinkley Point A will be revised should the resulting policy require it.

    Tourism: Regional Development Agency Staff

    asked Her Majesty's Government: How many regional development agencies employ personnel specifically dealing with tourism in their areas. [HL205]

    All regional development agencies (RDAs) employ staff who have tourism as a specific part of their job description.As from April 2003 RDAs will play a stronger part in the strategic leadership of tourism in their regions, including working with the industry to develop a coherent marketing agenda. Regional tourist boards are the natural delivery partners for the RDAs.

    Defra: Public Consultation

    asked Her Majesty's Government:How many of the 83 public consultations the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs instigated since 1 June 2001 have been responded to and acted upon [HL219]

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
    (Lord Whitty)

    Information on DEFRA public consultation exercises, including responses to consultations where respondents have not requested anonymity, can be obtained from the DEFRA website at www.defra.gov.uk.All DEFRA public consultation exercises are responded to and acted upon in the sense that every response is thoroughly analysed and taken into account in the development of policies and Proposals. A large proportion of exercises result in proposals being changed in some way, or contribute to the development of policies or UK negotiating lines. Examples of changes made as a result of consultation include amendments to the tone and content of codes of practice, changes to draft legislation, and the withdrawal of some regulatory proposals. Our responses to some of the consultation exercises carried out this year are still under consideration.